Advanced
A taxonomic and distributional study of the rhodolith-forming species <italic>Lithothamnion muelleri</italic> (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) in the Eastern Pacific Ocean
A taxonomic and distributional study of the rhodolith-forming species Lithothamnion muelleri (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) in the Eastern Pacific Ocean
ALGAE. 2013. Mar, 28(1): 63-71
Copyright ©2013, The Korean Society of Phycology
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Received : October 10, 2012
  • Accepted : February 02, 2013
  • Published : March 15, 2013
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Share
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Néstor M. Robinson
Programa de Investigación en Botánica Marina, Departamento de Biología Marina, UABCS, Apartado postal 19-B, La Paz, B.C.S. 23080, México
robinson.biol@gmail.com
G. I. Hansen
Oregon State University at WED/PCEB, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2111 SE Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR 97365-5260, USA
C. Fernández-García
Escuela de Biología, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (CIMAR), Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, San José, 11501-2060, Costa Rica
R. Riosmena-Rodríguez
Programa de Investigación en Botánica Marina, Departamento de Biología Marina, UABCS, Apartado postal 19-B, La Paz, B.C.S. 23080, México
Abstract
Lithothamnion muelleri is reported for the first time as one of the main components of rhodolith beds along the Eastern Pacific Ocean based on samples from Washington State (USA), Pacific Baja California (México), southern Nicaragua, and Costa Rica. Individual rhodoliths ranged from fruticose to lumpy in morphology, and bi-sporangial, tetrasporangial, and gametangial plants were similar to those described from Australia and Brazil. Our study revealed a surprisingly wide latitudinal distribution of this species along the American continent. Its documentation in the Eastern Pacific will facilitate a more accurate interpretation of the ecology, biology, and biogeography of rhodolith beds worldwide.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Rhodoliths beds are widely distributed around the world (reviewed by Foster 2001). Recently, the species composition of these beds has been studied in the Gulf of California (Steller et al. 2009, Riosmena-Rodríguez et al. 2010), the northeastern Atlantic in Spain (Peña and Bárbara 2010), the southwestern Atlantic in Brazil (Amado- Filho et al. 2007, 2010, Figueiredo et al. 2007, Villas-Boas et al. 2009, Henriques et al. 2012), and southern Australia (Harvey and Bird 2008). These accounts are part of an increasing interest in the taxonomy, distribution, and ecology of this poorly known habitat.
In the Eastern Pacific Ocean, rhodolith beds are known from the Galapagos Islands, Costa Rica, and Panama and from the Gulf of California to Alaska (Lemoine 1929, Dawson 1960, Konar et al. 2006, Fernández 2008, Littler and Littler 2008, Riosmena-Rodríguez et al. 2010). However, characterization of the species forming these beds is still incomplete. Recently, a number of rhodolith collections from these sites became available for taxonomic study. Amazingly, most of them appeared to be a single widespread species ( Fig. 1 ) with wide ecological tolerances. This species, occured in both intertidal and subtidal zones, at depths of up to 85 m, and was found growing on small stones, large rocks, and reef tops as well as on other algae (Wilks and Woelkerling 1995, p. 556, Womersley 1996, p. 183). In order to confirm that these collec-tions were truly a single species, we carried out a detailed morphological and anatomical study of the material from throughout its geographic range in the Eastern Pacific Ocean.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Collections used for the study came from seven sites in the Eastern Pacific Ocean ( Table 1 ). Specimens were collected by snorkeling at depths of 1-4 m and by SCUBA diving at depths of 5-16 m. Anatomical measurements and reproductive features were determined for specimens from each collection, including a total of 71 rhodolith individuals and all possible morphological variants. Terminology for the growth forms of coralline algal thalli follows Woelkerling et al. (1993), and anatomical terminology follows Woelkerling (1988). Permanent slides for optical microscopy were prepared using the methodology described by Riosmena-Rodríguez et al. (1999). Specimens for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were air-dried, fractured under the stereoscope, placed on aluminum stubs and then gold-coated for observation under the SEM (S-2600N; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), at 20 kV at the Ryan Institute, National University of Galway, Ireland.
The following collections were examined: GIH 5800, One Mile Reef, San Juan Island, San Juan County, Washington, USA, 11 m depth, April 20, 1983, collector (col.) S. Norton and G. Hansen, determiner (det.) R. Riosmena; CFNI-582 and CFNI-643, La Peña Rota and Guacalito, Nicaragua, 11 and 5.5 m depth respectively, July 3, 2009, col. C. Fernández-García, det. N. M. Robinson; GGMX-1023c, GGMX-1023d, GGMX-1024e, Maria Magdalena Island, Mexico, 3-4 m depth, November 16, 2010, col. G. Gallard and R. Riosmena, det. N. M. Robinson; INMX-1066, Santa Rosalia, Gulf of Califonia, Mexico, 1 m depth, March 28, 2009, col. R. Riosmena, det. N. M. Robinson; CFCR-876, Bahía Virador, Costa Rica, 5-6 m depth, August 1, 2009, col. C. Fernández-García, det. N. M. Robinson; CFCR-798, Marino Ballena National Park, Ballena Island, Costa Rica, 15-16 m depth, July 16, 2009, col. C. Fernández-García, det. N. M. Robinson.
RESULTS
The vegetative and reproductive anatomy of the specimens examined indicated that all thalli did fall within the morphological circumscription of Lithothamnion muelleri even with striking differences in their habitats.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Map showing the new distribution of Lithothamnion muellerialong the coast of the Americas. 1, San Juan Island, Washington,USA; 2, Bahía Concepción, Gulf of California, Mexico; 3, Punta Galeras,Mexico; 4, Santa Rosalia, Mexico; 5, Loreto, Mexico (Rivera et al. 2004,Foster et al. 2007, Riosmena-Rodríguez et al. 2012); 6, María MagdalenaIsland, Mexico; 7, La Peña Rota, Nicaragua; 8, Ballena Island (MarinoBallena National Park), Costa Rica; 9, Bahía Virador, Costa Rica; 10,Archipelago Juan Fernández, Chile (Ramírez and Santelices 1991); 11,Espirito Santo, Brazil (Amado-Filho et al. 2010, Henriques et al. 2012);12, Fuegia, Argentina (Papenfuss 1964). Records for 1-4 and 6-9 arefrom the present study.
- Lithothamnion muelleri Lenormand ex Rosanoff 1866 (Tables 1&2,Figs 2-4)
Lectotype. CN (herb. Lenormand), from Western Port Bay, Victoria, collected by W. H. Harvey 1851, communicated by F. Mueller, lectotype designed by Woelkerling 1983, p. 193, Fig. 1 A.
Type locality. Western Port Bay, Victoria, collected by W. H. Harvey 1851, communicated by F. Mueller.
Illustrations of type material. Wilks and Woelkerling 1995, p. 572, Figs 1 & 2 .
Heterotypic synonyms. Archaeolithothamnion mirabile Foslie 1899, p. 3; Lithothamnion muelleri f. cingens Foslie 1900, p. 69; Lithothamnion gabrieli Foslie 1905, p. 3; Lithothamnion mirabile (Foslie) Foslie 1909, p. 4; Mesophyllum gabrielii (Foslie) Adey, 1970 p. 24.
- Vegetative morphology and anatomy
The vegetative structure of all specimens from the Eastern Pacific showed only slight variations. All thalli formed rhodoliths that were lumpy to fruticose in morphology
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Lithothamnion muelleri. Habit of the rhodolith thalli from different geographic areas. (A) Thallus from Mexico (María Magdalena Island). (B)Thallus from Nicaragua. (C) Thallus from Costa Rica. (D) Fruticose growth-form of L. muelleri from Washington. (E) Gametophyte from Costa Rica.Scale bars represent: A-E, 1 cm.
Geographical sites where rhodolith samples were collected in Washington, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Geographical sites where rhodolith samples were collected in Washington, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Lithothamnion muelleri. Vegetative features. Scanning electron micorscopy (SEM) photograph. (A) Longitudinal section showing fusioncells (arrowheds). (B) Longitudinal section showing flared epithallial cells (arrowheads) and subepithallial cells (arrow) that are similar in length totheir immediate inward derivatives. Scale bars represent: A & B, 25 μm.
( Fig. 2 ). The protuberances were cylindrical and typically 5-7 mm in diameter and 2-8 mm long. All branches were pseudoparenchymatous with monomerous construction. Cells of the filaments were 10-30 μm long and 7-15 μm in diameter, and they were joined by cell fusions (arrowheads in Fig. 3 A). In the epithallus filaments terminated in flared cells (arrowheads in Fig. 3 B), 2-5 μm long and 7-10 μm in diameter. The subepithallial cells (arrow in Fig. 3 B) were similar in length or shorter than their immediate inward derivatives. Trichocytes were absent. Clear growth bands were visible in many specimens. The monomerous internal structure of the rhodoliths consisted of a single system of branched filaments that formed a core and peripheral region. Portions of the core filaments and their derivatives curved outwards to the thallus surface forming a regular banding in the peripheral region.
- Reproductive anatomy
The reproductive thalli, when present, also shared critical features (see Table 2 ). The bi and tetrasporangial thalli all had multiporate conceptacles with 20-60 pores per chamber, and in surface view each had a protruding roof that sometimes sank centrally leaving the margin elevated like a ring ( Fig. 4 A & B). In tetrasporangial conceptacles, the roof filaments bordering the pore canals (arrowhead in Fig. 4 C) were composed of 3-5 cell layers of similar size and shape to other roof filament cells, and there was no depression around the pore. In surface view each pore was surrounded by 7-9 rosette cells which normally appeared collapsed and equal in size and shape to the other epithallial cells ( Fig. 4 D). Bispores, found only in Washington and Costa Rica, had dimensions similar to or larger than those known from Australian populations of this species. Carposporangial conceptacles were uniporate ( Fig. 4 E & F), and the roofs protruded above the thallus surface. Commonly, the conceptacle pores lacked senescent cells lining the pore (arrowhead in Fig. 4 F). Spermatangial conceptacles were uniporate, and the roofs protruded above or were flush with the surrounding thallus surface. Branched spermatangial filaments arose from the floor and wall of the conceptacle chamber. In the type material, sterile cells were present within the conceptacle chamber. However, in our collections, these cells were either not evident or appeared degenerated due to tetrasporangial development or to poor preservation of the older collections.
- Habitats and ecology
There were some similarities and some surprising differences in the habitats of the collections. At One Mile Reef in Washington (located one nautical mile SE of the Friday Harbor Laboratories), the bed contained only one rhodolith-forming species, L. muelleri . Swept by strong tidal currents, the rhodoliths occurred at 11 m depth and were located near a gravel bottom at the base of a rocky reef composed of outcroppings and boulders honeycombed with caves and crevices. The water temperature ranged from 7 to 10℃. In the Gulf of California, the beds always contained more than one rhodolith-forming species (Riosmena-Rodríguez et al. 2010). The habitats had flat to gently sloping bottoms, and they were in semi-protected sites around islands and in bays with depth ranges of 3-40 m. In Nicaragua and Costa Rica, the rhodolith beds occurred at depths of 5.5-16 m, and they were on sandy and rocky bottoms associated with coral communities. Most of the material for this study was collected during the dry season when upwelling occurs, and the sites were located in Papagayo, an upwelling region where the water is rich in phosphates and nitrates. In this area the water temperature typically ranges from 23 to 27℃, but a single upwelling episode can cause the temperature to drop 12℃ (Fernández-García et al. 2012).
- Geographic distribution
L. muelleri is a species with previous records for South and Western Australia (Wilks and Woelkerling 1995, Womersley 1996), New Zealand (Nelson 2012), and the tropical and subtropical Western Atlantic (Wynne 2011). It is known from South America (Espírito Santo) (Amado- Filho et al. 2010), the Gulf of California (Rivera et al. 2004, Foster et al. 2007, Riosmena-Rodríguez et al. 2012), and Korea (Lee and Kang 2001). These records and the localities provided in our work indicate a wide distribution of this species in the Western Pacific (Australia and New Zealand), the Eastern Pacific (Washington to Costa Rica), and the Southwestern Atlantic (Brazil).
Morphometric reproductive characteristics of Liththamnion muelleri from populations in Washington, Mexico (María Magdalena Island), Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Southern Australia, and BrazilND, not detected.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Morphometric reproductive characteristics of Liththamnion muelleri from populations in Washington, Mexico (María Magdalena Island), Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Southern Australia, and Brazil ND, not detected.
DISCUSSION
The exceedingly wide range of this species makes us wonder if the taxonomy is correct and if there might be cryptic species involved such as those described in recent molecular studies (Broom et al. 2008, Walker et al. 2009, Bittner et al. 2011). Unfortunately, our material was not well enough preserved to use molecular methods to detect these species. So instead, we carefully examined the diagnostic morphological and life history features that were available in an attempt to shed light on variations that might offer clues to any hidden species. Most characteristics were quite uniform, but a few were variable.
- Tetrasporangial roof anatomy
Wilks and Woelkerling (1995) considered characteristics of tetrasporangial roof anatomy as diagnostic for Australian species of Lithothamnion Heydrich. In order to differentiate genera and species in the subfamily Melobesioideae, recent descriptions have included the following features: 1) the position and shape of the conceptacle chambers, 2) the number and shape of cells forming the roofs of conceptacles, 3) the presence or absence of palisade cells within the chamber, and 4) the number of
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Lithothamnion muelleri. Reproductive features. (A) Longitudinal section of a tetrasporangial conceptacle bearing tetraspores (arrowhead).(B) Surface view of the multiporate conceptacle chamber (arrowhead). (C) Longitudinal section of the pore area (arrowhead) of a multiporateconceptacle showing cells lining the pore that are of equal length and shape to other cells that compose the roof. (D) Surface view of one pore(P) belonging to a multiporate chamber surrounded by 7 rosette cells (R). (B-D) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) photograph. (E) Uniporatecarposporangial conceptacle (arrowhead). (F) Carposporangial conceptacle, empty after release of carposporangia, that is lacking senescent cellslining the pore (arrowhead). Scale bars represent: A & F, 100 μm; B, 500 μm; C & D, 25 μm; E, 2 mm.
Instirosette cells around the pore area. We looked closely at the last feature. Athanasiadis et al. (2004) and Athanasiadis and Adey (2006) considered the characteristics of the rosette cells surrounding the pore area in multiporate roofs as a reliable and easily accessible feature for separating species in the genera Phymatolithon Foslie and Mesophyllum Me. Lemoine in the North Pacific. We investigated this feature for North Pacific Lithothamnion species and have found that it is only reliable when used in combination with other characteristics such as the shape and position of the rosette cells in relation to pore area. In L. muelleri the rosette cells in surface view normally appear collapsed and similar in size and shape to the other epithallial cells. Moreover, the number of rosette cells around the pores is variable in different regions. In our material from the Eastern Pacific, there were 7-9 rosette cells present. Specimens from Brazil are reported to have 6-7 cells (Amado-Filho et al. 2010), 8-10 cells (Henriques et al. 2012) and most specimens from Australia have 8-9 cells (Womersley 1996, Fig. 76C), and 9-11 (Wilks and Woelkerling 1995, p. 575, Fig. 4 D, LTB 15364). However, these differences did not seem to be significant enough to indicate separate species within L. muelleri .
- Growth-form differences in populations
In Australia, the crustose stage of L. muelleri does not form rhodoliths (Wilks and Woelkerling 1995), but in North America, it generally does (Foster et al. 2007). In the literature growth-form variations have been attributed to differences in environmental factors such as hydrodynamic conditions, depth, coastal morphology or bioturbation (Bosellini and Ginsburg 1971, Riosmena- Rodríguez et al. 1999, Goldberg 2006, Gagnon et al. 2012), However, recent studies have shown that the ability to form rhodoliths may be caused by a genetic feature, a plesiomorphic trait inherited from a common ancestor (Hernández-Kantún unpublished data). Further genetic and environmental studies on rhodolith-forming species are obviously necessary if we are to accurately understand the factors generating their development.
- Life history differences in populations
The major life history difference we see in our collections of L. muelleri is the occurrence of only bisporic populations at the end points of its range in Washington and Costa Rica. We assume this is due to environment stress. Indeed, this has been proposed by Adey et al. (2005) for another species, L. tophiforme (Esper) Unger, from arctic / subarctic regions. These authors discovered bisporic populations of this species at depths of >10 m and temperatures of <10℃ that they felt were apomictic, reproducing asexually. The low light and low temperature conditions could easily stress these populations. The end-point populations of L. muelleri endure high current and upwelling conditions, the latter often associated with rapid temperature changes. In the San Juan Islands, strong tidal currents and upwelling are common. In Costa Rica, periodic changes in currents and temperature have been well-studied in the Papagayo upwelling region where most of our collections were made. Upwelling occurs between December and April each year when the NE Trade Winds cross the lowlands from the Caribbean to the Pacific (Legeckis 1988, McCreary et al. 1989), and water temperatures fluctuate dramatically. Although temperature and current conditions appear to be the obvious environmental stressors generating bisporic populations, the exact mechanism of how this occurs has yet to be investigated in rhodolith populations.
Our collections and detailed morphological studies have documented the surprisingly wide latitudinal distribution of L. muelleri along the American continent. We have been unable to find stable morphological features that might differentiate cryptic subspecies. However, our study has underscored for us the critical need for additional studies on the taxonomy, distribution, and biology of coralline algae. These taxonomically difficult species dominate much of the subtidal zone, and their presence or absence may herald detrimental environmental changes. It is particularly urgent that basic taxonomic and distributional studies are completed on this important group so that the information can be used to recognize and possibly prevent future long-term damages to the marine environment.
Acknowledgements
Rafael Riosmena-Rodríguez was supported by CONACYTSEMARNAT and CONACYT SEP for the studies inthe Gulf of California. Néstor Robinson acknowledgesscholarships from CONACYT and Cindy Fernández acknowledgessupport from the Universidad de Costa Ricaand the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de León, Nicaragua.Gayle I. Hansen was given space for her herbariumand laboratory as a visiting researcher at the US EnvironmentalProtection Agency in Newport, Oregon. We alsoacknowledge Jazmín Hernández Kantún and Pierce Lalorfor their kind support with the SEM pictures at Ryan Institute, National University of Galway, Ireland.
References
Adey W. H. , Chamberlain Y. M. , Irvine L. M. 2005 An SEMbasedanalysis of the morphology, anatomy, and reproductionof Lithothamnion tophiforme (Esper) Unger(Corallinales, Rhodophyta), with a comparative studyof associated north arctic/subarctic Melobesioideae. J. Phycol. 41 1010 - 1024
Amado-Filho G. M. , Maneveldt G. , Manso R. C. C. , Marins-Rosa B. V , Pacheco M. R. , Guimarães S. M. P. B. 2007 Structure of rhodolith beds from 4 to 55 meters deepalong the southern coast of Espírito Santo State, Brazil. Cienc. Mar. 33 399 - 410
Amado-Filho G. M. , Maneveldt G. W. , Pereira-Filho G. H. , Manso R. C. C. , Bahía R. G. , Barros-Barreto M. B. , Guimarães S. M. P. B. 2010 Seaweed diversity associatedwith a Brazilian tropical rhodolith bed. Cienc. Mar. 36 371 - 391
Athanasiadis A. , Adey W. H. 2006 The genus Leptophytum(Melobesioideae, Corallinales, Rhodophyta) on the Pacificcoast of North America. Phycologia 45 71 - 115
Athanasiadis A. , Lebednik P. A. , Adey W. H. 2004 The genusMesophyllum (Melobesioideae, Corallinales, Rhodophyta)on the northern Pacfic coast of North America. Phycologia 43 126 - 165
Bittner L. , Payri C. E. , Maneveldt G. W. , Couloux A. , Cruaud C. , De Reviers B. , Le Gall 2011 Evolutionary historyof the Corallinales (Corallinophycidae, Rhodophyta)inferred from nuclear, plastidial and mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 61 697 - 713
Bosellini A. , Ginsburg R. N. 1971 Form and internal structureof recent algal nodules (Rhodolites) from Bermuda.J. Geol. 79:669-682. J. Geol. 79 669 - 682
Broom J. E. , Hart D. R. , Farr T. J. , Nelson W. A. , Neill K. F. , Harvey A. S. , Woelkerling W. J. 2008 Utility of psbAand nSSU for phylogenetic recontruction in the Corallinalesbased on New Zealand taxa. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 46 958 - 973
Dawson E. Y. 1960 New records of marine algae from PacificMexico and Central America. Pac. Nat. 1 31 - 52
Fernández C. 2008 Flora marina del Parque Nacional Isladel Coco, Costa Rica, Pacífico Tropical Oriental. Rev.Biol. Trop. 56 57 - 69
Fernández-García C , Cortés J , Alvarado J. J. , Nivia-Ruiz J. 2012 Physical factors contributing to the benthic dominanceof the alga Caulerpa sertularioides (Caulerpaceae,Chlorophyta) in the upwelling Bahía Culebra, north Pacific of Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 60 93 - 107
Figueiredo M. A. de O. , Santos de Menezes K. , Costa-Paiva E. M. , Paiva P. C. , Ventura C. R. R. 2007 Experimentalevaluation of rhodoliths as living substrata for infaunaat the Abrolhos Bank, Brazil. Cienc. Mar. 33 427 - 440
Foster M. S. 2001 Rhodoliths: between rocks and soft places. J. Phycol. 37 659 - 667
Foster M. S , McConnico L. M , Lundsten L , Wadsworth T , Kimball T , Brooks L. B , Medina-López M , Riosmena-Rodríguez R , Hernández-Carmona G , Vásquez-Elizondo R. M , Johnson S. , Steller D. L. 2007 Diversityand natural history of a Lithothamnion muelleri-Sargassumhorridum community in the Gulf of California. Cienc. Mar. 33 367 - 384
Gagnon P. , Matheson K. , Stapleton M. 2012 Variation inrhodolith morphology and biogenic potential of newlydiscovered rhodolith beds in Newfoundland and Labrador(Canada). Bot. Mar. 55 85 - 99
Goldberg N. 2006 Age estimates and description of rhodolithsfrom Esperance Bay, Western Australia. J. Mar. Biol.Assoc. U. K. 86 1291 - 1296
Harvey A. S. , Bird F. L. 2008 Community structure of a rhodolithbed from cold-temperate waters (southern Australia). Aust. J. Bot. 56 437 - 450
Henriques M. C. , Villas-Boas A , Riosmena Rodríguez R. , Figueiredo M. A. O. 2012 New records of rhodolithformingspecies (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) from deepwater in Espírito Santo State, Brazil. Helgol. Mar. Res. 66 219 - 231
Konar B. , Riosmena-Rodríguez R. , Iken K. 2006 Rhodolithbed: a newly discovered habitat in the North PacificOcean. Bot. Mar. 49 355 - 359
Lee Y. P. , Kang S. Y. 2001 A catalogue of the seaweeds in Korea. Cheju National University Press Jeju 662 -
Legeckis R. 1988 Upwelling off the Gulfs of Panamá and Papagayoin the tropical Pacific during March 1985. J. Geophys.Res. 93 15485 - 15489
Lemoine M. 1929 Les Corallinacées de l’Archipel des Galapagoset du Golfe de Panama. Arch. Mus. Natl. d’Hist. Nat. Paris Sér. 64 37 - 88
Littler M. M. , Littler D. S. 2008 Coralline algal rhodolithsfrom extensive benthic communities in the Gulf ofChiriqui, Pacific Panama. Coral Reefs 27 553 -
McCreary J. P , Lee H. S. , Enfield D. B. 1989 The responseof the coastal ocean to strong offshore winds: with applicationto circulations in the gulfs of Tehuantepec andPapagayo. J. Mar. Res. 47 81 - 109
Nelson W. A. 2012 Phylum Rhodophyta: red algae. In Gordon,D. P. (Ed.) New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity.Vol. 3. Kingdoms Bacteria, Protozoa, Chromista, Plantae, Fungi. Canterbury University Press Christchurch 327 - 346
Papenfuss G. F. 1964 Catalogue and bibliography of antarcticand sub-antarctic benthic marine algae. In Lee, M. O.(Ed.) Bibliography of the Antarctic Seas. Vol. 1. American Geophysical Union Washington, D.C. 1 - 76
Peña V. , Bárbara I. 2010 New records of crustose seaweedsassociated with subtidal maërl beds and gravel bottomsin Galicia (NW Spain). Bot. Mar. 53 41 - 61
Ramírez M. E. , Santelices B. 1991 Catálogo de las algasmarinas bentónicas de la costa temperada del Pacíficode Sudamérica. Monografías Biológicas 5. Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago 437 -
Riosmena-Rodríguez R. , López Calderón J. M. , Mariano-Meléndez E. , Sánchez-Rodríguez A. , Fernández-Garcia C. 2012 Size and distribution of Rhodolith bedsin Loreto Marine Park: their role in coastal processes. J.Coast. Res. 28 255 - 260
Riosmena-Rodríguez R. , Steller D. L. , Hinojosa-Arango G. , Foster M. S. 2010 Reefs that rock and roll: the biologyand conservation of rhodolith beds in the Gulf ofCalifornia. In Brusca, R. C. (Ed.) The Gulf of California:Biodiversity and Conservation. Arizona University Press and the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Tucson, AZ 49 - 71
Riosmena-Rodríguez R. , Woelkerling W. J. , Foster M. S. 1999 Taxonomic reassessment of rhodolith-formingspecies of Lithophyllum (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) inthe Gulf of California, Mexico. Phycologia 38 401 - 417
Rivera M. G. , Riosmena-Rodríguez R. , Foster M. S. 2004 Age and growth of Lithothamnion muelleri (Corallinales,Rhodophyta) in the southwestern Gulf of California,Mexico. Cienc. Mar. 30 235 - 249
Steller D. L. , Riosmena-Rodríguez R. , Foster M. S. 2009 Living rhodolithbed ecosystems in the Gulf of California.In Johnson, M. E. & Ledesma-Vázquez, J. (Eds.) Atlasof Coastal Ecosystems in the Gulf of California: Past andPresent. University of Arizona Press Tucson, AZ 72 - 82
Villas-Boas A. B. , Riosmena-Rodríguez R. , Amado-Filho G. M. , Maneveldt G. W. , Figueiredo M. A. de O. 2009 Rhodolith-forming species of Lithophyllum (Corallinales;Rhodophyta) from Espírito Santo State, Brazil, includingthe description of L. depressum sp. nov. Phycologia 48 237 - 248
Walker R. H. , Brodie J. , Russell S. , Irvine L. M. 2009 Biodiversityof coralline algae in the Northeastern Atlanticincluding Corallina caespitosa sp. nov. (Corallinoideae,Rhodophyta). J. Phycol. 45 287 - 297
Wilks K. M. , Woelkerling W. J. 1995 An account of southernAustralian species of Lithothamnion (Corallinaceae,Rhodophyta). Aust. Syst. Bot. 8 549 - 583
Woelkerling W. J. 1988 The coralline red algae: an analysisof the genera and subfamilies of nongeniculate Corallinaceae. British Museum (Natural History) and Oxford University Press London 268 -
Woelkerling W. J , Irvine L. M. , Harvey A. S. 1993 Growthformsin non-geniculate coralline red algae (Corallinales,Rhodophyta). Aust. Syst. Bot. 6 277 - 293
Womersley H. B. S. 1996 The marine benthic flora of southernAustralia. Part IIIB. Gracilariales, Rhodymeniales,Corallinales and Bonnemaisoniales. Australian Biological Resources Study Canberra 392 -
Wynne M. J. 2011 A checklist of benthic marine algae of thetropical and subtropical western Atlantic: third revision. Nova Hedwigia Beih. 140 7 - 166