Flexible NO<sub>2</sub> gas sensor using multilayer graphene films by chemical vapor deposition
Flexible NO2 gas sensor using multilayer graphene films by chemical vapor deposition
Carbon letters. 2013. Jul, 14(3): 186-189
Copyright ©2013, Korean Carbon Society
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Received : May 31, 2013
  • Accepted : July 12, 2013
  • Published : July 31, 2013
Export by style
Cited by
About the Authors
HongKyw Choi
Dept. of Advanced Device Technology, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 305-333, Korea
Hu Young Jeong
Central Research Facilities and School of Mechanical and Advanced Materials Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 689-798, Korea
Dae-Sik Lee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Daejeon 305-700, Korea
Choon-Gi Choi
Dept. of Advanced Device Technology, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 305-333, Korea
Sung-Yool Choi
Department of Electrical Engineering and Graphene Research Center, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 305-701, Korea

We report a highly sensitive NO 2 gas sensor based on multi-layer graphene (MLG) films synthesized by a chemical vapor deposition method on a microheater-embedded flexible substrate. The MLG could detect low-concentration NO 2 even at sub-ppm (<200 ppb) levels. It also exhibited a high resistance change of ~6% when it was exposed to 1 ppm NO 2 gas at room temperature for 1 min. The exceptionally high sensitivity could be attributed to the large number of NO 2 molecule adsorption sites on the MLG due to its a large surface area and various defect-sites, and to the high mobility of carriers transferred between the MLG films and the adsorbed gas molecules. Although desorption of the NO 2 molecules was slow, it could be enhanced by an additional annealing process using an embedded Au microheater. The outstanding mechanical flexibility of the graphene film ensures the stable sensing response of the device under extreme bending stress. Our large-scale and easily reproducible MLG films can provide a proof-of-concept for future flexible NO 2 gas sensor devices.
1. Introduction
Graphene, a two-dimensional (2D) monoatomic sheet of sp 2 -hybridized carbons, has attracted tremendous interest from academic and industrial researchers due to its unique thermal, mechanical, and electrical properties. These properties hold particular interest for researchers investigating sensors that can be highly sensitive to the adsorption and desorption of molecules [1 - 5] . Accordingly, graphene’s large available surface area makes it a promising candidate for use as a sensor for chemical and biological detection [6 , 7] . Recently, a chemical gas sensor using micromechanically exfoliated single-layer graphene showed exceptionally low detection noise levels at room temperature: its high sensitivity resulted from the extremely high mobility of carriers [8] . Although a high response to gas molecules was achieved in that report, the mass producing and integrating of graphene into a real device remained a challenge to be overcome. With that goal in mind, many researchers have developed high-performance NO 2 gas sensors using reduced graphene oxide sheets, obtained from high temperature annealing [9] or a chemical conversion with hydrazine [10] and ascorbic acid [11] , for application as a low-cost, simple and practical sensor device. More recently, Joshi et al. [12] reported a NO 2 gas sensor based on graphene films and ribbons grown on Ni-coated Si substrates using the microwave plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (MPECVD) method. In spite of the potential advantages of the CVD-grown graphene films for novel gas sensors, their sensitivity and response time was relatively weak and not yet
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Schematic diagrams of the fabrication process for the gas sensor based on chemical vapor deposition (CVD) graphene. (a) SiO2/Si substrate. (b) Ni (300 nm) deposition on SiO2/Si by e-beam evaporation process. (c) multi-layer graphene (MLG) growth on Ni/SiO2/Si using chemical vapor deposition process. (d) Floating graphene on DI-water for rinsing after etching Ni layer using FeCl3. (e) Floating graphene on DI-water for transferring to Au/polyimide substrates. (f ) Transferred MLG on Au/polyimide substrates.
satisfactory for high performance sensing applications.
Here we report the fabrication and characterization of a gas sensing system based on multi-layer graphene (MLG) films synthesized by the CVD method. The gas sensor uses relatively simple fabrication processes and graphene, producing a remarkably improved gas sensing performance which is retained even in an extreme bending state [13] . This was achieved because of the high surface sensitivity of MLG films and their strong mechanical flexibility.
2. Experimental
Fig. 1 schematically shows a procedure for fabricating our flexible NO 2 gas sensor based on CVD graphene films [14 , 15] . An electron-beam evaporator was used to deposit a 300 nm thick Ni layer on a dielectric substrate (SiO 2 /Si). The crystallinity of the Ni layer was controlled by its thickness, annealing, and the nature of the substrate [16] . Then, the Ni/ SiO 2 /Si substrate was heated up to 1000℃ inside a quartz tube under an argon atmosphere, followed by injection of the reaction gas mixture (Ar : H 2 : CH 4 = 500 : 160 : 125 sccm) for a few minutes. While cooling to room temperature, MLG was grown on the Ni substrate with a thickness range of 7 to 15 nm, depending on annealing time, reaction time, gas mixture and cooling rate. To transfer the MLG to an arbitrary substrate, the Ni layer was etched with a FeCl 3 (Iron III chloride) solution [17] . The isolated MLG was rinsed with DI-water several times over 30 min to remove FeCl 3 residue. The rinsed MLG was transferred to Au/polyimide flexible substrates and baked at 60- 90℃ for a few minutes in order to increase the adhesion between the MLG and Au/polyimide substrate. As shown in Fig 1 f , the NO 2 gas sensor device shows mechanical flexibility.
The gas sensing properties of the device were measured using a digital multi-meter (HP 3458A) and a dc power supply (HP E3610A). N 2 /NO 2 gas mixtures at a fixed flow rate of 1000 sccm were introduced into a glass chamber using mass flow controllers, and all data were recorded on a desktop computer. Raman spectra were measured by Raman microscope (CRM 200 Witech, 532 nm laser wavelength). High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images were taken using a JEOL JEM-2100F operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.
3. Result and Discussion
Fig. 2 a shows the schematic illustration of our flexible NO 2 gas sensor based on MLG, which consisted of a polyimide flexible substrate, Au electrodes (1 mm width), a Ni/Cu microheater, and MLG film. The cross-section HRTEM image, shown in Fig. 2 b, clearly confirms the MLG grown with 7-8 layers on Ni metal substrate. Raman spectra of the graphene film as transferred to the surface of an oxidized Si wafer are shown in Fig. 2 d.. Two spectra taken at different positions marked in the optical image of Fig. 2 c indicate that the film mostly consists of a few layers of graphene with a high G to 2D peak ratio. [18 -, 19]
Fig. 3 a shows a typical NO 2 sensor response from the MLG film operated at room temperature. The gas sensitivity (S) was defined as S = ΔR / R 0 , where R 0 is the initial resistance when exposed to pure N 2 , and ΔR is the change in resistance measured in the presence of the N 2 /NO 2 gas mixture. The variation in resistance was measured upon exposure to NO 2 concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 5 ppm in dry nitrogen for 30 min. An initial drop of resistance at the beginning of NO 2 exposure was observed. This can be explained by the hole conduction mechanism induced by an electron-withdrawing oxidizer, such as NO 2 , which has been well reported by Schedin et al. [8] The degree of resistance decrease at 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 ppm was calculated to be 11.5, 15.5, 19.5, 26.3, and 38.7%, respectively.
It is notable that our MLG NO 2 gas sensor exhibited a higher
PPT Slide
Lager Image
(a) A schematic of chemical vapor deposition graphene sensor device. (b) Transmission electron microscopy image of graphene/Ni films (3 nm graphene thickness). (c) Optical microscope image of the graphene (two different color marks with contrast). (d) Raman spectra obtained from two color spot in (c) (532-nm laser wavelength). MLG: multi-layer grapheme.
sensitivity than other graphene-based NO 2 gas sensors [6 , 9 , 10 , 20] . Furthermore, the maximum response of our MLG device to 5 ppm is 38.7%, about 2.7 times higher than the CNTs/reduced graphene hybrid gas sensor previously reported by our group [13] . The exceptional sensitivity achieved here is deeply related to the unique properties of 2D graphene, with its high surface energy and various defect sites, compared to carbon nanotubes. The response curve, as seen in Fig. 3 a, after exposure to NO 2 gas for 30 min, can be divided into two parts; a first rapid response and subsequent slow response. The rapid part can be understood to result from molecular adsorption onto low-energy binding sites, such as sp 2 -bonded carbon, and the slow response is due to molecular interactions with higher-energy binding sites (illustrated in Fig. 3 c), such as vacancies, structural defects, and oxygen functional groups, as has been well explained by Robinson et al. Two different types of binding sites also induce the nonlinear behavior seen as a function of NO 2 concentration (from 0.2 to 5 ppm), shown in the sensing response graph in Fig. 3 b. Clean graphene surfaces respond sensitively to the variation of NO 2 concentration, while defect sites react slowly to NO 2 concentration. The higher energy binding sites could lead to the enhanced sensing response by providing more binding sites for NO 2 adsorption; however, they could delay recovery due to the high binding force between defect sites and NO 2 molecules, as is clearly shown in the NO 2 -off region of Fig. 3 a.
Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 4 a, when we investigated the variation of resistance of the MLG NO 2 gas sensor at 1 ppm of NO 2 , measured every 1 min, a remarkable resistance response of 5.9% was obtained. However, the desorption of NO 2 at room temperature shows a poor response: the resistance signal is unrecovered from the baseline signal. In addition, the pair of adsorption and desorption curves decrease with increasing NO 2 exposure time. Since a slow recovery is unfavorable for practical sensor devices, an additional process, such as thermal annealing
PPT Slide
Lager Image
(a) Room temperature NO2 sensing behavior of chemical vapor deposition graphene devices at NO2 concentrations from 0.2 to 5 ppm. (b) Resistance response of multi-layer graphene NO2 gas sensor measured after exposure to NO2 at various concentrations for 1 min. (c) Schematic of graphene sheet consisting of sp2-bonded carbon (red dotted mark), structural defects, vacancies, and edge (blue dotted mark) for reaction with NO2 gas.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
(a) Resistance variation in chemical vapor deposition (CVD) graphene sensor to 1 ppm NO2 every 1 min. (b) Resistance variation in CVD graphene sensor to 1 ppm NO2 from 20 to 150℃. (c) Resistance variation in CVD graphene sensor device as a function of bending radius. (d) Resistance variation of flat and bending states to 1 ppm NO2 gas exposure for 3 min.
or Joule heating needs to be introduced. Therefore, we investigated a response that is temperature-dependent at 1 ppm NO 2 , with temperature increasing from room temperature to 150℃. Fig. 4 b shows that the resistance response time at room temperature is faster than at 150℃, whereas the recovery time is slower. Since the thermal treatment removes NO 2 lodged within vacancies, structural defects and oxygen functional groups, it can increase the recovery time. On the other hand, this thermal treatment creates an obstacle by preventing to bind higher-energy binding sites for resistance response. The effective operation of the NO 2 gas sensor is therefore performed in two parts, which are, adsorption at room temperature and desorption at 150℃.
The attractive mechanical properties of our MLG NO 2 gas sensor allow it to be applied in conditions where flexibility is required. In order to demonstrate its flexibility, the resistance of the MLG NO 2 gas sensor was measured under a bending radius from 23 mm (flat state) to 14 mm (bent state) without any injection of gas. As shown in Fig. 4 c, as the bending radius decreases from 23 mm to 14 mm, resistance starts to increase from 725 Ω to 813 Ω. Following this, as the bending radius reaches the flat state, resistance almost completely recovers. Fig. 4 d shows the variation in resistance for flat and bending states measured at 1 ppm NO 2 for 3 min. The resistance response for the bent state demonstrates as good performance as the flat state.
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a flexible NO 2 gas sensor based on CVD-grown MLG, which is the most promising and attractive active material for detecting gas adsorption down to the single-molecule level. Our MLG NO 2 gas sensor detected in the sub ppm scale, and has a superior mechanical property that allows it to be bent extremely and still function, which is an asset for various applications. The flexible MLG NO 2 gas sensor has outstanding sensitivity (a resistance response of 6.9% and 19.5% for 1 and 30 min, respectively), compared to other graphene-based gas sensors. Solving the major obstacle, namely its slow desorption property related to the vacancies, structural defects and oxygen functional groups of graphene, still remains as a challenge to be addressed, to realize a more practical device.
This work was supported by the Global Frontier Research Center for Advanced Soft Electronics (NRF 2011-0031640), the Creative Research Program of Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (13ZE1110), and the basic research fund of Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (G04110090).
Novoselov KS , Geim AK , Morozov SV , Jiang D , Zhang Y , Dubonos SV , Grigorieva IV , Firsov AA (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306 666 -    DOI : 10.1126/science.1102896
Zhang Y , Tan YW , Stormer HL , Kim P (2005) Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene. Nature 438 201 -    DOI : 10.1038/nature04235
Novoselov KS , Geim AK , Morozov SV , Jiang D , Katsnelson MI , Grigorieva IV , Dubonos SV , Firsov AA (2005) Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438 197 -    DOI : 10.1038/nature04233
Lee C , Wei X , Kysar JW , Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321 385 -    DOI : 10.1126/science.1157996
Kim KS , Zhao Y , Jang H , Lee SY , Kim JM , Kim KS , Ahn JH , Kim P , Choi JY , Hong BH (2009) Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 457 706 -    DOI : 10.1038/nature07719
Robinson JT , Perkins FK , Snow ES , Wei Z , Sheehan PE (2008) Reduced graphene oxide molecular sensors. Nano Lett 8 3137 -    DOI : 10.1021/nl8013007
Dan Y , Lu Y , Kybert NJ , Luo Z , Johnson ATC (2009) Intrinsic response of graphene vapor sensors. Nano Lett 9 1472 -    DOI : 10.1021/nl8033637
Schedin F , Geim AK , Morozov SV , Hill EW , Blake P , Katsnelson MI , Novoselov KS (2007) Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene. Nat Mater 6 652 -    DOI : 10.1038/nmat1967
Lu G , Ocola LE , Chen J (2009) Room-temperature gas sensing based on electron transfer between discrete tin oxide nanocrystals and multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Adv Mater 21 2487 -    DOI : 10.1002/adma.200803536
Fowler JD , Allen MJ , Tung VC , Yang Y , Kaner RB , Weiller BH (2009) Practical chemical sensors from chemically derived graphene. ACS Nano 3 301 -    DOI : 10.1021/nn800593m
Dua V , Surwade SP , Ammu S , Agnihotra SR , Jain S , Roberts KE , Park S , Ruoff RS , Manohar SK (2010) All-organic vapor sensor using inkjet-printed reduced graphene oxide. Angew Chem Int Ed 49 2154 -    DOI : 10.1002/anie.200905089
Joshi RK , Gomez H , Alvi F , Kumar A (2010) Graphene films and ribbons for sensing of O2, and 100 ppm of CO and NO2in practical conditions. J Phys Chem C 114 6610 -    DOI : 10.1021/jp100343d
Jeong HY , Lee DS , Choi HK , Lee DH , Kim JE , Lee JY , Lee WJ. , Kim SO , Choi SY (2010) Flexible room-temperature NO2gas sensors based on carbon nanotubes/reduced graphene hybrid films. Appl Phys Lett 96 213105 -    DOI : 10.1063/1.3432446
Obraztsov AN , Obraztsova EA , Tyurnina AV , Zolotukhin AA (2007) Chemical vapor deposition of thin graphite films of nanometer thickness. Carbon 45 2017 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.05.028
Reina A , Jia X , Ho J , Nezich D , Son H , Bulovic V , Dresselhaus MS , Kong J (2008) Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett 9 30 -    DOI : 10.1021/nl801827v
Obraztsov AN (2009) Chemical vapour deposition: making graphene on a large scale. Nat Nanotechnol 4 212 -    DOI : 10.1038/nnano.2009.67
Lee MS , Lee KJ (2005) Separation of iron and nickel from a spent FeCl3etching solution by solvent extraction. Hydrometallurgy 80 163 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.hydromet.2005.06.010
Ferrari AC , Meyer JC , Scardaci V , Casiraghi C , Lazzeri M , Mauri F , Piscanec S , Jiang D , Novoselov KS , Roth S , Geim AK (2006) Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett 97 187401 -    DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401
Wang Yy , Ni Zh , Yu T , Shen ZX , Wang Hm , Wu Yh , Chen W , Shen Wee AT AT (2008) Raman studies of monolayer graphene: the substrate effect. J Phys Chem C 112 10637 -    DOI : 10.1021/jp8008404
Ganhua L , Leonidas EO , Junhong C (2009) Reduced graphene oxide for room-temperature gas sensors. Nanotechnology 20 445502 -    DOI : 10.1088/0957-4484/20/44/445502