Advanced
Preliminary Test of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Controller for Spacecraft Attitude Control
Preliminary Test of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Controller for Spacecraft Attitude Control
Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences. 2012. Dec, 29(4): 389-395
Copyright ©2012, The Korean Space Science Society
This is an open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which premits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Received : October 10, 2012
  • Accepted : November 11, 2012
  • Published : December 15, 2012
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Share
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Sung-Woo Kim
Sang-Young Park
spark624@yonsei.ac.kr
Chan-Deok Park
Abstract
The problem of spacecraft attitude control is solved using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). An ANFIS produces a control signal for one of the three axes of a spacecraft’s body frame, so in total three ANFISs are constructed for 3-axis attitude control. The fuzzy inference system of the ANFIS is initialized using a subtractive clustering method. The ANFIS is trained by a hybrid learning algorithm using the data obtained from attitude control simulations using state-dependent Riccati equation controller. The training data set for each axis is composed of state errors for 3 axes (roll, pitch, and yaw) and a control signal for one of the 3 axes. The stability region of the ANFIS controller is estimated numerically based on Lyapunov stability theory using a numerical method to calculate Jacobian matrix. To measure the performance of the ANFIS controller, root mean square error and correlation factor are used as performance indicators. The performance is tested on two ANFIS controllers trained in different conditions. The test results show that the performance indicators are proper in the sense that the ANFIS controller with the larger stability region provides better performance according to the performance indicators.
Keywords
1. INTRODUCTION
Spacecraft attitude control is an important aspect of performing many space missions. There has been a lot of interest in designing an accurate and stable controller for attitude control. Recently, state-dependent Riccati equation (SDRE) controllers have been introduced and applied to spacecraft attitude control. An SDRE controller produces a robust and suboptimal control signal, and is relatively easy to implement in nonlinear systems (Chang et al. 2009, 2010, Abdelrahman et al. 2011, Abdelrahman & Park 2011, Park et al. 2011). But despite its benefits, it has some drawbacks: 1) there is no systematic way to determine optimal value for weighting matrices which affects the optimality of the controller. 2) It can be difficult to derive state dependent coefficient (SDC) matrix if the plant system is highly nonlinear and complex. 3) From the perspective of real time application, it presents a high computational burden because it is necessary to update the solution of the Riccati equation every sampling time.
To provide a solution to the third of the problems mentioned above, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) can be used, as it can model any system once it is given the input-output data pairs of the original system. ANFIS was first introduced by Jang (1993), and has been used by many researchers in control and nonlinear system identification (Jang & Sun 1995, Buyukbingol et al. 2007, Ghomsheh et al. 2007, Hua & Hengxin 2008, Sivarao et al. 2009, Tahmasebi & Hezarkhani 2010, Baseri & Alinejad 2011, Pratama et al. 2011). ANFIS is a combination of a neural network and a fuzzy inference system, and it is based on the TS fuzzy model (Takagi & Sugeno 1985). The fuzzy inference system uses a linguistic variable so that it can incorporate the experiences of human experts, but there used to be hardly any method of constructing a fuzzy inference system in a systematic way. Neural networks have the capacity of learning from data to update adaptive parameters, but do not have any kind of specific structure for system identification. In this respect, the neural networks and fuzzy inference system can help each other by compensating for each other’s weak points. By taking the advantages from both of them, ANFIS comes out. Therefore ANFIS has a structural way of identifying a specific system using the power of learning of neural networks.
Abdelrahman et al. (2010) proposed a method of applying ANFIS to spacecraft attitude control to reduce the computational load on the SDRE controller. In their approach, ANFIS is trained using the training data obtained from attitude control simulations using an SDRE controller so that ANFIS can mimic the control signal of the SDRE controller with respect to the state error. The same approach is adopted in this paper with some modifications: 1) to model the SDRE control system more accurately, coupled training data is used, while Abdelrahman et al. (2010) used decoupled training data. 2) To deal with the multiple input variables, the subtractive clustering (SC) method proposed by Chiu (1994) is used for initialization of the fuzzy inference system of ANFIS. The procedure for training the ANFIS is offered by Jang et al. (1997) as a hybrid learning rule.
Another viewpoint of this paper is in the stability region estimation and performance indicator of ANFIS controller. To estimate the stability region of ANFIS using Lyapunov stability theory, it is necessary to calculate the Jacobian matrix of the control system. The Jacobian of the ANFIS control system is hard to obtain analytically, so a numerical SDC formulation proposed by Vaddi et al. (2009) is used to calculate the Jacobian matrix numerically. Root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation factor (CF) are calculated as performance indicators for the system identification capability of the ANFIS controller.
2. ANFIS CONTROLLER FORMULATION
- 2.1 ANFIS Structure
ANFIS consists of 5 layers, and each layer has several adaptive nodes. The nodes are adaptive in that they contain adaptive parameters. ANFIS is based on the Takagi-Sugeno (TS) fuzzy model,
Lager Image
and is illustrated in Fig. 1 for the two rule case (Jang et al. 1997). The functions of the nodes in each layer are as follows:
Lager Image
Architecture of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (Jang et al. 1997).
Layer 1: the node output in this layer is membership function for input variables.
  • Q1,i=μAi(x),i=1,2
  • Q1,i=μBi-2(y),i=3,4
Layer 2: the node output in this layer is product of the membership functions for each variable, which is called firing strength .
Q2,i = ωi = μAi ( x μBi ( y ), i =1,2
In this paper, Gaussian membership functions are used.
Lager Image
where ci , σi are called premise parameters.
Layer 3: the node output in this layer is a normalized firing strength.
Lager Image
Layer 4: the node output in this layer is
Lager Image
where pi , qi , ri are called consequent parameters . The function fi is a linear combination of input variables, which is why it is called first order TS model.
Layer 5: the node output in this layer is the summation of all rules’ output.
Lager Image
In Layers 1 and 2, all possible membership function values are obtained for each input, and the firing strength is ready for each rule as a product of membership functions. In Layers 3 and 4, each rule’s output is ready for summation in Layer 5, which produces the output of ANFIS.
- 2.2 ANFIS Training
The purpose of training ANFIS is to model the SDRE control system so that ANFIS can produce a control signal that is as close as possible to the control signal obtained by SDRE controller with the same state error. The coupled training data used in this paper contains 6 error states and 1 corresponding control signal in a pair as described below,
Lager Image
where ( eroll , epitch , eyaw ) are Euler angle errors, ( eωx , eωy , eωz ) are angular velocity errors, and ( ux , uy , uz ) are control signals for each axis. The coupled training data represents the original SDRE control system more accurately than decoupled training data, and it is obtained from 100 SDRE attitude control simulations with 100 initial conditions uniformly distributed in the range of [-180, 180] deg and [-1, 1] deg/ s for Euler angles and angular velocities, respectively.
For training data containing many input variables, it is not adequate to use a grid partitioning method because the number of rules in ANFIS increases exponentially with the number of inputs. For example, 2 membership functions for 6 inputs means 2 6 rules. The number of rules, however, is not dependent on the number of membership functions or input variables in SC, but is dependent on the cluster size. Therefore, as an initialization of ANFIS, SC (Chiu 1994) is used.
After the fuzzy inference system is initialized by SC, the ANFIS training process starts. The process is divided into two sequences according to the hybrid learning method proposed by Jang et al. (1997). One is to update the premise parameter and the other is to update consequent parameters. Least squares estimator is used for consequent parameter updating, and back propagation is used for premise parameter updating.
3. SDRE CONTROLLER FORMULATION
To apply SDRE controller to the attitude control problem, the spacecraft dynamics are represented by angular velocity and the vector part of quaternion as follows (Chang et al. 2008),
Lager Image
where ωbr and ωri are an angular velocity vector of spacecraft with respect to orbital reference frame and an angular velocity vector of orbital reference frame with respect to inertial frame, respectively, qbr is the vector part of a quaternion between spacecraft body frame and orbital reference frame, q4br is 4th element of the quaternion, I is the moment of inertia of the spacecraft, C ( qbr ) represents coordinate transformation matrix from orbital reference frame to spacecraft body frame, [●×] is a cross product matrix, and u is control signal. Note that all variables in Eq. (2) are expressed in spacecraft body frame. Eq. (2) can be rewritten using SDC form, which is essential in SDRE controller design,
Lager Image
where
Lager Image
and C2 is the second column of the coordinate transformation matrix, E3×3 is an identity matrix.
Using Eq. (3), the SDRE can be formulated as follows
Lager Image
Once Q ( x ) and R ( x ) are given, Eq. (4) can be solved for P ( x ), and the SDRE control law is constructed as follows
Lager Image
Eq. (5) is the control signal to minimize a performance index represented by
Lager Image
4. LYAPUNOV STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE INDICATOR OF ANFIS
- 4.1 Stability Region Estimation
Proposed by Bracci et al. (2006), a numerical method to estimate the region of attraction of the SDRE-controlled systems has been successfully applied to the attitude control problem by Chang et al. (2008). The method is as follows:
To apply this method, the dynamics in Eq. (3) are linearized around the equilibrium point.
Lager Image
where x0 is the equilibrium point. If A0 is Hurwitz, the Lyapunov function V(x) can be obtained by solving the Lyapunov equation,
Lager Image
and time derivative of the Lyapunov function can be obtained as follows.
Lager Image
In Eq. (6), Q is chosen by the user as a positive definite matrix. Then, the maximum closed region such that all the states in that region satisfy the conditions, V(x) ≥0 and
Lager Image
is the stability region. This method is applied to estimate the stability region of the SDRE controller and the ANFIS controller proposed in this paper.
- 4.2 Performance Indicators of ANFIS
Aldrian & Djamil (2008) applied ANFIS to predict daily rainfall and presented RMSE and CF as performance indicators to check the effectiveness of the given ANFIS in modeling the original system. The two performance indicators are formulated as follows.
Lager Image
where n is the number of test data pairs, g represents the output of the original system, G represents the output of ANFIS, and E (●) is a mean value operator. The test data contains system input variables, and the outputs of the original system and the ANFIS are obtained given the input variables. The RMSE indicates how closely the output of ANFIS can follow that of the original system over the predetermined test data, and CF indicates the degree of correlation between outputs from original system and ANFIS. The performance of the ANFIS controller proposed in this paper is evaluated using these indicators.
5. TEST AND SIMULATIONS
- 5.1 Simulation Environment
Simulations have been carried out to test the performance of ANFIS controller when it is applied to the attitude control problem. The spacecraft is assumed to be on the low Earth orbit 600 km above the Earth’s surface, and the orbit is assumed to be circular. The spacecraft moment of inertia is assumed to be diag [10 10 10] kgm2 . The simulation time span is 100 seconds and sampling interval is 1 second. The initial condition is set to be
Lager Image
for Euler angles and angular velocity, respectively.
- 5.2 Test and Simulation Results
Stability region of SDRE and ANFIS control system has been estimated using the Lyapunov-theory-based method proposed by Bracci et al. (2006) (see Section 4). This method requires the calculation of the Jacobian matrix of the control
Lager Image
Attitude and angular velocity history (SDRE vs. well-trained ANFIS). SDRE: state-dependent Riccati equation, ANFIS: adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system.
Lager Image
Attitude and angular velocity history (SDRE vs. ill-trained ANFIS). SDRE: state-dependent Riccati equation, ANFIS: adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system.
system. However, it is very difficult to get the Jacobian matrix of ANFIS control system using analytical calculation. To solve this problem, the numerical SDC formulation proposed by Vaddi et al. (2009) has been applied to calculate the Jacobian matrix. The angular velocity vector is fixed to [0.5730 0.5730 0.5730] deg/ s within the range of [-1, 1] deg/ s which is used as a range of initial angular velocities in 100 SDRE attitude control simulations for generating training data (see Section 2), and the stability region is estimated over the 1,000 quaternion vector parts. These quaternion vector parts are obtained from Euler angles using Euler angle to quaternion transformation, and the Euler angle is extracted from uniform distribution in the range of [-180, 180] deg for each axis. The range of the stability region of SDRE controller covers 1,000 test states, but for ANFIS controller trained by SDRE controller, it differs among
Lager Image
Control history (SDRE vs. well-trained ANFIS). SDRE: state-dependent Riccati equation, ANFIS: adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system.
Lager Image
Control history (SDRE vs. ill-trained ANFIS). SDRE: state-dependent Riccati equation, ANFIS: adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system.
different ANFISs which are trained in different conditions; that is, cluster size in SC (i.e. number of rules) and training data configuration. How well the ANFIS is trained is measured in this paper by the size of the stability region. A well-trained ANFIS controller is an ANFIS controller whose stability region contains 199 states of the total of 1,000 test states, while the ill-trained ANFIS controller is an ANFIS controller whose stability region contains 91 states.
The performance of the well-trained ANFIS controller is compared to that of the SDRE controller and that of the ill-trained ANFIS controller. Figs. 2 and 3 show state error history of well-trained and ill-trained ANFIS control systems, respectively, using the initial conditions mentioned above. Figs. 4 and 5 show the corresponding control signal history for the two ANFIS control systems. We can see that the well-trained ANFIS control system trajectories
Performance indicators.RMSE: root mean square error, CF: correlation factor.
Lager Image
Performance indicators. RMSE: root mean square error, CF: correlation factor.
follow the SDRE control system trajectories more closely. The performance indicators (RMSE and CF) have been calculated using the 1,000 test data sets obtained randomly from uniform distribution in the range of [-180, 180] deg for Euler angles and [-1, 1] deg/ s for angular velocity for each axis. The test results are shown in Table 1 . The RMSE of a well-trained ANFIS is less than one-third that of the ill-trained ANFIS, which means the well-trained ANFIS is closer to the SDRE controller. In addition, the CF of the well-trained ANFIS is greater than that of the ill-trained ANFIS, which means the well-trained ANFIS is correlated more strongly with the SDRE controller.
6. CONCLUSIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
ANFIS controller is constructed and applied to the attitude control problem. The ANFIS controller is trained using data obtained by attitude control simulations using an SDRE controller. The fuzzy inference system of ANFIS is initialized by SC with 6 input variables. RMSE and CF are used to test the performance of the ANFIS controller, and stability region of the controller is estimated using numerical SDC formulation based on Lyapunov stability theory. The ANFIS performance is shown to be dependent on the number of rules of ANFIS and the training data configuration. Through a comparison between well-trained and ill-trained ANFIS, the performance indicators are shown to be adequate indicators. However, the range of the stable region of the ANFIS control system does not cover all test state regions with fixed angular velocity, while the SDRE control system appears to be globally asymptotically stable. Moreover, the numerical error possibly caused by numerical SDC formulation has not been considered. Nevertheless, the results shown in this paper allow us to confirm the usability of ANFIS controller. Future research should pursue the design of a globally stable ANFIS controller.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Global Surveillance Research Center (GSRC) program funded by the Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) and Agency for Defense Development (ADD).
References
Abdelrahman M , Kim SW , Park SY Spacecraft attitude control via a combined state-dependent Riccati equation and adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach in the 20th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting San Diego, CA 14-17 Feb 2010
Abdelrahman M , Chang I , Park SY 2011 Magnetic torque attitude control of a satellite using the state-dependent Riccati equation technique IJNLM 46 758 - 771
Abdelrahman M , Park SY 2011 Integrated attitude determination and control system via magnetic measurements and actuation AcAau 69 168 - 185
Aldrian E , Djamil YS 2008 Application of multivariate ANFIS for daily rainfall prediction: influences of training data size Makara Seri Sains 12 7 - 14
Baseri H , Alinejad G 2011 ANFIS modeling of the surface roughness in grinding process World Acad Sci Eng Technol 49 499 - 503
Bracci A , Innocenti M , Pollini L 2006 Estimation of the region of attraction for state-dependent Riccati equation controllers JGCD 29 1427 - 1430
Buyukbingol E , Sisman A , Akyildiz M , Alparslan FN , Adejare A 2007 Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS): a new approach to predictive modeling in QSAR applications: a study of neuro-fuzzy modeling of PCP-based NMDA receptor antagonists Bioorg Med Chem 15 4265 - 4282
Chang I , Park SY , Choi KH The relaxed state-dependent Riccati equation technique: concept and applications in F. Landis Markley Astronautics Symposium Cambridge, MD 29 Jun-2 Jul 2008
Chang I , Park SY , Choi KH 2009 Decentralized coordinated attitude control for satellite formation flying via the state-dependent Riccati equation technique IJNLM 44 891 - 904
Chang I , Park SY , Choi KH 2010 Nonlinear attitude control of a tether-connected multi-satellite in three-dimensional space ITAES 46 1950 - 1968
Chiu SL 1994 Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2 267 - 278
Ghomsheh VS , Shoorehdeli MA , Teshnehlab M Training ANFIS structure with modified PSO algorithm Proceedings of the 15th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation Athens, Greece 27-29 Jun 2007 1 - 6
Hua X , Hengxin X 2008 Improved ANFIS to forecast atmospheric pollution Manag Sci Eng 2 54 - 61
Jang JSR 1993 ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system ITSMC 23 665 - 685
Jang JSR , Sun CT 1995 Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control Proc IEEE 83 378 - 406
Jang JSR , Sun CT , Mizutani E 1997 Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing: a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River 335 - 368
Park H , Park SY , Choi KH 2011 Satellite formation reconfiguration and station keeping using state-dependent Riccati equation technique Aero Sci Technol 15 440 - 452
Pratama M , Rajab S , Joo EM 2011 Extended approach of ANFIS in cascade control Int J Comput Electr Eng 3 572 - 576
Sivarao I , Brevern P , El-Tayeb NSM , Vengkatesh VC 2009 GUI based ANFIS modeling: back propagation optimization method for CO2 laser machining Int J Intell Infor Technol Appl 2 191 - 198
Tahmasebi P , Hezarkhani A 2010 Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for grade estimation; case study, Sarcheshmeh porphyry copper deposit, Kerman, Iran Aust J Basic Appl Sci 4 408 - 420
Takagi T , Sugeno M 1985 Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control ITSMC SMC-15 116 - 132
Vaddi SS , Menon PK , Ohlmeyer EJ 2009 Numerical state-dependent Riccati equation approach for missle integrated guidance control JGCD 32 699 - 703