Sumfrequency generation spectra of a Langmuir monolayer on water surface at varying surface areas were studied with twodimensional correlation analysis. Upon enlarging the area/molecule of the Langmuir monolayer, the sumfrequency spectra changed reflecting the conformation change of the alkyl chains of the molecules in the monolayer. These changes stood out more clearly by employing twodimensional correlation analysis of the above sumfrequency spectra. Features not very pronounced in the original spectra such as closelyspaced spectral bands can also be easily distinguished in the twodimensional correlation spectra.
I. INTRODUCTION
Langmuir monolayers, which are monomolecular films of amphiphilic organic molecules at an air/water interface, have been investigated very extensively as a planar model system having a rich phasetransition behavior, and also as a simple system mimicking biological membranes
[1

4]
. Among the important issues concerning Langmuir monolayer are the conformation of molecules in the monolayer and its phasetransition behavior, and many experimental techniques such as Xray diffraction/reflectivity
[5
,
6]
, Brewster angle microscopy
[7
,
8]
, ellipsometry
[6
,
8

11]
, and infrared reflectionabsorption spectroscopy
[9]
have been employed to address these issues in the Langmuir monolayer system. As one of these techniques, sumfrequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy has proven to be the most promising and feasible technique to investigate the molecular conformation of the system
[10
,
12
,
13]
Based on the secondorder nonlinear optical process which is not allowed in the system having inversion symmetry, SFG is a highly surfacesensitive probe to any lightaccessible interface. It is also suitable to monitor the molecular conformation and structure because the sumfrequency response of each vibrational mode is an orientation average of specific moieties of the molecules in the system and changes sensitively with a subtle conformation change of the molecules
[14]
. For example, when longchain molecules in the monolayer are neatly ordered, the directions of methylene (CH
_{2}
) groups in each alkyl chain are oriented oppositely, to make the SF response from methylene groups cancel each other. Therefore, for a compact monolayer with molecules in all
trans
conformation, the methylene group does not contribute to the signal, whereas terminal methyl groups having a net polar orientation only contribute to the SF spectrum
[14]
. On the other hand, when alkyl chains in the monolayer become disordered, methylene bands contribute significantly to the spectrum as compared to the case of all
trans
conformation. Although each specific mode in the spectrum can be resolved by a fitting procedure, it is sometimes ambiguous to analyze sumfrequency spectra when the spectral features are not very pronounced. For example, at around 2950 cm
^{1}
, the spectral component of CH
_{3}
(methyl group) asymmetric stretch mode in alkyl chain is closely overlapped with other modes and the fitting often fails to resolve it from the other bands.
To better interpret the complex spectra, a twodimensional (2D) correlation analysis approach has been employed in IR and Raman spectroscopies
[15]
. By employing the mathematical formalism based on an integral transformation, this technique can help to follow the spectral changes caused by external perturbations more clearly. 2D correlation analysis outputs two twodimensional arrays, called 2D synchronous and asynchronous maps, respectively. These maps work to enhance the spectral resolution by spreading onedimensional data to twodimensional arrays, and have been utilized to analyze many kinds of spectroscopic data in the system undergoing changes by an external perturbation
[15]
. When this technique was first developed in 1986 to enhance an ability to interpret complex spectra, it could be applied only to a timedependent sinusoidal perturbation
[16]
. In the early 1990s its mathematical formalism was generalized based on Fourier transformation of the data, and gained a widespread usage
[15]
. Nowadays, a more advanced formalism based on Hilbert transformation is widely employed for calculation because of its computational efficiency and simplicity
[17]
. To date, 2D correlation analysis has been utilized to analyze many kinds of onedimensional (1D) spectroscopic data including electronic, IR, NMR, Xray and Raman spectra, and was found useful for an indepth study of spectral variations caused by external factors
[18

24]
. Recently, Hore and coworkers first suggested applying 2D correlation analysis to investigate the simulated sumfrequency spectra, and demonstrated that 2D correlation analysis can also be readily applied to the sumfrequency vibrational spectroscopy
[25]
.
In this work, 2D correlation analysis was first applied to the experimental SFG spectra. Langmuir monolayers containing the equalamount mixture of two different kinds of lipid molecules was investigated at several different moleculararea conditions by sumfrequency generation spectroscopy. The change in the 1D spectra indicative of the conformation change of the molecules in the monolayer were shown more clearly in the 2D correlation maps
[26]
. Closelyspaced spectral bands in the CH
_{x}
range (spectral range corresponding to the stretch modes of the alkyl chains) could be easily distinguished in the 2D correlation spectra. Sequential order of the spectral evolutions also came into sight from the asynchronous 2D correlation map. Some spectral components in correlation maps were found out to be shifted from the original position, due to the interference effect in the coherent spectroscopy.
II. THEORY
 2.1. SumFrequency Vibrational Spectroscopy
A typical sumfrequency setup has two inputs of visible and IR beams, having frequencies of
ω
_{vis}
and
ω
_{IR}
to make it spatially overlapped at the sample surface. The output from the sample has a frequency of
ω
_{SFG}
=
ω
_{vis}
+
ω
_{IR}
. According to the theory of surface sumfrequency generation, the intensity of SF output is determined as
[12]
:
Here
χ
s
^{(2)}
is a secondorder nonlinear susceptibility tensor, which can be written in terms of a secondorder hyperpolarizability of the molecule
α
^{(2)}
_{ξηζ}
at the interface, and directional cosine between the laboratory (x,y,z) and the molecular (ξ,η,ζ) axes as follow.
Here
N
_{S}
stands for the number density of molecules,
α_{q}
,
ω_{q}
, and
Γ
_{q}
represent peak strength, resonance frequency, linewidth constant for
q
th vibrational mode, respectively. The sumfrequency response can get a resonance enhancement by tuning the IR input frequency to
ω_{q}
, to yield spectroscopic information of the system.
From Eq. (2), SFG spectroscopy is especially useful to study subtle conformation changes in Langmuir monolayer system, which is a distinguishing feature as compared to the other probes like infrared absorption or Raman spectroscopy. If the chain has all
trans
conformation, half of its methylene (CH
_{2}
) groups have opposite direction to the other half, and their sumfrequency response cancels each other following Eq. (2). On the other hand, the methyl (CH
_{3}
) group response is maximized for ordered monolayer, as all the molecules then have the same orientation. Disorder in the alkyl chain is going to change the symmetry of the system and the relative strength of these two bands, thus it can work as a sensitive indicator of the chain conformation.
 2.2. Twodimensional Correlation Analysis
Twodimensional correlation analysis shows the spectral variation caused by an external perturbation as a pair of twodimensional arrays, each of them called 2D synchronous and asynchronous spectrum of the system. Typical twodimensional analysis approach follows several calculation steps. In this work, we only sketch the formalism based on Hilbert transformation. First, from a set of
m
spectra taken by changing external conditions, one should get a dynamic spectrum by subtracting the average of all the spectra from each spectrum. Then synchronous spectrum Φ(
v
_{1}
,
v
_{2}
) is determined as:
where index
j
represents discrete evolution of external perturbation. Calculation of asynchronous spectrum Ψ(
v
_{1}
,
v
_{2}
) is a little bit trickier:
Interpretation of these twodimensional correlation spectra follows Noda’s rule, named after Noda who first invented this mathematical formalism
[27]
. A peak in a synchronous 2D spectrum represents the frequency bands whose intensities vary in phase. Since every peak varies in phase with itself, a 2D synchronous spectrum always shows diagonal peaks. And there can be also offdiagonal peaks called cross peaks. If there is a positive crosspeak at (
v
_{1}
,
v
_{2}
) in the synchronous spectrum, it implies that the intensities of the signals at
v
_{1}
and
v
_{2}
change simultaneously to the same direction. On the other hand, a negative cross peak at (
v
_{1}
,
v
_{2}
) in the synchronous spectrum stands for a simultaneous change in opposite directions of the signals at
v
_{1}
and
v
_{2}
. Asynchronous spectrum describes spectral changes which are temporally separated
[27]
. An asynchronous peak develops when the intensities of signal at different frequency bands vary out of phase. If a change in the band at
v
_{1}
takes place dominantly before a change in the band at
v
_{2}
the asynchronous cross peak at (
v
_{1}
,
v
_{2}
) is positive. Conversely, a negative peak at (
v
_{1}
,
v
_{2}
) implies that the change at
v
_{1}
follows the change at
v
_{2}
.
As these 2D spectra are derived from a series of 1D spectra, these maps can determine the peak positions more accurately when two or more spectral modes are close together and cannot be resolved easily. It can also distinguish the processes that look very similar with the conventional 1D spectra. The case of (1) pure peak shift of single band, and (2) two overlapped peaks change in intensities under external perturbation sometimes cannot be distinguished easily in the 1D spectra. Dluhy and coworkers compared these two cases in IR absorption spectroscopy with 2D correlation analysis, and reported that a 2D asynchronous spectrum shows totally different appearance in the two cases. The former (‘frequency shifting’ model) shows a quartet of cross peaks, and the latter (‘overlapped peaks’ model) shows a doublet of cross peaks which is clearly different from the former one
[28]
.
III. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION & DATA TREATMENT
The 1,2dipalmitoyl3trimethylammoniumpropane (16:0 TAP or DPTAP) and 1,2dimyristoyl
sn
glycero3phospho (1'racglycerol) (14:0 PG or DMPG) molecules were used to build a monolayer. Both are purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids Inc. at 99+% stated purity. Sample solution of lipids was prepared by dissolving in a pure chloroform solution (>99.9%, HPLC grade, Aldrich) and spread onto a water subphase in a Langmuir trough
[26]
. The barriers of the trough were gently pushed or pulled to regulate the designated molecular area, and surface pressure of the monolayer was monitored simultaneously. The subphase was ultrapure water (18.2MΩcm) purchased from J. T. Baker.
The SFG measurement was conducted with a picosecond Nd:YAG pulsed laser (Continuum PY6110, 40ps pulse width, 10 Hz repetition rate) and a LiNbO
_{3}
based optical parametric generator/amplifier (OPG/OPA) system pumped by this laser. The OPG/OPA system provided the tunable IR input ranging from 2.5 μm to 4.0 μm in wavelength, and the secondharmonic of the laser from potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) crystal produced the visible input (532 nm). Typical input energies were 1 mJ/pulse for visible and ~200 μJ/pulse for tunable IR. Their incident angles were β
_{vis}
= 45° and β
_{IR}
= 60°, respectively. These two beams were overlapped on the sample surface within the beam diameter of ~200 μm. The SF output in the reflection direction was spatially and spectrally filtered and detected by a photomultiplier tube. The spectra were taken at typically 5 cm
^{1}
intervals and each data point was an average of signals accumulated over at least 200 laser shots. The spectra were normalized against the SF spectrum from a zcut quartz sample used as a reference. Input/output polarization combination of SSP (Spolarized SF output, Spolarized visible input and Ppolarized IR input) was employed. 1D spectra were smoothed by averaging 3 adjacent data points as needed. Spectra were also normalized by dividing each spectrum with corresponding spectral area, as tabulated in
Table 1
. The array of the 1D spectra after normalization were treated with a labmade MATLAB program for 2D correlation calculation, based on the generalized 2D correlation approach developed and modified by I. Noda.
Normalization factor for each spectrum
Normalization factor for each spectrum
Schematics of the SFG experimental setup.
IV. RESULT & DISCUSSION
The SFG spectra of 1:1 mixture of DPTAP and DMPG Langmuir monolayers on water for five different surface areas, normalized by the total area under each spectrum, are plotted in
Fig. 2
. Here the monolayers with specific surface areas were prepared by compression of the monolayers with trough barrier, and regulated with an assistance of the pressurearea isotherm measured before
[26]
. Spectra show a gradual increase in CH
_{2}
symmetric stretch mode (~2853 cm
^{1}
) and decrease in CH
_{3}
symmetric stretch mode (~2875 cm
^{1}
) with an increase in the surface area, which implies a conformation change of monolayer from the condensed phase to the liquid phase. It would also cause the intensity changes in CH
_{2}
asymmetric, CH
_{3}
asymmetric stretch modes, and CH
_{3}
Fermi resonance mode (around 2919 cm
^{1}
, 2959 cm
^{1}
and 2936 cm
^{1}
, respectively), which can be hardly discriminated in the spectra because of their overlapping within narrow frequency band.
SFG spectra of DPTAP/DMPG monolayers at different molecular areas at the surface.
For a better discrimination of these features, twodimensional correlation analysis was conducted on the spectra.
Figure 3
shows a contour plot of 2D synchronous map (a) and a 2D asynchronous map (b) for the SF spectra normalized with spectral area shown in
Fig. 2
. In the synchronous map, a negative peak at (2870 cm
^{1}
, 2848 cm
^{1}
) indicates an anticorrelation between CH
_{2}
and CH
_{3}
symmetric stretch modes clearly, which agrees with onedimensional spectral analysis. Twodimensional correlation spectrum analysis shows its superiority in characterizing the closelyspaced spectral modes in the region ranging from 2900 cm
^{1}
to 2960 cm
^{1}
. Here onedimensional analysis fails to distinguish different spectral components, whereas 2D synchronous map clearly shows the distinct negative and positive peaks. Negative peak at (2870 cm
^{1}
, 2910 cm
^{1}
) implies the existence of a spectral component located around 2910 cm
^{1}
negatively correlated with CH
_{3}
stretch mode at 2870 cm
^{1}
. This feature can be accounted for as the appearance of CH
_{2}
asymmetric stretch mode with an increased disorder in the alkyl chain. 2D synchronous map also shows a positive maximum at (2870 cm
^{1}
, 2940 cm
^{1}
), suggesting the spectral feature positively correlated with CH
_{3}
symmetric stretch mode at 2870 cm
^{1}
. The peak is due to a decrease of CH
_{3}
Fermi resonance mode (~2936 cm
^{1}
) simultaneous with a decrease of CH
_{3}
symmetric stretch mode as the molecular area increases. In the asynchronous spectrum in
Fig. 3(b)
, the most prominent are the negative peaks located at (2870 cm
^{1}
, 2850 cm
^{1}
) and (2940 cm
^{1}
, 2850 cm
^{1}
). These asynchronous cross peaks indicate a different rate of change of these bands, and we deduce that the spectral change for CH
_{2}
mode (~2850 cm
^{1}
) took place earlier than CH
_{3}
modes at 2870 cm
^{1}
and 2940 cm
^{1}
.
2D correlation maps of SF spectra of DPTAP DMPG monolayer. (a) Synchronous map, (b) Asynchronous map.
One more thing to remark is that the locations of 2D spectral components are slightly shifted with respect to the conventional peak positions
[14]
. For example, in the synchronous map, the cross peak of CH
_{2}
symmetric stretch mode (conventionally about 2853 cm
^{1}
) and CH
_{3}
symmetric stretch mode (~2875 cm
^{1}
) is located at (2848 cm
^{1}
, 2870 cm
^{1}
), a few wavenumbers shifted from the original position. These kinds of spectral shifts also take place in the asynchronous map. These phenomena are considered as an artifact due to the intrinsic nature of the SFG spectroscopy. In conventional spectroscopy such as Raman, fluorescence, and IR absorption, the signals contributing to the spectral band (e.g. resonant signal and nonresonant background) are added incoherently as a spectral intensity. But in the sumfrequency generation spectroscopy, the signals contributing to a certain spectral feature are first added as electric fields. The field thus summedup is squared to yield the SFG spectrum we measure experimentally, and the interference between spectral components can be seen in the spectrum when bandoverlap or nonresonant contribution is significant. Recently S. Roy and coworkers reported that a spectral shift can be seen as an artifact when 2D correlation analysis is applied to the coherent spectroscopy
[25]
. To avoid this artifact, in the future study one can apply 2D correlation analysis to 1D imaginary spectra, which can be either deduced by fitting the spectrum with a multipeak Lorentzian or measured with heterodyne SFG experiments
[29]
.
V. CONCLUSION
Langmuir monolayers consisting 1:1 mixture of DPTAP and DMPG at different area/molecule were investigated with sumfrequency vibrational spectroscopy, and these spectra were further analyzed by using twodimensional correlation spectroscopy. 2D correlation maps were able to better resolve closelyspaced spectral components, for example CH
_{2}
asymmetric stretch mode and CH
_{3}
Fermi resonance mode of the spectra. The 2D asynchronous map indicated the order of spectral evolution that the change in the CH
_{2}
mode precedes the change in the CH
_{3}
mode. Due to the interference between the bands in the SF spectra, spectral features in the correlation maps are found to be shifted from their originally assigned locations, which indicate that the care needs to be taken in analyzing the coherent 1D spectra by using the 2D correlation method.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MEST) Nos. 20110017435 and 20110031496.
Brockman H.
1999
“Lipid monolayers: Why use half a membrane to characterize proteinmembrane interactions?,”
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
9
438 
443
DOI : 10.1016/S0959440X(99)80061X
Montal M.
,
Mueller P.
1972
“Formation of bimolecular membranes from lipid monolayers and a study of their electrical properties,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
69
3561 
3566
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.69.12.3561
Giess F.
,
Friedrich M. G.
,
Heberle J.
,
Naumann R. L.
,
Knoll W.
2004
“The proteintethered lipid bilayer: A novel mimic of the biological membrane,”
Biophys. J.
87
3213 
3220
DOI : 10.1529/biophysj.104.046169
Tanaka M.
,
Sackmann E.
2005
“Polymersupported membranes as models of the cell surface,”
Nature
437
656 
663
DOI : 10.1038/nature04164
Shih M.
,
Bohanon T.
,
Mikrut J.
,
Zschack P.
,
Dutta P.
1992
“Xraydiffraction study of the superliquid region of the phase diagram of a Langmuir monolayer,”
Phys. Rev. A
45
5734 
5737
DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.5734
Wasserman S. R.
,
Whitesides G. M.
,
Tidswell I. M.
,
Ocko B. M.
,
Pershan P. S.
,
Axe J. D.
1989
“The structure of selfassembled monolayers of Alkylsiloxanes on silicon: A comparison of results from ellipsometry and lowangle xray reflectivity,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
111
5852 
5861
DOI : 10.1021/ja00197a054
Loste E.
,
Marti E. D.
,
Zarbakhsh A.
,
Meldrum F. C.
2003
“Study of calcium carbonate precipitation under a series of fatty acid Langmuir monolayers using brewster angle microscopy,”
Langmuir
19
2830 
2837
DOI : 10.1021/la026837k
Huo Q.
,
Russev S.
,
Hasegawa T.
,
Nishijo J.
,
Umemura J.
,
Puccetti G.
,
Russell K. C.
,
Leblanc R. M.
2000
“A Langmuir monolayer with a nontraditional molecular architecture,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
122
7890 
7897
DOI : 10.1021/ja984158j
Gun J.
,
Iscovici R.
,
Sagiv J.
1984
“On the formation and structure of selfassembling monolayers: II. A comparative study of LangmuirBlodgett and adsorbed films using ellipsometry and IR reflectionabsorption spectroscopy,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
101
201 
213
DOI : 10.1016/00219797(84)900201
Sionnest P. G.
,
Hunt J. H.
,
Shen Y. R.
1987
“Sumfrequency vibrational spectroscopy of a Langmuir film: Study of molecular orientation of a twodimensional system,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
59
1597 
1600
DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1597
Seok S.
,
Kim T. J.
,
Hwang S. Y.
,
Kim Y. D.
,
Vaknin D.
,
Kim D.
2009
“Imaging of collapsed fatty acid films at airwater interfaces,”
Langmuir
25
9262 
9269
DOI : 10.1021/la900096a
Sung W.
,
Kim D.
,
Shen Y. R.
2013
“Sumfrequency vibrational spectroscopic studies of Langmuir monolayers,”
Curr. Appl. Phys.
13
619 
632
DOI : 10.1016/j.cap.2012.12.002
Sung W.
,
Vaknin D.
,
Kim D.
2013
“Different adsorption behavior of rare earth and metallic ion complexes on Langmuir monolayers probed by sumfrequency generation spectroscopy,”
Journal of the Optical Society of Korea
17
(1)
10 
15
DOI : 10.3807/JOSK.2013.17.1.010
Zhuang X.
,
Miranda P. B.
,
Kim D.
,
Shen Y. R.
1999
“Mapping molecular orientation and conformation at interfaces by surface nonlinear optics,”
Phys. Rev. B
59
12632 
12640
DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.12632
Noda I.
1993
“Generalized twodimensional correlation method applicable to infrared, Raman, and other types of spectroscopy,”
Appl. Spectrosc.
47
1329 
1336
DOI : 10.1366/0003702934067694
Noda I.
2000
“Determination of twodimensional correlation spectra using the Hilbert transform,”
Appl. Spectrosc.
54
994 
999
DOI : 10.1366/0003702001950472
Kačuráková M.
,
Smith A. C.
,
Gidley M. J.
,
Wilson R. H.
2002
“Molecular interactions in bacterial cellulose composites studied by 1D FTIR and dynamic 2D FTIR spectroscopy,”
Carbohydr. Res.
337
1145 
1153
DOI : 10.1016/S00086215(02)001027
Ruan Q.X.
,
Zhou P.
2008
“Sodium ion effect on silk fibroin conformation characterized by solidstate NMR and generalized 2D NMRNMR correlation,”
J. Mol. Sturct.
883884
85 
90
DOI : 10.1016/j.molstruc.2007.11.055
Shasilov V. A.
,
Lednev I. K.
2008
“2D correlation deep UV resonance raman spectroscopy of early events of lysozyme fibrillation: Kinetic mechanism and potential interpretation pitfalls,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
130
309 
317
DOI : 10.1021/ja076225s
Noda I.
,
Liu Y.
,
Ozaki Y.
1996
“Twodimensional correlation spectroscopy study of temperaturedependent spectral variations of NMethylacetamide in the pure liquid state. 2. Twodimensional Raman and infraredRaman heterospectral analysis,”
J. Phys. Chem.
100
8674 
8680
DOI : 10.1021/jp9534141
Jung Y. M.
,
Matusewicz B. C.
,
Ozaki Y.
2000
“Twodimensional infrared, twodimensional Raman, and twodimensional infrared and Raman heterospectral correlation studies of secondary structure of âLactoglobulin in buffer solutions,”
J. Phys. Chem. B
104
7812 
7817
DOI : 10.1021/jp0008041
Jung Y. M.
,
Shin H. S.
,
Matusewicz B. C.
,
Noda I.
,
Kim S. B.
2002
“Characterization of transition temperatures of a LangmuirBlodgett film of Poly(tertbutyl methacrylate) by twodimensional correlation spectroscopy and principal component analysis,”
Appl. Spectrosc.
56
1568 
1574
DOI : 10.1366/000370202321116039
Choi H. C.
,
Jung Y. M.
,
Noda I.
,
Kim S. B.
2003
“A study of the mechanism of the electrochemical reaction of lithium with CoO by twodimensional soft xray absorption spectroscopy (2D XAS), 2D Raman, and 2D heterospectral XASRaman correlation analysis,”
J. Phys. Chem. B
107
5806 
5811
DOI : 10.1021/jp030438w
Roy S.
,
Post J. S.
,
Hung K.K.
,
Stege U.
,
Hore D. K.
2014
“2D correlation analysis in vibrational sumfrequency generation spectroscopy,”
J. Mol. Struct.
1069
103 
111
DOI : 10.1016/j.molstruc.2013.10.074
Sung W.
,
Seok S.
,
Kim D.
,
Tian C.
,
Shen Y. R.
2010
“Sumfrequency spectroscopic study of Langmuir monolayers of lipids having oppositely charged headgroups,”
Langmuir
26
18266 
18272
DOI : 10.1021/la103129z
Noda I.
,
Ozaki Y.
2004
TwoDimensional Correlation SpectroscopyApplications in Vibrational and Optical Spectroscopy
John Wiley & Sons
Chichester, UK
Elmore D. L.
,
Dluhy R. A.
2000
“Application of 2D IR correlation analysis to phase transitions in Langmuir monolayer films,”
Colloids Surf. A
171
225 
239
DOI : 10.1016/S09277757(99)005427
Stiopkin I. V.
,
Jayathilake H. D.
,
Bordenyuk A. N.
,
Benderskii A. V.
2008
“Heterodynedetected vibrational sum frequency generation spectroscopy,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
130
2271 
2275
DOI : 10.1021/ja076708w