Advanced
Protein-Directed Synthesis of γ-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Nanoparticles and Their Magnetic Properties Investigation
Protein-Directed Synthesis of γ-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles and Their Magnetic Properties Investigation
Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society. 2014. May, 35(5): 1375-1378
Copyright © 2014, Korea Chemical Society
  • Received : October 08, 2013
  • Accepted : January 15, 2014
  • Published : May 20, 2014
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Rouhollah Soleyman
Ali Pourjavadi
Polymer Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Nazila Masoud
Polymer Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Akbar Varamesh
Abolfazl Sattari
Chemical Science and Technology Research Division, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI), Tehran 1485733111, Iran

Abstract
In this study, maghemite (γ-Fe 2 O 3 ) nanoparticles were produced using gelatin protein as an effective mediator. Size, shape, surface morphology and magnetic properties of the prepared γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles were characterized using XRD, FT-IR, TEM, SEM and VSM data. The effects of furnace temperature and time of heating together with the amount of gelatin on the produced gelatin-Fe 3 O 4 nanocomposite were examined to prove the fundamental effect of gelatin; both as a capping agent in the nanoscale synthesis and as the director of the spinel γ-Fe 2 O 3 synthesis among possible Fe 2 O 3 crystalline structures.
Keywords
Introduction
In the last two decades, the use of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical applications has had fast growth and during this explosive expansion, most interests in the clinical utilization of magnetic nanoparticles have focused on maghemite (γ-Fe 2 O 3 ) nanoparticles because of their chemical inactivity, non-toxicity, biocompatibility, biodegradability, low particle dimension, large surface area and suitable magnetic properties. 1 - 4 Due to its spinel structure with two magnetically nonequivalent interpenetrating sub lattices, maghemite shows excellent magnetic behavior which has been used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast enhancement, 5 6 bio-magnetic separations, 7 hyperthermia treatment, 8 and magnetic drug targeting. 9 10
All these biomedical applications require nanoparticles with high magnetization values, sizes smaller than 100 nm, and narrow particle size distributions. Various methods have been reported for the synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles via coprecipitation of Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ ions in alkaline medium, 11 using sonochemical synthesis, 12 microwave-hydrothermal, 13 and chemical solutions. 14 Moreover, some bio-scaffolds such as polysaccharide, 15 DNAs, 16 viruses, 17 proteins and peptides, 18 - 20 have been utilized in the synthesis of magnetic nanostructures.
In this study, we have prepared maghemite (γ-Fe 2 O 3 ) nanoparticles after high temperature oxidation of gelatin- Fe 3 O 4 nanocomposite, obtained from Fe 3+ ions in alkaline medium in the presence of a protein (gelatin) as an effective capping agent. Overall, this method introduces a simple, soft and inexpensive procedure for synthesis of maghemite nanoparticles with narrow size distribution and pure crystalline phase. Also, the effect of temperature, time of heating and the amount of gelatin on the synthesis has been investigated by the use of various techniques.
Experimental
Materials . Pure gelatin, iron (III) sulfate and hydrazine hydrate solution (N 2 H 4 ·H 2 O, 80 wt %) were purchased from Merck Co. (Darmstadt, Germany) and Double distilled water was used for synthesis of nanoparticles.
Characterization . The powder particles were investigated by TEM (Modelno. CM120, Philips), XRD (D4 endeavor) (Cu Kα = 0.154 nm), and SEM (Modelno. S6100, Hitachi) for determining their shape, size and crystallinity. The interaction of nano-particles with protein, and their behavior before/after elimination of gelatin was investigated using an ABB Bomem MB-100 FT-IR spectrophotometer. The magnetic moment of the nanomaterials was measured using Lake Shore model 7400 vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) graph was taken on a Thermo Electron Corporation spectrometer with an Al Kα (1486.6 eV) radiation.
Synthesis of γ-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles . The maghemite nanoparticles were obtained by hydrothermal treatment of Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 solution in the presence of gelatin. Typically, aqueous Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 solution (20 mL, 0.05 M) was stirred with different concentrations of gelatin solutions of same volumes (5 mL). After stirring for 5 min, 8 mL absolute ethanol was added to the above solution. Finally, 80 wt % hydrazine hydrate solution (N 2 H 4 ᐧH 2 O) (10 ml) was added drop wise with vigorous stirring. After 10 min stirring, the mixture was treated for 24 h at 100 ℃, then protein was partially or completely eliminated at different furnace temperatures (400, 600 and 800 ℃) and various times (0.5, 1and 3 h).
Results and Discussion
In nature, it is shown that protein interactions not only direct nucleation of inorganic materials, but also control the crystal type, face, and size of these synthesized inorganic structures. 19 It has been reported that egg albumin protein could act as a unique mediator for the synthesis of Fe 3 O 4 nanotubes. A mechanism for the construction of these nanotubes has been suggested by Geng et al . 20 Upon this proposed mechanism, we decide to challenge it with other proteins like gelatin. After many attempts and various changes in the reaction conditions for attaining corresponding nanotubes, no nano tubular structures were synthesized. Nonetheless, we could obtain γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles instead, and we could prove synthesis of these nanoparticles and effect of gelatin protein in this synthesis. Actually, this discrimination can be correlated to the different conformations of different proteins, different orientation of proteins in the presence of ions, reaction conditions or perhaps existence of other ions and enzymes in the egg albumin in comparison to pure proteins.
A mechanism has been suggested for the synthesis of protein-mediated γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles: Fe 3+ ions and gelatin molecules start to self-assemble and form an organicinorganic complex in the aqueous solution of ethanol. Then, these ions are reduced by hydrazine, and a gelatin-Fe 3 O 4 nanocomposite structure is formed. In order to obtain detailed information about the surface composition, XPS analysis was employed, which is very sensitive to Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ cations and its related spectra are given in Figure 1 . In the Fe2p high-resolution XPS spectrum (magnified region), the binding energies around 710 and 723 eV are related to Fe (2p 3/2 ) and Fe (2p 1/2 ), respectively, which are very close to the values of Fe 3 O 4 published in the literature. 21 22 It is remarkable that no charge transfer satellite of Fe (2p 3/2 ) at about 720 eV is detected, indicating the formation of mixed oxides of Fe (II) and Fe (III), such as Fe 3 O 4 . 22
By increasing the gelatin-Fe 3 O 4 nan℃omposite temperature, non-covalent bonds (hydrogen bonds) and covalent bands such as peptide bonds start rupturing; at 600 ℃, gelatin completely is decomposed and perished, and spinel γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanostructures are remained. The composition and phase purity of the prepared products were examined by XRD analysis ( Figure 2 ). The XRD of the nan℃omposite at 400 ℃ shows a noisy pattern. It is well-known that materials with incomplete crystallinity or blends of crystalline and amorphous phases can lead to noisy XRD and broad background intensity signals. Many polymers and semiconductors where crystallinity is constrained to a limited part of the molecular structure are examples of materials that can lead to XRD patterns with broad background fluctuations and noisy signals. Also, broad background XRD patterns can be obtained for nanosized material due to the dispersion effect induced by the distribution of small particle size. 23 Thermogravimetrical analysis shows that the major weight loss of gelatin ℃curred around 200-500 ℃, and it can be one of the reasons of the noisy XRD pattern for the partially decomposed gelatin-Fe 3 O 4 nan℃omposite at 400 ℃. Moreover, the XRD pattern of the nanoparticles at 600 ℃ has a good conformity with the spinel structure of γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles (JCPDS card 39-1346) and its magnetic properties ( Figure 3 ) suggest the γ-Fe 2 O 3 synthesis as well. In addition, after increasing temperature up to 800 ℃, the XRD pattern indicates that γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles are completely converted to the pure rhombohedral because of good agreement of all XRD peaks with the XRD reference peaks of α-Fe 2 O 3 (JCPDS card 33-0664). The loss of magnetic properties of product proves α-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles formation as well.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Survey scan of gelatin-Fe3O4 composite and its highresolution XPS spectrum of Fe2p.
The FT-IR spectra of gelatin-Fe 3 O 4 nan℃omposite (400 ℃), γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles (600 ℃) and α-Fe 2 O 3 nano- particles (800 ℃) are given in Figure 4 . As the FT-IR peaks at 400 ℃ show, the gelatin protein in the gelatin-Fe 3 O 4 nan℃omposite has not been completely decomposed and the existence of gelatin residues in the Fe 3 O 4 nan℃omposite is perfectly obvious. The distinct peaks at 1623, 3140 and 3425 cm −1 indicate the existence of amide, hydroxyl and amine groups of gelatin at 400 ℃, respectively. Obviously at 600 and 800 ℃, the broad less intensive peaks around 3100- 3400 cm −1 demonstrate the presence of hydroxyl groups on the surface of iron oxides. 23 The absorption peak at 588 cm −1 identifies the vibration of γ (Fe-O). Other peaks at pure maghemite include 444, 632, 1635, 3129 and 3398 cm −1 . At 800 ℃, the peaks at 464 and 536 cm −1 are the characteristics of the α-Fe 2 O 3 structure and the other peaks are similar to the γ-Fe 2 O 3 structure.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
XRD patterns of gelatin-Fe3O4 nanocomposite at 400 ℃, γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles at 600 ℃.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The produced maghemite nanoparticles dispersed in ethanol at absence and present of magnetic field.
Figure 5 indicates SEM images of samples before and after gelatin decomposition, 500 ℃ and 600 ℃ respectively. As shown, when protein has not been completely decomposed [ Figure 5(a) , 500 ℃], γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles are placed on the gelatin substrate; but after complete decomposition [ Figure 5(b) , 600 ℃] only γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles are found.
TEM images ( Figure 6 ) were used to study the effect of gelatin on the formation of γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles. Figure 6(a) shows that without the presence of gelatin in the reaction medium, the product has no distinct particles (because of agglomeration). Figure 6(b) shows the effect of 1.0 gram gelatin on the formation of γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles, and proves that the nanoparticles have ellipsoid shape with mean particle size (about 70 nm). It has previously shown that proteins, such as gelatin, can play the role of capping agent in the synthesis of nanoparticles. In 2011, we have investigated on the role of gelatin in synthesis of silver nanoparticles. 24 Also; Lee et al . 25 have studied the effect of gelatin protein concentration on the synthesis of gold nanoparticles. Nonetheless; other data sets are more suggestive on effect of gelatin protein in nanoparticles synthesis. For instance, VSM data ( Figure 7 ) verifies that the product synthesized without gelatin mediator, lacks great magnetization moment. Indeed, the obtained material is α-Fe 2 O 3 , not γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles. Moreover, the related hysteresis loop (gelatin 1.0 g) at Figure 7 shows a great magnetization moment confirming magnetic properties of obtained γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles. These data suggests a substantial effect of gelatin on nanoparticles behavior. The marvelous fact of our results is that heating the bulk Fe 3 O 4 concludes in bulk α-Fe 2 O 3 , but heating the gelatin-Fe 3 O 4 nanocomposites leads to γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles. Briefly, these data confirm the role of gelatin protein as a good mediator and a key factor in the synthesis of γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
FT-IR spectra of gelatin-Fe3O4 nanocomposite at 400 ℃, γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles at 600 ℃ and α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles at 800 ℃.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
SEM images of (a) gelatin-Fe3O4 nanocomposite after 1 h curing at 500℃ and (b) synthesized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles after 1 h curing at 600℃ (complete decomposition of gelatin).
PPT Slide
Lager Image
TEM images of synthesized materials (a) without any gelatin (b) using 1.0 g gelatin.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Effect of gelatin amounts on VSM hysteresis loop of synthesized materials.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
VSM curves of synthesized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles at 600 ℃ in different times of curing in furnace.
Moreover, hysteresis diagrams ( Figure 7 , gelatin 2.0 g) show that increase in the amount of gelatin up to 2.0 gram doesn’t considerably change the morphology and the magnetic properties of γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles. Also, Figure 7 strictly confirms that the presence of gelatin is vital in the synthesis of γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles in this procedure. Surprisingly, Figure 7 indicates that non-gelatin synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles (blue curve) don’t have any magnetic properties.
In addition, the related VSM curves of the γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles ( Figure 8 ) demonstrate that time of heating in furnace has no distinguishable effect on magnetic properties of the nanoparticles after 1 h ( Figure 8 , 3 h) because of complete decomposition of the gelatin. However, the time of heating does have effect before 1 h ( Figure 8 , 0.5 h when the gelatin has not decomposed completely.
Conclusion
In summary, magnetic γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles have been synthesized by a gelatin-assisted growth process without any organic toxic solvents. This approach provides a simple, novel, and feasible method for preparing stable-magnetic γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles. Moreover, our study could prove effect of protein on size, shape and crystallinity of the synthesized inorganic nanoparticles.
References
Sun C. , Lee J. S. , Zhang M. 2008 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60 1252 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.018
Laurent S. , Forge D. , Port M. , Roch A. , Robic C. , Elst L. V. , Muller R. N. 2008 Chem. Rev. 108 2064 -    DOI : 10.1021/cr068445e
Mcbain S. C. , Yiu H. H. , Dobson I. 2008 Int. J. Nanomed. 3 169 -
Veiseh O. , Gunn J. W. , Zhang M. 2010 Drug Deliv. Rev. 62 284 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.002
Corot C. , Robert P. , Idee J. , Port M. 2006 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 58 1471 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.013
Mccarthy J. R. , Bhaumik J. , Karver M. R. , Erdem S. S. , Weissleder R. 2010 Mol. Oncol. 4 511 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.molonc.2010.08.003
Shamim N. , Hong L. , Hidajat K. , Uddin M. S. 2007 Separ. Sci. Technol. 53 164 -
Villanueva A. , Presa P. D. , Alonso J. M. , Rueda T. , Mart A. , Crespo P. , Rivero G. J. 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 1976 -    DOI : 10.1021/jp907046f
Alexiou C. , Diehl D. , Henninger P. , Iro H. , Röckelein R. , Schmidt W. , Weber H. 2006 IEEE T. Appl. Supercon. 16 1527 -    DOI : 10.1109/TASC.2005.864457
Kumar A. , Jena P. K. , Behera S. , Lockey R. F. , Mohapatra S. 2010 Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 6 64 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.nano.2009.04.002
Lin M. M. , Kim D. K. , Haj A. J. , Dobson J. 2008 IEEE T. Appl. Supercon. 7 298 -
Shafi K. V. , Ulman A. , Yan X. , Yang N. , Estourne C. , White H. , Rafailovich M. 2001 Langmuir 17 5093 -    DOI : 10.1021/la010421+
Sreeja V. , Joy P. A. 2007 Mater. Res. Bull. 42 1570 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.materresbull.2006.11.014
Wu Z. G. , Gao J. F. 2012 Micro. Nano. Lett. 7 533 -    DOI : 10.1049/mnl.2012.0310
Wei D. , Qian W. 2008 Colloid Surface B 62 136 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.09.030
Wang Z. , Zhang J. , Ekman J. M. , Kenis P. J. , Lu Y. 2010 Nano Lett. 10 1886 -    DOI : 10.1021/nl100675p
Balandin A. A. , Fonoberov V. A. 2005 J. Biomed. Nano Technol. 1 90 -    DOI : 10.1166/jbn.2005.005
Dickerson M. B. , Sandhage K. H. , Naik R. R. 2008 Chem. Rev. 108 4935 -    DOI : 10.1021/cr8002328
Wan Y. , Zuo G. , Liu C. , Li X. , He F. , Ren K. , Luo H. 2010 Polym. Adv. Tech. 22 2659 -
Geng B. , Zhan F. , Jiang H. , Guo Y. , Xing Z. 2008 Chem. Commun. 44 5773 -
He H. , Gao C. 2010 ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 2 3201 -    DOI : 10.1021/am100673g
Morel A. L. , Nikitenko S. I. , Gionnet K. , Wattiaux A. , Lai-Kee- Him J. , Labrugere C , Chevalier B , Deleris G. , Petibois C. , Brisson A. , Simonoff M. 2008 ACS Nano 2 847 -    DOI : 10.1021/nn800091q
Santolalla C. , Alvarez-Ramirez J. , Antonio de los Reyes-Heredia J. , Chavez J. 2013 Ind Eng Chem Res    DOI : 10.1021/ie303069y
Pourjavadi A. , Soleyman R. 2011 J. Nanopart. Res. 13 4647 -    DOI : 10.1007/s11051-011-0428-6
Neupane M. P. , Lee S. J. , Park I. S. , Lee M. H. , Bae T. S. , Kuboki K. , Uo M. , Watari F. J. 2011 Nanopart. Res. 13 491 -    DOI : 10.1007/s11051-010-9971-9