<italic>Neosiphonia ramirezii</italic> sp. nov. (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) from Peru
Neosiphonia ramirezii sp. nov. (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) from Peru
ALGAE. 2013. Mar, 28(1): 73-82
Copyright ©2013, The Korean Society of Phycology
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Received : January 01, 2013
  • Accepted : February 02, 2013
  • Published : March 15, 2013
Export by style
Cited by
About the Authors
Danilo Edson Bustamante
Department of Marine Life Science, Chosun University, Gwangju 501-759, Korea
Boo Yeon Won
Department of Marine Life Science, Chosun University, Gwangju 501-759, Korea
Tae Oh Cho
Department of Marine Life Science, Chosun University, Gwangju 501-759, Korea
The genus Neosiphonia Kim and Lee 1999 contains approximately 30 species worldwide. Unidentified samples from Peru are here described as a new species, Neosiphonia ramirezii sp. nov., on the basis of morphological and molecular data. N. ramirezii sp. nov. is characterized by the presence of a limited prostrate system, well-developed erect filaments, rhizoids cut off from pericentral cells by cross walls, four pericentral cells that are completely ecorticate, scarce trichoblasts, inconspicuous scar cells, procarps with three-celled carpogonial branches, spermatangial branches developed from basal cells of forked trichoblasts, and spirally arranged tetrasporangia. Our new species is distinct from N. flaccidissima (Hollenberg) Kim et Lee, N. sphaerocarpa (Børgesen) Kim et Lee, and N. savatieri (Hariot) Kim et Lee from the Pacific temperate coast of South America and from 14 Neosiphonia species reported worldwide by having limited prostrate filaments attached by numerous rhizoids, dichotomous (“Y” shaped) branches in the main axes, and scarce trichoblasts. Phylogenetic rbc L analyses confirm the placement of the new taxon as a distinct species in the genus Neosiphonia .
The segregation of the genus Neosiphonia Kim et Lee from the large genus Polysiphonia Greville was based on Neosiphonia flavimarina Kim et Lee from Korea (Kim and Lee 1999, Kim 2005). Neosiphonia is characterized by having lateral branch initials and trichoblasts produced on successive segments, rhizoids cut off from pericentral cells by a cross wall, procarps bearing a three-celled carpogonial branch, spermatangial branches arising as a furcation of the trichoblasts, and spirally arranged tetrasporangia (Kim and Lee 1999, Kim 2003).
Recently, new combinations were made for Neosiphonia upolensis (Grunow) Kim et Boo from Malaysia (Kim et al. 2008), N. bajacali (Hollenberg) Mamoozadeh et Freshwater from Caribbean Mexico and N. echinata (Harvey) Mamoozadeh et Freshwater from Florida, USA (Mamoozadeh and Freshwater 2011), and N. sertularioides (Grateloup) Nam et Kang from Geojedo, Korea (Nam and Kang 2012). In the most recent study, Bustamante et al. (2012) reported a new species, N. peruviensis Bustamante, Won, Ramírez et T. O. Cho from Pisco, Ica, Peru.
Four Neosiphonia species are currently recognized from the Pacific temperate coast of South America: N. flaccidissima (Hollenberg) Kim et Lee; N. peruviensis Bustamante, Won, Ramírez et Cho; N. savatieri (Hariot) Kim et Lee; and N. sphaerocarpa (Børgesen) Kim et Lee (Howe 1914, Dawson et al. 1964, Ramírez and Santelices 1991, Bustamante et al. 2012). These species are characterized by rhizoids cutting off pericentral cells by a cross wall, ecorticate axes, and spirally arranged tetrasporangia.
We collected unidentified samples from Peru in 2008 and 2012 which we here describe as new species, Neo-siphonia ramirezii sp. nov., on the basis of their morphology. We also provide evidence of their phylogenetic relationship with other similar species, using comparative rbc L sequence analyses.
- Morphology
Samples were collected at Lagunillas, Pisco, Peru on August 2008 and July 2012, preserved in 4-5% formalin / seawater for the morphological study and dried in silica gel for the molecular study. Microscope observations were made on material stained with 1% aqueous aniline blue acidified with 0.1% diluted HCl. Photomicrographs were taken on an Olympus microscope (BX51TRF; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with an Olympus DP71 camera. A total of 25 individuals from 5 tufts were selected for measuring quantitative characters. Voucher specimens were deposited in the herbarium of Chosun University Korea (CUK).
- Molecular study
Genomic DNA was extracted from silica gel-dried samples using the G-spin Iip genomic DNA extraction kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Inc., Seongnam, Korea). The rbc L gene was amplified using the primer combinations F7-R753 and F645-Rrbcst, as listed in Lin et al. (2001), and was sequenced with the primers F7, F645, F993, R376, R753, R1150, and RrbcStart (Freshwater and Rueness 1994, Lin et al. 2001, Gavio and Fredericq 2002). PCR and sequencing protocols were as described in Cho et al. (2003). Sequences were determined for both forward and reverse strands using an ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). New rbc L sequences were obtained from N. ramirezii and have been deposited in EMBL / GenBank under the accession numbers KC493351 and KC493352. All rbc L sequence data were compiled and the sequences aligned in the Genetic Data Environment (GDE 2.2) program (Smith et al. 1994). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using MEGA version 5 (Tamura et al. 2011). Support for nodes in the maximum parsimony tree was determined by calculating 500 bootstrap proportion replicates (Felsenstein 1985). For maximum likelihood, we performed a likelihood ratio test using Modeltest 3.06 (Posada and Crandall 1998) to determine the best available model for the rbc L data. Maximum likelihood analyses were conducted using the GTR + I + G model, with 500 bootstrap replicates.
- Neosiphonia ramirezii D. E. Bustamante, B. Y. Won et T. O. Cho sp. nov.
Diagnosis. Plants 2.4-5 cm high, saxicolous, consisting of limited prostrate and well-developed erect systems; branches dichotomous, attached by abundant unicellular rhizoids. Pericentral cells four, ecorticated along the entire thallus. Trichoblasts scarce, simple or forked once. Rhizoids cut off from pericentral cells by cross walls along the thallus. Procarps with three-celled carpogonial branches. Spermatangial branches arising from basal cells of forked trichoblasts. Tetrasporangia tetrahedral, spirally arranged.
Holotype. Lagunillas, Pisco, Ica, Peru, collected by T. O. Cho, Aug 21, 2008, CUK 6511 ( Fig. 1 A).
Other specimens examined. Lagunillas, Pisco, Ica, Peru, collected by T. O. Cho, Aug 21, 2008, CUK 6520; Lagunillas, Pisco, Ica, Peru, collected by T. O. Cho and D. E. Bustamante, Jul 5, 2012, CUK 8360.
Etymology of specific epithet. The new species honors María Eliana Ramírez for her pioneering and valuable contributions to the understanding of marine algae from the Pacific temperate coast of South America.
Description. Plants grow in the intertidal zone on rocks in association with other filamentous species. Thalli are 2.4 to 5 cm high ( Fig. 1 A), red-brown in color and occur in dense tufts ( Fig. 1 B) consisting of a limited prostrate system and well-developed erect filaments. Erect axes are 95.3 ± 9.8 μm in diameter ( Fig. 1 B) and arise endogenously from prostrate axes ( Fig. 1 C). Apices have a prominent apical cell, 8.2 ± 1.4 μm × 6.9 ± 1 μm in size ( Fig. 1 D). Trichoblasts are 22.7 ± 8.2 μm in length, deciduous, delicate, and scarce, produced from each segment near the apex, and once or twice forked ( Fig. 1 E). Inconspicuous scar cells are 11.8 ± 3.9 μm × 11.9 ± 3.9 μm, visible on the surface after shedding of trichoblasts ( Fig. 1 F). Adventitious branchlets arise on basal and older segments of the main axes as well as on its dichotomies. Four pericentral cells remain completely ecorticated throughout the thallus ( Fig. 1 G & H). Segments of erect branches measure 136.4 ± 43.6 μm in length and are 0.7 broader than long (1.4 ± 0.4 in length/breadth). Prostrate axes are 168.5 ± 11.1 μm in diameter and are attached on the surface of rocky substrata by numerous unicellular rhizoids located in the proximal and distal parts of the pericentral cells. Segments of prostrate axes are 279.4 ± 24.8 μm in length and 0.6 broader than long (1.7 ± 0.2 in length/breadth). Branching pattern is dichotomous in the main axes ( Fig. 1 B)
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Vegetative structures of Neosiphonia ramirezii sp. nov. (A) Holotype specimen from Lagunillas, Pisco, Peru, CUK 6511. (B) Habit of vegetative plant showing dichotomous branching pattern and pseudofastigiate appearance, CUK 6511. (C) Axial filament (arrow) endogenously developed from main axial cells (ax), CUK 6511. (D) Apical region of thallus showing a prominent apical cell with transverse division (arrow) of subapical cell, CUK 8360. (E) Apical region with trichoblasts (tb), CUK 8360. (F) Middle part of thallus with scar cells (sc), CUK 6511. (G & H) Cross section views of upper (G) and basal (H) parts of thallus (ax, axial cell; p, pericentral cell), CUK 8360. (I) Rhizoid (r) cut off from pericentral cell (p) by a wall (arrow), CUK 6511. (J) Unicellular rhizoid with digitate tips, CUK 8630. Scale bars represent: A, 1 cm; B, 5 mm; C & E, 20 μm; D, 5 μm; F-J, 50 μm.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Reproductive structures of Neosiphonia ramirezii sp. nov. (A) Female gametophyte bearing cystocarps, CUK 8630. (B) Apical part of thallus with cystocarps (arrows) at various stages of development, CUK 8630. (C & D) Young (C) and mature procarp (D) with a three-celled carpogonial branch and trichogyne (tr), CUK 8630. ax, axial cell; cb1-cb2, sequence of carpogonial branch cells; cp, carpogonium; p, pericentral cell; su, supporting cell. (E) Male gametophyte, CUK 8630. (F) Apex showing spermatangial branch (arrow) developed on the basal cell of trichoblast (tb), CUK 8630. (G) Tetrasporangial plant, CUK 6511. (H & I) Cross section view of fertile segment (H) showing 5 pericentral cells, and mature stage (I) showing one tetrasporangium (t) surrounded by cover cells (arrows), CUK 6511. (J) Upper part of tetrasporangial thallus showing interrupted and spiral series of mature tetrasporangia (t), CUK 6511. Scale bars represent: A, 200 μm; B, F, H & I, 50 μm; C & D, 10 μm; E & G, 5 mm; J, 100 μm.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Phylogenetic tree based on rbcL sequences inferred from maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis using the general time reversible model (GTR model) + invariable sites (I) + Gamma distribution (G). Bootstrap proportion values (>50%) for ML (500 replicates, upper) and maximum parsimony (MP) (500 replicates, lower) are shown at the nodes.
In female plants ( Fig. 2 A), cystocarps are narrowly globose, ovate, 152 ± 50 μm × 175 ± 57 μm in size, scattered on branchlets ( Fig. 2 B), and produced on short pedicels. Procarps consist of three-celled carpogonial branches ( Fig. 2 C & D). In male plants ( Fig. 2 E), spermatangial branches each arise from the basal cell of a forked trichoblast ( Fig. 2 F). In tetrasporangial plants ( Fig. 2 G), the fertile segments comprise 5 pericentral cells ( Fig. 2 H). Tetrasporangia are tetrahedral, swollen, distorted, and 59.8 ± 13 μm × 87.8 ± 18.4 μm in size. A single tetrasporangium is produced per single segment ( Fig. 2 I). Tetrasporangia are spirally arranged ( Fig. 2 J) with successively maturing sporangia.
Phylogenetic analyses. The 1,244-bp portion of the 1,467-bp rbc L gene (84.8% sequenced) was analyzed, includes 347 parsimony informative sites. The phylogenetic trees were obtained from the alignment of the rbc L sequences which were newly generated and downloaded from GenBank. Herposiphonia sp. and Lophosiphonia sp. were selected as an outgroup taxa. Phylogenetic analyses reveal a strongly supported clade of predominantely Neosiphonia species in the rbc L maximum likelihood phylogeny ( Fig. 3 ), with N. ramirezii located within this strongly supported clade, sister to N. peruviensis . The rbc L sequence divergence (%) for N. ramirezii specimens differed from N. peruviensis by 2.4%, from “ Polysiphonia strictissima ” by 5.2%, from N. yendoi by 7.0%, from N. flavimarina by 6.3 %, and from N. harveyi by 6.2% sequence divergence.
Neosiphonia ramirezii sp. nov. is newly described from Peru based on morphological and molecular evidence. It is recognized by the presence of erect filaments arising from limited prostrate filaments, numerous rhizoids cut off from irregular positions of pericentral cells by a cross wall, 4 pericentral cells throughout, ecorticate axes, scarce trichoblasts, inconspicuous scar cells, procarps with three-celled carpogonial branches, spermatangia arising from the basal cell of trichoblasts, and a spiral arrangement of tetrasporangia. RbcL molecular analysis corroborates the taxonomic placement of N. ramirezii in Neosiphonia .
Four Neosiphonia species have been reported from the Pacific temperate coast of South America: N. flaccidissima, N. peruviensis, N. savatieri , and N. sphaerocarpa . Although these Neosiphonia species co-occur with our new species in the Pacific temperate coast of South America, they are morphologically distinct from N. ramirezii sp. nov. N. flaccidissima reported from Lima, Peru, is distinguished by having branches arising in connection with trichoblasts, indistinct main axes, and abundant trichoblasts (Hollenberg 1942, 1968, Dawson et al. 1964). N. peruviensis described from Ica, Peru, has 6 pericentral cells and 1 or 2 tetrasporangia per segment (Bustamante et al. 2012). N. savatieri reported from Isla de Pascua, has a rhizoidal cluster and abundant trichoblasts (Hariot 1891, Santelices and Abbott 1987, Kim 2005). N. sphaerocarpa , reported from Lima and Talara, Peru, is distinguished by having creeping prostrate filaments and abundant trichoblasts with 3-4 dichotomies (Børgesen 1918, Dawson et al. 1964, Hollenberg 1968, Hollenberg and Norris 1977, Guimarães et al. 2004, Mamoozadeh and Freshwater 2011).
N. ramirezii sp. nov. resembles the other 14 worldwide Neosiphonia species (Harvey 1853, Kützing 1863, Hollenberg 1942, 1961, 1968, Kapraun 1977, Maggs and Hommersand 1993, Womersley 2003, Guiry and Guiry 2013) by having 4 pericentral cells, ecorticate axes, exogenous lateral branches, procarps with three-celled carpogonial branches, spermatangia developed from the basal cell of a forked trichoblast, and spirally arranged tetrasporangia ( Table 1 ). However, the species (symbol a) labeled in Table 1 are distinguished from N. ramirezii by the presence of a discoidal base or rhizoidal cluster (Harvey 1853, Segi 1951, Hollenberg 1968, Kapraun 1979, Yoon 1986, Kim and Lee 1999, Guimarães et al. 2004, Kim and Abbott 2006, Kim et al. 2008, Mamoozadeh and Freshwater 2012). Furthermore, the species (symbol b) labeled in Table 1 are distinct from N. ramirezii by having creeping filaments or extended prostrate filaments (Agardh 1863, Hollenberg 1942, 1968, Segi 1951, Kim and Lee 1996, 1999, Abbott et al. 2002, Womersley 2003, Kim and Abbott 2006, Kim et al. 2008, Lee 2008, Creed et al. 2010, Nam and Kang 2012). The remaining species in Table 1 , N. apiculata (Hollenberg) Masuda et Kogame, is characterized by abruptly tapered apices and pseudodichotomous branches (Hollenberg 1968, Tani et al. 2005, Kim and Abbott 2006).
Our molecular phylogenetic analyses using rbc L sequences revealed sequence divergence between N. ramirezii sp. nov. and other previously reported Neosiphonia species, sufficient to classify our new species among Neosiphonia. Neosiphonia ramirezii is nested in a monophyletic, well-supported clade.
Morphological comparisons of species similar in appearance to Neosiphonia ramireziiaSpecies having discoidal base or rhizoidal cluster.bSpecies having creeping filaments or extended prostrate filaments.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Morphological comparisons of species similar in appearance to Neosiphonia ramirezii aSpecies having discoidal base or rhizoidal cluster. bSpecies having creeping filaments or extended prostrate filaments.
This research was supported by Basic Science ResearchProgram through a grant from Marine BiotechnologyProgram Funded by Ministry of Land, Transportand Maritime Affairs of the Korean Government and theNational Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded bythe Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010-0003405) to Tae Oh Cho.
Abbott I. A. , Fisher J. , McDermid K. J. 2002 Newly reportedand revised marine algae from the vicinity ofNha Trang, Vietnam. In Abbott, I. A. (Ed.) Taxonomy ofEconomic Seaweeds. Vol. 8. California Sea Grant College Program La Jolla, CA 291 - 321
Agardh J. G. 1863 Species genera et ordines algarum. Vol. 2,Part 3. C. W. K. Gleerup Lund 787 - 1291
Børgesen F. 1918 The marine algae of the Danish West Indies.Part 3. Rhodophyceae (4). Dansk Bot. Arkiv 3 241 - 304
Bustamante D. E. , Won B. Y. , Ramírez M. E. , Cho T. O. 2012 Neosiphonia peruviensis sp. nov. (Rhodomelaceae,Rhodophyta) from the Pacific coast of South America. Bot. Mar. 55 359 - 366
Cho T. O. , Fredericq S. , Boo S. M. 2003 Ceramium inkyuiisp. nov. (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta) from Korea: a newspecies based on morphological and molecular evidence. J. Phycol. 39 236 - 247
Creed M. F. , Fujii M. T. , Barreto M. B. B. , Guimarães S. M.P. B. , Cassano V. , Pereira S. M. B. , Carvalho M. F. O. , Khader S. 2010 Rhodophyceae. In Forzza, R. C. (Ed.)Catálogo de Plantas e Fungos do Brasil. Vol. 1. Jardim Botanico do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro 416 - 436
Dawson E. Y. , Acleto C. , Foldvik N. 1964 The seaweeds ofPeru. Nova Hedwigia 13 65 - 66
Felsenstein J. 1985 Confidence limits on phylogenies: anapproach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39 783 - 791
Freshwater D. W. , Rueness J. 1994 Phylogenetic relationshipsof some European Gelidium (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta)species, based on rbcL nucleotide sequenceanalysis. Phycologia 33 187 - 194
Gavio B. , Fredericq S. 2002 Grateloupia turuturu (Halimeniaceae,Rhodophyta) is the correct name of the nonnativespecies in the Atlantic known as Grateloupia doryphora. Eur. J. Phycol. 37 349 - 359
Guimarães S. M. P. B. , Fujii M. T. , Pupo D. , Yokoya N. S. 2004 An assessment of the morphological characteristicsand its taxonomical implication in the genus Polysiphoniasensu lato (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from thelittoral of São Paulo and Espírito Santo States, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Bot. 27 163 - 183
Guiry M. D. , Guiry G. M. 2013 AlgaeBase. World-wideelectronic publication, National University of Ireland,Galway. Available from:
Hariot P. 1891 Liste des algues marines rapportées de Yokoska(Japon) par M. le Dr. Savatier. Mem. Soc. Nat. Sci. Natur. Math. Cherbourg 27 211 - 230
Harvey W. H. 1853 Nereis Boreali-Americana, Part II. Rhodospermeae. Smithson. Contrib. Knowl. 5 1 - 258
Hollenberg G. J. 1942 An account of the species of Polysiphoniaon the Pacific coast of North America. I. Oligosiphonia. Am. J. Bot. 29 772 - 785
Hollenberg G. J. 1961 Marine red algae of Pacific Mexico.Part 5. The genus Polysiphonia. Pac. Nat. 2 345 - 375
Hollenberg G. J. 1968 An account of the species of Polysiphoniaof the central and western tropical Pacific OceanI. Oligosiphonia.Pac. Sci. 22 56 - 98
Hollenberg G. J. , Norris J. N. 1977 The red alga Polysiphonia(Rhodomelaceae) in the northern Gulf of California. Smithson. Contrib. Mar. Sci. 1 1 - 22
Howe M. A. 1914 The marine algae of Peru. Mem. Torrey Bot. Club 15 1 - 185
Kapraun D. F. 1977 The genus Polysiphonia in North Carolina,USA. Bot. Mar. 20 313 - 331
Kapraun D. F. 1979 The genus Polysiphonia (Rhodophyta,Ceramiales) in the vicinity of Port Aransas, Texas. Contrib. Mar. Sci. 22 105 - 120
Kim M. S. 2003 Taxonomic reassessment of the genus Polysiphonia(Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta): morphologyand reproduction of Neosiphonia decumbens and N.harlandii. Algae 18 107 - 119
Kim M. S. 2005 Taxonomy of a poorly documented alga, Neosiphoniasavatieri (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) fromKorea. Nova Hedwigia 81 163 - 175
Kim M. S. , Abbott I. A. 2006 Taxonomic notes on HawaiianPolysiphonia, with transfer to Neosiphonia (Rhodomelaceae,Rhodophyta). Phycol. Res. 54 32 - 39
Kim M. S. , Lee I. K. 1996 Two species of Polysiphonia, P.scopulorum Harvey and P. flaccidissima Hollenberg(Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) new to Korea. Algae 11 141 - 148
Kim M. S. , Lee I. K. 1999 Neosiphonia flavimarina sp. nov. with a taxonomic reassessment of the genusPolysiphonia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Phycol.Res. 47 271 - 281
Kim M. S. , Lim P. E. , Phang S. M. 2008 Taxonomic notes onMalaysian Neosiphonia and Polysiphonia (Rhodomelaceae,Rhodophyta). In Phang, S. -M., Lewmanomont,K. & Lim, P. -E. (Eds.) Taxonomy of Southeast Asian Seaweeds.Monograph Series. Vol. 2. Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur 33 - 44
Kützing F. T. 1863 Tabulae phycologicae. Vol. 13. Gedruckt auf kosten des Verfassers Nordhausen 1 - 31
Lee Y. 2008 Marine algae of Jeju. Academy Publication Seoul 477 -
Lin S. -M. , Fredericq S. , Hommersand M. H. 2001 Systematicsof the Delesseriaceae (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta)based on large subunit rDNA and rbcL sequences,including the Phycodryoideae, subfam. nov. J. Phycol. 37 881 - 899
Maggs C. A. , Hommersand M. H. 1993 Seaweeds of theBritish Isles. Vol. 1. Rhodophyta, Part 3A. Ceramiales. HerMajesty’s Stationary Office Natural History Museum London 444 -
Mamoozadeh N. R. , Freshwater D. W. 2011 Taxonomicnotes on Caribbean Neosiphonia and Polysiphonia (Ceramiales,Florideophyceae): five species from Florida,USA and Mexico. Bot. Mar. 54 269 - 292
Mamoozadeh N. R. , Freshwater D. W. 2012 Polysiphoniasensu lato (Ceramiales, Florideophyceae) species of CaribbeanPanama including Polysiphonia lobophoralissp. nov. and Polysiphonia nuda sp. nov. Bot. Mar. 55 317 - 347
Nam K. W. , Kang P. J. 2012 Algal flora of Korea. Vol. 4, No. 4. Rhodophyta: Ceramiales: Rhodomelaceae: 18 genera includingHerposiphonia. National Institute of Biological Resources Incheon 178 -
Posada D. , Crandall K. A. 1998 Modeltest: testing themodel of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 817 - 818
Ramírez M. E. , Santelices B. 1991 Catálogo de las algasmarinas bentónicas de la costa temperada del Pacífico deSudamérica. Monogr. Biol. 5 1 - 437
Santelices B. , Abbott I. A. 1987 Geographic and marineisolation: an assessment of the marine algae of EasterIsland. Pac. Sci. 41 1 - 20
Segi T. 1951 Systematic study of the genus Polysiphoniafrom Japan and its vicinity. Rep. Fac. Fish. Pref. Univ. Mie 1 167 - 272
Smith S. W. , Overbeek R. , Woese C. R. , Gilbert W. , Gillevet P. M. 1994 The genetic data environment an expandableGUI for multiple sequence analysis. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10 671 - 675
Tamura K. , Peterson D. , Peter N , Stecher G , Nei M. , Kumar S. 2011 MEGA5: molecular evolutionary geneticsanalysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionarydistance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28 2731 - 2739
Tani M. , Yamagishi Y. , Masuda M. , Kogame K. , Kawaguchi S. , Phang S. M. 2005 Taxonomic notes on marine algaefrom Malaysia. IX. Four species of Rhodophyceae,with the description of Chondria decidua sp. nov. Bot. Mar. 46 24 - 35
Womersley H. B. S. 2003 The marine benthic flora of SouthernAustralia. Rhodophyta. Part IIID, Ceramiales. Delesseriaceae,Sarcomeniaceae, Rhodomelaceae. Australian Biological Resources Study Canberra 533 -
Yoon H. Y. 1986 A taxonomic study of genus Polysiphonia(Rhodophyta) from Korea. Korean J. Phycol. 1 3 - 86