The principal object of this paper is to study a class of matrix polynomials associated with Humbert polynomials. These polynomials generalize the well known class of Gegenbauer, Legendre, Pincherl, Horadam, HoradamPethe and Kinney polynomials. We shall give some basic relations involving the Humbert matrix polynomials and then take up several generating functions, hypergeometric representations and expansions in series of matrix polynomials.
1. Introduction and Notations
Gould
[6]
(see also
[11]
) presented a systematic study of an interesting generalization of Humbert, Gegenbauer and several other polynomial systems defined by
where
m
is a positive integer, ｜
t
｜ < 1 and other parameters are unrestricted in general. For the table of main special cases of (1.1), including Gegenbauer, Legendre, Tchebycheff, Pincherle, Kinney and Humbert polynomials, see Gould
[6]
. In
[10]
Milovanovic and Dordevic considered the polynomials
defined by the generating function
where
m
∈ ℕ := {1, 2, 3,...}, ｜
t
｜ < 1 and λ >
The explicit form of the polynomial
(
x
) is
where the Pochhammer symbol is defined by (λ)
n
=
= λ(λ + 1)...(λ +
n
−1), (∀
n
≥ 1) and (λ)
_{0}
= 1.Г(.) : is the familiar Gamma function.
Note that
where
(
x
) are Gegenbauer polynomials
[12]
. The set of polynomials denoted by
(x) considered by Sinha
[17]
is precisely a generalization of
(
x
) defined and studied by Shreshtha
[16]
. In
[14]
the authors investigated Gegenbauer matrix polynomials defined by
where
A
is a positive stable matrix in the complex space ℂ
^{N×N}
, ℂ bing the set of complex numbers, of all square matrices of common order
N
. The explicit representation of the Gegenbauer matrix polynomials
(
x
) has been given in
[14
, p. 104 (15)] in the form
In the last decade the study of matrix polynomials has been made more systematic with the consequence that many basic results of scalar orthogonality have been extended to the matrix case (see, for example
[1]

[5]
and
[13]
). We say that a matrix
A
in ℂ
^{N×N}
is a positive stable if Re(λ) > 0 for all λ ∈ 𝜎(
A
) where 𝜎(
A
) is the set of all eigenvalues of
A.
If
A
_{0}
,
A
_{1}
, ... ,
A
_{n}
... , are elements of ℂ
^{N×N}
and
A
_{n}
≠ 0, then we call

P(x) =Anxn+An−1xn−1+An−2xn−2+...+A1x+A0,
a matrix polynomial of degree
n
in
x
. If
A
+
n
I
is invertible for every integer
n
≥ 0 then
Thus we have
The hypergeometric matrix function
where
A
,
B
and
C
are matrices in ℂ
^{N×N}
such that
C
+
nI
is invertible for integer
n
≥ 0 and ｜
z
｜ < 1. The generalized hypergeometric matrix function (see (1.9)) is given in the form:
For the purpose of this work we recall the following relations
[12]
:
and
Also, we recall that if
A
(
k
,
n
) and
B
(
k
,
n
) are matrices in ℂ
^{N×N}
for
n
≥ 0 and
k
≥ 0 then it follows that
[18]
:
For
m
a positive integer, we can write
The primary goal of this work is to introduce and study a new class of matrix polynomials, namely the Humbert Matrix polynomials
(
x
,
y
;
a
,
b
,
c
), which is general enough to account for many of polynomials involved in generalized potential problems (see
[9]

[11]
). This is interesting since, as will be shown, the matrix polynomials
(
x
,
y
;
a
,
b
,
c
) is an extension to the matrix framework of the classical families of the polynomials mentioned above.
2. Humbert Matrix Polynomials
Let
A
be a positive stable matrix in ℂ
^{N×N}
. We define the Humbert matrix polynomials by means of the generating relation
where
m
is a positive integer and other parameters are unrestricted in general. Based on (1.11) and (1.12), formula (2.1) can be written in the form
which, in view of (1.15), gives us
By equating the coefficients of
t
^{n}
in (2.2), we obtain an explicit representation for the polynomials
(
x
,
y
;
a
,
b
,
c
) in the form
Again, starting from (2.1), it is easily seen that
which, with the help of the results (1.11) and (1.12), gives
By equating the coefficients of
t
^{n}
in (2.4), we obtain another explicit representation for the polynomials
(
x
,
y
;
a
,
b
,
c
) as follows:
According to the relation
Equation (2.5) can be written in the form
where
A
+
+ (
n
−
k
(
m
− 2)
s
)
I
and 2
A
+ (
n
− (
m
− 2)
s
)
I
are invertible.
Now, we mention some interesting special cases of our results of this section. First, if in (2.3) and (2.5) we let
y
= 0,
a
=
m
and
c
= 1 = −
b
, we get
and
respectively, where
is the matrix version of Humbert polynomials
( see
[11]
).
Next, for
m
= 3, Equations (2.8) and (2.9) further reduce to following explicit representations:
and
respectively, where
(
x
) is the matrix version of Pincherle polynomials
P
_{n}
(
x
)
[11]
. Moreover, in view of the relationship ( see Equations (1.5) and (2.1) )
equation (2.3) reduces to finite series representation for the matrix Gegenbauer polynomials
(
x
) as follows:
Note that equation (2.12) is a known result (see
[14, p. 109 (40)]
).
3. Hypergeometric Matrix Representations
Starting from (2.3) and using the results
and
where
we get
which, in view of (1.16), gives us the following hypergeometric matrix representation:
where
A
+
nI
and
are invertible. According to the relationship (2.12), Equation (3.4), yields the following known representation for the Gegenbauer matrix polynomials
(see
[14, p. 109 (39)]
):
Next, if in (3.4) we put
a
=
m
,
c
= 1 = −
b
and
y
= 0, we get the following representation for the matrix Humbert polynomials
(
x
):
4. More Generating Functions
By proceeding in a fashion similar to that in Section 2, in this section we aim at establishing the following additional generating functions for the Humbert matrix polynomilas
(
x
,
y
;
a
,
b
,
c
) :
where
A
+
nI
,
B
+
nI
, 2
A
+ (
n
+ 2
k
)
I
+ ((
m
− 2)
s
)
I
,
B
+ (
n
+ 2
k
)
I
,
and
are invertible matrices.
Derivation of the results (4.1) to (4.4)
. Starting from (2.3) and using the results (1.14) and (3.1), we get
which, on using the definition of the generalized matrix hypergeometric series (1.10), gives us the generating function (4.1). This completes the proof of (4.1).
If
B
is a positve stable matrix in the complex space ℂ
^{N×N}
of all square matrices of common order
N
, then following the method of derivation of equation (4.1) , we can easily establish relation (4.2).
Again, starting from (2.5), and employing the results (2.6) and (1.16), we can derive the result (4.3). The proof of Equation (4.4) is similar to that of (4.3). Therefore, we skip the details.
It is easy to observe that the main results (4.1) to (4.4) give a number of generating functions of matrix version polynomials, for example, the matrix polynomials
(
x
) (see (1.2)), the matrix versions of Pincherle, Humbert, Sinha, Sheshtha, Kinney, Horadam and HoradamPethe polynomials (see
[13]
).
5. Expansions
Expansion for the matrix polynomials
(
x
,
y
;
a
,
b
,
c
) in series of Legendre, Hermite, Gegenbauer and Laguerre polynomials relevant to our present investigation are given as follows:
where 2
A
+ (
n
+
s
)
I
and
A
+ (
n
+
s
−
k
)
I
+
are invertible matrices.
Derivation of the results (5.1) to (5.4).
On inserting the result ( see
[12, p. 181 (4)]
)
in relation (2.7) , we get
which on using the result (1.16),and simplifying gives us (5.1). Similarly, the results (5.2), (5.3) and (5.4) are obtained by using the known results
[12, p. 283 (36), p. 194 (4), p. 207 (2)]
and
respectively, instead of (5.5).
Acknowledgements
The authors’ would like to express their thanks to the reviewers for helpful suggestions and comments towards the improvement of this paper.The first author M.A. Pathan would like to thank the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, for the financial assistance for this work under project number SR/S4/MS:794/12.
Aktas R
2014
A Note on multivariable Humbert matrix Polynomials
Gazi University journal of science
27
(2)
747 
754
Aktas R
2013
A New multivariable extension of Humbert matrix Polynomials
AIP Conference Proceedings
1558
1128 
1131
Aktas R
,
Cekim B
,
Sahin R
2012
The matrix version of the multivariable Humbert matrix Polynomials
Miskolc Mathematical Notes
13
(2)
197 
208
Batahan R.S
2006
A New extension of Hermite matrix Polynomials and its applications
LinearAlgebra Appl.
419
82 
92
Dattoli G
,
Ermand B
,
Riccl P.E
2004
Matrix Evolution equation and special functions
computer and mathematics with Appl.
48
1611 
1617
DOI : 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.03.007
Horadam A
1985
Polynomials associated with Gegenbauer Polynomials
Fibonacci Quart.
23
295 
399
Horadan A
,
Pethe S
1981
Gegenbauer polynomials revisited
Fibonacci Quart.
19
393 
398
Jodar L
,
Defez E
1998
On Some properties of Humbert’s polynomials II
Facta Universityis (Nis) ser. Math.
6
13 
17
Milovanovic G.V
,
Dordevic G.B
1991
A connection between laguerre”s and Hermite’s matrix polynomials
Appl. Math. Lett.
11
23 
30
Pathan M.A
,
Khan M.A
1997
on Polynomials associated with Humbents polynomials. publications DEL, Intitut Mathematique, Noavelle seris 62
53 
62
Rainville E.D
1960
Special function. publications DEL, Intitut Mathematique, Noavelle seris
Macmillan
New York
Sastre J
,
Defez E
,
Jodar L
2006
Laguerre matrix polynomials
series expansion: theory and computer applications, Mathematical and computer Modelling
44
1025 
1043
Sayyed K.A
,
Metwally M.S
,
Batahn R.S
2004
Gegenbauer matrix polynomials and second order Matrix Differential Equations
Div., Math.
12
101 
115
Sayyed K.A
,
Metwally M.S
,
Batahn R.S
2003
On generalized Hermite matrix polynomials
Electronic Journal of linear Algebra
10
272 
279
Shrestha N.B
1977
Polynomial associated with Legendre polynomials
Nepali , Yath. Sci. Rep. Triv.
2
(1)
1 
7
Sinha S.K
1989
On a polynomial associated with Gegenbauer polynomial
Proc. Not. Acad. Sci. India
54
439 
455
Srivastava H.M
,
Manocha H.L
1984
A treatise on Generating functions
Halsted press, John Wiley and Sons
New York