A FAST AND ROBUST NUMERICAL METHOD FOR OPTION PRICES AND GREEKS IN A JUMP-DIFFUSION MODEL

DARAE JEONG
,
YOUNG ROCK KIM
,
SEUNGGYU LEE
,
YONGHO CHOI
,
WOONG-KI LEE
,
JAE-MAN SHIN
,
HYO-RIM AN
,
HYEONGSEOK HWANG
,
HJUNSEOK KIM

The Pure and Applied Mathematics.
2015.
May,
22(2):
159-168

- Received : December 05, 2014
- Accepted : February 06, 2015
- Published : May 31, 2015

Download

PDF

e-PUB

PubReader

PPT

Export by style

Share

Article

Metrics

Cited by

TagCloud

Abstract. We propose a fast and robust finite difference method for Merton's jump diffusion model, which is a partial integro-differential equation. To speed up a computational time, we compute a matrix so that we can calculate the non-local integral term fast by a simple matrix-vector operation. Also, we use non-uniform grids to increase efficiency. We present numerical experiments such as evaluation of the option prices and Greeks to demonstrate a performance of the proposed numerical method. The computational results are in good agreements with the exact solutions of the jump-diffusion model.
where
x
is the underlying asset,
t
is the time,
u
(
x
,
t
) is the value of an option at
t
on
x
,
σ
is the volatility, and
r
is the risk neutral interest rate. According to the Merton’s jump-diffusion model based on a Poisson process
[10]
, we are able to describe as the following equation:
dx
/
x
= (
µ
−
λk
)
dt
+
σdW
+ (
η
− 1)
dU
, where
dW
is the standard Brownian motion and
dU
is a Poisson process of intensity
λ
, i.e.,
dU
is 0 or 1 with probability 1 −
λdt
or
λdt
, respectively. Here
η
is taken to be a lognormally distributed jump amplitude with probability density
where
k
is the expectation 𝔼(
η
−1) given by
e
^{0.5δ2}
. Since the Brownian motion and Poisson process are supposed to be uncorrelated, the asset price jumps from
x
to
xe^{ξ}
if a jump occurs. Then, we are able to get a partial integro-differential equation given by
where
The authors in
[2]
proposed implicit-explicit Runge–Kutta methods for the time integration to solve the integral term explicitly, giving higher-order accuracy schemes under weak stability time-step restrictions. Kwon and Lee developed a second-order convergent finite difference method to solve partial integro-differential equations which describe the behavior of option prices under jump-diffusion models
[8]
. This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we describe the proposed numerical scheme in detail. In Section 3, we present numerical experiments to validate accuracy and efficiency of our proposed algorithm. In Section 4, conclusions are drawn.
2.1. Discretization with finite differences
We will use a finite difference method We will use a finite difference method
[5]
to numerically solve Eq. (1.1). By changing variable
τ
=
T
−
t
, where T is maturity, we can rewrite Eq. (1.1) as follows:
The jump-diffusion equation is discretized on a grid defined by
x
_{0}
= 0 and
x
_{i+1}
=
x_{i}
+
h_{i}
for
i
= 0, · · · ,
N_{x}
− 1, where
N_{x}
is the number of grid intervals and
h_{i}
is the grid spacing, see
Fig. 1
. And we assume that
x_{Nx}
=
S
_{max}
,
x
_{Nx+1}
=
S
_{max}
+
h
_{Nx−1}
, and
x
_{Nx+2}
=
eS
_{max}
. Let us denote the numerical approximation of the solution by
, where ∆
τ
=
T
/
N_{τ}
is the time-step size and
N_{τ}
is the total number of time-steps. By applying an implicit scheme to Eq. (2.1), we have
A non-uniform grid.
where the first and second derivatives are defined as
and
is an approximate numerical quadrature of
. Using the composite Simpson’s rule, we can rewrite Eq. (2.2) as
where
We impose the zero Dirichlet boundary condition at
x
= 0 and the linear boundary condition at
x
=
S
_{max}
[13]
. The matrix form of the linear system (2.3) can be rewritten as
We solve the linear system by using the Thomas algorithm, which inverts a tridiagonal matrix directly. Next, we consider the numerical quadrature of the following integral term
To evaluate the integral term (2.4), we truncate the infinite domain (−∞, ∞) to [
a
,
b
]. Let us consider [
a
,
b
] = [−1, 1] case to be concrete. Therefore we use the composite Simpson’s rule for the numerical integration.
where
M
is a positive even integer.
Figure 2(a)
shows a schematic illustration of the option price
u
(
x
,
τ
) and
G
(
xe^{ξ}
) function.
(a) Schematic illustration of the option price u (x , τ ) and G (x_{i}e^{ξ} ) function. (b) Linear interpolation of u (x , τ ) at x = x_{i}e^{ξj}
To accelerate the computation, we save the linear interpolation factors at each point
x_{i}
before the main time-step iterations. The factor matrix A is defined as
where
m
_{i,j}
= (
x_{i}e^{ξj}
−
x_{ij}
) /
h_{ij}
,
x_{ij}
≤
x_{i}e^{ξj}
<
x_{ij+1}
, for some 0 ≤
i_{j}
≤
N_{x}
+ 1. Then, we have
which is schematically illustrated in
Fig. 2(b)
.
3.1. European call option
We consider a European call option whose payoff is given as
u
(
x
, 0) = max(
x
−
K
, 0), where
K
is strike price. We will use
K
= 100,
r
= 0.03,
σ
= 0.3,
λ
= 0.1,
δ
= 0.1, and uniform grid sizes
h
unless otherwise specified. Closed-form solution
u
_{exact}
(
x
,
t
) of jump-diffusion model for European call option is formulated as an infinite series of Black, Scholes, and Merton’s model
[1
,
10]
:
where
We sum Eq. (3.1) up to
n
= 200.
Figure 3
shows the payoff function and two numerical solutions at
τ
= 1 with the BS and the BS with jump-diffusion models. Here, we take
h
= 1 and ∆
τ
= 1/360. The result shows that the option values with the jump-diffusion model are larger than those with the BS model without the jump-diffusion.
Payoff function and two numerical solutions at τ = 1 with the BS and the BS with jump-diffusion models.
3.2. Effect of interval size on the numerical quadrature
To find a suitable interval [−
b
,
b
] for numerical integration, we test the effect of
b
on the results with
M
= 50.
Figure 4
shows the numerical solutions at
τ
= 1 with various values of
b
, such as 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.8, 1, and 2. The result suggests that
b
= 1 is accurate enough. Therefore, we will use [−1, 1] in the calculation of the integral term (2.5) from now on.
Numerical solutions at τ = 1 with various values of b , such as, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.8, 1, and 2.
3.3. Convergence test
We perform a convergence test to verify the accuracy of the proposed numerical method in this paper. In this test, we use the following parameters:
S
_{max}
= 300, and
T
= 1. The numerical solutions are computed with the uniform grids
h
= 2
^{2−n}
and the uniform time-steps ∆
τ
= 250
h
^{2}
for
n
= 1, 2, and 3. We denote the error as
e
=
u
−
u
_{exact}
, where
u
and
u
_{exact}
are the numerical and analytic solutions, respectively. And we calculate its discrete
l
_{2}
-norm error as
Table 1
shows the
l
_{2}
-norm errors and convergence rates for numerical solutions with respect to
h
. This result indicates that the scheme is first-order accurate in time and second-order accurate in space.
l _{2}-norm errors and convergence rates for numerical solutions on uniform grid with respect to h .
3.4. Computation of the Greeks
We compute the Greeks by using the proposed scheme and compare them with the closed-form solutions. Delta (∆) is the first derivative with respect to the underlying asset
x
.
Gamma (Γ) is the second derivative with respect to the underlying asset
x
.
Vega (
V
) is the derivative with respect to volatility
σ
.
Rho (
ρ
) is the derivative with respect to the risk-free interest rate
r
.
Theta (Θ) is the derivative with respect to the time
t
.
The parameters used in the calculations of numerical and closed-form solutions are as follows: ∆
σ
= 0.1, ∆
r
= 0.01, ∆
t
= 1/360,
S
_{max}
= 300, and
h
= 1 on uniform grid.
Figure 5
(a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) are the results of ∆, Γ,
V
,
ρ
, and Θ from the numerical and closed-form solutions, respectively.
Comparison between the numerical and closed-form solutions for the Greeks. (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) are the results of ∆, Γ, V , ρ , and Θ, respectively.
3.5. Efficiency of non-uniform grid
In this section, we show the efficiency of non-uniform grid on jump-diffusion model. We first evaluate the numerical solution with
S
_{max}
= 600,
N_{x}
= 4800 and
N_{τ}
= 1440 on uniform grid. The following
Table 2
represents the
l
_{2}
-norm error and relative CPU time on uniform and non-uniform grids, respectively
Comparison with l _{2}-norm error on the interval [80, 120] and relative CPU time for numerical solutions on uniform and non-uniform grid.
Here,
l
_{2}
-norm error is evaluated on the interval [80, 120], which is indicated a neighborhood of the exercise price 100. And we have numerical solution on non-uniform grid, which is defined as
x = [0 1.11 : 1.11 : 38.89 40 : 0.25 : 160 164.89 : 4.89 : 595.11 600].
In
Table 2
, 1 in CPU time of uniform grid stands for the relative calculation time for uniform grid. And the CPU time of non-uniform grid is scaled with that of the uniform grid. Through this test, we can confirm that non-uniform grid is more efficient than the uniform grid.
A
in (2.6) so that we can calculate the non-local integral term fast by a simple matrix-vector operation. Also, we used non-uniform grids to increase efficiency. We presented numerical experiments such as evaluation of the option prices and the Greeks to demonstrate the performance of the proposed numerical method. The computational results were in good agreements with the exact solutions of the jump-diffusion model.

jump-diffusion
;
Simpson's rule
;
non-uniform grid
;
implicit finite difference method
;
derivative securities.

1. INTRODUCTION

The derivative securities pricing abilities of the jump-diffusion option pricing model generally provide more efficient and robust valuation
[7
,
11]
. The Black–Scholes (BS) model, proposed by Fischer Black and Myron Scholes in 1973
[1]
, is a mathematical method for option price and is given by
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

2. NUMERICAL SOLUTION

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

3. NUMERICAL EXPERIMENT

In this section, we perform various numerical tests to show efficiency and robustness of the proposed numerical scheme under the jump-diffusion model. All computations were run in MATLAB version 7.7
[12]
.
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

l2-norm errors and convergence rates for numerical solutions on uniform grid with respect toh.

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

Comparison withl2-norm error on the interval [80, 120] and relative CPU time for numerical solutions on uniform and non-uniform grid.

PPT Slide

Lager Image

4. CONCLUSIONS

In this paper, we presented an efficient, fast, and robust finite difference method for the valuation of European call options with jump-diffusion processes. The mathematical model for the process is a partial integro-differential equation (1.1), Merton’s jump diffusion model. To speed up the computational time, we computed the factor matrix
Acknowledgements

The corresponding author (J.S. Kim) was supported by The Small and Medium Business Administration.

Black F.
,
Scholes M.
1973
The pricing of options and corporate liabilities
J. Polit. Econ.
81
637 -
654
** DOI : 10.1086/260062**

Briani M.
,
Natalini R.
,
Russo G.
2007
Implicit-explicit numerical schemes for jump-diffusion processes
Calcolo
44
(1)
33 -
57
** DOI : 10.1007/s10092-007-0128-x**

Carr P.
,
Cousot L.
2011
A PDE approach to jump-diffusions
Quant. Fin.
11
(1)
33 -
52
** DOI : 10.1080/14697688.2010.531042**

Cheang G.
,
Chiarella C.
2011
A modern view on Merton’s jump-diffusion model
Quant.Fin. Res. Cent.
287

Duffy D.J.
2006
Finite Difference methods in financial engineering: a Partial Differential Equation approach
John Wiley & Sons

Feng L.
,
Linetsky V.
2008
Pricing options in jump-diffusion models: an extrapolation approach
Oper. Res.
56
(2)
304 -
325
** DOI : 10.1287/opre.1070.0419**

Kremer J.W.
,
Roenfeldt R.L.
1993
Warrant pricing: jump-diffusion vs. Black-Scholes
J. Finan. Quant. Anal.
28
(2)
255 -
272
** DOI : 10.2307/2331289**

Kwon Y.H.
,
Lee Y.
2011
A second-order finite difference method for option pricing under jump-diffusion models
SIAM J. Numer. Anal.
49
(6)
2598 -
2617
** DOI : 10.1137/090777529**

Lee S.
,
Li Y.
,
Choi Y.
,
Hwang H.
,
Kim J.
2014
Accurate and efficient computations for the Greeks of European multi-asset options
J. KSIAM
18
(1)
61 -
74

Merton R.C.
1976
Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous
J. Polit. Econ.
3
(1)
125 -
144

Tankov P.
2003
Financial modelling with jump processes
CRC press

1998
Using MATLAB
The MathWorks Inc.
Natick, MA
http://www.mathworks.com

Windcliff H.
,
Forsyth P.A.
,
Vetzal K.R.
2004
Analysis of the stability of the linear boundary condition for the Black-Scholes equation
J. Comput. Fin.
8
65 -
92

Citing 'A FAST AND ROBUST NUMERICAL METHOD FOR OPTION PRICES AND GREEKS IN A JUMP-DIFFUSION MODEL
'

@article{ SHGHCX_2015_v22n2_159}
,title={A FAST AND ROBUST NUMERICAL METHOD FOR OPTION PRICES AND GREEKS IN A JUMP-DIFFUSION MODEL}
,volume={2}
, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmeb.2015.22.2.159}, DOI={10.7468/jksmeb.2015.22.2.159}
, number= {2}
, journal={The Pure and Applied Mathematics}
, publisher={Korean Society of Mathematical Education}
, author={JEONG, DARAE
and
KIM, YOUNG ROCK
and
LEE, SEUNGGYU
and
CHOI, YONGHO
and
LEE, WOONG-KI
and
SHIN, JAE-MAN
and
AN, HYO-RIM
and
HWANG, HYEONGSEOK
and
KIM, HJUNSEOK}
, year={2015}
, month={May}