Advanced
On the Electric Fields Produced by Dipolar Coulomb Charges of an Individual Thundercloud in the Ionosphere
On the Electric Fields Produced by Dipolar Coulomb Charges of an Individual Thundercloud in the Ionosphere
Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences. 2015. Jun, 32(2): 141-144
Copyright © 2015, The Korean Space Science Society
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Received : April 04, 2015
  • Accepted : May 05, 2015
  • Published : June 15, 2015
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Share
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Vitaly P. Kim
Valery V. Hegai
hegai@izmiran.ru
Abstract
In this paper we study the transmission of the electrostatic field due to coulomb charges of an individual thundercloud into the midlatitude ionosphere, taking into account the total geomagnetic field integrated Pedersen conductivity of the ionosphere. It is shown that at ionospheric altitudes, a typical thundercloud produces an insignificant electrostatic field whereas a giant thundercloud can drive the horizontal electrostatic field with a magnitude of 270 μV/m for nighttime conditions.
Keywords
1. INTRODUCTION
Thunderclouds are tropospheric sources of intense electrostatic fields and electromagnetic radiation. It is known that lightning-associated electric fields penetrate into the ionosphere; they have been observed in the E and F regions as transient electric fields with a typical duration of 10-20 ms and a magnitude of 1-50 mV/m (e.g., Kelley et al. 1985 , 1990 ; Vlasov & Kelley 2009 ). According to the theoretical model of global atmospheric electricity developed by Hays & Roble (1979) , the African array of multiple thunderclouds is responsible for the steady state electrostatic field of ~300 μV/m at ionospheric altitudes for nighttime conditions. The calculations by Park & Dejnakarintra (1973) showed that an isolated giant thundercloud could produce electrostatic fields of ~700 μV/m in the nighttime midlatitude ionosphere. However, Park & Dejnakarintra (1973) neglected the ionospheric Pedersen conductivity above 150 km. The purpose of this study is to theoretically examine the mapping of electrostatic fields of coulomb charges of an individual thundercloud into the midlatitude ionosphere, taking into account the height-integrated Pedersen conductivities of both hemispheres.
2. BASIC EQUATIONS
In the simplest thundercloud model, the electrical structure of a thundercloud is represented by two volume Coulomb charges of the same absolute value Q but opposite signs, with a positive charge in the upper part of the thundercloud and a negative charge in the lower part of the thundercloud (e.g., Chalmers 1967 ). Typical thunderclouds extend from 2-3 km to 8-12 km in altitude, and so-called giant thunderclouds extend above an altitude of 20 km (e.g., Uman 1969 ; Weisberg 1976 ). The magnitude of Q is estimated to range from 5 to 25 coulombs for the typical thunderclouds, whereas in giant thunderclouds, Q may exceed 50 coulombs (e.g., Malan 1963 ; Kasemir 1965 ).
We use a cylindrical coordinate system ( r, φ, z ), in which the origin is placed at the earth’s surface and the z axis points upward and passes through the centers of thundercloud positive and negative volume charges. The mapping of thundercloud electrostatic field into the ionosphere is studied following a similar formalism to that used by Park & Dejnakarintra (1973) . In the steady state case, the electrostatic field distribution above the thundercloud is described by the following equations:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where J is the electric current density, σ is the electrical conductivity tensor, and E and Φ are the electrostatic field and potential, respectively. If we assume that the geomagnetic field B is vertical and the electrical conductivity tensor depends only on z , the following equation for the electrostatic potential Φ cna be obtained from (1), (2), and (3) :
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where σ p is the Pedersen conductivity and σ 0 is the specific conductivity. The atmospheric conductivity below 70 km is isotropic since drifts of charged particles are not affected by the geomagnetic field. Equation (4) can be solved analytically if the conductivities σ 0 and σ p are exponential functions of z. In the case of isotropic conductivity (setting σ 0 = σ p = b exp( z/h ), where b and h are constants), we obtain
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where J 0 is the zero-order Bessel function of the first kind, A 1 and B 1 are coefficients, and c 1 = -l/(2 h ) -[l/(4 h 2 )+ k 2 ] 1/2 , c 2 = -l/(2 h ) + [l/(4 h 2 )+ k 2 ] 1/2 . For the anisotropic region, where we let σ 0 = b 0 exp( z/h 0 ) and σ p = b p exp( z/h p ), the solution to Equation (4) is
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where Jν and Kν are the ν -order modified Bessel functions of the first and the second kind, respectively, and A 2 and B 2 are coefficients, ν = h p /( h p - h 0 ), f =2 νh 0 ( b p / b 0 ) 1/2 exp[- z (2 νh 0 )]. The coefficients A 1 , B 1 , A 2 , and B 2 are determined from the boundary conditions.
The electrostatic field components are given by
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Since the geomagnetic field B is assumed to be vertical, E r is perpendicular to B , while E z is parallel to B .
Above 90 km, the geomagnetic field lines are practically equipotential because the geomagnetic field aligned conductivity σ 0 is much higher than the transverse conductivity σ p . It allows us to consider the ionoshperic region above 90 km as a thin conducting layer with a geomagnetic field line integrated Pedersen conductivity Σ p , and the continuity equation of electric current at z =90 km takes the following form:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where ▽ denotes the gradient operator in the two dimensions transverse to B , and the factor 2 before Σ p accounts for a contribution of the Pedersen conductivity of the magnetically conjugate ionosphere. Equation (9) is explicitly expressed as
PPT Slide
Lager Image
We use the conductivity model as shown in Fig. 1 . Below 70 km, the conductivity is isotropic and varies exponentially with z as σ 01 = σ p1 = b 1 exp( z/h 1 ) from 0 to 40 km, and as σ 02 = σ p2 = b 2 [exp( z - z 1 )/ h 2 ] from 40 to 70 km (where z 1 = 40 km) with the values of b 1,2 and h 1,2 to approximately fit the atmospheric conductivity models by Cold & Pierce (1965) below 40 km and by Swider (1988) from 40 to 70 km. In the anisotropic region between 70 and 90 km, σ 0 , and σ p are exponentially extrapolated from 70 km to their equinoctial midday and midnight values at z =90 km. At z ≥ 90 km, the conductivities are found from
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Model altitude profiles of specific (σ0) and Pedersen (σp) conductivities. The numbers next to the curves indicate conductivity scale heights in kilometers within each altitude section.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where subscripts e and i denote electrons and the ith ion species, Ne and Ni are the electron and ion densities, e is the electron charge, me and mi are the electron and ion masses, νe and νi are the electron and ion momentum transfer collision frequencies, and ωe and ωi are the electron and ion gyrofrequencies, respectively. The frequencies νe and νi are from Schunk (1988) . The required input parameters are taken from the empirical ionospheric model IRI-2012 ( http://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/vitmo/iri2012_vitmo.html ) and the neutral atmosphere model NRLMSIS-00 ( http://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/modelweb/models/nrlmsise00.php ).
Our calculations show that during solar minimum, in Equinox, the magnitude of Ʃ p at middle latitudes is commonly in the ranges of 5.0-8.0 S and 0.1-0.2 S for day and night, respectively. However, the nighttime Ʃ p can be as low as 0.05 S. Under solar maximum conditions, Ʃ p is several times larger than in solar minimum.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
To compute the electrostatic potential above the thundercloud from (5) and (6), we impose the following boundary conditions:
  • 1. Φ=(Q/4πε0)[(r2+(zb-hp)2)-1/2-(r2+(zb-hn)2)-1/2] atz=zb
  • 2. Φ is continuous atz=40 km
  • 3.σ0∂Φ/∂z=2Ʃp(∂2Φ/∂r2+1/r∂Φ/∂r) atz=90 km
where ε 0 is the vacuum permittivity, z b is the altitude of the plane setting directly above the thundercloud top, and h p and h n are the altitudes of positive and negative charge centers of the thundercloud, respectively. The first boundary condition follows from the accepted electrical model of the thundercloud. We assume that the thundercloud does not affect the atmospheric conductivity at z z b .
Fig. 2 shows the computed electrostatic field component Er normalized to Q as a function of r in the nighttime and daytime midlatitude ionosphere at z ≥90 km for the typical thundercloud ( z b =10 km, h n =3 km, h p =8 km) and for the giant thundercloud ( z b =20 km, h n =5 km, h p =17 km). Solar minimum conditions are considered with Ʃ p =0.05 S at night and Ʃ p =5.0 S by day. All curves show similar behavior, attaining first a maximum and then revealing a gradual lowering. At night, the thundercloud electrostatic field is transmitted into the ionosphere much better than during the daytime. For a typical thundercloud, Er reaches its nighttime maximum value of ~2.6 μV/m (for Q=25 coulombs) at r ~35 km. In the case of the giant thundercloud, the nighttime maximum magnitude of Er is ~270 μV/m (for Q=50 coulombs) and r max ~40 km. The daytime maximum values of Er are one order of magnitude less than their nighttime values. Thus, the steady state electrostatic fields associated with the individual typical thunderclouds have very small magnitudes at ionospheric altitudes. In the case of a giant thundercloud, Er is two orders of magnitude larger. Note that Park & Dejnakarintra (1973) discovered that the maximum magnitude of the transverse electrostatic field produced in the nighttime midlatitude ionosphere by a giant thundercloud with Q=50 coulombs can be as large as ~700 μV/m, which is about 2.6 times more than in our estimate. This difference can mainly be attributed to the fact that Park & Dejnakarintra (1973) ignored the Pedersen conductivity above 150 km.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Calculated magnitude of the thundercloud electrostatic field strength Er normalized to Q, as a function of r, at ionospheric altitudes z≥90 km for the typical and giant thundercloud at night and by day.
4. CONCLUSION
Our computations show that the geomagnetic field line integrated Pedersen conductivity of the ionosphere plays an important role in troposphere-ionosphere electrostatic coupling. Even for nighttime conditions in solar minimum, when the values of Ʃ p are minimal, the electrostatic charges of the individual thundercloud can drive only small electrostatic fields at ionospheric altitudes.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Russian Academy of Sciences through Atmospheric Electrodynamics program (project No. 12).
References
Chalmers JA 1967 Atmospheric electricity Pergamon New York 309 - 342
Cole Jr. RK , Pierce ET 1965 Electrification in the Earth's atmosphere for altitudes between 0 and 100 kilometers J. Geophys. Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i012p02735 70 2735 - 2749
Hays PB , Roble RG 1979 A quasi-static model of global atmospheric electricity, 1. The lower atmosphere J. Geophys. Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JA084iA07p03291 84 3291 - 3305
Kasemir HW , Coroniti SC 1965 The thundercloud, in Problems of Atmospheric and Space Electricity Elsevier New York 215 - 235
Kelley MC , Siefring CL , Pfaff RF , Kintner PM , Larsen M 1985 Electrical measurements in the atmosphere and the ionosphere over an active thunderstorm: 1. Campaign overview and initial ionospheric results J. Geophys. Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA10p09815 90 9815 - 9823
Kelley MC , Ding JG , Holzworth RH 1990 Intense ionospheric electric and magnetic field pulses generated by lightning Geophys. Res. Lett. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/GL017i012p02221 17 2221 - 2224
Malan DJ 1963 Physics of Lightning The English Universities Press 23 - 37
Park CG , Dejnakarintra M 1973 Penetration of thundercloud electric fields into the ionosphere and magnetosphere: 1. Middle and subauroral latitudes J. Geophys. Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JA078i028p06623 78 6623 - 6633
Schunk RW 1988 A mathematical model of the middle and high latitude ionosphere Pure Appl. Geophys. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00879813 127 255 - 303
Swider W 1988 Ionic mobility, mean mass, and conductivity in the middle atmosphere from near ground level to 70 km Radio Sci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/RS023i003p00389 23 389 - 399
Uman MA 1969 Lightning McGraw-Hill New York 10 - 35
Vlasov MN , Kelley MC 2009 Electron heating and airglow emission due to lightning effects on the ionosphere J. Geophys. Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013922 114 A00E06 -
Weisberg JS 1976 Meteorology: The Earth and Its Weather Houghton Mifflin Boston 107 - 122