Comparison of Airborne Bacterial Communities from a Hog Farm and Spray Field
Comparison of Airborne Bacterial Communities from a Hog Farm and Spray Field
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2015. May, 25(5): 709-717
Copyright © 2015, The Korean Society For Microbiology And Biotechnology
  • Received : August 04, 2014
  • Accepted : November 18, 2014
  • Published : May 28, 2015
Export by style
Cited by
About the Authors
Ann M., Arfken
Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences, Gloucester Point, VA, 23062, USA
Bongkeun, Song
Department of Life Science, Dongguk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Jung-Suk, Sung
Department of Life Science, Dongguk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Airborne bacteria from hog farms may have detrimental impacts on human health, particularly in terms of antibiotic resistance and pathogen zoonosis. Despite human health risks, very little is known about the composition and diversity of airborne bacteria from hog farms and hog-related spray fields. We used pyrosequencing analysis of 16S rRNA genes to compare airborne bacterial communities in a North Carolina hog farm and lagoon spray field. In addition, we isolated and identified antibiotic-resistant bacteria from both air samples. Based on 16S rRNA gene pyrosequence analysis, Actinobacteria , Bacteroidetes , Firmicutes , and Proteobacteria were the dominant phyla in airborne bacterial communities from both hog farm and spray field sites. Within the Firmicutes genera, Clostridium spp. were more abundant in the hog farm, whereas Staphylococcus spp. were higher in the spray field. The presence of opportunitic pathogens, including several Staphylococcus species and Propionibacterium acnes , was detected in both bioaerosol communities based on phylogenetic analysis. The isolation and identification of antibiotic-resistant bacteria from air samples also showed similar results with dominance of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria in both hog farm and spray field air. Thus, the existence of opportunistic pathogens and antibiotic resistant bacteria in airborne communities evidences potential health risks to farmers and other residents from swine bioaerosol exposure.
In order to keep up with population increases and livestock demands, concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) have become the predominant method for animal production. By concentrating large numbers of animals in confined spaces, there is an increased potential of zoonotic disease and disease transfer [27] . To prevent disease and promote growth, subtherapeutic doses of broad-spectrum antibiotics are routinely administered at continuous lowlevel doses in animal agriculture [46] . Of particular concern is the swine industry, with an estimated 10.3 million pounds of non-therapeutic antibiotics used annually [24] . Many studies have shown that this sustained, low-level antibiotic use for non-therapeutic purposes selects for high-level resistance to antibiotics in commensal and pathogenic bacteria in swine [1 , 2 , 5 , 10 , 30 , 45] .
One route of transmission for antibiotic-resistant bacteria and disease from CAFOs to humans may be through bioaerosols. Antibiotics used in swine CAFOs may be dispersed through the air [10 , 26] from both feed and manure dust [11] as well as spray field application of the waste. Swine waste is commonly disposed of by spreading or spraying effluent over agricultural fields [11] , which may generate bioaerosols capable of being transmitted through the air [35] . Gibbs et al . [26] found antibiotic-resistant bacteria inside and up to 150 m downwind of a swine facility to be nearly three times that of the upwind site. Swine workers and members of the community living near CAFOs may be directly exposed to antibiotic-resistant bacteria by inhaling the air from hog farming operations [10] . In addition to antibiotic resistance, bioaerosols from CAFOs may cause other adverse human health effects [13 , 14 , 49] . Zoonotic pathogens, including Clostridium difficile , Staphylococcus aureus , and Streptococcus suis [41] , may transmit to humans via direct contact with live animals or bioaerosol exposure. Potential pathogenic bacteria and high levels of mold, yeasts, and bacteria have all been detected in the air of swine CAFOs [13 , 15 , 16 , 29 , 37] . Neighbors of swine CAFOs have been shown to have higher incidences of excessive coughing, headaches, sore throats, and diarrhea [47] , and swine confinement workers have reported greater incidences of asthma and bronchitis [20 , 28 , 43 , 49] than individuals not associated with swine CAFOs.
Despite the potential impacts on human health and the spread of antibiotic resistance by bioaerosols, much is still unknown regarding the composition and diversity of airborne bacteria from swine CAFOs. Previous studies regarding swine-related bioaerosols have mainly relied on culturedependent methods to detect and enumerate bacteria present in the air [16 , 21] . A more recent study of airborne bacteria in a swine confinement building by Nehme et al . [36] demonstrated through the use of quantitative PCR of eubacterial 16S rRNA genes that airborne bacteria were 100 to 1,000 times greater than total culturable bacteria. Pyrosequencing analysis of bioaerosol communities in swine confinement buildings revealed a predominance of Firmicutes , with the presence of Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. [29] . However, very few studies have examined the presence of combined zoonotic pathogens and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in bioaerosols of hog farms and spray fields. In this study, we conducted pyrosequencing analysis of 16S rRNA genes to detect the presence of potential zoonotic pathogens in airborne bacterial communities of a North Carolina hog farm and spray field. In addition, antibiotic-resistant airborne bacteria were cultivated and identified to determine if potential pathogens also exhibited antibiotic resistance.
Materials and Methods
- Pyrosequencing Analysis of Airborne Bacterial Communities from a Hog Farm and Spray Field
Bioaerosol samplings were conducted at two locations: (1) a hog farm and (2) an adjacent, recently sprayed field located in Burgaw, North Carolina ( Fig. 1 ). The hog farm site was located next to a hog lagoon and approximately 5 m away from a hog house. The spray field sample site was located approximately 300 m from the sampled hog farm and sprayed with hog lagoon waste 24 h prior to sampling. Metrological conditions during the day of sampling were obtained from the North Carolina Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the Southeast Database ( ). The temperature was 87℃ with a relative humidity of 42%, and the wind direction was from the Southeast (138°) with a wind speed of 8.1 mph.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Location of hog farm and spray field bioaerosol and air isolate sample collections.
Duplicate samplings at each site were conducted 2 m above ground level. Air from the hog farm or spray field site was vacuumed for 10 min through a 0 22 µm nitrocellulose filter (45 mm diameter; PALL Corporation, New York, NY, USA) using a Gast vacuum pump (Sterilich, Kent, WA, USA) with a flow rate of 34 liters per minute. The filters were stored at -20℃ prior to DNA extraction. DNA extraction using the PowerSoil DNA Kit (Mo-bio Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) was conducted on half filters from each sample, following the manufacturer’s protocol. All samples were disrupted using Thermo Savant Fast Prep FP 120 Cell Disrupter (Qbiogene Inc. Carlsbad CA, USA). The concentration of DNA was quantified using the Qubit DNA quantitation assay (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. A total of 6.9 and 5.1 ng of DNA were obtained from the hog farm and spray field filters, respectively. Triplicate PCRs (20 µl volume) were conducted for each sample with 1. 5 ng of DNA template and primers 27F and 338R [3] , which were modified to include an 8 bp barcode (reverse primers) and adapter sequence for the 454 Genomic Sequencer Junior (454 Life Sciences, Branford, CT, USA). PCRs were carried out using Phusion taq (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). The PCR cycle was as follows: 95℃ for 10 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95℃ for 30 sec, annealing at 55℃ for 1 min, and extension at 72℃ for 1 min. The PCR products were run on 1.0% agarose using gel electrophoresis and gene cleaned following the protocol for the UltraClean GelSpin DNA Purification Kit (Mo-Bio, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The purified amplicons were used as templates for 454 pyrosequencing following the manufacturer’s instruction.
- Bioinformatics and Phylogenetic Analyses
Raw sequences were initially demultiplexed using the Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) package [9] to select for high-quality sequences and to assign the selected sequences to two bins based on barcode sequences. Binned sequences were then denoised using Acacia [7] , followed by chimera removal using USEARCH 6.0 [22] . After initial processing, Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) for each sequence library were determined based on sequence similarity with a minimum coverage of 99% and a minimum identity of 97% using QIIME [9] . A representative sequence from each OTU was selected and used for taxonomic identification by comparing the sequences in the Greengenes database [19] . Species richness and diversity of the two bioaerosol communities were calculated using the taxonomic assignments. Sequence coverage was calculated using Good’s Coverage Estimator. The relative abundance of each genus was calculated by dividing the number of assigned sequences in each genus by the total number of sequences. Genera with more than 1% relative abundance were considered as dominant taxa in the two bioaerosol communities.
Among the dominant taxa, the sequences assigned to the genera of Clostridium , Propionibacterium , and Staphylococcus were selected for phylogenetic analysis to identify the presence of potential zoonotic pathogens. MEGA (ver. 6.0; ; [42] ) was used to align OTU reference sequences with reference 16S rRNA sequences found in the GenBank database ( http:// ). The neighbor-joining method [40] with the Kimura 2-parameter [32] was used to construct a phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA genes. Bootstrap analysis [23] of 1,000 repetitions was used to estimate the reliability of the phylogenetic reconstruction with a 50% support threshold.
- Cultivation and Identification of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria
Exposure to antibiotic plates for airborne bacterial sampling was conducted at the same two locations where bioaerosol sampling was performed: (1) hog farm and (2) spray field ( Fig. 1 ). At each site, duplicate Luria-Bertani plates containing 100 mg/ml of kanamycin (LBK) and commercial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) plates containing oxacillin (Bacto) were exposed to the air for 10 min. The number of bacteria resistant to kanamycin or oxacillin was counted after 48 h incubation at 37℃.
Thirty-seven isolates resistant to either oxacillin or kanamycin were randomly selected and grown in LB broth for 24 h at 37℃. Direct amplification of 16S rRNA genes was conducted using GoTaq (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) master mix with universal 16S rRNA gene primers 27F and 685R [3] using the PCR cycle described above. The PCR products were directly sequenced using 685R primer with Big Dye Terminator v1.1 following the manufacturer’s instruction (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad CA, USA). Taxonomic identification of 16S rRNA sequences was achieved based on a BLAST search at the National Center for Biotechnology Information database ( ). Sequences obtained from this study were deposited under the accession numbers SRR1460715 and KM067995 to KM068031.
- Comparison of Composition and Diversity of Airborne Bacteria in a Hog Farm and Spray Field
A total of 3,667 16S rRNA high-quality, cleaned, and trimmed sequences was obtained from the hog farm air (2,364) and spray field air (1,522) ( Table 1 ). Based on 97% sequence identity, 441 and 379 OTUs were found in the bioaerosol communities of hog farm and spray field, respectively. Higher richness of airborne bacterial community was found in the hog farm air samples, but diversity was higher in the spray field air samples ( Table 1 ). The hog farm bioaerosol community was composed of 16 different phyla, whereas 17 phyla were present in the spray field community ( Fig. 2 ). Proteobacteria was the predominant phylum with 48.3% and 35.3% of percent abundance in the bioaerosol communities of the hog farm and spray field, respectively. Actinobacteria was the second most abundant phylum, representing 15.7% abundance in hog farm air and 18.8% in spray field air. Bacteroidetes accounted for 14.3% of the sequences in the hog farm air and 8.7% of the sequences found in spray field air, whereas Firmicutes accounted for 10.4% and 11.6% of airborne communities in the hog farm and spray field, respectively.
Comparison of richness, diversity, and coverage of airborne bacterial communities.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
aOTUs were determined with 97% sequence similarity cutoff.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Airborne bacterial community profile of phyla identified in hog farm and spray field bioaerosols.
Combined, both bioaerosol communities had a total of 17 dominant bacterial taxa at the genus level, based on more than 1% of relative abundance in the 16S rRNA gene pyrosequences ( Fig. 3 ). Cornybacterium , Microbacterium , Propionibacterium , and Rhodococcus were the dominant genera of Actinobacteria , whereas dominant genera of the Bacteroidetes phylum consisted of Dyadobacter , Flavobacterim , Hymenobacter , Pedobacter , and Prevotella . Four genera, Limonohabitans , Methylobacterium , Pseudomonas , and Sphingomonas , were dominant taxa in the Proteobacteria phylum. Alicyclobacillus , Clostridium , and Staphylococcus were the dominant genera of phylum Firmicutes , with Clostridium spp. being more abundant in the hog farm air and Staphylococcus spp. higher in the spray field air ( Fig. 3 ). Of all the genera represented, the most abundant genus in hog farm bioaerosols was Sphingomonas , whereas Propionibacterium was the most dominant taxa in spray field bioaerosols
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Comparison of dominant genera between two bioaerosol communities. Dominant genera were defined as genera having a 1.0% or greater relative abundance, based on total number of sequences.
- Phylogenetic Analysis ofClostridiumspp.,Propionibacteriumspp., andStaphylococcusspp. in Bioaerosol Communities
Among the dominant genera, Clostridium and Staphylococcus are known to contain two potential zoonotic pathogens, C. difficile and S. aureus , respectively [41] . Phylogenetic analysis was conducted with the dereplicated bioaerosol sequences assigned to these two genera ( Fig. 4 ). Most sequences of Clostridium spp. in the hog farm and spray field bioaerosols were closely related to C. butyricum and C. disporicum , whereas only one hog farm sequence was most closely related to C. chartatabidum ( Fig. 4 ). None of the sequences shared more than 97% sequence identity with C. difficile . Airborne Staphylococcus spp. in common between the hog farm and spray field were identified or closely related to S. hominis and S. saccharolyticus ( Fig. 4 ). Individually, in hog farm air bioaerosols, the presence of S. cohnii and S. warneri was detected, whereas in the spray field bioaerosols, S. auricularis and S. epidermidis were found. None of the sequences identified were closely related to S. aureus .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship between 16S rRNA OTU representative gene sequences derived from hog farm and spray field bioaerosols and GenBank reference sequences from genera Clostridium, Propionibacterium, and Staphylococcus. Bioaerosol OTU representative sequences are based on 97% identity, and numbers following the OTU indicate the number of corresponding sequences.
The sequences assigned to the genus Propionibacterium were also included in the phylogenetic analysis to idenitify the presence of P. acnes , an opportunistic human pathogen. Both bioaerosol communities contained sequences closely related to P. acnes ( Fig. 4 ). A total of 105 sequences in the spray field air and 20 sequences in hog farm air were closely related to P. acnes .
- Enumeration and Identification of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria
Both the oxacillin and kanamycin plates exposed to hog farm air had greater than 300 colonies. The kanamycin plate exposed to spray field air had greater than 300 colonies, whereas the oxacillin plate had 25 colonies. Randomly selected 37 isolates were taxonomically classified based on 16S rRNA sequence analysis ( Table 2 ). All of the isolates were identified within the dominant phyla Actinobacteria , Firmicutes , Bacteroidetes , and Proteobacteria . The majority of isolates, 10 each from the hog farm and spray field, were assigned to phylum Proteobacteria . All of the proteobacterial isolates in hog farm bioaerosols were Pantoea spp., whereas the proteobacterial isolates of spray field bioaerosols were identified to be Cronobacter spp., Halomonas spp., Pantoea spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Sphingobacterium spp. A total of 15 isolates (8 from the hog farm and 7 from the spray field) belonged to phylum Actinobacteria . Corynebacterium spp. were the dominant actinobacterial isolates in the hog farm air, but six different genera were found in the spray field bioaerosols. Only one Staphylococcus isolate in the Firmicutes phylum was found in the hog farm, whereas one Chryseobacterium spp. in Bacteroidetes was isolated from the spray field air sample. Comparing 16S rRNA pyrosequences and antibiotic-resistant isolates, the members of phyla Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were the predominant airborne bacterial communities found in both hog farm and spray field air ( Fig. 2 and Table 2 ).
Taxonomic identification of antibiotic-resistant bacterial isolates.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Taxonomic identification of antibiotic-resistant bacterial isolates.
The airborne bacterial communities ( Fig. 2 ) and antibiotic isolates of both the hog farm and spray field were somewhat similar in composition, with Proteobacteria , Actinobacteria, Bacteroides , and Firmicutes being among the most abundant taxa in both communities, suggesting a similar origin of bioaerosols. These results are comparable to other bioaerosol studies that have found Proteobacteria , Actinobacteria, Bacteroides , and Firmicutes to be abundant in bioaersol samples [29 , 38] . However, the findings from our study were not consistent with other bioaerosol studies involving swine farms in which gut-related bacteria from phylum Firmicutes were dominant [29 , 36] . Less than 14% of the bioaerosol pyrosequences from the hog farm or spray field ( Fig. 2 ) and only one isolate from the spray field were grouped within phylum Firmicutes . The differences in dominance between Firmicutes and other taxa among the air samples may be due to different locations of bioaerosol sampling. The samples for this study were collected outdoors, whereas Nehme et al . [36] and Hong et al . [29] collected air samples within swine confinement buildings. Bioaerosols closely associated with gut bacteria may be highly concentrated within swine buildings but become quickly diluted or dispersed upon contact with open air. In addition, factors such as temperature and seasonality may influence different bacterial dominance [25] . A study conducted by Ravva et al . [38] showed that bioaerosol communities from two different dairies varied widely in terms of relative abundance of communities, based on environmental conditions and wind direction. Despite both dairies producing a large amount of manure, one bioaerosol communitiy was dominated by Firmicutes and the other by Proteobacteria [38] .
In addition to several similarities, there were also some distinct differences in bioaerosol communities and antibiotic-resistant isolates between the hog farm and spray field locations. Sphingomonas sequences were more abundant within the hog farm bioaerosol communties, whereas Propionibacterium sequences were more abundant in the spray field ( Fig. 3 ). Sphingomonas spp. may be a predominant member of swine bioaerosol [12] and Propionibacterium spp., specifically sequences closely related to P. acnes found in this study, have been found to be ubiquitous in outdoor bioaerosols [18] . Among the antibiotic-resistant isolates unique to each environment, Corynebacterium was the most isolated bacteria from hog farm air, and Pseudomonas was the most isolated bacteria from spray field air. These differences in community structure and antibiotic isolates suggest that there are different bacterial origins to the bioaersol communities at each location in addition to an overall general community. These unique communities may be affected by physical factors such as wind direction and dispersal patterns.
With regard to human health, Staphylococcus and Clostridium are two genera of bacteria that contain potential zoonotic pathogens [41] . Within the genus Staphylococcus , most species are generally believed to be ubiquitous in bioaerosol samples of minimally impacted environments, such as offices and nursing homes [39] , but have also been described from clone libraries obtained from pig gastrointestinal tracts [33] and may indicate pig origin. Among the related Staphylococcus bioaerosol sequences found in the hog farm and spray field bioaerosol communities, S. auricularis , S. cohnii , S. epidermidis , S. hominis , S. warneri , and S. saccharolyticus are all considered to be potential opportunistic pathogens associated with human or animal skin flora ( Fig. 4 ). In addition, one antibiotic isolate from the hog farm air identified with the potential opportunistic pathogen Staphylococcus epidermis ( Table 2 ).
In contrast to Staphylococcus, Clostridum spp. in bioaerosols are commonly associated with fecal matter [12 , 36] and are abundant in pig bioaerosols [29] . The majority of uncultured Clostridium sequences and those related to C. disporicum and C. butyricum were similar between hog farm and spray field communities ( Fig. 4 ). Both C. disporicum and C. butyricum have been found to be major phylotypes in liquid swine manure [34] . Only one sequence, related to C. chartatabidum , isolated from rumen contents [31] , was unique to hog farm sequences. In addition to zoonotic pathogens, sequences closely related to the human opportunistic pathogen P. acnes [8] were found in this study. However, P. acnes is commonly found on human skin [44] and is ubiquitous in air samples from different environments [18] , suggesting that the presence of this bacterium in our air samples does not necessarily indicate hog farm origin.
The transmission of airborne, antibiotic-resistant pathogens is also of significant concern regarding human health. Airborne antibiotic-resistant bacteria from CAFOs may be a mediator of dispersing antibiotic resistance to surrounding environments and capable of transmitting antibiotic resistance to other human disease-causing pathogenic bacteria. Of the antibiotic-resistant bacteria isolated from hog farm and spray field air, none of the isolates from this study were known to be obligate or zoonotic pathogens. However, some of the isolates, in addition to S. epidermis described above, may be considered to be opportunistic human pathogens, such as P. agglomerans [17] isolated from both hog farm and spray field air. A broader and more in-depth airborne study would need to be conducted in order to assess the overall health risks from antibiotic-resistant pathogens in hog farm and spray field bioaerosols.
This research was supported by a US Department of Agriculture grant (2014-67019-21614), the UNCW Cahill Award, and the North Carolina Pork Council, as well as IPET Technology Commercialization Support Program (812001-3) of Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Korea. We thank Dr. Lawrence Cahoon for his assistance in sampling North Carolina hog lagoon and spray field bioaerosols.
Aarestrup FM , Agerso Y , Gerner-Smidt P , Madsen M , Jensen LB 2000 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and resistance genes inEnterococcus faecalisandEnterococcus faeciumfrom humans in the community, broilers, and pigs in Denmark. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 37 127 - 137    DOI : 10.1016/S0732-8893(00)00130-9
Aarestrup FM , Kruse H , Tast E , Hammerum AM , Jensen LB 2000 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance amongEnterococcus faeciumfrom broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway. Microb. Drug Resist. 6 63 - 70    DOI : 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63
Amann RI , Ludwig W , Schleifer K-H 1995 Phylogenetic identification andin situdetection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 59 143 - 169
Angenent LT , Kelley ST , Amand A , Pace NR , Hernandez MT 2005 Molecular identification of potential pathogens in water and air of hospital therapy pool. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 4860 - 4865    DOI : 10.1073/pnas.0501235102
Bager F , Madsen M , Christensen J , Aarestrup FM 1997 Avoparcin used as a growth promoter is associated with the occurrence of vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faeciumon Danish poultry and pig farms. Prev. Vet. Med. 31 95 - 112    DOI : 10.1016/S0167-5877(96)01119-1
Bowers RM , McLetchie S , Knight R , Fierer N 2011 Spatial variability in airborne bacterial communities across land-use types and their relationship to the bacterial communities of potential source environments. ISME J. 5 601 - 612    DOI : 10.1038/ismej.2010.167
Bragg L , Stone G , Imelfort M , Hugenholtz P , Tyson GW 2012 Fast, accurate error-correction of amplicon pyrosequences using Acacia. Nat. Methods 9 425 - 426    DOI : 10.1038/nmeth.1990
Bruggemann H , Henne A , Holster F , Liesegang H , Wiezer A , Strittmatter A 2004 The complete genome sequence ofPropionibacterium acnes, a commensal of human skin. Science 305 671 - 673    DOI : 10.1126/science.1100330
Capiraso JG , Kuczynski J , Stombaugh J , Bittinger K , Bushman FD , Costello EK QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7 335 - 336    DOI : 10.1038/nmeth.f.303
Chapin A , Rule A , Gibson K , Buckley T , Schwab K 2005 Airborne multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from a concentrated swine feeding operation. Environ. Health Perspect. 113 137 - 141
Chee-Sanford JC , Mackie RI , Koike S , Krapac IG , Lin Y-F , Yannarell AC 2009 Fate and transport of antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes following land application of manure waste. J. Environ. Qual. 38 1086 - 1108    DOI : 10.2134/jeq2008.0128
Chien Y-C , Chen C-J , Lin T-H , Chen S-H , Chien Y-C 2011 Characteristics of microbial aerosols released from chicken and swine feces. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 61 882 - 889    DOI : 10.3155/1047-3289.61.8.882
Clark S , Rylander R , Larsson L 1983 Airborne bacteria, endotoxin and fungi in dust in poultry and swine confinement buildings. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 44 537 - 541    DOI : 10.1080/15298668391405265
Cole D , Todd L , Wing S 2000 Concentrated swine feeding operations and public health: a review of occupational and community health effects. Environ. Health Perspect. 108 685 - 699    DOI : 10.1289/ehp.00108685
Cormier Y , Tremblay G , Meriaux A , Brochu G , Lavoie J 1990 Airborne microbial contents in two types of swine confinement buildings in Quebec. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 51 304 - 309    DOI : 10.1080/15298669091369709
Crook B , Robertson JF , Glass SA , Botheroyd EM , Lacey J , Topping MD 1991 Airborne dust, ammonia, microorganisms, and antigens in pig confinement houses and the respiratory health of exposed farm workers. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 52 271 - 279    DOI : 10.1080/15298669191364721
Cruz AT , Cazacu AC , Allen CH 2007 Pantoea agglomerans, a plant pathogen causing human disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45 1989 - 1992    DOI : 10.1128/JCM.00632-07
de Evgrafov MR , Kõll P , Frank DN , Baumgartner LK , Robertson CE , Hernández MT , Pace NR 2013 Molecular analysis of bacterial and circovirus bioaerosols in concentrated animal feeding operations. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 47 755 - 766    DOI : 10.1080/02786826.2013.789477
DeSantis TZ , Hugenholtz P , Larsen N , Rojas M , Brodie EL , Keller K 2006 Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72 5069 - 5072    DOI : 10.1128/AEM.03006-05
Donham K , Haglind P , Peterson Y , Rylander R , Belin L 1989 Environmental and health studies of farm workers in Swedish swine confinement buildings. Br. J. Ind. Med. 46 31 - 37
Duchaine C , Grimard Y , Cormier Y 2000 Influence of building maintenance, environmental factors, and seasons on airborne contaminants of swine confinement buildings. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 61 56 - 63
Edgar RC , Haas BJ , Clemente JC , Quince C , Knight R 2011 UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27 2194 - 200    DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381
Felsenstein J 1985 Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39 783 - 791    DOI : 10.2307/2408678
FDA (Food and Drug Administration) 2004 FDA Approved Animal Drug Products. Drug Information Laboratory Virginia/Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine
Franzetti A , Gandolfi I , Gaspari E , Ambrosini R , Bestetti G 2011 Seasonal variability of bacteria in fine and coarse urban air particulate matter. Environ. Biotechnol. 90 745 - 753    DOI : 10.1007/s00253-010-3048-7
Gibbs SG , Green CF , Tarwater PM , Mota LC , Mena KD , Scarpino PV 2006 Isolation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria from the air plume downwind of a swine confined or concentrated animal feeding operation. Environ. Health Perspect. 114 1032 - 1037    DOI : 10.1289/ehp.8910
Gilchrist MJ , Greko C , Walling DB , Beran GW , Riley DG , Thorne PS 2007 The potential role of concentrated animal feeding operations in infectious disease epidemics and antibiotic resistance. Environ. Health Perspect. 115 313 - 316    DOI : 10.1289/ehp.8837
Holness DL , O’Blenis EL , Sass-Kortsak A , Pilger C , Nethercott JR 1987 Respiratory effects and dust exposures in hog confinement farming. Am. J. Ind. Med. 11 571 - 580    DOI : 10.1002/ajim.4700110509
Hong P-Y , Li X , Yang X , Shinkai T , Zhang Y , Wang X , Mackie R 2012 Monitoring airborne biotic contaminants in the indoor environment of pig and poultry confinement buildings. Environ. Microbiol. 14 1420 - 1431    DOI : 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02726.x
Jensen LB , Hammerum AM , Bager F , Aarestrup FM 2002 Streptogramin resistance amongEnterococcus faeciumisolated from production animals in Denmark in 1997. Microb. Drug Resist. 8 369 - 374    DOI : 10.1089/10766290260469642
Kelly WJ , Asmundson RV , Hopcroft DH 1987 Isolation and characterization of strictly anaerobic, cellulolytic spore former:Clostridium chartatabidumsp. nov. Arch. Microbiol. 147 169 - 173    DOI : 10.1007/BF00415279
Kimura M 1980 A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16 111 - 120    DOI : 10.1007/BF01731581
Leser TD , Amenuvor JZ , Jensen TK , Lindecrona RH , Boye M , Moller K 2002 Culture-independent analysis of gut bacteria: the pig gastrointestinal tract microbiota revisted. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68 673 - 690    DOI : 10.1128/AEM.68.2.673-690.2002
Leung K , Topp E 2001 Bacterial community dynamics in liquid swine manure storage: molecular analysis using DGGE/PCR of 16S rDNA. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 38 169 - 177    DOI : 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00895.x
Millner PD 2009 Bioaerosols associated with animal production operations. Bioresour. Technol. 100 5379 - 5385    DOI : 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.026
Nehme B , Létourneau V , Forster RJ , Veillette M , Duchaine C 2008 Culture-independent approach of the bacterial bioaerosol diversity in the standard swine confinement building, and assessment of the seasonal effect. Environ. Microbiol. 10 665 - 675    DOI : 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01489.x
Predicala BZ , Urban JE , Maghirang RG , Jereze SB , Goodband RD 2002 Assessment of bioaerosols in swine barns by filtration and impaction. Curr. Microbiol. 44 136 - 140    DOI : 10.1007/s00284-001-0064-y
Ravva SV , Sarreal CZ , Mandrell RE 2011 Bacterial communities in aerosols and manure samples from two different dairies in Central and Sonoma Valleys of California. PLoS One 6 e17281 -    DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0017281
Rintala H , Pitkaranta M , Toivola M , Paulin L , Nevalainen A 2008 Diversity and seasonal dynamics of bacterial community in indoor environment. BMC Microbiol. 8 56 -    DOI : 10.1186/1471-2180-8-56
Saitou N , Nei M 1987 The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 406 - 425
Smith TC , Harper AL , Nair R , Wardyn SE , Hanson BM , Ferguson DD , Dressler AE 2011 Emerging swine zoonoses. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 11 1225 - 1234    DOI : 10.1089/vbz.2010.0182
Tamura K , Peterson D , Peterson N , Stecher G , Nei M , Kumar S 2011 MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28 2731 - 2739    DOI : 10.1093/molbev/msr121
Von Essen S , Scheppers L , Robbins R , Donham K 1998 Respiratory tract inflammation in swine confinement workers studied using induced sputum and exhaled nitric oxide. Clin. Toxicol. 36 557 - 565    DOI : 10.3109/15563659809028049
Webster GF , Ruggieri MR , McGinley KJ 1981 Correlation ofPropionibacterium-acnespopulations with the presence of triglycerides on nonhuman skin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41 1269 - 1270
Wegener HC , Aarestrup FM , Jensen LB , Hammerum AM , Bager F 1999 Use of antimicrobial growth promoters in food animals andEnterococcus faeciumresistance to therapeutic antimicrobial drugs in Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5 329 - 335    DOI : 10.3201/eid0503.990303
Wegener HC 2003 Antibiotics in animal feed and their role in resistance development. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6 439 - 445    DOI : 10.1016/j.mib.2003.09.009
Wing S , Wolf S 2000 Intensive operations, health and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents. Environ. Health Perspect. 108 233 - 242    DOI : 10.1289/ehp.00108233
Zedja JE , Hurst TS , Rhodes CS , Barber EM , McDuffie HH , Dosman JA 1993 Respiratory health of swine producers: focus on young workers. Chest 103 702 - 709    DOI : 10.1378/chest.103.3.702
Zedja JE , Barber EM , Dosman JA , Olenchock SA , McDuffie HH , Rhodes CS , Hurst TS 1994 Respiratory health status in swine producers relates to endotoxin exposure in the presence of low dust levels. J. Occup. Med. 36 49 - 56