TRIPLED FIXED POINT THEOREM FOR HYBRID PAIR OF MAPPINGS UNDER GENERALIZED NONLINEAR CONTRACTION

The Pure and Applied Mathematics.
2014.
Feb,
21(1):
23-38

- Received : August 02, 2013
- Accepted : November 25, 2013
- Published : February 28, 2014

Download

PDF

e-PUB

PubReader

PPT

Export by style

Article

Metrics

Cited by

TagCloud

In this paper, we introduce the concept of ω - compatibility and weakly commutativity for hybrid pair of mappings
F : X × X × X × → 2^{X}
and
g : X → X
and establish a common tripled fixed point theorem under generalized nonlinear contraction. An example is also given to validate our result. We improve, extend and generalize various known results.
X, d
) be a metric space and
CB
(
X
) be the set of all nonempty closed bounded subsets of
X
. Let
D
(
x, A
) denote the distance from
x
to
A
⊂ X and
H
denote the Hausdorff metric induced by
d
, that is,
and for all A, B ∈ CB (X ).
Markin
[23]
initiated the study of fixed points for multivalued contractions and non-expansive maps using the Hausdorff metric. Fixed points existence for various multivalued contractive mappings has been studied by several authors under different conditions. For details, we refer the reader to
[1
,
2
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
,
16
,
18
,
19
,
20
,
21
,
25
,
26
,
27]
and the reference therein. Multivalued maps theory has application in control theory, convex optimization, differential equations and economics.
Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham
[10]
, established some coupled fixed point theorems and apply these to study the existence and uniqueness of solution for periodic boundary value problems. Lakshmikantham and Ciric
[22]
proved coupled coinci-dence and common coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractive mappings in partially ordered complete metric spaces and extended the results of Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham
[10]
.
Berinde and Borcut
[8]
introduced the concept of tripled fixed point for single valued mappings in partially ordered metric spaces. In
[8]
, Berinde and Borcut established the existence of tripled fixed point of single-valued mappings in partially ordered metric spaces. For more details on tripled fixed point theory, we also refer the reader to
[3
,
4
,
5
,
6
,
7
,
9
,
11]
: Samet and Vetro
[24]
introduced the notion of fixed point of N order in case of single-valued mappings. In particular for N=3 (tripled case), we have the following definition:
Definition 1.1
(
[24]
). Let
X
be a non-empty set and
F :
X
×
X
×
X
→
X
be a given mapping. An element (
x, y, z
) ∈
X
×
X
×
X
is called
a tripled fixed point
of the mapping
F
if
F (x, y, z ) = x, F (y, z, x ) = y and F (z, x, y ) = z .
In this paper, we prove a common tripled fixed point for hybrid pair of mappings under generalized nonlinear contraction. We improve, extend and generalize the results of Ding, Li and Radenovic
[17]
and Abbas, Ciric, Damjanovic and Khan
[2]
. The effectiveness of the present work is validated with the help of suitable example.
Definition 2.1.
Let
X
be a nonempty set,
F
:
X
×
X
×
X
→ 2
^{X}
(a collection of all nonempty subsets of
X
) and
g
be a self-map on
X
. An element (
x, y, z
)∈
X
×
X
×
X
is called
We denote the set of tripled coincidence points of mappings
F
and
g
by
C
(
F, g
). Note that if (
x, y, z
) ∈
C
(
F, g
), then (
y, z, x
) and (
z, x, y
) are also in
C
(
F, g
).
Deginition 2.2
. Let
F : X × X × X→ 2^{X}
be a multivalued mapping and
g
be a self-map on
X
. The hybrid pair {
F, g
} is called
w-compatible
if
g
(
F
(
x, y, z
)) ⊆
F
(
gx, gy, gz
) whenever (
x, y, z
) ∈
C
(
F, g
).
Deginition 2.3
. Let
F : X × X × X→ 2^{X}
be a multivalued mapping and
g
be a self-map on
X
. The mapping
g
is called
F-weakly commuting
at some point (x, y, z) ∈
X
^{3}
if
g
^{2}
x
∈
F
(
gx, gy, gz
), g
^{2}
y ∈
F
(
gy, gz, gx
) and
g
^{2}
z
∈
F
(
gz, gx, gy
).
Lemma 2.1
. Let (
X, d
)
be a metric space. Then, for each a
∈
X and B
∈
CB
(
X
),
there is b
_{0}
∈
B
such that D
(
a, B
) =
d
(a
, b
_{0}
), where
D
(
a, B
) = inf
_{b∈B}
d
(
a, b
).
Proof. Let
a
∈
X
and
B
∈
CB
(
X
). Since the function
d
is continuous. Thus, by the closedness of
B
, there exists
b
_{0}
∈
B
such that inf
_{b ∈B}
d
(
a, b
) =
d
(
a, b
_{0}
), that is,
D
(
a,B
) =
d
(
a, b
_{0}
).
It is clear that
φ(t
) <
t
for each
t
> 0: In fact, if
φ
(
t
_{0}
) ≥
t
_{0}
for some
t
_{0 }
> 0. then, since
φ
is non-decreasing,
φ
^{n}
(
t
_{0}
) ≥
t
_{0}
for all
n
∈
, which contradicts with lim
_{n→∞}
φ
^{n}
(
t
_{0}
) = 0. In addition, it is easy to see that
φ
(0) = 0. □
Theorem 2.1
. Let (
X
,
d
) be a metric space. Assume
F : X × X × X
→
CB
(
X
)
and g : X → X be two mappings satisfying
for all x, y, z, u, v, w ∈ X, where φ
∈ Φ.
Furthermore assume that F
(
X×X×X
) ⊆
g
(
X
)
and g
(
X
)
is a complete subset of X. Then F and g have a tripled coincidence point. Moreover, F and g have a common tripled fixed point, if one of the following conditions holds.
Proof. Let x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}
∈
X
be arbitrary. Then
F
(
x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}
),
F
(
y_{0}, z_{0}, x_{0}
) and
F
(
z_{0}, x_{0}, y_{0}
) are well defined. Choose
gx_{1}
∈
F
(
x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}
),
gy
_{1}
∈ F(
y_{0}, z_{0}, x_{0}
) and
gz
_{1}
∈
F
(
z_{0}, x_{0}, y_{0}
), because
F
(
X×X×X
) ⊆
g
(
X
). Since
F . X×X×X
→
CB
(
X
), therefore by Lemma 2.1, there exist
u
_{1}
∈
F
(
x
_{1}
,
y
_{1}
,
z
_{1}
),
u
_{2}
∈
F
(
y
_{1}
,
z
_{1}
,
x
_{1}
) and
u
_{3}
∈
F
(
z
_{1}
,
x
_{1}
,
y
_{1}
) such that
Since
F
(
X×X×X
) ⊆
g
(
X
), there exist
x
_{2}
,
y
_{2}
,
z
_{2}
∈
X
such that
u
_{1}
=
gx
^{2}
,
u
_{2}
=
gy
_{2}
and
u
_{3}
=
gz
_{2}
, Thus
Continuing this process, we obtain sequences {
x_{n}
}, {
y_{n}
} and {
z_{n}
} in
X
such that for all
n
∈
, we have
gx
_{n+1}
∈
F
(
x_{n}, y_{n}, z_{n}
),
gy
_{n+1}
∈
F
(
y_{n}, z_{n}, x_{n}
) and
gz
_{n+1}
∈
F
(
z_{n}, x_{n}, y_{n}
) such that
Thus,
Similarly
Combining (2,2), (2,3) and (2,4), we get
Thus
If we suppose that
then by (2, 5), (
i_{φ}
) and (
ii_{φ}
), we have
which is a contradiction. Thus, we must have
Hence by (2,5), we have for all
n
∈
,
Thus
where
δ = max {d (gx _{0}, gx _{1}), d (gy _{0}, gy _{1}), d (gz _{0}, gz _{1})} .
Without loss of generality, one can assume that max max {
d
(
gx
_{0}
,
gx
_{1}
),
d
(
gy
_{0}
,
gy
_{1}
),
d
(
gz
_{0}
,
gz
_{1}
)} ≠ In fact, if this is not true, then
gx
_{0}
=
gx
_{1}
∈
F
(
x
_{0}
,
y
_{0}
,
z
_{0}
),
gy
_{0}
=
gy
_{1}
∈
F
(
y
_{0}
,
z
_{0}
,
x
_{0}
) and
gz
_{0}
=
gz
_{1}
∈
F
(
z
_{0}
,
x
_{0}
,
y
_{0}
) that (
x
_{0}
,
y
_{0}
,
z
_{0}
) s a tripled coincidence point of
F
and
g
.
Thus, for
m, n
∈
with m >
n
, by triangle inequality and (2,6), we get
which implies, by (
ii_{φ}
), that {
gx_{n}
} is a Cauchy sequence in
g
(
X
). Similarly we obtain that {
gy_{n}
} and {
gz_{n}
} are Cauchy sequences in
g
(
X
). Since
g
(
X
) is complete, there exist
x, y, z
∈
X
such that
Now, since
gx
_{n+1}
∈
F
(
x_{n}, y_{n,} z_{n}
),
gy
_{n+1}
∈
F
(
y_{n}, z_{n,} x_{n}
) and
gz
_{n+1}
∈
F
(
z_{n}, x_{n,} y_{n}
), therefore by using condition (2,1), we get
where
Since lim
_{n→∞}
gx_{n}
=
gx
, lim
_{n→∞}
gy_{n}
=
gy
and lim
_{n→∞}
gz_{n}
=
gz
there exists
n
_{0}
∈
such that for all
n
>
n
_{0}
,
Combining this with (2,8), (2,9) and (2,10), we get for all
n
>
n
_{0}
,
Now, we claim that
If this is not true, then
Thus, by (2,11), (
i_{φ}
) and (
ii_{φ}
), we get for all
n
>
n
_{0}
,
Thus
Letting
n
→ ∞ in (2:13), by using (2,7), we obtain
which is a contradiction. So (2, 12) holds. Thus, it follows that
gx ∈ F (x, y, z ), gy ∈ F (y, z, x ) and gz ∈ F (z, x, y ),
that is, (
x, y, z
) is a tripled coincidence point of
F
and
g
. Hence
C
(
F, g
) is nonempty. Suppose now that (a) holds. Assume that for some (
x, y, z
) ∈
C
(
F, g
),
where
u, v, w
∈
X
. Since
g
is continuous at
u, v
and
w
. We have, by (2,14), that
u,v
and
w
are fixed points of
g
, that is,
As
F
and
g
are
w
-compatible, so for all
n
≥ 1,
Now, by using (2,1) and (2,16), we obtain
where
By (2,14) and (2,15), there exists
n
_{0}
∈
such that for all
n
>
n
_{0}
,
Combining this with (2,17), we get for all
n
>
n
_{0}
,
Now, we claim that
If this is not true, then
Thus, by (2,18), (
i_{φ}
) and (
ii_{φ}
), we get for all
n
>
n
_{0}
,
On taking limit as
n
→ ∞ in (2, 20), by using (2, 14) and (2, 15), we get
which is a contradiction. So (2, 19) holds. Thus, it follows that
Now, from (2, 15) and (2, 21), we have
that is, (
u, v, w
) is a common tripled fixed point of
F
and
g
.
Suppose now that (
b
) holds. Assume that for some (
x, y, z
) ∈
C
(
F, g
),
g
is F- weakly commuting, that is,
g
^{2}
x
∈
F
(
gx, gy, gz
),
g
^{2}
y
∈
F
(
gy, gz, gx
),
g
^{2}
z
∈
F
(
gz, gx, gy
), and
g
^{2}
x
=
gx
,
g
^{2}
y
=
gy
,
g
^{2}
z
=
gz
. Thus
gx
= g
^{2}
x ∈
F
(
gx, gy, gz
),
gy
= g
^{2}
y ∈
F
(
gy, gz, gx
) and
gz
= g
^{2}
z ∈
F
(
gz, gx, gy
), that is (
gx, gy, gz
) is a common tripled fixed point of
F
and
g
.
Suppose now that (
c
) holds. Assume that for some (
x, y, z
) ∈
C
(
F, g
) and for some
u, v, w
∈
X
, lim
_{n→∞}
g^{n}u
=
x
, lim
_{n→∞}
g^{n}v
=
y
and lim
_{n→∞}
g^{n}w
=
z
. Since
g
is continuous at
x, y
and
z
. We have that
x, y
and
z
are fixed point of
g
, that is,
gx
=
x
,
gy
=
y
and
gz
=
z
. Since (
x, y, z
) ∈ C(
F, g
), therefore, we obtain
x
=
gx
∈
F(x, y, z), y
=
gy
∈
F(y, z, x)
and
z
=
gz
∈
F(z, x, y)
,
Finally, suppose that (
d
) holds. Let
g
(
C
(
F, g
)) = {(
x, x, x
)}. Then {
x
} = {
gx
} = F(
x, x, x
): Hence (
x, x, x
) is tripled fixed point of
F
and
g
. □
Example 2.1.
Suppose that
X
= [0, 1], equipped with the metric
d
:
X ×X
→[0, +∞) defined by
d
(
x, y
) = max{
x, y
} and
d
(
x, x
) = 0 for all
x, y
∈
X
. Let
F
:
X×X×X
→
CB
(
X
) be defined as
and
g
:
X
→
X
be defined as
g(x)
=
x
^{2}
, for all
x
∈
X
.
Define
φ
: [0, ∞ ] → [0, ∞ ] by
Now, for all
x, y, z, u, v, w
∈
X
with
x, y, z, u, v, w
∈ [0, 1), we have
Case (a ) If x ^{2} + y ^{2} + z ^{2} = u ^{2} + v ^{2} + w ^{2}, then
Case (
b
) If
x
^{2}
+
y
^{2}
+
z
^{2}
≠
u
^{2}
+
v
^{2}
+
w
^{2}
with
x
^{2}
+
y
^{2}
+
z
^{2}
<
u
^{2}
+
v
^{2}
+
w
^{2}
, then
Similarly, we obtain the same result for
u
^{2}
+
v
^{2}
+
w
^{2}
<
x
^{2}
+
y
^{2}
+
z
^{2}
. Thus the contractive condition (2,1) is satisfied for all
x, y, z, u, v, w ∈ X
with
x, y, z, u, v, w
∈ [0, 1). Again for all
x, y, z, u, v, w
∈
X
with
x, y, z
, ∈ [0, 1) and
u, v, w
= 1, we have
Thus the contractive condition (2:1) is satisfied for all
x, y, z, u, v, w
∈
X
with
x, y z
∈ [0, 1) and
u, v, w
= 1, Similarly, we can see that the contractive condition (2,1) is satisfied for all
x, y, z, u, v, w
∈
X
with
x, y, z, u, v, w
= 1. Hence, the hybrid pair {F, g} satisfies the contractive condition (2,1), for all
x, y, z, u, v, w
∈
X
. In addition, all the other conditions of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied and z = (0, 0, 0) is a common tripled fixed point of hybrid pair {
F, g
} . The function
F : X×X×X
→
CB
(
X
) involved in this example is not continuous at the point (1, 1, 1) ∈
X×X×X
.
Remark 2.1
. We improve, extend and generalize the result of Ding, Li and Radenovic
[17]
in the following sense:
If we put
g
=
I
(
I
is the identity mapping) in Theorem 2.1, then we have the following result:
Corollary 2.2
. Let (
X, d
)
be a complete metric space, F : X × X× X
→
CB
(
X) be a mapping satisfying
for all x, y, z, u, v, w
∈
X
,
where φ
∈ Φ.
Then F has a tripled fixed point.
If we put
φ
(
t
) =
kt
where 0 <
k
< 1 in Theorem 2.1, then we have the following result:
Corollary 2.3
. Let (
X, d
)
be a metric space. Assume F : X × X× X
→
CB
(
X
) and
g
:
X → X be two mapping satisfying
for all x, y, z, u, v, w
∈
X where
0 <
k
< 1.
Furthermore assume that F
(
X ×X×X
) ⊆
g
(
X
) and
g
(
X
)
is a complete subset of X. Then F and g have a tripled coincidence point. Moreover, F and g have a common tripled fixed point, if one of the following conditions holds.
If we put
g
=
I
(
I
is the identity mapping) in Corollary 2.3, then we have the following result:
Corollary 2.4
.
Let
(
X, d
)
be a complete metric space, F : X × X × X → CB(X) be a mapping satisfying
for all x, y, z, u, v, w ∈ X . Then F has a tripled fixed point.

1. INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARIES

Let (
2. MAIN RESULTS

First we introduce the following:
- (1)a tripled fixed pointofFifx∈F(x, y, z),y∈F(y, z, x) and z ∈F(z, x, y).
- (2)a tripled coincidence pointof hybrid pair {F, g} ifg(x) ∈F(x, y, z),g(y) ∈F(y, z, x) andg(z) ∈F(z, x, y).
- (3)a common tripled fixed pointof hybrid pair {F, g} ifx=g(x) ∈F(x, y, z),y=g(y) ∈F(y, z, x) andz=g(z) ∈F(z, x, y).

- Let Φ denote the set of all functionsφ: [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) satisfying
- (iφ)φis non-decreasing,
- (iiφ) limn→ ∞φn(t) = 0 for allt> 0.

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

- (a)F and g are w-compatible.limn→∞gnx= u, limn→∞gny=v andlimn→∞gnz=w for some(x, y, z) ∈C(F, g)and for some u, v, w∈Xand g is continuous at u, v and w.
- (b)g is F-weakly commuting for some(x, y, z) ∈C(F, g)and gx, gy and gz are fixed points of g, that is, g2x = gx, g2y = gy and g2z = gz.
- (c)g is continuous at x, y and z.limn→∞gnu = x, limn→∞gnv = y andlimn→∞gnw = z for some(x, y, z) ∈C(F, g) and for someu, v, w∈X:
- (d)g(C(g, F))is singleton subset of C(g, F):

- d(gx1,u1) ≤H(F(x0,y0,z0),F(x1,y1,z1)),
- d(gy1,u2) ≤H(F(y0,z0,x0),F(y1,z1,x1)),
- d(gz1,u3) ≤H(F(z0,x0,y0),F(z1,x1,y1)).

- d(gx1,gx2) ≤H(F(x0,y0,z0),F(x1,y1,z1)),
- d(gy1,gy2) ≤H(F(y0,z0,x0),F(y1,z1,x1)),
- d(gz1,gz2) ≤H(F(z0,x0,y0),F(z1,x1,y1)).

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

- (i) We prove our result in the settings of multivalued mapping and for hybrid pair of mappings while Ding, Li and Radenovic[17]proved result for single valued mappings.
- (ii) We prove tripled coincidence and common tripled fixed point theorem while Ding, Li and Radenovic[17]proved coupled coincidence and common coupled fixed point theorems.
- (iii) To prove the result we consider non complete metric space and the space is also not partially ordered.
- (iv) The mappingF : X ×X ×X→CB(X) is discontinuous and not satisfying mixed g-monotone property.
- (v) The functionφ: [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) involved in our theorem and example is discontinuous.
- (vi) Our proof is simple and different from the other results in the existing literature.

- (a)F and g are w-compatible. limn→∞gnx=u, limn→∞gny=vandlimn→∞gnz=wfor some (x, y, z)∈C(F, g)and for some u, v, w ∈ X and g is con-tinuous at u, v and w.
- (b)g is F-weakly commuting for some (x, y, z) ∈ C(F, g) and gx, gy and gz are fixed points of g, that is, g2x = gx, g2y = gyandg2z = gz.
- (c)g is continuous at x, y and z. limn→∞gnu=x, limn→∞gnv=yandlimn→∞gnw=z for som (x, y, z ) ∈ C(F, g) and for some u, v, w ∈ X.
- (d)g(C(g, F)) is singleton subset of C(g, F).

Abbas M.
,
Aydi H.
,
Karapinar E.
Tripled fixed point theorems for multivalued nonlinear contraction mappings in partially ordered metric spaces
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Hindawi publication corporation
2011
12 -

Abbas M.
,
Ciric L.
,
Damjanovic B.
,
Khan M.A.
2012
Coupled coincidence point and common fixed point theorems for hybrid pair of mappings
Fixed Point Theory Appl
** DOI : 10.1186/1687-1812-2012-4**

Alsulami S.M.
,
Alotaibi A.
2012
Tripled coincidence points for monotone operators in partially ordered metric spaces
International Mathematical Forum
7
(37)
1811 -
1824

Aydi H.
,
Karapinar E.
,
Postolache M.
2012
Tripled coincidence point theorems for weak φ-contractions in partially ordered metric spaces
Fixed Point Theory Appl.
** DOI : 10.1186/1687-1812-2012-44**

Aydi H.
,
Karapinar E.
2012
Triple fixed points in ordered metric spaces
Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
4
(1)
197 -
207

Aydi H.
,
Karapinar E.
2012
New Meir-Keeler type tripled fixed point theorems on partially ordered metric spaces
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi publishing corporation
17 -

Aydi H.
,
Karapinar E.
,
Vetro C.
2012
Meir-Keeler type contractions for tripled fixed points
Acta Mathematica Scientia
6
2119 -
2130

Berinde V.
,
Borcut M.
2011
Tripled fixed point theorems for contractive type mappings in partially ordered metric spaces
Nonlinear Anal. Theory, Methods and Applications
74
(15)
4889 -
4897
** DOI : 10.1016/j.na.2011.03.032**

Berinde V.
,
Borcut M.
2012
Tripled coincidence theorems of contractive type mappings in partially ordered metric spaces
Applied Mathematics and Computation
218
(10)
5929 -
5936
** DOI : 10.1016/j.amc.2011.11.049**

Bhaskar T. G.
,
Lakshmikantham V.
2006
Fixed point theorems in partially ordered metric spaces and applications
Nonlinear Anal.
65
(6)
1379 -
1393
** DOI : 10.1016/j.na.2005.10.017**

Charoensawan P.
2012
Tripled fixed points theorems of φ-contractive mixed monotone operators on partially ordered metric spaces
Applied Mathematical Sciences
6
(105)
5229 -
5239

Deshpande B.
2007
Common fixed point for set and single valued functions without continuity and compatibility
Mathematica Moravica
11
27 -
38

Deshpande B.
,
Pathak R.
2012
Fixed point theorems for noncompatible discontinuous hybrid pairs of mappings on 2-metric spaces
Demonstratio Mathematica
XLV
(1)
143 -
154

Deshpande B.
,
Chouhan S.
2011
Common fixed point theorems for hybrid pairs of map-pings with some weaker conditions in 2-metric spaces
Fasciculi Mathematici
46
37 -
55

Deshpande B.
,
Chouhan S.
2011
Fixed points for two hybrid pairs of mappings satisfying some weaker conditions on non-complete metric spaces
SEA Bull. of Math.
35
851 -
858

Deshpande B.
,
Pathak R.
2012
Hybrid pairs of mappings with some weaker conditions in consideration of common fixed point on 2-metric spaces
Mathematica Moravica
16
(2)
1 -
12

Ding H.S.
,
Li L.
,
Radenovic S.
2012
Coupled coincidence point theorems for general-ized nonlinear contraction in partially ordered metric spaces
Fixed Point Theory Appl.
** DOI : 10.1186/1687-1812-2012-96**

Kubiaczyk I.
,
Deshpande B.
2006
Coincidence point for non-compatible multivalued maps satisfying an implicit relation
Demonstratio Mathematica
XXXIX
(4)
555 -
562

Kubiaczyk I.
,
Deshpande B.
2006
A common fixed point theorem for multivalued map-pings through T-weak commutativity
Mathematica Moravica
10
55 -
60

Kubiaczyk I.
,
Deshpande B.
2007
Common fixed point of multivalued mappings without continuity
Fasciculi Mathematici
37
(9)
19 -
26

Kubiaczyk I.
,
Deshpande B.
2008
Non-compatibility, discontinuity in consideration of common fixed point of set and single valued maps
SEA Bull Math.
32
467 -
474

Lakshmikantham V.
,
Ciric L.
2009
Coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in partially ordered metric spaces
Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Method and Applications
70
(12)
4341 -
4349
** DOI : 10.1016/j.na.2008.09.020**

Markin J.T.
1947
Continuous dependence of fixed point sets
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
38
545 -
547

Samet B.
,
Vetro C.
2010
Coupled fixed point, F-invariant set and fixed point of N-order
Ann. Funct. Anal.
1
46 -
56
** DOI : 10.15352/afa/1399900586**

Sharma S.
,
Deshpande B.
2006
Compatible multivalued mappings satisfying an implicit relation
SEA Bull Math.
30
535 -
540

Sharma S.
,
Deshpande B.
2007
Fixed point theorems for set and single valued maps without continuity and compatibility
Demonstratio Mathematica
XL
(3)
649 -
658

Sharma S.
,
Deshpande B.
,
Pathak R.
2008
Common fixed point theorems for hybrid pairs of mappings with some weaker conditions
Fasciculi Mathematici
39
71 -
84

Citing 'TRIPLED FIXED POINT THEOREM FOR HYBRID PAIR OF MAPPINGS UNDER GENERALIZED NONLINEAR CONTRACTION
'

@article{ SHGHCX_2014_v21n1_23}
,title={TRIPLED FIXED POINT THEOREM FOR HYBRID PAIR OF MAPPINGS UNDER GENERALIZED NONLINEAR CONTRACTION}
,volume={1}
, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmeb.2014.21.1.23}, DOI={10.7468/jksmeb.2014.21.1.23}
, number= {1}
, journal={The Pure and Applied Mathematics}
, publisher={Korean Society of Mathematical Education}
, author={DESHPANDE, BHAVANA
and
SHARMA, SUSHIL
and
HANDA, AMRISH}
, year={2014}
, month={Feb}