Advanced
Effects of Cu Wire's Shape on the Plating Property of Sn-Pb Solder for Photovoltaic Ribbons
Effects of Cu Wire's Shape on the Plating Property of Sn-Pb Solder for Photovoltaic Ribbons
Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Materials. 2014. Aug, 15(4): 217-220
Copyright © 2014, The Korean Institute of Electrical and Electronic Material Engineers
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Received : April 04, 2014
  • Accepted : June 06, 2014
  • Published : August 25, 2014
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Share
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Tae-Sik Cho
cts@knu.ac.kr
Mun-Seok Chae
Chul-Sik Cho
Abstract
We studied the plating properties of Sn-Pb solder according to the shape of the Cu wire's cross-section for photovoltaic ribbon. The thickness of the Sn-Pb layer largely decreased to 29% on a curved Cu surface, compared to a flat Cu surface. This phenomenon is caused by the geometrical decrease in the contact angle of the liquid Sn-Pb solder and an increase in the surface energy of the solid/vapor on the curved Cu surface. We suggest a new ribbon' s design where the Cu wire's cross-section is a semi-ellipse. These semi-ellipse ribbons can decrease the use of Sn-Pb solder to 64% and increase the photovoltaic efficiency, by reducing the contact area between the ribbon and cell, to 84%. We also see an improvement of reflectivity in the curved surface.
Keywords
1. INTRODUCTION
Photovoltaic (PV) ribbon is widely used as an electric wire to form a connection between cells in a PV module [1 - 3] . PV ribbons are generally classified into two types: interconnector and bus-bar ribbons [1 - 3] . In order to enhance the adhesion between the ribbon and cell [4 - 11] , Cu wire is first fabricated in a ribbon shape by rolling Cu wire. Next, PV ribbon is fabricated by melt plating Sn-Pb solders onto the internal Cu ribbon [12 - 18] . Recently, low-cost PV ribbons are in great demand because of the widespread need for PV modules [19 - 21] .
The aim of this research is to study a new design of PV ribbon that can decrease the use of Sn-Pb solder. Generally, one side of the PV ribbon, especially in the bus-bar type, is being used as for the contact area with cells in PV modules. We suggest a new ribbon's design where the Cu wire's cross-section is a semi-ellipse. The semi-ellipse ribbons can decrease the use of Sn-Pb solder to 64% and increase the photovoltaic efficiency, by reducing the contact area between the ribbon and cell, to 80%. We also see an improvement in reflectivity on the curved surface.
2. EXPERIMENTS
Cu wire samples with different cross-section shapes were fabricated. Cu wires with a diameter of 1.9 mm were used for the PV ribbon samples. Each Cu wire was polished to have a different cross-section shape by fixing it to a self-made sample holder. Next, we fabricated PV ribbon samples, with different cross-section shapes, by melt plating with Sn-Pb solder. The composition of the Sn-Pb solder was Sn 60 -Pb 40 (wt%) and the temperature of melt plating was 250℃. First, each Cu wire was coated with flux, and then plated with liquid Sn-Pb solder. The plating speed was 5.0 mm/sec.
Each sample was prepared for scanning electron microscope (SEM) measurement by being fixed using instantaneous adhesive with a self-made sample holder. Since Sn-Pb solder is very soft, the cross-sections of the SEM samples were precisely polished. The morphologies of the Cu wires and PV ribbons with different cross-section shape were then investigated by SEM. Especially, we minutely observed the thickness and shape of the Sn-Pb solder on the PV ribbons with different cross-section shapes.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figure 1 shows the SEM micrograph of the cross-section of the PV ribbon that is currently in widespread use. We can see from the figure the ribbon nature of the PV wire. In order to enhance the adhesion between the ribbon and cell, Cu wire with a 1.9 mm diameter was firstly elongated until it had a diameter of 1.0 mm, then it was rolled into 0.2 mm thick ribbon with a width of 2.0 mm. As shown in Fig. 1 , the thickness of the Sn-Pb solder on the flat Cu surface is thicker, than that on a curved Cu surface at the edge. Also, the contact angle of the Sn-Pb solder on the flat Cu surface was observed to be lower than 90°, considering the crosssection shape of the Sn-Pb layer [22 , 23] .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
SEM micrograph of the PV ribbon's cross-section that is currently widely used.
The aim of this research is to find a new design of PV ribbon that can decrease the use of Sn-Pb solder. Figure 2 shows the SEM micrographs of Cu wire with different cross-section shapes. Figure 2(a) shows Cu wire whose cross-section shape is a circle. The surface of the Cu wire is composed of only curved surface. Figure 2(b) shows Cu wire whose cross-section shape is a semicircle. The surface of the Cu wire is composed of a flat and a curved surface. Considering application, Fig. 2(c) shows Cu wire whose cross-section shape is a semi-ellipse. The surface of the Cu wire is also composed of flat and curved surfaces.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
SEM micrographs of Cu wire with different cross-section shapes; (a) circle, (b) semi-circle, and (c) semi-ellipse.
Figure 3 shows the SEM micrographs of PV ribbon with different cross-section shapes to study the plating properties of the Sn-Pb solder. The composition of the Sn-Pb solder was Sn60-Pb40(wt%). Figure 3(a) shows PV ribbon whose cross-section shape is a circle. The surface of the Cu wire is composed of only a curved surface. The inset more clearly displays the layer of Sn-Pb solder under higher magnification. The layer of Sn-Pb solder was plated thinly and uniformly around the whole wire. Figure 3(b) shows the PV ribbon whose cross-section shape is a semi-circle. The surface of the Cu wire is composed of flat and curved surfaces. The layer of Sn-Pb solder was plated relatively thickly on the flat Cu surface, compared to that on the curved Cu surface. The thickness of the Sn-Pb solder on the curved surface was very similar to seen in Fig. 3(a) with the circular wire.
Figure 3(c) shows the PV ribbon whose cross-section shape is a semi-ellipse. The surface of the Cu wire is also composed of a flat and a curved surface. Indicating a similar tendency to Fig. 3(b) with the semi-circular wire, the layer of Sn-Pb solder is plated relatively thickly on the flat Cu surfaces, compared to curved Cu surfaces. These results indicate that Sn-Pb solder plates more thickly on flat Cu surfaces, while it plates more thinly on curved Cu surfaces, regardless of the Cu cross-section's shape.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
SEM micrographs of PV ribbon with different cross-section shapes after melt plating; (a) circle, (b) semi-circle, and (c) semiellipse.
The mean thickness of Sn-Pb solder was 13.7 μ m on the surface of the Cu wire with a circular cross-section. On the Cu wire with a semi-circle shape, the mean thickness of the Sn-Pb solder was 12.0 μ m on the curved Cu surface, while it was 46.3 μ m on the flat Cu surface. Also, on the Cu wire with semi-ellipse shape, the mean thickness of Sn-Pb solder was 10.0 μ m on the curved Cu surface, while it was 36.7 μ m on the flat Cu surface. Regardless of the cross-section's shape, the total mean thickness of the Sn-Pb solder was 41.5 μ m on the flat Cu surfaces, while it was 11.9 μ m on the curved Cu surfaces. This result indicates that the thickness of the Sn-Pb layer decreased greatly to 29% on curved Cu surfaces, compared to flat Cu surfaces. We also calculated that the semiellipse ribbons can decrease the use of Sn-Pb solder to 64%, compared to that of conventional ribbon-type ribbon.
Figure 4 is a schematic that illustrates the different plating properties of a liquid Sn-Pb solder drops on flat and curved Cu surfaces. On the flat Cu surface, Fig. 4(a) illustrates the liquid solder drop, having a contact angle of less than 90° [10 , 11] . The schematic of the liquid Sn-Pb solder drop also shows the equilibrium state in Young's equation (γ sv = γ sl + γ lv ·cosθ) [24 - 28] . In the meanwhile, on the curved Cu surface with a semi-ellipse shape, Fig. 4(b) is a schematic of a liquid Sn-Pb solder drop. The contact angle on the curved Cu surface (θ c ) becomes geometrically smaller than that on the flat Cu surface (θ). Also, the surface energy of the curved Cu surface (γ c ) becomes geometrically bigger than that of the flat Cu surface (γ sv ). Therefore, the liquid Sn-Pb solder on the curved Cu surface is more thinly plated, because of the pulling from both sides with increased surface energy (γ c ).
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Schematic of the plating properties of a liquid Sn-Pb solder drop on the flat and curved Cu surfaces.
The contact area between the ribbon and cell is important for enhancing PV efficiency because PV ribbons block sunlight [29 , 30] . Figure 5 shows a comparison of cross-section shape and size of Cu wires with the same cross-section area of 0.40 mm 2 . Figure 5(a) shows a rectangular shape, where the width is 2.00 mm, the height is 0.20 mm, and the circumference is 4.20 mm, similar to that of a conventional ribbon. Figure 5(b) shows a semi-ellipse shape, where the width is 1.67 mm, the height is 0.35 mm, and the circumference is 3.53 mm at an arc angle of 90°. Therefore, the width of the Cu wire decreased to about 84%, compared to the rectangular shape, thereby contributing to the enhancement of PV efficiency. Figure 5(c) shows a semi-circular shape, where the width is 1.01 mm, the height (radius) is 0.505 mm, and the circumference is 2.59 mm. Therefore, the width of Cu wire has decreased to about 50%, compared to the rectangular shape. Considering the increase in contact resistance due to the decrease of contact area [31] , we carefully calculated that the decrease in light blocking area by the Cu shape is significant. From these results, we suggest that semi-ellipse ribbons can decrease the contact area with a cell to about 84%, thereby contributing to the enhancement of PV efficiency, compared to that of conventional ribbon. The semi-ellipse ribbons can also increase the photovoltaic efficiency by improving reflectivity on curved Cu surfaces, compared to conventional ribbon with a flat Cu surface.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Comparison of the shape and size of Cu wires with the same cross-section area of 0.40 mm2; (a) rectangular, (b) semi-ellipse, and (c) semi-circle.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Our study looked at the plating properties of Sn-Pb solder according to the shape of Cu wire's cross-sections for photovoltaic ribbon. Regardless of the shape of the Cu wire's cross-section, the mean thickness of the Sn-Pb solder was 41.5 μ m on flat Cu surfaces, while it was 11.9 μ m on curved Cu surfaces. The thickness of the Sn-Pb layer decreased greatly to 29% on curved Cu surfaces, compared to flat Cu surfaces. This phenomenon is caused by a geometrical decrease of the contact angle for the liquid Sn-Pb solder and also due to the increase in surface energy (γ sv ) on curved Cu surfaces. We suggest a new ribbon's design where the Cu wire's cross-section is a semi-ellipse. The semiellipse ribbons can decrease the use of Sn-Pb solder to 64% and increase the photovoltaic efficiency by reducing the contact area between the ribbon and cell to 84%. We also saw an improvement of reflectivity in the curved surface compared to conventional flat surfaces.
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by the MOTIE, KIAT, DGIRPE, and Sanko Korea through the Leading Industry Development for Economic Region, Korea. This work was supported by Kyungpook National University Research Fund. The author also acknowledges Mr. K. J. Hwang for his contributions to FESEM experiments in the KBSI (Daegu Center).
References
Bagnall D. M. , Boreland M. 2008 Energy Policy http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.070 36 4390 -
Lathrop R. , Pfluke K. 2011 Proc. of the 26th European Union Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conf. 1
Wakefield G. F. , Hills W. 1982 Methode for Ribbon Solar Cell Fabrication
Wendt J. , Trager M. , Klengel R. , Petzold M. , Schade D. , Sykes R. 2010 IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomech- anical Phenomena in Electronic Systems 1
Jeong J. S. , Park N. C. , Han C. W. 2012 Microelectronics Reliability http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2012.06.027 52 2326 -
Chen Y. M. , Chiu Y. P. , Wu H. W. 2012 Genetic Programming and Evolvable Mechanics 1 51 -
Uehara K. , Sakurai M. 2002 J. of Materials Processing Technology http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00122-X 127 178 -
Kim J. , Kim K. S. , Kim Y. H. 1989 J . of Adhesion Science and Technology http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856189X00146 3 175 -
Loveab B. J. , Packmanc P. F. 1993 J. of Adhesion http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00218469308031280 40 139 -
Sexsmith M. , Troczynski T. 1994 J. of Thermal Spray Technology http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02658986 3 404 -
Bobyn J. D. , Wilson G. J. , MacGregor D. C. , Pilliar R. M. , Weatherly G. C. 1982 J. of Biomedical Materials Research http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820160505 16 571 -
Chu M. G. , Shiohara Y. , Flemings M. C. 1984 Metallurgical transactions A http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02648558 15 1303 -
Lee J. H. , Lee Y. H. , Kim Y. S. 2000 Scripta Meterialia http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00431-5 42 789 -
Schaefer M. , Fournelle R. A. , Liang J. 1998 J. of Electronic Materials http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11664-998-0066-7 27 1167 -
Liu C. Y. , Chen C. , Tu K. N. 2000 J. of Applied Physics http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1319327 88 5703 -
Kang S. K. , Rai P. S. , Purushothaman S. 1996 J. of Electronic Materials http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02659912 25 1113 -
Osorio W. R. , Freitas E. S. , Peixoto L. C. , Spinelli J. E. , Garcia A. 2012 J. of Power Source http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.060 207 183 -
Chiou B. S. , Liu K. C. , Duh J. G. , Palanisamy P. S. 1990 IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology 13 267 -
Manko H. H. 2001 Solders and soldering McGraw-Hill New York 2 - 13,21-27
Islam M. N. , Chan Y. C. , Rizvi M. J. , Jillek W. 2005 J. of Alloys and Compounds http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.03.053 400 136 -
Schmitt P. , Kaiser P. , Savio C. , Tranitz M. , Eitner U. 2012 Energy Procedia 27 664 -
Yeo H. K. , Han K. H. 2009 J. of Alloys and Compounds http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.150 477 278 -
Wedi A. , Baither D. , Schmitz G. 2011 Scripta Materialia http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.12.026 64 689 -
Adamson A. W. , Gast A. P. 1997 Physical Chemistry of Surfaces John Wiley & Sons Inc New York 352 - 354
Tadmor R. 2004 Langmuir http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la049410h 20 7659 -
Chibowski E. , Terpilowski K. 2008 Journal of Colloid and Interface Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.10.059 319 505 -
de Gennes P. G. 1985 Reviews of Modern Physics http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.57.827 57 827 -
Zisman W. A. 1964 Contact Angle: Wettability, and Adhesion American Chem. Soc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ba-1964-0043.ch001 1 - 51
Green M. A. , Emery K. , King D. L. , Hishikawa Y. , Warta W. 2007 Progress in Photovoltaic: Research and Applications http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.741 15 35 -
Kazmerski L. L. 2006 J. Elec. Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2005.09.004 150 105 -
Pesavento P. V. , Chesterfield R. J. , Newman C. R. , Frisbie C. D. 2004 J. of Applied Physics http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1806533 96 7312 -