Advanced
Stable carbon isotope signatures of zooplankton in some reservoirs in Korea
Stable carbon isotope signatures of zooplankton in some reservoirs in Korea
Journal of Ecology and Environment. 2013. Sep, 36(3): 183-191
Copyright ©2013, The Ecological Society of Korea
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use,distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original workis properly cited.
  • Received : April 18, 2013
  • Accepted : September 09, 2013
  • Published : September 27, 2013
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Lee Jeayong
Present address: Research Institute of Nature and Human, Wonju 200-844, Korea
Yunkyoung Lee
Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea
Changwon Jang
Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea
Jeffrey S. Owen
Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea
Jai-Ku Kim
Chungrok Environmental Ecosystem Research Institute, Anyang 431-070, Korea
Jaesung Eum
Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea
Sungmin Jung
Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea
Bomchul Kim
Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea
bkim@kangwon.ac.kr

Abstract
Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and zooplankton and particulate organic matter (POM) δ 13 C values were measured in five reservoirs in Korea. Zooplankton δ 13 C and POM δ 13 C showed large range from -33‰ to -22‰ and a significant difference among the reservoirs. One eutrophic reservoir, Lake Masan, showed unique characteristics with the highest zooplankton density, the highest δ 13 C, and the highest DOC. Zooplankton δ 13 C was similar to POM δ 13 C, implying that zooplankton occupies substantial portion of POM or that zooplankton isotopic composition is related to selective grazing and assimilation of food sources from bulk POM. Except Lake Masan zooplankton δ 13 C values were negatively correlated to DOC concentration in four reservoirs with mostly forest land use. This pattern can be probably attributed to intensive agricultural land use in the watershed of Lake Masan compared to the mostly forest land use in the other watersheds. Understanding the relationship between zooplankton δ 13 C values and the origin of organic matter associated with watershed characteristics will be valuable to better understand trophic relationships in reservoirs in the summer monsoon region.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Small reservoirs are important for use as agricultural water supplies, flood control and power generation in many areas throughout the east-Asia monsoon region. These reservoirs provide opportunities for comparative studies of patterns and processes in small lake ecosystems in a variety of climatic and landscape settings. Perhaps the most distinctive characteristic in the typical seasonal pattern in lakes and reservoirs in Korea is the input of large amounts of allochthonous nutrients and organic matter during the summer monsoon (Lee et al. 2013). In Korea, monsoon rainfall can occur from July to September, with the other seasons generally being much drier. During intense monsoon rain events, the nutrient and organic matter inputs to reservoirs from watersheds increases dramatically with increases in stream discharge. The input of large amounts of allochthonous nutrients and organic matter can greatly impact the biology and chemistry of reservoirs, even for a substantial period following the summer monsoon (here referred to as postmonsoon) (Kim et al. 2000, Li et al. 2008, Lee et al. 2013). The elevated inputs of nutrients and organic matter often results in post-monsoon cyanobacteria blooms (especially Microcystis spp.) and high chlorophyll- a concentrations (Kim et al. 2000, Lee et al. 2010).
In general, phytoplankton is a preferred food source for zooplankton, but zooplankton may not be able to directly use only phytoplankton as a food source because some cyanobacteria are inedible and the elevated POM concentration likely results from the increase in input of terrestrial organic matter during the monsoon season (Lee et al. 2013, De Kluijver et al. 2012). Some cyanobacteria can be unsuitable as a food source for herbivorous zooplankton and inhibit not only feeding ability but also zooplankton growth (Chen et al. 2005).
Seasonal changes in the zooplankton community in some temperate lakes are associated with increases in Microcystis abundance (Kim et al. 2000, Lee et al. 2010). The typical temporal pattern in zooplankton dominance is a sudden change from cladocerans to small zooplankton such as copepods or rotifers with the appearance of Microcystis (Kim et al. 2000, Lee et al. 2010). In some lakes, the seasonal variation in zooplankton δ 13 C values can be explained by changes in the relative proportions of phytoplankton and terrestrial organic matter in zooplankton diets (Grey et al. 2000, Gu et al. 2006). In lakes where a significant fraction of the organic matter originates from the watershed, zooplankton isotopic composition provides information about the contribution of carbon from allochthonous sources to the lake versus carbon derived via primary production in the lake. Studies using stable isotopes have shown that zooplankton production is supported by both allochthonous and autochthonous sources of carbon, with the higher fraction of carbon from autochthonous sources in more eutrophic lakes (Del Giorgio and France 1996, Schindler et al. 1997, Grey et al. 2000). Some studies have concluded that zooplankton production in temperate lakes may acquire a large fraction of their energy from allochthonous inputs through heterotrophic activity (Pace et al. 2004, Rautio et al. 2011, Cole et al. 2011). Therefore, we can gain some insight to the pathways of carbon transfer by comparing differences in zooplankton grazing activity, which probably plays an important role in mediating the transfer of terrestrial carbon to higher trophic levels.
The zooplankton community regulates energy flow from producers to upper trophic levels in lake ecosystems (Jeppesen et al. 2003, Hessen 2008, Santana et al. 2009). Analysis of zooplankton stable isotope composition can be useful because zooplankton have short turnover times and respond rapidly to environmental changes (Browne 1981, Schindler et al. 1997).
Using carbon stable isotopes to follow the flow of carbon in food webs has two advantages over other methods. First, the ratio of 13 C and 12 C in a consumer’s tissue reflects relatively long-term diet because stable isotopes effectively integrate the consumer’s feeding history. Second, consumer tissue stable isotope composition reflect only materials actually assimilated and incorporated into tissue, as opposed to the total material ingested, as long as the gut contents are removed before analysis.
In this study, we compared zooplankton and POM δ 13 C values with DOC concentration in five reservoirs which are impacted by the elevated loads of nutrients and organic matter received during the summer monsoon season in Korea. In reservoirs with large inputs of nutrients and organic matter during summer monsoon storms, zooplankton δ 13 C values are likely most closely controlled by selective zooplankton grazing in the post-monsoon season (Kankaala et al. 2010, De Kluijver et al. 2012). The reservoirs selected for this study commonly experience cyanobacteria blooms following the monsoon season (post-monsoon). The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in zooplankton δ 13 C and POM δ 13 C values and the relationship between zooplankton δ 13 C values and DOC concentration among five reservoirs with different proportions of agricultural land use in their watersheds.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
- Study sites
We surveyed five reservoirs, including oligo-mesotrophic (BG, Byeokgye; JY, Jinyang; KP, Keumpung) and eutrophic reservoirs (JS, Jusan; MS, Masan) ( Fig. 1 ). The reservoirs are largely (greater than 70%) surrounded by hardwood forest except for MS ( Table 1 ). MS is located in an agricultural area. The watershed of JS is mostly forested, without major anthropogenic activity. MS has about 42% of the total watershed as forest land, compared with the other watersheds having <20% of their watershed area used for agriculture ( Table 1 ).
- Field sampling and analysis
Water samples for nutrient analysis were collected at the surface (0.1 m depth) during the post-monsoon season (September through October 2009). At each site, the following water quality parameters were measured in situ: pH meter (Denver Instrument Company, Arvada, CO, USA), YSI 55 dissolved oxygen meter (YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH, USA), and 2100P turbidimeter (Hach Co., Ames, IA, USA). Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total
Lager Image
Location of the study sites. JS, Jusan; BG, Byeokgye; JY, Jinyang; KP, Keumpung; MS, Masan.
phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations were measured in the laboratory on unfiltered samples. Samples for determination of TP and TN concentrations were acidified with 18N H 2 SO 4 and refrigerated until analysis. TP concentration was measured using the ascorbic acid method according to APHA (1998). TN concentration was measured by cadmium reduction after digestion with persulfate (APHA, 1998). DOC concentrations were measured using a TOC-5000A analyzer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Chlorophyll- a concentrations (Chl- a ) were measured
Location and land use in the watersheds of study reservoirs
Lager Image
Location and land use in the watersheds of study reservoirs
after extraction with 90% acetone on GF/F filters (Whatman, Kent, UK).
- Stable isotope analysis
Samples for zooplankton analysis were collected near the center of each reservoir using a net for a Schindler- Patalas trap with a 63μm Nitex mesh (Wildco, Yulee, FL, USA) for zooplankton. A separate sample was collected for phytoplankton analysis using a Van Dorn sampler (Wildco) at the surface (0.1 m). To separate zooplankton from suspended particulate matter, samples were kept refrigerated and separated by gravity in a 3 L cylinder for 12 hours and filtered using a 200 μm mesh sieve and a distilled water rinse.
POM samples were collected using a Van Dorn sampler at discrete depths. Samples were pre-filtered through a 45 μm mesh net to remove zooplankton and then filtered using pre-combusted (450℃) GF/F filters. Phytoplankton samples were concentrated in the field using the plankton net with a 63 μm mesh (Wildco). The bulk phytoplankton which settled to the bottom of a cylinder was separated from suspended particulate organic matter and zooplankton with 200 μm and 45 μm mesh nets. Samples for stable isotope analysis were freeze dried and pulverized with a mill. Sediment samples were fumigated in desiccator (1 N HCl) for 4 hours and dried at 45 ℃ to remove inorganic carbon.
Carbon stable isotope composition was analyzed using an Isoprime (GV Instruments) Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer (IRMS) coupled with an Elementar Vario EL Cube Elemental Analyzer (EA) (Isoprime Ltd., Cheadle, UK). The stable isotope results are presented as the difference between the sample and an international standard (VPDB, Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite): X (‰) = [R sample /R standard - 1] × 10 3 , where X is the parts per thousand (‰) difference from a standard. R is the ratio of heavy ( 13 C) to light isotope ( 12 C). The precision for repeated sample measurement was better than ±0.3‰.
- Statistical analyses
SigmaPlot ver. 11.0 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Regression analysis was used to test the relationships between DOC and isotopic composition of POM and zooplankton.
RESULTS
- Reservoir chemistry
The surface water pH of the study reservoirs ranged from 6.0 to 9.1 and DO concentrations ranged from 2.2 mg/L to 14.3 mg/L ( Table 2 ). The range of surface water pH in KP and JS (pH 6.0-6.7) was slightly lower than in the other reservoirs (pH 6.8-9.1). These two reservoirs also had the low DO concentrations (2.2-8.5 mg/L). DOC concentrations varied from 2.2 mg C/L to 5.2 mg C/L, with JS and MS having the high DOC concentrations ( Table 2 ).
Lager Image
Phytoplankton and zooplankton populations in the studyreservoirs.
The Chl- a concentrations of surface waters ranged from 6 mg/L to 26.5 mg/L, except in MS showing 95.2 ± 12.0 (mean ± SD) mg/L in Table 2 .
- Zooplankton and phytoplankton communities
Zooplankton and phytoplankton density was mainly composed of rotifera and blue-green algae (cyanobacteria), respectively ( Fig. 2 ) in all reservoirs. The dominant zooplankton species in JS, BG, and KP were the copepods ( Cyclops vicinus , Thermocyclops sp., and Mesocyclops sp.). The zooplankton community in MS and JY were dominated by a kind of rotifera ( Asplanchna sp.) and copepoda ( Eodiaptomus sp.), respectively. The dominant phytoplankton were cyanobacteria species such as Chroococcus minutus (sites BG and JY), Phormidium sp. (site MS), Microcystis sp. (site JS) and Coelosphaerium sp. (site KP). The predominant feature of seasonal succession in the phytoplankton community is the occurrence of cyanobacteria blooms after summer monsoon.
Water chemistry of the study reservoirs (SD, Secchi disc transparency; DO, dissolved oxygen; DOC, dissolved organic carbon; Chl-a, chlorophylla; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus concentration)
Lager Image
Water chemistry of the study reservoirs (SD, Secchi disc transparency; DO, dissolved oxygen; DOC, dissolved organic carbon; Chl-a, chlorophyll a; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus concentration)
Lager Image
Comparison of zooplankton δ13C and POM δ13C in the studyreservoirs.
Lager Image
Relationship between zooplankton δ13C and DOC concentrationin the study reservoirs.
- Relationship of zooplankton δ13C and POM δ13C among reservoirs
Zooplankton δ 13 C values and POM δ 13 C values ranged from -33.2‰ to -22.6‰, from -32.4‰ to -22.6‰, respectively ( Fig. 3 ). There was a positive relationship between zooplankton δ 13 C values and POM δ 13 C values ( Fig. 3 ). For the four reservoirs with relatively higher proportion of forested land use (BG, JY, JS and KP), zooplankton δ 13 C values were negatively related to DOC concentration. Zooplankton δ 13 C values differed between MS and JS despite having similar DOC concentrations ( Fig. 4 ).
DISCUSSION
- Relationship between zooplankton δ13C and POM δ13C
This general difference we found in zooplankton δ 13 C values is similar to the results of previous studies showing higher zooplankton δ 13 C values in reservoirs affected by agricultural inputs than in reservoirs surrounded by forested land (Gu et al. 1994, Yoshioka et al. 1994). Zooplankton δ 13 C values were significantly higher in MS with the major land use as agricultural land than in the other reservoirs with mostly forested land use ( Figs. 2 and 3 ). Bacterial utilization of allochthonous organic matter derived from the watershed introduces a carbon source for zooplankton production, which may replace carbon sources such as phytoplankton production as a carbon source for zooplankton in reservoirs with forested land use (Salonen and Hammar 1986). Jones et al. (1999) reported that zooplankton δ 13 C showed a significant trend towards greater 13 C enrichment with increasing Chl- a concentration in the forest oligotrophic lakes in southern Finland. This is because phytoplankton δ 13 C values are a effected by primary production, the isotopic composition of CO 2 and pH. Phytoplankton δ 13 C values are high in lakes with high Chl- a concentration compared to others with low Chl- a concentration and thus zooplankton in these lakes have higher δ 13 C values reflecting the isotopic composition of phytoplankton which zooplankton feed.
Our findings support the idea that zooplankton δ 13 C values are useful indicators of food source and watershed land use (Del Giorgio and France 1996, Jones et al. 1999). Studies from other regions provide examples of the relationship between the stable isotopic composition of lake and reservoir biota and trophic conditions. For example, in several subarctic lakes, zooplankton δ 13 C values were lower than in urban eutrophic lakes (Rautio and Vincent 2007).
In our study, zooplankton δ 13 C values and POM δ 13 C values were positively correlated ( Fig. 3 ). The difference between zooplankton δ 13 C values and POM δ 13 C values in the five reservoirs was small, indicating that zooplanktons directly utilize POM as a food source. Hou et al. (2013) investigated the relationship between zooplankton δ 13 C values and POM δ 13 C values in eighteen lakes in China and found a positive correlation, also indicating the dependence of zooplankton on POM in their diet.
The phytoplankton community in our study reservoirs is dominated by blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) ( Fig. 2 ). If inedible cyanobacteria are dominant in the phytoplankton community, then zooplankton need to selectively graze for other edible food sources. During cyanobacteria blooms, POM δ 13 C values may be higher than other phytoplankton δ 13 C values (Vuorio et al. 2006). Lee et al. (2010) showed that after an increase in Microcystis abundance, macrozooplankton such as Daphina galeata and C. vicinus disappeared and the microzooplankton ( Bosmina longirostris ) and rotifer populations were significantly reduced in eutrophc lakes (Kim et al. 1999, Lee et al. 2013). In our study, the small difference between zooplankton δ 13 C values and POM δ 13 C values might be explained by differences in the proportion of autochthonous and allochthonous inputs and the isotopic composition of phytoplankton which zooplankton feed on (Cole et al. 2011).
The lower zooplankton δ 13 C values compared to food sources such as bulk POM in these reservoirs is similar to the pattern found for lakes worldwide and reflects the importance of allochthonous inputs (Del Giorgio and France 1996, Grey et al. 2000). Some studies have indicated that the relative depletion in 13 C of pelagic consumers compared to their POM as food source in lake ecosystems reflects the food selectivity of zooplankton for phytoplankton rather than the bulk POM, which has higher δ 13 C values due to the presence of terrestrial detritus (Del Girogio and France 1996, France et al. 1997). Most allochthonous organic matter is more refractory compared to autochthonously produced POM (Tranvik 1989).
In our study, the values of zooplankton δ 13 C and POM δ 13 C values between two reservoirs, MS and JS clearly showed different patterns ( Fig. 3 ). This pattern is similar to the results from Jones et al. (1999) showing that zooplankton δ 13 C values differed with the trophic conditions of the lakes they studied.
In reservoir JS, we found that zooplankton δ 13 C values and POM δ 13 C values were low even though Chl- a concentrations in JS were higher than in the other reservoirs with mostly forest land use. POM can include phytoplankton, allochthonous organic matter, protozoa and bacteria. Phytoplankton δ 13 C values are affected by CO 2 availability, the isotopic composition of CO 2 and growth rate (Doi et al. 2006, Gu et al. 2006). Some studies have found that elevated dissolved CO 2 concentrations and low pH resulted in a low phytoplankton and zooplankton δ 13 C values (Rau 1978, Yoshioka et al. 1994, Lee et al. 2011). Lakes with a high proportion of forest land use in their watersheds such as the four of the reservoirs (JS, BG, JY and KP) in this study are likely to be more heterotrophic ecosystems, receiving considerable inputs of allochthonous organic matter. Other studies have shown that the biomass and productivity of heterotrophic plankton (bacteria and zooplankton) are often much greater than that of phytoplankton (Hessen et al. 1989, Del Giorgio et al. 1997). Many lakes can have high respiration rates of zooplankton and low P/R ratios (the ratio between gross production and community respiration) (Del Giorgio and Peters 1994, Lee et al. 2011). Del Giorgio and Peters (1994) have reported that plankton community respiration was larger than productivity in oligo- and mesotrophic lakes, indicating the importance of external sources of organic matter. Low plankton P/R ratios show the overwhelming contributions of watershed-derived particulate organic matter as a source of CO 2 (Cole et al. 2011). CO 2 produced from the decomposition of terrestrial organic matters might also be expected to have lower plankton δ 13 C values.
In general, a high rate of CO 2 uptake by primary producers will result in an increase in pH and a switch in inorganic C speciation from aqueous carbon dioxide, as a dissolved gas (CO 2(aq) ) to HCO 3 - (Gu et al. 2006). Uptake of respired CO 2(aq) will cause phytoplankton δ 13 C values to become isotopically depleted in 13 C (lower phytoplankton δ 13 C values) compared to it of phytoplankton using inorganic carbon which has not been previously assimilated (Keough et al. 1996, Lee et al. 2011). Rautio and Vincent (2007) showed that regional differences in POM δ 13 C values could be also explained by pH, with primary producer δ 13 C values showing higher values in lakes with high alkalinity and pH than in others. This mechanism could provide a clue for the low zooplankton δ 13 C values in reservoir JS in our study.
Our finding that zooplankton δ 13 C values are negatively related to DOC concentration agrees with results of other studies in humic lakes. Zooplankton δ 13 C values decrease with increasing DOC concentration and increase with increasing productivity and phytoplankton biomass (France et al. 1997, Lennon et al. 2006). Li (2007) also showed that zooplankton δ 13 C values decreased with increasing DOC concentration. This is explained by zooplankton utilization of 13 C-depleted food sources such as methanotrophic bacteria, and therefore, less consumption of phytoplankton and/or POM with higher δ 13 C values. Methanotrophic bacteria can be an important carbon source for filter feeders feeding zooplankton in agricultural reservoirs (Cry 1998). However, in our study, copepods dominated in four agricultural reservoirs, though not in Lake Masan (MS), and utilized preferable particulate organic matter (e.g., phytoplankton).
Some of the methane is oxidized to CO 2 at the metalimnetic oxic-anoxic interface and is partly incorporated into microbial biomass. Phytoplankton can utilize inorganic carbon derived from methanotrophic bacteria, with lower δ 13 C values (as mentioned above). Allochthonous inputs of POM and DOC to reservoirs can be mineralized and affect zooplankton δ 13 C values through the food web. In our study reservoirs, MS, unlike the other reservoirs, is most likely to have a high proportion of DOC derived from autochthonous sources (phytoplankton production).
CONCLUSION
In our study of five agricultural reservoirs (JS, BG, JY, KP and MS), zooplankton δ 13 C showed large variation from -33‰ to -22‰. One eutrophic reservoir, Lake Masan, had a pattern different from the other reservoirs, showing that zooplankton δ 13 C decreased with increasing DOC concentration. With this exception, the results of this study are consistent with results of other studies showing an inverse relationship between zooplankton δ 13 C values and DOC concentrations (France et al. 1997, Jones et al. 1999, Lennon et al. 2006, Persaud et al. 2009). In this study, the difference in zooplankton δ 13 C values between Lake Jusan and Lake Masan is most likely caused by differences in sources of organic matter related to the difference in the land use in the watershed (Jones et al. 1999). Future studies on reservoirs in Korea should further investigate carbon sources and elemental stoichiometry together with stable isotope techniques to understand the relationships between watershed characteristics and trophic conditions.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Center for AquaticEcosystem Restoration of Eco-STAR project (EW 42-08-10) from MOE (Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea).Support from the Environmental Research Instituteat Kangwon National University is also acknowledged.The Department of Environmental Marine Science atHanyang University assisted with isotope analysis. Theconstructive comment from the reviewers are appreciated.
References
APHA, AWWA, WEF 1998 Standard Methods for the Examinationof Water and Wastewater 20th ed American Public Health Association Washington, DC
Browne RA 1981 Lakes as islands: biogeographic distribution, turnover rates, and species composition in thelakes of central New York. J Biogeography 8 75 - 83    DOI : 10.2307/2844594
Chen FZ , Xie P , Tang HJ , Liu H 2005 Negative effects of Microcystisblooms on the crustacean plankton in an enclosureexperiment in the subtropical China. J Environ Sci 17 775 - 781
Cole JJ , Carpenter SR , Kitchell J , Pace ML , Solomon CT , Weidel B 2011 Strong evidence for terrestrial support ofzooplankton in small lakes based on stable isotopes ofcarbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108 1975 - 1980    DOI : 10.1073/pnas.1012807108
Cyr H 1998 Cladoceran- and copepod- dominated zooplanktoncommunities graze at similar rates in low-productivitylakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55 414 - 422    DOI : 10.1139/f97-217
Del Giorgio PA , Cole JJ , Cimbleris A 1997 Respiration ratesin bacteria exceed phytoplankton production in unproductiveaquatic systems. Nature 385 148 - 151    DOI : 10.1038/385148a0
Del Giorgio PA , France RL 1996 Ecosystem-Specific patternsin the relationship between zooplankton and POMor microplankton δ13C. Limnol Oceanogr 41 359 - 365    DOI : 10.4319/lo.1996.41.2.0359
Del Giorgio PA , Peters RH 1994 Patterns in planktonic P:Rratios in lakes: influence of lake trophy and dissolved organiccarbon. Limnol Oceanogr 39 772 - 787    DOI : 10.4319/lo.1994.39.4.0772
De Kluijver A , Yu J , Houtekamer M , Middelburg JJ , Liu Z 2012 Cyanobacteria as a carbon source for zooplanktonin eutrophic Lake Taihu, China, measured by13Clabeling and fatty acid biomarkers. Limnol Oceanogr 57 1245 - 1254    DOI : 10.4319/lo.2012.57.4.1245
Doi H , Zuykova EI , Kikuchi E , Shikano S , Kanou K , Yurlova N , Yadrenkina E 2006 Spatial changes in carbon andnitrogen stable isotopes of the plankton food web in asaline lake ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 571 395 - 400    DOI : 10.1007/s10750-006-0205-1
France RL , Del Giorgio PA , Westcott KA 1997 Productivityand heterotrophy influences on zooplankton δ13C innorthern temperate lakes. Aquat Microb Ecol 12 85 - 93    DOI : 10.3354/ame012085
Grey J , Jones RI , Sleep D 2000 Stable isotope analysis of theorigins of zooplankton carbon in lakes of differing trophicstate. Oecologia 123 232 - 240    DOI : 10.1007/s004420051010
Gu B , Chapman AD , Schelske CL 2006 Factors controllingseasonal variations in stable isotope composition ofparticulate organic matter in a soft water eutrophic lake. Limnol Oceanogr 51 2837 - 2848    DOI : 10.4319/lo.2006.51.6.2837
Gu B , Schell DM , Alexander V 1994 Stable carbon and nitrogenisotope analysis of the plankton food web in a subarcticlake. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51 1338 - 1344    DOI : 10.1139/f94-133
Hessen DO , Andersen T , Lyche A 1989 Differential grazingand resource utilization of zooplankton in a humic lake. Arch Hydrobiol 114 321 - 347
Hessen DO 2008 Efficiency, energy and stoichiometry inpelagic food webs; reciprocal roles of food quality and food quantity. Freshw Rev 1 43 - 57
Hou W , Gu B , Zhang H , Gu J , Han BP 2013 The relationshipbetween carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes ofzooplankton and select environmental variables in lowlatitudereservoirs. Limnology 14 97 - 104    DOI : 10.1007/s10201-012-0388-2
Jeppesen E , Jensen JP , Jensen C , Faafeng B , Hessen DO , Sondergaard M , Lauridsen T , Brettum P , Christoffersen K 2003 The impact of nutrient state and lake depth ontop-down control in the pelagic zone of lakes: a study of466 lakes from the temperate zone to the arctic. Ecosystems 6 313 - 325    DOI : 10.1007/PL00021503
Jones RI , Grey J , Sleep D , Arvola L 1999 Stable isotope analysisof zooplankton carbon nutrition in humic lakes. Oikos 86 97 - 104    DOI : 10.2307/3546573
Kankaala P , Taipale S , Li L , Jones RI 2010 Diets of crustaceanzooplankton, inferred from stable carbon and nitrogenisotope analyses, in lakes with varying allochthonousdissolved organic carbon content. Aquat Ecol 44 781 - 795    DOI : 10.1007/s10452-010-9316-x
Keough JR , Sierszen ME , Hagley CA 1996 Analysis of a LakeSuperior coastal food web with stable isotope techniques. Limnol Oceanogr 41 136 - 146    DOI : 10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0136
Kim B , Choi KS , Lee UH , Kim UH 2000 Effects of the summermonsoon on the distribution and loading of organiccarbon in a deep reservoir, Lake Soyang, Korea. Water Res 14 3495 - 3504    DOI : 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00104-4
Kim B , Kim JO , Jun MS , Hwang SJ 1999 Seasonal dynamicsof phytoplankton and zooplankton community in LakeSoyang. Korean J Limnol 32 127 - 134
Lee J , Kim J , Jung Y , Kim B 2010 Isotopic differences amongzooplankton taxa and seasonal variation of zooplanktoncommunity coexisting with Microcystis. Kor J Ecol Environ (in Korean) 43 1 - 10
Lee J , Yoshioka T , Ra K , Owen J , Kim B 2011 Stable carbonand nitrogen isotope composition of co-existing herbivorouszooplankton species in an oligo-dystrophic lake(Shirakoma-ike, Japan). N Z J Mar Freshw Res 45 29 - 41    DOI : 10.1080/00288330.2010.533377
Lee JY , Kim JK , Owen JS , Choi Y , Shin K , Jung S , Kim B 2013 Variation in carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in POMand zooplankton in a deep reservoir and relationshipwith hydrological characteristics. J Freshw Ecol 28 47 - 62    DOI : 10.1080/02705060.2012.689999
Lennon JT , Faiia AM , Feng X , Cottingham KL 2006 Relativeimportance of CO2recycling and CH4pathways in lakefood webs along a dissolved organic carbon gradient. Limnol Oceanogr 51 1602 - 1613    DOI : 10.4319/lo.2006.51.4.1602
Li L , MS thesis 2007 Variation in zooplankton diets in contrastingsmall lakes, inferred from stable isotope analyses. University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä, Finland MS thesis
Li W , Wu F , Liu C , Fu P , Wang J , Mei Y , Wang L , Guo J 2008 Temporal and spatial distributions of dissolved organiccarbon and nitrogen in two small lakes on southwesternChina Plateau. Limnology 9 163 - 171    DOI : 10.1007/s10201-008-0241-9
Pace M L , Cole JJ , Carpenter SR , Kitchell JF , Hodgson JR , Van de Bogert MC , Bade DL , Kritzberg ES , Bastviken D 2004 Whole lake carbon-13 additions reveal terrestrial supportof aquatic food webs. Nature 427 240 - 243    DOI : 10.1038/nature02227
Persaud AD , Dillon PJ , Lasenby D , Yan ND 2009 Stable isotopevariability of meso-zooplankton along a gradientof dissolved organic carbon. Freshwater Biol 54 1705 - 1719    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02224.x
Rau G 1978 Carbon-13 depletion in a Subalpine Lake: carbonflow Implications. Science 201 901 - 902    DOI : 10.1126/science.201.4359.901
Rautio M , Vincent WF 2007 Isotopic analysis of the sourcesof organic carbon for zooplankton in shallow subarcticand arctic waters. Ecography 30 77 - 87
Rautio M , Mariash H , Forsström L 2011 Seasonal shifts betweenautochthonous and allochthonous carbon contributionsto zooplankton diets in a subarctic lake. Limnol Oceanogr 56 1513 - 1524    DOI : 10.4319/lo.2011.56.4.1513
Salonen K , Hammar T 1986 On the importance of dissolved organic matter in the nutrition of zooplankton in somelake waters. Oecologia 68 246 - 253    DOI : 10.1007/BF00384795
Santana ARA , Lansac-Tôha FA , Benedito E 2009 Variabilityof δ13C and δ15N in three zooplankton species from theupper Paraná River floodplain. Zoologia (Curitiba) 26 725 - 732    DOI : 10.1590/S1984-46702009000400017
Schindler DE , Carpenter SR , Cole JJ , Kitchell JF , Pace ML 1997 Influence of food web structure on carbon exchangebetween lakes and the atmosphere. Science 277 248 - 251    DOI : 10.1126/science.277.5323.248
Tranvik LJ 1989 Bacterioplankton growth, grazing mortalityand quantitative relationship to primary production ina humic and a clearwater lake. J Plankton Res 11 985 - 1000    DOI : 10.1093/plankt/11.5.985
Vuorio K , Meili M , Sarvala J 2006 Taxon-specific variationin the stable isotopic signatures (δ13C and δ15N) of lakephytoplankton. Freshwater Biol 51 807 - 822    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01529.x
Yoshioka T , Wada E , Hayashi H 1994 A stable isotope studyon seasonal food web dynamics in a eutrophic lake. Ecology 75 835 - 846    DOI : 10.2307/1941739