In this paper we discuss a functional approach to obtain a latticelike structure in
d
algebras, and obtain an exact analog of De Morgan law and some other properties.
1. INTRODUCTION
Y. Imai and K. Iséki introduced two classes of abstract algebras: BCKalgebras and
BCI
algebras (
[8
,
9]
).
BCK
algebras have some connections with other areas: D. Mundici
[13]
proved that
MV
algebras are categorically equivalent to bounded commutative
BCK
algebras, and J. Meng
[11]
proved that implicative commutative semigroups are equivalent to a class of
BCK
algebras. It is well known that bounded commutative
BCK
algebras,
D
posets and
MV
algebras are logically equivalent each other (see [4, p. 420]). We refer useful textbooks for
BCK
/
BCI
algebra to
[4
,
6
,
7
,
12
,
17]
. J. Neggers and H. S. Kim (
[14]
) introduced the notion of dalgebras which is a useful generalization of
BCK
algebras, and then investigated several relations between
d
algebras and
BCK
algebras as well as several other relations between
d
algebras and oriented digraphs. J. S. Han et al. (
[5]
) defined a variety of special
d
algebras, such as strong
d
algebras, (weakly) selective
d
algebras and others. The main assertion is that the squared algebra (
X
; □, 0) of a
d
algebra is a
d
algebra if and only if the root (
X
; ∗, 0) of the squared algebra (
X
; □, 0) is a strong
d
algebra. Recently, the present author with H. S. Kim and J. Neggers (
[10]
) explored properties of the set of
d
units of a
d
algebra. It was noted that many
d
algebras are weakly associative, and the existence of nonweakly associative
d
/
BCK
algebras was demonstrated. Moreover, they discussed the notions of a
d
integral domain and a leftinjectivity in
d
/
BCK
algebras. We refer to
[1
,
2
,
15
,
16]
for more information on
d
algebras.
In this paper we discuss a functional approach to obtain a latticelike structure in
d
algebras, and obtain an exact analog of De Morgan law and some other properties.
2. PRELIMINARIES
An (
ordinary
)
d

algebra
(
[14]
) is a nonempty set
X
with a constant 0 and a binary operation “ ∗ ” satisfying the following axioms:

(D1)x∗x= 0,

(D2) 0 ∗x= 0,

(D3)x∗y= 0 andy∗x= 0 implyx=yfor allx,y∈X.
A
BCK
algebra is a
d
algebra
X
satisfying the following additional axioms:

(D4) (x∗y) ∗ (x∗z)) ∗ (z∗y) = 0,

(D5) (x∗ (x∗y)) ∗y= 0 for allx,y,z∈X.
Example 2.1
(
[14]
). Consider the real numbers
R
, and suppose that (
R
; ∗,
e
) has the multiplication
x
∗
y
= (
x
−
y
)(
x
−
e
) +
e
Then
x
∗
x
=
e
;
e
∗
x
=
e
;
x
∗
y
=
y
∗
x
=
e
yields (
x
−
y
)(
x
−
e
) = 0, (
y
−
x
)(
y
−
e
) =
e
and
x
=
y
or
x
=
e
=
y
, i.e.,
x
=
y
, i.e., (
R
; ∗,
e
) is a
d
algebra.
3. A FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TOdALGEBRAS
Let (
X
, ∗, 0) be a
d
algebra. A map
ϕ
:
X
→
X
is said to be
order reversing
if
x
∗
y
= 0 then
ϕ
(
y
) ∗
ϕ
(
x
) = 0 for all
x
,
y
∈
X
;
selfinverse
if
ϕ
(
ϕ
(
x
)) =
x
for all
x
∈
X
; an
antihomomorphism
if
ϕ
(
x
∗
y
) =
ϕ
(
y
) ∗
ϕ
(
x
) = 0 for all
x
,
y
∈
X
; a
homomorphims
if
ϕ
(
x
∗
y
) =
ϕ
(
x
) ∗
ϕ
(
y
) for all
x
,
y
∈
X
.
Example 3.1.
Consider
X
:= {0,
a
, 1} with
Then (
X
; ∗, 0) is a
d
algebra. If we define a map
ϕ
:
X
→
X
by
ϕ
(0) = 1,
ϕ
(
a
) =
a
and
ϕ
(1) = 0, then it is easy to see that
ϕ
is both selfinverse and order reversing, but it is not an antihomomorphism, since
ϕ
(
a
∗1) =
ϕ
(0) = 1 and
ϕ
(1)∗
ϕ
(
a
) = 0∗
a
= 0.
Moreover, it is not a homomorphism, since
ϕ
(0 ∗
a
) =
ϕ
(0) = 1 ≠
a
= 1 ∗
a
=
ϕ
(0) ∗
ϕ
(
a
).
Proposition 3.2.
Let
(
X
, ∗, 0)
be a dalgebra
.
If ϕ
:
X
→
X
is a (anti) homomorphism, then ϕ
(0) = 0.
Proof
. Since
X
is a
d
algebra, by (
D
1), we obtain
ϕ
(0) =
ϕ
(
x
∗
x
) =
ϕ
(
x
) ∗
ϕ
(
x
) = 0.
Proposition 3.3.
If
(
X
, ∗, 0) i
s a dalgebra, then every anti homomorphism is order reversing
.
Proof
. Let
ϕ
:
X
→
X
be an antihomomorphism. If we assume that
x
∗
y
= 0, then
ϕ
(
y
) ∗
ϕ
(
x
) =
ϕ
(
x
∗
y
) =
ϕ
(0) = 0 by Proposition 3.2. This proves the proposition.
Remark.
The converse of Proposition 3.3 need not be true in general. In Example 3.1, the mapping
ϕ
is an order reversing, but not an antihomomorphism.
Let (
X
, ∗, 0) be a
d
algebra and let
ϕ
:
X
→
X
be a map. We denote by 1 :=
ϕ
(0).
Proposition 3.4.
Let
(
X
, ∗, 0)
be a dalgebra and let ϕ
:
X
→
X be both order reversing and selfinverse
.
Then
(
X
, ∗, 0)
is bounded.
Proof
. Given
x
∈
X
, we have

x∗ 1 =x∗ϕ(0) [1 =ϕ(0)]

=ϕ(ϕ(x)) ∗ϕ(0) [ϕ: selfinverse]

= 0 [ϕ: order reversing]
Let (
X
, ∗, 0) be a
d
algebra. We define a relation “≤” on
X
by
x
≤
y
if and only if
x
∗
y
= 0 for all
x
,
y
∈
X
. Note that the relation ≤ need not be a partial order on
X
. We define a relation “∧ on
X
by
x
∧
y
:=
x
∗ (
x
∗
y
)) for all
x
,
y
∈
X
.
Proposition 3.5.
Let
(
X
, ∗, 0)
be a dalgebra
.
If ϕ
:
X
→
X is selfinverse
,
then ϕ
(1) = 0.
Proof
. It follows from
ϕ
is selfinverse that 0 =
ϕ
(
ϕ
(0)) =
ϕ
(1).
Theorem 3.6.
Let
(
X
, ∗, 0)
be a dalgebra and let ϕ
:
X
→
X be a selfinverse map
.
If we define x
∨
y
:=
ϕ
[
ϕ
(
y
) ∧
ϕ
(
x
)],
then
ϕ
(
x
∧
y
) =
ϕ
(
y
) ∨
ϕ
(
x
)
for all x
,
y
∈
X
.
Proof
. Given
x
,
y
∈
X
, we have

ϕ(x∧y) =ϕ[ϕ(ϕ(x)) ∧ϕ(ϕ(y))] [ϕ: selfinverse]

=ϕ[ϕ(a)) ∧ϕ(b)] [a=ϕ(x),b=ϕ(y)]

=b∨a

=ϕ(y) ∨ϕ(x)
Theorem 3.6 shows that the first De Morgan’s law implies the analog of the second De Morgan’s law and conversely, since
x
∨
y
≠
y
∨
x
in general. Moreover, it follows that
x
∧
y
=
ϕ
(
ϕ
(
x
∧
y
)) =
ϕ
[
ϕ
(
y
) ∨
ϕ
(
x
)] for all
x
,
y
∈
X
.
Theorem 3.7.
Let
(
X
, ∗, 0)
be a dalgebra with
for all x
∈
X
.
If ϕ
:
X
→
X is a selfinverse map
,
then x
∨
x
=
x and x
∧
x
=
x for all x
∈
X
.
Proof
. (i). Given
x
∈
X
, we have

x∨x=ϕ[ϕ(x) ∧ϕ(x)] [Theorem 3.6]

=ϕ[ϕ(x) ∗ (ϕ(x) ∗ϕ(x)]

=ϕ(ϕ(x) ∗ 0) [(D1)]

=ϕ(ϕ(x)) [(1)]

=x[ϕ: selfinverse]
(ii).
x
∧
x
=
x
∗ (
x
∗
x
) =
x
∗ 0 =
x
.
Proposition 3.8.
Let
(
X
, ∗, 0)
be a dalgebra with
for all x
,
y
,
z
∈
X
.
Then x
∧
y
≤
x and x
∧
y
≤
y for all x
,
y
∈
X
.
Proof
. (i). Given
x
,
y
∈
X
, by applying (2), we obtain

(x∧y) ∗a= (x∗ (x∗y)) ∗a

= (x∗x) ∗ (x∗y)

= 0 ∗ (x∗y)

= 0
(ii). Given
x
,
y
∈
X
, we have (
x
∧
y
)∗
y
= (
x
∗(
x
∗
y
))∗
y
= (
x
∗
y
)∗(
x
∗
y
) = 0.
Theorem 3.9.
Let
(
X
, ∗, 0)
be a dalgebra with the condition
(
2
).
If ϕ
:
X
→
X is a selfinverse antihomomorphism
,
then x
∗ (
x
∨
y
) = 1
and y
∗ (
x
∨
y
) = 1 f
or all x
,
y
∈
X
.
Proof
. (i). Since
ϕ
:
X
→
X
is a selfinverse antihomomorphism, for all
x
,
y
∈
X
, we obtain

x∗ (x∨y) =x∗ϕ(ϕ(y) ∧ϕ(x))

=x∗ϕ[ϕ(y) ∗ (ϕ(y) ∗ϕ(x))]

=ϕ(ϕ(x)) ∗ϕ[ϕ(y) ∗ (ϕ(y) ∗ϕ(x))]

=ϕ[[ϕ(y) ∗ (ϕ(y) ∗ϕ(x))] ∗ϕ(x)]

=ϕ[[(ϕ(y) ∗ϕ(x)) ∗ (ϕ(y) ∗ϕ(x))]]

=ϕ(0)

= 1
and

y∗ (x∨y) =ϕ(ϕ(x)) ∗ϕ[ϕ(y) ∗ (ϕ(y) ∗ϕ(x))]

=ϕ[[ϕ(y) ∗ (ϕ(y) ∗ϕ(x))] ∗ϕ(y)]

=ϕ[(ϕ(y) ∗ϕ(y)) ∗ (ϕ(y) ∗ϕ(x))]

=ϕ(0)

= 1
CONCLUSION
Whether such functions exists or not depends on the special properties of the
d
algebras.
BCK
algebras have the partial order structure, but
d
algebras have no such a structure and so we need to seek another conditions for obtaining the analog of structures in
d
algebras. This kind of functional approach can be connected with mirror
d
algebras discussed in
[3]
in a new direction.
View Fulltext
Allen P.J.
,
Kim H.S.
,
Neggers J.
2007
On companion dalgebras
Math. Slovaca
57
93 
106
Allen P.J.
,
Kim H.S.
,
Neggers J.
2004
Lup and mirror algebras
Sci. Math. Japonica.
59
605 
612
Dvurečenskij A.
,
Pulmannová S.
2009
New Trends in Quantum Structures
Kluwer Academic Pub.
Dordrecht
Han J.S.
,
Kim H.S.
,
Neggers J. J.
2010
Strong and ordinary dalgebras
Multi.Valued Logic & Soft Computing
16
331 
339
Huang Y.
2003
BCIalgebras
Science Press
Beijing
Iorgulescu A.
2008
Algebras of Logic as BCKalgebras
Editura ASE
Bucharest
Iséki K.
1980
On BCIalgebras
Math. Seminar Notes
8
125 
130
Iséki K.
,
Tanaka S.
1978
An introduction to theory of BCKalgebras
Math. Japonica
23
1 
26
Kim H.S.
,
Neggers J.
,
So K.S.
2012
Some aspects of dunits in d/BCKalgebras
Jour. of Applied Math.
Article ID 141684
2012
Meng J.
1995
Implicative commutative semigroups are equivalent to a class of BCKalgebras
Semigroup Forum
50
89 
96
DOI : 10.1007/BF02573506
Meng J.
,
Jun Y. B.
1994
BCKalgebras
Kyungmoon Sa
Korea
Mundici D.
1986
MV algebras are categorically equivalent to bounded commutative BCKalgebras
Math. Japonica
31
889 
894
Neggers J.
,
Kim H.S.
1999
On dalgebras
Math. Slovaca
49
19 
26
Neggers J.
,
Dvureećenskij A.
,
Kim H.S.
2000
On dfuzzy functions in dalgebras
Foundation of Physics
30
1805 
1815
Neggers J.
,
Jun Y.B.
,
Kim H.S.
1999
On dideals in dalgebras
Math. Slovaca
49
243 
251
Yisheng H.
2006
BCIalgebras
Science Press
Beijing