Advanced
Integrated-Optic Electric-Field Sensor Utilizing a Ti:LiNbO3 Y-fed Balanced-Bridge Mach-Zehnder Interferometric Modulator With a Segmented Dipole Antenna
Integrated-Optic Electric-Field Sensor Utilizing a Ti:LiNbO3 Y-fed Balanced-Bridge Mach-Zehnder Interferometric Modulator With a Segmented Dipole Antenna
Journal of the Optical Society of Korea. 2014. Dec, 18(6): 739-745
Copyright © 2014, Optical Society of Korea
  • Received : August 08, 2014
  • Accepted : November 11, 2014
  • Published : December 25, 2014
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Share
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Hongsik Jung
Abstract
We have demonstrated a Ti:LiNbO 3 electro-optic electric-field sensor utilizing a 1×2 Y-fed balanced-bridge Mach-Zehnder interferometric (YBB-MZI) modulator, which uses a 3-dB directional coupler at the output and has two complementary output waveguides. A dc switching voltage of ~25 V and an extinction ratio of ~12.5 dB are observed at a wavelength of 1.3 μm. For a 20 dBm rf input power, the minimum detectable electric fields are ~8.21, 7.24, and ~13.3 V/m, corresponding to dynamic ranges of ~10, ~12, and ~7 dB at frequencies of 10, 30, and 50 MHz respectively. The sensors exhibit almost linear response for an applied electric-field intensity from 0.29 V/m to 29.8 V/m.
Keywords
I. INTRODUCTION
Electric-field sensors with broad, flat frequency responses are important tools for electromagnetic compatibility and interference (EMC/EMI) measurements, high-frequency electronic circuit diagnostics, medical equipment field monitoring, radio-frequency reception, and high-power microwave detection, and their importance is increasing with the progress in mobile multimedia communications [1 , 2] . To evaluate EMC, it is necessary to accurately evaluate the strength and distribution of the electromagnetic field surrounding the electronic equipment. Based on the potential applications mentioned above, the requirements for electric-field sensors are as follows: wide frequency bandwidth and large dynamic range; high spatial resolution and little interference with the original field; and high stability and accuracy.
Even though various kinds of sensing modules have been developed, those with photonic links reduce or eliminate some of the inaccuracies and systematic errors that affect measurement techniques using conventional EM-field sensors. They provide electrical isolation, which eliminates ground loops and common-mode electrical pickup between the sensor head and the electronics module. The optical fibers and dielectric components produce minimal field distortion. In addition, they can preserve both the phase and amplitude of high-frequency fields, with good fidelity and low losses. The development of optical-fiber and optoelectronic components for the telecommunications industry has made it possible to implement photonic sensors that are accurate and convenient to use.
In particular, titanium-diffused lithium niobate (Ti:LiNbO 3 ) waveguide devices are suitable for electric-field detection, since the sensor will not perturb the field to be measured. A linear modulator that is passively biased at the optimum linear operating point is desired. This has been demonstrated in Mach-Zehnder interferometers (MZI) and 1×2 directional couplers. The former devices need an intrinsic bias of π/2, where a geometrical path length difference of a quarter of a wavelength is required between the two arms. [3 - 5] However, it is not easy to obtain the proper operating point through only the path length difference, because of fabrication tolerances. The latter devices are automatically biased at the optimum 3−dB operating point by symmetry of design, offering the possibility of a more fabrication-tolerant device than the asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometric modulators. [6 - 8] However, the transfer function is complicated, and the sensor performance will be unacceptable for a certain value (namely the ratio of interaction length to conversion length). [8]
In contrast, a Y-fed balanced-bridge MZI modulator (YBB-MZI) uses a 3−dB coupler at the output and has two complementary output waveguides. [9 - 11] It has a well-defined transfer function for the output optical power versus sensed electric-field intensity, and can be automatically biased at the optimum 3−dB operating point by symmetry of design, offering the possibility of a more fabrication-tolerant device than either an asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometric modulator or an 1×2 directional coupler. A mono-shield gold electrode structure was applied in a YBB-MZI by the Tsinghua University group to detect very high electric-field. [9] In general, the minimum detectable electric-field strength is limited by the relative intensity noise (RIN) of the laser diode. Therefore, the YBB-MZI configuration has been proposed for reducing RIN and improving sensitivity with a balanced optical receiver by a German group. [11]
In this paper, we provide the quantitative theory of a YBB-MZI modulator and report on a fabricated Ti:LiNbO 3 YBB-MZI modulator operating at a wavelength of 1.3 μm. Also, we present in detail the fabrication and design parameters as well as the optical and electrical performances of a packaged electric-field sensor with a segmented dipole patch antenna, including minimum detectable electric-field intensity, dynamic range, and sensitivity.
II. THEORY, FABRICATION, AND PERFORMANCE OF A Ti:LiNbO31×2 YBB-MZI MODULATOR
- 2.1. Device Theory
The YBB-MZI modulator consists of a 3−dB directional coupler at the output and has two complementary output waveguides, as shown in Fig. 1 . For electric-field sensing, a segmented dipole antenna has been arranged between two arms of the MZI structure.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Schematic diagrams and dimensions of (a) Ti:LiNbO3 1×2 YBB-MZI modulator and (b) segmented dipole patch antenna.
A 2×2 directional coupler is characterized by the coupling length Lc , the coupling coefficient κ , and the wavenumber β of the waveguide. Ignoring transmission loss, the transfer matrix of a directional coupler is given by [12]
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The incident single-mode light is equally divided in two by the input 3-dB splitter and can be described as follows:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where θ is the initial phase.
The segmented dipole patch antenna with an electrode induces the electric field on the parallel two arms of the MZI, which results in a change of refractive index and an unbalanced modulation, as shown in Fig. 1 . Before entering the output directional coupler, the light in the two arms has an extrinsic phase mismatch ϕ ( E e ) due to the sensed electric field. The phase mismatch ϕ ( E e ) can be written as
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where le is the length of the electrode connected to the segmented dipole patch antenna, r33 is the electro-optic coefficient of lithium niobate (~30 pm/V), λ is the optical wavelength, ne is the extraordinary refractive index of lithium niobate, Ee is the electric field intensity inside the wave-guide, and Γ (0 < Γ < 1) is the overlap integral between the applied electrical field and the optical field. Therefore, the light entering the output coupler can be expressed as
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Combining (1) with (4), the output power of the YBB-MZI modulator is derived as
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where x = ϕ ( E e )/ π is the normalized phase mismatch, y = Lc / lc is the normalized coupling length, and lc = π /2 k is the coupling conversion length.
The output intensity Po1 is calculated and plotted for the YBB-MZI electric-field sensor, as shown in Fig. 2 . The YBB-MZI sensor has a sinusoidal transfer function for different y values. The value of y only affects the extinction ratio, which can be expressed as sin(π y ). For most cases (where sin(π y )≠0) the transfer function is acceptable, as the extinction ratio only impacts the E -field measurement sensitivity. In order to guarantee the best sensitivity, the coupling length should satisfy the condition
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Simulation results for the light output intensity versus driving voltage with y = 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 1.3.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
- 2.2. Design and Fabrication
A single-mode channel waveguide symmetric, 1×2 Y-fed Balanced-Bridge Mach-Zehnder Interferometric Modulator with a segmented dipole patch antenna was designed for operation at a wavelength of ~1.3 μm in x -cut, y -propagating LiNbO 3 substrate, as shown in Fig. 1 . The device consists of a Y-branch splitter, a phase modulator, and a directional coupler. The overall device structure is similar to that of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with two output ports. The waveguide width is 7.5 μm, and the splitting angle of the Y-branch is 0.6°. The gap width between two adjacent wave-guides of the directional coupler is 5 μm, and the parallel coupling length Lc is 2.8 mm. The distance between the inner edges of the two output waveguides is 50 μm. The length and gap of the modulation electrode connected to the dipole patch antenna are 5 mm and 11 μm respectively, as shown in Fig. 1(b) . The BPM-CAD two- and three-dimensional simulation results of light-wave propagation through the YBB-MZI modulator are shown in Fig. 3 [13] . It is clearly seen that the incident light splits almost equally at the input Y-branch and directional coupler, respectively. The dimensions and arrangement of the segmented dipole patch antenna with a lumped electrode are also shown in Fig. 1(b) .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
(a) Two-dimensional and (b) three-dimensional BPM-CAD simulation results.
The 1×2 YBB-MZI modulators were fabricated on x -cut LiNbO 3 substrate using standard photolithography. Channel waveguides were formed by diffusing a strip of Ti film 1050 Å thick and 7.5 μm wide at 1050℃ in wet ambient. The substrate edges were optically polished to allow butt-coupling and pig-tailing. An SiO 2 buffer layer ~3000 Å thick was deposited using e-beam evaporation and 99.99% pure SiO 2 pellets, to prevent propagation loss due to the optical absorption of the antenna metal. An aluminum segmented dipole antenna electrode ~5000 Å thick was fabricated to allow the sensing of the electric field. Polarization-maintaining single-mode and multimode optical fibers were attached to the input and output waveguides respectively. Figure 4 shows the micrograph of the fabricated device, with attached optical fibers and a segmented dipole patch antenna. The measured insertion loss of the device with input/output fiber was about 8.33 dB, which includes fiber-connector loss, pig-tailing loss, mode-mismatch loss, and propagation loss.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Photograph of the fabricated device with pig-tailed optical fibers.
- 2.3. Evaluation of Performance
We first tested the devices without attached fibers by applying dc voltage. Performance characterization was carried out at a wavelength of 1.3 μm by butt-coupling the device with a pigtailed tunable laser. TE polarized light from the pigtailed tunable laser was butt-coupled to the devices, collected at the output by a microscope objective, and focused onto a photodetector for characterization. TE or TM input polarization was selected by proper adjustment of a fiber polarization controller. Single-mode propagation for TE polarization was observed in the 1×2 YBB-MZI modulator.
When no voltage was applied, the optical output powers of the two branches were almost identical. Therefore, the modulator was intrinsically set at the ~3-dB half-point. When the driving voltage was increased or decreased to ± ~12.5 V, the light in one branch of YBB-MZI modulator was coupled to the other branch, where the light output power of the former branch disappeared and the output of the latter reached its maximum. It was observed that the switching voltage applied to modulate the light power of either branch from a bar state (maximum intensity) to a cross state (minimum intensity) was ~25 V, corresponding to a light-extinction ratio of 12.5 dB. Figure 5 shows the optical output power versus applied voltage, measured by an optical power meter. It exhibits a slightly asymmetric dc output characteristic curve and a switching voltage of ~25 V. The ac modulation responses of the two branches versus driving voltage are further presented in Fig. 6 . The overlapping, smaller sinusoidal curve is the optical signal, while the bigger curve is the applied ac voltage signal at a frequency of ~1 kHz (5 V/div). The output power levels of the two ports are almost the same, and the sinusoidal curves also show a good inverse relation, due to the power being transferred periodically between the two ports.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Measured optical output power intensity versus applied dc voltage.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The 1-kHz ac modulation responses at the (a) upper and (b) lower output port, as shown in Fig. 1(a).
III. MEASUREMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
- 3.1. Experimental Set-Up
Frequency tests, to evaluate the minimum detectable field and frequency response of the fiber-coupled sensor, were performed using a tunable laser operating at a wavelength of 1.3 μm. The incident optical power was of the order of 1.4 mW. Figure 7 shows a block diagram of the experiment setup. The device was tested in a uniform electric field by placing it in a Transverse Electro Magnetic (TEM) cell (Tescom TC-5010A), as indicated in Fig. 7 . The TEM cell is used to generate accurate electro-magnetic (EM) waves over a wide frequency range. EM waves generated in the cell propagate in the transverse mode and have the same characteristics as plane waves. The optical fibers are fed through the sloping walls of the TEM cell and connected to the laser and photodetector via FC/PC fiber-optic connectors. The applied electric-field strength was calculated from the output level and the dimensions of the TEM cell. The −20 - +20 dBm (10 μW - 100 mW) rf input to the TEM cell corresponds to electric-field strength from 0.293 V/m to 23.2 V/m. The actual field intensity experienced on the sensor substrate at 23.2 V/m in TEM cell is 0.66 V/m, due to the high dielectric constant of LiNbO 3 (ε ≈ 35). The rf power travels through the TEM cell in the same direction as the propagation of light in the optical fibers and sensor. [7]
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Block diagram of the test setup for measurement of electric-field sensing and evaluation of frequency response.
- 3.2. Test Results and Discussion
Figure 8 show the spectrum-analyzer outputs for input of 20 dBm to the TEM cell at frequencies of 10, 30, and 50 MHz respectively. The rf power received at the photo-detector was measured as −118.8, −117.8, and −123.2 dBm, as shown in Fig. 8 . The noise floor is about −130 dBm at the same frequencies, as shown in Fig. 8 . The internal electric field of 29.8 V/m in the TEM cell produces a SNR of ~11.2, ~12.2, and ~6.8 dB respectively at those frequencies. Therefore, the minimum detectable electric-field are ~8.21, ~7.24, and ~13.3 V/m, respectively at those three frequencies, based on E min = 29.8×10 (−SNR/20) V/m. Figure 9 shows the sensitivity curves at frequencies of 10, 30, and 50 MHz. We can confirm that the graph shows almost linear response for applied electric field intensity from 0.293 V/m to 23.2 V/m, even though some data were not on the line, yet very close. The device has a dynamic range of about ~10, ~12, and ~7 dB at frequencies of 10, 30, and 50 MHz, respectively. The measuring-frequency response of the sensor at rf input power of 20 dBm rf was measured in the TEM cell, showing almost flat response from 1 to 50 MHz, as seen in Fig. 10 . The high-frequency cutoff results from the resistance of the electrode, which occurs in series with the modulator's capacitance. For an electrode material with higher conductivity, we can expect to obtain a higher frequency cutoff.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The rf spectra of (a) 10 MHz, (b) 50 MHz, and (c) 70 MHz rf input signals into the TEM cell with a power level of 100 mW.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Photodetected signal power versus electric-field strength into the TEM cell at different frequencies.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The frequency response of the sensor.
Theoretical analysis and experimental results show that the YBB-MZI sensor has a superior optical bias and a simple sinusoidal transfer function. For the YBB-MZI, 3-dB optical bias can be achieved when the two waveguide arms are exactly symmetrical, regardless of the refractive index of the waveguide. However, for a conventional MZI a difference in optical length of the two arms is needed to realize a bias (equal to π/2). The bias depends on both the length difference and the waveguide’s effective refractive index, which is affected by fabrication parameters such as titanium thickness, diffusion time, temperature, and ambient. Therefore, the YBB-MZI structure allows much better control of the optical bias than does a conventional MZI.
IV. CONCLUSION
We have fabricated a photonic electric-field sensor that integrates a 1×2 electro-optic Ti:LiNbO 3 Y-fed balanced bridge Mach-Zehnder Interferometric modulator, which provides the sensor with the unique characteristic of an intrinsic 3-dB operating point, due to its symmetric geometry. Theoretical analysis shows that the YBB-MZI structure inherits the advantages of conventional MZI and directional coupler structures: a sinusoidal transfer function and better optical bias control. The sensor has a small device size of 49 × 15 × 1 mm and operates at a wavelength of 1.3 μm. A dc switching voltage of ~25 V and an extinction ratio of ~12.5 dB were observed. The minimum detectable electric fields for this device are ~8.21, 7.24, and ~13.3 V/m, corresponding to a dynamic range of about ~10, 12, and ~7 dB at frequencies of 10, 30, and 50 MHz respectively. The sensor exhibits almost linear response for applied electric-field intensities from 0.29 V/m to 29.8 V/m. In the future, we will try to improve the sensitivity, operating stability, response speed, encapsulation, and detectable frequency range. To realize high sensitivity it is necessary to improve the efficiency of the optical modulator itself, and to reduce the noise of the optical detector, as well as that of light source. Sensitivity limited by shot noise can be achieved by suppressing the influence of the relative intensity noise (RIN) of the laser diode at the optical receiver. This becomes possible using a balanced detection scheme consisting of the presented 1×2 YBB-MZI modulator in combination with a balanced detector. Because the sensitivity of electric-field sensors using various Ti:LiNbO 3 integrated optical modulators is also strongly affected by the structures of the electrode and antenna, we will try to apply various electrode structures and antennas (such as dipole, loop, and segmented electrode) in various integrated modulators.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the national Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010-0021491), and by the 2014 Hongik University Research Fund.
References
Kuwabara N. , Tajima K. , Kobayashi R. , Amemiya F. 1992 “Development and analysis of electric field sensor using LiNbO3 optical modulator,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 34 391 - 396
Zeng R. , Wang B. , Niu B. , Yu Z. 2012 “Development and application of integrated optical sensors for intense E-field measurement,” Sensors 12 11406 - 11434
Jung H. S. 2012 “Photonic electric-field sensor utilizing an asymmetric Ti:LiNbO3 Mach-Zehnder interferometer with a dipole antenna,” Fiber and Integrated Optics 31 343 - 354
Lee T. H. , Hwang F. T. , Shay W. T. , Lee C. T. 2006 “Electromagnetic field sensor using Mach-Zehnder waveguide modulator,” Microwave and Optical Technol. Lett. 48 (9) 1897 - 1899
Naghski D. H. , Boyd J. T. , Jackson H. E. , Sriram S. , Kingsley S. A. , Latess J. 1994 “An integrated photonic Mach-Zehnder interferometer with no electrodes for sensing electric fields,” J. Lightwave Technol. 12 1092 - 1098
An D. , Shi Z. , Sun L. , Taboada J. M. , Zhou Q. , Lu X. 2005 “Polymeric electro-optic modulator based on 1×2 Y-fed directional coupler,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 98 - 104
Jung H. 2013 “Electro-optic electric-field sensors utilizing Ti:LiNbO3 1×2 directional coupler with dipole antennas,” Opt. Eng. 52 064402 -
Howerton M. M. , Bulmer C. H. , Burns W. K. 1988 “Linear 1×2 directional coupler for electromagnetic field detection,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 1850 - 1852
Zeng R. , Wang B. , Yu Z. , Niu B. , Hua Y. 2011 “Integrated optical E-field sensor based on balanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer,” Opt. Eng. 50 114404 -
Twu R.-C. 2007 “Zn-diffused 1×2 balanced-bridge optical switch in a Y-cut lithium niobate,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 19 1269 - 1271
Schwerdt M. , Berger J. , Schuppert B. , Petermann K. 1997 “Integrated optical E-field sensors with a balanced detection scheme,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 39 386 - 390
Nishihara H. , Haruna M. , Suhara T. 1985 Optical Integrated Circuits McGraw-Hill Book Company New York
OptiBPM 9.0: Waveguide Optics Design Software Optiwave