Computational Study on Spirocyclic Compounds as Energetic Materials (I)
Computational Study on Spirocyclic Compounds as Energetic Materials (I)
Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society. 2014. Apr, 35(4): 989-993
Copyright © 2014, Korea Chemical Society
  • Received : September 23, 2013
  • Accepted : November 17, 2013
  • Published : April 20, 2014
Export by style
Cited by
About the Authors
Won K., Seok

The molecular structures of 2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane ( 1 ) and its dinitro derivative, 2,6-dinitro-2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane ( 2 ), were fully optimized without symmetry constraints at HF/6-31G* level of theory. A bisected conformation with respect to the ring is preferred with a C 2 symmetric structure. The density of each molecule in the crystalline state was estimated to 1.12 and 2.36 g/cm 3 using PM3/VSTO-3G calculations from the molecular volume. The heat of formation was calculated for two compounds at the CBS-4M level of theory. The detonation parameters were computed using the EXPLO5 software: D = 6282 m/s, P C-J = 127 kbar for compound 1 , D = 7871 m/s, P C-J = 307 kbar for compound 2 , and D = 6975 m/s, P C-J = 170 kbar for 60% compound 2 with 40% TNT. Specific impulse of compound 1 in aluminized formulation when used as monopropellants was very similar to that of the conventional ammonium perchlorate in the same formulation of aluminum.
With the advent of computational capabilities, accurate models and simulations of high-energetic, dense materials (HEDMs) have been continuously pursued. 1 Theoretical approach can be taken to evaluate proposed compounds before undertaking a possibly costly and difficult synthesis. Although there are some successful results on HEDMs that can yield large quantities of energy on dissociation or combustion, the development of new energetic models still continues to be the focus of many researches. Among them, nitrogen-rich compounds containing fewer carbon atoms show better energetic capabilities, because they produce large enthalpies of formation, a positive oxygen balance, and large volumes of environmentally friendly N 2 molecule on decomposing. 2
Since the existence of the highly strained―ring hydrocarbon such as spiropentane was firmly established in the mid-1940s, a number of synthetic routes to its derivatives and related compounds have been developed. 3 Because of highly distorted properties in these compounds, full safety precautions should always be taken in handling them due to their potentially explosive nature. Therefore, it might not be surprising to consider nitrogen-rich compounds with ring strain as explosives. 4 However, they need to contain high thermal and mechanistic stabilities, while at the same time satisfying the increasing demand for higher outcome. In many cases, high performance and low sensitivity appear to be mutually exclusive, that is why many high performing materials are not stable enough to find practical use and many materials with the desired sensitivity do not possess the performance requirements of a material to replace a commonly-used explosive. 5 So far one of the most promising heterocyclic backbones with high-performing energetics is the tetrazole ring compounds. 6
It has been well known that hydrazine and its diamino and methyl derivative, tetrazane and monomethylhydrazine (MMH), are useful as a solid rocket motor due to the great amount of enthalpies of formation and proton affinities. 7 Study also showed that the major use of dinitrogen tetraoxide (NTO) was a self-igniting molecule. 8 So far the mixture is currently used in liquid―fueled rockets.
Therefore, it will be possible to design new solid rocket propellants by combining highly strained nitrogen-rich ring system with the characteristic of dinitrogen tetraoxide and hydrazine analogue within a molecule. In the present study, we evaluate and predict the suitability of 2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7- tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane and its dinitro-substituted compound, 2,6-dinitro-2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane, as potential energetic materials using a theoretical method. The structures, energetic properties, detonation and combustion parameters of the compounds will be presented. We will also demonstrate that these models may be promising candidates as new energetic materials based on relatively small molecules.
Results and Discussions
Using the Gaussian G03W (revision B.03) program package, all calculations for structures and energies were performed. 9-13 In order to obtain accurate enthalpies and free energies, we applied the complete basis set (CBS) method of Petterson and coworkers. With a HF/3-21G(d) structure optimization, CBS-4 begins by computing the zero pont energy, it then uses a large basis set SCF calculation as a base energy, and a MP2/6-31+G calculation with a CBS extrapolation to correct the energy through second order. To approximate higher order contributions, a MP4(SDQ)/6-31+(d,p) calculation is employed. Here we applied the modified CBS―4M method (M refers minimal population localization) including some additional empirical corrections. 14,15 To estimate the highest possible density in the crystalline state of the model compounds, semi-empirical PM3/VSTO―3G calculation by scaling the computed molecular volume is used. 16
The detonation parameters were calculated using a EXPLO5 (version 5.04) computer program. 17-20 The program is based on the chemical equilibrium, steady-state model of detonation. The calculation of the equilibrium composition of the detonation products is done by applying modified White, Johnson and Dantzig’s free energy minimization technique. The program is designed to enable the calculation of detonation parameters at the Chapman-Jouguet ( C-J ) point.
Based on assumptions (i) the constant pressure in the combustion chamber and the chamber cross-section area, (ii) the applicable energy and momentum conservation equations, (iii) the zero velocity of the combustion products at the combustion chamber, (iv) no temperature and velocity lag between condensed and gaseous species, (v) the isoentropic expansion in the nozzle, the theoretical rocket performances were calculated. Using the EXPLO5 software, the combustion calculations were carried out under isobaric conditions.
Structures. Because of the existence of a spiro carbon atom, a bisected conformation is preferred with respect to the ring. The molecular structures of CH 2 N 2 O 4 and its dinitro compound, CN 4 O 8 , were fully optimized without symmetry constraints at HF/6-31G * level of theory to give a C 2 symmetry (Fig. 1 ). The tetrahedral carbon representing the spiro-centre has external bond angle with mean value of 117.7° and internal one is found to be 93.9° These values are far from the perfect tetrahedron, due to the fact that the carbon is included into a less flexible and more strained ring. 21 The average bond angle of C-O-N or O-N-O linkage in the ring is within the range of 88.21-89.13°. For CH 2 N2O 4 molecule, the mean C―O distance is 1.406 Å and the average O-N distance is 1.505 Å. Each four-membered ring against a spiro carbon center is not virtually planar with deviation of 4.245° from the plane defined by the O1, N2, O3, and C4 atoms. The C―O distance is a little shorter by comparing with that of the 1,3-dioxetane and 1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]pentane (1.420 Å). For CN 4 O 8 molecule, with the presence of a spiro center at C4 atom, the average C―O distance and the ON one is 1.411 Å and 1.486 Å. The four-membered ring made by C, O, N, and O atom of CN 4 O 8 molecule is more deviated from the planarity than CH 2 N 2 O 4 one by 0.928°.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Optimized molecular structure for (a) 2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7- tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane (CH2N2O4) and (b) 2,6-dinitro-2,6-diaza- 1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane (CN4O8).
Energetic Properties. The enthalpy of formation of a gasphase molecule was computed according to the atomization energy method .22-24 In Eq. (1), Δ f H °(g, CH 2 N 2 O 4 ) stands for the gas-phase enthalpy of formation of CH 2 N 2 O 4 , H(CH 2 N 2 O 4 ) represents the CBS-4M calculated enthalpy of CH 2 N 2 O 4 , Σ H 0 denotes the CBS-4M calculated enthalpies for the individual atoms, and ΣΔ f H 0 indicates the experimentally reported literature values for the enthalpies of formation for the corresponding atoms, Δ f H °. 24
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Using computed data and the values in literature, the gas phase enthalpy of formation of 2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane (CH 2 N 2 O 4 ) can be calculated to Δ H f ° (g, CH 2 N 2 O 4 ) = +27.8 kcal/mol. The enthalpy of formation of the gas-phase 2,6-dinitro-2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]- heptane (CN 4 O 8 ) was also computed following the same procedure and can be obtained: Δ H f ° (g, CN 4 O 8 ) = +9.5 kcal.
The melting point of 2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]- heptane was taken to be equal to that of 1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane (44 ℃), which was available in the literature. 25 Considering a close melting point of piperidine and cyclohexane replacing CH 2 by NH, it is not unreasonable for CH 2 N 2 O 4 and C 3 H 4 O 4 results in a similar one. The enthalpy of sublimation for CH 2 N 2 O 4 was estimated according to Trouton’s rule, Δ Hsub =188 Tm , and the validity of the rule reflects the fact that the entropy of vaporization is approximately constant for many compounds and that Δ Hsub ≈ Δ Hvap + Δ Hfusion , with Δ H vap >> Δ Hfusion so that Δ Hsub ≈ Δ Hvap . 26
With the estimated sublimation enthalpy, the enthalpy of formation for solid 2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane can be calculated to Δ H f ° ( s , CH 2 N 2 O 4 ) = +88.8 kJ/mol, then Δ U f °( s , CH 2 N 2 O 4 ) = +78.9 kJ/mol using the correlation Um = Hm − nRT. 27 Same procedure was applied to get Δ H f ° ( s , CN 4 O 8 ) and Δ U f°( s , CN 4 O 8 ) for 2,6-dinitro-2,6-diaza- 1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane, which result in +12.2 kJ/ mol and +26.3 kJ/mol. The maximum density of each CH 2 N 2 O 4 and CN 4 O 8 in the crystalline state was estimated to 1.12 g/ cm 3 and 2.36 g/cm 3 using PM3/VSTO-3G calculations from the molecular volume ( Vmax ). 16
Detonation Parameters. With the heat of formations obtained in an extensive computational study and by using the EXPLO5 software, the detonation parameters of CH 2 N 2 O 4 and its dinitro compound, CN 4 O 8 , were calculated. Although the model compounds have a positive oxygen balance, Table1 shows that detonation temperature and heat of detonation for CH 2 N 2 O 4 are comparable to the conventional explosive 1,3,5-trinitrohexahydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) with slightly negative oxygen balance.
Detonation parameters for 2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro- [3,3]heptane (CH2N2O4) and 2,6-dinitro-2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane (CN4O8) depending on Its densitya
PPT Slide
Lager Image
a𝜌 = density, Ω = oxygen balance, Qv = heat of detonation, Tex = detonation temperature, PC-J = detonation pressure, D = detonation velocity, V0 = volume of detonation gases, RDX = 1,3,5-trinitrohexahydro-1,3,5-triazine.
It also shows performance characteristics with a predicted detonation velocity of 6282 m/s and a predicted detonation pressure of 127 kbar, both of which are lower than for RDX (8868 m/s, 337 kbar). Because of suffering from a low density, it results in a poor performance. However, CH 2 N 2 O 4 and CN 4 O 8 molecules are similar to RDX in volume of detonation gases. For CN 4 O 8 , detonation pressure and velocity which are two important performance parameters for an energetic material are close to RDX. However, detonation temperature and heat of detonation are far lower to RDX.
Based on the existence of vibrationally stable minimum on the potential energy hypersurface and considering the lowest energy isomer, computed molecular volumes was obtained using semi-empirical PM3/VSTO-3G calculations. It is well established that the computed molecular densities correlate well with the highest observed experimental densities. 16 As shown in Table 1 , CN 4 O 8 is higher density molecule than RDX. Predicted heat of detonation and detonation temperature of CN 4 O 8 are much lower than RDX, however, those values of CH 2 N 2 O 4 comparable to RDX. Previous studies using H 3 N 3 O 3 model showed that values of detonation pressure, detonation velocity and volume of detonation are higher than CH 2 N 2 O 4 and CN 4 O 8 , although the density is 1.60 g/cm 3 . 28
In this regard, CN 4 O 8 compound would be a good candidate as an explosive with reasonable detonation pressure and velocity. It will be worth to point out that the nitro group in nitro-substituted spiro compound not only allows a molecule to self-oxidize, but it can also react to make elemental nitrogen, liberating energy as it does so. However, the increased nitro content of a parent molecule increases its enthalpy of combustion or decomposition on a molar basis but not on a gram basis; that is, the mass of the poly-nitro compound increases proportionately faster than its enthalpy of reaction. 29
Because CN 4 O 8 compound is also an oxidizer with the positive oxygen balance, the value should be close to zero by using a negative oxygen balance material to be an explosive. Explosive trinitrotoluene (TNT) has an oxygen balance of ca . −74%, accordingly it needs an oxidizer. Table 2 shows that detonation parameters for the neat 2,6-dinitro-2,6-diaza- 1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane (CN 4 O 8 ) with TNT formulations in which the TNT content has been varied in order to achieve optimal performance
Detonation parameters for 2,6-dinitro-2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7- tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane (CN4O8) and a Formulation with TNT
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Detonation parameters for 2,6-dinitro-2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7- tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane (CN4O8) and a Formulation with TNT
The increased TNT content of a parent molecule increases its detonation pressure and velocity, but decreases detonation volume proportionately. A formulation of 40% TNT stands for better predicted detonation parameters with the detonation pressure of 170 kbar, the detonation velocity of 6975 m/s, and the detonation volume of 713 L/kg. As shown in Table 1 , 6:4 ratio of CN 4 O 8 and TNT is quite similar to RDX in the values of an oxygen balance and a predicted heat of detonation. However, the performance data for RDX are out of reach. The calculated detonation velocities of all compounds in TNT formulations are in the range of 104 and 170 m/s and are well below the commonly used explosive RDX (337 m/s). Usually a good oxygen balance results in more negative heat of detonation and therefore leads to a better performance of the explosive. It is unexpected that CN 4 O 8 compound can perform as RDX. Table 2 also shows that a predicted density increases by adding TNT content of a parent molecule and calculated detonation temperature and heat of CN 4 O 8 in TNT formulations are coming and going.
Combustion Parameters. For a solid rocket propellant, the combustion products into space (or atmosphere) is freely expanded at constant pressure, as one can assume. Therefore, the combustion proceeds as isobaric, of which Δ U = Qp pΔV is a good approximation. 30 In this study, we assumed firing the rocket motor against ambient atmosphere as it is commonly the case for tactical missiles
From the analysis of the expansion of the combustion products through the nozzle, the theoretical characteristics of the rocket motor propellant may be derived. The parameters in the combustion chamber and the isoentropic expansion through the nozzle should be obtained in the calculation of the theoretical rocket performance. The options that composition of combustion products remains unchanged and is in instantaneous chemical equilibrium during the expansion through the nozzle are provided by the EXPLO5 code. 17
Combustion properties (solid rocket motor) of Neat 2,6- diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane (CH2N2O4) and a formulation with 30% Al (frozen expansion)a
PPT Slide
Lager Image
aΩ = oxygen balance, QP = heat of isobaric combustion, Tcomb = combustion temperature, Isp * = specific impulse
Table 3 summarized the combustion parameter of the neat propellants covalent CH 2 N 2 O 4 used as monopropellants and for aluminized formulations assuming rocket propellant conditions (isobaric conditions with a chamber pressure of 70 bar), in which the aluminum content has been varied in order to achieve optimal performance and compare the corresponding values for a conventional AP/Al formulation. The formulations of CH 2 N 2 O 4 with Al give better performance than the neat propellant and have generally higher combustion temperature
The results also show that a formulation of 30% Al gives optimal performance from the comparison of the same formulation of AP/Al. The change of the impulse per propellant mass unit is described as the specific impulse Isp * , which is an important parameter for the characterization of rocket propellants and can be interpreted as the effective exhaust velocity of the combustion gases when exiting the expansion nozzle. The specific impulse and heat of isobaric combustion of the same formulation of covalent CH 2 N 2 O 4 with Al are slightly lower than those of the AP/Al formulation. The specific impulse of 80% H 3 N 3 O 3 and 20% Al formuation is much higher than that of the 70%/30% of CH 2 N 2 O 4 /Al. 28 A 30% Al formulation mixture may be the most promising candidate as environmentally benign oxidizer to be used in solid rocket motors. 31 Typical values for the specific impulse of solid boosters are 250 s, whereas for bipropellants they are found at approx. 450 s. 30 In that regards, a 70% CH 2 N 2 O 4 and 30% Al mixture may be useful as solid rocket motors. Monopropellants are endothermic liquids, which decompose exothermically in the absence of oxygen. They possess a relatively small energy content and are only used in small missiles and small satellites ( Isp * (hydrazine) = 186 s). To be solid rocket motors, they should be chlorine or perchlorate-free, close to 2.0 g/cm 3 in density, low vapor pressure, and less sensitive than PETN (pentaerythritol tetranitrate). Therefore, our results indicate that a formulation of 30% Al might be the promising candidate for solid rocket motors.
From this theoretical study on 2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[ 3,3]heptane and 2,6-dinitro-2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspirotetraoxaspiro[ 3,3]heptane, it can be concluded: (i) the suggested 2,6- diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane molecule shows comparable detonation parameters to RDX. (ii) formulation of 60% 2,6-dinitro-2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]heptane with 40% TNT gives the best results as explosives. (iii) the specific impulse of the chlorine and perchlorate-free formulation of 70% of 2,6-diaza-1,3,5,7-tetraoxaspiro[3,3]- heptane with 30% of aluminum shows similar calculated performances to those of the conventional AP/Al formulation. All the results obtained should encourage synthetic works to prepare on a laboratory scale and to evaluate their properties experimentally, first and foremost their thermal stability.
The author acknowledges Dr. Muhamed Suaeeska (Brodarski Institute, Croatia) in the development of new computational codes to predict the detonation and propulsion parameters of novel explosives and is indebted to Prof. Dr. T. M. Klapötke (Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich, Energetic Materials Research, Department of Chemistry, Butenandt Str. 5-13, D-81377, Germany) for many helpful and inspiring discussions and supports of this work.
Rice B. M. , Byrd E. F. C. , Mattson W. D. 2007 Computational Aspects of Nitrogen-Rich HEDMs. In High Energy Density Materials; Klapátke, T. M., Ed. Structure and Bonding 125 153 - 104
Bumpus J. A. 2012 Advances in Physical Chemistry 2012 175146 -
Mondal T. , Sarutha B. , Ghanta S. , Roy T. K. , Mahapatra S. , Prasad M. D. 2009 J. Mol. Struct.-Theochem 897 42 -
Fischer N. , Izsak D. , Klapátke T. M. , Rappenglück S. , Stierstorfer Járg. 2013 Chem. Eur. J. 18 4051 -
Greenwood N. N. , Earnshow A. 1984 Chemistry of the Elements Pergamon Press Oxford
Ball D. W. 2006 J. Mol. Struct.-Theochem 773 1 -
Frish J. , Trucks G. W. , Schlegel H. B. , Scuseria G. E. , Robb M. A. , Cheeseman J. R. , Montgomery J. A. , Vreven T. , Kudin K. N. , Burant J. C. , Millam J. M. , Iyengar S. S. , Tomasi J. , Barone V. , Mennucci B. , Cossi M. , Scalmani G. , Rega N. , Petersson G. A. , Nakatsuji H. , Hada M. , Ehara M. , Toyota K. , Fukuda R. , Hasegawa J. , Ishida M. , Nakajima T. , Honda Y. , Kitao O. , Nakai H. , Klene M. , Li X. , Knox J. E. , Hratchian H. P. , Cross J. B. , Adamo C. , Jaramillo J. , Gomperts R. , Stratmann R. E. , Yazyev O. , Austin A. J. , Cammi R. , Pomelli C. , Ochterski J. W. , Ayala P. Y. , Morokuma K. , Voth G. A. , Salvador P. , Dannenberg J. J. , Zakrzewski V. G. , Dapprich S. , Daniels A. D. , Strain M. C. , Farkas O. , Malick D. K. , Rabuck A. D. , Raghavachari K. , Foresman J. B. , Ortiz J. V. , Cui Q. , Baboul A. G. , Clifford S. , Cioslowski J. , Stefanov B. B. , Liu G. , Liashenko A. , Piskorz P. , Komaromi I. , Martin R. L. , Fox D. J. , Keith T. , Al-Laham M. A. , Peng C. Y. , Nanayakkara A. , Challacombe M. , Gill P. M. W. , Johnson B. , Chen W. , Wong M. W. , Gonzalez C. , Pople J. A. 2003 Gaussian 03, Revision A.1 Gaussian, Inc. Pittsburgh PA
Wolinski K. , Hilton J. F. , Pulay P. 1990 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112 8251 -
Dodds J. L. , McWeeny R. , Sadlej A. J. 1980 J. Mol. Phys. 41 1419 -
Ditchfield R. 1974 Mol. Phys. 27 789 -
McWeeny R. 1962 Phys. Rev. 126 1028 -
Ochterski W. D. , Petersson G. A. , Montgomery J. A. 1996 J. Chem. Phys. 104 2598 -
Montgomery J. , Frisch M. J. , Ochterski J. W. , Petersson G. A. 2000 J. Chem. Phys. 112 6532 -
Klapötke T. M. , Ang H.-G. 2001 Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech. 26 221 -
Sućeska M. 2010 EXPLO5 Program Zagreb, Croatia
Sućeska M. 2004 Materials Science Forum 325 465 -
Hobbs M. L. , Baer M. R. ONR 33395-12 Symp. (International) on Detonation 409 -
Curtiss L. A. , Raghavachari K. , Redfern P. C. , Pople J. A. 1997 J. Chem. Phys. 106 1063 -
Byrd E. F. C. , Rice B. M. 2006 J. Phys. Chem. A 110 1005 -
Rice B. M. , Pai V. 1999 J. Combustion and Flame 118 445 -
Westwell M. S. , Searle M. S. , Wales D. J. , Williams D. H. 1995 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 5013 -
Köhler J. , Meyer R. 1998 Explosivstoffe 9th ed. Wiley-VCH Weinheim
Klapötke T. M. , Seok W. K. 2013 Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 34 3189 -
Wagner R. R. , Ball D. W. 2011 J. Undegrad. Chem. Res. 10 134 -
Klapötke T. M. 2011 Chemistry of High-Energy Materials 2nd ed. de Gruyter Berlin, New York
Gökcinar E. , Klapötke T. M. , Kramer M. P. 2010 J. Phys. Chem. A 114 8680 -