Advanced
Survey of Inositol in Infant Formula
Survey of Inositol in Infant Formula
Mass Spectrometry Letters. 2016. Mar, 7(1): 12-15
Copyright © 2016, Korean Society Mass Spectrometry
All MS Letters content is Open Access, meaning it is accessible online to everyone, without fee and authors’ permission. All MS Letters content is published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org /licenses/by/3.0/). Under this license, authors reserve the copyright for their content; however, they permit anyone to unrestrictedly use, distribute, and reproduce the content in any medium as far as the original authors and source are cited. For any reuse, redistribution, or reproduction of a work, users must clarify the license terms under which the work was produced.
  • Received : November 12, 2015
  • Accepted : December 21, 2015
  • Published : March 31, 2016
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
A., Patel
M., Ditiatkovski
L., Kennedy
A., Oglobline
N., Choi
G., Richardson
grichardson@dtsfoodlabs.com.au

Abstract
Results of free and bound myo -inositol in infant formula (IF) are presented. Inositol was analyzed by HILIC ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometer. The levels of free myo -inositol in 27 Australian and 4 EU originated IF samples were 300-600 mg/kg of powder or 1.6-3.1 mg/100 kJ. The amount of bound inositol in lipid fraction of IF was, on average, 10% of free myo -inositol.
Keywords
Introduction
Inositol is an important nutrient present naturally in human milk and cow’s milk but in a lesser quantity. It exists predominantly in the free myo -inositol form. myo -Inositol is found in large amounts in plant materials such as soy beans but is in the bound form, predominantly as polyphosphate and in a lesser extent as phosphatidylinositol.
The levels of inositol in infant formula are regulated. CODEX 1 defines lower and upper levels of inositol at 1 and 9.5 mg/100 kJ. In the USA there is no prescribed limits 2 for inositol in dairy-based IF. The minimum amount of inositol in non-dairy based IF according to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is 4 mg/100 kcal (~1 mg/100 kJ) and the upper limit is not regulated. The levels of inositol in IF in Australia and New Zealand are regulated by the FSANZ 2.9.1 and in China by the GB 10765-2010 Food Standards, Table 1 .
Chemical identity and regulatory limits of inositol
PPT Slide
Lager Image
a Identical in Australia, China and New Zealand
There are nine isomers of inositol C 6 H 12 O 6 with the myo -inositol form being the most abundant and physiologically relevant. The structures of the inositol isomers are presented in the Fig. 1 . There is limited data on inositol levels in dairy products. The most substantial survey was done in Japan 3 . The content of total myo -inositol in human milk was reported as 32.7±15.2 in colostrum, 17.8±1.9 in transitional milk, and 14.9±3.1 mg/100 mL in mature milk. In cow’s milk, it was 10.6±1.0, 7.0±1.1, and 4.1±1.0 mg/100 mL, respectively. Levels of lipid bound myo -inositol in human and cow’s milk were 0.22±0.09 and 0.36±0.10 mg/100 mL, respectively. A small amount of scyllo -inositol was found in both human and cow's milk, while D-chiro -inositol was not found in either. The percent of lipid bound to total myo -inositol in cow’s milk reported was 6.3±1.3%.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Nine isomeric forms of inositol.
There are several testing methods for inositol - GC/FID 4 , 5 LC 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 anion exchange chromatography 10 and microbiological. 11 , 12 The performance requirements set by the Association of Analytical Communities (AOAC International) with respect to inositol methods describe the determination of the free myo -inositol and phosphatidylinositol, but exclude methyl ethers, glycosides, phosphorylated forms and phytate in all forms of infant, adult, and/or pediatric formula (powders, ready-to-feed liquids, and liquid concentrates). In this report we present results of a LCMSMS method for the determination of free and bound myo -inositol in Australia- and EU-originated commercial IF samples.
Experimental
- Instruments and Reagents
All reagents were of analytical grade unless otherwise specified. Solvents and reagents for UPLC mobile phases were of LCMS grade. Water for UPLC mobile phases was with TOC <2 ppb and resistivity > 16MΩ·cm, double purified on Integra , Siemens of Barsbüttel, Germany from institute water produced by Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA. Acetonitrile and methanol were from Fisher Scientific and the hydrochloric acid was from Merck KGaA of Darmstadt, Germany. The reference material of myo -inositol cat. No. I5125-50G was from Sigma-Aldrich of St. Louis, MO, USA. myo -Inositol-D 6 was from TRC Toronto, Canada.
The Acquity H -class UPLC instrument coupled with Xevo TQ MS mass spectrometer were from Waters of Milford, MA, USA. The chromatographic column used was Acquity UPLC BEH Amide, 2.1 mm × 100 mm × 1.7 μm also from Waters.
- Analytical procedure
Dairy-based IF dry powder products were purchased from different retail outlets of the metropolitan Melbourne during June-August 2014. Before analysis samples were stored according to the label requirements. Free and bound inositols were extracted according to AOAC official methods 2012.12 13 and bound inositols were hydrolyzed to the free form according to 2011.18. 14 Both AOAC protocols were followed precisely in order to have consistency with data of other laboratories. Extracts were analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS. myo -inositol-D 6 (100 μL, 5.0 μg/mL) was added to 200 μL of the filtered sample which was further diluted with 1.7 mL of acetonitrile to facilitate HILIC separation. The injection volume was 10 μL. The analytical system was calibrated from 0.25 to 5 ppm using six standards in solvent. Table 2 shows the UPLC gradient used.
UPLC Gradient
PPT Slide
Lager Image
UPLC Gradient
Quality assurance and quality control was performed by analysis of reagent blanks, duplicate samples and SRM 1849a, NIST USA.
Results and discussion
The extraction of free and bound inositol was based on official AOAC procedures, and the LCMS determination was developed and validated in-house based on publications of J.-H. Ahn 15 et al. and K.-Y. Leung 16 et al. The run time of the chromatographic separation is 8 min, Fig. 2 .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Chromatograms of the dairy-based IF extract, tR of inositol is 4.29 min. Top spectrum is quantitative peak, middle is qualitative peak and bottom is internal standard reference.
Reference material, SRM1849a with stated myo -inositol level of 405.2 ±7.6 mg/kg was repetitively analyzed to determine accuracy and precision of the assay, the results are listed in Table 3 .
Results ofmyo-inositol in SRM1849a analyzed on 7 separate occasions
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Results of myo-inositol in SRM1849a analyzed on 7 separate occasions
Table 4 shows the result of the survey. The results showed a mean value of 43.5 mg/100 g for Australian IF, excluding one outlier (IF21). Thermo 17 recently published brief results and method. The microbiological and liquid chromatography methods of total inositol determination have been compared during analysis of dietetic milk powders. Several authors reported systematically higher concentrations of total inositol determined by the LC/PAD technique (420 to 1340 mg/kg) than by the microbiological procedure (270 to 1120 mg/kg). The difference between values given by two methods is significant considering mild extraction conditions applied for free inositol determination of both methods. To the contrary, Indyk and Woollard reported 18 similar amounts of free inositol in skimmed milk powders, whole-milk powders and milk infant formulas determined by HPLC and microbiological procedures. Soy beans are known to contain up to 0.9 % of pinitol, a methylated form of D-chiro -inositol that may be separated 19 , 20 from D-chiro - and myo -inositol by gas chromatography. The high fraction of free to total inositol in samples of soya bean meal determined by the chromatographic procedure was not confirmed in the microbiological assay. These findings suggest a stereo selectivity of the latter. Pinitol and D-chiro -inositol, the predominant inositols of soya bean husk, most probably coeluted from the analytical column with myo -inositol while microbiological assay determined only the myo -inositol. The use of the better chromatographic resolution of UPLC and selectivity of mass spectrometry is critical to reducing these errors.
Content of inositol in IF samples, SD is indicated for n=2.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
* - SD calculated for n=7; ** - full cream UHT milk.
Following the protocols of NATA’s Technical Note 33, 21 the MU for myo -inositol results was determined to be 25 mg/kg (7.7%) at the levels present in infant formula. The inositol of lipid fraction was found to be about 10% of the total myo -inositol content.
Conclusions
A UPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the analysis of free myo -inositol which was single-laboratory validated and used for the survey of dairy-based IF samples originated in Australia and EU. The mean±SD of free myo -inositol of 27 IF samples originated in Australia was 43.5±3.6 mg/100 g (excluding one outlier) in dry powders.
- Abbreviations
  • CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
  • FSANZ - Food Standards Australian and New Zealand
  • GB - Guobiao, Chinese National Standard
  • NATA - National Association of Testing Authorities
  • PAD - Pulse Amperometric Detector
  • SRM - Standard Reference Material
  • UHT - Ultra Heat Treated
  • EU - European Union
Acknowledgements
Authors would like to thank Dr. Simone Rochfort and her group from the DEPI, Vic. for the valuable discussions during the project.
References
Standard For Infant Formula And Formulas For Special Medical Purposes Intended For Infants. CODEX STEN 72-1981, rev 2011
2000 21CFR107.100. Chapter I. Food and Drug Administration, Department Of Health and Human Services USA
Ogasa K. , Kuboyama M. , Kiyosawa I. , Suzuki T. , Itoh M. 1975 J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 21 129 -    DOI : 10.3177/jnsv.21.129
Koning A. J. 1994 Analyst 119 1319 -    DOI : 10.1039/an9941901319
March J. G. , Forteza R. , Grases F. 1996 Chromatographia 42 329 -    DOI : 10.1007/BF02290319
Lauro P. N. , Craven P. A. , DeRubertis F. R. 1989 Anal. Biochem. 178 331 -    DOI : 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90648-9
Katayama M. , Matsuda Y. , Kobayashi K. , Kaneko S. , Ishikawa H. 2006 Biomed. Chromatogr. 20 440 -    DOI : 10.1002/bmc.578
Perell J. , Isern B. , Costa-Bauz A. , Grases F. 2004 J. Chromatogr. B 802 367 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.jchromb.2003.12.005
Flores M. I. A. , Moreno J. L. F. , Frenich A. G. , Vidal J. L. M. 2011 Food Chem. 129 1281 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.05.045
Tagliaferri E. G. , Bonetti G. , Blake C. J. 2000 J. Chromatogr. A 879 129 -    DOI : 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00323-X
Kouzuma T. , Takahashi M. , Endoh T. , Kaneko R. , Ura N. , Shimamoto K. , Watanabe N. 2001 Clin. Chim. Acta 312 143 -    DOI : 10.1016/S0009-8981(01)00614-3
Ashizawa N. , Yoshida M. , Aotsuka T. 2000 J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 44 89 -    DOI : 10.1016/S0165-022X(00)00069-5
Free and Total Myo-Inositol in Infant Formula and Adult/Pediatric Nutritional Formula. AOAC Official Method 2012.12.
Myo-Inositol (Free and Bound as Phosphatidylinositol) in Infant Formula and Adult Nutritionals. AOAC Official Method 2011.18.
Ahn J. H. , Lee M. S. , Kwak B. M. , Park J. S. , Park J. M. , Kim J. M. China-Japan-Korea Symposium on Analytical Chemistry Fukuoka and Nagasaki (Japan) 22-25 August 2013 PL25 -
Leung K. Y. , Mills K. , Burren K. A. , Andrew J. 2011 J. Chromatogr. B 879 2759 -    DOI : 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.07.043
Chen L. , Borba B. , Rohrer J 2014 Determination of Myo-Inositol (Free and Bound as Phosphatidylinositol) in Infant Formula and Adult Nutritionals. Thermo Fisher Scientific Application note 1083
Indyk H. E. , Woollard D. C. 1994 Analyst 119 397 -    DOI : 10.1039/an9941900397
Lee Y. K. , Park P. B. , Park Y. I. , Chung N. 2003 Agr. Chem. Biotechnol. 46 148 -
Gomes C. I. , Obendorf R. L. , Horbowicz M. 2005 Crop Sci. 45 1312 -    DOI : 10.2135/cropsci2004.0247
2013 Guidelines for estimating and reporting measurement uncertainty of chemical test results. NATA Australia Technical Note 33