Advanced
One-step Microwave Synthesis of Hierarchical Structured LiFePO<sub>4</sub> using Citric Acid
One-step Microwave Synthesis of Hierarchical Structured LiFePO4 using Citric Acid
Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society. 2014. Oct, 35(10): 2901-2905
Copyright © 2014, Korea Chemical Society
  • Received : March 03, 2014
  • Accepted : June 03, 2014
  • Published : October 20, 2014
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Mihye Wu
Sungho Choi
Yongku Kang
Ha-Kyun Jung

Abstract
The hierarchical-structured LiFePO 4 cathode materials were synthesized by one-step microwave synthesis, and their electrochemical properties were investigated. Addition of citric acid during the reaction lead to the formation of hierarchical structured LiFePO 4 , which has both nano- and micron-characteristics advantageous for energy density and electrode fabrication. Adjusting the molar ratio of Fe to citric acid enhanced the electrochemical properties of LiFePO 4 .
Keywords
Introduction
There are diverse approaches used in preparing electrode materials ( e.g. , solid-state, sol-gel, co-precipitation, solvothermal, hydrothermal method). 1-8 The electrochemical properties of materials are highly dependent on their method of preparation, so adjusting synthesis methods to be more effective is essential in synthesizing cathode materials. 9 Microwave synthesis has been widely adopted as a useful method for preparing electrode materials. The synthetic route is simple and fast, which is economically and environmentally advantageous, and uniformity can be achieved due to reaction processes occurring at the molecular level. 10-13
LiFePO 4 has been intensively studied as a potential cathode material because of advantages that include excellent thermal stability, good cycleability, low cost, nontoxicity and safety. 14-17 However, one of the main problems with LiFePO 4 is that the compound has poor ionic and electrical conductivity. 18-20 Many efforts have been made to overcome this problem, and reducing the particle size to nano-scale is accepted as being one of the most effective ways to improve the ionic and electrical conductivity of the electrode material. Nano-structuring can facilitate lithiumion diffusion in the electrode materials by shortening the diffusion lengths for lithium ions. 21 The electrical conductivity of nano-structured materials can be effectively enhanced by providing short path-lengths for electronic transport. 22 Moreover, greater contact area increases the accessibility of electrolyte, leading to high power performance. 23
Despite these advantages based on the nano-structuring, there are still disadvantages. Nano-sized materials show lower density comparing with micron-sized materials, which leads to lower energy density of the electrode, and limits the total volumetric energy density of lithium-ion batteries. To enhance the strength and make up for the weakness, some solutions ( i.e. , fabricating nano/nano-mixed or nano/micro-mixed electrode materials) have been suggested.
In this work, we successively synthesized hierarchical structured LiFePO 4 , composed of micron-sized particles formed by the nano-sized primary particles by one-step microwave synthesis using citric acid. The hierarchical structuring enables the electrode material to have both nanoand micron-characteristics. Nano-sized primary particles of LiFePO 4 can be kinetically and thermodynamically favorable; while micron-sized particles can increase the pack density so that the total volumetric energy density of lithiumion batteries can be increased. The effect of citric acid on synthesizing hierarchical structured LiFePO 4 and the electrochemical performance of the material was investigated.
Experimental
Preparation of LiFePO4. LiFePO 4 was prepared by a one-step microwave synthesis using lithium acetate dihydrate (Sigma-Aldrich, reagent grade), iron(II) sulfate heptahydrate (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.0%), ammonium phosphate monobasic (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.99%), sucrose (Fluka, 99.0%), methacrylic acid (Aldrich, 99.0%) and citric acid monohydrate (DAE JUNG chemicals, 99.5%) as raw materials. All the chemicals were used without further purification.The molar ratio of the Li:Fe:P was 3:1:2. The proper amount of sucrose and methacrylic acid was 15 and 30 wt % of the calculated final product, respectively. The molar ratios of Fe to citric acid were 1:0, 1:0.8, 1:1, 1:1.2, 1:1.4, and 1:1.6. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) with a molecular weight of 10,000 was dissolved in deionized water resulting in a 25% w/w solution. This solution was then added to the appropriately weighed raw materials. The resultant mixture was transferred and sealed in a Teflon vessel; then placed in a microwave reactor (Model MARS6, CEM Corp., USA). The reaction temperature was raised to 170 °C, maintained for 15 min; then cooled down to room temperature.
Measurements. The crystal structures were analyzed with a powder diffractometer (Rigaku Ultima IV Diffractometer) with graphite-monochromator equipped with Cu Kα radiation; operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. The particle size and morphology were observed using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Tescan Mira 3 LMU FEG, 20 kV).
The cathode was formulated by mixing LiFePO 4 powder, super P, and PVdF in a weight ratio of 7:2:1; dispersed in N -methylpyrrolidone (NMP). The obtained slurry was spread on Al foil as a current collector, followed by vacuum drying at 120 °C for 12 h. The electrolyte was 1 M LiPF 6 dissolved in a mixture of ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate (EC/DMC 1:1, v/v). Li foil was used as a negative electrode, and coin cells (CR2032 type) were assembled in an argon-filled glove box.
Galvanostatic charge/discharge characteristics were measured between 1.5 and 4.5 V at a constant current of 0.1C (17 mA/g) and 1C (170 mA/g). The galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) was employed at a current pulse of 17 mAh/g for 10 min. The current was turned off for 50 min between each pulse. 24
The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area was measured by nitrogen adsorption/desorption at 77.3 K. Before measurement, all the samples were degassed for 30 min at 90 °C, and evacuated for 4 h at 200 °C.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out using an impedance analyzer (Bio-Logic) with a frequency range from 10 5 to 0.1 Hz at an amplitude of 10 mV. The impedance spectra were normalized by the active mass of the electrode. 25,26
Results and Discussion
The XRD patterns for the LiFePO 4 synthesized with various ratios of Fe to citric acid are shown in Figure 1 . The experimental molar ratios of Fe to citric acid were 1:0, 1:0.8, 1:1, 1:1.2, 1:1.4 and 1:1.6, and we refer to products from these ratios as LiFePO 4 /CAX, where X represents the molar ratio of citric acid to Fe. As indicated all the patterns except LiFePO 4 /CA0 were indexed on the orthorhombic structure with space group Pnma (JCPDS 97-018-1341), and LiFePO 4 /CA0 with Pmnb (JCPDS 00-042-1499). The synthesized LiFePO 4 was well crystallized without any detectable impurity phases despite using citric acid in the one-step microwave reaction.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
XRD patterns for the LiFePO4 synthesized with various ratios of Fe to citric acid.
Figure 2 shows charge and discharge profiles of LiFePO 4 /CA1.2. The long flat charge and discharge curves were obtained at a potential of about 3.4 V vs . Li/Li + at 0.1C (17 mA/g), which is related to the two phase redox reaction (LiFePO 4 ↔ (1− x )LiFePO 4 + x FePO 4 + x Li + + x e ). 27 The synthesized LiFePO 4 /CA1.2 had a discharge capacity of 170 mAh/g, same as its theoretical capacity based on a oneelectron reaction. 28 This result shows that the reactivity of the participating lithium ions was very high, and the electrons for the redox reaction were very active. This follows from the fact that the electrochemical reaction of the synthesized LiFePO 4 was highly reversible.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Charge and discharge profiles of LiFePO4/CA1.2 at 0.1C (17 mAh/g).
Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images of LiFePO 4 are shown in Figure 3 . Figure 3(a) reveals that LiFePO 4 /CA0 synthesized without citric acid has thickrod morphology several microns in size; without formation of hierarchical structure. However, the particle morphology changed significantly after adding citric acid for the microwave reaction. Regardless of the molar ratios of Fe to citric acid, all the particles synthesized with citric acid show hierarchical-structure morphology with primary particles of nanorods with a diameter of 20 nm and length of under 400 nm ( Figure 3(c) , (e) , (g) , (i) , (k) ), and hierarchical particles of spherical shape with a diameter of several microns ( Figure 3(b) , (d) , (f) , (h) , (j) ). Moreover, the size of primary particles varies with the molar ratios of Fe to citric acid. The size of nonorods increased with increasing citric acid content. The length of nanorods for LiFePO 4 /CA0.8 is ranging from 50 to 200 nm, whereas that for LiFePO 4 /CA1.6 is from 200 to 400 nm, which was grown much longer as the citric acid content increased. The variation in primary particle size influences the diffusion length of lithium ion that can affect the performances of the electrode materials. To investigate the differences of the synthesized LiFePO 4 according to the primary particle size, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) techniques were employed. The calculated surface areas were listed in Table 1 . A remarkable decrease in the BET surface area was measured for LiFePO 4 /CA0 compared with other products prepared by adding citric acid. The BET surface area of LiFePO 4 /CA1.2 was 23.17 m 2 /g which was about 12 times higher than that of LiFePO 4 /CA0, 1.96 m 2 /g. This shows that the greater surface area originated in the hierarchical-structure morphology with primary particles of nanorods. In addition, there were differences in surface area of citric acid added products in accordance with primary particle size. The LiFePO 4 /CA1.2 exhibited the highest surface area among other products. Therefore, it is obvious that citric acid addition played a key role in the formation of the hierarchical structure of LiFePO 4 , and the optimum molar ratio of Fe to citric acid for the highest surface area was 1:1.2.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
FE-SEM images of LiFePO4: (a) LiFePO4/CA0; (b, c) LiFePO4/CA0.8; (d, e) LiFePO4/CA1; (f, g) LiFePO4/CA1.2; (h, i) LiFePO4/CA1.4; (j, k) LiFePO4/CA1.6.
BET surface area
PPT Slide
Lager Image
BET surface area
The nano-sized primary particles can provide advantageous electrochemical factors such as shortening the diffusion and electron transport paths, good electrolyte accessibility, increasing reaction sites, and improving cycling performance. The mi cron characteristics of the particles can offer solutions for low volumetric energy density and electrode fabrication problems. To identify the electrochemical properties in respect of morphologies and surface areas, the charge and discharge curves of LiFePO 4 synthesized with different molar ratios of Fe to citric acid at 1C are depicted in Figure 4(a) . There are noticeable differences of capacity according to the citric acid addition. The discharge capacity of LiFePO 4 /CA0 was 11 mAh/g, whereas the citric acid added materials showed 100, 107, 121, 106 and 95 mAh/g for LiFePO 4 /CA0.8, LiFePO 4 /CA1, LiFePO 4 /CA1.2, LiFePO 4 /CA1.4, and LiFePO 4 /CA1.6, respectively. This dependence of capacity on the inclusion of citric acid is consistent with the FESEM and BET results. LiFePO 4 /CA0 has only micron characteristics; while the others have not only micron characteristics in their hierarchical morphologies, but also nano characteristics in their primary morphologies. Therefore, it is evident that LiFePO 4 products with citric acid show higher discharge capacity than those synthesized without citric acid. Also, LiFePO 4 /CA1.2 exhibits charge and discharge capacities of 124 and 121 mAh/g; which is the optimum condition for this material preparation that having highest surface area of those synthesized LiFePO 4 . Figure 4(b) shows the cycling performance and coulombic efficiency of LiFePO 4 /CA1.2 at 1C. As can be seen, the LiFePO 4 exhibits a very stable cycling performance with capacity retention of 98% and coulombic efficiency of 99%; after 50 cycles.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
(a) Charge and discharge curves of LiFePO4 synthesized with different molar ratios of Fe to citric acid at 1C, and (b) cycleability and coulombic efficiency of LiFePO4/CA1.2.
To clarify the electrochemical differences of the synthesized products under minimized kinetic effect, QOCV profiles were obtained by the galvanostatic, intermittent-titration technique (GITT). 29,30 The technique was carried out by applying a current pulse for 10 min to the cells to reach the closed-circuit voltage (CCV); followed by a relaxation step of 50 min so that the voltage reached a quasi-equilibrium value (quasi-open-circuit voltage, QOCV - see Figure 5(a) ). 31,32 Charging and discharging was continued until the potential of the cell was charged to 4.5 V and discharged to 1.5 V, respectively. Figure 5(b) shows QOCV profiles as a function of the discharge capacity; showing hysteresis at the start and end of the discharge region associated with the citric acid content. At the same QOCV, the various LiFePO 4 products exhibited different discharge capacity; indicating that the electrochemical reaction process is different from the citric content. LiFePO 4 /CA1.2 showed the highest discharge capacity at the same QOCV, LiFePO 4 /CA0 showed the lowest, and others follows the same tendency toward specific capacity at 1C presented in Figure 4 . Therefore, it can be inferred that LiFePO 4 /CA1.2 is the most favorable thermodynamically, and that LiFePO 4 /CA0 is least favorable; compared to all the others.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
(a) Typical voltage transient in the discharging period and (b) QOCV profiles as a function of discharging capacity.
To demonstrate the influence of citric acid addition on kinetics, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used. The EIS measurement provides information about the internal resistance of electrochemical systems. Nyquist plots of LiFePO 4 at different molar ratios of Fe to citric acid are shown in Figure 6 , and the fitting results are listed in Table 2 . The R Ω is the total ohmic resistance of the cell; comprising electric conductivity of the electrolyte, separator, and electrodes. The R ct represents the faradic charge-transfer resistance for the electrode reaction; that shows the reaction kinetics. 33 As listed in Table 2 , R Ω is invariant regardless of citric acid ratios. The R ct ; however, showed noticeable differences according to the citric acid ratios. Most significantly, LiFePO 4 /CA0 showed the highest R ct among those synthesized by adding citric acid; a value which was about seven times higher than LiFePO 4 /CA1.2 (lowest R ct ). From this, it can be deduced that the improved electrochemical properties of LiFePO 4 /CA1.2 originated from its low R ct .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Nyquist plots of LiFePO4 at different molar ratios of Fe to citric acid.
EIS parameters of LiFePO4
PPT Slide
Lager Image
EIS parameters of LiFePO4
Conclusion
In summary, hierarchical-structured LiFePO 4 as a cathode material was fabricated by one-step microwave synthesis. Adding citric acid is essential in the formation of hierarchical structures, which provide advantages for volumetric energy density and electrode fabrication. The optimum molar ratio of Fe to citric acid for the highest surface area was 1:1.2. The LiFePO 4 showed discharge capacity of 170 mAh/g at 0.1C (same as theoretical capacity), and 120 mAh/g at 1C.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by grants from the Fundamental R&D Program for Core Technology of Materials by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy, and the Government-Funded General Research & Development Program by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea.
References
Andersson A. S. , Kalska B. , Häggström L. , Thomas J. O. 2000 Solid State Ionics 130 41 -    DOI : 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00311-8
Prosini P. P. , Carewska M. , Scaccia S. , Wisniewski P. , Pasquali M. 2003 Electrochim. Acta 48 4205 -    DOI : 10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00606-6
Arnold G. , Garche J. , Hemmer R. , Ströbele S. , Vogler C. , Wohlfahrt-Mehrens M. 2003 J. Power Sources 119 247 -
Yang H. , Wu X.-L. , Cao M.-H. , Guo Y.-G. 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C 113 3345 -    DOI : 10.1021/jp808080t
Yang S. , Zhou X. , Zhang J. , Liu Z. 2010 J. Mater. Chem. 20 8086 -    DOI : 10.1039/c0jm01346c
Ellis B. , Kan W. H. , Makahnouk W. R. M. , Nazar L. F. 2007 J. Mater. Chem. 17 3248 -    DOI : 10.1039/b705443m
Liu H. , Wu Y. P. , Rahm E. , Holze R. , Wu H. Q. 2004 J. Solid State Eletrochem. 8 450 -    DOI : 10.1007/s10008-004-0521-1
Dokko K. , Koizumi S. , Nakanob H. , Kanamura K. 2007 J. Mater. Chem. 17 4803 -    DOI : 10.1039/b711521k
Yang G. , Ji H. , Liu H. , Huo K. , Fu J. , Chu P. K. 2010 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 10 980 -    DOI : 10.1166/jnn.2010.1890
Wang L. , Huang Y. , Jiang R. , Jia D. 2007 Electrochim. Acta 52 6778 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.104
Song M.-S. , Kim D.-Y. , Kang Y.-M. , Kim Y.-I. , Lee J.-Y. , Kwon H.-S. 2008 J. Power Sources 180 546 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.01.079
Bilecka I. , Niederberger M. 2010 Nanoscale 2 1358 -    DOI : 10.1039/b9nr00377k
Zhang Y. , Feng H. , Wu X. , Wang L. , Zhang A. , Xia T. , Dong H. , Liu M. 2009 Electrochim. Acta 54 3206 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.11.033
Li Z. , Zhang D. , Yang F. 2009 J. Mater. Sci. 44 2435 -    DOI : 10.1007/s10853-009-3316-z
Chen Z. , Zhu H. , Ji S. , Fakir R. , Linkov V. 2008 Solid State Ionics 179 1810 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.04.018
Guo H. , Xiang K. , Cao X. , Li X. , Wang Z. , Li L. 2009 Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 19 166 -    DOI : 10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60246-0
Zhou W. , He W. , Li Z. , Zhao H. , Yan S. 2009 J. Solid State Electrochem. 13 1819 -    DOI : 10.1007/s10008-008-0762-5
Hsu K.-F. , Tsay S.-Y. , Hwang B.-J. 2004 J. Mater. Chem. 14 2690 -    DOI : 10.1039/b406774f
Kim J.-K. , Choi, J.-W., Chauhan G. S. , Ahn J.-H. , Hwang G.-C. , Choi J.-B. , Ahn H.-J. 2008 Electrochim. Acta 53 8258 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.06.049
Muraliganth T. , Murugan A. V. , Manthiram A. 2008 J. Mater. Chem. 18 5661 -    DOI : 10.1039/b812165f
Wang Y. , Li H. , He P. , Hosono E. , Zhou H. 2010 Nanoscale 2 1294 -    DOI : 10.1039/c0nr00068j
Aricò A. S. , Bruce P. , Scrosati B. , Tarascon J.-M. , Schalkwijk W. V. 2005 Nature Mater 4 366 -    DOI : 10.1038/nmat1368
Jiang C. , Hosono E. , Zhou H. 2006 Nanotoday 1 28 -
Rui X. H. , Ding N. , Liu J. , Li C. , Chen C. H. 2010 Electrochim. Acta 55 2384 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.11.096
Alcántara R. , Ortiz G. F. , Lavela P. , Tirado J. L. , Jaegermann W. , Thißen A. 2005 J. Electroanal. Chem. 584 147 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.07.011
Chae O. B. , Park S. , Ryu J. H. , Oh S. M. 2013 J. Electrochem. Soc. 160 A11 - 11    DOI : 10.1149/2.071309jes
Yang J. , Xu J. 2004 J. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 7 A515 -    DOI : 10.1149/1.1819893
Yamada A. , Chung S. C. , Hinokuma K. 2001 J. Electrochem. Soc. 148 A224 -    DOI : 10.1149/1.1348257
Arai H. , Okada S. , Sakurai Y. , Yamaki J. 1997 Solid State Ionics 95 275 -    DOI : 10.1016/S0167-2738(96)00598-X
Plashnitsa L. S. , Kobayashi E. , Noguchi Y. , Okada S. , Yamaki J. 2010 J. Electrochem. Soc. 157 A536 -    DOI : 10.1149/1.3298903
Kim J. W. , Ryu J. H. , Lee K. T. , Oh S. M. 2005 J. Power Sources 147 227 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.041
Ryu J. H. , Kim J. W. , Sung Y.-E. , Oh S. M. 2004 Electrochem. Solid- State Lett. 7 A306 -    DOI : 10.1149/1.1792242
Zhang S. S. , Xu K. , Jow T. R. 2004 Electrochim. Acta 49 1057 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.electacta.2003.10.016