Applications of Digital Holography in Biomedical Microscopy
Applications of Digital Holography in Biomedical Microscopy
Journal of the Optical Society of Korea. 2010. Jun, 14(2): 77-89
Copyright ©2010, Optical Society of Korea
  • Received : May 17, 2010
  • Accepted : June 07, 2011
  • Published : June 25, 2010
Export by style
Cited by
About the Authors
Myung-K Kim

Digital holography (DH) is a potentially disruptive new technology for many areas of imaging science, especially in microscopy and metrology. DH offers a number of significant advantages such as the ability to acquire holograms rapidly, availability of complete amplitude and phase information of the optical field, and versatility of the interferometric and image processing techniques. This article provides a review of the digital holography, with an emphasis on its applications in biomedical microscopy. The quantitative phase microscopy by DH is described including some of the special techniques such as optical phase unwrapping and holography of total internal reflection. Tomographic imaging by digital interference holography (DIH) and related methods is described, as well as its applications in ophthalmic imaging and in biometry. Holographic manipulation and monitoring of cells and cellular components is another exciting new area of research. We discuss some of the current issues, trends, and potentials.
Digital holography (DH) is a potentially disruptive new technology for many areas of imaging science, especially in microscopy and metrology. By replacing the photochemical procedures of conventional (analog) holography with electronic imaging, a door opens to a wide range of new capabilities. Although many of the remarkable properties of holography have been known for decades, their practical applications have been constrained because of the cumbersome procedures and stringent requirements on equipment. In DH, the holographic interference pattern is optically generated by superposition of object and reference beams, which is digitally sampled by a CCD camera and transferred to a computer as an array of numbers. The propagation of optical field is completely and accurately described by diffraction theory, which allows numerical reconstruction of the image as an array of complex numbers representing the amplitude and phase of the optical field. DH offers a number of significant advantages such as the ability to acquire holograms rapidly, availability of complete amplitude and phase information of the optical field, and versatility of the interferometric and image processing techniques. Indeed, digital holography by numerical diffraction of optical fields allows imaging and image processing techniques that are difficult or infeasible in real space holography [1 , 2] .
Dennis Gabor invented holography in 1948 while attempting to improve upon the resolution of electron microscopy, where the correction of electron lens aberrations posed increasing technical difficulty [3] . Instead of attempting to perfect the electron imaging lens, Gabor dispensed it altogether and realized that the diffraction pattern of the electron beam contained complete information regarding the amplitude and phase of the electron wave. The holography principle was immediately applied to recording and imaging by visible light [4] . But it had to wait for two critical inventions before the full potential was to be realized. One was the powerful coherent source of light in laser to provide high quality interference contrast. The other, due to Leith and Upatnieks in 1962, was the off-axis illumination with a separate reference wave, thus eliminating the problem of the zero-order and twin images of the Gabor’s on-axis configuration [5] . Soon many new techniques and applications of holography began to develop.
Although microscopy was a critical motivator for the invention of holography, its development in biological and medical imaging applications has been very limited, compared, for example, to holographic interferometry of mechanical systems. The first holographic microscopy of living organism was obtained by Knox in 1966, demonstrating the ability to record the optical field of a whole sample volume [6] . Another example is the analysis of the tympanic membrane vibrations in cats [7] . The cumbersome procedures, inability to view and process real time images, and the speckle noise problems all likely have contributed to the lack of enthusiasm, these factors perhaps being more crucial in biomedical microscopy than in mechanical interferometry and metrology.
Digital holography replaces the physical and chemical recording processes with electronic ones and the optical reconstruction with numerical computation. In 1967, J. Goodman demonstrated the feasibility of numerical reconstruction of an image from a Fourier hologram detected by a vidicon camera [8] . Schnars and Jueptner, in 1994, were the first to use a CCD camera directly connected to a computer as the input and compute the image in a Fresnel holography set up [9] . In the last decade or so, many powerful and useful techniques and applications of DH have been developed. A single hologram is used to numerically focus on the holographic image at any distance [10 , 11] . Direct access to the phase information leads to quantitative phase microscopy with nanometer sensitivity of transparent or reflective phase objects [12 , 13] , and allows further manipulations such as aberration correction [14] . Multi-wavelength optical phase unwrapping is a fast and robust method for removing 2π-discontinuities [15] . Suppression of the zero-order and the twin images by phase-shifting digital holography allows efficient use of the pixel array [16] . Holography of low coherence light is an important issue and DH again provides novel solutions in this regard [17 , 18] . Optical scanning holography (OSH) is capable of producing holograms of fluorescence [19 - 22] .
The quantitative phase microscopy by digital holography has been applied to imaging various cell types, including SKOV-3 ovarian cancer cells [23] , fibroblast cells [11] , testate amoeba [24] , diatom skeletons [25] , and red blood cells [26] . It is also used to investigate various cellular dynamics such as drug-induced changes in cells [27 - 29] . In [30] , digital holographic microscopy (DHM) is used to monitor laser microsurgery on cells, for quantitative evaluation of the damage and repair of cells and cellular organelles in real time. In [26] , live erythrocyte (red blood cell) membrane fluctuations were measured. Deformation of phospholipid vesicles in a microchannel flow was measured as a model of red blood cells in capillary flow [31] . Time-varying cellular and subcellular features are imaged with sub-micron, diffraction-limited resolution, and movies of holographic amplitude and phase images of living microbes and cells are created from a series of holograms and reconstructed with numerically adjustable focus [11] . Digital Gabor holography (DGH) is excellent for imaging 3D distribution of particulate microbes [32 , 33] . Underwater instruments have been constructed for monitoring marine planktons and particulates [34 , 35] . DGH was used to investigate the flow field generated by the appendages of a copepod [36] . Deformation of tissues under mechanical impact has been imaged using double pulse digital holography [37] . Recognition and identification of biological cells by digital holography was studied [38] . The continuing unabated advances in digital imaging and computing technologies assure increasing ranges of applications and capabilities of digital holography.
This article provides a partial overview of the digital holography, as well as a description of some of the recent efforts from the author’s laboratory, with an emphasis on its applications in biomedical microscopy. We start in Sec. 2 with a summary of the basic principles of digital holography. In Sec. 3, the quantitative phase microscopy by DH is described including some of the special techniques such as optical phase unwrapping and holography of total internal reflection. Section 4 describes techniques of holographic tomography including digital interference holography and its applications in ophthalmic imaging and in biometry. Holographic manipulation and monitoring of cells and cellular components is another exciting new area of research, described in Sec. 5. We discuss some of the current issues, trends, and potentials.
The theory of holography have been considered by many authors for both analog [39] and digital implementations [10 , 40 - 46] . For DH, a main issue is efficient and accurate computation of the diffraction integral. For general purpose, three most common approaches for DH calculation are the Huygens convolution, Fresnel transform and angular spectrum methods. We start by writing down the Fresnel-Kirchoff diffraction formula for the general problem of diffraction from a two-dimensional aperture depicted in Fig. 1 [47] . Given the optical field E0(x0, y0) over the input plane 0 at z = 0, the field E(x, y) over the output plane  at z is, with the wavelength λ2π/k,
PPT Slide
Lager Image
This is a convolution integral
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where the point spread function (PSF) is
PPT Slide
Lager Image
representing the Huygens spherical wavelet. The Huygensconvolution is usually computed with three Fourier transforms [48] . Fresnel or paraxial approximation of the PSF is
PPT Slide
Lager Image
and the diffraction field is
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The Fresnel transform method therefore involves a single Fourier transform [49]. An alternative approach to describe diffraction is by analysis of the angular spectrum, as
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where F {E0} is the angular spectrum of the input field, and the exponential is the propagation phase factor. The angular spectrum method, or plane wave expansion, requires two Fourier transforms [50 , 51] .
The numerical diffraction methods of Huygens convolution (Eq. 2), Fresnel transform (Eq. 5), and angular spectrum (Eq. 6) are compared using simulation examples in Fig. 2 ,
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Geometry of diffraction. 0: input plane and :output plane
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Numerical diffraction by (a) Huygens convolutionmethod, (b) Fresnel transform method, and (c) angularspectrum method. The input pattern is a letter “F” in anopaque screen of 100×100 μm2 area with 256×256 pixelsand the wavelength is assumed to be λ=0.633 μm. Thecolumns show phase patterns of the diffracted field atdistances of z = 10, 30, 50, 100, and 200 μm, as wellas yz-cross sections of the propagation over a range ofz=0~250 μm along a vertical line through the letter “F”.
where the diffraction phase images of the letter “F” are calculated at several propagation distances. It also shows yz-cross sections of the propagation over a range of distance. Several observations can be made. The pixel resolution does not change with distance for the convolution and angular spectrum methods, whereas the the pixel size and the output plane size grows linearly with the distance for Fresnel transform method. Also evident is that there is severe distortion at distances shorter than ?        for the Fresnel method. The short-distance behavior is better for the convolution method, but the angular spectrum method yields valid diffraction images for all short distances, including zero. The angular spectrum method is based on propagation of plane waves. Sampling of the plane waves by the discrete pixels of CCD does not vary with the distance, and therefore the angular spectrum method does not have any distance limitations. On the other hand, the Fresnel transform method is based on the propagation of spherical wavefronts(or its parabolic approximation). When the center of curvature is too close to the CCD array, local fringe frequency on the CCD plane may be higher than Nyquist frequency. Moreover, there also is a maximum distance that yields correct diffraction pattern for Fresnel transform method. For large enough distances the fringe period becomes larger than the entire CCD array, failing to record any diffraction information. Angular spectrum does not have this limitation either. It is to be noted that the terminology and relevant approximations of the various methods in the literature are not uniform and comparison of results, such as the minimum and maximum distances, must be made with some care.
The effect of digital sampling on the PSF of holographic image formation is proportional to
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where X0 and [Equation Ommited] are the size of the CCD array and the pixel pitch, respectively [40, 44]. The sinc function, having a width of [Equation Ommited], is due to the finite fill factor, 0 < γ < 1, of the light-sensitive area of each pixel. For a small fill factor, γ→0, the image is uniform in amplitude throughout the image plane. On the other hand, integration over the pixel area with larger fill factor results in vignetting, especially for shorter image distance z. The sine-over-sine factor gives the lateral resolution of a point image to be [Equation Ommited], which shows the expected dependence on the numerical aperture of the camera array [52] . The axial resolution is given by [Equation Ommited]   ?
Other methods of numerical diffraction include wavelet or Fresnelet approach [53] , fractional Fourier transform for highly astigmatic systems [54] , and windowed Fourier analysis [55] . The Wigner space diagram is utilized for spacebandwidth analysis of holographic image formation [41] . Three-dimensional (3D) optical transfer function (OTF) for DHM is given in [56] . Numerical techniques are also available for addressing specific purposes such as dc and twin term removal [57 - 59] diffraction onto an inclined planes [51 , 60 , 61] , automatic focus detection [62 , 63] , two-step Fresnel diffraction method for pixel resolution control [64] , and aberration compensation [65] .
Many biological specimens, such as living cells and their intracellular components, are mostly transparent, making it difficult for conventional bright field microscopies. Current methods for imaging transparent objects, such as dark field microscopy, Zernike phase contrast, and differential interference contrast, are not capable of quantitative imaging and analysis. Digital holographic microscopy, because of the direct access to the phase profile, provides highly efficient and versatile phase imaging modality and it is undergoing rapid development. Subnanometer resolution of optical thickness has been demonstrated [13] , the refractive index and physical thickness can be separated from the optical thickness [66] , and optical phase unwrapping using three LEDs of different wavelengths has been demonstrated [67 , 68] . The ability to emulate various microscopy methods - including bright field, dark field, phase contrast, and DIC, from DHM has also been demonstrated [69] . Commercial holographic microscopes are coming on to market.
Figure 3 illustrates typical processes for quantitative phase microscopy by digital holography, with images of a layer of onion cells. Interference of object and reference optical fields results in the hologram, Fig. 3 (a), which is what the CCD camera records. The holographic microscopy apparatus typically consists of an interferometer, based on Michelson or Mach-Zehnder configurations, with microscopic imaging optics, to project on the camera a magnified image of the holographic interference pattern. The angular spectrum normally contains a zero-order and a pair of first-order components, corresponding to the twin holographic images, as in Fig. 3 (b). One of the first-order components can be separated from the others with a numerical band-pass filter if the off-axis angle of the reference beam is properly adjusted. Numerical diffraction of the hologram results in the reconstructed optical field as a matrix of complex numbers, yielding the amplitude ( Fig. 3 (c)) and phase ( Fig. 3( d)) images. The phase image has 2π -discontinuities, if the object thickness variation is more than a wavelength. The phase image can be unwrapped using a phase-unwrapping numerical algorithm, as is done in Fig. 3 (e), and rendered as a pseudo- 3D graphics in Fig. 3 (f).
A few more examples of digital holographic phase microscopy are presented in Fig. 4 [23]. These images represent profiles of optical thickness for light transmitted through the cells on slide glass. In particular, Fig. 4 d) is an optical thickness profile of a glass substrate surface, where the full vertical scale is 30 nm. The rms noise is about 3 nm in optical thickness or less than 2 degrees in phase. Such high precision in optical thickness allows imaging of subtle variations in physical and biochemical conditions in cellular and intracellular structures. For example, an index variation of Δn = 0.0003 of a 10 ㎛ thick layer can be readily
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Digital holography procedure: see text for details.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Examples of quantitative phase microscopy by digital holography. (a) SKOV-3 ovarian cancer cell, (b) red bloodcells, c) cheek epithelial cell, (d) profile of glass surface.
discerned by digital holographic phase microscopy.
- 3.1. Multi-Wavelength Optical Phase Unwrapping (OPU)
The digital holography is thus capable of high resolution quantitative phase microscopic imaging. On the other hand, the phase images contain 2π-discontinuities for objects of optical depth greater than the wavelength. Most of the phase unwrapping algorithms require subjective assumptions for detection of phase discontinuity, cannot properly handle certain types of phase topology, and are highly computationintensive. We have previously introduced a dual-wavelength phase-imaging technique that removes the 2π-discontinuities by using two different wavelengths for generating two phase maps and comparing them. The result is a new phase map with a synthetic wavelength A12= [Equation Ommited] . We have applied the dual-wavelength phase imaging method to 3D imaging of SKOV-3 ovarian cancer cells [70]. Figure 5(a) shows the intensity image, which is similar to what one can see using the ordinary microscope, while Fig. 5(b) displays a single wavelength wrapped phase image, and Fig. 5(c) shows the dual-wavelength unwrapped phase image. Finally, Fig. 5(d) displays a pseudo-3D rendering of the unwrapped phase map. The images in the Fig. 6(a) and (b) shows a different confluent area of the same sample generated by optical and software unwrapping, respectively. Notice that the software unwrapping algorithm erroneously
PPT Slide
Lager Image
5. Confluent SKOV-3 ovarian cancer cells: (a) amplitude image, (b) single-wavelength phase image, (c) dualwavelength phase image and (d) pseudo-3D rendering. The FOV (field of view) is 92×92 ㎛2.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Comparison between (a) optical and (b) softwareunwrapping.
created a phase step on the lower right corner, where lack of light intensity caused excess phase noise. The optical unwrapping, however, still renders correct unwrapped profile.
- 3.2. Total Internal Reflection Holographic Microscopy (TIRHM)
The microscopy of cellular adhesion is important for a deeper understanding of cellular motion and morphogenesis. Cell-substrate interactions, including attachment, spreading, morphology changes, and migration, require a complex series of events to occur in a regulated and integrated manner. Currently, the primary tools for imaging and studying these surface processes have been total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRF) and interference reflection microscopy (IRM). The TIRF images reveal localization of fusion protein in cell focal adhesions at the substrate interface in contrast to the blur produced by out-of-plane fluorescence in the epi-illumination image. While this provides for excellent functional imaging, information on the morphology of the cellular membrane surface is largely absent in TIRF. In IRM, light waves reflected from two surfaces of the cellsubstrate interface produces interference fringes, thus allowing estimation of the interface thickness profile. While this allows for a qualitative interpretation of the surface profile, the interference image of the interface is usually complicated by the reflection image of the cell body and its contents.
In order to address these issues and characterize the cell substrate interface, evanescent wave surface profiling is incorporated with digital holographic microscopy (DHM) into a new imaging technique termed total internal reflection holographic microscopy (TIRHM) [23 , 71] . TIRHM uses a prism in TIR as an imager in the object arm of a Mach- Zehnder digital holographic microscope. As depicted in Fig. 7 , the presence of microscopic organisms, cell-substrate interfaces, adhesions, and tissue structures on the prism’s TIR face causes modulation of the phase front of the TIR-reflected light, and the digital holography is used to image the modulated phase profile, allowing for quantitative imaging of the sample’s focal adhesions at the samplesubstrate interface. Figure 8 is an example of TIRHM of live Amoeba Proteus, placed in a covered reservoir directly on the hypotenuse face of the prism, where psuedopod move
PPT Slide
Lager Image
(a) Mach-Zehnder TIR digital holographic microscopethat incorporates: 50:50 fiber optic coupler, beamexpander/collimator, beam combiner, microscope objectives,and CCD. (b) Modulation of phase front by the interactionof the evanescent wave and a cell adhesion.
ment may be discerned. Based upon the analysis of phase images, one can evaluate which portions of the cell membrane are within the range of the evanescent field, measure the phase shift for those portions of the cell, and use this phase shift for quantitative imaging of the sample’s focal adhesions at the sample-substrate interface.
One of the important challenges for biomedical optics is noninvasive three dimensional imaging, and various techniques have been proposed and available. For example, confocal scanning microscopy provides high-resolution sectioning and in-focus images of a specimen. However, it is intrinsically limited in frame rate due to serial acquisition of the image pixels. Another technique, optical coherence tomography (OCT), is a scanning microscopic imaging technique based on low coherence interferometry to coherently gate backscattered signal from different depths in the object
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Amoeba Proteus time lapse TIRHM phase images.
[72] . Tomography by holography is possible through diversity of wavelengths as in digital interference holography (DIH) [73 - 75] or diversity of angles as in optical diffraction tomography [25 , 76 - 78] . Optical sectioning has also been demonstrated using optical scanning holography (OSH) [79 , 80] .
- 4.1. Digital Interference Holography (DIH)
Digital holography, like any general holography methods, reproduces a three-dimensional optical field, but it does not directly provide topographic or tomographic information - i.e., a three-dimensional distribution of scattering centers of the object. To accomplish this, one needs a means to measure the distance to the object points. Optical coherence tomography extracts the distance information by interference of low-coherence light. We have developed digital interference holography (DIH) for synthesizing the low coherence by superposition of many holograms using a range of wavelengths [73] .
Briefly, suppose A(r0) represents the amplitude of the optical field scattered or reflected by an object point at r0, Fig. 9(a). According to Huygens’ principle, each of the object points emits a spherical wavelet, which arrives at the hologram plane to contribute to the hologram formation. The object field at an arbitrary point r is a superposition of these wavelets from all the object points:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
For tomography, the scattering amplitude A(r0) needs to be unraveled from the total field H(r; k). Noting that H(r; k) depends on the wavenumber k, superposition of many H-fields with a range of k results in:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
In practice, a finite number NH of holograms are acquired using a range Δk of wavenumbers at equal intervals ?=Δ k/NH, Fig. 9 (b). Then the resulting tomographic/topographic image has axial resolution z δ = 2 2 / / k π λ λ Δ ? Δ , where 
PPT Slide
Lager Image
(a) Geometry and (b) process of DIH. H: hologram; E: optical field in the object volume; A: object function. Seetext for more details.
and  are the average wavelength and wavelength range, respectively. The maximum axial size of the object that can be imaged unambiguously is Δz =2π /δ k ?λ 2 /δλ
- 4.2. Ophthalmology Imaging
The DIH instrument consists of a Michelson interferometer illuminated by a tunable laser such as a dye laser, together with imaging optics to form an image of the object on the CCD camera. Polarization optics is used to control illumination ratio between the object and reference beams, as well as for minimizing stray reflections from optical surfaces. The images presented here were obtained from an excised human eye supplied to us by the Lions Eye Institute for Transplant & Research of Tampa, FL [81] . The holographic image acquisition and computation of the optical field of the macula sample are carried out for about 50 wavelengths in the range of 560-600 nm. Superposition of images, in the DIH processes described above, reveals the tomographic mapping within the macular tissue, Figure 10 (a), and clearly delineates borders of blood vessel segments. The imaged surface area is 5020×5020 ㎛ 2 with an axial range A=209.75 ㎛. The 3D pixel resolution is x×y×z = 19.6×19.6×4.2 ㎛ 3 The optical thickness between the retinal nerve fiber layer (NFL) and the retinal pigment epithelial layer (RPE) is measured to be about 84 ㎛. Another example is given in Fig. 10 (b), where the optic nerve disk height and slope are measured with precision to be 355.11 ㎛ and 47℃, which are important parameters in clinical ophthalmology. Digital Interference holography (DIH) offers rapid 3D imaging with theoretically higher resolution than OCT, and without the need to reassemble images from scans. Our research has already demonstrated that, in vitro, DIH can measure the dimensions of the scleral ring and provide a definitive answer regarding the size of the optic disk, a clinically important parameter that is not provided by current OCT instruments.
- 4.3. Holographic Biometry
Though it has a long history, fingerprinting continues to develop in many aspects. New developments include small and inexpensive fingerprint capture devices, fast and less expensive computing hardware, and higher authentication rate to meet the needs of many applications. Reliability can be improved in widening application areas and diverse operating environments by increasing the information content of the acquired data through multi-modal imaging, multi-spectral imaging, and three-dimensional imaging. We have studied the feasibility of using digital holography and interferography to acquire two- and three-dimensional fingerprint images [82] . Figure 11 shows latent fingerprint image obtained by holographic phase microscopy. Both the amplitude and phase images clearly display the friction ridge patterns. The sample was prepared simply by pressing a finger onto a clean slide glass and the images are acquired within a few minutes. There appear to be some smudges of the oily film as well. Closer examination of the two images reveal that
PPT Slide
Lager Image
(a) A reconstructed volume of the human macula sample, 5020×5020×210㎛3, together with several x-y and y-z cross sections at the marked x-positions. The 3D pixel resolution is x×y×z = 19.6×19.6×4.2 ㎛3. (b) Another example of volume 1100×1100×280 ㎛3 with resolution 4.3×4.3×5.6 ㎛3.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Latent fingerprint imaging by holographic phase microscopy: (a) amplitude image; (b) phase image, with detail of a small area shown in inset. FOV is 7.94×5.96 mm2. (c) Phase image of days-old sample: FOV is 6.42×6.42 mm2.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
(a) 3D fingerprint volume image data by DIH. The image volumes are (a) 10.4×10.4×0.21mm3 and (b) 4.86×4.86×0.21 mm3.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Topographic imaging of plastic fingerprint by low coherence interferography: (a) an interferogram as captured by camera; (b) a coherent interference envelope extracted by phase shifting method; (c) a two-dimensional map of the fingerprint surface topography, with the gray scale representing the height of the surface at each pixel; (d) a 3D perspective rendering of (c). The image volume is 15×12×0.70mm3.
the phase image has significantly quieter background than the amplitude image. Coherent noise in conventional holograms is a significant issue, but it is much less of a problem in phase images of digital holography. The ridge marks left by the water and oily film of fingerprint is still liquid and appear to have several wavelengths, or microns, of thickness, which is evidenced by wrapped phase discontinuities within many of the ridge lines, as shown in the inset. The phase image from a fingerprint sample prepared in a similar manner but left in open air for several days is also shown. In this case, the watery substance appears to have mostly evaporated, but one can still discern the whorl pattern of residues left behind, a small fraction of a micron thick.
Next we apply the digital interference holography (DIH) for imaging the three-dimensional surface of plastic prints. For example in Fig. 12 , the laser wavelength is scanned over the range 559~599 nm at 50 intervals. The cross-sectional views clearly depict the crests and valleys of the friction ridges, with about 750 ㎛ ridge periodicity and about 50 ㎛ depth of grooves. Notice in Fig. 12 (b) an important level 2 (minutiae) feature called crossover, which is a short ridge that runs between two parallel ridges. The length of the ridge between the end points is 1700 ㎛.
We also present LED-based wide-field optical coherence tomography for imaging of plastic prints on MikrosilTM. Figure 13 (a) is an example of an interferogram with FOV = 15×12 mm, where coherent interference speckles are barely visible. Phase-shifting method extracts a contour section of the surface that is within a coherence length with respect to the reference mirror, as shown in Fig. 13 (b). The object z-position is then scanned over a distance of 700 ㎛ to accumulate the surface contours. This fingerprint sample displays level 1 whorl pattern, as well as many of the level 2 and level 3 features, including the bifurcation, ending, cross-over, and pores.
Manipulation of particles and cells through optical force leads to a new technology to elucidate, interrogate, and model the role of physical forces on varying cellular functions, including metastasis, metastatic potential, or motility [83 - 86] . This is coupled with the capability of digital holography to quantitatively and temporally model, monitor, track, and characterize changes that occur at the cellular level. Marriage of the holographic optical tweezers (HOT) [87] and digital holographic microscopy (DHM) is particularly attractive. DHM provides three-dimensional location and imaging of cells while HOT controls the location and movement. From the fusion, a host of new capabilities are expected to emerge, such as smart tracking and trapping, artificially patterned growth and motion, and automatic control of cellular micromanipulation and microsurgery [88] .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Laser microsurgery of rat kangaroo kidney epithelial (PTK2) cell. (a) Quantitative phase images during surgery.(b) Difference phase images relative to initial image.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Quantitative phase images of RBC cells before and after laser scissors cut.
- 5.1. Laser Microsurgery of Cells
Microscope-based laser scissors uses a focused laser beam to alter and to ablate cellular and tissue samples, as well as intracellular organelles. It has become an important tool for cell biologists for studying the molecular mechanism of complex biological systems. Visualization of transparent microscopic biological specimens such as living cells and their intracellular constituents being manipulated by a laser scissors is difficult using conventional bright-field microscopy. We have combined the laser scissors and off-axis digital holographic microscopy to record quantitative phase images during the process of laser microsurgery. The introduction of quantitative phase imaging with laser scissors makes it possible to evaluate quantitatively the damage or the repair of the cells and organelles in real time [30] .
Figure 14 shows images of rat kangaroo kidney epithelial (PTK2) cells ablated with a laser microbeam, where the laser was targeted at a spot on a chromosome. The top row of images are quantitative phase microscopy images by digital holography, while the second row depicts difference of the phase images relative to the initial state. Evidently, the laser ablation is accompanied by a swelling of the cell, whose quantitative analysis is possible. The cell swelling is about 6.4 ㎛, assuming a refractive index of 1.38 for the cell and 1.33 for the buffer. The swelling dissipates in less than 5 minutes and the cell recovers its original shape. For another example, Fig. 15 shows DHQPM images of red blood cells before and after a laser scissors cut.
- 5.2. Characterization of Optical Pressure and Optical Trapping by Digital Holography
In order to study cellular characteristics, it is important to use techniques that affect the subject as little as possible. Using a focused laser beam to directly trap portions of the cell can lead to problems of overheating as well as unintentional local mechanical property changes due to large refractive index materials being pulled toward the focus. Our approach is to apply optical pressure using a broad wavefront over the surface of the cell without the use of intermediate materials or invasive focus. We then observe and measure the resulting deformation using a Mach-Zehnder configured digital holographic microscope. This provides us with a noninvasive tool to produce quantitative phase images and movies of the cell throughout the process. We can therefore measure the deformation of the cell with nanometric precision enabling the possibility of studying cell mechanical properties using “light-only” manipulation and imaging techniques. Some proof-of-principle experiments have been carried out, whose results are presented below [89 , 90] .
Figure 16 demonstrates the deformation of a liquid interface under optical pressure. The sample material is a suspension of micelles in toluene and silicone grease. Under certain conditions, the toluene and silicone parts separate into distinct phases of different indices of refraction forming an interface with relatively low surface tension. A loosely focused laser impinges on the interface causing a deformation due to momentum transfer according to
PPT Slide
Lager Image
which also shows that the deformation of the interface is always toward the direction of smaller index regardless of the direction of propagation. The data in Fig. 16 indicates
PPT Slide
Lager Image
(a) Deformation of liquid interface under optical pressure as detected by DHQPM for varying optical power 0, 0.44,0.66, 0.88, 1.1 W. (b) Graph of deformation profile (smoothed) for varying optical power.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Calibration of microsphere 3D position measurementby DGH. (b) Calibration of optical trapping force bymechanical relaxation. See text for details.
approximately linear increase in deformation with the incident light power. Deformations as small as 40 nm were readily measured using DHQPM. From such data the surface tension of the interface can be determined.
In another experiment, we have used digital Gabor holography to calibrate a optical trapping system. DH reconstruction followed by 3D low-pass filtering, thresholding, and centroid calculation allowed determination of the 10 ㎛ microsphere’s positions with 50 nm precision in all three directions. Figure 17 (a) displays 3D position measurements while the cover slip, on which the spheres are dry-fixed, is shifted by piezo transducers with 500 nm square wave for horizontal (xy) direction and 1200 nm sine wave for vertical (z) direction. Each panel’s scale is 1500 nm×10 s. In Fig. 17 (b) the motion is 100 nm horizontal and 120 nm vertical, and the scale is 100 nm×10 s.
The system can also be used for calibration of optical trap strength. In Fig. 17 (c), with a microsphere in water trapped in the trapping laser focus, the coverslip containing the water drop is shifted with piezo-driven square wave. The microsphere momentarily shifts with the water medium but relaxes back to the trap focus. Each panel’s scale is 4.0 ㎛×4.0 s. Measurement of the relaxation time can be used to determine the trapping force if the viscosity is known, or vice versa.
This article provided an overview of the digital holographic microscopy and its biomedical applications. Exciting new capabilities are illustrated using examples from the author’s research results, which are a small sampling of impressive progress being made by many researchers throughout the world. Commercial holographic microscopes have been developed. DHM has started attracting serious attention from biomedical researchers. Researchers from many different areas in physics, biology, engineering, are medicine are involved in the research, development, and applications. It is easy to predict that the continuing advances in computer and imaging technologies will only accelerate the development of powerful instruments and wider applications. Hopefully, this article has conveyed some of the progressive energy in this young technology and have whetted the curiosities of more capable students and researchers.
National Science Foundation and Florida High Tech Corridor have provided funding for various projects presented here, which the author gratefully acknowledges. The author thanks the Journal of the Optical Society of Korea and its editor Prof. B. H. Lee for the invitation to write this review paper.
Jueptner W , Schnars U 2005 Digital Holography: Digital Hologram Recording Numerical Reconstruction and Related Techniques Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg Germany
Kim M.K , ed , Yu L.F , ed , Mann C.J , ed , Poon T.C , ed 2006 Digital holography and multi-wavelength interference techniques in Digital Holography and Three Dimensional Display: Principles and Applications Springer USA ed 51 - 72
Gabor D 1948 A new microscope principle Nature 161 777 - 778    DOI : 10.1038/161777a0
Gabor D 1949 Microscopy by reconstructed wavefronts Proc Roy Soc 454 - 487
Leith E.N , Upatnieks J 1963 Wavefront reconstruction with continuous-tone objects J Opt Soc Am 53 1377 - 1381    DOI : 10.1364/JOSA.531377
Knox C 1966 Holographic microscopy as a technique for recording dynamic microscopic subjects Science 153 989 - 990    DOI : 10.1126/science.153.3739.989
Khanna S.M , Tonndorf J 1972 Tympanic membrane vibrations in cats studied by time-averaged holography Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51 1904 - 1920    DOI : 10.1121/1.1913050
Goodman J.W , Lawrence R.W 1967 Digital image formation from electronically detected holograms Appl Phys Lett 11 77 - 79    DOI : 10.1063/1.1755043
Schnars U , Juptner W 1994 Direct recording of holograms by a Ccd target and numerical reconstruction Appl Opt 33 179 - 181    DOI : 10.1364/AO.330179
Grilli S , Ferraro P , De Nicola S , Finizio A , Pierattini G , Meucci R 2001 Whole optical wavefields reconstruction by digital holography Opt Exp 9 294 - 302    DOI : 10.1364/OE.90294
Mann C.J , Yu L.F , Kim M.K 2006 Movies of cellular and sub-cellular motion by digital holographic microscopy Biomed Eng Online 5 10 -    DOI : 10.1186/1475-925X-5-10
Cuche E , Bevilacqua F , Depeursinge C 1999 Digital holography for quantitative phase-contrast imaging Opt Lett 24 291 - 293    DOI : 10.1364/OL.240291
Kuhn J , Charriere F , Colomb T , Cuche E , Montfort F , Emery Y , Marquet P , Depeursinge C 2008 Axial sub-nanometer accuracy in digital holographic microscopy Meas Sci Technol 19 074007 -    DOI : 10.1088/0957-0233/19/7/074007
Ferraro P , De Nicola S , Finizio A , Coppola G , Grilli S , Magro C , Pierattini G 2003 Compensation of the inherent wave front curvature in digital holographic coherent microscopy for quantitative phase-contrast imaging Appl Opt 42 1938 - 1946    DOI : 10.1364/AO.421938
Gass J , Dakoff A , Kim M.K 2003 Phase imaging without 2 pi ambiguity by multiwavelength digital holography Opt Lett 28 1141 - 1143    DOI : 10.1364/OL.281141
Yamaguchi I , Zhang T 1997 Phase-shifting digital holography Opt Lett 22 1268 - 1270    DOI : 10.1364/OL.221268
Dubois F , Requena M.L.N , Minetti C , Monnom O , Istasse E 2004 Partial spatial coherence effects in digital holographic microscopy with a laser source Appl Opt 43 1131 - 1139    DOI : 10.1364/AO.431131
Dubois F , Joannes L , Legros J.C 1999 Improved threedimensional imaging with a digital holography microscope with a source of partial spatial coherence Appl Opt 38 7085 - 7094    DOI : 10.1364/AO.387085
Poon T.C 1985 Scanning holography and two-dimensional image-processing by acoustooptic 2-pupil synthesis J Opt Soc Am A 2 521 - 527    DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.20521
Kim T , Poon T.C 2009 Autofocusing in optical scanning holography Appl Opt 48 H153 - H159    DOI : 10.1364/AO.48H153
Kim T , Poon T.C 2004 Experiments of depth detection and image recovery of a remote target using a complex hologram Opt Eng 43 1851 - 1855    DOI : 10.1117/1.1764574
Poon T.C 2009 Optical scanning holography - a review of recent progress J Opt Soc Korea 13 406 - 415    DOI : 10.3807/JOSK.2009.13.4.406
Mann C.J , Yu L.F , Lo C.M , Kim M.K 2005 Highresolution quantitative phase-contrast microscopy by digital holography Opt Exp 13 8693 - 8698    DOI : 10.1364/OPEX.138693
Colomb T , Kuhn J , Charriere F , Depeursinge C , Marquet P , Marquet N 2006 Total aberrations compensation in digital holographic microscopy with a reference conjugated hologram Opt Exp 14 4300 - 4306    DOI : 10.1364/OE.144300
Debailleul M , Simon B , Georges V , Haeberle O , Lauer V 2008 Holographic microscopy and diffractive microtomography of transparent samples Meas Sci Technol 19 074009 -    DOI : 10.1088/0957-0233/19/7/074009
Rappaz B , Barbul A , Hoffmann A , Boss D , Korenstein R , Depeursinge C , Magistretti P.J , Marquet P 2009 Spatial analysis of erythrocyte membrane fluctuations by digital holographic microscopy Blood Cells Mol Dis 42 228 - 232    DOI : 10.1016/j.bcmd.2009.01.018
Kemper B , Carl D , Schnekenburger J , Bredebusch I , Schafer M , Domschke W , von Bally G 2006 Investigation of living pancreas tumor cells by digital holographic microscopy J Biomed Opt 11 034005 -    DOI : 10.1117/1.2204609
Ligresti A , De Petrocellis L , de la Ossa D.H.P , Aberturas R , Cristino L , Moriello A.S , Finizio A , Gil M.E , Torres A.I , Molpeceres J , Di Marzo V 2010 Exploiting nanotechnologies and TRPV1 channels to investigate theputative anandamide membrane transporter PLoS One 5 e10239 -    DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone10239
Jeong K , Turek J.J , Nolte D.D 2007 Volumetric motilitycontrast imaging of tissue response to cytoskeletal anti-cancer drugs Opt Exp 15 14057 - 14064    DOI : 10.1364/OE.15.014057
Yu L.F , Mohanty S , Zhang J , Genc S , Kim M.K , Berns M.W , Chen Z.P 2009 Digital holographic microscopy for quantitative cell dynamic evaluation during laser microsurgery Opt Exp 17 12031 - 12038    DOI : 10.1364/OE.17.012031
Minetti C , Callens N , Coupier G , Podgorski T , Dubois F 2008 Fast measurements of concentration profiles inside deformable objects in microflows with reduced spatial coherence digital holography Appl Opt 47 5305 - 5314    DOI : 10.1364/AO.475305
Xu W.B , Jericho M.H , Meinertzhagen I.A , Kreuzer H.J 2001 Digital in-line holography for biological applications Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98 11301 - 11305    DOI : 10.1073/pnas.191361398
Sheng J , Malkiel E , Katz J 2006 Digital holographic microscope for measuring three-dimensional particle distributions and motions Appl Opt 45 3893 - 3901    DOI : 10.1364/AO.453893
Owen R.B , Zozulya A.A 2000 In-line digital holographic sensor for monitoring and characterizing marine particulates Opt Eng 39 2187 - 2197    DOI : 10.1117/1.1305542
Garcia-Sucerquia J , Xu W.B , Jericho S.K , Klages P , Jericho M.H , Kreuzer H.J 2006 Digital in-line holographic microscopy Appl Opt 45 836 - 850    DOI : 10.1364/AO.450836
Malkiel E , Sheng I , Katz J , Strickler J.R 2003 The three-dimensional flow field generated by a feeding calanoid copepod measured using digital holography J Exp Biol 206 3657 - 3666    DOI : 10.1242/jeb586
Schedin S , Pedrini G , Tizian H.J 2000 Pulsed digital holography for deformation measurements on biological tissues Appl Opt 39 2853 - 2857    DOI : 10.1364/AO.392853
Moon I , Javidi B 2008 3-D visualization and identification of biological microorganisms using partially temporal incoherent light in-line computational holographic imaging IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27 1782 - 1790    DOI : 10.1109/TMI.2008.927339
Gabor D , Goss W.P 1966 Interference microscope with total wavefront reconstruction J Opt Soc Am 56 849 - 858    DOI : 10.1364/JOSA.560849
Yamaguchi I , Kato J , Ohta S , Mizuno J 2001 Image formation in phase-shifting digital holography and applications to microscopy Appl Opt 40 6177 - 6186    DOI : 10.1364/AO.406177
Stern A , Javidi B 2008 Space-bandwith conditions for efficient phase-shifting digital holographic microscopy J Opt Soc Am A 25 736 - 741    DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.250736
Xu L , Peng X.Y , Guo Z.X , Miao J.M , Asundi A 2005 Imaging analysis of digital holography Opt Exp 13 2444 - 2452    DOI : 10.1364/OPEX.132444
Hennelly B.M , Sheridan J.T 2005 Generalizing optimizing and inventing numerical algorithms for the fractional Fourier Fresnel and linear canonical transforms J Opt Soc Am A 22 917 - 927    DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.220917
Kreis T.M 2002 Frequency analysis of digital holography Opt Eng 41 771 - 778    DOI : 10.1117/1.1458551
Onural L 2000 Sampling of the diffraction field Appl Opt 39 5929 - 5935    DOI : 10.1364/AO.395929
Wagner C , Seebacher S , Osten W , Juptner W 1999 Digital recording and numerical reconstruction of lensless Fourier holograms in optical metrology Appl Opt 38 4812 - 4820    DOI : 10.1364/AO.384812
Goodman J.W 1996 Introduction to Fourier Optics McGraw Hill Boston USA 2nd ed
Li J.C , Tankam P , Peng Z.J , Picart P 2009 Digital holographic reconstruction of large objects using a convolution approach and adjustable magnification Opt Lett 34 572 - 574    DOI : 10.1364/OL.340572
Wang D.Y , Zhao J , Zhang F , Pedrini G , Osten W 2008 High-fidelity numerical realization of multiple-step Fresnel propagation for the reconstruction of digital holograms Appl Opt 47 D12 - D20    DOI : 10.1364/AO.470D12
Yu L.F , Kim M.K 2005 Wavelength-scanning digital interference holography for tomographic three-dimensional imaging by use of the angular spectrum method Opt Lett 30 2092 - 2094    DOI : 10.1364/OL.302092
Jeong S.J , Hong C.K 2008 Pixel-size-maintained image reconstruction of digital holograms on arbitrarily tilted planes by the angular spectrum method Appl Opt 47 3064 - 3071    DOI : 10.1364/AO.473064
Wolf E 1970 Determination of amplitude and phase of scattered fields by holography J Opt Soc Am 60 18 - 20    DOI : 10.1364/JOSA.600018
Onural L 1993 Diffraction from a wavelet point-of-view Opt Lett 18 846 - 848    DOI : 10.1364/OL.180846
Brunel M , Coetmellec S , Lebrun D , Ameur K.A 2009 Digital phase contrast with the fractional Fourier transform Appl Opt 48 579 - 583    DOI : 10.1364/AO.480579
Fu Y , Pedrini G , Hennelly B.M , Groves R.M , Osten W 2009 Dual-wavelength image-plane digital holography for dynamic measurement Opt Lasers Eng 47 552 - 557    DOI : 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.102
Kou S.S , Sheppard C.J.R 2007 Imaging in digital holographic microscopy Opt Exp 15 13640 - 13648    DOI : 10.1364/OE.15.013640
Pavillon N , Seelamantula C.S , Kuhn J , Unser M , Depeursinge C 2009 Suppression of the zero-order term in offaxis digital holography through nonlinear filtering Appl Opt 48 H186 - H195    DOI : 10.1364/AO.48H186
Cho H , Woo J.K , Kim D , Shin S , Yu Y 2009 DC suppression in in-line digital holographic microscopes on the basis of an intensity-averaging method using variable pixel numbers Optics and Laser Technology 41 741 - 745    DOI : 10.1016/j.optlastec.2009.011
Cuche E , Marquet P , Depeursinge C 2000 Spatial filtering for zero-order and twin-image elimination in digital off-axis holography Appl Opt 39 4070 - 4075    DOI : 10.1364/AO.394070
Yu L.F , Kim M.K 2005 Wavelength scanning digital interference holography for variable tomographic scanning Opt Exp 13 5621 - 5627    DOI : 10.1364/OPEX.135621
Yu L.F , Kim M.K 2006 Variable tomographic scanning with wavelength scanning digital interference holography Opt Comm 260 462 - 468    DOI : 10.1016/j.optcom.2005.11.022
Yang Y , Kang B.S , Choo Y.J 2008 Application of the correlation coefficient method for determination of the focal plane to digital particle holography Appl Opt 47 817 - 824    DOI : 10.1364/AO.470817
Dubois F , Schockaert C , Callens N , Yourassowsky C 2006 Focus plane detection criteria in digital holography microscopy by amplitude analysis Opt Exp 14 5895 - 5908    DOI : 10.1364/OE.145895
Yu L.F , Kim M.K 2006 Pixel resolution control in numerical reconstruction of digital holography Opt Lett 31 897 - 899    DOI : 10.1364/OL.310897
Miccio L , Alfieri D , Grilli S , Ferraro P , Finizio A , De Petrocellis L , Nicola S.D 2007 Direct full compensation of the aberrations in quantitative phase microscopy of thin objects by a single digital hologram Appl Phys Lett 90 041104 -    DOI : 10.1063/1.2432287
Shin S , Yu Y 2009 Three-dimensional information and refractive index measurement using a dual-wavelength digital holographic microscope J Opt Soc Korea 13 173 - 177    DOI : 10.3807/JOSK.2009.13.2.173
Warnasooriya N , Kim M 2009 Quantitative phase imaging using three-wavelength optical phase unwrapping J Mod Opt 56 67 - 74    DOI : 10.1080/09500340802450615
Warnasooriya N , Kim M.K 2007 LED-based multi-wavelength phase imaging interference microscopy Opt Exp 15 9239 - 9247    DOI : 10.1364/OE.159239
Liu C , Bae Y.S , Yang W.Z , Kim D.Y 2008 All-inone multifunctional optical microscope with a single holographic measurement Opt Eng 47 087001 -    DOI : 10.1117/1.2968708
Khmaladze A , Restrepo-Martinez A , Kim M , Castaneda R , Blandon A 2008 Simultaneous dual-wavelength reflection digital holography applied to the study of the porous coal samples Appl Opt 47 3203 - 3210    DOI : 10.1364/AO.473203
Ash W.M , Krzewina L.G , Kim M.K 2009 Quantitative imaging of cellular adhesion by total internal reflection holographic microscopy Appl Opt 48 H144 - H152    DOI : 10.1364/AO.48H144
Huang D , Swanson E.A , Lin C.P , Schuman J.S , Stinson W.G , Chang W , Hee M.R , Flotte T , Gregory K , Puliafito C.A , Fujimoto J.G 1991 Optical coherence tomography Science 254 1178 - 1181    DOI : 10.1126/science.1957169
Kim M.K 2000 Tomographic three-dimensional imaging of a biological specimen using wavelength-scanning digital interference holography Opt Exp 7 305 - 310    DOI : 10.1364/OE.70305
You J.W , Kim S , Kim D 2008 High speed volumetric thickness profile measurement based on full-field wavelength scanning interferometer Opt Exp 16 21022 - 21031    DOI : 10.1364/OE.16.021022
Kuhn J , Montfort F , Colomb T , Rappaz B , Moratal C , Pavillon N , Marquet P , Depeursinge C 2009 Submicrometer tomography of cells by multiple-wavelength digital holographic microscopy in reflection Opt Lett 34 653 - 655    DOI : 10.1364/OL.340653
Jeon Y , Hong C.K 2009 Rotation error correction by numerical focus adjustment in tomographic phase microscopy Opt Eng 48 105801 -    DOI : 10.1117/1.3242833
Jeong S.J , Hong C.K 2008 Illumination-angle-scanning digital interference holography for optical section imaging Opt Lett 33 2392 - 2394    DOI : 10.1364/OL.332392
Choi W.S , Fang-Yen C , Badizadegan K , Dasari R.R , Feld M.S 2008 Extended depth of focus in tomographic phase microscopy using a propagation algorithm Opt Lett 33 171 - 173    DOI : 10.1364/OL.330171
Kim T 2006 Optical sectioning by optical scanning holography and a Wiener filter Appl Opt 45 872 - 879    DOI : 10.1364/AO.450872
Indebetouw G , Klysubun P 2000 Imaging through scattering media with depth resolution by use of low-coherence gating in spatiotemporal digital holography Opt Lett 25 212 - 214    DOI : 10.1364/OL.250212
Potcoava M.C , Kim M.K 2008 Optical tomography for biomedical applications by digital interference holography Meas Sci Technol 19 074010 -    DOI : 10.1088/0957-0233/19/7/074010
Potcoava M.C , Kim M.K 2009 Fingerprint biometry applications of digital holography and low-coherence interferography Appl Opt 48 H9 - H15    DOI : 10.1364/AO.4800H9
Ashkin A , Dziedzic J.M 1987 Optical trapping and manipulation of viruses and bacteria Science 235 1517 - 1520    DOI : 10.1126/science.3547653
Ashkin A 1970 Acceleration and trapping of particles by radiation pressure Phys Rev Lett 24 156 - 159    DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevLett.24.156
Kuo S.C 2001 Using optics to measure biological forces and mechanics Traffic 2 757 - 763    DOI : 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2001.21103.x
Berns M.W 1998 Laser scissors and tweezers Scientific American 278 62 - 67
Dufresne E.R , Grier D.G 1998 Optical tweezer arrays and optical substrates created with diffractive optics Review of Scientific Instruments 69 1974 - 1977    DOI : 10.1063/1.1148883
Carnegie D.J , Stevenson D.J , Mazilu M , Gunn-Moore F , Dholakia K 2008 Guided neuronal growth using optical line traps Opt Exp 16 10507 - 10517    DOI : 10.1364/OE.16.010507
Clark D.C , Krzewina L , Kim M.K 2010 Quantitative analysis by digital holography of the effect of optical pressure on a biological cell JMA23 Proc OSA DH Topical Meeting Miami FL USA 2010 JMA23 -
Potcoava M.C , Krzewina L , Kim 2010 Threedimensional tracking of optically trapped particles by digital Gabor holography paper JMA35 Proc OSA DH Miami FL USA 2010 JMA35 -