The BV Photometry of the RR Lyrae Star, BH Ursae Majoris: Light Curves and Period Study

Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences.
2011.
Jun,
28(2):
109-116

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/)which permits unrestrictednon-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,provided the original work is properly cited.

- Received : May 11, 2011
- Accepted : May 20, 2011
- Published : June 15, 2011

Download

PDF

e-PUB

PubReader

PPT

Export by style

Article

Metrics

Cited by

TagCloud

The first presented
BV
light curves of BH UMa confirmed Krajci’s (2005) result that BH UMa is an RR Lyr star that belongs to the RRc subgroup. The light curves showed a slight asymmetry of
D
= 0.453 with an amplitude of about 0.
^{m}
58 in
B
, 0.
^{m}
47 in
V
, and 0.
^{m}
11 in
B-V
and with a small hump between 0.
^{p}
82 and 0.
^{p}
86. We determined nine new times of minimum light and eight times of maximum light. We also analyzed all of the available unanalyzed minimum timings and found for the first time that the period of BH UMa has varied dramatically in at least three independent sinusoidal ways superposed on a secularly downward parabola over 66 years. The secular period decreasing rate was obtained as 6.
^{d}
684 × 10
^{-8}
y
^{-1}
, corresponding to -0.58 s/century. The semi-amplitude and period for each of the three sinusoidal variations were (0.
^{d}
058, 14.
^{y}
44), (0.
^{d}
044, 9.
^{y}
98), and (0.
^{d}
005, 0.
^{y}
97), respectively. It is uncertain whether the periodicity for the shortest period of 0.
^{y}
97 is real or spurious. The secular period decrease, well consistent with those of the other RRc stars,could be considered as a natural result of the evolution of the BH UMa system. The two possible sinusoidal terms were interpreted as both two light-time effects due to two additional bodies orbiting BH UMa and combinations of random fluctuations in the pulsation period of BH UMa. Two interpretations were shortly discussed with related parameters.
^{d}
3 to 1.
^{d}
0 and pulsation amplitudes smaller than about 2 mag in the
V
band.They are low mass central He burning Pop II stars, located in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram on the horizontal branch evolutionary phase with an absolute magnitude in the
V
band ranging from ~0 to ~1 mag. There are two main subgroups: RRab, which oscillates in the fundamental mode, and RRc, which pulsates in the first overtone mode. The RRc stars have shorter periods, smaller amplitudes, and more symmetric light curves than the RRab stars. Both the light curves and the pulsation periods of RRc stars vary in time. The former is known as the Blazhko effect, and the latter is known to vary in diverse patterns such as secular, sinusoidal, or erratic changes.
BH UMa (BV 36, CSV 6796, GSC 03449-00652), which was discovered as a variable star by von Geyer in 1955(Meinunger 1965), has been known for a long time as a W UMa eclipsing binary star with a period of 0.
^{d}
6987. Götz& Wenzel (1962) assigned the spectral type of BH UMa to B9. The first photographic light curve was published by Meinunger (1965), who obtained many plate times of minimum and determined a light elements as
Min I
= HJD 2430496.455 + 0.
^{d}
698685
E
. He classified BH UMa as a W UMa binary star from the shape of its light curve. Since Meinunger's study, numerous times of minimum lights have been published (Kreiner et al. 2001). Recently, Krajci (2005) observed the star without any filters and found that it was not a W UMa binary star but an RR Lyr star belonging to the RRc subtype. He determined a light elements as
Max I
= HJD 2453053.6545 + 0.
^{d}
349350
E
. As far as we know, no filtered light curves have been published.In this paper, we presented the
BV
light curves of BH UMa confirming the star to be the RRc subtype of RR Lyr stars, and we analyzed all published timings, including ours, to obtain a general understanding of the period behavior.
BV
charge coupled device (CCD) observations of BH UMa were made on 17 nights during March and April 2008 with the 35-cm reflector of campus station of Chungbuk National University Observatory in Korea. An SBIG ST-8 CCD imaging system, which was electrically cooled with a 19' × 12' field of view, and a standard
BV
filter set were used. GSC 3449-707 and GSC 3449-726 were chosen as the comparison and check stars, respectively. Our
The finding chart of BH UMa. The field of view is about 19'×12'. "C" and "K" denote the comparison (GSC 3449-707) and check (GSC 3449-726) stars respectively. "V1" is a new short period (0.^{d}5607) β Lyr eclipsing binary (GSC 3449-680) discovered during our observations. "V2" was recently discovered as a W UMa binary (GSC 3449-688) by Nelson et al. (2004).
The characteristics of BH UMa comparison and check stars. ^{a}Standard magnitude estimated in this paper. ^{b}Standard magnitude given by Nelson et al. (2004).
110comparison and check stars were the same ones used by Nelson et al. (2004). The characteristics of the variable, comparison and check stars are listed in
Table 1
.
Fig. 1
shows one of our CCD images in which our program stars are marked with two variable stars discovered by us in this paper (V1) and recently by Nelson et al. (2004) (V2). The camera exposure time ranged between 50 s and 140 s, depending on the quality of the night and the filter response.
The instrumentation and the reduction method used for the raw CCD frames have been described in detail by Kim et al. (2006). The resulting standard errors of our observations in terms of comparison minus check star were about ±0.
^{m}
02 in blue and ±0.
^{m}
01 in yellow. A total of 1,736 individual observations were obtained in two colors (866 in blue and 870 in yellow) and are available at the website
^{1}
. From our
BV
observations, nine times of minimum light and eight times of maximum light were obtained by the conventional Kwee & van Woerden (1956) method. Each of these timings, as listed in
Table 2
, was a weighted-mean of two
BV
timings defining the same epoch.
BV
light curves of BH UMa, as shown in the top of
Fig. 2
, were phased with the new light elements as:
which was determined by a least-square scheme with the times of maximum lights in
Table 2
. The Krajci’s (2005) white light curve was also drawn in the bottom of
Fig. 2
, which was phased with his light elements as:
Our light curves and Krajci's light curves are similar, both showing that BH UMa is really an RR Lyr star belonging to the RRc subgroup. Compared with Krajci's light curve, our light curves phased with Eq. (2) show a large phase shift of about 0.
^{p}
3, which corresponds to about 0.
^{d}
105 (~2.5 hours). This phase shift may indicate a large period change even in the time interval of about 4.
^{y}
2 between two observing seasons (see also the periods in Eqs. (1) and (2)). We will discuss this change in more detail in the next section
The light curves in
Fig. 2
a are slightly asymmetrical
with the descending branch from the maximum (Max) to the minimum (Min) at about 0.
^{p}
55 taking 4
^{h}
32
^{m}
and with the ascending branch from the Min to the Max taking 3
^{h}
48
^{m}
. The ratio
D
of the Min-to-Max time to the period is
(a) The BV light and (B-V) color curves of BH UMa. (b) The Krajci's (2005) light curve.
New times of minimum or maximum light of BH UMa. ^{a}All timings were weighted-mean values of two BV timings defining thesame epoch. ^{b}Determined in this paper from Krajci's (2005) observations. cDetermined in this paper from SuperWASP's archived observations.
0.453, a typical value of RRc stars. The variation amplitudes are about 0.
^{m}
58 in
B
and 0.
^{m}
47 in
V
. A small hump exists between 0.
^{p}
82 and 0.
^{p}
86 with the second Max and the second Min. The depths of the hump (the brightness difference between the second Max and the second Min) are about 0.
^{m}
02 and 0.
^{m}
01 in the
B
and
V
filters, respectively.We also noticed that the ascending branch from the Min to the second Max is steeper than that from the second Min to the Max. The
B-V
color curve also shows a variation pattern similar to those of the individual
BV
light curves. The difference of the
B-V
values between the Max and the Min is about 0.
^{m}
11. The
BV
magnitudes of BH UMa measured at several characteristic phases (Max, Min, and Hump) are listed in
Table 3
. These magnitudes are differential relative to our comparison star (GSC 03449-0707).
Although our observations were not standardized, it would be possible to roughly estimate the
BV
standard magnitudes of BH UMa because the
BV
standard magnitudes for the comparison and check stars was given by Nelson et al. (2004), as given in
Table 1
, and the instrumental magnitudes for the comparison and check stars were measured by us. Our instrumental and standardized Δ
m
(check-comparison) are 1.397 (±0.024) and 1.379 (±0.022) for the B filter and 1.491 (±0.010) and 1.513 (±0.012) for the V filter, respectively. Their differences relative to the standardized magnitude are 0.018 (±0.023) and -0.022 (±0.011) for the
B
and
V
filters, respectively. If these constant values are applied to the instrumental and standardized Δ
m
(BH UMa-comparison), then the
BV
standard magnitudes for BH UMa could be estimated as those given in the first row of
Table 1
, which should be tentative magnitudes.
^{1}http://binary.chungbuk.ac.kr/bbs/zboard.php?id=lab_photometry
O-C
) diagrams where the abscissa is usually time or cycle counted with an adopted ephemeris and where the ordinate is the difference between the observed times (
O
) of a particular phase
The brightness and color of BH UMa at several characteristic phases.
Times of minima of BH UMa. ^{a}P: plate, VI: visual, CCD: charge coupled device.
(e.g., the maximum, minimum, or the mid-point on the ascending branch of the light curve) and the predicted time of the same phase (
C
), calculated according to the same ephemeris. In recent years, another method has often been used where the (
O-C
) data are calculated as the time shift between the entire observed light curve and the normal light curve, rather than from one specific phase. This method is known to produce more stable results for period change investigation (Szeidel et al. 2011).
To investigate the period variation of BH UMa, we used the times of minimum light instead of those of maximum light because only nine maximum light timings were distributed locally in a short time interval of about 4 years, while the minimum light timings are numerous and widespread over 66 years. A total of 69 (22 visual, 27 sky patrol, and 20 CCD) times of minimum light, including ours in
Table 2
, have been collected from a modern database (Kreiner et al. 2001) and from the recent literature. These timings are listed in
Table 4
where one time of HJD2453053.4854 was determined by us from the Krajci's (2005) observations.
The (
O-C
) residuals of all timings in
Table 4
were calculated with the following linear ephemeris:
The ephemeris was adopted from the o-c gateway
^{2}
managed by the Czech Astronomical Society. The (
O-C
) diagram is shown in
Fig. 3
where crosses and open circles represent non-CCD and CCD minima, respectively. The three groups of (
O-C
) residuals during the early, mid-, and late 1990s (denoted as (a), (b) and (c) in
Fig. 3
, respectively) show dramatic jumps (or discontinuities)when compared with the neighboring residuals, which indicates the occurrence of a 'cycle slip' effect (or cycle-count uncertainties) rather than a series of a sudden real change during the time interval. The cycle slip effects may occur frequently in the
O-C
diagrams of RR Lyrae variables (Szeidl et al. 2011), cataclysmic variables (Kim et al. 2005, Andronov et al. 2006), and some eclipsing variables (Kang et al. 2004), showing very fast period changes in a short time interval. This effect could be solved by properly adjusting the cycles (Kim et al. 2005). Thus, the (
O-C
) values (plotted in red) for the timings corresponding to such jumping residuals were recalculated with Eq. (3) by adding one cycle to their cycle numbers. After adding one cycle, the residuals for group (a) are still discontinuous from the neighboring residuals, while the residuals for groups (b) and (c) show beautiful continuity with those measured since 2000. After adding two cycles, the (
O-C
) values of the timings of group (a) were recalculated with the same equation and were plotted in blue in
Fig. 3
, showing that the discontinuity has disappeared.
This procedure was applied to all of the timings prior to 1990
^{y}
to form continuous (
O-C
) residuals with their neighboring ones. The resultant (
O-C
) residuals were shown in the upper panel of
Fig. 4
and were listed in the fourth column of
Table 4
. In the calculation, the cycle correction for each timing was made with the cycle slip number (Δ
E
) given in the third column of
Table 4
. The diagram shows a clear long-term parabolic trend with small disturbances. A least-square fit of the trend to a quadratic
The (O-C) diagram of BH UMa. The (O-C) residuals during the early mid and late 1990s denoted as (a) (b) and (c) respectively show dramatic jumps compared with the neighboring residuals indicating that a 'cycle slip' effect in the (O-C) calculation had occurred. The residuals in red color were recalculated with Eq. (3) by adding one cycle to their cycle numbers. The blue ones were obtained by adding two cycles to their cycle numbers (see the text for more detail).
The (O-C) diagram of BH UMa after the cycle corrections. The continuous line represents the quadratic term of Eq. (4). The residuals from Eq. (4) were drawn in the bottom panel.
ephemeris was made to find the following ephemeris:
where the parenthesized value to the right of each term is its standard error. In this and subsequent calculations, the weight of the CCD minima was given ten times that of each of the non-CCD minima, according to the ratio of the inversely squared values of each scatter for non-CCD and CCD minima. The continuous line in
Fig. 4
, which fits quite well to the residuals, was drawn by using the quadratic term in Eq. (4). The secular period decreasing rate was deduced as -0.58 s/century from the quadratic coef-
The power spectra of the residuals in the bottom panel of Fig. 4 . The frequencies are: f_{1} = 0.000772 cycle/d f_{2} = 0.000465 cycle/d and f_{3} = 0.002949 cycle/d.
Top: the (O-C) diagram of BH UMa constructed with the linear term of Eq. (5). The continuous line is the contribution from the cyclic terms of Eq. (5). Bottom: the residual from Eq. (5).
ficient. In the bottom panel of
Fig. 4
, there were plotted the residuals from Eq. (4) which show large short-term changes of period, especially in the recent CCD minima. The residuals for non-CCD minima seemed to have large scatters, but a careful investigation suggests that the scatters could result from very fast period changes in a short-time interval (several years). Therefore, period searches for all the residuals in the bottom panel of
Fig. 4
were made with the Lomb-Scargle periodogram (Lomb 1976, Scargle 1982). The resulting power spectrum shown in
Fig. 5
reveals at least three meaningful peaks at
f
_{1}
= 0.000772 cycle/d,
f
_{2}
= 0.000465 cycle/d, and
f
_{3}
=0.002949 cycle/d in the order of their powers, corresponding to 3.
^{y}
56, 5.
^{y}
95, and 0.
^{y}
93, respectively. These three periodicities were then compared with three independent sine curves; namely, all of the residuals were fitted to the ephemeris with three sine functions as follows:
where
A_{i}, B_{i},
and
C_{i}
are the semi-amplitude, angular speed (=2π /
P_{i}
), and initial phase of each sine curve, respectively.The eleven fitting parameters in Eq. (5) were iteratively searched for using the Levenberg-Maquardt method (Press et al. 1992). The three periods obtained with the above periodogram analysis were used as the initial parameters for
B_{i}
. The initial parameters for
A_{i}
and
C_{i}
were estimated from
Fig. 4
. The final solution converged quickly,and the results are listed in
Table 5
, wherein the parenthesized values give the standard deviations of the tabulated quantities.
Fig. 6
shows our final solution, where the top panel shows the cyclical components of the fitting to the residuals and where the lower panel gives the residuals from all terms in Eq. (5). Interestingly, the two longer periods among the three periods in
Table 5
were quite different from those by the periodogram analysis while the shortest ones were consistent with each other. The ratios of the two longer periods (
P
_{1}
and
P
_{2}
) relative to the
Final solution of Eq. (5).
Top to bottom: the O-C diagrams phased with the periods of 14.^{y}44 9.^{y}98 and 0.^{y}97 respectively.
shorter one (
P
_{3}
= 0.
^{y}
968) are 14.92 and 10.31; no commensurability between them was found. From top to bottom in
Fig. 7
, three different (
O-C
) diagrams were phased with the three periods of 14.
^{y}
41, 9.
^{y}
98, and 0.
^{y}
97, respectively. As seen in the figure, the residuals in the bottom diagram were not represented by the sine curve with the shortest period of 0.
^{y}
97, which may be spurious, while the two sine curves with longer periods seemed to fit successfully to the observed timings, especially to the CCD ones.
^{2}http://var.astro.cz/ocgate/
BV
light curves of BH UMa and confirmed Krajci's (2005) result that BH UMa is an RR Lyr star that belongs to the RRc subgroup. The light curves showed a slight asymmetry of
D
= 0.453 with the amplitude of about 0.
^{m}
58 in
B
, 0.
^{m}
47 in
V
, and 0.11 in
B-V
and with a small hump between 0.
^{p}
82 and 0.
^{p}
86. Nine times of minimum light and eight times of maximum light were obtained from our
BV
observations. A total of 69 minimum timings available to us were intensively analyzed for the first time. The period of BH UMa was found to have varied dramatically in at least three independent sinusoidal ways superposed on a secularly downward parabola over 66 years. The secular period decreasing rate was obtained as 6.
^{d}
684 × 10
^{-8}
y
^{-1}
, corresponding to -0.58 s/century. The semi-amplitude and the period for each of the three sinusoidal variations were (0.
^{d}
058, 14.
^{y}
44), (0.
^{d}
044, 9.
^{y}
98), and (0.
^{d}
005, 0.
^{y}
97), respectively. It is currently uncertain whether the periodicity for the shortest period of 0.
^{y}
97 is real or spurious. More accurate timings are needed to resolve the ambiguity.
The secular period decrease would be a natural result of evolution of the BH UMa system, as many investigators have argued (Smith 1997, Marconi 2009, Szeidl et al. 2011). As Smith (1997) discussed, the quantity α (= (1/
P
)(d
P
/dt)) for BH UMa, where the time interval dt is taken to be 10
^{6}
years, is about 0.191, which is consistent with those of other RRc stars (
Fig. 2
of Smith's (1997) paper). The two sinusoidal period variations may be due to two light-time effects caused by two hypothetical tertiaries in the BH UMa system. With the parameters in
Table 5
, the mass functions were obtained to be 4.44 ± 0.31
M
_{⊙}
for the 9.
^{y}
98 period and 4.86 ± 0.31
M
_{⊙}
for the 14.
^{y}
44 one. Such large mass functions imply that the companions have relatively high masses and that the orbit is likely to be second edge-on if the second and third companions exist. If the mass of BH UMa was assumed to be 0.55
M
_{⊙}
, a mean mass typical of RR Lyrae stars, then the implied minimum masses for the second and the third bodies would be 5.3 ± 0.3
M
_{⊙}
and 11.3 ± 0.8
M
_{⊙}
, respectively, which are about 10 and 20 times larger than that of BH UMa. Alternatively, if two sinusoidal trends of the (
O-C
) residuals in
Fig. 7
could be assumed to occur by chance, then they might arise from random fluctuations (or erratic changes) in the pulsation period of BH UMa, which have been attributed not to a star's secular evolution but to various causes such as mixing events in the stellar core (Sweigart & Renzini 1979), hydromagnetic events (Stothers 1980), convection (Stothers 2010), or passage through the RR Lyrae instability strip (Silva Aguirre et al. 2008). At the moment, no method is available to discern which mechanism among the existing theories is responsible for the observed changes in the pulsation period of BH UMa. However, the seemingly sinusoidal period changes could be produced if two or more mechanisms are concurrently active.
With the continuous monitoring of timings, high-precision observations of radial velocity curve and light curves are needed to understand this intriguing system.

1. INTRODUCTION

RR Lyr pulsating variables belong to a stellar group with short periods ranging from ~0.
2. OBSERVATIONS AND LIGHT CURVES

- 2.1 Observations

The
Lager Image

The characteristics of BH UMa comparison and check stars.aStandard magnitude estimated in this paper.bStandard magnitude given by Nelson et al. (2004).

Lager Image

- 2.2 New Light Curves

From our observations, the new
Lager Image

Lager Image

Lager Image

New times of minimum or maximum light of BH UMa.aAll timings were weighted-mean values of two BV timings defining thesame epoch.bDetermined in this paper from Krajci's (2005) observations.cDetermined in this paper from SuperWASP's archived observations.

Lager Image

3. PERIOD STUDY

In general, the period changes of variable stars have been investigated with their (
The brightness and color of BH UMa at several characteristic phases.

Lager Image

Times of minima of BH UMa.aP: plate, VI: visual, CCD: charge coupled device.

Lager Image

Lager Image

Lager Image

Lager Image

Lager Image

Lager Image

Lager Image

Lager Image

Final solution of Eq. (5).

Lager Image

Lager Image

4. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION

We presented the first
Acknowledgements

We thank all the students of Chungbuk National University who took part in the observation program of BH UMa. The availability of the CDS Simbad data resource continues to be of great value to us. This work was supported by the research grant of Chungbuk National University in 2009.

Andronov IL
,
Baklanov AV
,
Burwitz V
2006
The unique magnetic cataclysmic variable V1432 Aql (Research Note) Third type of minima and synchronization
A&A
452
941 -
944
** DOI : 10.1051/0004-6361:20054117**

Blättler E
1987
117rd List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull
84
5 -

Brát L
,
Zejda M
,
Svoboda P
2007
B.R.N.O. contributions # 34
OEJV
74
1 -

Diethelm R
1975
56th List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull
23
6 -

Diethelm R
1980
79rd List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull
46
4 -

Diethelm R
2001
157. List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull
124
9 -

Dvorak SW
2004
Times of minima for neglected eclipsing binaries in 2003
IBVS
5502
1 -

German R
1982
93rd List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull
60
4 -

German R
1988
120th List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull
87
5 -

Götz W
,
Wenzel W
1962
Spektraltypen von Verönderlichen (Fortsetzung) Mitt. Verönderliche Sterne
Sonneberg
2
702 -

Kang YW
,
Lee HW
,
Hong KS
,
Kim C-H
,
Guinan EF
2004
The chromospherically active contact binary CE Leonis
AJ
128
846 -
857
** DOI : 10.1086/422706**

Kim C-H
,
Lee C-U
,
Yoon Y-N
,
Park S-S
,
Kim D-H
,
Cha S-M
,
Won J-H
New CCD times of minima of eclipsing binary systems
IBVS
5694
1 -
2006

Kim YG
,
Andronov IL
,
Park SS
,
Jeon YB
2005
Orbital and spin variability of the intermediate polar BG CMi
A&A
441
663 -
674
** DOI : 10.1051/0004-6361:20052995**

Kohl M
1996
144. List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull
111
9 -

Kohl M
1997
147. List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull
114
13 -

Krajci T
2005
Observations of variable stars
IBVS
5599
1 -

Kreiner JM
,
Kim C-H
,
Nha I-S
2001
An atlas of (O-C) diagrams of eclipsing binary stars
Wydawn. Nauk. Akad
PedagogicznejKrakow

Kwee KK
,
van Woerden H
1956
A method for computing accurately the epoch of minimum of an eclipsing variable
BAN
12
327 -
330

Lomb NR
1976
Least-squares frequency analysis of unequally spaced data
Ap&SS
39
447 -
462
** DOI : 10.1007/BF00648343**

Marconi M
2009
RR Lyrae pulsation theory
AIP Conf. Proc.
1170
223 -
234
** DOI : 10.1063/1.3246450**

Meinunger L
1965
21 wenig bekannte oder falsch klassizizerte veranderliche Mitt. Veranderliche Sterne
Sonneberg
3
9 -

Nagai K
2006
Visual and CCD minima of eclipsing binaries during 2005
Var. Star Bull. Japan
44
1 -

Nelson RH
2004
CCD minima for selected eclipsing binaries in 2003
IBVS
5493
1 -

Nelson RH
,
Henden AA
,
Krajci T
2004
A new solar-type overcontact binary
IBVS
5546
1 -

Peter H
1989
124. List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull.
91
13 -

Peter H
(1991a
130. List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull.
97
10 -

Peter H
1991b
131. List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull
98
10 -

Peter H
1992
134. List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull
101
7 -

Peter H
1993
137. List of minima of eclipsing binaries
BBSAG Bull
104
6 -

Press WH
,
Teukolsky SA
,
Vetterling WT
,
Flannery BP
Numericalrecipes
Cambridge University Press
Cambridge
Chap. 15 -

Scargle JD
1982
Studies astronomical time series analysis. II. Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data
ApJ
263
835 -
853
** DOI : 10.1086/160554**

Silva Aguirre V
,
Catelan M
,
Weiss A
,
Valcarce AAR
2008
Stellar evolutionand variability in the pre-ZAHB phase
A&A
489
1201 -
1208
** DOI : 10.1051/0004-6361:200810047**

Smith H
1997
RR Lyrae period changes: still puzzling after all these years
BaltA
6
89 -
95

Stothers R
1980
Hydromagnetics and period changes in RR Lyrae stars
PASP
92
475 -
478
** DOI : 10.1086/130696**

Stothers RB
2010
Observational evidence of convective cycles as the cause of the Blazhko effect in RR Lyrae stars
PASP
122
536 -
540
** DOI : 10.1086/652909**

Sweigart AV
,
Renzini A
1979
Semiconvection and period changes in RR Lyrae stars
A&A
71
66 -
78

Szeidl B
,
Hurta Zs
,
Jurcsik J
,
Clement C
,
Lovas M
2011
Long-term photometric monitoring of Messier 5 variables I.Period changes of RR Lyrae stars
MNRAS
411
1744 -
1762
** DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17815.x**

Citing 'The BV Photometry of the RR Lyrae Star, BH Ursae Majoris: Light Curves and Period Study
'

@article{ OJOOBS_2011_v28n2_109}
,title={The BV Photometry of the RR Lyrae Star, BH Ursae Majoris: Light Curves and Period Study}
,volume={2}
, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2011.28.2.109}, DOI={10.5140/JASS.2011.28.2.109}
, number= {2}
, journal={Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences}
, publisher={The Korean Space Science Society}
, author={Kim, Chun-Hwey
and
Jeong1, Jang Hae}
, year={2011}
, month={Jun}