Mixotrophic protists play diverse roles in marine food webs as predators and prey. Thus, exploring mixotrophy in phototrophic protists has emerged as a critical step in understanding marine food webs and cycling of materials in marine ecosystem. To investigate the feeding of newly described mixotrophic dinoflagellate
Ansanella granifera
, we explored the feeding mechanism and the different types of species that
A. granifera
was able to feed on. In addition, we measured the growth and ingestion rates of
A. granifera
feeding on the prasinophyte
Pyramimonas
sp., the only algal prey, as a function of prey concentration.
A. granifera
was able to feed on heterotrophic bacteria and the cyanobacterium
Synechococcus
sp. However, among the 12 species of algal prey offered,
A. granifera
ingested only
Pyramimonas
sp.
A. granifera
ingested the algal prey cell by engulfment. With increasing mean prey concentration, the growth rate of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. increased rapidly, but became saturated at a concentration of 434 ng C mL
-1
(10,845 cells mL
-1
). The maximum specific growth rate (i.e., mixotrophic growth) of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. was 1.426 d
-1
, at 20℃ under a 14 : 10 h light-dark cycle of 20 μE m
-2
s
-1
, while the growth rate (i.e., phototrophic growth) under similar light conditions without added prey was 0.391 d
-1
. With increasing mean prey concentration, the ingestion rate of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. increased rapidly, but slightly at the concentrations ≥306 ng C mL
-1
(7,649 cells mL
-1
). The maximum ingestion rate of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. was 0.97 ng C predator
-1
d
-1
(24.3 cells grazer
-1
d
-1
). The calculated grazing coefficients for
A. granifera
feeding on co-occurring
Pyramimonas
sp. were up to 2.78 d
-1
. The results of the present study suggest that
A. granifera
can sometimes have a considerable grazing impact on the population of
Pyramimonas
spp.
INTRODUCTION
Phototrophic dinoflagellates are one of the major components in marine planktonic communities (
Smayda 1997
,
Jeong et al. 2013
,
2013
,
Park et al. 2013
). For a long time, these dinoflagellates were treated as phytoplankton, which can survive only by photosynthesis. However, in the last 2 decades, tens of phototrophic dinoflagellates have been revealed to be mixotrophic (
Stoecker 1999
,
Jeong et al. 2005
,
2010
,
2012
,
Turner 2006
,
Burkholder et al. 2008
,
Kang et al. 2011
); they are known to feed on diverse prey, such as heterotrophic bacteria, cyanobacteria, small flagellates, other mixotrophic dinoflagellates, and ciliates (
Stoecker et al. 1997
,
Jeong et al. 1999
,
2005
,
2005
,
2005
,
2010
,
2012
,
Li et al. 1999
,
Park et al. 2006
,
Seong et al. 2006
,
Berge et al. 2008
,
2008
,
Glibert et al. 2009
,
Yoo et al. 2009
,
Kang et al. 2011
). Thus, discovery of mixotrophy in phototrophic dinoflagellates increase the complexity in food webs, but help in better understanding predator-prey relationships and cycling of materials in the food webs (
Jeong et al. 2010
). Some mixotrophic dinoflagellates sometimes have considerable grazing impact on populations of prey species (
Jeong et al. 2005
). Recently, several new genera and / or species of phototrophic dinoflagellates have been established (
Moestrup et al. 2008
,
2009
,
2009
,
Kang et al. 2010
,
Jeong et al. 2014
). To understand the eco-physiology of a phototrophic dinoflagellate and its roles in planktonic food webs of the ecosystem, the feeding ability, type of prey, feeding mechanisms, growth and ingestion rates of this phototrophic dinoflagellate need to be explored.
Recently, we found a new mixotrophic dinoflagellate
Ansanella granifera
in Shiwha Bay, Korea (
Jeong et al. 2014
). This newly isolated, thin-walled dinoflagellate has a type E eyespot and a single elongated apical vesicle, and it is closely related to species belonging to the family Suessiaceae.
Ansanella granifera
has 10-14 horizontal rows of amphiesmal vesicles, comparable to
Biecheleria
spp. and
Biecheleriopsis adriatica
, but greater in number than in other species of the family Suessiaceae (
Montresor et al. 1999
,
Kremp et al. 2005
,
Moestrup et al. 2009
,
2009
,
Siano et al. 2009
,
2010
,
Kang et al. 2011
,
Luo et al. 2013
,
Jeong et al. 2014
,
2014
,
Takahashi et al. 2014
). Unlike
Biecheleria
spp. and
B. adriatica, A. granifera
has grana-like thylakoids (
Horiguchi and Pienaar 1994
,
1994
,
Moestrup et al. 2009
,
2009
,
Jeong et al. 2014
). Further,
A. granifera
lacks a nuclear fibrous connective, which is present in B. adriatica (
Moestrup et al. 2009
,
Jeong et al. 2014
).
B. adriatica
and
A. granifera
also show a morphological difference in the shape of the margin of the cingulum. In
A. granifera
, the cingular margin formed a zigzag line, and in
B. adriatica
a straight line, especially on the dorsal side of the cell (
Moestrup et al. 2009
,
Jeong et al. 2014
,
Takahashi et al. 2014
). The main accessory pigment is peridinin. The small subunit (SSU), internal transcribed spacer regions, and large subunit (LSU) rDNA sequences differ considerably from those of the other known genera in the order Suessiales.
A. granifera
has a 51-base pair fragment in domain D2 of the LSU of ribosomal RNA, which is absent in the genus
Biecheleria
. In the phylogenetic tree based on the SSU and LSU sequences,
A. granifera
belongs to the large clade of the family Suessiaceae, but a small clade containing this dinoflagellate is clearly divergent from other small clades in the family (
Jeong et al. 2014
).
We established a clonal culture of
A. granifera
and observed its feeding behavior under high-resolution videomicroscopy in order to explore the feeding mechanisms and determine the prey species when diverse algal species were provided. We also conducted experiments to determine the effects of prey concentration on the growth and ingestion rates of
A. granifera
feeding on the prasinophyte
Pyramimonas
sp., the only algal prey, as a function of prey concentration. In addition, we estimated the grazing coefficients attributable to
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. using the ingestion rate obtained from the laboratory experiments and the abundances of predators and prey in the field. The abundances of
A. granifera
and
Pyramimonas
sp. were quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The results of the present study provide a basis for understanding the feeding mechanisms and ecological roles of
A. granifera
in marine planktonic food webs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
- Preparation of the experimental organisms
The phytoplankton species were grown at 20℃ in enriched f/2 seawater media under an illumination of 20 μE m
-2
s
-1
of cool white fluorescent light on a 14 : 10 h light-dark cycle. The mean equivalent spherical diameter (ESD) ± standard deviation was measured by using an electronic particle counter (Coulter Multisizer II; Coulter Corporation, Miami, FL, USA).
Synechococcus
sp. (Genbank accession Nos. DQ023295; ESD = ca. 1 μm) were grown at 20℃ and 30-31 salinity in enriched f/2 seawater media under a 14 : 10 h light-dark cycle with 20 μE m
-2
s
-1
of cool white fluorescent light. The heterotrophic bacterial cells that originated from a clonal culture of
A. granifera
were fluorescently labeled (FLB), following the method of Sherr et al. (1987). To remove any aggregated FLB, the FLB were dispersed throughout the medium using a sonicator (Bransoic cleaner 5510E-DTH; Bransoic, Danbury, CT, USA) for 10-30 min and then filtered through 3-μm poresized filter (Polycarbonate; Whatman, Dassel, Germany).
Plankton samples were collected with a water sampler from Shiwha Bay, Korea (37˚18′ N, 126˚36′ E), during September 2010, when the water temperature and salinity were 21.3℃ and 15.6, respectively (
Jeong et al. 2014
). The samples were filtered gently through a 154-μm Nitex mesh and placed in 6-well tissue culture plates. A clonal culture of
A. granifera
was established following two serial single-cell isolations. As the concentration of
A. granifera
increased,
A. granifera
was subsequently transferred to 32, 270, and 500-mL polycarbonate (PC) bottles containing fresh f/2 seawater media. The bottles were again filled to capacity with freshly filtered seawater, capped, and placed on a shelf at 20℃ under 20 μE m
-2
s
-1
illumination provided by cool white fluorescent lights in a 14 : 10 h light-dark cycle.
The carbon contents of
A. granifera
(0.11 ng C per cell) and
Pyramimonas
sp. (0.04 ng C per cell) were measured using a CHN Analyzer (vario MICRO; Elementar, Hanau, Germany) and those of the other phytoplankton species were obtained from our previous studies (
Jeong et al. 2010
,
2011
,
2012
,
Yoo et al. 2010
,
Kang et al. 2011
).
- Prey species
Experiment 1 was designed to investigate whether
A. granifera
was able to feed on different target algal species when unialgal diets of diverse algal species were provided (
Table 1
). The initial concentrations of each algal species offered were similar, in terms of carbon biomass. To confirm that some of the algal species were not ingested by
A. granifera
, additional higher prey concentrations were provided.
Taxa, sizes, and concentration of prey species offered as food toAnsanella graniferain Experiment 1
The abundances of the predator for each target prey were 5,000 cells mL-1. ESD, mean equivalent spherical diameter (μm) ± standard deviation (SD) of the mean was measured by an electronic particle counter (Coulter Multisizer II; Coulter Corporation, Miami, FL, USA); Y, A. granifera was observed to feed on a living food cell; N, A. granifera was observed not to feed on a living food cell; T, thecate; NT, nonthecate. n > 2,000 for each species.
A dense culture (ca. 100,000-200,000 cells mL
-1
) of
A. granifera
grown photosynthetically was transferred to a 1-L PC bottle containing f/2 medium and maintained in f/2 media for 2 d. Three 1-mL aliquots were then removed from the bottle and examined using a compound microscope to determine
A. granifera
concentration.
In this experiment, the initial concentrations of
A. granifera
and each target algal species were determined by using an autopipette to deliver a predetermined volume of culture with a known cell density to the experimental bottles. Triplicate 80-mL PC bottles with mixtures of
A. granifera
and the target prey and duplicate predator control bottles containing
A. granifera
only were set up for each target algal species. The bottles were filled to capacity with freshly filtered seawater, capped, and then placed on a vertically rotating plate at 0.9 rpm and incubated at 20℃ under a 14 : 10 h light-dark cycle of cool white fluorescent light at 20 μE m
-2
s
-1
. After 12, 24, and 48 h, a 5-mL aliquot was removed from each bottle and transferred into a 20-mL bottle. Two 0.1-mL aliquots were placed on slides and then covered with cover-glasses. Under these conditions, the
A. granifera
cells were alive, but almost stationary. The protoplasms of >100
A. granifera
cells were carefully examined with a compound microscope and / or an epifluorescence microscope (Zeiss-Axiovert 200M; Carl Zeiss Ltd., G öttingen, Germany) at a magnification of ×100-630 to determine whether or not
A. granifera
was able to feed on target prey species. Images of the ingested cells of each target algal species inside
A. granifera
cells were taken using digital cameras mounted on the microscopes at a magnification of ×630-1,000.
For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), each of intact
Pyramimonas
cells
A. granifera
cell grown photosynthetically, and
A. granifera
cell satiated with
Pyramimonas
sp. was transferred to a 50-mL tube and fixed in 4% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in culture medium. After 1.5-2 h, the entire contents of the tube were placed in a 50-mL centrifuge tube and concentrated at 1,610 ×g for 10 min in a Vision Centrifuge (VS-5500; Vision Scientific Co., Bucheon, Korea). The pellet from the tube was then transferred to a 1.5-mL tube and rinsed with 0.2 M sodium cacodylic acid at pH 7.4. After several rinses in the medium, the cells were post-fixed in 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide in deionized water. The pellet was then embedded in agar. Subsequently, the pellet was dehydrated using a graded ethanol series (i.e., 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100% ethanol, followed by two 100% ethanol steps). The material was embedded in Spurr’s low-viscosity resin (Spurr 1969). Sections were obtained using an RMC MT-XL ultramicrotome (Boeckeler Instruments Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) and stained with 3% (w/v) aqueous uranyl acetate followed by 2% (w/v) lead citrate. The sections were observed using a JEOL-1010 electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
- Feeding mechanisms
Experiment 2 was designed to investigate the feeding behaviors of
A. granifera
when a unialgal diet of
Pyramimonas
sp., the only algal prey, was provided. The ingestion of these prey species by
A. granifera
was observed in Experiment 1. The initial concentrations of predators and prey were the same as described previously.
The initial concentrations of
A. granifera
and the target algal species were established using an autopipette to deliver a predetermined volume of culture with a known cell density to the experimental bottles. One 80-mL PC bottle with a mixture of
A. granifera
and the algal prey was set up for each target algal species. The bottle was filled to capacity with freshly filtered seawater, capped, and then well mixed. After 1-min incubation, a 1-mL aliquot was removed from the bottle and transferred into a 1-mL Sedgewick-Rafter Chamber (SRCs). By monitoring the behavior of >30 unfed
A. granifera
cells for each target prey species under a compound microscope and / or an epifluorescence microscope at a magnification of ×100-630, all of the feeding processes were observed. A series of images showing the feeding process of a
A. granifera
cell was taken using a video analyzing system (Sony DXC-C33; Sony Co., Tokyo, Japan) mounted on an epifluorescence microscope at a magnification of ×100-630.
- Growth and ingestion rates
Experiment 3 was designed to investigate the growth and ingestion rates of
A. granifera
. We measured the growth, ingestion, and clearance rates of
A. granifera
feeding on unialgal diet consisting of the optimal prey
Pyramimonas
sp. as a function of prey concentration.
A dense culture (ca. 32,000 cells mL
-1
) of
A. granifera
growing photosynthetically was transferred into a 1-L PC bottle containing freshly filtered seawater. The culture was transferred into one 1-L PC bottle. Three 1-mL aliquots from the bottle were counted using a compound microscope to determine the cellular concentrations of
A. granifera
in each bottle, and the cultures were then used to conduct experiments.
The initial concentrations of
A. granifera
and
Pyramimonas
sp. were established as described previously. Triplicate 42-mL PC experimental bottles containing mixtures of predators and prey, triplicate prey control bottles containing prey only, and triplicate predator control bottles containing predators only were set up for each predator-prey combination. To ensure similar experimental conditions, the water from
A. granifera
culture was filtered through a 0.7-μm GF/F filter and added to the prey control bottles at similar amounts as the volume of the predator culture added to the experiment bottles for each predator-prey combination. Next, 5 mL of f/2 medium was added to all the bottles, which were then filled to capacity with freshly filtered seawater and capped. Five milliliters of f/2 medium were added to all bottles, which were then filled to capacity with freshly filtered seawater and capped. To determine the actual initial predator and prey densities (cells mL
-1
) at the beginning of the experiment (
A. granifera
and
Pyramimonas
sp.: 16/237, 34/476, 51/2818, 49/5418, 96/11104, 291/71050, 525/133630) and after 2 d incubation, 5-mL aliquots were removed from each bottle and fixed with 5% Lugol’s solution, and all
A. granifera
cells and all or >300 prey cells in three 1-mL SRCs were enumerated. Prior to taking the subsamples, the condition of
A. granifera
and its prey was assessed under a dissecting microscope. The bottles were filled again to capacity with f/2 medium, capped, placed on a vertically rotating plate rotating at 0.9 rpm, and incubated at 20℃ under a 14 : 10 h light-dark cycle with 20 ℃E m
-2
s
-1
of cool white fluorescent light. The dilution of the cultures associated with refilling of the bottles was considered in calculating the growth and ingestion rates.
The specific growth rate of
A. granifera
, μ (d
-1
), was calculated as follows:
, where A
0
is the initial concentration of
A. granifera
and A
t
is the final concentration after time t. The time period was 2 d.
Data for
A. granifera
growth rate were fitted to the following equation:
, where μ
max
= the maximum growth rate (d
-1
), x = prey concentration (cells mL
-1
or ng C mL
-1
), x' = threshold prey concentration (the prey concentration where μ = 0), and K
GR
= the prey concentration sustaining 1/2 μ
max
. Data were iteratively fitted to the model using DeltaGraph (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Ingestion and clearance rates for 2 d were also calculated using the equations of
Frost (1972)
and
Heinbokel (1978)
. The incubation times for calculating the ingestion and clearance rates were the same as for estimating the growth rate.
Ingestion rate data were fitted to a Michaelis-Menten equation:
, where I
max
= the maximum ingestion rate (cells predator
-1
d
-1
or ng C predator
-1
d
-1
), x = prey concentration (cells mL
-1
or ng C mL
-1
), and K
IR
= the prey concentration sustaining 1/2 I
max
.
- Cell volume ofAnsanella granifera
After the 2-d incubation, the cell length and maximum width of
A. granifera
preserved in 5% acid Lugol’s solution (n = 10-30 for each prey concentration) were measured using an image analysis system on images collected with a epifluorescence microscope (AxioVision 4.5; Carl Zeiss Ltd.). The shape of
A. granifera
was estimated to be oval. The cell volume of the preserved
A. granifera
was calculated according to the following equation: volume = 4/3 π [(cell length + cell width) / 4]
3
.
- Swimming speed
A dense culture (ca. 50,000 cells mL
-1
) of
A. granifera
growing photosynthetically was transferred into 500-mL PC bottle. An aliquot from the bottle was added to a 50-mL cell culture flask and allowed to acclimate for 30 min. The video camera was focused on one field seen as one circle in a cell culture flask under a dissecting microscope at 20℃ and the movement of
A. granifera
cells was then recorded at a magnification of ×40 using a video analyzing system (SV-C660; Samsung, Seoul, Korea) and taken using a CCD camera (KP-D20BU; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The mean and maximum swimming velocities were analyzed for all swimming cells seen for the first 10 min. The average swimming speed was calculated based on the linear displacement of cells in 1 s. during single-frame playback. The swimming speeds of 30 cells were measured.
- Potential grazing impact
By combining field data on the abundances of the predators and the target prey with the ingestion rates of the predator on the prey obtained in the present study, we estimated the grazing coefficients attributable to
A. granifera
feeding on co-occurring
Pyramimonas
sp. Data on the abundances of
A. granifera
and the co-occurring
Pyramimonas
sp. used in this estimate were obtained by analyzing the water samples taken from the waters inside and outside Shiwha Bay, Korea in 2010-2013 using realtime PCR.
The grazing coefficients (g, d
-1
) were calculated as:
, where CR (mL predator
-1
h
-1
) is the clearance rate of
A. granifera
feeding on a target prey at a prey concentration and PC is a predator concentration (cells mL
-1
). The CR values were calculated as:
, where IR (cells eaten predator
-1
h
-1
) is the ingestion rate of
A. granifera
feeding on the target prey and x (cells mL
-1
) is the prey concentration. These CR values were corrected using Q
10
= 2.8 (
Hansen et al. 1997
) because the in situ water temperature and the temperature used in the laboratory for this experiment (20℃) were sometimes different.
RESULTS
- Prey species
A. granifera
was able to feed on heterotrophic bacteria and the cyanobacterium
Synechococcus
sp. (
Fig. 1
). In addition, among 12 algal prey species (5-23 μm in equivalent spherical diameter) offered,
A. granifera
ingested only
Pyramimonas
sp. (
Table 1
,
Figs 1
-
3
). TEM confirmed that
A. granifera
ingested
Pyramimonas
cells (
Fig. 2
). Intact
Pyramimonas
cells had the pyrenoids surrounded by starch. These pyrenoids with starch were conserved inside the food vacuoles of predator cells. However, it did not feed on the prymnesiophyte
Isochrysis galbana,
the diatoms (
Skeletonema costatum
and
Chaetoceros calcitrans
), cryptophytes (e.g.,
Teleaulax
sp. and
Rhodomonas salina
), the raphidophyte
Heterosigma akashiwo
, the naked dinoflagellate (
Amphidinium carterae
), and thecate dinoflagellates (
Heterocapsa rotundata, Heterocapsa triquetra, Prorocentrum minimum
, and
Scrippsiella trochoidea
) (
Table 1
).
Feeding by the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Ansanella granifera feeding on bacteria and the prasinophyte Pyramimonas sp. (A) An A. granifera cell with 3 ingested fluorescent-labeled bacteria (arrows). (B) An A. granifera cell with 2 ingested cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. (arrows). (C) Unfed Pyramimonas cells. (D) An A. granifera (Ag) cell with 2 ingested Pyramimonas (Py) cells (arrows). Scale bars represent: A & B, 1 ℃m; C & D, 5 μm.
Transmission electron micrographs (TEM) of Ansanella granifera and Pyramimonas sp. (A) A unfed A. granifera cell showing its chloroplasts (C), eyespot (ES), grana-like thylakoids (GLT), nucleus (N), mitochondria (M), and pyrenoid (PY). (B) Unfed Pyramimonas sp. cells showing starch (S). (C) An A. granifera cell with 3 ingested Pyramimonas sp. cells. (D) Enlarged image of Fig. 2C showing an ingested prey cell having starch (S) inside the food vacuole, arrowheads: food vacuole. Scale bars represent: A & C, 2 μm; B & D, 0.5 μm.
- Feeding mechanisms
A. granifera
fed on
Pyramimonas
sp. by engulfment after spinning a prey cell (
Fig. 3
).
A. granifera
did not try to attack the other algal species when encountering an algal cell. Furthermore, with the exception of
Pyramimonas
sp., it did not spin around a target cell.
(A-F) Feeding process of a Ansanella granifera cell (Ag) feeding on a Pyramimonas sp. cell (Py) by engulfment. The white arrow indicates the prey cell. Scale bars represent: A-F, 5 μm.
- Growth and ingestion rates
With increasing mean prey concentration, the growth rate of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. increased rapidly, but became saturated at a concentration of 434 ng C mL
-1
(10,845 cells mL
-1
) (
Fig. 4
). When the data were fitted to Eq. (2), the maximum specific growth rate (i.e., mixotrophic growth) of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. was 1.426 d
-1
at 20℃ under a 14 : 10 h light-dark cycle of 20 μE m
-2
s
-1
, while its growth rate (i.e., phototrophic growth) under similar light conditions without added prey was 0.391 d
-1
. The K
GR
(i.e., the prey concentration sustaining 1/2 μ
max
) was 148 ng C mL
-1
(3,690 cells mL
-1
).
Specific growth rate of Ansanella granifera feeding on Pyramimonas sp. as a function of mean prey concentration (x, ng C mL-1). Symbols represent treatment means ± 1 standard error. The curve is fitted by a Michaelis-Menten equation [Eq. (2)] using all treatments in the experiment. Growth rate (d-1) = 1.426 [(x + 22.03) / (147.6 + [x + 22.03])], r2 = 0.854.
With increasing mean prey concentration, the ingestion rate of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. increased rapidly, but slightly at concentrations ≥306 ng C mL
-1
(7,649 cells mL
-1
) (
Fig. 5
). When the data were fitted to Eq. (3), the maximum ingestion rate of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. was 0.973 ng C predator
-1
d
-1
(24.3 cells grazer
-1
d
-1
) and K
IR
(the prey concentration sustaining 1/2 I
max
) was 198 ng C mL
-1
(4,958 cells mL
-1
). The maximum clearance rate of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. was 0.4 μL grazer
-1
h
-1
.
Ingestion rate of Ansanella granifera feeding on Pyramimonas sp. as a function of mean prey concentration (x, ng C mL-1). Symbols represent treatment means ± 1 standard error. The curve is fitted by a Michaelis-Menten equation [Eq. (3)] using all treatments in the experiment. Ingestion rate (d-1) = 0.973 [x / (198.3 + x)], r2 = 0.948.
- Cell volume
After a 2-d incubation, the mean cell volumes of
A. granifera
fed on
Pyramimonas
sp. at the lowest mean prey concentrations of 19-38 ng C mL
-1
(446-471 μm
3
) was comparable to those that were starved (492 μm
3
) (
Fig. 6
). The cell volume increased rapidly up to 1,039 μm
3
at the mean prey concentration of 2,794 ng C mL
-1
and then slowly up to 1,104 μm
3
at the mean prey concentration of 5,419 ng C mL
-1
.
The cell volume of Ansanella granifera feeding on Pyramimonas sp. after a 48-h incubation as a function of mean prey concentration. Symbols represent treatment means ± 1 standard error.
- Swimming speed
A. granifera
swam with alternating slow moving and very quick moving swims. The average (± standard error, n = 30) and maximum swimming speeds of
A. granifera
in the given conditions were 802 (± 51) and 1,603 μm s
-1
, respectively.
- Potential grazing impact
The grazing coefficients attributable to
A. granifera
feeding on co-occurring
Pyramimonas
sp. in the water samples taken in the waters of Shiwha Bay, Korea in 2010-2013 (n = 20), when the concentrations of
Pyramimonas
sp. and
A. granifera
were 3-53,243 cells mL
-1
and 1-403 cells mL
-1
, respectively, were 0.003-2.78 d
-1
(
Fig. 7
). The highest grazing coefficient was obtained when the concentration of
Pyramimonas
sp. and
A. granifera
were 1,053 cells mL
-1
and 403 cells mL
-1
, respectively. In 11 of 20 samples, the grazing coefficients attributable to
A. granifera
feeding on co-occurring
Pyramimonas
sp. exceeded 0.02 d
-1
.
Calculated grazing coefficients (h-1) attributable to Ansanella granifera feeding on natural populations of Pyramimonas sp. (see text for calculation) (n = 12).
DISCUSSION
- Feeding mechanisms and prey species
The mixotrophic dinoflagellate
A. granifera
fed on algal prey by engulfment. Similar-sized and shaped mixotrophic dinoflagellates
Biecheleria cincta
(previously
Woloszynskia cincta
),
Gymnodinium aureolum, Karlodinium armiger
, and
Paragymnodinium shiwhaense
, along with the heterotrophic dinoflagellates
Gyrodiniellum shiwhaense, Luciella masanensis, Pfiesteria piscicida
, and
Stoeckeria algicida
, feed on algal prey using a peduncle (
Burkholder et al. 1992
,
Jeong et al. 2005
,
2006
,
2007
,
2010
,
2011
,
Berge et al. 2008
,
2012
,
Kang et al. 2011
). However, the peduncle is not found inside the protoplasm of
A. granifera
cells. Among the algal prey tested,
A. granifera
was only able to feed on the prasinophyte
Pyramimonas
sp. (5.6 μm in ESD). In general, engulfmentfeeding dinoflagellates are able to ingest prey cells that are smaller than themselves, whereas peduncle-feeding dinoflagellates are able to feed on prey cells that are larger than themselves (
Jeong et al. 2005
,
2005
,
2010
,
Lim et al. 2014
). The small size and engulfment feeding mechanism of
A. granifera
may be responsible for its feeding on only small
Pyramimonas
sp. The heterotrophic dinoflagellate
S. algicida
is able to feed only on the raphidophyte
H. akashiwo
, while the sister species,
Stoeckeria changwonensis
is able to feed on diverse prey species (
Jeong et al. 2005
,
Lim et al. 2014
). However, the maximum growth and ingestion rates of
S. algicida
are greater than those of
S. changwonensis
. Therefore,
Lim et al. (2014)
suggested that diversification of prey items and feeding intensity may be traded during evolution. The maximum growth and ingestion rates of
A. granifera
on
Pyramimonas
sp. are comparable to or greater than those of other dinoflagellate predators (see next section). It will be worthwhile exploring the relationship between the number of prey species and feeding activity of other mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates. One or few prey species may limit the period in which these predators appear and cause large fluctuations in their abundance.
Pyramimonas
spp. sometimes causes red tides or harmful algal blooms (
Bird and Karl 1991
,
Gradinger 1996
,
Alonso-Rodriguez et al. 2000
,
Daugbjerg et al. 2000
,
Rodriguez et al. 2002
,
Kang et al. 2013
). Prior to this study,
K. armiger
was the only mixotrophic dinoflagellate known to feed on
Pyramimonas
sp. (
Berge et al. 2008
,
2008
).
A. granifera
is now one of the two mixotrophic dinoflagellates that have been reported to feed on
Pyramimonas
spp. (
Table 2
). The heterotrophic dinoflagellates
Gyrodinium dominans, Gyrodinium spirale
, and
Oblea rotunda
, and the ciliates
Laboea strobili
and
Strombidinopsis
sp. are known to feed on
Pyramimonas
spp. (
Jacobson and Anderson 1986
,
Stoecker et al. 1988
,
Putt 1991
,
Hansen 1992
,
Nakamura et al. 1995
). However, to date, positive growth rates of only
G. dominans, K. armiger
, and
A. granifera
have been reported. Therefore, during
Pyramimonas
blooms,
G. dominans, K. armiger
, and
A. granifera
may be abundant. To predict the population dynamics of
G. spirale, O. rotunda, L. strobili
, and
Strombidinopsis
spp. during
Pyramimonas
blooms, it will be worthwhile measuring the growth and ingestion rates of these predators on
Pyramimonas
spp.
- Growth and ingestion rates
The maximum growth rate of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. (1.426 d
-1
) is much greater than that of
K. armiger
feeding on
Pyramimonas orientalis
(0.45 d
-1
) (
Table 2
). The maximum ingestion rate of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. (0.973 ng C predator
-1
d
-1
) is much greater than that of
K. armiger
on
P. orientalis
(0.02 ng C predator
-1
d
-1
). The cell size of
A. granifera
(10.5 μm in ESD) is smaller than that of
K. armiger
(16.7 μm). Therefore, the much higher ingestion rate of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. and smaller cell size may be partially responsible for this greater growth rate.
Protistan grazers onPyramimonasspp.
ESD, mean equivalent spherical diameter (μm); GR, growth rate (d-1); IR, ingestion rate (ng C predator-1 d-1); NA, not available.
The ratio of the mixotrophic growth rate (1.426 d
-1
) relative to the autotrophic growth rate (0.391 d
-1
) of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. at 20℃ under a 14 : 10 h light-dark cycle of 20 μE m
-2
s
-1
, 3.7, is greater than that of any other mixotrophic dinoflagellates except
K. armiger
on
Rhodomonas baltica, Dinophysis acuminata
on
Mesodinium rubrum
, and
B. cincta
(previously
W. cincta
) on
H. akashiwo
(
Table 3
). Furthermore, the difference between autotrophic and mixotrophic growth rates of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp., which is 1.04, is greater than any other mixotrophic dinoflagellate except
P. shiwhaense
on
A. carterae
(
Table 3
). Therefore,
A. granifera
can acquire growth materials and energy through feeding much more than photosynthesis compared to other mixotrophic dinoflagellates, except a few species. Mixotrophy in
A. granifera
may be a critical strategy in increasing its population.
Optimal prey and maximum mixotrophic growth (MMGR), ingestion (MIR), and clearance rates of each mixotrophic dinoflagellate predator species
ESD, equivalent spherical diameter (m); RPP, ratio of predator to prey ESD; T, temperature (℃); LI, light intensity (℃E m-2 s-1); MMGR, maximum mixotrophic growth rate (d-1); AGR, autotrophic growth rate (d-1); RMAG, ratio of mixotrophic to autotrophic growth rates; (M-A), (MMGR-AGR); MIR, maximum ingestion rate (ng C predator-1 d-1). aIndicates the capability of feeding both peduncle and engulfment. Berge et al. (2008a) suggested that Karlodinium armiger fed on Rhodomonas baltica mainly by engulfment.
The maximum growth rate of
A. granifera
feeding on the optimal prey obtained under a 14 : 10 h light-dark cycle of 20 μE m
-2
s
-1
(1.426 d
-1
) is lower than that of
Gymnodinium smaydae
(2.23 d
-1
) (
Lee et al. 2014
), but higher than that of any other mixotrophic dinoflagellate so far reported (0.20-1.10 d
-1
) at diverse light intensities (
Table 3
). Even though
G. smaydae
has the highest mixotrophic growth rate among dinoflagellates, it cannot grow well photosynthetically. High mixotrophic and autotrophic growth rates enable
A. granifera
to slowly increase its population when the concentration of
Pyramimonas
spp. is low, but rapidly increase when that of
Pyramimonas
spp. is high.
The maximum ingestion rate of
A. granifera
feeding on
Pyramimonas
sp. (0.97 ng C predator
-1
d
-1
) is also greater than that of the mixotrophic dinoflagellates
Karlodinium veneficum, Gyrodinium galathenum, P. shiwhaense, Prorocentrum donghaiense
, which are similar in size to
A. granifera
(0.03-0.38 ng C predator
-1
d
-1
) (
Table 3
).
A. granifera
feeds on only
Pyramimonas
sp., while the other mixotrophic dinoflagellates can feed on diverse algal prey species (
Li et al. 1999
,
Jeong et al. 2005
,
Adolf et al. 2006
). Therefore,
A. granifera
may have adapted to feed on
Pyramimonas
sp. unlike other mixotrophic dinoflagellates.
When the data on maximum mixotrophic and ingestion rates of
A. granifera
and other mixotrophic dinoflagellates so far reported were analyzed, the maximum ingestion rates of all mixotrophic dinoflagellates feeding on the optimal prey species were significantly correlated with the size of the predator (p < 0.01, a linear regression ANOVA) (
Fig. 8
). Furthermore, the maximum ingestion rates of engulfment feeders are also significantly correlated with the size of the predator (p < 0.01, a linear regression ANOVA), but those of the peduncle feeders were not significantly correlated (p > 0.1). This suggests that large engulfment feeding mixotrophic dinoflagellates may ingest more prey cells than smaller ones, but peduncle feeding mixotrophic dinoflagellates may not. The maximum mixotrophic growth rates of all mixotrophic dinoflagellates feeding on the optimal prey species were not significantly correlated with the size of the predator (p > 0.1, a linear regression ANOVA). Difference in nutritional values of the optimal prey species for each predator and / or growth efficiency may have contributed to the absence of a significant correlation.
The maximum mixotrophic growth (MMGR) (A) and ingestion rates (MIR) (B) of mixotrophic dinoflagellates feeding on optimal prey species by engulfment (close circles) and peduncle (open triangles) as a function of the size (equivalent spherical diameters [ESD, ℃m]) of the predator (see Table 3). The equation of the regression was MIR (ng C predator-1 d-1) = 0.1197 × (ESD of predator) - 1.592, r2 = 0.579 for all mixotrophs (n = 18, p < 0.01); MIR (ng C predator-1 d-1) = 0.1371 × (ESD of predator) - 2.07, r2 = 0.604 for engulfment feeders (n = 16, p < 0.01). MIR of the peduncle feeders and MMGR were not significantly correlated with ESD of predators (p > 0.1). Ag, Ansanella granifera; At, Amylax triacantha; Bc, Biecheleria cincta; Cp, Cochlodinium polykrikoides; Da, Dinophysis acuminata; Fm, Fragilidium cf. mexicanum; Fs, Fragilidium subglobosum; Ga, Gymnodinium aureolum; Gg, Gyrodinium galatheanum; Gp, Gonyaulax polygramma; Ht, Heterocapsa triquetra; Ka, Karlodinium armiger; Kv, Karlodinium veneficum; Lp, Lingulodinium polyedrum; Pd, Prorocentrum donghaiense; Pm, Prorocentrum micans; Ps, Paragymnodinium shiwhaense; Sv, Symbiodinium voratum.
- Swimming speed
The average and maximum swimming speeds of
A. granifera
in the given conditions, 802 and 1,603 μm s
-1
, respectively, are greater than those of any other mixotrophic dinoflagellate. These values are greater than those of the dinoflagellate
Cochlodinium polykrikoides
, the fastest mixotrophic dinoflagellate previously reported (1,063 and 1,449 μm s
-1
, respectively). Thus,
A. granifera
appears to be the fastest mixotrophic dinoflagellate reported to date. Mixotrophic dinoflagellates can increase their populations by migrating between well-lit surface water and eutrophicated bottom water (
Eppley and Harrison 1975
,
Park et al. 2001
). Thus, the ability of fast swimming may enable
A. granifera
to reach depths deeper than those reached by other mixotrophic dinoflagellate in vertical migration. When the thermocline is located deep,
A. granifera
may have an advantage over other competitors in meeting eutrophicated bottom water.
- Grazing impact
The grazing coefficients attributable to
A. granifera
feeding on co-occurring
Pyramimonas
sp. obtained in the present study were up to 2.78 d
-1
(i.e., 93% of the population of
Pyramimonas
sp. was removed by
A. granifera
populations in 1 d). In 11 of 20 samples, the grazing coefficients attributable to
A. granifera
feeding on co-occurring
Pyramimonas
sp. exceeded 0.02 d
-1
(i.e., ≥2% of the population of
Pyramimonas
sp. was removed by
A. granifera
populations in 1 d). Therefore,
A. granifera
has the potential to sometimes have a considerable grazing impact on populations of co-occurring
Pyramimonas
sp.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Kyeong Ah Seong and Sung Yeon Lee for technical support. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korea Government/Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2010-0020702 and NRF-2012R1A2A2A01010987), Pilot project for predicting the outbreak ofCochlodiniumred tide funded by MSIP (NRF-2014M4A1H5009428), and Management of marine organisms causing ecological disturbance and harmful effect Program of Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology Promotion (KIMST) of KIMST award to HJJ.
Adolf J. E.
,
Stoecker D. K.
,
Harding L. W.
2006
The balance of autotrophy and heterotrophy during mixotrophic growth of Karlodinium micrum (Dinophyceae)
J. Plankton Res.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbl007
28
737 -
751
Alonso-Rodríguez R.
,
Páez-Osuna F.
,
Cortés-Altamirano R.
2000
Trophic conditions and stoichiometric nutrient balance in subtropical waters influenced by municipal sewage effluents in Mazatlán Bay (SE Gulf of California)
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(99)00225-8
40
331 -
339
Berge T.
,
Hansen P. J.
,
Moestrup Ø.
2008
Feeding mechanism prey specificity and growth in light and dark of the plastidic dinoflagellate Karlodinium armiger
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame01165
50
279 -
288
Berge T.
,
Hansen P. J.
,
Moestrup Ø.
2008
Prey size spectrum and bioenergetics of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Karlodinium armiger
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame01166
50
289 -
299
Bird D. F.
,
Karl D. M.
1991
Massive prasinophyte bloom in northern Gerlache Strait
Antarct. J. U. S.
26
152 -
154
Burkholder J. M.
,
Glibert P. M.
,
Skelton H. M.
2008
Mixotrophy a major mode of nutrition for harmful algal speeies in eutrophic waters
Harmful Algae
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.010
8
77 -
93
Burkholder J. M.
,
Noga E. J.
,
Hobbs C. H.
,
Glasgow H. B.
,
Smith S. A.
1992
New “phantom” dinoflagellate is the causative agent of major estuarine fish kills
Nature
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/358407a0
358
407 -
410
Daugbjerg N.
,
Marchant H. J.
,
Thomsen H. A.
2000
Life history stages of Pyramimonas tychotreta (Prasinophyceae Chlorophyta) a marine flagellate from the Ross Sea Antarctica
Phycol. Res.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1835.2000.tb00216.x
48
199 -
209
Eppley R. W.
,
Harrison W. G.
1975
Physiological ecology of Gonyaulax polyedra, a red water dinoflagellate of southern California. In Locicero, V. R. (Ed.)
Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Toxic Dinoflagellate Blooms, Massachusetts Science and Technology Foundation
11 -
22
Frost B. W.
1972
Effects of size and concentration of food particles on the feeding behavior of the marine planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus
Limnol. Oceanogr.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1972.17.6.0805
17
805 -
815
Glibert P. M.
,
Burkholder J. M.
,
Kana T. M.
,
Alexander J.
,
Skelton H.
,
Shilling C.
2009
Grazing by Karenia brevis on Synechococcus enhances its growth rate and may help to sustain blooms
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame01279
55
17 -
30
Gradinger R.
1996
Occurrence of an algal bloom under Arctic pack ice
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps131301
131
301 -
305
Hansen P. J.
1992
Prey size selection feeding rates and growth dynamics of heterotrophic dinoflagellates with special emphasis on Gyrodinium spirale
Mar. Biol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00349535
114
327 -
334
Hansen P. J.
,
Bjørnsen P. K.
,
Hansen B. W.
1997
Zooplankton grazing and growth: scaling within the 2-2,000-μm body size range
Limnol. Oceanogr.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.4.0687
42
687 -
704
Hansen P. J.
,
Nielsen T. G.
1997
Mixotrophic feeding of Fragilidium subglobosum (Dinophyceae) on three species of Ceratium: effects of prey concentration prey species and light intensity
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps147187
147
187 -
196
Heinbokel J. F.
1978
Studies on the functional role of tintinnids in the Southern California Bight I Grazing and growth rates in laboratory cultures
Mar. Biol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00395638
47
177 -
189
Horiguchi T.
,
Pienaar R. N.
1994
Gymnodinium natalense sp nov (Dinophyceae) a new tide pool dinoflagellate from South Africa
Jpn. J. Phycol.
42
21 -
28
Horiguchi T.
,
Pienaar R. N.
1994
Ultrastructure and ontogeny of a new type of eyespot in dinoflagellates
Protoplasma
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01403952
179
142 -
150
Jacobson D. M.
,
Anderson D. M.
1986
Thecate heterotrophic dinoflagellates: feeding behavior and mechanisms
J. Phycol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1986.tb00021.x
22
249 -
258
Jeong H. J.
,
Ha J. H.
,
Park J. Y.
,
Kim J. H.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Kim S.
,
Kim J. S.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Yih W. H.
2006
Distribution of the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Pfiesteria piscicida in Korean waters and its consumption of mixotrophic dinoflagellates raphidophytes and fish blood cells
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame044263
44
263 -
278
Jeong H. J.
,
Ha J. H.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Park J. Y.
,
Kim J. H.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Kim T. H.
,
Kim H. S.
,
Yih W. H.
2007
Feeding by the Pfiesteria-like heterotrophic dinoflagellate Luciella masanensis
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2007.00259.x
54
231 -
241
Jeong H. J.
,
Jang S. H.
,
Moestrup O.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Lee S. Y.
,
Potvin E.
,
Noh J. H.
2014
Ansanella granifera gen et sp nov (dinophyceae) a new dinoflagellate from the coastal waters of Korea
Algae
http://dx.doi.org/10.4490/algae.2014.29.2.075
29
75 -
99
Jeong H. J.
,
Kim J. S.
,
Kim J. H.
,
Kim S. T.
,
Seong K. A.
,
Kim T. H.
,
Song J. Y.
,
Kim S. K.
2005
Feeding and grazing impact by the newly described heterotrophic dinoflagellate Stoeckeria algicida on the harmful alga Heterosigma akashiwo
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps295069
295
69 -
78
Jeong H. J.
,
Lee K. H.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Lee K.
2011
Feeding by the newly described nematocyst-bearing heterotrophic dinoflagellate Gyrodiniellum shiwhaense
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2011.00580.x
58
511 -
524
Jeong H. J.
,
Lee S. Y.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Lim A. S.
,
Lee M. J.
,
Kim H. S.
,
Yih W.
,
Yamashita H.
,
LaJeunesse T. C.
2014
Genetics and morphology characterize the dinoflagellate Symbiodinium voratum n sp (Dinophyceae) as the sole representative of Symbiodinium clade E
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12088
61
75 -
94
Jeong H. J.
,
Park J. Y.
,
Nho J. H.
,
Park M. O.
,
Ha J. H.
,
Seong K. A.
,
Jeng C.
,
Seong C. N.
,
Lee K. Y.
,
Yih W. H.
2005
Feeding by the red-tide dinoflagellates on the cyanobacterium Synechococcus
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame041131
41
131 -
143
Jeong H. J.
,
Shim J. H.
,
Kim J. S.
,
Park J. Y.
,
Lee C. W.
,
Lee Y.
1999
Feeding by the mixotrophic thecate dinoflagellate Fragilidium cf mexicanum on red-tide and toxic dinoflagellates
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps176263
176
263 -
277
Jeong H. J.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Lim A. S.
,
Seong K. A.
,
Lee S. Y.
,
Lee M. J.
,
Lee K. H.
,
Kim H. S.
,
Shin W.
,
Nam S. W.
,
Yih W.
,
Lee K.
2012
Heterotrophic feeding as a newly identified survival strategy of the dinoflagellate Symbiodinium
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204302109
109
12604 -
12609
Jeong H. J.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Rho J. R.
,
Seong K. A.
,
Park J. W.
,
Nam G. S.
,
Yih W.
2010
Ecology of Gymnodinium aureolum I Feeding in western Korean waters
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame01394
59
239 -
255
Jeong H. J.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Kim J. S.
,
Kim T. H.
,
Kim J. H.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Yih W.
2004
Mixotrophy in the phototrophic harmful alga Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Dinophycean): prey species the effects of prey concentration and grazing impact
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00292.x
51
563 -
569
Jeong H. J.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Kim J. S.
,
Seong K. A.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Kim T. H.
2010
Growth feeding and ecological roles of the mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates in marine planktonic food webs
Ocean Sci. J.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12601-010-0007-2
45
65 -
91
Jeong H. J.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Lee K. H.
,
Kim T. H.
,
Seong K. A.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Lee S. Y.
,
Kim J. S.
,
Kim S.
,
Yih W. H.
2013
Red tides in Masan Bay Korea in 2004-2005: I Daily variations in the abundance of red-tide organisms and environmental factors
Harmful Algae
30
((Suppl. 1))
S75 -
S88
Jeong H. J.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Lim A. S.
,
Kim T. -W.
,
Lee K.
,
Kang C. K.
2013
Raphidophyte red tides in Korean waters
Harmful Algae
30
((Suppl. 1))
S41 -
S52
Jeong H. J.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Park J. Y.
,
Song J. Y.
,
Kim S. T.
,
Lee S. H.
,
Kim K. Y.
,
Yih W. H.
2005
Feeding by the phototrophic red-tide dinoflagellates: five species newly revealed and six species previously known to be mixotrophic
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame040133
40
133 -
155
Jeong H. J.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Seong K. A.
,
Kim J. H.
,
Park J. Y.
,
Kim S.
,
Lee S. H.
,
Ha J. H.
,
Yih W. H.
2005
Feeding by the mixotrophic red-tide dinoflagellate Gonyaulax polygramma: mechanisms prey species effects of prey concentration and grazing impact
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame038249
38
249 -
257
Kang N. S.
,
Jeong H. J.
,
Moestrup Ø.
,
Shin W.
,
Nam S. W.
,
Park J. Y.
,
de Salas M. F.
,
Kim K. W.
,
Noh J. H.
2010
Description of a new planktonic mixotrophic dinoflagellate Paragymnodinium shiwhaense n gen n sp from the coastal waters off western Korea: morphology pigments and ribosomal DNA gene sequence
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00462.x
57
121 -
144
Kang N. S.
,
Jeong H. J.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Yoon E. Y.
,
Lee K. H.
,
Lee K.
,
Kim G.
2011
Mixotrophy in the newly described phototrophic dinoflagellate Woloszynskia cincta from western Korean waters: feeding mechanism prey species and effect of prey concentration
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2011.00531.x
58
152 -
170
Kang N. S.
,
Lee K. H.
,
Jeong H. J.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Seong K. A.
,
Potvin É.
,
Hwang Y. J.
,
Yoon E. Y.
2013
Red tides in Shiwha Bay western Korea: a huge dike and tidal power plant established in a semi-enclosed embayment system
Harmful Algae
30
((Suppl. 1))
S114 -
S130
Kim S.
,
Kang Y. G.
,
Kim H. S.
,
Yih W.
,
Coats D. W.
,
Park M. G.
2008
Growth and grazing responses of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata as functions of light intensity and prey concentration
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame01203
51
301 -
310
Kremp A.
,
Elbrächter M.
,
Schweikert M.
,
Wolny J. L.
,
Gottschling M.
2005
Woloszynskia halophila (Biecheler) comb nov: a bloom-forming cold-water dinoflagellate co-occurring with Scrippsiella hangoei (Dinophyceae) in the Baltic Sea
J. Phycol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.00070.x
41
629 -
642
Lee K. H.
,
Jeong H. J.
,
Jang T. Y.
,
Lim A. S.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Kim J. H.
,
Kim K. Y.
,
Park K.
,
Lee K.
2014
Feeding by the newly described mixotrophic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium smaydae: feeding mechanism prey species and effect of prey concentration
J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2014.05.011
459
114 -
125
Li A.
,
Stoecker D. K.
,
Adolf J. E.
1999
Feeding pigmentation photosynthesis and growth of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Gyrodinium galatheanum
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame019163
19
163 -
176
Lim A. S.
,
Jeong H. J.
,
Jang T. Y.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Yoon E. Y.
,
Kim G. H.
2014
Feeding by the newly described heterotrophic dinoflagellate Stoeckeria changwonensis: a comparison with other species in the family Pfiesteriaceae
Harmful Algae
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2014.04.001
36
11 -
21
Luo Z.
,
Yang W.
,
Xu B.
,
Gu H.
2013
First record of Biecheleria cincta (Dinophyceae) from Chinese coasts with morphological and molecular characterization of the strains
Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00343-013-2315-8
31
835 -
845
Moestrup Ø.
,
Hansen G.
,
Daugbjerg N.
2008
Studies on woloszynskioid dinoflagellates III: on the ultrastructure and phylogeny of Borghiella dodgei gen et sp nov a cold-water species from Lake Tovel N Italy and on B tenuissima comb nov (syn Woloszynskia tenuissima)
Phycologia
http://dx.doi.org/10.2216/07-32.1
47
54 -
78
Moestrup Ø.
,
Lindberg K.
,
Daugbjerg N.
2009
Studies on woloszynskioid dinoflagellates IV: The genus Biecheleria gen nov
Phycol. Res.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1835.2009.00540.x
57
203 -
220
Moestrup Ø.
,
Lindberg K.
,
Daugbjerg N.
2009
Studies on woloszynskioid dinoflagellates V Ultrastructure of Biecheleriopsis gen nov with description of Biecheleriopsis adriatica sp nov
Phycol. Res.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1835.2009.00541.x
57
221 -
237
Montresor M.
,
Procaccini G.
,
Stoecker D. K.
1999
Polarella glacialis gen nov sp nov (Dinophyceae): Suessiaceae are still alive!
J. Phycol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3510186.x
35
186 -
197
Nakamura Y.
,
Suzuki S.
,
Hiromi J.
1995
Growth and grazing of a naked heterotrophic dinoflagellate Gyrodinium dominans
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame009157
9
157 -
164
Park J. G.
,
Jeong M. K.
,
Lee J. A.
,
Cho K. J.
,
Kwon O. S.
2001
Diurnal vertical migration of a harmful dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Dinophyceae) during a red tide in coastal waters of Namhae Island Korea
Phycologia
http://dx.doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-40-3-292.1
40
292 -
297
Park J.
,
Jeong H. J.
,
Yoo Y. D.
,
Yoon E. Y.
2013
Mixotrophic dinoflagellate red tides in Korean waters: distribution and ecophysiology
Harmful Algae
30
((Suppl. 1))
S28 -
S40
Park M. G.
,
Kim M.
,
Kang M.
2013
A dinoflagellate Amylax triacantha with plastids of the cryptophyte origin: phylogeny feeding mechanism and growth and grazing responses
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12041
60
363 -
376
Park M. G.
,
Kim S.
,
Kim H. S.
,
Myung G.
,
Kang Y. G.
,
Yih W.
2006
First successful culture of the marine dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame045101
45
101 -
106
Putt M.
1991
Development and evaluation of tracer particles for use in microzooplankton herbivory studies
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps077027
77
27 -
37
Rodriguez F.
,
Varela M.
,
Zapata M.
2002
Phytoplankton assemblages in the Gerlache and Bransfield Straits (Antarctic Peninsula) determined by light microscopy and CHEMTAX analysis of HPLC pigment data
Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00121-7
49
723 -
747
Seong K. A.
,
Jeong H. J.
,
Kim S.
,
Kim G. H.
,
Kang J. H.
2006
Bacterivory by co-occurring red-tide algae, heterotrophic nanoflagellates, and ciliates
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps322085
322
85 -
97
Sherr B. F.
,
Sherr E. B.
,
Fallon R. D.
1987
Use of monodispersed, fluorescently labeled bacteria to estimate in situ protozoan bacterivory
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
53
958 -
965
Siano R.
,
Kooistra W. H. C. F.
,
Montresor M.
,
Zingone A.
2009
Unarmoured and thin-walled dinoflagellates from the Gulf of Naples with the description of Woloszynskia cincta sp nov (Dinophyceae Suessiales)
Phycologia
http://dx.doi.org/10.2216/08-61.1
48
44 -
65
Siano R.
,
Montresor M.
,
Probert I.
,
Not F.
,
de Vargas C.
2010
Pelagodinium gen nov and P beii comb nov a dinoflagellate symbiont of planktonic foraminifera
Protist
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2010.01.002
161
385 -
399
Smayda T. J.
1997
Harmful algal blooms: their ecophysiology and general relevance to phytoplankton blooms in the sea
Limnol. Oceanogr.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.5_part_2.1137
42
1137 -
1153
Spurr A. R.
1969
A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy
J. Ultrastruct. Res.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5320(69)90033-1
26
31 -
43
Stoecker D. K.
1999
Mixotrophy among dinoflagellates
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04619.x
46
397 -
401
Stoecker D. K.
,
Li A.
,
Coats D. W.
,
Gustafson D. E.
,
Nannen M. K.
1997
Mixotrophy in the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps152001
152
1 -
12
Stoecker D. K.
,
Silver M. W.
,
Michaels A. E.
,
Davis L. H.
1988
Obligate mixotrophy in Laboea strobila a ciliate which retains chloroplasts
Mar. Biol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02112135
99
415 -
423
Takahashi K.
,
Sarai C.
,
Iwataki M.
2014
Morphology of two marine woloszynskioid dinoflagellates Biecheleria brevisulcata sp nov and Biecheleriopsis adriatica (Suessiaceae Dinophyceae) from Japanese coasts
Phycologia
http://dx.doi.org/10.2216/13-192.1
53
52 -
65
Turner J. T.
2006
Harmful algae interactions with marine planktonic grazers. In Granéli, E. & Turner, J. T. (Eds.) Ecology of Harmful Algae
Springer-Verlag
Berlin
259 -
270
Yoo Y. D.
,
Jeong H. J.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Song J. Y.
,
Kim K. Y.
,
Lee G.
,
Kim J.
2010
Feeding by the newly described mixotrophic dinoflagellate Paragymnodinium shiwhaense: feeding mechanism, prey species, and effect of prey concentration
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00448.x
57
145 -
158
Yoo Y. D.
,
Jeong H. J.
,
Kim M. S.
,
Kang N. S.
,
Song J. Y.
,
Shin W.
,
Kim K. Y.
,
Lee K.
2009
Feeding by phototrophic red-tide dinoflagellates on the ubiquitous marine diatom Skeletonema costatum
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00421.x
56
413 -
420