In order to explore an effect of interaction of
Streptococcus gordonii
,
Fusobacterium nucleatum
and
Porphyromonas gingivalis
that are bacteria relevant to periodontal disease on its growth, the bacteria were incubated in trypticase soy hemin menadione broth at 37°C CO
2
incubator for 7 days through anaerobic jar by single and co-culture with heat treated dead bacteria under anaerobic gas pack. In order to confirm growth level, absorbance was measured and for confirming colony structure and form, it was observed with scanning electron microscope. In order to confirm an effect on pathogenicity of
P. gingivalis
, real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was implemented for expression analysis for
rgpA
gene that produces HRgpA which is gingipain. As a result, the following conclusion was obtained. Colony formation of
S. gordonii
and
P. gingivalis
was increased by other dead bacteria and in case of
F. nucleatum
, its colony formation was showed an aspect of being increased by dead bacterium of
P. gingivalis
but decreased by dead bacterium of
S. gordonii
. Therefore, it is considered that the strains being used for this study would affect interactively through bacterial cell itself as well as their interaction factor at the time of colony formation.
Introduction
Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammatory infectious disease occurring in dental tissue supporting teeth
1)
. It was reported that most of the adults are contracted by periodontal disease
2)
and prevalence of periodontal disease of domestic adults is showing a tendency of being increased continuously
3)
. According to national health nutrients survey being performed by Centers for Disease Control in 2008, it was revealed that periodontal disease prevalence of our domestic adults was 73.9% and it was rapidly increased after the forties
4)
. Periodontal disease induces diversified symptoms including gingival bleeding, swelling, formation of periodontal pocket, loss of attached gingiva and destruction of alveolar bone and it is a major cause of teeth loss
5,6)
. Since the period from 1960s to 1970s when periodontal disease was proved to occur by oral bacteria infection
7-9)
, dental plaque has been known as major cause of periodontal disease
10)
.
Dental plaque means cohesive biofilm that is formed by various oral bacteria being attached to acquired pellicle being formed on dental surface
11)
and most of oral bacteria exist in a form of biofilm
12,13)
. At an early stage of biofilm formation,
Streptococcus gordonii
is attached to host protein of dental surface and
Streptococcus mutans
,
Streptococcus salivarius
and
Streptococcus mitis
are found
12)
. Afterwards,
Veillonella
and other anaerobic bacteria are also represented and
Fusobacterium nucleatum
is attached to early colony
12,14)
. Bacterial distribution in oral biofilm varies depending on oral environmental elements such as pH, reduction potential and nutrition
15)
. Therefore, the more oral environment is changed to anaerobic nature, the more number of anaerobic bacteria is increased
14)
.
Anaerobic bacteria such as
F. nucleatum
,
Porphyromonas gingivalis
are frequently discovered in gingival lesion and they have relation with occurrence and progress of periodontal disease
16,17)
. It was reported that amount, ratio and occurrence frequency of these anaerobic bacteria were increased in subgingiva of patients with chronic periodontal disease
18)
and in deep probing site of Korean patients with periodontal disease also, bacterial occurrence frequency was represented over 80%
19)
. Among these,
P. gingivalis
that is anaerobic gram negative bacillus inhibits phagocytosis and anti-bacterial activity of neutrophilic leukocyte by producing gingipain that is a protease decomposing collagen of periodontal tissue and creating cytotoxic
20-24)
. In addition,
Treponema denticola
has mobility as spiral shaped, obligatory anaerobic and gram negative bacterium and it creates infection by being attached to and penetrating into host tissue or substrate protein through protease and adhesion
13,20,25,26)
.
F. nucleatum
plays a role of bridge connecting later stage colony such as
P. gingivalis
,
T. denticola
,
Tannerella forsythia
with early stage colony like
Streptococci
species (spp.)
27-29)
. In other words,
F. nucleatum
is attached to early colony attached to dental surface and on top of it, later stage colony is attached and then biofilm is formed
27,28)
.
Most of bacteria existing in biofilm is able to be attached and cohere with other bacteria and through this reaction, it forms dental plaque and helps other bacteria’s attachment
30)
. Cohesion among bacteria takes place among colonies at an early stage of dental plaque and between early colony and later stage colony and it was also reported that it could take place in later stage colony as well
31)
. Um et al.
30)
reported that this cohesive reaction situates bacteria closely and mutual interaction could be facilitated.
Interaction in bacterial colony is represented by various phenomena and it affects growth of different strains through nutrients production as well
7,13,32)
. Lactic acid being produced by
Streptococci
and
Actinomyces
is used by
Veillonella
spp. as its energy source
7,13)
. In addition, Vitamin K produced by
Veillonella parvula
is used at the time of
Porphyromonas
spp. growth and isobutyrate that is celluar membrane fatty acid produced by
Fusobacterium
spp. is used by
Treponema microdentium
32)
.
This interaction among bacteria is helpful for symbiosis but antagonism often takes place in some bacteria existing in dental plaque
13,33)
.
Streptococci
inhibits proliferation of
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans
by producing hydrogen peroxide
13)
and
A. actinomycetemcomitans
inhibits growth of
Streptococcus sanguinis
in dental plaque by producing bactericin
7)
. Like this, distribution of bacteria in biofilm also takes place by diversified interaction of bacteria
34,35)
. Therefore, it could be explained that oral bacterial distribution is changed by inter-bacterial factors
1)
.
A lot of researches on oral inter-bacterial interaction that creates periodontal disease have been performed but a study on an effect of interaction with dead bacteria on bacterial colony formation is deficient in reality.
Therefore, in this study, an effect of dead bacteria of
S. gordonii
,
F. nucleatum
and
P. gingivalis
on bacterial colony formation was intended to be explored. In other words, in order to confirm colony formation level, absorbance was measured and in order to confirm colony structure and form, it was observed with scanning electron microscope. In addition, in order to confirm an effect on pathogenicity of
P. gingivalis
that is major bacterium causing periodontal disease, expression analysis for
rgpA
gene was performed by using real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Through this, by clarifying an effect of inter-bacterial interaction, a basic data required for providing a method of being able to prevent periodontal disease effectively is intended to be provided.
Materials and Methods
- 1. Experimental bacteria strains
Strains used for this study are
S. gordonii
KCTC 5640,
F. nucleatum
KCTC 2640 and
P. gingivalis
KCTC 5352 and it was used by purchasing it from Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC) in Korea Research Institute Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB).
- 2. Culture of bacteria
20 μl of
S. gordonii
,
F. nucleatum
and
P. gingivalis
were dispensed in 2 ml of sterilized trypticase soy broth with hemin and menadione (TSB; MBcell, Los Angeles, CA, USA) and cultured in 37°C CO
2
incubator (Mco-175; Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) under anaerobic gas pack condition for 7 days through anaerobic jar and all the strains used for this study were sub-cultured for more than 2 times.
- 3. Single culture and co-culture of bacteria
In order to dispense based on same quantity, the number of bacteria of subcultured strains was measured by using UV/Vis Spectrophotometer (DU 730 Life Science UV/Vis Spectrophotometer; Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Afterwards, each of the bacteria (1×10
7
bacteria/ml) was cultured on a single basis for 7 days by making it suspended in TSB. In addition, in order to explore an interaction with dead bacteria, co-culture for such strains was performed based on same amount (1×10
7
bacteria/ml) as that of bacteria being cultured on a single basis after heat treating for 30 minutes at 100°C.
- 4. Measurement of absorbance
In order to explore colony formation level at the time of single culture of each bacterium and co-culture with dead bacteria, absorbance was measured. After mixing each colony evenly by vortex, it was dispensed to 96 well microtitier plate by each 200 μl and absorbance was measured at 595 nm by using microplate reader (GENios Spectra Fluor Plus; Tecan Group, Männedorf, Switzerland).
- 5. Observation by scanning electron microscope
In order to confirm colony structure and form being formed by single culture of each bacterium and co-culture with dead bacteria, it was observed by scanning electron microscope. Each bacterium was pre-fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution [PBS], pH 7.4) for 4 hours after washing it with PBS (0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4) for 2 times (10 minutes/time). Afterwards, it was post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4) for 1 hour after washing it with same PBS for 2 times (10 minutes/time). Again, after washing it with same PBS for 1 time (10 minutes/1 time), it was dehydrated in the order of ethanol concentration increase. After dehydration is completed, it was dried by using critical point dryer (HCP-2; Hitachi, Ibaraki, Japan) and after performing platinum coating in Ion sputter (E-1030; Hitachi) and attaching specimen to stub, it was observed by scanning electron microscope (S-4700; Hitachi) under 10 kV.
- 6.P. gingivalis rgpAgene expression
In order to explore an effect of dead bacteria of other strains on pathogenecity of
P. gingivalis
that is major bacterium causing periodontal disease, real-time RT-PCR was performed for analysis of
rgpA
expression that is a gene relevant to HRgpA. First, after mixing bacterial culture solution evenly with vortex, TSB (bacterium culture solution) of 1 ml was dispensed in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube and it was centrifuged based on 2,000
g
for 1 minute by using centrifuger (Centrifuge5424R; Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). After removing supernatant, bacterial culture solution of 1 ml was dispensed again and it was centrifuged based on 2,000
g
for 1 minute. After removing supernatant to maximum, adding Pre Lysis Buffer of 250 μl (iNtRON, Seongnam, Korea) and making it resuspended again with pipette, it was incubated for 3 minutes at 95°C. And then, it was incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes after adding easy-RED BYF solution (iNtRON) of 750 μl and mixing it with vortex for 15 minutes. Afterwards, it was incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes after adding chloroform of 200 μl and mixing with vortex for 15 seconds again. After centrifuging it for 15 minutes at 4°C based on 21,130
g
, supernatant of 400 μl was dispensed to new 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube. After adding same amount of isopropanol and mixing it well by inverting the tube for 7 times, it was incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature. Afterwards, supernatant was removed after centrifugation for 10 minutes at 4°C based on 21,130
g
and after adding 70% ethanol of 1 ml and mixing it well by inverting the tube for 7 times, it was centrifuged for 5 minutes at 4°C based on 21,130
g
. After removing supernatant to maximum, drying remaining RNA pellet and dissolving such pellet in RNase-free water of 20 μl, its concentration was measured by using NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).
Afterwards, after matching final capacity as 20 μl by mixing total RNA of 1 μl, I-Green 2× qPT-PCR Mix (iNtRON) of 10 μl, qRT-PCR Enzyme Mix (iNtRON) of 0.4 μl, forward and reverse primer of 1 μl and DNase/RNase free water, it was reacted at 42°C for 15 minutes, 95°C for 10 minutes, 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 60 seconds respectively and this was measured for 40 times repeatedly. Sequence of primer being used in real-time RT-PCR is as shown on
Table 1
and reaction result was represented as cycle threshold (Ct) by measuring it in StepOnePlus real-time RT-PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in real time. The experiments in this study were performed three times in triplicate, it was represented by representative data.
Primers Used for Real Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Primers Used for Real Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
- 7. Statistical analysis
For statistical analysis of this study, PASW Statistics ver. 18.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) was used and its result was verified by one-way ANOVA. In addition, through Dunnett T3, post-analysis was performed and when p-value was below 0.05, it was deemed to be significant.
Results
- 1. Comparison of growth in single and co-culture ofS. gordonii,F. nucleatumandP. gingivalis
At the time of single culture of
S. gordonii
and co-culture with dead bacteria of other strains, growth was compared. At the time of single culture of
S. gordonii
, its absorbance was 1.420 and as a result of co-culture with dead
F. nucleatum
being killed with heat treatment for 30 minutes at 100°C, it was 1.773. In addition, in case of co-culture with dead
P. gingivalis
, it was 1.655. At the time of co-culture with dead bacteria, colony formation of
S. gordonii
was significantly increased statistically compared with single culture (p<0.05).
At the time of single culture of
F. nucleatum
and co-culture with dead bacteria of other strains, colony formation was compared. At the time of single culture of
F. nucleatum
, its absorbance was 1.637 and as a result of co-culture with dead
S. gordonii
being killed with heat treatment for 30 minutes at 100°C, it was 1.360. In addition, in case of co-culture with dead
P. gingivalis
, it was 1.660. At the time of co-culture with dead
S. gordonii
, growth of
F. nucleatum
was significantly decreased statistically compared with single culture (p<0.05). However, at the time of co-culture with dead
P. gingivalis
, it was not significant statistically compared with single culture but its colony formation was represented to be increased.
At the time of single culture of
P. gingivalis
and co-culture with dead bacteria of other strains, growth was compared. At the time of single culture of
P. gingivalis
, its absorbance was 0.890 and as a result of co-culture with dead
S. gordonii
being killed with heat treatment for 30 minutes at 100°C, it was 1.835. In addition, in case of co-culture with dead
F. nucleatum
, it was 1.483. When co-culture of
P. gingivalis
with dead bacteria, its growth was significantly increased than that of single culture statistically (p<0.05;
Fig. 1
).
Comparison of growth in single and co-culture of Streptococcus gordonii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis. (A) The effect of dead F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis on the growth of S. gordonii. (B) The effect of dead S. gordonii and P. gingivalis on the growth of F. nucleatum. (C) The effect of dead S. gordonii and F. nucleatum on the growth of P. gingivalis. OD: optical density, LSg: live S. gordonii, DFn: dead F. nucleatum, DPg: dead P. gingivalis, LFn: live F. nucleatum, DSg: dead S. gordonii, LPg: live P. gingivalis. #p<0.05 compared to LSg, LFn or LPg.
- 2. Colony structure and form being formed in single culture and co-culture
Structure and form difference between colony at the time of single culture and colony formation after co-culture with dead bacteria of other strains was confirmed by scanning electron microscope. At the time of co-culture with dead bacterium of
F. nucleatum
, colony formation of
S. gordonii
was more increased compared with single culture of
S. gordonii
. In addition, at the time of co-culture with dead bacterium of
P. gingivalis
also, colony of
S. gordonii
was observed to be more increased than that of single culture.
On the other hand, when co-culture of
F. nucleatum
with dead
S. gordonii
, colony formation of
F. nucleatum
was observed to be decreased than single culture but at the time of co-culture with dead
P. gingivalis
, its colony was more increased than that of single culture. In addition, at the time of co-culture of
P. gingivalis
with dead bacteria of other strains, it was confirmed that colony formation was more increased in both groups than that of single culture of
P. gingivalis
(
Fig. 2
).
Scanning electron microscope images of colony structure and form being formed in single culture and co-culture. (A) Scanning electron microscope images of colony of Streptococcus gordonii with dead Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis. (B) Scanning electron microscope images of colony of F. nucleatum with dead S. gordonii and P. gingivalis. (C) Scanning electron microscope images of colony of P. gingivalis with dead S. gordonii and F. nucleatum. 1) Live S. gordonii, 2) live S. gordonii+dead F. nucleatum, 3) live S. gordonii+dead P. gingivalis, 4) live F. nucleatum, 5) live F. nucleatum+dead S. gordonii, 6) live F. nucleatum+ dead P. gingivalis, 7) live P. gingivalis, 8) live P. gingivalis+dead S. gordonii, 9) live P. gingivalis+dead F. nucleatum. a): ×2,000 times, b): ×5,000 times.
- 3.RgpAgene expression analysis ofP. gingivalis
In order to analyze change of
rgpA
expression, that is gene relevant to HRgpA which is protease, of
P. gingivalis
being represented at the time of co-culture with dead bacteria, real-time RT-PCR was performed. Gene expression was quantified by comparing it with expression of
P. gingivalis
16S. When co-culture with dead
S. gordonii
, its change was increased by 2.96 times than that of single culture. In addition,
rgpA
expression at the time of co-culture with dead
F. nucleatum
was increased by 1.23 times than that of single culture.
RgpA
expression that is gene of
P. gingivalis
was not significant statistically but when co-culture with dead
S. gordonii
and
F. nucleatum
, it was more increased than that of single culture (
Fig. 3
).
RgpA gene expression analysis of Porphyromonas gingivalis. (A) Relative gene expression of rgpA of P. gingivalis by dead Streptococcus gordonii, (B) relative gene expression of rgpA of P. gingivalis by dead Fusobacterium nucleatum. LPg: live P. gingivalis, DSg: dead S. gordonii, DFn: dead F. nucleatum.
Discussion
Various kinds of oral bacteria comprise biofilm
12,36)
.
S. gordonii
is an early colony and it provides a place where bacteria causing periodontal disease could be attached to biofilm
37)
.
F. nucleatum
helps bacteria causing periodontal disease attach to teeth or oral epithelial cells at the middle point of physical interaction of gram positive bacteria and gram negative bacteria. In addition, by decreasing immunity of host, it helps toxic mechanism relevant to other bacteria and plays a very important role in onset and progress of periodontal disease
38)
.
P. gingivalis
, that is gram negative anaerobic bacillus, causes destruction of periodontal tissue by producing protease and delay of injury healing by impeding interaction between host cell and extracellular matrix
38,39)
. It was known that periodontal disease is induced by complex interaction of these bacteria
12,36)
. Therefore, in this study, an effect of interaction with dead bacteria on growth of
S. gordonii
,
F. nucleatum
and
P. gingivalis
that are bacteria relevant to periodontal disease was intended to be explored.
In this study, as a result of comparing growth at the time of single culture of
S. gordonii
and growth at the time of co-culture of
S. gordonii
with dead
F. nucleatum
, growth of
S. gordonii
at the time of co-culture with dead
F. nucleatum
was more significantly increased statistically than its single culture. When observing existing studies on interaction of live
S. gordonii
and
F. nucleatum
, in a study of Lee
1)
where each bacterium was separated by using film with 0.4 μm holes and cultured, they reported that at the time of co-culture with
F. nucleatum, S. gordonii
was significantly grown statistically. Jang
40)
also reported that at the time of co-culture with A1-2 (autoinducer-2) of
F. nucleatum
, biofilm of
S. gordonii
was more formed. In addition, in a study on proteomies change of
S. gordonii
at the time of development of oral biofilm, Hendrickson et al.
41)
also reported that when
S. gordonii
was present together with
F. nucleatum
rather than existing alone, energy metabolism was increased. On the other hand, as a result of this study comparing growth at the time of co-culture of
S. gordonii
and dead
P. gingivalis
, its colony formation was significantly increased statistically than single culture of
S. gordonii
. Lee
1)
reported that at the time of separated co-culture by using film with holes, growth of
S. gordonii
was facilitated by
P. gingivalis
. In addition, Hendrickson et al.
41)
also reported that at the time of development of oral biofilm, energy metabolism was increased when
S. gordonii
was present together with
F. nucleatum
rather than existing alone. In view of these results, it is considered that at the time of growth of
S. gordonii
, not only live bacteria but also dead bacteria of
F. nucleatum
and
P. gingivalis
provides synergy effect.
In this study, at the time of co-culture of
F. nucleatum
with dead bacterium of
S. gordonii
, its colony formation was more significantly decreased statistically than single culture. When observing existing studies on interaction of
F. nucleatum
and live
S. gordonii
, Lee
1)
reported that at the time of separated co-culture,
S. gordonii
impeded growth of
F. nucleatum
. In addition, based on this, they reported further that by inhibiting colony formation of
F. nucleatum
by using oral bacterial flora, oral environment could be maintained cleanly. On the other hand, as a result of this study comparing colony formation at the time of co-culture of
F. nucleatum
with dead
P. gingivalis
, at the time of co-culture of
F. nucleatum
with dead
P. gingivalis
, its result was not significant statistically than single culture of
F. nucleatum
but growth was increased. When observing existing studies on interaction of
P. gingivalis
for
F. nucleatum
, Lee
1)
reported that as a result of separated co-culture with
P. gingivalis
, the number of
F. nucleatum
was increased and was growing more rapidly than single culture as growth facilitating factor was secreted. Saito et al.
42)
also reported that when making AI-2 of
P. gingivalis
producing luxS gene inactivated, strengthening of biofilm formation of
F. nucleatum
was inhibited. In addition, they reported that biofilm formation of
F. nucleatum
was considerably facilitated and strengthened by protein molecule of
P. gingivalis
. In view of these results, it is considered that colony formation of
F. nucleatum
was inhibited by
S. gordonii
but
P. gingivalis
provides colony formation of
F. nucleatum
with synergy effect physically and chemically.
On the other hand, in this study, when comparing colony formation of single culture of
P. gingivalis
with colony formation of co-culture with dead
S. gordonii
, it was more increased in co-culture with dead bacterium than single culture.
P. gingivalis
is attached to
S. gordonii
mediated by pair of hapten-receptor. In addition, FilmA of
P. gingivalis
is bonded with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase on the surface of
S. gordonii
and short flimbriae is bonded with SspA and SspB (Antigen I/II) hapten of
S. gordonii
13)
. Kuboniwa et al.
43)
reported that when
P. gingivalis
is present with
S. gordonii
together in oral biofilm, it forms heterogeneous biofilm and this structure provides
P. gingivalis
with physiological support. Huang et al.
37)
also reported that under the environment of nicotine extract presence, heterogeneous biofilm of
P. gingivalis
and
S. gordonii
is frequently formed. In addition, in this study, when cultured
P. gingivalis
together with dead
F. nucleatum
, its colony formation was significantly increased than single culture. Lee
1)
reported that growth of
P. gingivalis
was increased by
F. nucleatum
. In addition, due to this, if one species is present in oral cavity, it would cause progress of periodontal disease and chronic periodontitis by facilitating growth of bacterium of the other species. Jang
40)
reported that AI-2 of
F. nucleatum
increased formation not only of bacterial membrane of
P. gingivalis
but also of heterogeneous bacterial membrane with other bacteria and cohesive reaction and by being inhibited by quorum sensing inhibitor, AI-2 plays an important role in interaction. In addition, Kuboniwa et al.
43)
also reported that
P. gingivalis
receives physiological support through heterogeneous biofilm formation with
F. nucleatum
. In view of these reports, it is considered that colony formation of
P. gingivalis
receives synergy effect from
S. gordonii
and
F. nucleatum
physically and chemically.
In this study, in order to confirm structure and form difference of colony being formed at the time of cultured each bacterium on a single basis and that being formed after co-cultured with dead bacteria of other strains, it was observed by scanning electron microscope. Comparing with single culture of
S. gordonii
,
S. gordonii
colony at the time of co-culture with dead bacterium of
F. nucleatum
was more increased. In addition, at the time of co-culture with dead
P. gingivalis
also, it was observed that
S. gordonii
colony was more increased than single culture. On the other hand, at the time of co-culture of
F. nucleatum
with dead bacterium of
S. gordonii, F. nucleatum
colony was decreased but at the time of co-culture with dead bacterium of
P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum
colony was more increased than single culture. In addition, at the time of co-culture of
P. gingivalis
with dead bacteria of other strains, its colony formation was confirmed to be more increased in both two groups than single culture. And its aspect was similar to that of optical density being tested in this study. Therefore, it is considered that not only metabolism product being synthesized when bacteria is proliferated and grown but also bacterial cell itself affects colony formation of other strains.
In order to observe what kind of effect was exerted on pathogenicity of
P. gingivalis
by other strains, gene expression change of
P. gingivalis
was confirmed through real-time RT-PCR.
P. gingivalis
induces cytokine regulation failure and functional damage of cells relevant to living organism defense system by producing gingipain which is trypsin-liked protease such as HRgpA, RgpB, Kgp. Among these, HRgpA is produced by
rgpA
gene and it increases blood penetration and destroys coagulated protein by using activity of kallikrein/kinin path relevant to gingivitis and blood coagulation system
24)
. Therefore, in this study, as a result of confirming expression change of
rgpA
that is gene relevant to protease HRgpA of
P. gingivalis
, at the time of co-culture of
P. gingivalis
with dead
S. gordonii
, its expression frequency was not significant statistically but it was more increased than single culture of
P. gingivalis
. It is considered that the more biofilm is old, pathogenicity of
P. gingivalis
would be increased since this result would mean that as early attached
S. gordonii
becomes dead bacterium over time, it increases gingipain formation of
P. gingivalis
. In addition, at the time of co-culture with dead bacterium of
F. nucleatum
also, gene expression of rgpA was not significant statistically but it was more increased than single culture. Lee
44)
reported that at the time of co-culture of
P. gingivalis
with
F. nucleatum
, it induces more inflammable cytokine expression and production in monocytic strain. In addition, they reported that virulence of
P. gingivalis
is increased by communication with
F. nucleatum
and in lipopolysaccaride production also, it represents strong toxicity as lpxA and lpxD expression are increased. Jang
40)
also reported that at the time of co-culture of
P. gingivalis
with AI-2 of
F. nucleatum, rgpA
gene expression was more increased than single culture. Therefore, it is considered that
F. nucleatum
and
S. gordonii
would affect pathogenicity of
P. gingivalis
.
When summarizing the result of this study, colony formation of
S. gordonii
was increased by dead bacteria of
F. nucleatum
and
P. gingivalis
. In case of
F. nucleatum
, its colony formation was decreased by dead bacterium of
S. gordonii
but it had a tendency to increase its colony formation by co-culture with dead bacterium of
P. gingivalis
than that of single culture. In case of
P. gingivalis
, colony formation was increased by dead bacteria of
F. nucleatum
and
S. gordonii
. Therefore, it is considered that strains being used for this test would exchange its effect not only through interaction factors but also through bacterial cell itself at the time of colony formation. In the future, a study reflecting oral environment would be required and further study would be required as to by which substance and mechanism it is affected.
Summary
What kind of influence interaction of
S. gordonii, F. nucleatum
and
P. gingivalis
that are bacteria relevant to periodontal disease exerts on colony formation was intended to be explored. In other words, in order to confirm colony formation level, absorbance was measured and in order to confirm colony structure and form, it was observed by scanning electron microscope. In addition, in order to confirm an effect on pathogenicity of
P. gingivalis
, it was performed by real-time RT-PCR. Afterwards, the significance was verified. As a result of this study, colony formation of
S. gordonii
was increased by dead bacteria of
F. nucleatum
and
P. gingivalis
. In case of
F. nucleatum
, its colony formation was decreased by dead bacterium of
S. gordonii
but it was represented to be increased by dead bacterium of
P. gingivalis
. In case of
P. gingivalis
, colony formation was increased by both dead bacteria of
F. nucleatum
and
S. gordonii
. Therefore, it is considered that strains being used in this test would exchange its effect not only through interaction factors but also through bacterial cell itself at the time of colony formation.
Lee CK
2010
The effect of the interaction of oral bacteria on the growth of periodontopathogens. Unpublished master’s thesis
Dankook University
Cheonan
Douglass CW
,
Gillings D
,
Sollecito W
,
Gammon M
1983
National trends in the prevalence and severity of the periodontal diseases
J Am Dent Assoc
107
403 -
412
DOI : 10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0273
Woo DH
,
You HY
,
Kim MJ
,
Kim HN
,
Kim JB
,
Jeong SH
2013
Risk indicators of periodontal disease in Korean adults
J Korean Acad Oral Health
37
95 -
102
DOI : 10.11149/jkaoh.2013.37.2.95
2009
Food & nutrient intakes of Koreans in 2008: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Osong
Kim SM
,
Choi NK
,
Cho SH
2011
Periodontopathic bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes of oral biofilms in children
J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent
38
170 -
178
DOI : 10.5933/JKAPD.2011.38.2.170
Perry DA
,
Beemsterber PL
2007
Periodontology for the dental hygienist
3rd ed.
Saunders Elsevier
Philadelphia
57 -
58
Kim YH
,
Kim JS
,
Nam YO
2006
Oral prophylaxis
4th ed.
Chung-Ku Publisher
Seoul
Kim JB
,
Paik DI
,
Moon HS
2005
Clinical preventive dentistry
4th ed.
KMS
Seoul
77 -
78
Lamont RJ
,
Jenkinson HF
2010
Oral microbiology at a glance
Wiley-Blackwell
Chichester
Kim EJ
2003
A study on the reduction effects on oral microorganisms through the different methods of controlling dental plaque. Unpublished master’s thesis
Dankook University
Cheonan
Kinniment SL
,
Wimpenny JW
,
Adams D
,
Marsh PD
1996
Development of a steady-state oral microbial biofilm community using the constant-depth film fermenter
Microbiology
142
631 -
638
DOI : 10.1099/13500872-142-3-631
Kolenbrander PE
,
Palmer RJ
,
Periasamy S
,
Jakubovics NS
2010
Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance
Nat Rev Microbiol
8
471 -
480
DOI : 10.1038/nrmicro2381
Takarada K
,
Kimizuka R
,
Takahashi N
2004
A comparison of the antibacterial efficacies of essential oils against oral pathogens
Oral Microbiol Immunol
19
61 -
64
DOI : 10.1046/j.0902-0055.2003.00111.x
Haffajee AD
,
Teles RP
,
Socransky SS
2006
Association of Eubacterium nodatum and Treponema denticola with human periodontitis lesions
Oral Microbiol Immunol
21
269 -
282
DOI : 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2006.00287.x
Yun JH
,
Park JE
,
Kim DI
2008
Identification of putative periodontal pathogens in Korean chronic periodontitis patients
J Korean Acad Periodontol
38
143 -
152
DOI : 10.5051/jkape.2008.38.2.143
Han MD
,
Kim YK
2003
Oral microbiology
4th ed.
KMS
Seoul
Madianos PN
,
Papapanou PN
,
Sandros J
1997
Porphyromonas gingivalis infection of oral epithelium inhibits neutrophil transepithelial migration
Infect Immun
65
3983 -
3990
Darveau RP
,
Belton CM
,
Reife RA
,
Lamont RJ
1998
Local chemokine paralysis, a novel pathogenic mechanism for Porphyromonas gingivalis
Infect Immun
66
1660 -
1665
Yang DH
2009
Gingipain of Porphyromonas gingivalis: a review of major journals. Unpublished master’s thesis
Chonnam National University
Gwangju
Fenno JC
,
Hannam PM
,
Leung WK
1998
Cytopathic effects of the major surface protein and the chymotrypsinlike protease of Treponema denticola
Infect Immun
66
1869 -
1877
Park KJ
2006
Screening and investigation of growth factor in Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola co-culture. Unpublished master’s thesis
Chonnam National University
Gwangju
Bradshaw DJ
,
Marsh PD
,
Watson GK
,
Allison C
1998
Role of Fusobacterium nucleatum and coaggregation in anaerobe survival in planktonic and biofilm oral microbial communities during aeration
Infect Immun
66
4729 -
4732
Scheie AA
,
Petersen FC
2004
The biofilm concept; consequences for future prophylaxis of oral diseases?
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med
15
4 -
12
DOI : 10.1177/154411130401500102
Um HS
,
Lee SW
,
Park JH
,
Nauman RK
2006
Coaggregation between Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythia
J Korean Acad Periodontol
36
265 -
272
DOI : 10.5051/jkape.2006.36.1.265
Bagg J
,
MacFarlane TW
,
Poxton IR
,
Smith AJ
2006
Essentials of microbiology for dental students
2nd ed.
Oxford University Press
Oxford
Kuboniwa M
,
Tribble GD
,
James CE
2006
Streptococcus gordonii utilizes several distinct gene functions to recruit Porphyromonas gingivalis into a mixed community
Mol Microbiol
60
121 -
139
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05099.x
Rickard AH
,
Palmer RJ Jr
,
Blehert DS
2006
Autoinducer 2: a concentration-dependent signal for mutualistic bacterial biofilm growth
Mol Microbiol
60
1446 -
1456
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05202.x
Huang R
,
Li M
,
Ye M
2014
Effect of nicotine on Streptococcus gordonii growth, biofilm formation and cell aggregation
Appl Environ Microbiol
[Epub ahead of print]
Song YJ
2014
Classification of periodontal pathogens based on genetic specificity. Unpublished master’s thesis
Seoul National University
Seoul
Kesic L
,
Milasin J
,
Igic M
,
Obradovic R
2008
Microbial etiology of periodontal disease-mini review
J Periodontal Res
15
1 -
6
Jang YJ
2013
The role of autoinducer 2 quorum sensing in biofilm formation by oral bacteria. Unpublished master’s thesis
Seoul National University
Seoul
Hendrickson EL
,
Wang T
,
Dickinson BC
2012
Proteomics of Streptococcus gordonii within a model developing oral microbial community
BMC Microbiol
12
211 -
DOI : 10.1186/1471-2180-12-211
Saito Y
,
Fujii R
,
Nakagawa KI
,
Kuramitsu HK
,
Okuda K
,
Ishihara K
2008
Stimulation of Fusobacterium nucleatum biofilm formation by Porphyromonas gingivalis
Oral Microbiol Immunol
23
1 -
6
Kuboniwa M
,
Hendrickson EL
,
Xia Q
2009
Proteomics of Porphyromonas gingivalis within a model oral microbial community
BMC Microbiol
9
98 -
DOI : 10.1186/1471-2180-9-98
Lee YJ
2012
Change of Porphyromonas gingivalis virulences in cultivating with Fusobacterium nucleatum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
Dankook University
Cheonan