Orbital Elements Evolution Due to a Perturbing Body in an Inclined Elliptical Orbit

Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences.
2014.
Sep,
31(3):
199-204

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

- Received : July 01, 2014
- Accepted : September 01, 2014
- Published : September 15, 2014

Download

PDF

e-PUB

PubReader

PPT

Export by style

Article

Metrics

Cited by

TagCloud

This paper intends to highlight the effect of the third-body in an inclined orbit on a spacecraft orbiting the primary mass. To achieve this goal, a new origin of coordinate is introduced in the primary and the X-axis toward the node of the spacecraft. The disturbing function is expanded up to the second order using Legendre polynomials. A double-averaged analytical model is exploited to produce the evolutions of mean orbital elements as smooth curves.
m
_{0}
, fixed at the origin of the reference. The doubleaverage is taken over the mean motion of the spacecraft and that of the disturbing body after expansion of the disturbing function in Legendre polynomials.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we formulate the disturbing function (using the traditional expansion in Legendre polynomials) due to a third body truncated up to the second-order term. In Section 3, The Lagrange’s planetary equations for the variations of spacecraft’s orbital elements are shown. In Section 4, we simulate the study assuming a spacecraft in an elliptical inclined orbit around the Moon with its motion perturbed by the Earth.
a
, the eccentricity,
e
, the inclination,
i
, the right ascension of ascending node,
Ω
, the argument of periapsis,
w
,
f
is the true anomaly and the mean anomaly,
M
. Also, the same notations with prime will be used for the third body. It is assumed that the main body with mass
m
_{0}
is fixed in the center of the reference system. The perturbing body, with mass
m
' is in an elliptic inclined orbit with mean motion
n
', given by the expression
n
'
^{2}
a
'
^{3}
=g(
m
_{0}
+
m
'), where r and
r
' are the radius vectors of the spacecraft and
m
' (assuming
r
'»
r
_{0}
), and
ψ
is the angle between these radius vectors. The disturbing function (using the traditional expansion in Legendre polynomials;
P
_{n}
) due to the third body is given by
where
g
is the gravitational constant and
ψ
is the angle between the line that connects the massive central body and the perturbed body (the spacecraft) and the line that connects the massive central body and the perturbing body (the third body).
For the models used in this research, it is necessary to calculate the parts of the disturbing function due to
R
_{2}
,
The magnitude of the effect of the disturbing body on the orbit of a spacecraft depends on the position of the disturbing body in its orbit. The next step is to express cos
ψ
in terms of the orbital elements. It is clear from
Fig. 1
that the base vectors along
and
may be defined as
Relation between the angle Ψ and the orbital elements of any two objects with mass m and m '.
where
r
and
r
' are the moduli of vectors
and
from which
where
u
=
f
+
ω
is usually known as the argument of latitude and Δ
Ω
=
Ω
'-
Ω
is the difference of the nodal longitudes. In the subsequent developments the adopted reference frame is an equatorial system with the positive
X-axis
towards the node of the orbit of m,
Z-axis
towards the north pole of the equator of the primary, and the
Y-axis
completing a right handed system.
The last relation can be rewritten in a compact form as below:
where the non-vanishing coefficients are
The next step is to average expression (2), using Eq. (3), over the short period of the spacecraft as well as with respect to the distant perturbing body. The standard definition for the average can be written as:
This yields
Rewriting above equation gives
where the non-vanishing coefficients are
R
_{2}
» is established as, e.g. Brouwer & Clemence (1961):
where
a
_{0}
=0.01 (3,844km),
e
_{0}
=0.01,
i
_{0}
=15°,60° and
ω
_{0}
=Ω
_{0}
=0°were used to show the behavior of the evolutions of the spacecraft orbital elements with time. The perturbing body was in elliptical (
e
'=0.1) inclined ( 10°≤
i'
≤80°). From the graphs shown in
Fig. 2
and
Fig. 3
, it is revealed that the evolutions of argument of pericenter (
ω
) keeps increasing for a fixed third body's inclination (
i
') but as (
i
') goes to higher angle, the rate of increase in
ω
gets lower. On another hand, the evolutions of right ascension of the ascending node (Ω) and inclination (
i
) keep decreasing with fixed
i
' up to the certain angle but as
i
' changes upward, they increase while the rate of increase in
Ω
and i decreases. The evolution eccentricity (
e
) shows periodical behavior with the time even if the amplitude depends strongly on the (
i
').
Evolutions of orbital elements for spacecraft’s over 1,000 days with initial conditions a _{0}=0.01 (3,844km), e _{0}=0.01, i _{0}=15°, and ω _{0}=Ω_{0}=0°. It is supposed that the initial conditions of the third body are a ’= (384,400km), e ’=0.1, and ω ’=Ω’=0°, and 10° ≤ i ’ ≤ 80°, inc= i ’. (a) Eccentricity, (b) Inclination (rad), (c) Argument of periapsis (rad), (d) Right ascension of ascending node (rad)
Evolutions of orbital elements for spacecraft’s over 1,000 days with initial conditions a _{0}=0.01 (3,844km), e _{0}=0.01, i _{0}=80°, and ω _{0}=Ω_{0}=0°. It is supposed that the initial conditions of the third body are a’= (384,400km), e’=0.1, and ω ’=Ω’=0°, and 10° ≤ i ’ ≤ 80°, inc= i ’. (a) Eccentricity, (b) Inclination (rad), (c) Argument of periapsis (rad), (d) Right ascension of ascending node (rad)

1. INTRODUCTION

The effect of the third-body perturbation is one of the most important mechanisms in delivering the major Earth orbiting objects into the regions where the atmosphere starts to decay. Several papers have studied the third-body perturbation of the Sun and the Moon on a satellite orbiting the Earth and major related works are listed as follows. In a series of papers (Kozai 1959, 1962, 1965), Kozai developed the secular and long period terms of the disturbing function due to lunisolar perturbations in terms of the orbital elements of a satellite, the Sun and the Moon, and applied those secular perturbations to asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity assuming that Jupiter is the perturbing body. Blitzer (1959) obtained the estimates of secular terms due to lunisolar disturbances. In the sequence, Cook (1962) used the Lagrange’s planetary equations to obtain expressions for the variations of elements during the revolution of a satellite and for the rates of variation of the elements. Giacaglia (1974) obtained the disturbing function for the disturbance of the Moon using the ecliptic elements for the Moon and the equatorial elements for a satellite. Hough (1981) studied the effects of lunisolar disturbances in orbits close to critical inclinations from the point of view of the geopotential of the Earth and concluded that the effects are significant in high altitudes. Broucke (2003) and Prado & Costa (1998), truncated the disturbing function of the third body after the second and the fourth order expansion in Legendre polynomials, respectively. After that, Costa (1998) expanded the order of this model to the eighth order. Solόrzano & Prado (2007) developed a semi-analytical study of the perturbation caused on a spacecraft by a third body with a single averaged model to eliminate the terms due to the short-lived periodic motion of the spacecraft. Prado (2003) studied the evolution of retrograde orbits around the Earth. The existence of circular, equatorial and frozen orbits was also considered. Costa & Prado (2002) discussed the critical angle of a third-body perturbation that is a value for the inclination such that any near-circular orbit with inclination below this value remains near- circular. Domingos et al. (2008) showed an analytical expansion to study the third-body perturbation for a case where the perturbing body is in an elliptical orbit, based on the expansion of the perturbing function in polynomials of Legendre.
In this paper, the study done by Broucke (2003), Prado (2003) and Domingos et al. (2008) is expanded, including the eccentricity and inclination of the perturbing body. A three-dimensional model is used to study the effects of a third-body gravitational potential on the spacecraft that orbits near a celestial body including the eccentricity and the inclination of the third-body in the formulation. There is no assumption in our study on the perturbed and perturbing orbits except the usual assumption that there are only three bodies involved in the system: the first body with mass,
2. ELLIPTICAL AND INCLINED DISTURBING POTENTIAL

About notations through this paper, we use the wellknown Keplerian elements: the semi-major axis,
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

3. LAGRANGE’S PERTURBATION EQUATIONS

Using Lagrange planetary equations, the variation of the orbital elements due to the averaging disturbing potential «
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

4. NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS

In this section, we suppose a spacecraft in an elliptical inclined orbit around the Moon and its motion perturbed by the Earth for a duration time of 1,000 days. The initial conditions found in Prado (2003) and Domingos et al. (2008) ; a lunar satellite with
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Beginning this study, the basic question is; what is the effect of inclined third body on the spacecraft orbital elements? For the answer, the effects of wide range of the inclinations of the third body (10°-80°) are presented. Using the initial conditions found in Prado (2003) and Domingos et al. (2008), the results of changing the third body’s inclinations over (10°-80°) on the model indicated that the effect of the third body’s inclinations cannot be neglected to be consistent with many previous studies.
In this paper, we have used three-dimensional model to analyze the perturbations of the third body potential on a spacecraft that orbits close to a heavenly body including the eccentricity and the inclination of the third-body of the perturbing body within the formulation.
All curves turned out to be smooth through the well-known double-average model based on the mean motion of the spacecraft and the perturbing body which plays an important role in the analysis of spacecrafts long term dynamics enabling the short-lived periodic terms to be eliminated.
Acknowledgements

The author gratefully thanks JASS editorial board for manuscript improvement.

Blitzer L
1959
Lunar-Solar Perturbations of an Earth Satellite
American Journal of Physics
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1934947
27
634 -
645
** DOI : 10.1119/1.1934947**

Broucke RA
2003
Long-term third-body effects via double averaging
Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/2.5041
26
27 -
32
** DOI : 10.2514/2.5041**

Brouwer D
,
Clemence GM
1961
Methods of Celestial Mechanics
Academic press INC
New York

Cook GE
1962
Luni-solar perturbations of the orbit of an Earth satellite
Geophysical Juurnal
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1962.tb00351.x
6
271 -
291
** DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1962.tb00351.x**

Costa IV
1998
“Study of the Third-Body Perturbation in a Earth’s Artificial Satellite (“Estudio da Perturbaçéo de Terceiro Corpo em Um Satélite Artificial da Terra”, in Portuguese), Master Dissertation
National Institute for Space Research
Séo José dos Campos, SP, Brazil

Costa IV
,
Prado AFBA
2000
Orbital Evolution of a Satellite Perturbed by a Third Body
Advances in Space Dynamics
176 -
194

Domingos RC
,
Moraes RV
,
Prado AFBA
2008
Third-body perturbation in the case of elliptic orbits for the disturbing body
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/763654
** DOI : 10.1155/2008/763654**

Giacaglia GEO
1974
Lunar Perturbations on Artificial Satellites of the Earth
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Ast ronomy
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01260515
9
239 -
267
** DOI : 10.1007/BF01260515**

Hough ME
1981
Orbits near critical inclination including lunisolar perturbations
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01230514
25
111 -
136
** DOI : 10.1007/BF01230514**

Kozai Y
1965
Effects of the Tidal Deformation on the Motion of Satellites
PASJ
17
395 -
402

Kozai Y
1959
On the Effects of the Sun and the Moon upon the Motion of a Close Earth Satellite
SAOSR
22
7 -
10

Kozai Y
1962
Secular Perturbations of Asteroids with High Inclination and Eccentricity
AJ
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/108790
67
591 -
598
** DOI : 10.1086/108790**

Prado AFBA
,
Costa IV
1998
Third-Body Perturbation in Spacecraft Trajectory
1998 49th International Astronautical Congress
Melbourne, AU

Prado AFBA
2003
Third-body perturbation in orbits around natural satellites
Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/2.5042
26
33 -
40
** DOI : 10.2514/2.5042**

Solórzano CRH
,
Prado AFBA
2007
Third-body perturbation using single averaged model: Application to lunisolar perturbations
Nonlinear Dynamics and Systems Theory
7
409 -
417

Citing 'Orbital Elements Evolution Due to a Perturbing Body in an Inclined Elliptical Orbit
'

@article{ OJOOBS_2014_v31n3_199}
,title={Orbital Elements Evolution Due to a Perturbing Body in an Inclined Elliptical Orbit}
,volume={3}
, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2014.31.3.199}, DOI={10.5140/JASS.2014.31.3.199}
, number= {3}
, journal={Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences}
, publisher={The Korean Space Science Society}
, author={Rahoma, W. A.}
, year={2014}
, month={Sep}