Investigation of Reaction Paths from Si + CH<sub>4</sub> to C + SiH<sub>4</sub> and from Si + CH<sub>3</sub>F to C + SiH<sub>3</sub>F: Intrinsic Reaction Coordinate Studies
Investigation of Reaction Paths from Si + CH4 to C + SiH4 and from Si + CH3F to C + SiH3F: Intrinsic Reaction Coordinate Studies
Journal of the Korean Chemical Society. 2016. Apr, 60(2): 149-153
Copyright © 2016, Korean Chemical Society
  • Received : February 02, 2016
  • Accepted : March 08, 2016
  • Published : April 20, 2016
Export by style
Cited by
About the Authors
Han-Gook, Cho

PPT Slide
Lager Image
Si is a metalloid that readily donates or shares its four valence electrons to form chemical bonds, combining with many other element to form various compounds. 5 Unlike carbon it sometimes accept additional electrons to form hypervalent products with five or six bonds. 6 Recent matrix spectroscopic studies have shown that silicon, like transitionmetals, readily undergoes C-X (X = H, halogen) insertion and following X migration from C to Si in reactions with methane and halomethanes, generating small methyl silylenes, silaethenes, and silyl carbenes without a trace of hypervalent products. 7
Maier et al . have identified CH 3 -SiH and CH 2 =SiH 2 in reactions of Si + CH 4 from the matrix spectra and also proposed a reaction path (initial C-H insertion by Si and following H migration), 2 which is in fact similar to that for reaction of a transition-metal with methane. 7,8 They have later reported production of halogenated derivatives (CH 3 -SiX and CH 2 =SiHX) in reactions of Si with methyl halides. 3 Schreiner et al . have observed HC-SiH 3 from matrix ESR and infrared spectra in reaction of C( 3 P) with SiH 4 and the ESR hyperfine structures indicate that the silyl carbene owns a triplet ground state like other carbenes (CX 2 , X = H, halogen). 4 Cho and Andrews have shown that the silaethene is the primary product in reactions of dihalomethanes and the silyl carbenes in reactions of tri- and tetrahalomethanes. 7
These Si bearing products from its s 2 p 2 electron configuration are in fact similar to those from Ti (s 2 d 2 ) reactions, but the Ti methylidynes (XC÷TiX 3 ) own a much stronger C-Ti bond by effective electron donation from C to Ti’s low lying d-orbitals. 24,7,8 The previous studies have shown that Ti also generates CH 3 -MH and CH 2 =MH 2 in reactions with CH 4 , but they produce CH 2 =MX 2 with CH 2 X 2 and triplet methylidynes (HC÷CX 3 and XC÷MX 3 ) with tri- and tetrahalomethanes. 7,8 Substitution of H with halogen increases the stability of the higher oxidation-state compounds due to the stability of M-X bond.
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations 9 were carried out for the Si bearing products and transition states using the Gaussian 09 package, 10 the B3LYP hybrid density functional, 11 and the 6-311++G(3df, 3pd) basis sets for H, C, F, and Si. 12 Geometries were fully relaxed during optimization, and the optimized geometry was confirmed by vibrational analysis, all real frequencies for a stable conformation and a single imaginary frequency for a transition state. Each transition state was linked to its reactant and product by intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculation. 1 Natural bond orbital (NBO) calculations 13 were also done to examine the bond properties of the Si compounds and electron-donations between the MO’s. The vibrational frequencies were calculated analytically. In the calculation of binding energy for a Si product, the zero-point energy is included.
Due to the law of spin conservation and the ground states of C and Si ( 3 P), these Si reactions most probably occur in a triplet potential surface. . 1 illustrates the energies of the products and transition states relative to the reactants [Si( 3 P) + CH 4 and Si( 3 P) + CH 3 F]. These results reveal that both the C-H and C-F insertion reactions by atomic Si have to go over a considerable barrier, requiring extra photon energy to provide enough kinetic energy to the reactants in a cold matrix. It is consistent with the observed results that the Si products were generated during photolysis after original deposition. 24
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Energies of the products and transition states relative to Si(3P) + CH4 (a) and those of the monofluorided analogues to Si(3P) + CH3F (b) calculated at the the B3LYP/6-311++G (3df, 3pd) level of theory. Each transition state is confirmed by linking it to its reactant and product by intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations as shown in Figs. 2-4.
TS1, TS2, and TS3 in the methane reaction are considerably higher than the reactants [107, 126, and 177 kJ/mol higher than Si( 3 P) + CH 4 as shown in . 1(a) ], indicating that the reaction becomes increasingly more difficult as moving toward its end [SiH 4 + C( 3 P)]. The previous studies have also shown that while the insertion compound (CH 3 - SiH) is the primary reaction product on UV photolysis (λ = 185 or 254 nm), and the silaethane is detected after additional UV irradiation (λ = 254 nm), but HC-SiH 3 is not observed. 2 The silyl carbene is provided later in reaction of SiH 4 + C( 3 P), 4 which is 372 kJ/mol higher in energy than Si( 3 P) + CH 4 . This reaction [SiH 4 + C( 3 P) → HC-SiH 3 (T)] is evidently barrierless as shown in . 1(a) [and . 4(a) ] while the next reaction step from HC-SiH 3 (T) to CH 2 -SiH 2 (T) requires a substantial activation energy (151 kJ/mol), leading to provision of the silyl carbene (HC-SiH 3 ). 4
Inter-system crossing is supposed to take place once CH 3 -SiH and CH 2 =SiH are generated; the singlet methyl silylene and silaethene are 153 and 171 kJ/mol more stable than the reactants. Maier et al . have also reported that the observed vibrational characteristics of the methyl silylene and silaethene correlate with the predicted values for their singlet states. 2 On the other hand, all our attempts to optimize the geometry of singlet HC-SiH 3 ended up with the structure of CH 2 =SiH 2 , suggesting that singlet HC-SiH 3 is not a meaningful energy minimum. The observed vibrational characteristics and ESR hyperfine structures also correlate with those predicted for triplet HC-SiH 3 . 4
In reaction of Si( 3 P) + CH 3 F, TS1, TS2, and TS3 are considerably lower than those in the Si( 3 P) + CH 4 system, 56, -65, -37 kJ/mol higher than the reactants [ . 1(b) ]. Therefore, C-F insertion by Si to form CH 3 -SiF is expected to be easier, but the following conversions to CH 2 -SiHF and to HC-SiH 2 F to be more difficult. The F bearing Si products are relatively more stable than the corresponding analogues in the Si( 3 P) + CH 4 system due to the strong Si-F bond (540 kJ/mol). 14 Maier et al . have observed a Si adduct (CH 3 F···Si) in the original deposition spectrum, which easily converts to CH 3 -SiF by short UV or visible photolysis. 3 CH 2 =SiHF was observed later on much longer irradiation with λ = 366 nm.
The fluorosilyl carbene (HC-SiH 2 F), which is expected to be more difficult to provide as shown in . 1(b) , has not been reported. However, the present results indicate that provision of HC-SiH 2 F is probably possible via reaction of C( 3 P) + SiH 3 F, parallel to the case of HC-SiH 3 , where the silyl carbene is produced in reaction of laser-ablated graphite plume with a SiH 4 /Ar gas mixture on the surface of a cold window (1-12 K) by Schreiner et al . 4 As shown in . 1(b) and 4(b) , the Si-H insertion reaction by C is apparently barrierless and continuous downhill to HC-SiH 2 F, while the reaction from HC-SiH 2 F to CH 2 -SiHF has to go over a considerable barrier (161 kJ/mol), making the fluorosilyl carbene a stable conformation.
CH 3 -SiF and CH 2 =SiHF are also expected to undergo system crossing to their singlet ground states, which are 182 and 134 kJ/mol more stable than the triplet counter parts. Maier et al . have also reported that the observed vibrational characteristics of the fluorided products correlate with the computed values for the singlet species. 3 The silyl carbene, on the other hand, has a triplet ground state. Our attempts for geometry optimization of singlet HC-SiH 2 F all lead to the structure of singlet CH 2 =SiHF, indicating that this singlet fluorosilyl carbene is also not a meaningful energy minimum.
. 2 and 3 illustrate our IRC computation results for the reaction steps in the course of Si( 3 P) + CH 4 →HC-SiH 3 (T) and those for the fluorided counterparts, showing that each step is a smooth conversion over its barrier. 4 shows the energy variations in conversions of HC-SiH 3 to C( 3 P) + SiH 4 (a) and HC-SiH 2 F to C( 3 P) + SiH 3 F (b), both of which are barrierless and continuous uphill. . 2 - 4 also show that the product of a previous reaction step is the reactant of the next reaction step, the entire reaction path being a series of smooth conversions from one to another product. This suggests that the generally accepted reaction mechanism (initial C-H or C-F insertion and subsequent H migrations) is most probably the true reaction course, which connects the saddle points in the triplet potential surface.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Energy variations in the reaction steps form Si(3P) + CH4→HC-SiH3(T). Intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations are done for the transition states at the level of B3LYP/6-311++G(3df, 3pd), showing that the reported silicon bearing products are the energy minima in the triplet potential surface.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Energy variations in the reaction steps form Si(3P) + CH3F→HC-SiH2F(T). Intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations are done for the transition states at the level of B3LYP/6-311++G(3df,3pd), showing that the reported silicon bearing products are the energy minima in the triplet potential surface.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Energy variations in reactions from HC-SiH3 to C(3P) + SiH4 (a) and from HC-SiH2F to C(3P) + SiH3F (b). These IRC calculation results show that they are barrierless, uphill reactions to the energetically high products.
The structures of triplet CH 3 -SiH and CH 3 -SiF in . S1 and S2 are similar to those of the singlet counterparts, 2,3 whereas triplet CH 2 -SiH 2 and CH 2 -SiHF own non-planar structures due to lack of C-Si π-bond (natural C-Si bond orders 13 0.99 and 0.98), which contrasts the more usual planar or near planar geometry in the singlet states. 2,3,7,8 The structure of triplet HC-SiH 3 is almost identical to the reported structure, 4 carrying a bent HCSi moiety (160.5°) due to the unpaired electrons staying on C. Other carbenes also have a bent structure (e.g. 135.2° for CH 2 at the same level of theory). The non-bonding electrons reportedly have considerable contribution to the C-Si bond (π characters), leading to a shorter C-Si bond ( Figs . S1 and S2). 7
In conclusion, the Si bearing products and transition states in the triplet reaction paths from Si( 3 P) + CH 4 to C( 3 P) + SiH 4 and from Si( 3 P) + CH 3 F to C( 3 P) + SiH 3 F have been examined. Each transition state is linked by IRC computation to its reactant and product, confirming that the reaction path is a series of smooth conversions from one to another reported product. 24 Unlike other reaction steps, conversion of silyl carbene to C( 3 P) + SiH 3 X (X = H or F) is a continuous, barrierless uphill. Therefore, the unreported fluorosilyl carbene may be prepared in reaction of atomic C with SiH 3 F, similar to the case of HC-SiH 3 . 4 The silyl carbenes have a triplet ground state, leading to a bent HCSi moiety. The triplet methyl silylene and silaethenes with unusual non-planar structures are supposed to undergo a system crossing to the singlet ground state, whose vibrational characters correlate with the experimentally observed values. 24
Supporting Information. Figs. S1 and S2 showing the molecular structures of methyl silylene, silaethene, and silyl carbene and the involved transition states in reaction paths of Si(3P) + CH4 → C(3P) + SiH4 and Si(3P) + CH3F → C(3P) + SiH3F.
This work is supported by Incheon National University Research Grant in 2013.
Fukui K. 1981 Acc. Chem. Res. 14 363 -    DOI : 10.1021/ar00072a001
Schreiner P. R. , Reisenauer H. P. , Sattelmeyer K. W. , Allen W. D. 2005 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (35) 12156 -    DOI : 10.1021/ja052043r
Cho H.-G. , Andrews L. Inorg. Chem. in press
Kohn W. , Sham L. J. 1965 Phy. Rev. 140 (4A) A1133 - 1133
Frisch M. J. , Trucks G. W. , Schlegel H. B. , Scuseria G. E. , Robb M. A. , Cheeseman J. R. , Scalmani G. , Barone V. , Mennucci B. , Petersson G. A. , Nakatsuji H. , Caricato M. , Li X. , Hratchian H. P. , Izmaylov A. F. , Bloino J. , Zheng G. , Sonnenberg J. L. , Hada M. , Ehara M. , Toyota K. , Fukuda R. , Hasegawa J. , Ishida M. , Nakajima T. , Honda Y. , Kitao O. , Nakai H. , Vreven T. , Montgomery, J. A. Jr. , Peralta J. E. , Ogliaro F. , Bearpark M. , Heyd J. J. , Brothers E. , Kudin K. N. , Staroverov V. N. , Kobayashi R. , Normand J. , Raghavachari K. , Rendell A. , Burant J. C. , Iyengar S. S. , Tomasi J. , Cossi M. , Rega N. , Millam J. M. , Klene M. , Knox J. E. , Cross J. B. , Bakken V. , Adamo C. , Jaramillo J. , Gomperts R. , Stratmann R. E. , Yazyev O. , Austin A. J. , Cammi R. , Pomelli C. , Ochterski J. W. , Martin R. L. , Morokuma K. , Zakrzewski V. G. , Voth G. A. , Salvador P. , Dannenberg J. J. , Dapprich S. , Daniels A. D. , Farkas O. , Foresman J. B. , Ortiz J. V. , Cioslowski J. , Fox D. J. 2009 Gaussian 09, Revision A.02 Gaussian, Inc. Wallingford, CT
Frisch M. J. , Pople J. A. , Binkley J. S. 1984 J. Chem. Phys. 80 3265 -    DOI : 10.1063/1.447079
Reed A. E. , Curtiss L. A. , Weinhold F. 1988 Chem. Rev. and references therein 88 899 -    DOI : 10.1021/cr00088a005
Ebbing D. D. 1996 General Chemistry 5th Ed. Houghton Mifflin Boston