Advanced
The Effect of Carious Pit and Fissure Sealant on Secondary Caries and Using Status
The Effect of Carious Pit and Fissure Sealant on Secondary Caries and Using Status
Journal of Dental Hygiene Science. 2014. Dec, 14(4): 589-596
Copyright © 2014, the Korean Society of Dental Hygiene science
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Received : November 07, 2014
  • Accepted : November 28, 2014
  • Published : December 31, 2014
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Share
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
문진 정
아름 김
민지 김
순정 정
정희 손
성균 정
도선 임
idsun@eulji.ac.kr

Abstract
This study was designed to investigate the using status and awareness of pit and fissure sealant, and how it affects on secondary caries when performed on above of initial caries. After classifying 446 occlusal surface into four groups, performed pit and fissure sealant, induced artificial caries, used DIAGNOdent (Kavo) to measure degree of secondary caries. Also, distributed a questionnaire on dental clinic in metropolitan area to find out using status and awareness of pit and fissure sealant, the following results were obtained. 1) On inspection and percussion, Group 4 corresponding to the enamel caries showed the highest secondary caries after sealant and was statistically significant difference in the order of initial group, stained group, sound group (p<0.05). 2) Inspection showed the highest percentage on tooth fissure caries diagnostic methods before sealant. 3) 56.6% didn’t know about DIAGNOdent, 91.6% didn’t have it. 4) In clinically, the most cause of secondary caries after sealant was a broken sealant, making caries on the downward. Based on the results of above study, degree of caries under sealant could affect on secondary caries, needs publicity about the use and necessity of objective fluorescence device.
Keywords
Introduction
Dental caries is one of a main cause of tooth mortality 1) . The occlusal surface of permanent tooth is very weak on caries, being a first part of decay occurs 2,3) . Pit and fissure only takes about 13% of occlusal surface but 81% of new decay starts on pit and fissure 3-5) . According to the dental survey in 2000, 28.3% of 6-year-old children (the eruptive period of the first molar), and more than 50% decay had occurred within 3 years after eruption. And on dental survey in 2005, proportion of fissure caries in immature permanent teeth caries was reported to be 91.8% and 88% in Korea and the United States 4) .
Sealant has developed and has been used to prevent the decay of pit and fissure 6) . The sealant makes physical and chemical barriers so the areas can’t be exposed to saliva, food, and oral biofilm 7) . So it can prevent pit and fissure decay. In 2001, Wendt et al. 8) did a cohort research for clinical assessment of sealant on occlusal and buccal pit after 15∼20 years, 65% of the first molar sealant on occlusal and buccal was perfectly maintained, and 22% was maintained partially, but not occurred any secondary caries. Also they reported that sealant effectively prevent dental caries in long-term 8) . As a result of a sealant stated in the public service in Ireland, the caries was reduced 9) . And Oulis et al. 10) reported sealant could decrease decayed-missing-filled teeth (DMFT) index, Griffin et al. 11) proved sealant in permanent teeth reduced dental caries and was effective in caries management. Also, according to the research of Ahn et al. 12) on the preventive effect of permanent tooth caries, when water fluoridation is implemented with sealant, it is 4 times higher on the probability of not experiencing caries than water fluoridation played in single. In addition, typically sealant had 75∼97% of the effective caries prevention for a year 13,14) .
Sealant not only prevent sound fissure, but also used to inhibit the progression of initial caries by closing the upper part of caries lesions 6) . Furthermore, when applying the sealant to the initial caries reduces microscopic organism and inhibits the ongoing dental tissue destruction 15) . Simonsen 16) reported preventive resin restoration is effective on initial posterior caries or small lesion caries. Heller et al. 17) advert sealant was recommended at initial caries because it was effective. Locker et al. 18) briefed sealant could obstruct the progression of dental caries lesions on initial tooth caries as well as it could prevent the caries on the sound ones. In 2008, Beauchamp et al. 19) recommended sealant for the initial caries lesions that cavity is not formed, based on several clinical evidence about sealant. Sealing on the base and the walls of the fissure caries might be successful as much as sealing sound fissures, said Celiberti and Lussi 20) . At 2010, Im et al. 6) reported it is possible performing sealant on stained or initial caries area, but when performed on a enamel caries area, could detected by exploring, may cause side effects like secondary caries.
Side effects such as secondary caries are associated with the degree of adhesion and leakage between tooth surface and fissure sealant 20,21) . When the microleakage occurred by fracture of the restoration, microleakage cause discoloration, secondary caries, tooth hypersensitivity, pulpitis 20,22) . As a result, If you did not apply sealant well on tooth surface, sealant can cause a rather more caries occurrence 23) .
To date, there are several researches about the effects and leakage of the sealant, but there are few reports whether sealant on initial caries can cause secondary caries. Therefore the purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of the sealant on the secondary caries when the sealant applies on initial caries and analyze the using status and awareness of laser caries diagnostic tool, DIAGNOdent (Kavo, Biberach, Germany), and sealant.
Materials and Methods
- 1. Artificial caries degree evaluation
- 1) Materials
We used the permanent premolar and molar, which was extracted for the purpose of orthodontic treatment, the occlusal surface area of 446 were used as test subjects. And the Ultraseal XT plus (Ultradent, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a tooth fissure sealant. DIAGNOdent was used in order to divide the teeth into four groups according to the degree of caries. A buffer solution (0.1 M lactic acid, 13.04 mM CaCl 2 ㆍ2H 2 O, 7.49 mM KH 2 PO 4 , pH 4.3) was used as a artificial caries lactic acid solution.
- 2) Group selection and pit and fissure sealant
The occlusal surface of the tooth was performed oral prophylaxis. And tooth occlusal surface 446 areas were divided into four groups according to the degree of discoloration and caries by visual inspection, probe and laser fluorescence caries diagnosis ( Table 1 ).
Classification of Experimental Groups by DIAGNOdent and the Clinical Examination
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Classification of Experimental Groups by DIAGNOdent and the Clinical Examination
- 3) Artificial demineralization and caries degree evaluation
We induced an artificial dental caries. Put on the teeth one by one into the vial per 0.1 M lactic acid buffer solution by one tooth per 100 ml. And kept on 37℃ thermostat for 6 days. Also, artificial caries induced degree was measured by DIAGNOdent after washing it with distilled water and dry.
- 2. Pit and fissure sealant awareness and conditions survey
For this study, we produced a questionnaire consisted of 14 questions. And distributed and collected 200 questionnaires on dental clinic in the metropolitan area. Used 166 questionnaires for final analysis excluding no and multiple response questionnaires.
- 3. Statistical analysis
Each item of the questionnaire was carried out frequency analysis. Used one-way ANOVA on evaluating to compare the groups of artificial caries induced degree. And used Dunnett T3 for multiple comparison. Level of significance was set at p<0.05. Data analysis of this study used SPSS ver. 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
- 1. Artificial caries degree evaluation
Group 4, clinically detected loss of enamel and indicated DIAGNOdent levels of 21∼29, was the highest as 12.81.
In order of Group 3, Group 2, Group 1, artificial caries level has reduced (p<0.05; Table 2 ).
Artificial Secondary Caries Level (n=446)
PPT Slide
Lager Image
a∼d The same letter denoted that there was no significant difference between groups by Dunnett T3 multiple comparison. p-values were determined by one-way ANOVA.
- 2. Awareness and usage of sealant
- 1) Respondents and using status of pit and fissure sealant
Respondents were consisted of 53.6% dental hygienists, 31.3% nursing assistants, coordinators of 9.6%, 5.4% dentist. The number of patients who had sealant treatment per week was most common at ‘less than four’ as 60% and 5∼9 people, 10∼19 people, 20∼29 people, 30 or more were in the order. The most common diagnostic method before sealant was visual inspection 39.9%, followed by explorer 20.4%, x-ray 18.5%, percussion 9.7%, oral camera 8.9% and laser fluorescence detection 2.6%. Person in charge to apply sealant was 55.9% for ‘dentist’, 38.6% for ‘dental hygienist’, 5.5% for ‘nurse’s aide’. As a type of using sealant, 32.7% for ‘Concise Sealant (3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA)’, 26.5% for ‘Clinpro Sealant (3M ESPE Dental Products)’. 15.3% for ‘others’, 13.8% for ‘Eco-S Sealant (Vericom Co., Anyang, Korea)’, 11.7% ‘Maximum Cure Sealant (Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, IL, USA)’. Sealant application areas was highest on ‘erupted first molar’ 35.6%, followed by ‘erupted second molar’ 31.7%, ‘erupted deciduous molar’ 12.8%, ‘erupting first molar’ 9.6%, ‘erupting second molar’ 8.0%, ‘erupting deciduous molar’ 1.4% and ‘others’ 0.9% ( Table 3 ).
Respondent and Using Status of Pit and Fissure Sealant
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Respondent and Using Status of Pit and Fissure Sealant
- 2) Using status of laser fluorescence caries device
Status recognition about laser fluorescence caries device appeared 56.6% ‘no’ and 43.4% ‘yes’. Among respondents said ‘yes’, when we asked that you had seen the laser fluorescence caries device directly, 55.6% of them said ‘no’ and 44.4% of them said ‘yes’. Answer to ‘Does your dentist possess a laser fluorescence caries device?’ was 91.6% ‘no’, and 8.4% ‘yes’. Also, the answer to ‘Who diagnosis if you had a laser fluorescence caries devices?’ was 57.7% on dentist, 34.6% on dental hygienist, 7.7% on nurse’s aide. Reason of not using the laser fluorescence caries device was ‘didn’t know the device’ 30.5%, ‘didn’t need the device’ 26.8%, ‘didn’t use the device’ 23.8%, ‘too expensive’ 11.6% and ‘others’ 7.3% ( Table 4 ).
Using Status of Laser Fluorescence Caries Device
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Using Status of Laser Fluorescence Caries Device
- 3) Occurrence of secondary caries after sealant
As a answer to a question ‘Whether secondary caries occurs after sealant’, 63.3% said ‘yes’ and 36.7% said ‘no’. Cause of secondary caries was ‘low strength of sealant’ 47.3%, ‘low flowability of sealant’ 26.1%, ‘cariogenic bacteria under sealant’ 20.2%, ‘product problem in itself' 4.3% and ‘others’ 2.1% ( Table 5 ).
Occurrence of Secondary Caries after Sealant
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Occurrence of Secondary Caries after Sealant
Discussion
Diagnosis is very important deciding treatment of initial caries with a filling treatment or sealant 24) . Diagnostic methods is known as lack of accuracy today, so clinicians carry out sealant even on an initial caries because they couldn’t detect it 1) . Therefore, in our study, we tried to evaluate the effects on secondary caries when sealant was performed on the upper side of initial caries, using objective criteria of DIAGNOdent.
Fissure is hard to diagnose due to deep and narrow anatomical shape. But it is important to diagnose and evaluate fissure caries correctly and carefully 18) . As a necessity, various high-tech devices has introduced to diagnose objectively 3,5) . Among those, DIAGNOdent uses red semiconductor laser light source, measures a total intensity of the fluorescence and displays it with sound and number. It has been put to practical use in clinical caries diagnostic tool 25,26) . Kim et al. 25) reported DIAGNO dent had ability to diagnose quantitatively, depending on the degree caries progression. Lee 26) also reported DIAGNO dent could find well-invisible tiny caries and had highly reproducible. In a study of comparison of various diagnostic methods of occlusal carious lesions, Kim et al. 27) reported DIAGNOdent is very useful for early detection of occlusal caries. Also, they said it could evaluate more perfectly when used in combination with radiation tests and inspection in case of a progress of dental caries. Kouchaji 28) said DIAGNOdent pen is valuable, highly reproducible and accurate diagnostic tool in detecting first molar occlusal surface. Therefore, in our study, the experimental group was classified according to occlusal caries degree using a DIAGNOdent. We excluded a tooth that has already formed a dental caries by limiting DIAGNOdent level under 30 according to other studies which said that tooth, DIAGNOdent level is 35∼40, needs a treatment 29,30) . Also, our study measured DIAGNOdent level after drying because Lee et al. 31) said DIAGNOdent level is more referable when it is dry.
Handelman et al. 32) reported as a result of two years’ observation after the sealant has performed above of caries lesion, progression of caries lesions was not shown in clinical and radiological examination. Mertz-Fairhurst et al. 33) reported when resin or amalgam filling has been treated above of caries lesion before sealant, it has more clinical success rates and superior maintenance than one with no filling. In our study, results measured by DIAGNOdent were below 0∼13, on all groups, when artificial secondary caries was induced after sealant.
Maintenance of sealant was affected on degree of penetration and leakage. Most of sealant penetrates on fissure about 40∼90%, but most suitable penetrate degree is normally more than 80%. Clinically, there have been a lot of research and effort to increase penetration of sealant, but basically, the degree of penetration receives a lot of influence on anatomical shape 34) . When Celiberti and Lussi 20) compared degree of microleakage and penetration degree of artificial and natural enamel caries lesion sealant group and sound sealant group, degree of microleakage was affected by location of fissure caries lesions and natural caries lesions showed more high microleakage than the sound ones. A penetration of resin gets disturbed because natural caries has a high percentage of organic material. Hevinga et al. 35) reported microleakage is higher on decayed fissure because it attached improperly at demineralized enamel. Im et al. 6) reported as a result of comparing and evaluating the microleakage and the degree of penetration underwent after sealant, a group of enamel caries was the highest on microleakage among sound, colored, initial caries, and enamel caries groups. Also they said sound group was highest on the degree of penetration in fissure. In present study, enamel caries group (21∼29 level on DIAGNOdent) most commonly caused artificial caries and showed a statistically significant difference in order of initial caries group, colored group, sound group. It is considered that the reason may be low penetration and weak bond strength and microleakage which is most commonly appear after polymerization when tooth fissure caries exist.
Also, in this study, as a results of the questionnaire about diagnostic methods before sealant, visual inspection were the most common and explorer, radiograph, percussion in order. This means that clinicians depend on visual inspection and explorer when they diagnosis. On a question about sealant application areas, ‘erupted first molar’ was highest and followed by ‘erupted second molar’, ‘erupted deciduous molar’ and ‘erupting first molar’. After the tooth erupted into the mouth, the incidence of dental caries was the highest within 1∼2 years after eruption 36) . Once the sealant was implemented in a child, the age of high caries susceptibility, prevention of dental caries can be further improved 36) . For this reason, we considered that this result may appear in our study. Also in our survey about laser fluorescence caries device perception, 56.6% said they didn’t know it and among them, 30.5% even didn’t know laser fluorescence caries device existed. Therefore, we could expect that clinicians could perform sealant on initial caries lesion because they failed to detect it by inspection and explorer. So it is considered that education and promotion about the importance and necessity of objective diagnosis is needed.
In this research that whether secondary caries occur after sealant, 63.6% said ‘yes’, and cause of secondary caries was ‘low strength of sealant’ 47.3%. Feigal et al. 37) reported it could easily remove when sealant has proceeded without using rubber dam. Also, Park et al. 38) said shear bond strength significantly decreased in case of contamination in saliva. It is impossible to block any moisture or saliva completely on dental treatment 38) . So we considered that using rubber dam is a necessary part for successful sealant.
Taken the results of this study all together, caries under sealant expected to affect secondary caries in afterwards and it is important to need publicity about the use and necessity of an objective fluorescence device.
Summary
This study was designed to know how caries under sealant affects on secondary caries. After dividing 446 areas of occlusal surfaces into four groups, we performed pit and fissure sealant on the upper side of fissure, caused secondary caries and used DIAGNOdent to measure degree.
In addition, as a result of the investigation for recognition and using status of pit and fissure sealant, the following results were obtained. First, when visual inspection and explorer had done, secondary caries after sealant on ‘enamel caries’ group was the highest, followed by ‘initial caries’, ‘colored’ and ‘sound’ group. And it was showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Second, visual inspection showed the highest rates on diagnostic methods before sealant. Third, 56.6% didn’t know about laser fluorescence caries device and 91.6% of them didn’t have it. Forth, cause of secondary caries was ‘low strength of sealant’.
Taken all the above results, caries under sealant expected to affect secondary caries in afterwards. So it is important to diagnose and evaluate caries perfectly on preventing secondary caries, also it is believed to need publicity about the use and necessity of an objective fluorescence device.
References
Shin JH , Shin SC , Seo HS , Kim EJ 2002 A clinical study of early caries detection by use of Diagnodent J Korean Acad Dent Health 26 609 - 617
Costa AM , Paula LM , Bezerra AC 2008 Use of diagnodent for diagnosis of non-cavitated occlusal dentin caries J Appl Oral Sci 16 18 - 23    DOI : 10.1590/S1678-77572008000100005
Feigal RJ , Donly KJ 2006 The use of pit and fissure sealants Pediatr Dent 28 143 - 150
Jang GT 2006 Modern concepts of sealant Korean Dent Assoc 44 292 - 300
Kidd EAM 1995 The use of diet analysis and advice in the management of dental caries in adult patients Oper Dent 20 86 - 93
Im E , Lee SH , Lee NY 2010 A study of microleakage and penetration ability of a pit and fissure sealant applied on carious fissure J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 37 345 - 351
Soto-Rojas AE , Escoffie-Ramorez ME , Perez-Ferrera GP , Guido JA , Mantilla-Rodfiguez AA , Maritinez-Mier EA 2012 Retention of dental sealants placed on sound teeth and incipient caries lesions as part of a service-learning programme in rural areas in Mexico Int J Paediatr Dent 22 451 - 458    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01216.x
Wendt LK , Koch G , Birkhed D 2001 On the retention and effectiveness of fissure sealant in permanent molars after 15-20 years: a cohort study Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 29 302 - 307    DOI : 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290410.x
Whelton H 2004 Overview of the impact of changing global patterns of dental caries experience on caries clinical trials J Dent Res 83 29 - 34    DOI : 10.1177/154405910408301S06
Oulis CJ , Berdouses ED , Mamai-Homata E , Polychronopoulou A 2011 Prevalence of sealants in relation to dental caries on the permanent molars of 12 and 15-year-old Greek adolescents. A national pathfinder survey BMC Public Health 11 100 -    DOI : 10.1186/1471-2458-11-100
Griffin SO , Oong E , Kohn W 2008 The effectiveness of sealants in managing caries lesions J Dent Res 87 169 - 174    DOI : 10.1177/154405910808700211
Ahn SH , You HY , Kim MJ , Han DH , Kim JB , Jeong SH 2012 Caries preventive effect of permanent teeth using pit and fissure sealant program and community water fluoridation program J Korean Acad Oral Health 36 289 - 296    DOI : 10.11149/jkaoh.2012.36.4.289
Shaw L 2000 Modern thoughts on fissure sealants Dent Update 27 370 - 374
Burt BA 1998 Prevention policies in the light of the changed distribution of dental caries Acta Odontol Scand 56 179 - 186    DOI : 10.1080/000163598422956
Simonsen RJ 2002 Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature Pediatr Dent 24 393 - 414
Simonsen RJ 2005 Preventive resin restorations and sealants in light of current evidence Dent Clin North Am 49 815 - 823    DOI : 10.1016/j.cden.2005.05.002
Heller KE , Reed SG , Bruner FW , Eklund SA , Burt BA 1995 Longitudinal evaluation of sealing molars with and without incipient dental caries in a public health program J Public Health Dent 55 148 - 153    DOI : 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1995.tb02358.x
Locker D , Jokovic A , Kay EJ 2003 Prevention. Part 8: the use of pit and fissure sealants in preventing caries in the permanent dentition of children Br Dent J 195 375 - 378    DOI : 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810556
Beauchamp J , Caufield PW , Crall JJ 2008 Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit and fissure sealants J Am Dent Assoc 139 257 - 268    DOI : 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0155
Celiberti P , Lussi A 2007 Penetration ability and microleakage of a fissure sealant applied on artificial and natural enamel fissure caries J Dent 35 59 - 67    DOI : 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.04.007
Dennison JB , Straffon LH , Smith RC 2000 Effectiveness of sealant treatment over five years in an insured population J Am Dent Assoc 131 597 - 605    DOI : 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0233
Kim JH , Park JW , Park JH , Kim SK 1999 Bond strength and microleakage in resin bonding to tooth structure Restor Dent Endod 24 570 - 577
Lee SH 2011 Pit and fissure sealing-advanced technique Korean Dent Assoc 49 22 - 32
Shin SC 2001 Sealant of early carious lesion Korean Dent Assoc 39 174 - 177
Kim SH , Lee KH , Kim DE , Park JS 2000 Caries diagnosis by Diagnodent’s laser fluorescence detection in vitro J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 27 24 - 31
Lee KH 2000 Interrater reliability of caries diagnosis by diagnodent J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 27 40 - 44
Kim JG , Kim YJ , Kim YS , Baik BJ 2001 In vitro comparison of various diagnostic methods of occlusal carious lesions J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 28 613 - 619
Kouchaji C 2012 Comparison between a laser fluorescence device and visual examination in the detection of occlusal caries in children Saudi Dent J 24 169 - 174    DOI : 10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.07.002
Khalife MA , Boynton JR , Dennison JB , Yaman P , Hamilton JC 2009 In vivo evaluation of Diagnodent for the quantification of occlusal dental caries Oper Dent 34 136 - 141    DOI : 10.2341/08-54
Krause F , Jepsen S , Braun A 2007 Comparision of two laser fluorescence devices for the detection of occlusalcaries in vivo Eur J Oral Sci 115 252 - 256    DOI : 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00456.x
Lee YK , Hong HK , Jin BH 2007 Variations in optical properties of sound bovine teeth: searching for possible parameters for the caries assessment J Korean Acad Dent Health 31 461 - 471
Handelman SL , Buonocore MG , Schoute PC 1973 Progress report on the effect of a fissure sealant on bacteria in dental caries J Am Dent Assoc 87 1189 - 1191    DOI : 10.14219/jada.archive.1973.0584
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ , Schuster GS , Fairhurst CW 1986 Arresting caries by sealants: results of a clinical study J Am Dent Assoc 112 194 - 197    DOI : 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0340
Lee SH 2006 Retention of pit and fissure sealant J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 33 336 - 347
Hevinga MA , Opdam NJ , Frencken JE , Bronkhorst EM , Truin GJ 2007 Microleakage and sealant penetration in contaminated carious fissures J Dent 35 909 - 914    DOI : 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.09.001
Jin BH , Moon HS , Paik DI , Kim JB 1992 A study on the models predicting 6-year-old children’s dmfs increment in one year J Korea Acad Dent Health 16 429 - 451
Feigal RJ , Hitt J , Splieth C 1993 Retaining sealant on salivary contamination enamel J Am Dent Assoc 124 88 - 97
Park SY , Choi SC , Choi YC , Kim KC , Park JH 2012 The influence of salivary contamination on shear bond strength of pit and fissure sealant by use of several bonding agents J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 39 153 - 159    DOI : 10.5933/JKAPD.2012.39.2.153