Effect of Acetate Promotor on the Pd-Au/SiO<sub>2</sub>-catalyzed Synthesis of Vinyl Acetate from the Reaction of Ethylene with Acetic Acid
Effect of Acetate Promotor on the Pd-Au/SiO2-catalyzed Synthesis of Vinyl Acetate from the Reaction of Ethylene with Acetic Acid
Journal of the Korean Chemical Society. 2011. Feb, 55(1): 92-97
Copyright © 2011, The Korean Chemical Society
  • Received : December 01, 2010
  • Accepted : December 24, 2010
  • Published : February 20, 2011
Export by style
Cited by
About the Authors
Hossein, Atashi
Kazem, Motahari
Farshad Farshchi, Tabrizi
Majid, Sarkari
Farhad, Fazlollahi

The effect of Group I alkali acetate promoters on vinyl acetate ( VA ) synthesis was evaluated. Catalyst product selectivity and ethylene conversion are compared to the unpromoted catalyst in the fixed-bed reactor with oxidation reaction of ethylene and acetic acid in gaseous phase over Pd-Au/SiO 2 catalyst. It was found that: a) the promoters were stabilized on the catalyst surface, b) common effect for the alkali promoted Pd-Au catalysts increaseed in product selectivity and ethylene conversion compared to unpromoted catalyst (these effects increase from top to the bottom of Group I). These promoting effect is due to the common-ion effect of acetate, present in the reaction, resulting in an increase in the activity of the catalyst. In addition a complementary theory for the effect of Au in the structure of the catalyst is proposed the imposition of distribution of palladium particles through decreasing the particle’s diameter.
Acetoxylation of ethylene on Pd-Au bimetallic silicasupported catalysts promoted with alkali metal acetate is a well-founded commercial route for the synthesis of VA. 1 - 11 Previously, the reaction of acetylene and acetic acid had a conversion of 92-98%. 12 , 13 However, with the breakthrough of inexpensive ethylene and lower production of acetylene, the process became obsolete leading to replacement by oxidation reaction of ethylene and acetic acid to an extent that over 80 percent of the world’s current vinyl acetate production is obtained through this process 14 where the ideal reaction path away is:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
and aforementioned process lies in the side reaction between ethylene and oxygen which due to combustion of CO 2 production:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The former proposal is less applicable due to explosive reaction of oxygen and ethylene at which halides may be used to prevent such a problem however they cause catalyst deactivation. Therefore the main focus of current research is on the latter method through changing the characteristics of the catalyst; and hence increase the activity and selectivity of the catalyst. Moreover, in catalytic processes where the catalyst activity is low or the catalyst is deactivated during the process, promoters play a significant role in increasing the catalyst activity. Lately, the use of promoters in vinyl acetate synthesis has become a great interest among research. Due to this, the catalyst used in the early processes have evolved from palladiumbased to more developed alloys of palladium-gold based on silica or aluminum in recent years. 15
For the mechanism and influence of promoters, different theories have been proposed on how the increase in desired properties of the catalyst is achieved. Provine et al . 16 , 17 believed that the increase of vinyl acetate production by addition of Au-potassium acetate is due to electrons cohesion increases the amount of adsorbed reactants to the catalyst, while Nakamura et al . 3 , 18 proclaims that the palladium acetate intermediate is oxidized faster in present of potassium acetate and upon termination, palladium acetate is fully reacted and conceives that the potassium acetate promoter is consumed for the dissociation of palladium acetate and de-bonding of ethylene and acetate, however proof of this claim has not been provided. They have further suggested that the implementing of other anions does not influence over the effect of promoter.
It has been distinguished unpredictably that the vinyl acetate space/time yields and more particularly the life time of supported catalyst until regeneration thereof can be significantly increased when the catalyst is impregnated with a solution prepared from a mixture of various acetates of the metals Na, K, Cs or Rb instead of impregnation with a solution of a single alkali metal acetate. 19 The low melting point of the alkali metal acetate mixtures named above contributes to some extent to the catalyst activity, lower mixed melting points resulting in higher space/time yields and /or in a extended life time of the catalyst clearly. It is especially beneficial to use a eutectic mixture (melting point : 210 ℃) prepared from potassium acetate (melting point : 292 ℃) and sodium acetate (melting point : 324 ℃). This salt contributes to the formation of the acetic acid layer, as described by the reaction:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
which further prevents the combustion of ethylene. Moreover, the KOAc enhances the formation of actives centers through the solvation of palladium complexes as:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Therefore, a probable reaction mechanism could be formulated as follows:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
In this research, effect of alkali acetate promoters on vinyl acetate (VA) synthesis has been studied in fixed bed reactor with oxidation reaction of ethylene and acetic acid in gaseous phase over Pd-Au/SiO 2 catalyst. Also, detailed analysis of changes in selectivity and conversion of ethylene with respect to different alkali metallic acetate promoters are investigated and it is concluded that such promoters are stabilized the surface of catalyst.
- Catalyst preparation
1.0 wt%/Pd/0.5 wt%Au/SiO 2 (atomic ratio of Pd/Au 4:1) catalyst, were prepared by the incipient wet-impregnation method. The appropriate quantities of AuCl 3 and PdCl 2 were dissolved in deionized water to prepared a Pd 2+ and Au 3+ solution. A high-surface-area SiO 2 (600 m 2 /g, particle size 230-400 mesh, pore volume of 1.1 ml/g) was used as the support. The Pd 2+ Au 3+ solution, was then added to the SiO 2 powder by stirring to wet the support and in order to uniformly distribute the metal compound on the silica dried with agitation. The impregnated catalyst was allowed to stand for 5 h in a covered beaker. Finally, the precursor was dried under vacuum at 250 ℃ for 8 h before it was used. For promoted catalyst the acetates, e.g. of lithium, sodium, potassium, magnesium and calcium are used in a proportion of 1 to 20% by weight, referred to the weight of the carrier according to. 12
- X-ray diffraction
X-ray Diffraction (XRD) was also performed on the catalyst using a Philips PW 3373 with a copper anode. Diffractograms at degree of 32 to 50 with an increase of 2θ = 0.02 − 0.2 were obtained.
- Fixed Bed Reactor and the Reaction Conditions
All experiments were performed using a plug flow system. A reactor consisting of a 1.5 in inner diameter (ID) and 12 in length was filled with 200 g of Pd/SiO 2 catalyst at a pressure of 8 bar. The ratio of the catalyst mass to the feed (W/F) was maintained at 70 gr.mol -1 .min.
The feed mixture was composed of 44% ethylene, 18% acetic acid, 6% oxygen and the remaining was nitrogen. Ethylene, Oxygen and Nitrogen gases with a purity of 99.9% were obtained from Technical Services Co. while the acetic acid (99.9%) was provided by Arak Petrochemical Complex. The reactor temperature was controlled with a constant temperature bath with an accuracy of 0.01 ℃ at which ethylene glycol was used as the cycling fluid. Acetic acid was vaporized in the container and C 2 H 4 saturated with the acetic acid vapours, leaving the container at 120 ℃. The saturated gas was then combined with O 2 and N 2 . Oxygen gas is added on a concentration of less than %6 on molecular basis (by controlling the nitrogen concentration) in order to avoid an explosive reaction between ethylene and oxygen. In order to further increase the temperature of the reactants, the mixture was heated prior to entering the reactor. The reactants were then supplied to the reactor at a temperature of 160 ℃. The mixture leaving the reactor is condensed in two stages leaving the first at 85 ℃ and the second at 35 ℃C at which at this temperature vinyl acetate, acetic acid and water were obtained in liquid phase. Gaseous compounds consisting of un reacted feed were prepared for chromatography analysis. A schematic diagram of the process is shown in . 1 .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
A schematic of the vinyl acetate fixed bed reactor instrument.
Metallic promoters with corresponding compound percentages were injected into the reactor by a micro pump with an injection range of 0-0.1 ml/min and at a pressure of 10 bar. The inlet and outlet of the reactor were connected to a gas chromatograph; continuously determining the compound percentage of the entering and exiting compounds of the reactor. The experiments were performed for lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium and caesium acetate salts as promoters. The promoters were obtained from Merck Chemicals (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
- X-ray diffraction
The x-ray diffraction data for the catalyst are shown in . 2 . Using the Scherrer equation, 20 D = /Δcosθ, λ = 15 nm, (wavelength of diffraction), K = 0.94 (diffraction constant) and θ (wavelength peak), the average Pd particle size is estimated to be approximately 2.27 A o .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
X-rays diffraction data for the Pd(1.0 wt%)-Au(0.5 wt%)/SiO2 catalyst.
- Effect of Promoters on Ethylene Conversion and Selectivity
The effect of metallic acetate promoters have been measured for conversion of ethylene and product selectivity of the reaction. Promoters such as cesium acetate, rubidium acetate, potassium acetate, sodium acetate, lithium acetate compared to unpromoted catalyst have been examined and the results are given in . 3 and 4 . The promoters are obtained through 5% solution of the salt. As shown, the conversion rate and product selectivity for those experiments using promoters increases with respect to the experiment without a promoter. In addition, a stable condition with constant conversion rate and selectivity is reached in a shorter time when using promoters.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Ethylene conversion with time.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Reaction selectivity with time on stream.
With respect to the conversion of ethylene without the presence of promoters, the reaction rate is significantly reduced after 100 minutes and shows steady state operation. This can be described by the catalyst active sites being free at the beginning of the reaction, while as the reaction proceeds the reactants are adsorbed on the surface and therefore it can be deduced that the adsorption of the reactants are not the rate limiting step in the steady condition and rather other steps such as surface reaction can be the cause of limiting the reaction rate. Furthermore, it can be observed from that the selectivity is lower at the beginning, while after 100 minutes, there is a significant increase after which is remained constant throughout the reaction. This also can be explained by the fact that prior to the step of surface saturation from reactants; at which the rate of adsorption and desorption of reactants are the limiting step, the rate of desorption of side products such as water is higher than that of the main product (i.e. vinyl acetate). The conversion rate does not change significantly from potassium acetate to rubidium and cesium acetates however considerable increase of selectivity can be seen from these substances with cesium acetate giving the highest at approximately 89% constant after stability is obtained. The acetate salts of alkaline metals increase the reaction rate significantly while the effect is increased from the top to the bottom of the Group I in the periodic table.
However, the reason and mechanism of this promotion has not yet been entirely clarified. Interaction between palladium-acetate and potassium acetate has been investigated by Kragten et al . 21 stating that upon absence of alkali acetate salt promoters, palladium- acetate complexes appear more as a trimers while after addition of the promoter, the complexes appear in the form of dimers and are of main active reaction intermediates. However, the common-ion effect was more evident in this work. For more about this, the common ion obtained from the dissociation of acetate salts in available compounds on the catalyst bed; here an anion compound (acetate) performs as the effective common ion in all of the promoters used; thus improves adhesion of the acetic acid molecules to the catalyst surface, and forms the mediator material Pd(CH 3 CO), the main mediator in the reaction of vinyl acetate.
The increase in suitable effects related to heavier alkali metals is due to presence of more value of acetate ions in the reaction following reasons:
  • • Since the first group elements are electropositive, they have a low ionization potential and are oxidized readily. The ionization potential is also very dependent on the nuclei charge in which from top to bottom, this potential is reduced, and hence an easier oxidation and cat ion is achieved.
  • • In the alkali group according to energy levels, from top to bottom since the element’s last electron is further away from the nuclei than its previous element, the electron can be departed easier and therefore the tendency to oxidization is increased from top to bottom of the alkali group.
Due to the above reasons, acetate salt is easily ionized and increases because the heavier elements in the alkali group providing a higher acetate ion to the reaction and increasing the selectivity and conversion. In addition, as aforementioned in the mechanism section, the vinyl acetate production consists of several reactions initially between the reactants and the catalyst surface to produce the intermediates and forming the vinyl acetate. The major intermediates in these reactions can be regarded as palladiumacetate and palladium-ethylene. The increase in ethylene partial pressure will eventuate to increase the conversion rat. It can be concluded that with the increase of acetate ion, the concentration of the palladium-acetate complex and hereby the rate of formation of vinyl acetate will increase. However, the question may arise about the reason for observing no effect on the reaction rate with the increase of acetic acid partial pressure. In response, substantial consideration must be given to the fact that acetic acid is a weak acid with fairly low dissociation constant ( Ka = 1.8×10 -5 ), which upon increasing the concentration on the surface introduces minor change in the acetate ion concentration and does not significantly affect the concentration of the palladium-acetate complex. The increase of the reaction rate with increase of cationic property of a metal attached to acetate (as in promoters) is another reason consistent with the given postulation. Moreover, if metallic acetate promoters were to form a layer on the catalyst surface as proposed by Augustine et al ., 9 the effect of such promoters on the reaction rate must be reduced with the increase of cationic property from the top elements of the alkali group to the bottom due to higher dissociation and reduction of acetic acid concentration, however this is not the case as presented from above observation in this work. In addition to theories provided in the discussion part on the effect of Au in the palladium catalyst by Chen et al ., 24 our observation also complies with this theory while suggesting that Au imposes the distribution of palladium particles by decreasing the particle’s diameter.
In this work, detailed study of influence of promoters on the synthesis of vinyl acetate has been presented. Descriptions on changes in selectivity and ethylene conversion with respect to different alkali metallic acetate promoters were also provided. Experiments showed that the reaction rate of producing vinyl acetate in presence of Pd-Au catalysts, without implementing promoters can be very slow, thus it is not economically efficient. In contrast, metallic promoters increase the reaction rate and eventually increase the conversion and the selectivity of the reaction by creating an acid layer on the catalyst bed. Such property will increase by the electron donation of the metal connected to the acetate ion in acetate metallic salts to an extent that is less effective for acetate salts of rare metals as tin acetate, zinc acetate and lead acetate and more effective of alkali metals. In addition, the stability in conversion and selectivity is obtained in a shorter time with the use of these promoters and is increased from top to the bottom of the alkali group based elements. On the effect of Au in the palladium catalyst, our observation complies with theories given before while further suggesting that Au imposes the distribution of palladium particles through decreasing the particle’s diameter.
The authors acknowledge financial support from University of Sistan and Baluchestan and Arak’s petrochemical complex. Mr. Yaghoobi and Mr. Bakhshi are appreciatively acknowledged for technical support and collaboration on data gathering and Mr. Jokar for his support and help. Support from Arak’s petrochemical complex is gratefully acknowledged.
Allison E. G. , Bond G. C. 1972 Catal. Rev. 7 233 -    DOI : 10.1080/01614947208062259
Abel R. , Collins P. , Eichler K. , Nicolau I. , Peters D. , Ertl G. , Knözinger H. , Weitkamp J. 1997 Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis Wiley-VCH Weinheim vol. 5 2298 -
Nakamura S. , Yasui T. 1970 J. Catal. 17 366 -    DOI : 10.1016/0021-9517(70)90113-2
Samanos B. , Boutry P. 1971 J. Catal. 23 19 -    DOI : 10.1016/0021-9517(71)90019-4
Provine W. D. , Mills P. L. , Lerou J. J. 1996 Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 101 191 -
Macleod N. , Keel J. M. , Lambert R. M. 2004 Appl. Catal. A. 261 37 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.apcata.2003.10.032
Han Y. F. , Kumar D. , Goodman D. W. 2005 J. Catal. 230 353 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.12.018
Stacchiola D. , Calaza F. , Burkholder L. , Tysoe W. T. 2004 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 15384 -    DOI : 10.1021/ja044641w
Han Y. F. , Kumar D. , Sivadinarayana C. , Goodman D. W. 2004 J. Catal. 224 60 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.02.028
Han Y. F. , Wang J. H. , Kumar D. , Yan Z. , Goodman D. W. 2005 J. Catal. 232 467 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.jcat.2005.04.001
Kumar D. , Han Y. F. , Chen M. S. , Goodman D. W. 2006 Catal. Lett. 106 1 -    DOI : 10.1007/s10562-005-9182-7
Bissot C. T. 1976 US Patent, 4,048,096
Crathorne E. A. , MacGowan D. , Morris S. R. , Rawlinson A. P. 1994 J. Catal. 149 54 -    DOI : 10.1006/jcat.1994.1294
Johnson W. K. , Toki G. 2001 SRI Internatioanl: CEH Marketing Report
Rylander P. N. 1979 Catalytic Hydrogenation in Organic Synthesis Academic Press London
Macleod N. , Keel J. M. , Lambert R. M. 2004 Appl. Catal. A. 261 37 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.apcata.2003.10.032
Han Y. F. , Kumar D. , Goodman D. W. 2005 J. Catal. 230 353 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.12.018
Nakamura S. , Yasui T. 1971 J. Catal. 23 315 -    DOI : 10.1016/0021-9517(71)90220-X
Sennewald K. 1973 United States patent , 3 743 607
Shekhar R. , Barteau M. A. , Plank R. V. , Vohs J. M. 1997 Surf. Sci. Catal. 815 384 -
Kragten D. D. , Van Santen R. A. , Crawford M. K. , Provine W. D. , Lerou J. J. 1999 Inorg. Chem. 331 38 -
Augustine S. M. , Blitz J. P. 1993 J. of Catal. 312 142 -
Sennewald K. 1976 US patent, 3 743 607
Chen C. , Kumar D. , Yi C.W. , Goodman D. W. 2005 Surf. Sci. 291 310 -