This paper proposes a combined fuzzy adaptive sliding-mode voltage controller (FASVC) for a three-phase UPS inverter. The proposed FASVC encapsulates two control terms: a fuzzy adaptive compensation control term, which solves the problem of parameter uncertainties, and a sliding-mode feedback control term, which stabilizes the error dynamics of the system. To extract precise load current information, the proposed method uses a conventional load current observer instead of current sensors. In addition, the stability of the proposed control scheme is fully guaranteed by using the Lyapunov stability theory. It is shown that the proposed FASVC can attain excellent voltage regulation features such as a fast dynamic response, low total harmonic distortion (THD), and a small steady-state error under sudden load disturbances, nonlinear loads, and unbalanced loads in the existence of the parameter uncertainties. Finally, experimental results are obtained from a prototype 1 kVA three-phase UPS inverter system via a TMS320F28335 DSP. A comparison of these results with those obtained from a conventional sliding-mode controller (SMC) confirms the superior transient and steady-state performances of the proposed control technique.
I. INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, the nonlinear nature of electric loads is resulting in a strong demand for high-quality and reliable power sources from both customers and utilities
[1]
-
[5]
. To address this issue, uninterruptible power supplies (UPSs) are being extensively employed for critical loads such as communication systems, medical support systems, emergency systems, etc.
[6]
. For improving power quality through UPS systems, it is important to achieve sinusoidal output voltage waveforms with a fast voltage recovery capability and a very low total harmonic distortion (THD) regardless of the type of load. Typically, an inverter with an
LC
output filter in a UPS system is a suitable solution to fulfill this requirement. The main criteria for evaluating the regulation performance of the UPS inverter output voltage are a quick dynamic response, low THD, and small steady-state error. Moreover, various load conditions such as abrupt load changes, nonlinear loads, and unbalanced loads seriously harm the performance of UPS inverters. Thus, an appropriate control strategy is desired to sufficiently meet the performance criteria of UPS systems under any type of electrical load.
Recently, many researchers have presented a number of advanced control techniques for UPS systems
[7]
-
[20]
. The authors of
[7]
described a feedback linearization control scheme for the UPS inverter. This method focuses on achieving a low THD and a fast dynamic response without considering parameter uncertainties. In
[8]
and
[9]
, a repetitive control is applied to generate a high-quality sinusoidal output voltage. In general, this technique has problems such as a slow transient response and instability to error dynamics. In
[10]
, a model predictive control is suggested for regulating the UPS output voltage. This method utilizes a load current observer and has a small steady-state error. However, it reflects a high THD value in the output voltage under linear and nonlinear loads. In
[11]
, a hybrid PID control scheme with multiple loops is proposed. With the advantages of ensuring a good performance and easy implementation, these techniques require many trials to tune for the proper gains. According to
[12]
, a deadbeat control technique can provide a fast dynamic response and high accuracy. However, this scheme is very sensitive to the parameter uncertainties. In
[13]
, an
H
∞
loop–shaping control scheme is presented. This method has a simple structure and is robust under model uncertainties. Nevertheless, it is applied to a single-phase inverter. In
[14]
, an adaptive fuzzy control method is illustrated for a three-phase UPS system. Although this approach tracks the desired sinusoidal waveform regardless of being subjected to nonlinear loads, the large number of fuzzy rules employed raises the computational burden. In
[15]
, a hybrid fuzzy-repetitive control is applied for the UPS inverter. This scheme reveals a good transient response under load disturbance; whereas it is applied to a single-phase UPS inverter and its THD value is high for nonlinear loads. Next, a sliding-mode control method is employed on UPS inverters
[16]
-
[20]
. It is obvious from
[16]
-
[18]
that good UPS performance can be obtained by this control scheme. However, in
[16]
,
[17]
, the control scheme is only implemented on a single-phase inverter and in
[18]
the results for nonlinear loads are not provided. In
[19]
and
[20]
, the authors achieve a good voltage response, but the stability analysis is not presented.
This paper presents a fuzzy adaptive sliding-mode voltage controller (FASVC) for a three-phase UPS inverter. In this paper, the solution to parameter uncertainties is provided by a fuzzy adaptive compensation control term. In addition, the error dynamics of the system are stabilized by a sliding-mode feedback control term. A conventional load current observer is utilized to precisely estimate the load-current without using current sensors. The stability of the proposed FASVC is completely validated by the Lyapunov theory. Hence, in real applications, the proposed control technique can accomplish exceptional voltage regulation performance (such as a fast dynamic response, low THD, and small steady-state error) not only in the presence of parameter uncertainties, but also under sudden load changes, nonlinear loads, and unbalanced loads. A conventional sliding-mode controller (SMC) is also tested to highlight the outstanding performance of the suggested control approach. Finally, the validity of the proposed FASVC is demonstrated by comparative experimental results carried out on a prototype 1 kVA three-phase UPS inverter system using a TMS320F28335 DSP.
II. MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF THREE-PHASE UPS INVERTER SYSTEM
A circuit diagram of the three-phase UPS inverter system with an
LC
output filter is shown in
Fig. 1
. It consists of the following components: a DC-link (
VDC
), a three-phase IGBT inverter, three filter capacitors (
Cf
), three filter inductors (
Lf
), and a three-phase load.
The state equations of
Fig. 1
can be represented in the synchronously rotating
dq
reference frame by the following system model equations
[7]
:
Circuit diagram of a three-phase UPS inverter system.
where
iid
,
iiq
,
vid
, and
viq
are the
dq
-axis inverter currents and voltages,
iLd
,
iLq
,
vLd
, and
vLq
are the
dq
-axis load currents and voltages, and
are the time derivatives of the
dq
-axis inverter currents and load voltages, respectively. In addition,
ω
denotes the system angular frequency (
ω
=
2πf
), and
f
is the fundamental frequency of the load voltage.
It should be noted that:
-
1)iidqandvLdqare the state variables and measurable;
-
2)vidqis the control input;
-
3)iLdqis the unknown disturbance and changes very slowly during a sampling period[10];
-
4) The desireddq-axis load voltagesvLd*andvLq*are constant during a sampling period and then their time derivatives can be set to zero.
III. FUZZY ADAPTIVE SLIDING-MODE VOLTAGE CONTROLLER DESIGN AND STABILITY ANALYSIS
This section thoroughly presents the proposed FASVC algorithm and its stability analysis by utilizing the system model (1). First, the errors of the
dq
-axis inverter currents (
iid
,
iiq
) and load voltages (
vLd
,
vLq
) are defined as follows:
where
eid
,
eiq
,
iid
*
, and
iiq
*
are the errors and reference values of the
dq
-axis inverter currents, respectively. Similarly,
eLd
,
eLq
,
vLd
*
, and
vLq
*
are the errors and reference values of the
dq
-axis load voltages, respectively. Then, the following error dynamics can be derived:
where
ud
,
uq
,
vind
, and
vinq
are the system uncertainty terms and the control inputs, respectively, and
γd
and
γq
denote positive numbers.
The system uncertainty terms (
ud
,
uq
) are given by:
It should be noticed from (4) that
ud
and
uq
contain the time derivative terms (
) that cannot be computed in a straightforward manner due to system noises. In addition, it is assumed that
Lf
has some uncertainties because of the nonlinear magnetic properties. In practice, the exact estimation of the uncertainty terms (
ud
,
uq
) is required instead of directly using the time derivatives of
iid
*
and
iiq
*
.
Next, the control inputs (
vind
,
vinq
) can be written as:
where
ufad
,
ufaq
,
usmd
, and
usmq
are the
dq
-axis fuzzy adaptive compensation control terms and the
dq
-axis sliding-mode feedback control terms, respectively.
Proposition 1:
Assume that the filter capacitance
Cf
is known. In addition, let the compensation control terms (
ufad
,
ufaq
) and the feedback control terms (
usmd
,
usmq
) be obtained by the following control laws as:
where
σd
and
σq
are sliding surfaces, and
τd
,
τq
,
εd
, and
εq
are positive constants. Then
eLd
and
eLq
converge to zero.
Proof:
The given control law (7) is known as the sliding-mode control term. Its stability analysis can be divided into two tasks. The first task is to determine the stability of the reduced-order sliding-mode dynamics, while the second task is to verify the reachability condition. By setting
, the second-order sliding-mode dynamics restricted to the sliding surface can be derived as:
which is asymptotically stable. Therefore, it should be shown that the reachability condition is satisfied. To this end, the Lyapunov function
V0(t)
can be defined as:
Its time derivative is expressed as:
The following equation can be obtained from (3), (6), (7), and (8):
Substituting (11) into (10) yields:
The above compensation control law (6) requires accurate knowledge of
ud
and
uq
due to the parameter uncertainties. Therefore, the following
ith
fuzzy rules for the two fuzzy models (
ηd
and
ηq
) are applied to approximate
ud
and
uq
, respectively.
-
Fuzzy rule iforηd: IFxjisFji, THENηdisSdi.
-
Fuzzy rule iforηq: IFxjisFji, THENηqisSqi.
where
j
=
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
, and
i
=
1
,
2
,…,
r
, and
r
is the total number of fuzzy rules.
xj
represents the state variables (i.e.,
x1
=
vLd
,
x2
=
vLq
,
x3
=
iid
,
x4
=
iiq
).
Fji
denotes the fuzzy sets associated with
xj
.
Sdi
and
Sqi
are the fuzzy singletons for
ηd
and
ηq
, respectively. The membership functions
gji
(
xj
) are used to further characterize the fuzzy sets
Fji
. The final output (
ηd
,
ηq
) of the above fuzzy models can be inferred by using a standard fuzzy inference method that consists of a singleton fuzzifier, a product fuzzy inference, and a weighted average defuzzifier.
where
ξd
= [
ξd
1
, ··· ,
ξdr
]
T
= [
Sd
1
, ··· ,
Sdr
]
T
and
ξq
= [
ξq
1
, ··· ,
ξqr
]
T
= [
Sq
1
, ··· ,
Sqr
]
T
are the adaptable parameter vectors, and
h
= [
h
1
, ··· ,
hr
]
T
is the fuzzy basis function. Moreover, the vector
hi
is considered as the normalized weight of each IF-THEN rule, which satisfies both
hi
≥ 0 and
. Thus,
hi
can be expressed as:
It is assumed that
ξ*d
and
ξ*q
are the optimal parameter vectors. According to standard results
[23]
,
[24]
, a fuzzy system can uniformly approximate nonlinear functions to an arbitrary accuracy. As a result, if the searching spaces for
ηd
and
ηq
are sufficiently large, the following inequalities can be assumed:
Now, the fuzzy adaptive compensation control terms (
ufad
,
ufaq
) and the sliding-mode feedback control terms (
usmd
,
usmq
) can be written by:
where
λdi
and
λqi
are positive design parameters. Then, the following can be established:
Theorem 1:
Assume that the filter capacitance
Cf
is known. Let the control law be given by (16) and (17). Then
eid
,
eiq
,
eLd
, and
eLq
converge to zero, and
ξdi
and
ξqi
are bounded.
Proof:
Since
Proposition 1
indicates that the linear sliding surface (8) guarantees the asymptotic stability of the sliding-mode dynamics, it should be demonstrated that
σd
and
σq
converge to zero. The Lyapunov function can be defined as:
where
. Now the time derivative of (18) can be expressed as follows:
On the other hand, (16) and (17) imply that:
Also, the following equation can be derived from (3) and (20):
If the inequalities in (15) are used, substituting (20), (21), and (22) into (19) yields:
By applying the integration on both sides of (23):
or:
Then, (25) can be redefined as:
where
V0(t)
≥ 0 is used. Then, the following inequalities can be derived:
which implies that
σd
,
σq
∈
L
2
. Since
as shown in (23),
V
(
t
) does not increase and is upper bounded as
V
(
t
) ≤
V
(0). This entails that
σd
,
σq
∈
L
∞
, and
ξdi
,
ξqi
∈
L
∞
. Hence, it can be concluded by
[21]
,
[24]
,
[25]
, and
[26]
that the closed-loop system is stable.
Fig. 2
shows a block diagram of the proposed FASVC. In this figure, the load current information is estimated through a conventional load current observer
[27]
(Kalman-Bucy optimal observer) to reduce the number of current sensors and enhance system reliability. Therefore, the load currents (
iLd
,
iLq
) in (2) are substituted with their estimated values (
), respectively.
Block diagram of the proposed FASVC.
Remark 1:
This remark discusses the selection process of the controller gains. In this paper, for achieving a fast convergence and a rapid transient response, the adaptive gains are tuned to large values. According to (16), these adaptive gains are inversely proportional to
λdi
and
λqi
. As a result, smaller values of
λdi
and
λqi
can result in larger values of the adaptive gains and vice versa. On the other hand, the sliding surfaces (
σd
and
σq
) are further defined to obtain the sliding-mode feedback control terms (
usmd
and
usmq
) given in (17), and these feedback control terms can be regarded as a PD controller. In this context, the control parameters
γd
,
γq
,
τd
, and
τq
can be designed based on the tuning rule of
[22]
. As a final point, all of the control parameters (
γd
,
γq
,
τd
,
τq
,
λdi
, and
λqi
) can be tuned according to the following steps: 1) Tune the parameters (
γd
,
γq
,
τd
, and
τq
) based on the tuning rule of
[22]
; 2) Set quite large values for
λdi
and
λqi
; 3) Reduce
λdi
and
λqi
by a small amount; 4) End the tuning process if the present control parameters give satisfactory transient and steady-state performances, otherwise go back to
Step 3
.
Remark 2:
As described in (16) and (17), the proposed FASVC consists of two control terms: a fuzzy adaptive compensation control term (
ufad
,
ufaq
) and a sliding-mode feedback control term (
usmd
,
usmq
). The first term takes parameter uncertainties into account. Meanwhile, the other term stabilizes the error dynamics of the system. Therefore, the proposed control scheme can achieve good performance in the existence of the parameter uncertainties.
IV. EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION
- A. Prototype Overview
To verify the performance of the proposed control scheme, a prototype 1 kVA three-phase UPS inverter system with a TMS320F28335 DSP is tested. The parameters of the three-phase UPS inverter are listed in
Table I
. Note that the values of the
LC
output filter have a cutoff frequency of 620 Hz. Normally, larger values of the filter elements (
Lf
and
Cf
) can realize better filter performance. On the other hand, large values of
Lf
and
Cf
can increase the system cost and volume. In addition, a large current flows into
Cf
even under no load. Therefore, selecting the
LC
output filter parameters always follows a trade-off between their pros and cons. The guidelines for choosing an
LC
output filter for the pulse width modulation inverters are available in
[28]
.
PARAMETERS OF A THREE-PHASE UPS INVERTER
PARAMETERS OF A THREE-PHASE UPS INVERTER
A complete block diagram of a three-phase UPS inverter system with the proposed FASVC is shown in
Fig. 3
. In this figure, both the inverter currents (
iiabc
) and load voltages (
vLabc
) in the stationary
abc
reference frame are sensed, and then transformed to values in the synchronously rotating
dq
reference frame by Park’s transformation (
vLdq
,
iidq
). These values are first used at the conventional load current observer. After that, the estimated load currents (
) and the reference load voltages (
vLd
*
,
vLq
*
) are injected into the proposed FASVC. Then, after the
dq
-axis voltage control inputs (
vind
,
vinq
) are converted to quantities (
vinα
,
vinβ
) in the stationary
αβ
reference frame using an inverse Park’s transformation. Six gate pulses are generated to drive the three-phase UPS inverter by using the space vector pulse-width modulation (SVPWM) technique with sampling and switching frequencies of 5 kHz.
Overall block diagram of a prototype 1 kVA UPS inverter system.
- B. Fuzzy Rules and Controller Gains
In order to create the fuzzy models
ηd
and
ηq
given in (16), the total numbers of fuzzy rules for the four state variables (
x1
,
x2
,
x3
, and
x4
) are optimized as:
where
F
denotes the fuzzy sets and
m
is the number of state varaibles.
The fuzzy sets are characterized by two linguistic terms (negative
N
and positive
P
) for each state variable and designed in the form of the following membership functions:
-
gN1(x1) =e-(x1+ 160)2/(320)2,gP1(x1) =e-(x1- 160)2/(320)2
-
gN2(x2) =e-(x2+ 5)2/(10)2,gP2(x2) =e-(x3- 5)2/(10)2
-
gN3(x3) =e-(x3+ 6)2/(12)2,gP3(x3) =e-(x3- 6)2/(12)2
-
gN4(x4) =e-(x4+ 2)2/(4)2,gP4(x4) =e-(x4- 2)2/4)2
where the Gaussian functions are utilized as membership functions due to their simplicity. In addition, the constant values (160, 5, 6, and 2) are chosen by considering the constraints of each state variable with a small additional tolerance.
Briefly, the sixteen fuzzy rules for
ηd
are:
r1
: IF
x1
is
N1
and
x2
is
N2
and
x3
is
N3
and
x4
is
N4
, THEN
ηd
is
ξd1
.
r2
: IF
x1
is
N1
and
x2
is
N2
and
x3
is
N3
and
x4
is
P4
, THEN
ηd
is
ξd2
.
r3
: IF
x1
is
N1
and
x2
is
N2
and
x3
is
P3
and
x4
is
N4
, THEN
ηd
is
ξd3
.
r16
: IF
x1
is
P1
and
x2
is
P2
and
x3
is
P3
and
x4
is
P4
, THEN
ηd
is
ξd16
.
In addition, the sixteen fuzzy rules for
ηq
are:
r1
: IF
x1
is
N1
and
x2
is
N2
and
x3
is
N3
and
x4
is
N4
, THEN
ηq
is
ξq1
.
r2
: IF
x1
is
N1
and
x2
is
N2
and
x3
is
N3
and
x4
is
P4
, THEN
ηq
is
ξq2
.
r3
: IF
x1
is
N1
and
x2
is
N2
and
x3
is
P3
and
x4
is
N4
, THEN
ηq
is
ξq3
.
r16
: IF
x1
is
P1
and
x2
is
P2
and
x3
is
P3
and
x4
is
P4
, THEN
ηq
is
ξq16
.
Finally, the controller gains are tuned via extensive simulation studies based on
Remark 1
as:
γd
=
γq
= 130,
τd
=
τq
= 15,
εd
=
εq
= 70, and
λdi
=
λqi
= 55x10
-5
.
- C. Comparative Experimental Results
Experimental results are demonstrated under two scenarios to fully highlight the transient and steady-state performances of the proposed FASVC as compared to the conventional SMC.
Scenario 1
shows the transient-state response and the steady-state response when a three-phase resistive load with a 40 Ω resistance is instantaneously applied, i.e., no load to full load.
Scenario 2
reveals the steady-state response when a three-phase diode rectifier is applied to the load terminals, which has the following
RLC
values:
RL
= 90 Ω,
LL
= 10 mH, and
CL
= 60 μF. Meanwhile,
Scenario 3
presents the performance at the steady-state when an unbalanced resistive load is connected to the inverter output terminals, i.e., only phase
c
is opened. In this paper, 30% reductions in both
Lf
and
Cf
are assumed as the parameter uncertainties under each scenario to clearly demonstrate the transient and steady-state performances of the proposed FASVC and the conventional SMC.
Figs. 4
and
5
demonstrate the relative experimental results of both the proposed and the conventional control strategies under the three scenarios mentioned above. Both figures illustrate the waveforms of the load phase voltages (
vLa
,
vLb
,
vLc
), inverter phase currents (
iia
,
iib
,
iic
), and estimated load phase currents (
). Note that only (
iia
and
) for
Scenarios 1&2
and (
iia
,
iib
,
iic
and
)for
Scenario 3
are exposed. Based on
Figs. 4
and
5
, the experimental results can be described as follows:
Figs. 4
(a) and
5
(a) show the dynamic responses for
Scenario 1
.
Fig. 4
(a) depicts that the load voltage waveforms are slightly distorted and recovered to the steady-state within 0.5 ms. Meanwhile,
Fig. 5
(a) shows that it takes 1.2 ms for the load voltage waveforms to be restored to the steady-state. In
Figs. 4
(b) and
5
(b), the steady-state performances under
Scenario 2
are depicted. More specifically, it can be seen that the proposed FASVC has pure sinusoidal load voltage waveforms with a smaller THD (1.08%) than the conventional SMC (2.83%).
Figs. 4
(c) and
5
(c) elaborate the responses under
Scenario 3
at the steady-state. The load voltage waveforms presented in
Fig. 4
(c) attain a 0.47% lower THD value and reflect a sinusoidal behavior with 1.32% less steady-state error when compared with the voltage waveforms shown in
Fig. 5
(c).
Table II
summarizes the THDs and steady-state rms errors of both the proposed FASVC and the conventional SMC after each scenario reaches the steady-state condition. It can be seen in
Table II
that under all three scenarios, the THDs and steady-state errors of the proposed FASVC (i.e., about 1.10% and 0.50%, respectively) are significantly improved when compared to the conventional SMC (i.e., about 2.90% and 2.30%, respectively).
Experimental results of the proposed FASVC with –30% parameter uncertainties in Lf and Cf. (a) Sudden load disturbance (i.e., 0% to 100%). (b) Nonlinear load (i.e., Crest factor = 1.62). (c) Unbalanced load (i.e., Phase c open).
STEADY-STATE PERFORMANCES OF COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
STEADY-STATE PERFORMANCES OF COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Experimental results of the conventional SMC with –30% parameter uncertainties in Lf and Cf. (a) Sudden load disturbance (i.e., 0% to 100%). (b) Nonlinear load (i.e., Crest factor = 1.62). (c) Unbalanced load (i.e., Phase c open).
V. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, a combined fuzzy adaptive sliding-mode voltage controller (FASVC) was proposed for a three-phase UPS inverter. The proposed FASVC was insensitive to parameter uncertainties due to the use of a fuzzy adaptive compensation control term. In addition, the error dynamics of the system were stabilized by a sliding-mode feedback control term. The stability of the proposed method was analytically proven by the Lyapunov theory. To evaluate the performance of the proposed FASVC, a prototype 1 kVA three-phase UPS inverter test-bed with a TMS320F28335 DSP was constructed and tested. Then, the outstanding performances (i.e., quicker voltage recovery time after a step load change, reduced THD under a nonlinear load, and smaller steady-state error for an unbalanced load) of the proposed control technique were verified through a comparison with the results obtained from a conventional SMC under three different load scenarios, and in the presence of parameter uncertainties.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. 2012R1A2A2A01045312).
BIO
Khawar Naheem received his B.S. degree in Electrical Power Engineering from the Comsats Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Abbottabad, Pakistan, in 2011. He is currently pursuing his M.S. degree in the Division of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea. His current research interests are the control of distributed generation systems using renewable energy sources, electric vehicles (EVs), micro/smart-grid systems, and DSP-based electric machine drives.
Young-Sik Choi received his B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea in 2009. He is presently pursuing his Ph.D. degree in the Division of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dongguk University. His current research interests include power conversion systems and drives for electric vehicles (EVs).
Francis Mwasilu received his B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, in 2008. From 2009 to 2011, he worked as a Utilities Engineer at JTI-Tanzania. He is presently pursuing his Ph.D. degree in the Division of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea. His current research interests include distributed generation systems, electric vehicles (EVs), and renewable energy sources integration in modern power systems.
Han Ho Choi received his B.S. degree in Control and Instrumentation Engineering from Seoul National University (SNU), Seoul, Korea, in 1988, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea, in 1990 and 1994, respectively. He is currently with the Division of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea. His current research interests include control theory and its application to real world problems.
Jin-Woo Jung received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea, in 1991 and 1997, respectively. He received his Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA, in 2005. From 1997 to 2000, he was with the Home Appliance Research Laboratory, LG Electronics Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea. From 2005 to 2008, he worked at the R&D Center and with the PDP Development Team, Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Korea, as a Senior Engineer. Since 2008, he has been an Associate Professor with the Division of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea. His current research interests include DSP-based electric machine drives, distributed generation systems using renewable energy sources, and power conversion systems and drives for electric vehicles (EVs).
Roy S.
,
Umanand L.
2011
“Integrated magnetics-based multisource quality ac power supply,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
58
(4)
1350 -
1358
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2010.2049712
Han J. H.
,
Lee K.
,
Song C. S.
,
Jang G.
,
Byeon G.
,
Park C. H.
2014
“A new assessment for the total harmonic contributions at the point of common coupling,”
J. Electr. Eng. Technol.
9
(1)
6 -
14
DOI : 10.5370/JEET.2014.9.1.006
Kang H. K.
,
Yoo C. H.
,
Chung I. Y.
,
Won D. J.
,
Moon S. I.
2012
“Intelligent coordination method of multiple distributed resources for harmonic current compensation in a microgrid,”
J. Electr. Eng. Technol.
7
(6)
834 -
844
DOI : 10.5370/JEET.2012.7.6.834
Lee J. H.
,
Jeong H. G.
,
Lee K. B
2012
“Performance improvement of grid-connected inverter systems under unbalanced and distorted grid voltage by using a PR controller,”
J. Electr. Eng. Technol.
7
(6)
918 -
925
DOI : 10.5370/JEET.2012.7.6.918
Salim C.
,
Toufik B. M.
,
Amar G.
2011
“Harmonic current compensation based on three-phase three-level shunt active filter using fuzzy logic current controller,”
J. Electr. Eng. Technol.
6
(5)
595 -
604
DOI : 10.5370/JEET.2011.6.5.595
Zhao B.
,
Song Q.
,
Liu W.
,
Xiao Y.
2013
“Next-generation multi-functional modular intelligent UPS system for smart grid,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
60
(9)
3602 -
3618
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2012.2205356
Kim D. E.
,
Lee D. C.
2010
“Feedback linearization control of three-phase UPS inverter systems,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
57
(3)
963 -
968
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2009.2038404
Escobar G.
,
Stankovic A. M.
,
Mattavelli P.
2004
“An adaptive controller in stationary reference frame for D-statcom in unbalanced operation,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
51
(2)
401 -
409
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2004.825270
Escobar R.
,
Valdez A. A.
,
Leyva-Ramos J.
,
Mattavelli P.
2007
“Repetitive-based controller for a UPS inverter to compensate unbalance and harmonic distortion,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
54
(1)
504 -
510
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2006.888803
Cortés P.
,
Ortiz G.
,
Yuz J. I.
,
Rodrisguez J.
,
Vazquez S.
,
Franquelo L. G.
2009
“Model predictive control of an inverter with output LC filter for UPS applications,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
56
(6)
1875 -
1883
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2009.2015750
Li C.
,
Ji S. M.
,
Tan D. P.
2013
“Multiple-loop digital control method for a 400-Hz inverter system based on phase feedback,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
28
(1)
408 -
417
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2188043
Mattaveli P.
2005
“An improved deadbeat control for UPS using disturbance observers,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
52
(1)
206 -
212
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2004.837912
Lee T. S.
,
Chiang S. J.
,
Chang J. M.
2001
“H∞loop-shaping controller designs for the single-phase UPS inverters,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
16
(4)
473 -
481
Hsu F. Y.
,
Fu L. C.
1996
“Adaptive fuzzy control for uninterruptible power supply with three-phase PWM inverter,”
in Proc. IEEE Fuzzy Systems Symposium
188 -
193
Xu D. S.
,
Yong K.
,
Jian C.
2004
“An algorithm for the output waveform compensation of SPWM inverters based on fuzzy-repetitive control,”
J. Electr. Eng.
55
(3-4)
64 -
70
Kukrer O.
,
Komurcugil H.
,
Doganalp A.
2009
“A three-level hysteresis function approach to the sliding-mode control of single-phase UPS inverters,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
56
(9)
3477 -
3486
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2009.2016512
Komurcugil H.
2012
“Rotating sliding line based sliding-mode control for single-phase UPS inverters,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
59
(10)
3719 -
3726
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2011.2159354
Wai R. J.
,
Lin C. Y.
2011
“Dual active low-frequency ripple control for clean-energy power-conditioning mechanism,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
58
(11)
5172 -
5185
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2011.2126533
Dai M.
,
Marwali M. N.
,
Jung J. W.
,
Keyhani A.
2008
“A three-phase four-wire inverter control technique for a single distributed generation unit in island mode,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
23
(1)
322 -
331
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2007.911816
Marwali M. N.
,
Keyhani A.
2004
“Control of distributed generation systems–part I: voltages and currents control,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
19
(6)
1541 -
1550
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2004.836685
Lewis F. L.
,
Abdallah C. T.
,
Dawson D. M.
1993
Control of Robot Manipulators
Macmillan
Ch. 2
Astrom K. J.
,
Witternmark B.
1990
Computer-Controlled Systems: Theory and Design
Prentice Hall
Ch. 8
Castro J. L.
1995
“Fuzzy logic controllers are universal approximators,”
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern.
25
(4)
629 -
635
DOI : 10.1109/21.370193
Wang L. X.
1993
“Stable adaptive fuzzy control of nonlinear systems,”
IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.
1
(2)
146 -
155
DOI : 10.1109/91.227383
Lin W. S.
,
Chen C. S.
2002
“Robust adaptive sliding-mode control using fuzzy modelling for a class of uncertain MIMO nonlinear systems,”
IEE Proc. Electr. Power Appl.
149
(149)
193 -
201
Lin F.
2007
Robust Control Design: An Optimal Control Approach
John Willey & Sons
Ch. 4
Kim H.
,
Sul S. K.
2011
“A novel filter design for output LC filters of PWM inverters,”
Journal of Power Electronics
11
(1)
74 -
81
DOI : 10.6113/JPE.2011.11.1.074