The performance of an partial relay selection on the decodeandforward (DF) mode cognitive radio (CR) relay networks is studied, with some important factors, including the outage probability, the bit error ratio (BER), and the average channel capacity being analyzed. Different from the conventional relay selection schemes, the impact of spectrum sensing process as well as the spectrum utilization efficiency of primary users on the performance of DFbased CR relaying networks has been taken into consideration. In particular, the exact closedform expressions for the figures of merit such as outage probability, BER, and average channel capacity over independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) Rayleigh fading channels, have been derived in this paper. The validity of the proposed analysis is proven by simulation, which showed that the numerical results are consistent with the theoretical analysis in terms of the outage probability, the BER and the average channel capacity. It is also shown that the full spatial diversity order can always be obtained at the signaltonoise ratio (SNR) range of [0dB, 15dB] in the presence of multiple potential relays.
1. Introduction
C
ognitive radio (CR) is regarded as a promising technology to provide high bandwidth to mobile users via heterogeneous wireless network architectures and dynamic spectrum access techniques, and the significant improvement of efficiency of spectrum utilization
[1]

[5]
.
In CR networks, however, the CR users must immediately vacate the licensed spectrum bands they are using once the primary users return to access those bands. As a result, the interruptive transmissions in unlicensed users will lead to a discontinuous data service and intolerable delay. Challenges aforementioned can be addressed by using cognitive relaying, which enables distributed cognitive users to collaborate with each other and share their distinct spectrum bands. A seamless data transmission can therefore be realized by using cooperative relays, and a mutual benefit among CR users can be brought forward by communicating with each other to minimize the miss detection probability. Besides, more benefits can be brought by using cognitive relays, such as an expanded coverage, a better immunity against signal fading, a more systemwide power saving and an increased throughput of the whole system
[6]

[9]
.
The diversity gain of cooperative networks can thus be improved by employing multiple relays. However, in the presence of multiple relays, a sophisticated resource allocation algorithm is required to perform so as to guarantee an orthogonal channel (in carrier frequencies, time slots or codes) being allocated to each relay and avoid interrelayinterference
[10]
,
[11]
. As the number of relays increases, the cost of bandwidth penalty may even deteriorate the benefits brought by cooperative relays. In consideration of the challenges aforementioned, relay selection can be regarded as one of the most attractive methods to solve the complicated interferencemitigation issue met in the multirelay systems. Selecting the best relay to forward data is an ideal way to effectively balance the complexity and the spectral efficiency improvement due to the full diversity order obtained
[12]
,
[13]
. Only two time slots are thus required to enable two orthogonal channels (regardless of the number of relays) to be necessarily reserved in both the source and the selected relay nodes
[14]
.
Currently, relay selection has been treated in several existed literatures (see, e.g.,
[15]

[17]
and the references therein). Most of those works deal with the case where the primary users are absent for the relay selection. By selecting the optimal relay from multiple candidates, only one relay is active in each time slot so as to significantly improve the spectral efficiency and obtain a full spatial diversity order simultaneously. By and large, relay selection techniques in cooperative communications systems can be classified into two modes, i.e., the opportunistic relay selection
[18]
and the partial relay selection
[19]
. In the former, the channel state information (CSI) of both the sourcetorelay (
S→R
) and relaytodestination (
R→D
) links should be considered by the central unit. In the latter, on the other hand, the CSI of only the
S→R
or
R→D
link is necessarily considered. In
[20]
, the closedform expressions for the lower bound and asymptotic symbol error rate of in Rayleigh fading relay channel with opportunistic relay selection are derived. The impact of relay selection with an outdated CSI on the capacity of cooperative communication systems has been studied in
[21]
,
[22]
, where the closedform expressions for channel capacity of opportunistic relay selection with four classical adaptive transmission techniques are given out by
[21]
, and that with partial relay selection has been studied in
[22]
. The opportunistic relay selection is proven to have an advantage over the partial relay selection if the SNR of links is relative high and a perfect CSI is assumed at the same time.
It is worth pointing out that the relay selection in cognitive networks got a considerable attention in recent years, with some important factors, such as mutual interference between primary users and secondary users, being taken into consideration in CR relay network
[23]

[26]
. The impact of interference threshold on the amplifyandforward (AF) underlay cognitive networks has been studied in
[27]
. In
[28]
, which focuses on exploiting the transmission opportunity in CR networks, cooperative communication appears to be a promising approach to improve the throughput of the secondary users by increasing the spatial and spectrum diversity orders. The author in
[29]
analyzes the outage probability of AF relaying cognitive networks, in which the best relay is selected based on either full CSI or partial CSI feedback. The BER of AF systems with partial relay selection in CR network is study in
[30]
. Furthmore, some efficient spectrum sensing schemes are also proposed in
[31]

[33]
. However, to the best of the our knowledge, the impact of spectrum sensing process and spectrum utilization efficiency of primary users on the overlay CR relay networks with partial relay selection has still not been studied considerably in prior works.
In this paper, partial relay selection in DFbased CR networks is studied. One of main contributions in this paper is to derive the exact closedform expressions of some figures of merit, such as the outage probability, BER and the average channel capacity over i.i.d. Rayleigh fading channels, for the proposed relay selection mode. In particular, parameters aforementioned are proven to be dependent on spectrum sensing process as well as the spectrum utilization efficiency of primary users. Besides, a full diversity order is proven to be obtained at low SNR regime, regardless of the spectrum utilization efficiency of the primary users. At high SNR regime, on the other hand, the diversity order keeps unchanged, regardless of the number of potential relays. The validity of the proposed theoretical analysis is also proven by simulations.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the system model of partial relay selection in cognitive radio relay networks. The probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) of received SNR at destination are introduced in section 3. The closedform expressions of some critical parameters, including outage probability, BER, and average channel capacity, are derived in section 4. Section 5 gives out the numerical results. Finally, section 6 concludes this paper.
Notation
: ℜ{
x
} and ℑ{
x
} are the real and imaginary part of
x
, respectively.
γ_{ab}
represents the SNR of
a→b
link.
f_{X}
(.) and
F_{X}
(.) represent the PDF and CDF of the random variable (RV)
X
, respectively. Pr(.) denotes the probability.
2. System Model
In this section, a CR relay network, which consists of a secondary source terminal (
S
),
M
halfduplex DF potential relays (as denoted by the set of Ω={
R_{i}
,
i
=1,2,
_{…}
M
}), and a destination terminal (
D
) (please see
Fig. 1
), is considered.
S
communicates with
D
using a time division multiple access (TDMA) arrangement. Hence, two time slots are needed to complete one communication session. In the first time slot,
S
broadcasts the packets to the relays. In the second time slot, each potential relay decides whether to become a candidate for the best relay selection by examining two conditions, decoding of the received signal and availability of the SH. After the best relay selection, the selected relay forward a regenerated replica to
D
. At the end of each communication session,
D
combines the received signals using maximal ratio combining (MRC).
A singlehop cooperating network with multirelays in overlay cognitive radio relay networks
Without loss of generality, the wireless channels of
S
→
R_{i}
,
R_{i}
→
D
and
S
→
D
links are assumed to be i.i.d. Rayleigh distributed RVs. Therefore, we have the circularly symmetric complex Gaussian channel gain
h_{ab}
(
a
,
b
∈{
S
,
R_{i}
,
D
}) with mean zero and variance
σ
^{2}
between node
a
and
b
, which is denoted by
h_{ab}
~CN (0,
σ
^{2}
). In brief, we assume that all nodes transmit with unit power and the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) power is
N
_{0}
, and the effective SNR is given by
From
[34, Eq.237)]
,
γ_{ab}
can be formulated as a chisquare (
χ
^{2}
) random variable with 2 degrees of freedom, and its PDF is given by
where
denotes the average SNR of
a→b
link. Accordingly, the average SNR of each
S
→
R_{i}
link can be represented as
. The average SNR of
R_{i}
→
D
and
S
→
D
links can be denoted by
respectively.
3. PDF and CDF of the RelaySelection Channel
In this section, two conditions, i.e., the potential relay condition and the relay selection rule, will be analyzed, and afterwards, the PDF and CDF of the proposed relay selection channels are given out.
 3.1 Potential Relay Condition
The relay may be a in the set of potential relay,Ω, only if it has successfully decoded the received packets and acquired the SH.
1) Successful Decoding:
In order to decode successfully, the target rate
r
, measured in bits per second per Hertz, is lower than the mutual information, the successful decoding probability can be written as
where
γ_{SRi}
and
denote the SNR and the average SNR of
S
→
R_{i}
link, respectively, and
γ_{th}
=2
^{2r}
−1 is the threshold SNR.
2) Successful Acquisition of SH:
When the primary users is absent with probability, Pr[H
_{0}
^{PU}
], and present with probability, Pr[H
_{1}
^{PU}
], the opportunity of SH is obtained by
R_{i}
with probability
P_{ai}
. The probability of
R_{i}
successful acquisition of SH can be rewritten as
where the first term denotes, the probability of the secondary users obtain the SH when the primary user is absent with false alarm probability,
P_{f,i}
; the second term denotes, the probability of the secondary users obtain the SH when the primary user is present with detection probability,
P_{de,i}
.
Therefore, if the
R_{i}
have successful spectrum acquisition probability
P_{ai}
and successful decoding probability
P_{di}
, the relay become successful potential relay with probability Q
_{i}
, Pr[
R_{i}
∈Ω]=
P_{di}P_{di}
.
Since all the
S
→
R_{i}
links is i.i.d. Rayleigh channels,
Therefore,
P_{d}
_{1}
=
P_{d}
_{2}
=…=
P_{dM}
=
P_{d}
. Likewise,
P_{a}
_{1}
=
P_{a}
_{2}
=…=
P_{aM}
=
P_{a}
. Hence, Q
_{1}
=Q
_{2}
=…Q
_{M}
=Q. In this case, Pr[Ω=
m
], becomes
where Ω is the cardinality of Ω.
 3.2 Relay Selection Rule
In this subsection, for the Rayleigh fading on the
R_{i}
→
D
links is i.i.d., the average SNR in each the
R_{i}
→
D
links is given by
, and is the same as the average SNR of
S
→
D
link. In other words,
Two scenarios, i.e., Ω=0 and Ω≥1, will be analyzed separately as follows.
1)
Ω=0
:
When the set of Ω is null,
φ
(with no elements content the condition of potential relay), the secondary users only have the
S
→
D
link. Hence, the effective SNR at the destination can be given as
γ
_{d}
=
γ
_{SD}
. In this case, the PDF of
γ
_{d}
becomes
where
is the average SNR of
S
→
D
link.
Evidently, (4) leads to
2)
Ω≥1
:
The secondary user selects the optimal relay according to the following rule, i.e.,
From Appendix I (18), with the partial relay selection rule (6), the conditional PDF of
γ_{RkD}
can be derived as
In the presence of cooperative relays, the spatial diversity order can be improved by utilizing the relayforward links together with the
S
→
D
link. Some combining method, e.g., MRC, can be employed to the destination to optimize the effective SNR as
γ_{d}
=
γ_{RkD}
+
γ_{SD}
.
From Appendix I (19), in this case, the conditional PDF of
γ_{d}
for a given Ω can be derived as
Evidently, (8) leads to (the detail please see Appendix II)
Hence, the uncondition CDF of the received SNR is derived as
4. Performance Analysis
In this section, the closedform expressions for the outage probability, BER and channel capacity will be derived.
 4.1 Outage Probability Analysis
For a preset threshold
γ_{th}
, from (10), the outage probability of the partial relay selection scheme can be derived as
 4.2 Bit Error Ratio Analysis
Using
[34, Eq.230)]
,
[35, Eq.4)]
, the BER of the proposed partial relay selection can be derived as
1)
Ω=0
:
2)
Ω≥1
:
with aid of
[36, Eq31]
, the result becomes
Hence, the unconditional BER is derived as
and
η
are specified modulation constants determined by modulation format (e.g., for phase shift keying (PSK) modulation, we have
η
=2
[37]
).
 4.3 Channel Capacity Analysis
From Appendix III, the closedform expression for the channel capacity of the proposed partial relay selection can be given as
where
B
stands for the signal bandwidth.
5. Numerical Results
In this section, we study the performance of some of the derived closedform expressions through numerical evaluation as well as using Monte Carlo simulation. Binary phase shift keying (BPSK) modulation is considered in this paper, and this implies
η
=2. Let us start with some figure of merit, including the outage probability, BER and the average channel capacity over i.i.d. Rayleigh fading channels which implies
A normalized system bandwidth is assumed.
The outage probability as a function of
γ
for different number of potential relays,
M
=0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, is depicted in
Fig.2
. At low average SNR, since with larger number of relays, the destination has more opportunity to correct decode the received data. Hence, the spatial diversity order is increasing with the number of potential relays. At high average SNR, since the relay can decoded the received data packets correctly regardless of the number of potential relays, two copies are transmitted to the destination. Hence, the diversity order keeps two with opportunity, and the slope of curves keeping same as in the high average SNR values are shown in
Fig. 2
. However, the number of candidate relays which acquire SH and decode the received packets successfully is increased by increasing the number of relays. The more optimum relays can be chose from the candidate relays set with larger number of elements. Hence, the outage probability performance is improved by the larger number of relays.
Outage probability versus the average SNR of the links for different values of M using simulations and analytical results
By keeping
M
=5 unchanged, for different
Pr
[H
_{1}
^{PU}
], a smaller
Pr
[H
_{1}
^{PU}
] implies a larger probability of acquisition SH, and the outage probability is therefore a monotonically increasing function of
Pr
[H
_{1}
^{PU}
], as shown in
Fig. 3
. Note that
Pr
[H
_{1}
^{PU}
]=0 implies the primary user is absent all the time. If the relays can decode successfully, it can be the candidate relays. For all Pr[H
_{1}
^{PU}
]>0 Hscenarios, the primary user is presented occasionally.
Outage probability versus the average SNR of the links for different values of Pr[H_{1}^{PU}] using simulations and analytical results
BER as a function of average SNR is illustrated in
Fig. 4
. For a specific average SNR of links, spectrum sensing process and spectrum utilization efficiency of primary users, more potential relays implies a better BER performance due to an improved relay link. However, similar to the properties exhibited in outage probability performance, the slope of curves is the same when average SNR goes beyond a certain threshold.
BER versus the average SNR of the links for different values of M using simulations and analytical results
The effect of the probability of the primary users is present
Pr
[H
_{1}
^{PU}
] on BER performance of the partial relay selection is also illustrated in
Fig. 5
. Like in the outage probability performance, BER is also a monotonically increasing function of
Pr
[H
_{1}
^{PU}
]. At low SNRregime, the diversity order is impacted by the number of relays, because the cooperative networks with more relays have more opportunities to successfully delivery the data. However, at high SNRregime, the data can be successfully decoded and forwarded, with the diversity order being uncorrelated to the number of relays. Hence, the slopes for the BERcurves in terms of SNR exhibit some changes in
Fig. 5
.
BER versus the average SNR of the links for different values of Pr[H_{1}^{PU}] using simulations and analytical results
The average channel capacity as a function of average SNR for the proposed relay selection scheme is described in
Fig. 6
.The channel capacity is a monotonically increasing function of the number of available relays. Note that
M
=0 implies the secondary users only have the
S
→
D
links. For all
M
>0 scenarios, if the relay can decode successfully, it could be the candidate relays, and the secondary users will have the opportunity to use the relay. Hence, the capacity can be improved by the diversity order. At high average SNR, since the diversity order remain unchanged. Hence, with large number of
M
, further increasing
M
may cause the average channel capacity increase slightly. When
the noise significantly impacts the performance. Therefore, it appears some gap between analytic and simulation results for capacities at low SNRregime, as shown in
Fig. 6
. In fact, if linear coordinate instead of logarithmic coordinate was utilized, the gap would appear to be very little.
Average channel capacity versus the average SNR of the links for different values of M using simulations and analytical results
6. Conclusion
The performance of DF cooperative cognitive networks was studied, with the exact closedform expressions, including the outage probability, the BER and the channel capacity, being derived. The validity of the proposed theoretical closeform expression on the critical figures of merit, including the outage probability, the BER and the average channel capacity, was proven via simulations, and the theoretical analysis matches the corresponding numerical results well. It was also shown in the numerical results that some other parameters, including the number of relays, spectrum sensing process, and the spectrum utilization efficiency of primary users impact the system performance greatly in the presence of multiple potential relays. Simulation results proved that the full spatial diversity order can be achieved at low SNR by partial relay selection.
BIO
Bin Zhong, received his B.Sc. degree in electronic and information engineering from Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, China in 2005, the M.Sc. degree in detection technology and automatic equipment from Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China in 2011, the Ph.D. degree in communication and information system from University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB), Beijing, China in 2014. He is currently a Lecturer of the school of information and electrical engineering in the Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, China. His current research interests include wireless communications theory, cognitive networks, and diversity and cooperative communications. He is also a recipient of “Best Paper Award” at IEEE International Conference on Communication Technology, September 2012, Chengdu, China.
Zhongshan Zhang, received the B.E. and M.S. degrees in computer science from the Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT) in 1998 and 2001, respectively, and received Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering in 2004 from BUPT. From Aug. 2004 he joined DoCoMo Beijing Laboratories as an associate researcher, and was promoted to be a researcher in Dec. 2005. From Feb. 2006, he joined University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, as a postdoctoral fellow. From Apr. 2009, he joined the Department of Research and Innovation (R&I), AlcatelLucent, Shanghai, as a Research Scientist. From Aug. 2010 to Jul. 2011, he worked in NEC China Laboratories, as a Senior Researcher. He is currently a professor of the School of Computer and Communication Engineering in the University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB). His main research interests include statistical signal processing, selforganized networking, cognitive radio, and cooperative communications
Dandan Zhang, received her B.Sc. degree in communication engineering in University of Science and Technology Beijing in 2013. She is currently working toward the M.Sc. degree with the Beijing Engineering and Technology Research Center for Convergence Networks and Ubiquitous Services, University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB), Beijing, China. Her current research interests include wireless communications theory, cognitive radio, and cooperative communications.
Keping Long, received his M.S. and Ph.D. Degrees at UESTC in 1995 and 1998, respectively. From Sep. 1998 to Aug. 2000, he worked as a postdoctoral research fellow at National Laboratory of Switching technology and telecommunication networks in Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT). From Sep. 2000 to Jun. 2001, he worked as an associate professor at Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT). From Jul. 2001 to Nov. 2002, he was a research fellow in ARC Special Research Centre for Ultra Broadband Information Networks (CUBIN) at the University of Melbourne, Australia. He is now a professor and dean at School of Computer & Communication Engineering (CCE), University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB). He is the IEEE senior member, and the Member of Editorial Committee of Sciences in China Series F and China Communications. He is also the TPC and the ISC member for COIN2003/04/05/06/07/08/09/10, IEEE IWCN2010, ICON04/06, APOC2004/06/08, Cochair of organization member for IWCMC2006, TPC chair of COIN2005/2008, TPC Cochair of COIN2008/2010, He was awarded for the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China in 2007, selected as the Chang Jiang Scholars Program Professor of China in 2008. His research interests are Optical Internet Technology, New Generation Network Technology, Wireless Information Network, Valueadded Service and Secure Technology of Network. He has published over 200 papers, 20 keynotes speaks and invited talks in the international conferences and local conferences.
Haiyan Cao, received her B.Sc. and M.S. Degrees at Anhui University of technology in 2000 and 2003, respectively, and received Ph.D. degree in communication and information system in 2006 from South China University of Technology. She is currently an Associate Professor of the College of Communication Engineering in the Hangzhou Dianzi University. Her main research interests include MultipleInput MultipleOutput (MIMO) Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) systems, and cooperative communications.
View Fulltext
Zhang Z.
,
Long K.
,
Wang J.
2013
“SelfOrganization Paradigms and Optimization Approaches for Cognitive Radio Technologies: A Survey,”
IEEE Wireless Commun.
20
(2)
36 
42
DOI : 10.1109/MWC.2013.6507392
Akyildiz I. F.
,
Lee W. Y.
,
Vuran M. C.
,
Mohanty S.
2006
“Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey,”
Computer Networks
50
(13)
2127 
2159
DOI : 10.1016/j.comnet.2006.05.001
Zhang Z.
,
Long K.
,
Wang J.
,
Dressler F.
2014
“On swarm intelligence inspired selforganized networking: its bionic mechanisms, designing principles and optimization approaches,”
IEEE Commun. Surv. Tut
16
(1)
513 
537
DOI : 10.1109/SURV.2013.062613.00014
Alkheir A. A.
,
Ibnkahla M.
2011
“Performance analysis of cognitive radio relay networks using decode and forward selection relaying over Rayleigh fading channels,”
in Proc. of IEEE Global Telecommn. Conf. (GLOBECOM)
1 
5
Liang Y.C.
,
Chen K.C.
,
Li G. Y.
,
Manhonen P.
2011
“Cognitive radio networking and communications: an overview,”
IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.
60
(7)
3386 
3407
DOI : 10.1109/TVT.2011.2158673
Zhang Z.
,
Zhang W.
,
Tellambura C.
2009
“OFDMA uplink frequency offset estimation via cooperative relaying,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.
8
(9)
4450 
4456
DOI : 10.1109/TWC.2009.081525
Nabar R. U.
,
Bolcskei H.
,
Kneubuhler F. W.
2004
“Fading relay channels: performance limits and spacetime signal design,”
IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun.
22
(6)
1099 
1109
DOI : 10.1109/JSAC.2004.830922
Zhang Z.
,
Huangfu W.
,
Long K.
,
Zhang X.
,
Zhang X.
,
Zhong B.
2013
“On the designing principles and optimization approaches of bioinspired selforganized network: a survey,”
Science China Information Sciences.
56
(7)
1 
28
Jia J.
,
Zhang J.
,
Zhang Q.
2009
“Cooperative relay for cognitive radio network,”
IEEE INFOCOM
2304 
2312
Zhang Z.
,
Zhang W.
,
Tellambur C.
2009
“Cooperative OFDM channel estimation in the presence of frequency offsets,”
IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.
58
(7)
3447 
3459
DOI : 10.1109/TVT.2009.2016345
Gunduz D.
,
Yener A.
,
Goldsmith A.
,
Poor H. V.
2009
“The multiway relay channel,”
in Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. on Infor.Theory (ISIT)
Seoul, Korea
2009
339 
343
Ikki S. S.
,
Ahmed M. H.
2010
“Performance analysis of adaptive decodeandforward cooperative diversity networks with bestrelay selection,”
IEEE Trans. Commun.
58
(1)
68 
72
DOI : 10.1109/TCOMM.2010.01.080080
Zhang Z.
,
Tellambura C.
,
Schober R.
2010
“Improved OFDMA uplink transmission via cooperative relaying in the presence of frequency offsetspart I: ergodic information rate analysis,”
Euro. Trans. Telecommun.
21
(3)
224 
240
Muller A.
,
Speidel J.
2008
“Relay selection in dualhop transmission systems: Selection strategies and performance results,”
in Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. Communications (ICC)
2008
4998 
5003
Ahmed I.
,
Nasri A.
,
Michalopoulos D. S.
,
Schober R.
,
Mallik R. K.
2012
“Relay subset selection and fair power allocation for best and partial relay selection in generic noise and interference,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.
11
(5)
1828 
1839
DOI : 10.1109/TWC.2012.031212.111113
Li Y.
,
Zhang Z.
,
Zhang X.
,
ZHONG X. B.
,
Long K.
“Best relay selection in decode and forward cooperative cognitive radio relay networks over rayleigh fading channels,”
in Proc. of IET Inter. Conf. on Inform. & Commun.Tech. (IETICT)
Apr. 2013
Zhang Z.
,
Tellambura C.
,
Schober R.
2010
“Improved OFDMA uplink transmission via cooperative relaying in the presence of frequency offsetspart II: Outage information rate analysis,”
Euro. Trans. Telecommun.
21
(3)
241 
250
Torabi M.
,
Haccoun D.
,
Frigon J.F.
2011
“Impact of outdated relay selection on the capacity of AF opportunistic relaying systems with adaptive transmission over nonidentically distributed links,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.
10
(11)
3626 
3631
DOI : 10.1109/TWC.2011.092711.110136
Chen H.
,
Liu J.
,
Dong Z.
,
Zhou Y.
,
Guo W.
2011
“Exact capacity analysis of partial relay selection under outdated CSI over rayleigh fading channels,”
IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.
60
(8)
4014 
4018
DOI : 10.1109/TVT.2011.2167166
Yeoh P. L.
,
Elkashlan M.
,
Chen Z.
,
Collings I. B.
2011
“SER of multiple amplifyandforward relays with selection diversity,”
IEEE Trans. Commun.
59
(8)
2078 
2083
DOI : 10.1109/TCOMM.2011.053111.090279
Torabi M.
,
Haccoun D.
2011
“Capacity of amplifyandforward selective relaying with adaptive transmission under outdated channel information,”
IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.
60
(5)
2416 
2422
DOI : 10.1109/TVT.2011.2139232
Zhong B.
,
Zhang Z.
,
Zhang X.
,
Li Y.
,
Long K.
2013
“Impact of partial relay selection on the capacity of communications systems with outdated CSI and adaptive transmission techniques,”
EURASIP J. Wirel.Comm.
1 
13
Lee J.
,
Wang H.
,
Andrews J. G.
,
Hong D.
2011
“Outage probability of cognitive relay networks with interference constraints,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.
10
(2)
390 
395
DOI : 10.1109/TWC.2010.120310.090852
Zou Y.
,
Zhu J.
,
Zheng B.
,
Yao Y.
2010
“An adaptive cooperation diversity scheme with bestrelay selection in cognitive radio networks,”
IEEE Trans. Signal Processing
58
(10)
5438 
5445
DOI : 10.1109/TSP.2010.2053708
Zou Y.
,
Yao Y.
,
Zheng B.
2011
“Cognitive transmissions with multiple relays in cognitive radio networks,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.
10
(2)
648 
659
DOI : 10.1109/TWC.2010.120610.100830
Zou Y.
,
Yao Y.
,
Zheng B.
2012
“Cooperative relay techniques for cognitive radio systems: Spectrum sensing and secondary user transmissions,”
IEEE Commun.Magazine
50
(4)
98 
103
DOI : 10.1109/MCOM.2012.6178840
Hussian S. I.
,
Alouini M.S.
,
Hasna M.
,
Qarage K.
“Partial relay selection in underlay cognitive networks with fixed gain relays,”
in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC)
May 2012
Zhang Q.
,
Jia J.
,
Zhang J.
2009
“Cooperative relay to improve diversity in cognitive radio networks,”
IEEE Commun. Mag.
47
(2)
111 
117
DOI : 10.1109/MCOM.2009.4785388
Fredj K. B.
,
Aissa S.
2012
“Performance of amplifyandforward systems with partial relay selection under spectrumsharing constraints,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.
11
(2)
500 
504
DOI : 10.1109/TWC.2011.120911.102240
Tandra R.
,
Mishra S.M.
,
Sahai A.
2009
“What is a spectrum hole and what does it take to recognize one?”
inProc. of IEEE
97
(5)
824 
848
DOI : 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2015710
Wu Q.
,
Ding G.
,
Wang J.
,
Yao Y.
2013
“Spatialtemporal opportunity detection for spectrumheterogeneous cognitive radio networks: Twodimensional sensing,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.
12
(2)
516 
526
DOI : 10.1109/TWC.2012.122212.111638
Ding G.
,
Wang J.
,
Wu Q.
,
Song F.
,
Chen Y.
2013
“Spectrum sensing in opportunityheterogeneous cognitive sensor networks: How to cooperate?”
IEEE Sensors Journal
13
(11)
4247 
4255
DOI : 10.1109/JSEN.2013.2264161
Proakis J. G.
,
Salehi M.
2008
Digital Communications.
McGrawHill
New York
Zhao Y.
,
Adve R.
,
Lim T. J.
2006
“Symbol error rate of selection amplifyandforward relay systems,”
IEEE Commun.Lett.
10
(11)
757 
759
DOI : 10.1109/LCOMM.2006.060774
Gradshteyn I. S.
,
Ryzhik I. M.
2007
Table of Integrals, Series, and Products
7th ed.
Academic Press, Inc.
Michalopoulos D. S.
,
Suraweera H. A.
,
Karagiannidis G. K.
,
Schober R.
2012
“Amplifyandforward relay selection with outdated channel estimates,”
IEEE Trans. Commun.
60
(5)
1278 
1290
DOI : 10.1109/TCOMM.2012.032012.110430