A novel auxiliary resonant commutated pole (ARCP) link for threephase PWM voltagefed converter is presented. The ARCP link consists of two auxiliary switches, one resonant inductance, and six diodes, which is simpler than the conventional ARCP designs. Based on the phase and amplitude control, the proposed converter can take a minimum switching times PWM method, which results in reduced losses and a simplified control. In addition, the zerovoltage resonance modes are analyzed. Finally, simulation and experimental results show that the system can realize zerovoltage switching with a unity power factor.
I. INTRODUCTION
In order to obtain high power factor transmission of electric power and reduced switching loss simultaneously, softswitching PWM converters have become an effective solution among modern power conversion devices for suppressing harmonic pollution, restraining electromagnetic interference and increasing efficiency.
There are a variety of topologies and control strategies for designing three phase soft switching PWM converters. Among these, the zerovoltage switching (ZVS) converters can be broadly divided into two categories according to the different bus links in achieving resonance: the resonant DC link system (RDCLS)
[1]

[3]
and the resonant pole system (RPS)
[4]

[10]
. The RDCLS uses a resonant circuit composing of resonant inductors paralleled on the DC bus and snubber capacitors paralleled on the power switches, which achieves a periodical zero voltage on the DC bus as a basis for the power switches turningon. This solution is simple in structure. However, it affects utilization of the bus voltage. In comparison the RPS changes the resonant circuit being with resonant inductors paralleled in threephase bridges on AC bus links, which scales the bridge input voltage either at zero or at bus working voltage periodically, and so the power switches acts at zero voltage.
The auxiliary resonant commutated pole (ARCP) converters among the RPS solutions have some advantages, such as higher efficiency, lower voltage or current stress to the power switches and flywheel diodes. However, for the conventional ARCP threephase PWM converter, each bridge with one resonant circuit has six auxiliary switches, three resonant inductors and six diodes, which lead to a complex structure. Some papers suggests a simplification of the structure of RPS converters so as to promoting their application
[11]

[17]
.
A simplified ARCP for threephase PWM rectifier is proposed in this paper, which includes two auxiliary switches, one resonant inductor and six diodes. Based on amplitude and phase control, the rectifier applies the least switching times PWM mode, which ensures a normal resonance to simplify the control, and improved efficiency. The six power switches in the threephase bridges act under the ZVS state, while the two auxiliary switches work under the zero current switching (ZCS) state. The effectiveness of the proposed strategy is demonstrated through simulation and experiment results for a 1kW PWM rectifier.
II. MAIN CIRCUIT AND PWM CONTROL STRATEGY
Fig. 1
shows the main circuit of the proposed ARCP threephase PWM rectifier, where
e
_{R}
,
e
_{S}
and
e
_{T}
refer to the threephase AC source. The threephase bridge circuit includes series inductances
L
_{R}
,
L
_{S}
and
L
_{T}
, power switches V
_{1}
~V
_{6}
, flywheel diodes VD
_{1}
~VD
_{6}
, and snubber capacitors
C
_{1}
~
C
_{6}
. The resonance circuit is composed of diodes VD
_{A1}
~VD
_{A3}
and VD
_{B1}
~VD
_{B3}
, auxiliary switches V
_{A}
and V
_{B}
, splitcapacitor capacitors
C
_{d1}
and
C
_{d2}
, and a resonant inductor
L
_{r}
. The DC voltage on the load is defined as
E
_{d}
and
E
_{d}
/2 as the voltage on
C
_{d1}
and
C
_{d2}
respectively. The fundamental components of the phase voltage after PWM are
u
_{R}
,
u
_{S}
and
u
_{T}
. The PWM control strategies of the rectifier are described in detail hereafter.
Main circuit of the ARCP rectifier.
The rectifier applies amplitude and phase control to achieve power factor correction while the phase voltage and phase current are kept in phase. This complies with the following expressions:
Where
M
is the modulation ratio, and
θ
_{0}
is the offset angle between
u
_{R}
and
e
_{R}
.
Fig. 2
shows the key waveforms, where
i
_{R}
,
i
_{S}
and
i
_{T}
are the threephase currents from the source, and
u
_{R}
’,
u
_{S}
’ and
u
_{T}
’ are the threephase modulation waves. On the other hand,
u_{G}
_{1}
~
u_{G}
_{6}
,
u_{G}
_{A}
and
u_{G}
_{B}
are the gate drive signals of the power switches V
_{1}
~V
_{6}
, V
_{A}
and V
_{B}
. It can be seen from
Fig.1
that each power switch in the threephase bridges has one paralleled snubber capacitor that prevents immediate voltage changes. The switches always turn off in the ZVS state. Therefore, only turningon of the power devices in the ZVS state is necessary. To conveniently achieve closing of the switches at the same time, in
Fig.2
the modulation method adopts a sawtooth carrier with alternative positive and negative slopes instead of the conventional triangular carrier. It is defined here that when it flows to the power device, the phase current is positive and the sawtooth carrier adopts a positive slope, or phase current is negative and the sawtooth carrier adopts a negative slope. The turningon of the power devices can be converged at the vertical edges of the sawtooth carrier. When compared with the triangular carrier, the resonance control becomes easier and is reduces 1/3 resonant times.
Key waveforms of proposed converter.
The minimum switching time PWM mode is adopted to ensure auxiliary resonant converting. In
Fig.2
the per cycle of [0, 2] can be divided into six sections according to the difference between a phase current direction to the other two phase currents. For instance in section 2, since the phase R current is at maximum, it flows though diode VD
_{1}
in parallel with switch V
_{1}
. Then in the phase R bridge, the two power switches V
_{1}
and V
_{4}
are kept off. Therefore, the switching times can be cut down 1/3 when compared to the conventional methods. The control strategy achieves easier control of the system.
Three phase voltage modulation wave signals
u
_{R}
’,
u
_{S}
’ and
u
_{T}
’ are generated by the line voltage. According to the six sections mentioned above and by combining equation (1), the following expressions can be derived:
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Section 5
Section 6
From the above analysis, by comparing the modulation wave to the sawtooth carrier, the gate drive signals
u_{G}
_{1}
~
u_{G}
_{6}
are obtained for each power switch in all of the bridges. This is shown in
Fig. 2
.
III. RESONANCE MODE
In
Fig. 2
, when one phase current is negative while the other two are positive, the power switch V
_{A}
is working and resonance happens. Conversely, if one phase current is positive while the other two are negative, V
_{B}
is working. Since the respective phases’ currents are direct opposite, the ARCP circuit also has two operation modes, one of which is described in detail below.
Take section 1 as an example, when the three phase current directs as
i
_{S}
>0,
i
_{R}
>0, and
i
_{T}
<0, the power switches V
_{2}
and V
_{5}
in the T phase bridge are off, V
_{1}
and V
_{2}
in the R and S phases upper bridge are off, while V
_{4}
and V
_{6}
in the lower bridge and the auxiliary switch V
_{A}
are on.
Fig. 3
shows the waveforms of the ARCP circuit. In per cycle of the carrier, 9 modes can be separated by the main circuit switching manners, which are shown in
Fig. 4
. Since the frequency of the rectifier carrier is much higher than the grid frequency, the input current in per cycle can be considered constant, and is represented by the constant current source
i
_{s}
. Meanwhile, since the splitcapacitors
C
_{d1}
and
C
_{d2}
are large enough, their voltages are considered constant, and it represented by the voltage source
E
_{d}
/2.
Waveforms of the ARCP circuit.
Operating modes.
 A. Resonance Analysis
Mode a (
t
_{0}
~
t
_{1}
): At the stable state, power is provided to the load from the three phase source and series inductors
L
_{R}
,
L
_{S}
and
L
_{T}
. Each phase current flows through the flywheel diodes VD
_{2}
, VD
_{3}
and VD
_{5}
respectively.
Mode b (
t
_{1}
~
t
_{2}
): When V
_{A}
switches on at
t
_{2}
, the voltage on
L
_{r}
is
E
_{d}
/2, and the current
i
_{Lr}
increases gradually so that V
_{A}
is switched on under zero current. When
i
_{Lr}
=
i
_{DA1}
+
i
_{DA3}
≥
i
_{R}
+
i
_{T}
(=
i
_{S}
), diodes VD
_{1}
and VD
_{3}
are shut off at the zero current state.
Mode c (
t
_{2}
~
t
_{3}
): Resonance happens on both
L
_{r}
and the snubber capacitors of R and T phases. For R phase,
C
_{1}
is charging and
C
_{4}
discharging, while for T phase,
C
_{3}
is charging and
C
_{6}
discharging. During the weakening of the discharge,
i
_{Lr}
increases and then decreases until the discharging of
C
_{4}
and
C
_{6}
finish at a time when the phase voltage equals zero.
Mode d (
t
_{3}
~
t
_{4}
): At
t
=
t
_{3}
,
u
_{RN}
and
u
_{TN}
decrease to zero, and
i
_{Lr}
=
i
_{S}
. Therefore, V
_{4}
and V
_{6}
are switched on under zero voltage and zero current.
The voltage on the inductor is
E
_{d}
/2. Therefore, the power directs to source
E
_{d}
/2 and
i
_{Lr}
decreases. At the same time, as
i
_{V4}
and
i
_{V6}
increase, power is transmitted to the series inductors
L
_{R}
,
L
_{S}
and
L
_{T}
. As a result, the current meets with the relations below:
Since
i
_{S}
remains constant,
i
_{Lr}
=0 when 
i
_{S}
=
i
_{R}
+
i
_{T}
=
i
_{V4}
+
i
_{V6}
.
Mode e (
t
_{4}
~
t
_{5}
):
i
_{Lr}
continues to decrease until its direction is reversed. Since diode VD
_{A1}
and VD
_{A3}
are off in reverse, the current on
i
_{Lr}
remains zero. As a result, V
_{A}
is switched off under zero current.
Mode f (
t
_{5}
~
t
_{6}
): Since the voltage on capacitor
C
_{4}
is zero and is kept there, V
_{4}
can be switched off under zerovoltage. At this time
i
_{V4}
decreases to zero,
C
_{4}
starts charging and
C
_{1}
starts discharging.
Mode g (
t
_{6}
~
t
_{7}
): At
t
_{6}
,
u
_{RN}
increases to
E
_{d}
, and the voltage on
C
_{1}
is zero. At this time, power is transmitted to the load form the
R
and
S
phase sources and the series inductors
L
_{R}
and
L
_{S}
. As a result, diode VD
_{1}
is switched on by the forward voltage.
Mode h (
t
_{7}
~
t
_{8}
): Similar to mode f, V
_{6}
is switched off under zero voltage. Meanwhile,
i
_{V6}
decrease to zero,
C
_{6}
start charging and
C
_{3}
starts discharging.
Mode i (
t
_{8}
~
t
_{0}
): Similar to mode g, diode VD
_{3}
is switched on. At this time, operation returns to mode a.
 B. Mathematical Analysis of the Resonance
1) Mathematical Analysis for Mode b
: Due to the initial conditions
i
_{Lr}
(
t
_{1}
)=0 and
u
_{Lr}
=
E
_{d}
/2, the voltage complies with:
and it can be derived that:
at
t
=
t
_{2}
,
i
_{Lr}
(
t
_{2}
)=
i
_{S}
, i.e.
Thus:
2) Mathematical Analysis for Mode c:
Fig. 5
shows diagrams of a simple equivalent resonant circuit. Assume that each capacitor is
C
_{r}
, and that the initial conditions are
u
_{C4}
(
t
_{2}
)=
u
_{C6}
(
t
_{2}
)=
E
_{d}
, i.e.
U
_{C4}
(
S
)=
U
_{C6}
(
S
)=
E
_{d}
/S. Then the resonant current
i
_{r}
(
t
_{2}
)＝0. For
Fig. 5
d, the following equation can be satisfied:
The solution gives:
Where:
So that:
at
t
=
t
’, i.e. when
i
_{r}
comes to its maximum, and makes a derivative with both parts of Equation (10). Moreover, let the left part be:
，then: cos
ω
_{r}
(
t
_{1}

t
_{2}
)=0
It can be obtained that:
In
Fig. 5
a, the voltage on capacitors
C
_{4}
and
C
_{6}
are:
Substitute (8) into the above equation, then:
The solutions show that:
By substituting (11) into (14), it can be seen that the voltages on
C
_{4}
and
C
_{6}
comply with (15) when
i
_{r}
comes to its maximum:
When
C
_{4}
and
C
_{6}
discharge at
t
=
t
_{3}
, their voltages become zero. Therefore, let (14) equals zero, which results in:
Integrating (16) and (10), i.e. at
t
=
t
_{3}
, the resonant current
i
_{r}
follows:
It can be seen that, when
i
_{Lr}
reaches its maximum, the voltages on
C
_{4}
and
C
_{6}
decrease from
E
_{d}
to
E
_{d}
/2. This is due to the fact that when
u
_{C4}
(
u
_{C6}
)>
E
_{d}
/2, the voltage on
L
_{r}
is positive (
u
_{C4}

E
_{d}
/2>0). Therefore, as
i
_{Lr}
increases (for
i
_{Lr}
=
i
_{Lr}
(
t
_{2}
)+
i
_{r}
(
t

t
_{2}
)=
i
_{S}
+
i
_{r}
(
t

t
_{2}
)), power accumulates gradually on
L
_{r}
. Moreover, when
u
_{C4}
(
u
_{C6}
)=
E
_{d}
/2, the voltage added on
L
_{r}
becomes zero. Then
i
_{Lr}
stops increasing, i.e.
i
_{Lr}
comes to its maximum. As
C
_{4}
and
C
_{6}
discharge,
u
_{C4}
(
u
_{C6}
) start to decrease until
u
_{C4}
(
u
_{C6}
)<
E
_{d}
/2. Therefore, the voltage on
L
_{r}
turns to be negative. Then due to the converse
L
_{r}
d
i
_{Lr}
/dt,
i
_{Lr}
starts to decrease and release energy from
L
_{r}
, which equals the accumulated energy as mentioned above. Finally, at
t
=
t
_{3}
,
i
_{Lr}
=
i
_{Lr}
(
t
_{2}
)+
i
_{r}
(
t

t
_{2}
)=
i
_{S}
.
Diagrams of simple equivalent resonant circuit.
3) Working time of the auxiliary switch V_{A}:
For the sake of convenience,
Fig. 3
use a sawtooth carrier with a positive slope for a comparison of the voltages. The time when V
_{A}
is switched on or when resonance starts is determined by
u
_{A}
. As shown in
Fig. 3
, the time that V
_{A}
closes is ahead of the vertical edges of the sawtooth carrier, namely at
t
_{1}
. According to the above analyzes in 1) and 2), the advance time shall be (Δ
t
_{2}
+Δ
t
_{3}
).
Assume that the carrier period is
T
_{c}
, the reference voltage
u
_{A}
can then be derived from:
Or:
Substituting (7) and (16) into this yields:
Where:
From Equation (19), the time that V
_{A}
switches on should vary with changes in
i
_{S}
. In other words, it can follow the fluctuation of the load. However, the time when V
_{A}
switches off should be behind of the vertical edges of the sawtooth carrier, and its delay time should be longer than (
t
_{4}

t
_{3}
≈Δ
t
_{3}
).
A positive slope sawtooth carrier can also be used to get solutions for the reference voltages
u
_{A}
or
u
_{B}
in all of the sections shown in
Fig. 2
. Equation (19) is also adaptable to all of the sections except that the reference current
I
should be valued as bellow:

Section 1 and 4,I=iS

Section 2 and 5,I=iR

Section 3 and 6,I=iT
As above mentioned, when V
_{A}
works, the resonance makes the input voltage of the bridges periodically decrease to zero, which provides the ZVS condition for the switches in the lower bridges. On the other hand, when V
_{B}
works, the resonance will periodically increase the input voltage of the bridges to
E
_{d}
, which creates ZVS for the switches in the upper bridges.
4) Design of the Resonance Parameters:
The selection of resonance parameters considers not only achievement of zerovoltage softswitching, but also the resonance time, the current and voltage stress, and additional losses, etc.
From (10) and (11), the maximum value for
i
_{r}
can be deduced as follows:
Where, the resonance impedance
The resonant current
i
_{r}
affects the current stress, the onstate losses, and the turnoff losses of the auxiliary switches. Since the DC voltage
E
_{d}
is related to the modulation ratio
M
, according to (20), the adjustable parameter affecting the resonant current is
Z
_{r}
.
From the viewpoint of reducing loss, it is hoped that the resonant current is as small as possible, i.e.
Z
_{r}
is as large as possible. This can be achieved by increasing
C
_{r}
or by reducing
L
_{r}
. However, too much
Z
_{r}
can also cause problems.
The resonant capacitor
C
_{r}
should be optimized to ease the main switch turnoff loss in case it is too small
[18]
.
Since
L
_{r}
is related to the load current, too large a value for
L
_{r}
might cause a prolonged rise time for
i
_{r}
, and it might affect the normal resonance.
Therefore, the determination of
Z
_{r}
should meet with the resonance time at first, and consider the circuit loss
[19]
.
The maximum commutation time (Δ
t
_{2}
+Δ
t
_{3}
) should be smaller than the switching dead time
t
_{dead}
of traditional hardswitching inverters, i.e. Δ
t
_{2}
+Δ
t
_{3}
<
t
_{dead}
. According to Equations (7) and (16), (Δ
t
_{2}
+Δ
t
_{3}
) can be expressed as:
Where,
I
_{Smax}
is the maximum for
i
_{s}
.
The resonant frequency
ω
_{r}
should be set by optimizing the current stress, the onstate losses and the turnoff losses of the auxiliary switches.
With the load current
I
_{Smax}
, the resonance current
I
_{rmax}
, and the optimized resonant capacitor
C
_{r}
, the resonant inductance
L
_{r}
is decided.
IV. SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
 A. Control System
The control system shown in
Fig. 6
includes two parts:
Block diagram of control system.
One part aims at realizing power factor correction (PFC) and keeping the DCbus voltage constant. By measuring the line voltage
e
_{ST}
and phase current
i
_{R}
, the power factor angle
φ
can be obtained after phase discrimination. Then it is transformed as the angle offset Δ
α
, which is used in the PI regulator for phase control. By probing the DC bus voltage
E
_{d}
, the value is transformed into the modulation ratio offset Δ
M
, which is used in the PI regulator for voltage control. The two PI regulators are realized by the following software algorithm:
Based on the phase and amplitude control method, the threephase modulation waves can be derived from Equation (2).
The other part is to ensure that the ARCP circuit works in the softswitching state. By detecting the direction of the threephase current, the sawtooth carrier adopts a positive slope or a negative slope. Then it compares this with the modulation waves and the PWM drive signals can be produced. By measuring the amplitude of the phase current, the auxiliary switch drive signals can be obtained according to Equation (13).
 B. Current Feedback Control
Fig. 7
shows the phasor adjusting method for the rectifying mode, where the lag angle
θ
_{0}
is the angle between phasors
.
U
_{R}
is the virtual value of the fundamental component of phase R produced by PWM. It is deduced as:
The Phasor adjusting method for rectifying mode.
For improving the system dynamic response, the transition curve near the upright side of the triangle in
Fig. 8
should be shortened. In
Fig. 8
on the condition of ensuring a unity power factor and a constant DCbus voltage, when there is a sudden load increase, the converter cannot offer a sudden current immediately to series inductance in input side of the converter, at the time only capacitors can offer the sudden current, thus the output DC current of the system next steady state is expressed by
By following the energy balance between the AC side and the DC side of the converter, the following is obtained:
For
u
_{c}
is
E
_{d}
, with the right angle triangular diagram, (26) can be rewritten as:
Taking Δ
θ
_{0}
′ as small, (27) is linearized as:
where:
In a way similar to the Δ
θ
_{0}
′ derivation, according to the rightangled triangle relations between phasors, the following is obtained:
The change of the modulation is deduced as:
where,
k
_{2}
and
k
_{3}
are the proportion factor.
When the second portion in (30) is small and can be omitted, (30) approximates to:
From (28) and (31), it is known that the variable load current is detected indirectly by a change of the DC voltage. This feeds the control system for the next steady state as an additional control variable to generate Δ
θ
_{0}
′ and Δ
M
′. Therefore, the system control equation is:
Simulation waveforms.
 C. Simulation Verification
Accordingly the control system in
Fig. 6
, a simulation model based on Pspice software is built. The main parameters used in the simulation are as follows:

Input line voltage: 110V

DC voltage: 190V

Inductors:LR, S, T=7mH

Splitcapacitors:Cd1=Cd2=1100μF

Snubber capacitors:C1~6=8nF

Resonant inductor:Lr=14μH

Carrier frequency:fc=3.3kHz
Fig. 8
shows the simulation waveforms. In
Fig. 8
(a) the upper curve is the R phase voltage
e
_{R}
, and the lower curve is the
R
phase current
i
_{R}
. In
Fig. 8
(b), from top to bottom, the curves are the voltage
u
_{gA}
of the V
_{A}
driver signal, the voltage
u
_{c4}
of snubber
C
_{4}
, the current
i
_{Lr}
of the inductor
L
_{r}
, and the voltage
u
_{g4}
of the V
_{4}
driver signal.
In
Fig. 8
, the input phase
R
current keeps in phase with the source phase
R
voltage. In the process of the system power conversion, the main switch turns on under the ZVS condition, and the auxiliary switch conducts in the ZCS state. The simulation results conform to the theory discussed previously.
 D. Experimental Results
A 1kW prototype system is constructed for experimental verification. The system control is implemented on a platform consisting of a digital signal processor (DSP). The main parameters used in the experiment are as same as those used in the simulation.
The experimental results obtained from the prototype system are shown in
Fig. 9
.
Experimental waveforms.
Fig. 9
(a) shows in rectifying state, where the total input power factor (PF) of the phase current is 99.85% and the total harmonic distortion (THD) is 5.4%.
Fig. 9
(b)
9
(d) show the experimental waveforms for the resonance of the ZVS.
Fig. 9
(c) is a partially enlarged detail drawing of
Fig. 9
(b). As can be seen, when
u
_{c4}
is discharged to zero for resonance, the turningon of V
_{4}
is in the zero voltage state.
Because the voltage of the snubber capacitor cannot change immediately, the power switches always turn off in zero voltage.
If the turningon time of
G
_{v4}
is delayed 1μs, the voltage
u
_{c4}
will rise owing to the energy of the resonant inductor, and the turningon of V
_{4}
is not in the zero voltage state.
Fig. 10
shows the converter efficiency versus the output power. The efficiency of the softswitching rectifier improves by about 2.1% at 1.02kW when compared with the conventional SPWM hardswitching topology.
Efficiency Comparison.
V. CONCLUSIONS
An auxiliary resonant commutated pole topology for threephase PWM rectifiers is proposed. A detailed analysis and experiments are given based on its working principle, control strategy and resonant modes. Simulation and experiment results prove the consistency on a mathematical basis.
The proposed rectifier shows improvements on simpler structures when compared to the conventional ARCP while maintaining its efficiency. As a result, it is achieves costsavings in hardware due to its simplified main circuit topology. Nonetheless, the minimum peak current in resonating and the least switching PWM mode enhance its advantages of high efficiency and easy control.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Program for Shanghai PuJiang Program (Grant No. 12PJ1403900) and Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. 13ZZ132).
BIO
KeQing Qu was born in China, in 1970. He received his Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from Shanghai University, Shanghai, China, in 2004. He is currently an Associate Professor at the Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai, China. He is also a Master Instructor. As a Visiting Scholar, he studied in Germany with full funding by the National Foundation for Study, from 2009 to 2010. He holds three Chinese patents and one monograph. He has published more than 40 technical papers in journals and conference proceedings. His current research interests include power electronic conversion, and new energy generation and its application to power systems.
JinBin Zhao (M’06) was born in China, in 1972. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Oita University, Oita, Japan, in 2002 and 2005, respectively. He worked as a Researcher at the R&D Headquarters of the Origin Electric Co., Ltd, Japan, from 2005 to 2011. He is currently a Professor at the Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai, China. He currently holds three U.S. patents and ten Japanese patents. He has published 60 technical papers in journals and conference proceedings. His current research interests include the control of power converters, softswitching power converters, inverters, distributed power systems, powerfactor correction and electric drive systems. Dr. Zhao is a Member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEEJ), and the Institute of Electronics Information and Communication Engineers of Japan (IEICE). He is also a Senior Member of the China Power Supply Society.
View Fulltext
Sato S.
,
Suehiro Y.
,
Nagai S. I.
,
Morit K.
2000
“High efficiency softswitching 3phase PWM rectifier,”
in Proc. INTELEC
453 
460
Yoshitsugu J.
,
Inoue K.
,
Hiraki E.
,
Nakaoka M.
2001
“Resonant DC link snubberassisted soft switching inverter type AC servo driver with low common mode current characteristics,”
in Proc. IEEE Conf. Power Electron. Drive Syst.
494 
499
Ahmed T.
,
Nagai S.
,
Nakaoka M.
,
Tanaka T.
2007
“Utilityinteractive fourswitch threephase softswitching inverter with single resonant DClink snubber and boost chopper,”
Journal of Power Electronics
7
(2)
109 
117
Qu K. Q.
,
Sun C. B.
,
Chen G. C.
,
Xu C.Y.
,
Katsunori T.
2004
“A PAC based threephase zerovoltage softswitching PWM converter,”
inProc. IEEE the 4th IPEMC
3
1091 
1096
Rui L.
,
Xu D. H.
2014
“A ZeroVoltage Switching ThreePhase Inverter,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
29
(3)
1200 
1210
De Doncker R. W.
,
Lyons J. P.
1990
“The auxiliary resonant commutated pole converter,”
in IEEE IAS Conf. Rec.
1228 
1235
Chu E.
,
Wu M.
,
Huang L.
,
Hou X.
,
Zhang H.
2013
“Research on a novel modulation strategy for auxiliary resonant commutated pole inverter with the smallest loss in auxiliary commutation circuits,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
28
(3)
1103 
1117
Ma Z. Y.
,
Xu D. H.
,
Li R.
,
Du C. R.
,
Zhang X.
2012
“A novel dcside zerovoltage switching (ZVS) threephase boost PWM rectifier controlled by an improved SVM method,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
27
(11)
4391 
4408
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2184558
Zhang Q.
,
Hu H.
,
Zhang D.
,
Fang X.
,
Shen Z.
,
Bartarseh I.
2013
“A controlledType ZVS technique Without Auxiliary Components for the low power DC/AC inverter,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
28
(7)
3287 
3296
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2225075
Marvi M.
,
Ali F.
2012
“A fully ZVS critical conduction mode boost PFC." Power Electronics,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
27
(4)
1958 
1965
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2011.2171045
AguillonGarcia J.
,
Moon G.W.
2011
“A highefficiency threephase ZVS PWM converter utilizing a positive doublestar active rectifier stage for server power supply,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
58
(8)
3317 
3329
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2010.2090833
Corentin R.
,
JeanPaul F.
,
Le
,
Philippe M.
,
Philippe D.
,
Alain L.
2010
“A simplified resonant pole for threelevel softswitching PFC rectifier used in UPS,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
57
(8)
2739 
2746
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2009.2038392
Dong W.
,
Choi J. Y.
,
Lee F. C.
,
Boroyevich D.
,
Lai J.
2001
“Comprehensive evaluation of auxiliary resonant commutated pole inverter for electric vehicle applications,”
inProc. IEEE PESC
2
625 
630
Jang Y.
,
Jovanovic M. M.
2013
“The TAIPEI rectifiera new threephase twoswitch ZVS PFC DCM boost rectifier,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
28
(2)
686 
694
Amini M. R.
,
Farzanehfard H.
2011
“Threephase softswitching inverter with minimum components,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
58
(6)
2258 
2264
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2010.2064280
Nishimura K.
,
Hirachi K.
,
Eid A. M.
,
Lee H. W.
,
Nakaoka N.
2006
“A novel prototype discontinuous inductor current mode operated threephase PFC power converter with four active switches,”
in Proc. IEEE PESC
824 
830
Zhang Q.
,
Zhang D. H.
,
Hu H. B.
,
Shen J.
,
Batarseh I.
2013
“Controlledtype ZVS technique without auxiliary components for microinverters,”
Journal of Power Electronics
13
(6)
919 
927
DOI : 10.6113/JPE.2013.13.6.919
Steigerwald R. L.
,
De Doncker R. W.
,
Kheraluwala M.
1996
“A comparison of high power dc–dc soft switched converter topologies,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat.
32
(5)
1139 
1145
DOI : 10.1109/28.536876
Chu E. H.
,
Wu M. Y.
,
Huang L.
,
Hou X.
,
Zhang H. G.
2014
“Research on a novel modulation strategy for auxiliary resonant commutated pole inverter with the smallest loss in auxiliary commutation circuits,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
29
(3)
1103 
1117
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2261092