Advanced
Ghost Imaging with Different Speckle Sizes of Thermal Light
Ghost Imaging with Different Speckle Sizes of Thermal Light
Journal of the Optical Society of Korea. 2016. Feb, 20(1): 8-12
Copyright © 2016, Optical Society of Korea
  • Received : September 09, 2015
  • Accepted : December 12, 2015
  • Published : February 25, 2016
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Share
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Wang Jue
Yu Renlong
Xin Yu
yxin@njust.edu.cn
Shao Yanming
Chen Yanru
Zhao Qi
Abstract
In this paper, we theoretically and experimentally analyze the impact of speckle size of pseudo-thermal light source on ghost imaging. A larger size of speckle can bring improvements in SNR and visibility. At the same time, the edge blur of the retrieved image will become more serious. We also present a setup which can mitigate the edge blur of larger speckle while maintaining the advantages of higher SNR and visibility by changing the speckle size of the object beam with a concave lens.
Keywords
I. INTRODUCTION
In the past decade, ghost imaging (GI) has attracted a lot of attention. In ghost imaging, the object image is retrieved by using two spatially correlated beams: the reference beam and the object beam. The reference beam never interacts with the object and is measured with a pixelated detector. The object beam interrogates the object and then illuminates a bucket detector, with no spatial resolution. By correlating the reference beam with the bucket signal, the ‘ghost’ image is retrieved. In 1995, the first GI was found in quantum optics [1] , and it was once considered as a unique phenomenon of quantum optics. However, in 2002, Bennink achieved ghost imaging with scanning of a pair of collimated laser beams [2] , which sparked a debate [3 - 5] of whether GI was a quantum effect or not. Then a variety of thermal light sources [3 - 8] were used to realize GI. Recently some teams focused on the application of GI, such as GI by measuring reflected photons [9] , compressive GI [10 - 12] , GI through turbulent atmosphere [13] , GI in turbid media [14] . However, only a few teams [7 , 15 , 16] focused on the impact of the speckle size on GI. In this paper, we theoretically and experimentally analyze the pros and cons of GI with different speckle sizes, and try to present a setup which can at the same time make the best use of the advantages and bypass the disadvantages caused by different sizes of speckles.
II. METHODS & RESULTS
In order to get speckles with different sizes, we used the setup in [17] (see Fig. 1(a) ). The laser and rotating ground glass constituted a pseudo-thermal light source. The ground glass was in the focal plane of the Lens F while D was an aperture. With the formula δx 0 = πλf / ω 0 , we can get desired speckle size δx 0 by changing f of Lens. Here, λ is the wavelength of light and ω 0 represents the waist radius. The role of beam splitter is to form two spatially correlated beams. Beam 1 (the object beam) is collected with a bucket detector after illuminating the object. Beam 2 (the reference beam) never interacts with the object and measured with a pixelated detector. The distance between Aperture D and the two detectors are z 1 and z 2 respectively. Let us indicate with I 1 ( x 1 ) and I 2 ( x 2 ), the intensity distributions of the speckle fields on the object and reference planes, respectively. If T ( x ) indicates the transmission function, the bucket signal S 1 is
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Experimental setups for ghost imaging. (a) the traditional setup for ghost imaging. (b) the improved setup for ghost imaging.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
According to the result of [7] , we have the following formula
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Where < > indicates the average over independent speckle configurations. µ Δz ( x 1 , x 2 ) is the cross-correlation coefficient of the electric fields at the planes z 1 and z 2 . Acoh is the area of the speckle, which is related to the speckle size by
PPT Slide
Lager Image
. ⊗ denotes convolution, Nobj = Aobj / Acoh denotes the number of the speckles falling into the object. Eq. (2) shows that the visibility of GI [i.e., the maximum value of v Δz ( x 2 )] is equal to 1/ Nobj and, except for convolution effects (occurring when γ Δz ( x 2 , x 1 ) and T(x 2 , x 1 ) have similar widths), is independent of Δ z . Another indicator to evaluate the GI is SNR [15 , 16]
PPT Slide
Lager Image
While Nspeckle = Abeam / Acoh is the number of the speckles in the beam, Δ T min is the minimum variation of the object transmission function to be detected.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
is the average quadratic transmission function of the object. R represents the independent sampling number. With Eqs. (2) and (4), we know that for the case of using the same average number, a larger speckle size will lead to higher visibility and SNR. However, in experiments we found that a larger speckle size will get a more blurred edge of the object as well. We call this phenomenon edge blur of GI. We will theoretically analyze the reason of this phenomenon and experimentally show the edge blur of GI in the following.
Considering the case shown in Fig. 2 , there is a point x 2 where the transmission function is T ( x 2 ) = 0, and the distance from the edge is d . δx 1 and δx 2 are the sizes of two different speckles where δx 1 < δx 2 . The shaded areas indicate that the region can be received by the bucket detector. When δx 0 = D , the mutual coherence function [18] is
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The schematic view of the point x2 where the transmission function is T(x2) = 0.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Where I 0 is a real function representing the mean transverse intensity distribution at the source plane, varying on the large scale D the source diameter. C 0 is a real function with the property C 0 (0) = 1, which dies out over the small scale δx 0 (the speckle transverse size). In the deep-Fresnel zone,the coherence factor characterizing the granular structure of the source has a Gaussian profile of the form
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Here, we only consider the case z 1 = z 2 . Then, we obtain the complex coherence factor and its squared modulus reads as:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Eq. (7) illustrates that in the case where z 1 = z 2 , │ μ 2 is a Gaussian function described by the size δx 0 . The graph of │ μ 2 and │ x 1 x 2 │ is shown in Fig. 3 . We can see that for the same │ x 1 x 2 │, a larger speckle leads to a bigger │ μ 2 .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The graph of │μ2 vs │x1x2│.
The correlation between S 1 and I 2 ( x 2 ) is
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Assuming that the bucket detector is pixelated, so we obtain discrete result
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Where N denotes the number of the pixels in the shaded areas in Fig. 2 . From Fig. 3 we can see that
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Combining Eqs. (10) and (11), we have the result
PPT Slide
Lager Image
On the other hand, from Fig. 2 , the number of pixels has the relation that N δx1 < N δx2 , so we obtain the final result
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Eq. (13) shows two key features of GI with a pseudothermal light source: Firstly, because of the Gaussian distribution of the correlation radius of the speckle, I 2 ( x 2 ) and bucket signal S 1 are still related and the retrieved T ( x 2 ) > 0, although the ideal T ( x 2 ) = 0. Theoretically, when d > δx 0 / 2, the transmission function T ( x 2 ) = 0, and we call this distance δx 0 / 2 as the width of edge blur. Secondly, while Eqs. (2) and (4) illustrate that the ghost imaging will have a higher visibility and SNR with lager speckle, Eq. (13) shows that it will bring a more serious edge blur as well.
In order to experimentally demonstrate the edge blur, we implement the experiment shown in Fig. 1(a) . The source is a He-Na laser ( λ = 632.8 nm , ω 0 = 2 mm ). By selecting different lenses ( f = 50 mm and f = 100 mm , respectively), we obtain two kinds of speckle with δx 1 = 49.7 µm and δx 2 = 99.4 µm . The object was an aperture whose diameter is 900 µm . The experimental result is shown in Fig. 4 . Where Panel a1 shows the 2D-ghost image retrieved by averaging R=12800 independent realizations of the speckle field ( δx 1 ≈ 50 µm ). Panel b1 shows the horizontal profile of the aperture (blue continuous line), this profile compares with the expected one (dotted line) and its visibility is 0.0039. Panel a2 shows the 2D-ghost image retrieved by averaging R = 12800 independent realizations of the speckle field ( δx 2 ≈ 100 µm ). Panel b2 shows the horizontal profile of the aperture (blue continuous line), this profile compares with the expected one (dotted line) and its visibility is 0.0156.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The ghost imaging reconstruction of an aperture whose diameter is 900 µm. (a1) and (b1) are the reconstruction images which obtain 12800 realizations, when the speckle size of the thermal source is 50 µm. (a2) and (b2) are the reconstruction image which obtain 12800 realizations, when the speckle size of the thermal source is 100 µm.
Comparing the results with different speckles, we have the following conclusions: Firstly, compared with Fig. 4(a1) , the retrieved image with larger speckle (see Fig. 4(a2) ) has a higher SNR. Secondly, compared with Fig. 4(b1) , the retrieved image with lager speckle (see Fig. 4(b2) ) has a higher visibility, which is about four times of the visibility retrieved with smaller speckle. Thirdly, compared with Fig. 4(b1) , Fig. 4(b2) has a wider rising edge. This shows that the larger speckle used, the more serious edge blur exists.
Based on the analysis above, we try to present a setup ( Fig. 1(b) ) which can eliminate the adverse effects of speckle size. In Fig. 1(b) , the reference beam remains intact, and an optical modulator M is added to the object beam. The M is used to modulate the distribution of the light, and it can be a spatial light modulator (SLM) or lens, simply. Then the bucket signal can be rewritten as
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Where I 1 '( x 1 ) = mI 1 ( nx 1 ) represents the modulated light field, m and n are the modulation coefficients. By converting the variable, we have the following result
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The difference between Eq. (1) and Eq. (15) is the transmission function T '( x ), which indicates that the modulation of the light is equivalent to the modulation of the object. When n > 1, the effect is to narrow the object. When n < 1, the effect is to amplify the object. So we have the following formula
PPT Slide
Lager Image
This setup has at least three advantages: Firstly, we can arbitrarily zoom the object by setting different n . This feature allows us to image an object whose size is lager than the size of the detector. Secondly, according to Eq. (17), when n >, 1 / N'obj > Nobj which illustrates that the improved setup has a higher visibility than the traditional setup. Thirdly, because the reference beam remains intact, the width of the edge blur remains δx 0 / 2.
Two independent experiments were implemented with the setups shown in Figs. 1(a) and (b) , respectively. The two objects have the same size (slit, 1 mm × 3 mm ). In Fig. 1(b) , we used a concave lens as the modulator M and n = 2.12. The results are shown in Fig. 5 . Panels a1 and b1 are results of the traditional ghost imaging while Panels a2 and b2 represent results of the improved method. The visibility of results in Panels a1 and b1 is about 0.0026, and the visibility of results in Panel a2 and b2 is about 0.012. We can see the improved ghost imaging has higher SNR and visibility (about 4.5 times) than the traditional ghost imaging by comparing the results. The improvement of visibility is due to the change of modulation coefficient n. Moreover, Panels b1 and b2 show that the two retrieved image have the same width of edge blur. However, there is a price to pay, which is the retrieved image is a narrowed object. The experimental results are in good agreement with the theoretical analysis results.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The ghost imaging reconstruction of a 1 mm × 3 mm slit. (a1) and (b1) are the reconstruction image of the traditional setup, obtained with 16000 realizations. (a2) and (b2) are the reconstruction image of the improved setup, obtained with 16000 realizations.
III. CONCLUSION
In this paper, the impact of speckle size of pseudo-thermal light source on ghost imaging is theoretically and experimentally analyzed. For the same number of independent realizations, the larger speckle size of thermal source is, the higher visibility and SNR of the retrieved image and the more serious edge blur of the retrieved image will be. This means that the impact of the speckle size of the pseudothermal on GI is double-sided. In order to eliminate the adverse effects of the speckle size, we use a concave lens to modulate the object beam, which is equivalent to modulating the object. By the improved setup, we implement the experiment in which the experimental results are in good agreement with the theoretical analysis results.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61107011 and 61077012), the Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (No. 20123219110021) and Shanghai Aerospace Science and Technology Innovation Fund (SAST) (No. 201350).
References
Pittman T. B. , Shih Y. H. , Strekalov D. V. , Sergienko A. V. (1995) “Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 52 3429 - 3432
Bennink R. S. , Bentley S. J. , Boyd R. W. (2002) “Two-photon coincidence imaging with a classical source,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 113601 -
Gatti A. , Brambilla E. , Bache M. , Lugiato L. A. (2002) “Ghost imaging with thermal light: comparing entanglement and classical correlation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 93602 -
Valencia A. , Scarcelli G. , D’Angelo M. , Shih Y. (2005) “Two-photon imaging with thermal light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 063601 -
Ferri F. , Magatti D. , Gatti A. , Bache M. (2005) “High-resolution ghost image and ghost diffraction experiments with thermal light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 183602 -
Basano L. , Ottonello P. (2006) “Experiment in lensless ghost imaging with thermal light,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 091109 -
Ferri F. , Magatti D. , Sala V. G. , Gatti A. (2008) “Longitudinal coherence in thermal ghost imaging,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 261109 -
Bromberg Y. , Katz O. , Silberberg Y. (2009) “Ghost imaging with a single detector,” Phys. Rev. A 79 053840 -
Meyers R. , Deacon K. S. , Shih Y. (2008) “Ghost-imaging experiment by measuring reflected photons,” Phys. Rev. A 77 041801(R) -
Katz O. , Bromberg Y. , Silberberg Y. (2009) “Compressive ghost imaging,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 131110 -
Zerom P. , Wai K. , Chan C. , Howell J. C. (2011) “Entangledphoton compressive ghost imaging,” Phys. Rev. A 84 061804(R) -
Katkovnik V. , Astola J. (2012) “Compressive sensing computational ghost imaging,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29 1556 - 1567
Cheng J. (2009) “Ghost imaging through turbulent atmosphere,” Opt. Express 17 7916 - 7921
Bina M. , Magatti D. , Molteni M. (2013) “Backscattering differential ghost imaging in turbid media,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 083901 -
Ferri F. , Magatti D. , Lugiato L. A. (2010) “Differential ghost imaging,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 253603 -
Erkmen B. I. , Shapiro J. H. (2009) “Signal-to-noise ratio of Gaussian-state ghost imaging,” Phys. Rev. A 79 023833 -
Magatti D. , Gatti A. , Ferri F. (2009) “Three-dimensional coherence of light speckles: Experiment,” Phys. Rev. A 79 053831 -
Gatti A. , Magatti D. , Ferri F. (2008) “Three-dimensional coherence of light speckles: Theory,” Phys. Rev. A 78 063806 -