This paper proposes a novel control method for a multioutput switchedresonant converter. Output voltage can be regulated against variations in the supply voltage and load by controlling the voltage of the resonant capacitor (pulse amplitude control). Precise control is possible when pulse amplitude control is combined with pulse number control. The converter is analyzed, and design considerations are explained by using examples. Control implementation is described and load regulation and ripples are analyzed by simulation and hardware results. The topology is modified to obtain an additional negative output without any additional hardware other than a diode. The analysis of such a triple output converter with two positive outputs and one negative output is conducted and confirmed. The topology and control scheme are scalable to any number of outputs.
I. INTRODUCTION
Multipleoutput converters are a category of converters wherein many different output voltages are obtained from a single converter. However, some parts of the converters are common for all outputs. This setup minimizes the total hardware count. If a forward or fly back converter is used, the primary winding of the transformer is common, but separate secondary windings are used for each output. This common primary winding reduces the reactive component in the converter, thus minimizing size, weight, and cost. Nonisolated versions have several types of single inductor and multipleoutput converters (SIMO), wherein the source side inductor is common for all outputs.
Such multipleoutput converters are required in a wide variety of applications. For example, a typical personal computer requires several different power supplies for the motherboard, hard disk, CD drive, cooling fan, and so on. Choosing the correct supply voltage for a specific load enhances the performance and improves the efficiency of the device by minimizing losses.
The key issue regarding multipleoutput converters is the regulation of various outputs against varying supply voltages and loads with minimal hardware and minimal stress on the components. Any variation in the load of one output, apart from influencing its own output voltage, also influences the voltages of other outputs. This cross regulation is another important consideration.
Previous literature describes numerous possible configurations for multipleoutput converters, which can be broadly divided into isolated and nonisolated converters
[1]
–
[15]
. For nonisolated converters, many configurations of SIMO converters have been proposed. A new family of switchedresonant converters has been proposed in
[14]
,
[15]
. A resonant tank is repeatedly charged from the supply and is successively discharged into each output in a cyclic manner. Switches are turned OFF at zero current to minimize switching losses. Virtually no cross regulation exists between the outputs because of the discontinuous nature of the inductor current after the power discharge into each output. However, by the nature of this topology, power is transferred to the load in discrete units only, thus making the precise and continuous regulation of load voltage difficult.
In this study, a new control scheme is proposed to regulate the output voltage against load or supply variations. The voltage of the resonant capacitor is varied as needed to regulate the output voltage. This process can be performed in a continuous manner, thus enabling precise regulation. The modified topology has the additional advantage of obtaining an additional negative output without the need for an additional switch. Hence, any positive or negative output voltage can be obtained and tightly regulated. The converter is analyzed, and the simulation and hardware results confirm the concept and analysis.
This paper is organized as follows. Chapter 2 explains the principle of operation of the converter and different existing methods of control. Chapter 3 discusses the proposed control method and the steady state analysis. Chapter 4 explains the design considerations. The control implementation strategy is discussed in Chapter 5. Chapter 6 presents the simulation and hardware results for the chosen converter. Chapter 7 discusses a converter modification that can generate an additional negative output with only an extra diode. Chapter 8 concludes.
II. PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION
Before explaining the proposed control method, the existing topology is briefly described and the control mechanism by frequency and pulse number variations is examined in this chapter. The switching devices are assumed ideal.
Fig. 1
shows a dualoutput switchedresonant converter with switches S1, S2, and S3. The switches turn ON and OFF at zero current. D1, D2, and D3 prevent conduction in the opposite direction through the body diodes of the switches.
Dualoutput switchedresonant converter.
When S1 is initially OFF, the supply
Vs
,
Lr
, and
Cr
form an oscillatory circuit. A half cycle later, the current returns to zero and S1 is turned OFF at ZCS. The voltage across the capacitor is approximately twice the supply voltage. After a small dead time, S2 is turned ON and the stored energy in the capacitor discharges into the load through the oscillatory circuit
Cr
,
Lr
, S2, and load
R
1 (parallel with the filter capacitor
C
1). A quarter cycle later, the voltage across the resonant capacitor becomes V1 (the voltage of the first output) and inductor current is at negative maximum. When the capacitor voltage becomes zero, the diode Da becomes forward biased. The capacitor
Cr
is now bypassed and the inductor current discharges into the load linearly since the load voltage is almost constant. S2 is turned OFF at ZCS after the discharge is complete. The above cyclic process repeats for the second output with the charging of the resonant capacitor
Cr
and discharging into the second output
R
2 (parallel with the filter capacitor C2).
 A. Frequency (or dead time) Control
The energy stored in the capacitor at the end of the charging period is as follows:
where 2
V_{s}
corresponds to the voltage of the resonant capacitor at the end of the charging period. The energy transferred to the first output during a complete switching cycle of
T_{s}
seconds is given by (
V
_{1}
^{2}
T_{s}
/
R
1) , where
V_{1}
is the voltage of the first output and
R1
is the corresponding load resistance.
By equating the energies, we obtain the following:
which indicates that
C_{r}
is proportional to the required output power
V
_{1}
^{2}
/
R
1 and switching time
T_{s}
for a particular supply voltage. If the supply voltage
V_{s}
or load resistance
R1
changes,
V_{1}
can be maintained constant by controlling
T_{s}
via frequency control (or dead time control). However, in frequency control, if
R1
changes and
R2
does not change, a variation in
T_{s}
to maintain
V_{1}
constant will affect the other output voltage, thus leading to cross regulation. Hence, pure frequency control will not be suitable if more than one output exists.
 B. Pulse Number Control
For a converter with two outputs, given that
C_{r}
is common for both the outputs and
T_{s}
encompasses both outputs,
C_{r}
= (
V
_{1}
^{2}
.
T_{s}
) / (2
R
_{1}
V
_{s}
^{2}
) = (
V
_{2}
^{2}
.
T_{s}
) / (2
R
_{2}
V_{s}
^{2}
) , which implies that both outputs should have the same power. This constraint can be overcome by pulse number control, that is, a twooutput converter should have
n
1 power pulses for the first output and
n
2 power pulses for the second output within each switching cycle. The equation for the capacitor is modified as follows:

Cr= (V12Ts/ 2.R1.Vs2.n1) = (V22Ts/ 2.R2.Vs2.n2) ,
and the ratio of the output powers is the same as
n
1/
n
2. The times allocated for each output within a switching cycle are also in the same ratio. The values of
n
1 and
n
2 can be varied independently within the overall
T_{s}
, thus preventing cross regulation. For example, if a dualoutput converter has two outputs of 30 and 40 W, three and four power pulses will exist in the first and second outputs, respectively. The power of each pulse will be 10 W. The disadvantage of this method is that power and voltage can only be controlled in discrete values and intermittently. A supply of 8 and 15 pulses to the first and second outputs, respectively, may not be practical in every switching cycle at a power pulse of 5 W if the powers to the two outputs are 40 and 75 W. The proposed control method overcomes this problem by varying the voltage of the resonant capacitor. Hence, continuous variation in output is possible.
III. PROPOSED CONTROL METHOD
In Equation (1.1), (2
V_{s}
) corresponds to the voltage of the resonant capacitor (
V_{cr}
) at the end of the resonant charging period. The proposed method varies the voltage of the resonant capacitor, thus controlling the output voltage. By expressing (2) in a general form, we obtain the following:
Hence, for a particular T
_{s}
and load resistance
R
1, the resonant capacitor voltage can be controlled to regulate V
_{1}
. The modified topology that enables this variation is shown in
Fig. 2
. The diode D
_{a}
is replaced with a switch S0(typically a MOSFET because ZVS is possible during turning ON and OFF). When S1 and S0 are turned ON, the current through the resonant inductor
L_{r}
increases linearly. When S0 is opened, the stored energy in the inductor completely discharges into the resonant capacitor
Cr
. The voltage across the resonant capacitor at the end of this discharge depends on the initial ‘ON’ duration of switches S1 and S0. Hence, by controlling this duration, the voltages of the resonant capacitor and the output can be continuously controlled.
Proposed converter with control of resonant capacitor voltage.
The different modes of operation and the steady state analysis are described below.
Fig. 3
shows the waveforms of the gate voltages, inductor current
I(Lr)
, and resonant capacitor voltage (
Vcr
).
Fig. 4
shows the circuit during each operating mode.
Waveforms of the proposed converter.
Circuit diagram for different modes.
Mode 1
: All switches are initially in OFF states. At
t
= 0, S0 and S1 are turned ON. S0 is turned ON with both ZVS and ZCS, and S1 is turned ON with ZCS. The supply voltage
V_{s}
appears across the resonant inductor
Lr
, and the inductor current rises linearly. At
t
=
t
_{a}
, the current becomes the following:
Mode 2
: At
t
=
t
_{a}
, S0 is switched OFF with ZVS. The parasitic capacitance of the switch is included in
Cr
. The voltage across Cr starts to rise. By considering this instant as t = 0 for this mode, we obtain the following:
The initial current is
i
(t = 0) =
I_{1}
. By solving the above equation, we obtain the following:
i
(t) can be rewritten as follows:
where
By substituting
I
_{1}
from Eq.(4), we obtain the following:
or
ωt_{a}
= tan
α
.
The voltage across the capacitor can be written as follows:
From Eq. (10), the following expression is obtained:
For zero current switching, the current should be allowed to reach zero. From Eq. (10), the current becomes zero at
ωt
=
π

α
. The corresponding capacitor voltage becomes the following:
Given that
ωt_{a}
= tan
α
,
The variations in gain,
V_{cr0}
/
V_{s}
, and
ωt
= tan
α
with “
t
” is shown in
Fig. 5
. If the inductor is not initially charged,
I_{1}
= 0 and Mode 1 does not exist;
t
_{a}
= 0, α = 0, and
V
_{cr0}
= 2
V_{s}
. If the inductor is initially charged for a duration of
t
_{1}
such that α = tan
^{−1}
(
ωt_{1}
) = π/3, the voltage across the capacitor becomes 3V
_{s}
; that is, the capacitor voltage varies from 2
V_{s}
to 3
V_{s}
as α varies from zero to π/3.
Variation of gain and tanα with time.
Hence, the control action consists of varying
t
_{a}
in Mode 1 such that the capacitor voltage is adjusted to the correct value corresponding to the load.
In Eq. (3), substituting
V_{cr}
=
V_{s}
(1+1/
Cosα
) , the first output voltage becomes the following:
For different
V_{s}
and
R1
,
α_{1}
is regulated to maintain
V_{1}
.
A similar equation is obtained for the second output:
α_{2}
is regulated to maintain
V_{2}
.
Given that
α_{1}
and
α_{2}
are independently controllable variables, no cross regulation occurs.
To constrain the maximum voltage and stresses across the capacitor and devices,
α
is limited to 45° or 60°. This control can be used together with the pulse number control for fine adjustment. For example, if the powers of the two outputs are 40 and 100 W, the first and second outputs will have one power pulse and two power pulses in every cycle, respectively. The power pulse of the first output is 40 W, which corresponds to
α
_{1}
= 0, and the power pulse of the second output is 50 W with
α
adjusted suitably. From Eqs. (16) and (17), the corresponding
α
is 36°.
Mode 3
: A small dead time, wherein no changes occur in current or voltage, is allowed for the devices to turn OFF completely.
Mode 4
: After a small dead time, switch S2, which corresponds to the first output, is turned ON and the stored energy in capacitor
C_{r}
is transferred to the load. The inductor current varies in a sinusoidal manner:
where the negative sign indicates that the current is in the opposite direction, and
t
= 0 corresponds to the beginning of this mode. The corresponding voltage across the capacitor is
After a quarter cycle, at
t
=
t
_{3}
and
ωt_{3}
= π/2 (
Fig. 12
b), the following is obtained:
and
V_{cr}
=
V
1.
Depending on the load,
V_{cr}
= 0 at
t
=
t_{4}
. The corresponding inductor current at
t
=
t
_{4}
can be obtained from Eqs. (18) and (22) as follows:
Mode 5
: At
t
_{4}
, the voltage across the capacitor is zero and attempts to become negative. This is prevented by body diode of S0, which is now forward biased. The inductor current now discharges linearly, and the duration from (19) is given by :
Given that the inductor current at the end of Mode 5 at
t
=
t
_{5}
is zero,
dI
= the value of
I_{Lr}
at
t
_{4}
. Hence, we obtain the following from Eq.(21):
The mode ends after the linear discharge when the current becomes zero at
t
_{5}
. After a small dead time, Modes 6 to 10 are implemented as a repeat of Modes 1 to 5 and feed power to the second output. The switching cycle is completed at the end of Mode 10.
IV. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
By choosing the resonant halfcycle duration
t
_{1}
based on device considerations and given that
ωt
_{1}
= π,
ω
can be found. The dead times in Mode 3 and at the end of Mode 5 are allowed to be 10% of the charging time
t
1. Let D be the duty ratio. Depending on the power levels of the two outputs, we decide on the power to be transferred in each output pulse. For example, if the power levels are 15 and 25 W, each output power pulse could be 10 W, corresponding to
α
= 0. The first and second outputs have one power pulse and two power pulses, respectively. “
α
” should be adjusted for the two outputs such that 10 and 20 W becomes 15 and 25 W, respectively. When
α
= 0° and
V_{cr0}
= 2
V_{s}
for a single output converter and given that
t
_{1}
=π/ω , the total time duration from Modes 1 to 5 including the dead times is :
By knowing
ω
,
T_{s}
can be obtained. From Eq. (2), we obtain the following:
For a particular supply voltage,
C_{r}
is proportional to the required output power
V
1
^{2}
/
R
1 and the switching time
T_{s}
. By knowing
T_{s}
,
C_{r}
can be obtained. By knowing
ω
and
C_{r}
,
L_{r}
can be obtained as follows:
For a dualoutput converter, if
T_{s}
is divided equally between the two outputs, the righthand side of Eq. (25) becomes
ωDT_{s}
/2.
T_{s}
is in general, divided between the outputs at the same ratio as their powers.
The filter capacitor values are chosen based on ripple considerations. If each output is allocated at 50% of time T
_{s}
, the following is obtained:
where p is the percentage of permitted ripple. The design considerations are explained by using the example shown below. The specifications of the chosen converter are shown in
Table I
.
CONVERTER SPECIFICATIONS
The powers of the first and second outputs are less than 1 W and more than 1 W, respectively. By assuming a basic power pulse of 0.75 W for α = 0, the additional power for the two outputs can be obtained by varying α.
The resonant halfcycle time t1 is chosen as 10 μs.
ωt
_{1}
= π, from which, ω = 0.3142*10
^{6}
rad/sec.
By using the second output as reference and the right side of Eq. (1.25) as
ωDT_{s}
/2 for the dualoutput case, we can obtain the following:
T_{s}
is obtained as 150 μs. From Eq.(26),
C_{r}
is obtained as 0.1 μF. From Eq.(27), the corresponding
L_{r}
is obtained as 101 μH.
V. CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION
The schematic for the control of the converter is shown in
Fig. 6
, and the corresponding power circuit is shown in
Fig. 7
. Vg0, Vg1, Vg2, and Vg3 correspond to the gate signals of MOSFETs S0, S1, S2, and S3, respectively, and Vf1 and Vf2 are the feedback signals from the outputs.
Schematic of the controller.
Power circuit of the converter in Fig. 6.
The output voltage is continuously controlled by varying the resonant capacitor voltage. This resonant capacitor voltage is then controlled by the peak value of the inductor current in Mode 1 when S0 and S1 are ON. The setpoint of the required output is compared with the actual output and the error is passed through a PI controller and a limiter block. The output of this limiter block corresponds to the required value of the inductor currrent. Given that the current in the inductor charges linearly during Mode 1, “time” can be used as the controlling parameter instead of current, thereby making current sensing unnecessary. Similar to the “peak current mode control,” a running clock generator sets a flipflop periodically at the beginning of each clock cycle. The frequency of the clock generator corresponds to the required switching frequency of the converter. The output of the flipflop drives the gate of S0. A time ramp is generated from the instant of the positive edge of the clock. When the output of the time ramp exceeds the output of the limiter block, the flipflop is reset and S0 is turned OFF. Given that the same exercise has to be repeated for the second output, the outputs of the corresponding flipflops are “OR”ed and given to the gate of S0. S1 is turned ON twice per cycle and once for each output to charge the resonant capacitor. S2 and S3 are turned ON once per cycle to discharge the energy from the resonant capacitor to the outputs. The ON durations of S1, S2, and S3 depend on the design parameters to ensure discontinuous conduction. A stabilizing ramp can be added if required.
VI. SIMULATION AND HARDWARE RESULTS
The simulation results for the converter with the specifications shown in
Table I
are discussed below. The output voltages, resonant inductor current, and resonant capacitor voltage at the specified supply of 24 V and load resistances of 150 and 22 Ω are shown in
Fig. 8
a. The corresponding waveforms when the supply voltage is changed to 15 V with the same load resistances is shown in
Fig. 8
b. Given the reduced supply voltage, the duration of initial charging in Mode 1 increases to supply the required energy. The waveforms for a supply of 24 V and the load resistances of the two outputs changed to 180 and 15 Ω are shown in
Fig. 8
c. The reduced power requirement of Output 1 and the increased power requirement of Output 2 are reflected in the current and voltage waveforms. In all cases, the output voltages are tightly regulated.
To achieve load regulation, the load resistance of the first output is changed from 30 Ω to 180 Ω in increments of 30 Ω. The corresponding output voltages and output currents are shown in
Fig. 9
(a).
Table II
shows the average, maximum, and minimum voltages for each load.
VARIATION OF FIRST OUTPUT VOLTAGE WITH LOAD
VARIATION OF FIRST OUTPUT VOLTAGE WITH LOAD
The load resistance of the second output is similarly changed from 10 Ω to 30 Ω in increments of 5 Ω. The corresponding output voltages and output currents are shown in
Fig. 9
(b).
Table III
shows the average, maximum, and minimum voltages for each load. The load voltages are tightly regulated for such a wide variation.
The ripple in the output (
Tables II
and
III
) is observed to be 2% or less.
(a) Output voltages, inductor current, and capacitor voltage (Vs = 24 V, R1 = 150 Ω, and R2 = 22 Ω). (b) Output voltages, inductor current, and capacitor voltage (Vs = 15 V, R1 = 150 Ω, and R2 = 22 Ω). (c) Output voltages, inductor current, and capacitor voltage (Vs = 24 V, R1 = 180 Ω, and R2 = 15 Ω).
(a) First output voltage and current (load varies from 30 Ω to 180 Ω in increments of 30 Ω). (b) Second output voltage and current (load varies from 10 Ω to 30 Ω in increments of 5 Ω).
VARIATION OF SECOND OUTPUT VOLTAGE WITH LOAD
VARIATION OF SECOND OUTPUT VOLTAGE WITH LOAD
(a) Output voltages and current (Load 1 changes from 120 Ω → 60 Ω → 120 Ω). (b) Output voltages and current (Load 2 changes from 20 Ω → 10 Ω → 20 Ω).
The effect of sudden load variation and the corresponding transients are illustrated in
Figs. 10
a and
10
b.
Fig. 10
a shows the effect of a sudden change in the first output load from 120 Ω to 60 Ω and then back to 120 Ω.
Fig. 10
b shows the effect of a sudden change in the second output load from 20 Ω to 10 Ω and then back to 20 Ω again. In both cases, the transient variation in the output during the load change is minimal. Furthermore, cross regulation is virtually negligible because the other output is completely unaffected.
Control range:
Control of the output voltage is only possible when α > 0°. If either load resistance or supply voltage is high, the output may exceed the set value even at α = 0° and control is lost. If either supply voltage or load resistance is low, the charge and discharge times of the resonant inductor will increase and the current may not reach zero before the beginning of the next cycle. Hence, the design must consider the worstcase values of the load and supply voltage.
Hardware results:
The hardware implementation is performed by using a Xilinx Spartan 3 FPGA kit operating at 20 MHz with a XC3S250E FPGA processor. The specifications for the hardware model are same as the specifications in
Table I
. One pulse is present in Outputs 1 and 2 per cycle. IRF 840 is the switching device, and BYQ28E is the blocking diode. A 20 MHz clock frequency corresponds to a clock time of 50 ns. The total time is 3000 clocks.
The inductor current, resonant capacitor voltage, and output voltage waveforms are shown in
Figs. 11
a to
11
c. The waveforms show that the level of resonant capacitor voltage and the peak charging current differ for each of the two outputs while satisfying the output requirements.
(a) Inductor current and resonant capacitor voltage. (b) Resonant capacitor voltage. (c) First and second output voltages.
Given the ZCS operation of the switches, switching losses are largely minimized. However, efficiency is around 70% to 75% because of the presence of the reverse blocking diodes and because the converter has low power and voltage. If switches without body diodes are used, the reverse blocking diodes are not required and efficiency improves to 80% to 85%.
VII. OBTAINING AN ADDITIONAL NEGATIVE OUTPUT
The topology discussed above can be easily adapted to obtain an additional negative output without any additional switches. Only a decoupling diode is required additionally. A triple output converter with two positive outputs and an additional negative output is shown in
Fig. 12
a. The corresponding waveforms of the inductor current and the resonant capacitor voltage are shown in
Fig. 12
b. The additional modes of operation for the third negative output are shown in
Figs. 12
c and
12
d.
(a) Converter with an additional negative output. (b) Inductor current and capacitor voltage waveforms. (c) Mode 11. (d) Mode 12.
Output voltages
V1
and
V2
are obtained in the manner mentioned above. The third output
V3
with a negative polarity works like a buckboost converter in discontinuous conduction mode. When S0 and S1 are ON, the resonant inductor
Lr
is charged linearly because the voltage across the inductor is the supply voltage
Vs
. When S1 is turned OFF, the stored energy in the inductor is transferred to the third output through diode D4. The current decreases linearly because the voltage across the inductor is the third output voltage (which is negative).
The output voltage of this negative third output can be regulated by controlling the ON duration of S0 and S1 to charge the inductor
Lr
. A MOSFET is used as switch S0 since it has zero voltage switching both during ON and OFF switching. However, for the negative output, S1 does not have zero current switching when switched OFF. During power transfer in the linear discharge mode for the positive outputs, the body diode of S0 carries the current and performs the function of diode Da in
Fig. 1
.
The analysis of this converter shows that two additional modes exist for the negative output in addition to the ten modes of operation discussed for the positive outputs above. These two modes can be present anywhere in the switching cycle. In this study, these two modes are present at the end of the cycle.
Mode 11:
Once S0 and S1 are turned ON, the resonant inductor
Lr
is charged linearly because the voltage across the inductor is the supply voltage Vs. The rate of increase in the current is given by the following:
At
t
=
t_{b}
, the current reaches the following value:
Mode 12
: S1 is turned OFF and the stored energy in the inductor is transferred to the third output through diode D4. The current decreases linearly because the voltage across the inductor is the third output voltage (which is negative). The rate of decrease in the current is given by the following:
By substituting I
_{p}
for dI
_{Lr}
, the time required for the current to become zero is expressed as follows:
The output voltage of this negative third output can be regulated by controlling the ON duration of S0 and S1 in Mode 11 to charge the inductor
Lr
(i.e.,
t_{b}
). Given that the outputs are time multiplexed and the inductor is fully discharged into each output during its cycle, no cross regulation occurs.
The energy stored in the inductor at
t
=
t_{b}
in Mode 11 is completely transferred to the filter capacitor of the third output in Mode 12. The filter capacitor supplies power to the load at other times. By considering energy balance, the following is obtained:
By substituting for
I_{p}
from Eq. (31), we obtain the following:
Given that
Lr
and
T_{s}
are fixed because of other positive outputs,
t_{b}
can be adjusted for each change in Vs and / or R3 to maintain V3 at the required value.
t_{b}
can be obtained as follows:
Hence, the resonant inductor is charged for a duration of
t_{b}
seconds in Mode 11 in every switching cycle, and this power is discharged into the third output for a duration of
t_{c}
seconds in Mode 12 (
Fig. 8
(b)).
The specifications for hardware validation are shown in
Table 4
. A full switching cycle consists of a charge/discharge sequence for each of the positive outputs and an inductor charge/discharge sequence for the third negative output.
CONVERTER SPECIFICATIONS
However, to achieve the required power for the third output, a single inductor charge/discharge sequence for the third negative output results in an inductor current that is greater than the corresponding positive output. Hence, to limit the peak value of the inductor current, the charge/discharge sequence for the third output is done twice per cycle.
The resonant inductor current and output voltage waveforms are shown in
Fig. 13
. The hardware setup is shown in
Fig. 14
.
Resonant inductor current and output voltages.
Hardware setup.
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
This study proposes a novel control scheme for a switchedresonant converter that is capable of achieving and regulating any combination of output voltages (both positive and negative). An additional negative output is achieved with the addition of only one diode. The topology is scalable to any number of outputs by adding a switch to each additional output. Steady state analysis is performed for the proposed converter, and the design considerations are explained. The simulation results and hardware implementation are validated by using an FPGA system.
BIO
K. Sundararaman obtained his MS degree from the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India, in 1987. He worked at L&T Ltd. and Siemens Ltd. until 2003. He is currently working as an Associate Professor in Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Chennai, India. His research interests are dc.dc converters and multilevel inverters.
M. Gopalakrishnan received his M. Tech in Electrical Power Systems from JNTU, Hyderabad, India, and his PhD from Anna University. He is a member of the Institute of Engineers. After 15 years of technical service in the IAF, he worked as a teacher for about 25 years. His research interests are highvoltage engineering, power systems, and power electronics.
Ki W. H.
,
Ma D.
2001
“Singleinductor multipleoutput switching converters,”
in Proc. of IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference
226 
231
Ma D.
,
Ki W. H.
,
Mok P. K. T.
,
Tsui C. Y.
2001
“Singleinductor multipleoutput switching converters with bipolar outputs,”
in Proc. IEEE International symposium on Circuits and Systems
301 
304
Ma D.
,
Ki W. H.
,
Tsui C. Y.
,
Mok P. K. T.
2003
“Singleinductor multipleoutput switching converters with time multiplexing control in discontinuous conduction mode,”
IEEE J. SolidState Circuits
38
(1)
89 
100
DOI : 10.1109/JSSC.2002.806279
Ma D.
,
Ki W. H.
,
Tsui C. Y.
2003
“A pseudoCCM/DCM SIMO switching converter with freewheel switching,”
IEEE J. SolidState Circuits
38
(6)
1007 
1014
DOI : 10.1109/JSSC.2003.811976
Koon S. C.
,
Lam Y. H.
,
Ki W. H.
2005
“Integrated chargecontrol singleinductor dualoutput stepup/stepdown converter,”
in Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems
3071 
3074
Le H. P.
,
Chae C. S.
,
Lee K. C.
,
Wang S. W.
2007
“A singleinductor switching dcdc converter with five outputs and ordered power distributive control,”
IEEE J. SolidState Circuits
42
(12)
2706 
2714
DOI : 10.1109/JSSC.2007.908767
Seol K. S.
,
Woo Y. J.
,
Cho G. H.
,
Gho G. H.
2009
“A synchronous multi output stepup / down dcdc converter with return current control,”
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs
56
(3)
210 
214
DOI : 10.1109/TCSII.2009.2015372
Patra P.
,
Patra A.
,
Misra N.
2012
“A singleinductor multipleoutput switcher with simultaneous buck, boost and inverted outputs,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
27
(4)
1936 
1951
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2011.2169813
Sharma A.
,
Pavan Y. S.
2006
“A single inductor multiple output converter with adaptive delta current mode control,”
in Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems
5643 
5646
Trevisan D.
,
Mattavelli P.
,
Tenti P.
2008
“Digital control of singleinductor multipleoutput stepdown dcdc converters in CCM,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
55
(9)
3476 
3483
DOI : 10.1109/TIE.2008.921234
Pizzutelli A.
,
Ghioni M.
2008
“Novel control technique for single inductor multiple output converters operating in CCM with reduced cross regulation,”
in Proc. of 23rd Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conf and Expo
1502 
1507
Huang M. H.
,
Chen K. H.
2009
“Singleinductor multioutput (SIMO) dcdc converters with high light load efficiency and minimized crossregulation for portable devices,”
IEEE J. SolidState Circuits
44
(4)
1099 
1111
DOI : 10.1109/JSSC.2009.2014726
Xu W.
,
Li Y.
,
Gong X.
,
Hong Z.
2010
“A dualmode singleinductor dualoutput switching converter with small ripple,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
25
(3)
614 
623
DOI : 10.1109/TPEL.2009.2033927
Jabbari M.
,
Farzanehfard H.
2009
“Family of softswitching resonant dcdc converters,”
IET Power Electronics
2
(2)
113 
124
DOI : 10.1049/ietpel:20080027
Shahalami S. H.
,
Momtazpour M. H.
2011
“Simulation and Implementation of a new topology in multioutput dcdc resonant converters based on SwRC converters,”
in Proc. of 2nd Power Electronics, Drive Systems and Technologies conference
75 
80