This paper uses the switching function approach to present a simple state model of the Viennatype rectifier. The approach introduces the relationship between the DClink neutral point voltage and the AC side phase currents. A novel direct power control (DPC) strategy, which is based on the sliding mode control (SMC) for Vienna I rectifiers, is developed using the proposed power model in the stationary
α

β
reference frames. The SMCbased DPC methodology directly regulates instantaneous active and reactive powers without transforming to a synchronous rotating coordinate reference frame or a tracking phase angle of grid voltage. Moreover, the required rectifier control voltages are directly calculated by utilizing the nonlinear SMC scheme. Theoretically, active and reactive power flows are controlled without ripple or cross coupling. Furthermore, the fixedswitching frequency is obtained by employing the simplified space vector modulation (SVM). SVM solves the complicated designing problem of the AC harmonic filter. The simplified SVM is based on the simplification of the space vector diagram of a threelevel converter into that of a twolevel converter. The dwelling time calculation and switching sequence selection are easily implemented like those in the conventional twolevel rectifier. Replacing the current control loops with power control loops simplifies the system design and enhances the transient performance. The simulation models in MATLAB/Simulink and the digital signal processorcontrolled 1.5 kW Viennatype rectifier are used to verify the fast responses and robustness of the proposed control scheme.
I. INTRODUCTION
Viennatype rectifiers have attracted wide attention in recent years because of their unidirectional power conversion ability that fulfills high power density requirements
[1]

[4]
. The Viennatype rectifiers offer many other advantages over conventional threelevel rectifiers. These advantages include requiring fewer active switching components in producing the same number of voltage levels, high input power factor, and low device voltage stress. This type of rectifier is also well known for its low control complexity and low sensing effort in terms of control system design and implementation
[1]
,
[2]
. Therefore, the Viennatype rectifier potentially reduces cost and provides more design flexibility for industry applications.
Extensive research has been conducted on rectifier control schemes in the past few years
[5]

[12]
. Furthermore, several control approaches have been presented for the Viennatype rectifier. These approaches include the hysteresis current control method
[8]
, constantfrequency integration control scheme
[11]
,
[12]
, conventional direct power control strategy,
[4]
,
[9]
and unity power factor control method
[6]
,
[7]
. These approaches have different disadvantages. The hysteresis current control has a varying switching frequency, which is its drawback. The unity power factor and the constantfrequency integration controls do not provide a closedloop regulation for the neutral point voltage balance of the DC link capacitors. Meanwhile, proportional–integral (PI) controllers are sensitive to changes of the component's parameters and load. The PI controllers experience lag in the sinusoid response for certain frequencies
[13]
. The direct power based on the SVM control has to track the phase angle of the grid voltage and transform to a synchronous rotating coordinate reference frame
[14]
,
[15]
. The sliding mode control methodology is an effective, highfrequency switching control for nonlinear systems with uncertainties. The method features simple implementation, disturbance rejection, strong robustness, and fast responses
[13]
. This paper proposes a sliding mode control (SMC)–direct power control (DPC) strategy to overcome the drawbacks of the existing methods in conventional direct power control and eliminate the drawback of a varying switching frequency using the simplified space vector modulation (SVM) schemes.
This paper is divided into six sections. Section I presents the introduction, gives the brief advantages of the Viennatype topology, and discusses several control methods for the Viennatype rectifiers. Section II introduces a highfrequency model suited for halfswitching frequency. This model is based on the operation analysis and the relationship between the neutral point voltage and the AC currents. The relationship states that the neutral point voltage balance is effectively managed by regulating the time of a redundant small vector pair during a duty cycle. Section III describes the power model of the Viennatype rectifier in the stationary
α

β
reference frame, which is used to analyze the direct power control schemes and design the sliding surface. The proposed control methodology is presented for the rectifier system based on Section III. The sliding mode control methodology is thoroughly demonstrated in Section IV. Relying on these two techniques, a sliding surface is defined in function of the instantaneous active and reactive powers, and the system is controlled to remain on the surface. Section V enlists the simplified SVM and the DClink neutralpoint voltage balance control method. Section VI demonstrates the simulation and experimental results. Section VII presents the conclusion.
II. OPERATING MODE OF THE VIENNATYPE RECTIFIER
The Vienna I rectifier topology is shown in
Fig. 1
. The rectifier comprises the main diode bridge and three bidirectional switching units. The three active switching units comprise diode rectifiers and active switches controlled to ensure sinusoidal AC current, steady DC voltage, and neutral point stabilization. From an operational view, the Vienna I rectifier is a threelevel nonregenerate boost rectifier referring to figures of threephase rectifiers. The mathematical model equations of the Vienna I rectifier are deduced using Eq. (1). Accordingly,
u_{a,b,c}
(
u_{a}
,
u_{b}
, and
u_{c}
) are the source voltages at the input side;
v_{aN}
,
v_{bN}
, and
v_{cN}
are the switch voltages;
v_{NO}
is the neutral point voltage across the middle point of the output capacitances and the main neutral; and
L
and
R
are the input inductance and the resistance values of the synchronous inductance, respectively. Meanwhile,
i_{p}
and
i_{n}
at the output side are the results added by the currents that flow in the upper diode bridge and those that flow under the diode bridge, respectively.
Topology of the threephase/level Vienna I rectifier method.
The active switch unit for the input stage is forced commutated current. Hence, the switch voltages (i.e.,
v_{aN}
,
v_{bN}
, and
v_{cN}
) are determined by both the identical switch state and the polarity of the AC phase current flowing the inductance. For example, the logic equation for phase A is given by Eq. (2) as follows:
Similarly, the logic equations of the other two phases are obtained to write for the three switch voltages in only one equation. The equation is derived as follows:
where
S
_{(a,b,c)p}
and
S
_{(a,b,c)n}
are defined by Eq. (4) as follows:
Assuming that the utility grid is a symmetrical balanced threephase system without any disturbance, using Eqs. (3) and (4) in Eq. (1) obtains the following equation:
According to Kirchhoff’s law,
i_{p}
and
i_{n}
for the output stage are given by Eq. (6) using Eq. (4) as follows:
The other system variables are described by straightforward equations concluding these switching variables with switching functions (i.e.,
S
_{(a,b,c)p}
,
S
_{(a,b,c)o}
, and
S
_{(a,b,c)n}
). The statespace equation is neither constant nor continuous because
S
_{(a,b,c)p}
,
S
_{(a,b,c)o}
, and
S
_{(a,b,c)n}
are functions that describe the precise dynamics of the switching state. Substituting Eqs. (3), (4), and (6) of the system dynamics into Eq. (1) obtains
where
Assuming the voltage balance of capacitors
C_{P}
and
C_{n}
, these 25 valid switch combination states are subset of the 27 states because the Vienna rectifier is a threelevel topology with only one zero state. The 25 voltage vectors are produced by the 25 possible switching state combinations. Accordingly, the 25 voltage vectors after Clark transformation to the stationary
α

β
reference system is divided into one zero vector, 12 small vectors composed by six redundant pairs, six medium, and six large vectors. The space vector representation of the 25 electrical states is presented in
Fig. 2
. A detailed description of the electrical states was also discussed in Refs.
[16]

[18]
. Theoretically, the two capacitors in the output side are assumed to have an equal capacity, and the grid is balance. The dynamics of the voltage balance
v_{cp}

v_{cn}
is derived from Eqs. (4), (6), and (7) as follows:
Space vectors of the Vienna rectifier; [S_{a} S_{b} S_{c}] takes values in {1, 0,1} .
Table I
presents the currents that flow into the neutral point of the DCbus capacitor bank and the
v_{NO}
values. The currents are differently supplied by the capacitors when the voltage levels are different at the capacitor terminals. The medium vectors are the major source of the capacitor voltage ripple found by observing the table that the zero vector and large vectors do not influence the neutral that the values of currents flowing into the neutral point are zeros
[19]
. Each pair of small vectors is also associated with two different switching states, which are referred to as positive and negative small vectors in Ref.
[17]
. Furthermore, the directions of the currents that flow into the neutral point have a direct relation to a particularly small vector. The charging and discharging times of each capacitor at the unity power factor, which are needed for rectification operations, are different. The charging and discharging profiles are repeated in every half cycle. This process produces unbalanced capacitor voltages between different levels. This type of capacitor unbalance voltage problem is resolved using different control strategies
[20]

[22]
. In this paper, regulating the time of a redundant small vector pair ensures that the neutral point voltage balance could be managed effectively
[21]
,
[22]
.
NEUTRAL POINT CURRENTS ANDvNOVALUES WITH RESPECT TO THE SWITCHING STATE VALUES
NEUTRAL POINT CURRENTS AND v_{NO} VALUES WITH RESPECT TO THE SWITCHING STATE VALUES
III. STANDARD DIRECT POWER CONTROL MODEL
The active and the reactive powers can be used to express three forms based on instantaneous reactive power theory. These three forms are the expressions described in the natural abc coordinate system, stationary reference frame, and rotating coordinate system. The values of the expressions are equal, and DC forms although the expressions differ in appearance. The active and the reactive power in this paper are described in the stationary reference frame. Hence, analyzing the circuit performances is convenient because the coupling of the active and the reactive powers is eliminated. Notably, the important difference between the Vienna and the traditional threelevel rectifiers in the power transmission is that the power is transferred only from the AC to the DC side in the former.
The equivalent circuit of the Vienna I rectifier in the stationary
α

β
reference frame is shown in
Fig. 3
. According to
Fig. 3
, the mathematic model is expressed as follows:
where
U_{αβ}
and
I_{αβ}
are the source voltages and the AC phase currents, respectively;
L
and
R
are the input inductance and resistance values of the synchronous inductance, respectively; and
P
and
Q
are the active and reactive powers of the input side, respectively.
Equivalent circuit of Vienna I rectifier in the stationary α  β reference frame.
The active and the reactive powers of the input side are expressed in the composite power method as follows:
where
The variations of the stator active and reactive powers are then obtained as follows:
The source voltage and the AC side current in the stationary reference frame during the network balance are obtained as follows when the utility grid is a symmetrical balanced threephase system:
where ｜
U_{αβ}
｜ and ｜
I_{αβ}
｜ and Iab are the amplitudes of the source voltage and the AC input current, respectively; and
θ
is the initial phase angle of the current. Based on Eq. (13), the variations of the source voltage are obtained as follows:
Subsequently, Eq. (15) is simplified as follows:
Based on Eqs. (9) and (14), the variations of the AC input current are obtained as follows:
Substituting Eqs. (11), (13), (15), and (17) into Eq. (12) to simplify the equation and eliminate the current components obtains the following equation:
The proposed direct power control scheme indicates that Eq. (18) is the key factor for the slide mode control.
IV. PROPOSED SMC–DPC STRATEGY
The outer loop is used to generate the current and power reference values when the inner loop is a current or a power loop control. Theoretically, the respective reference values of the reactive power loop and the reactive current loop are assigned as zeros to obtain unity power factor. The outer power loop is regulated by the PI controller that has been presented in detail in many papers
[21]
,
[23]
. Hence, this paper does not discuss the outer power loop control method.
According to the principle of the conventional DPC for threephase gridconnected rectifiers
[15]
,
[24]
,
[25]
, an appropriate voltage vector is selected at each sampling instant through the certain switching rule to restrict instantaneous active and reactive power variations within their required hysteresis bands. The active and the reactive power controllers are twolevel hysteresis comparators that generate discrete signals as inputs to the switching table based on the active and the reactive power errors
[26]
. The sector is located by the grid voltage vector. The switching signals of the Vienna I rectifier are directly generated according to a certain switching rule from a predefined lookup table
[27]
. Therefore, the original DPC algorithm is accomplished in the stationary reference frame without any pulse width modulation (PWM) module involved. The PWM module may achieve the maximum dynamic performance available
[28]
. However, the main disadvantage of this methodology is the varying switching frequency, which is not usually bounded and mainly depends on the sampling time, lookup table structure, load parameters, and operational state of the system. This methodology generates a dispersed harmonic spectrum that can hardly be used to design an effective line filter. Hence, the conventional lookup DPC strategy is not suitable for controlling the gridconnected Vienna rectifier. The problem of the varying switching frequency can be solved using the SVM. However, the direct power based on the SVM control has to track the phase angle of the grid voltage and transform to a synchronous rotating coordinate reference frame. Consequently, a new direct power control based on the SMC approach and the SVM scheme is proposed and designed for the gridconnected Vienna rectifier in the following section. The proposed SMC–DPC scheme is illustrated in
Fig. 3
, which illustrates the design of the control scheme with fixed switching frequency and high transient dynamics.
Schematic diagram of the proposed SMCbased DPC for the Vienna I rectifier under the grid voltage balance.
 A. Sliding Surface and Control Law
The switching surfaces are designed as integral forms [29] to track the predefined trajectories of the active and the reactive powers accurately and maintain the minimization of the steadystate error and the enhanced transient response. The surfaces can also be designed using the backstepping and nonlinear damping techniques [30]. The sliding surface is set as follows:
where
e_{P}
(
t
)=
P_{ref}

P
and
e_{Q}
(
t
)=
Q_{ref}

Q
are the errors between the references and the calculated values of the instantaneous active and reactive powers, respectively; and
K_{P}
and
K_{Q}
are the positive control gains. The manifolds
S
_{1}
= 0 and
S
_{2}
= 0 represent the precise tracking of the active and the reactive powers of the Vienna I rectifier. Accordingly,
and
when the system states reach the sliding manifold and remain on the surface. Subsequently, Eq. (19) is obtained as follows when the derivatives of the sliding surface S are equal to zero:
where
K_{P}
and
K_{Q}
are the positive control gains chosen to meet the requirements of the system. The preceding equation [Eq. (20)] ensures that the errors of the active and the reactive powers converge to zero. At the beginning, Eq. (19) is equal to zero. The system asymptotically converges to the origin with time constants of 1/
K_{P}
and 1/
K_{Q}
, and the convergence rates of the error dynamics are determined by
K_{P}
and
K_{Q}
.
The design task is then reduced to enforcing the sliding mode in the manifolds
S
_{1}
= 0 and
S
_{2}
= 0 using the discontinuous voltage space vectors of the Vienna I rectifier. The motion projections of the system [Eqs. (11) and (17)] on the S subspace are derived by differentiating
S
in Eq. (19) as follows:
Substituting for
P
,
Q
, and their derivatives using Eq. (17) leads to the following equation:
where
F
and
D
are calculated as follows:
A Lyapunov approach is usually used to derive the conditions in the SMC on the control law that drives the state orbit to the equilibrium manifold. The quadratic Lyapunov function is selected as follows:
The time derivative of
W
on the state trajectories of Eq. (22) is given as
The switching control law must be chosen so that the time derivative of
W
is definitely negative with
S
≠ 0 . Therefore, the control law is selected as follows:
where
k
_{1}
and
k
_{2}
are the positive control gains, and
sign
(
S
_{1}
) and
sign
(
S
_{2}
) are the switching functions of the sliding surfaces.
 B. Proof of the Stability
Having
is sufficient for the stability of the switching surface. Assuming that the following condition is satisfied, stability is obtained by setting the positive control gains as follows:
The time derivative of the Lyapunov function is definitely negative. Hence, the control system becomes asymptotically stable.
 C. Remedy for the Chattering Problem
The SMC method designed earlier fast tracks the instantaneous active and reactive powers of the Vienna I rectifiers. However, fast switching may bring about unexpected chattering. The highfrequency components of the unexpected chattering may give rise to unmodeled highfrequency system transients and lead to unforeseen instability. The discontinuous part of the controller is smoothed out by utilizing a boundary layer around the sliding surface to eliminate the problem. A continuous switching function around the sliding surface neighborhood is obtained as follows:
where
λ_{g}
is the width of the boundary layer, which is greater than zero (i.e., g = 1,2).
The Vienna rectifier output voltage reference produced by each switching state is represented by the stationary voltage vectors in space by utilizing Eqs. (25) and (27). The collection of these stationary voltage vectors is directly transferred to the SVM module to generate the required switching voltage vectors and their respective duration times
[27]
,
[28]
.
V. NEUTRALPOINT VOLTAGE BALANCE STRATEGY BASED ON SIMPLIFIED SVM
This paper proposes a new simplified SVM method for the Vienna I rectifier based on the simplification of the space vector diagram of a threelevel converter into that of a twolevel converter. All the remaining procedures necessary for the threelevel SVM are performed similar to those of a conventional twolevel inverter. Moreover, the execution time is greatly reduced. The DClink neutralpoint voltage balance control algorithms are more easily implemented. Numerous PWM strategies have been proposed to solve the neutralpoint voltage unbalance problem. Many of these techniques still use the complicated dwelling time calculation and the switching sequence selection method
[12]
,
[14]
,
[16]
. The neutralpoint voltage control algorithm is easily implemented, and the dwelling time calculation and the switching sequence selection are easily conducted similar to that of a conventional twolevel rectifier when the new PWM strategy is used.
Table I presents the currents that flow into the neutral point of the DCbus capacitor bank and the
v_{NO}
values. The space vector representation of the 25 electrical states in the
α

β
plane is illustrated in
Fig. 2
. The space vector diagram of the threelevel rectifier is composed of six small hexagons, which are conventional twolevel rectifiers (
Fig. 5
). Two steps have to be taken to simplify into the space vector module of a twolevel rectifier. First, one hexagon has to be selected among the six hexagons from the location of a given reference voltage. Second, the original reference voltage vector has to be subtracted by the amount of the center voltage vector of the selected hexagon
[12]
.
(a) Simplification of a threelevel space vector diagram; and (b) time division calculation.
The origin of a reference voltage vector is changed to the center voltage vector of the selected hexagon once the sector is determined. This change is performed by subtracting the center vector of the selected hexagon from the original reference vector.
Table II
summarizes these processes. The reference voltage vector is then redefined in the new small hexagon. Moreover, the dwelling times are calculated in the same method as that of the conventional twolevel SVM scheme. Take section 30˚ ~ 30˚ as an example [
Fig. 5
(b)]. The equivalent reference vector is sampled at a regular interval of time
T_{s}
. The sampled reference vector is approximated by timeaveraging the nearest three vectors (i.e.,
v_{x}
,
v_{y}
, and
v_{z}
).
T_{x}
,
T_{y}
, and
T_{z}
are the dwell times of the nearest three vectors. The expression is then given as follows according to the voltsecond balance principle:
SECTOR DEFINITION BY VOLTAGE VECTOR AND TRANSFORMATION OF REFERENCE VOLTAGE VECTOR
SECTOR DEFINITION BY VOLTAGE VECTOR AND TRANSFORMATION OF REFERENCE VOLTAGE VECTOR
The redundant vector
v_{z}
is used to charge or discharge the DClink midpoint given the existent neutral conduction path of the Vienna rectifier. Its vector realizations are represented by
and
. Subsequently, Eq. (28) is rewritten as follows:
where
f
is a time factor used to rearrange the time distribution of the redundant voltage vectors. The neutral point voltage in this case is controlled by adjusting the time distribution of the redundant voltage vectors in response to the voltage error and the current conditions
[21]
. The relationship between the currents that inject the neutral point and the neutral point voltage has been introduced in detail in Section II. Time factor
f
is generated using the PI regulator by detecting the Δ
V_{dc}
(
v_{cp}

v_{cn}
) . Hence, the neutral point voltage balance is effectively managed. The conduction time of the vectors is then finally determined as follows:
The dwelling times are calculated similar to that of the conventional twolevel SVM method if the reference voltage vector is redefined as explained in the previous section. The conduction time of the other five regions is summarized in
Table III
based on the preceding analysis.
BASIC EQUIVALENT VECTOR AND RESPECTIVE TIME OF SECTION I
BASIC EQUIVALENT VECTOR AND RESPECTIVE TIME OF SECTION I
X
,
Y
, and
Z
are respectively defined as follows
VI. SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
A detailed simulation is built in this section to verify the proposed control strategy on a MATLAB/SIMULINK platform. The circuit parameters are listed in
Table IV
used in the smallscale simulation model.
PARAMETERS USED IN THE SIMULATION
PARAMETERS USED IN THE SIMULATION
Accordingly,
Fig. 6
shows the transient response for a load stepup case to verify the dynamic performance. The load resistance steps in the case range from 50 Ω to 28 Ω. The simulation results indicate that the proposed control approach is stable under the loadstep transient condition. The steadystate waveforms of the Vienna I rectifiers, steadystate current, and differential voltage are shown in
Fig. 7
. Both the DClink voltages and the AC input currents are well controlled. Hence, the power factor is close to unity one. Furthermore, the neutral point voltage balance has been effectively controlled.
Simulation results of the load change with the load resistance steps from 50 Ω to 28 Ω. (a) Full DClink voltage (v_{dc} ) and two capacitor voltages (v_{cp} and v_{cn}). (b) Active power ( P ) and reactive power (Q). (c) Rectifier phase currents (i_{a},i_{b},andi_{c} ). (d) waveforms are the source voltage (u_{b} ) and phase b current (i_{b} ).
Simulation results of the steady state operating in 1.32 kW load with the SMCbased DPC. (a) Active power ( P ) and reactive power (Q); (b) full DClink voltage (v_{dc} ) and two capacitor voltages (v_{cp},v_{cn}); (c) rectifier phase currents (i_{a},i_{b},andi_{c}); (d) waveforms are the source voltage (u_{b} ) and phase b current (i_{b} ); (e) rectifier pole to the main point voltage (v_{bo}); and (f) rectifier poletopole voltage (v_{ab}).
A comparative simulation study of the DPC based on the PI controller is conducted using the same circuit parameters to verify the performance of the proposed DPC based on the SMC approach. The transient response for a load stepup is used to analyze the system response during the active and the reactive power steps in the two systems. The active power increases from 1.2 kW to 2.2 kW at 0.035 s [
Fig. 8
(a)]. The reactive power definitely has a small ripple. The active power changes in the same condition at 0.025 s [
Fig. 8
(b)]. Furthermore, the reactive power is still zero and has no ripple. Accordingly,
Fig. 9
provides the current harmonic spectra and the total harmonic distortions (THDs) for each control strategy to further compare the performances of the two control methods. The active and the reactive power waveforms are much smoother. In addition, they contain fewer ripples than the DPC based on the PI control method.
Simulation results of the active and the reactive power steps using two methods: (a) DPC based on the PI method and (b) DPC based on the SMC approach.
Simulation results of the current harmonic spectra and the total harmonic distortions. (a) DPC based on the PI method. (b) DPC based on the SMC approach.
An experimental prototype is built at laboratory scale to further illustrate and validate the proposed method. The input voltage is 110 Vrms/50 Hz. The inductors are 4 mH, and the switch frequency is 20 kHz. The two DClink capacitors connected in series at the DC side are 760 μF, and the load resistor is 50 Ω. Moreover, the DC reference voltage is 300 V. The differential waveforms are presented in
Fig. 10
. The transient waveforms of the DC voltage and the AC current are shown in
Fig. 10
(a). At the same time, the waveforms are used to depict steady state. The relations between the AC current and the AC source voltage are further illustrated in
Fig. 10
(b). The sinusoidal and the symmetrical currents are obtained with the same phase angle and source voltages when the rectifier changes from the diode rectification mode to the active control mode. The neutralpoint voltage balance of the DClink capacitors is well regulated by the method based on the simplified SVM [
Fig. 10
(c)]. The transient response for a load stepup case, in which the load resistance steps from the disconnected state to the normally steady state, is presented in
Fig. 10
(d).
Experimental results of startup and steady states. (a) Full dc voltage v_{dc} and ac current i_{b} . (b) Source voltage u_{b} and phase b current i_{b} . (c) Two capacitors voltage v_{cp}, v_{cn} ,(d) full dc voltage v_{dc} and ac current i_{b} with the load resistance steps from disconnected state to normally steady state.
The threephase current values and the threephase THDs for each control strategy are illustrated in
Fig. 11
. The THDs based on the SMC are lower than those on DPC based on the PI control method.
Experimental results of the threephase currents and the threephase current harmonic distortions. (a) DPC based on the PI method. (b) DPC based on the SMC approach.
VII. CONCLUSION
This paper establishes a new power model and a highfrequency model of the Vienna I rectifier based on the two models. Furthermore, a new control approach (i.e., DPC based on the SMC) is proposed. The required control voltage of the rectifier is directly calculated by utilizing the nonlinear SMC scheme with no cross coupling or rotating transformation. Moreover, the simplified SVM method is conducted similar to a conventional twolevel converter, and the execution time is greatly reduced. Therefore, the proposed scheme significantly reduces computation efforts, and a highquality line current waveform is obtained. The simplified SVM method indicates that the DClink neutralpoint voltage balance of the Vienna rectifier is more easily implemented by managing the time factor.
Compared with the DPC based on the PI controllers under the same conditions, the proposed approach exhibits better performance with fast response time and no active and reactive power ripples. The proposed control scheme and model are verified through simulation and experimental analysis. The results show that the SMCbased DPC is an effective method for use in the Vienna I rectifier system.
BIO
Hui Ma was born in Kaifeng, Henan Province, China in 1985. He received the M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering and Automation from Chang Chun University of Technology, Jilin, China in 2013. He is currently working toward his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at the South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China. His research interests include highpower density rectifiers, multilevel converters, and control strategies.
Yunxiang Xie was born in Shaoyang, Hunan Province, China in 1965. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Xian Jiaotong University, Xian, China in 1985, 1988, and 1991, respectively. He was a postdoctoral researcher from 1991 to 1994 and an associate professor from 1994 to 1999 in the School of Electrical Power, South China University of Tech, Guangzhou, China. He has been a professor of the same department at the South China University of Tech since 1999. He is a senior member of the China Electrotechnique Society and the director of the Electrical Energysaving Special Committee of the China Electrotechnical Society. While teaching in the Chinese Society of Mechanical Education and Chinese Power Industry Education Association of Electrical Engineering and Automation Committee, he authored or coauthored more than 170 published technical papers. His research areas include power electronics and control, including highpower density rectifiers, multilevel converters, active filter, and distributed power quality and control strategies.
Biaoguang Sun was born in Xinxiang, Henan Province, China, in 1984. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Automation from Henan Polytechnic University, Luoyang, China in 2008 and 2011, respectively. He is currently working toward a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at the South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China. His research interests include highpower density rectifiers, active filter, and distributed power quality.
Lingjun Mo was born in Huaihua, Hunan Province, China, in 1982. He received his B.S. degree in Electronic and Information Engineering from Ji Shou University, Jishou, China, in 2004. He is currently working toward his M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering at the South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China. His research interests include highpower density rectifiers, multilevel converters, and distributed power generation systems.
Kolar J. W.
,
Drofenik U.
“A new switching loss reduced discontinuous PWM scheme for a unidirectional threephase/switch/level boosttype PWM (VIENNA) rectifier”
in Telecommunication Energy Conference, 1999. INTELEC '99. The 21st International
1999
490 
499
Kolar J. W.
,
Drofenik U.
,
Zach F. C.
“Current handling capability of the neutral point of a threephase/switch/level boosttype PWM (VIENNA) rectifier”
in Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 1996. PESC '96 Record., 27th Annual IEEE
1996
1329 
1336
Alahuhtala J.
,
Tuusa H.
“Space vector modulation method for unidirectional fourwire threephase/level/switch (Vienna) rectifier”
in Power Electronics, 2007. ICPE '07. 7th Internatonal Conference on
2007
742 
748
Viitanen T.
,
Tuusa H.
“Space vector modulation and control of a unidirectional threephase/level/switch VIENNA I rectifier with LCLtype AC filter”
in Power Electronics Specialist Conference, 2003. PESC '03. 2003 IEEE 34th Annual, Vol. 3
2003
1063 
1068
Rixin L.
,
Fei W.
,
Burgos R.
,
Boroyevich D.
,
Dong J.
,
Zhang Di
2009
“Average modeling and control design for VIENNAtype rectifiers considering the DClink voltage balance”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
24
(11)
2509 
2522
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2009.2032262
Backman N.
,
Rojas R.
“Modern circuit topology enables compact power factor corrected threephase rectifier module”
in Telecommunications Energy Conference, 2002. INTELEC. 24th Annual International
2002
107 
114
Greul R.
,
Drofenik U.
,
Kolar J. W.
“Analysis and comparative evaluation of a threephase threelevel unity power factor yrectifier”
in Telecommunications Energy Conference, 2003. INTELEC '03. The 25th International
2003
421 
428
Kolar J. W.
,
Zach F. C.
1997
“A novel threephase utility interface minimizing line current harmonics of highpower telecommunications rectifier modules”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
44
(4)
456 
467
DOI : 10.1109/41.605619
Wang B.
,
Venkataramanan G.
,
Bendre A.
2007
“Unity power factor control for threephase threelevel rectifiers without current sensors”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.
43
(5)
1341 
1348
DOI : 10.1109/TIA.2007.904433
Greul R.
,
Round S. D.
,
Kolar J. W.
2007
“Analysis and control of a threephase, unity power factor Yrectifier”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
22
(5)
1900 
1911
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2007.904187
Chongming Q.
,
Smedley K. M.
2003
“Threephase unitypowerfactor starconnected switch (VIENNA) rectifier with unified constantfrequency integration control”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
18
(4)
952 
957
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2003.813759
Burgos R.
,
Rixin L.
,
Yunqing P.
,
Fei W.
,
Boroyevich D.
,
Pou J.
2008
“Space vector modulator for viennatype rectifiersbased on the equivalence between two and threelevel converters: A carrierbased implementation”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
23
(4)
1888 
1898
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2008.925180
Zhuang X.
,
Faz Rahman M.
2007
“Direct torque and flux regulation of an IPM synchronous motor drive using variable structure control approach”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
22
(6)
2487 
2498
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2007.909208
EloyGarcia J.
,
EloyGarcia J.
,
Alves R.
“DSPbased direct power control of a VSC with voltage angle estimation”
in Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America, 2006. TDC '06. IEEE/PES
2006
1 
5
Gong C.
,
Wan J.
,
Li K.
,
Huang S.
,
Shi L.
“Direct capacitor power control of dual PWM converter based on sliding mode variable structure”
in Innovative Smart Grid TechnologiesAsia(ISGT Asia),2012 IEEE
2012
1 
5
Chen H.
,
Zhang S.
,
Liu L.
“Control threephase starconnected switch threelevel rectifier considering alternative performance indices”
in Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA), 2012 10th World Congress on
2012
2506 
2511
Chenchen W.
,
Yongdong L.
2010
“Analysis and calculation of zerosequence voltage considering neutralpoint potential balancing in threelevel NPC converters”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
57
(7)
2262 
2271
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2009.2024093
Pouresmaeil E.
,
MontesinosMiracle D.
,
GomisBellmunt O.
2012
“Control scheme of threelevel NPC inverter for integration of renewable energy resources into AC grid”
IEEE Syst. J.
6
(2)
242 
253
DOI : 10.1109/JSYST.2011.2162922
Tekwani P. N.
,
Kanchan R. S.
,
Gopakumar K.
2005
“Currenterror spacevectorbased hysteresis PWM controller for threelevel voltage source inverter fed drives”
Electric Power Applications, IEE Proceedings
152
(5)
1283 
1295
DOI : 10.1049/ipepa:20050109
Xia C.
,
Gu X.
,
Shi T.
,
Yan Y.
2011
“Neutralpoint potential balancing of threelevel inverters in directdriven wind energy conversion system”
IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.
26
(1)
18 
29
DOI : 10.1109/TEC.2010.2060487
Pou J.
,
Boroyevich D.
,
Pindado R.
2002
“New feedforward spacevector PWM method to obtain balanced AC output voltages in a threelevel neutralpointclamped converter”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
49
(5)
1026 
1034
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2002.803207
Choi U.
,
Lee J.
,
Lee K.
2014
“New modulation strategy to balance the neutralpoint voltage for threelevel neutralclamped inverter systems”
IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.
29
(1)
91 
100
DOI : 10.1109/TEC.2013.2293502
Zhezhi Y.
,
Lingzhi Y.
,
Hanmei P.
,
Xi F.
,
Dong D.
“Study of simplified SVPWM algorithm based on threelevel inverter”
in Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, 2009. IPEMC '09. IEEE 6th International
2009
876 
881
Bouaziz B. B. F.
“Direct power control of gridconnected converters using sliding mode controller”
in Electrical Engineering and Software Applications (ICEESA), 2013 International Conference on
2013
1 
6
Chen W.
,
Chen W.
,
Zou Y.
,
Zou Y.
,
Xu L.
,
Xu L.
"Direct power control for Neutralpointclamped threelevel PWM rectifier”
in Industrial Technology 2008. ICIT 2008. IEEE International Conference on
2008
1 
6
Lu T.
,
Zhao Z.
,
Yuan L.
,
He F.
,
Zhang Y.
“Uncoupled direct power control based on improved sector selection algorithm for threelevel PWM rectifier”
in Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2013 IEEE
2013
1364 
1370
Jingjing H.
,
Aimin Z.
,
Xiaoju C.
,
Hang Z.
,
Jianhua W.
“A novel direct power control strategy of double hysteresis and multiple switching tables for rectifiers”
in Advanced Power System Automation and Protection (APAP), 2011 International Conference on
2011
36 
41
Hu J.
,
Nian H.
,
Hu B.
,
He Y.
,
Zhu Z. Q.
2010
“Direct active and reactive power regulation of DFIG using slidingmode control approach”
IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.
25
(4)
1028 
1039
DOI : 10.1109/TEC.2010.2048754
Aghatehrani R. K. R.
“Sliding mode control approach for voltage regulation in microgrids with DFIG based wind generations”
in Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2011 IEEE
2011
1 
8
Abad G.
,
Rodriguez M. A.
,
Poza J.
2008
“Threelevel NPC converterbased predictive direct power control of the doubly fed induction machine at low constant switching frequency”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
55
(12)
4417 
4429
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2008.2007829