An iterative boundary element method for a wing-in-ground effect

International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering.
2014.
Jun,
6(2):
282-296

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

- Published : June 30, 2014

Download

PDF

e-PUB

PubReader

PPT

Export by style

Share

Article

Metrics

Cited by

TagCloud

NOMENCLATURE

INTRODUCTION

Effect of the ground has several impacts on a structure flying above the surface. These structures use the several benefits that the surface serves to them, which is named as ground effect flight. Different definitions of ground effect can be found in the literature and one of them defines it as “a phenomenon of aerodynamic, aeroelastic and aeroacoustic impacts on platforms flying in close proximity to an underlying surface” (
Reeves, 1993
; Rozhdestvensky, 2006). Efficient utilization of the ground effect proposed a different transportation technique other than mainly used, when the Russians first made use of it during the cold war (
Rozhdestvensky, 2006
).
Although first built for militaristic purposes, ground effect is a phenomenon that is generally exploited by Wing-in-Ground (WIG) effect crafts to improve transportation efficiency. Analyzing the Von Karman-Gabrielli Diagram (see
Fig. 1)
, WIG vehicles fill the gap between very efficient but slow conventional ships and not that efficient but very fast airplanes.
PPT Slide

Lager Image

FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM

Incompressible and inviscid continuity equation for an irrotational fluid is defined by the Laplace Equation which states that the total potential
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

NUMERICAL IMPLEMENTATION

It is possible to divide an arbitrary surface S into N panels to construct a numerical solution following Green’s identity with Dirichlet type of boundary condition given in Eq. (6). If Eq. (6) is to be performed for each panel of the surface (and the wake), we may write:
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

- Direct boundary element method

The geometries inside the flow will be divided into panels and in each panel, there will be collocation points at which all the calculations will be made. On each collocation point, constant strength sources and constant strength doublets will be distributed and at all these collocation points Eq. (14) must be satisfied. Let’s say a body inside the fluid has
- Iterative boundary element method

When objects in the flow have complex shapes and must be represented by large amounts of panels, the sufficiency of a computer may be questioned. For example, if
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

VALIDATION

- Validation with the single case

A wing in ground effect loses its advantage as it moves away from the ground. At infinite clearance, the wing will act like as if it is inside an unbounded fluid. If the ground is adequately far enough from the hydrofoil, then we must expect the hydrofoil to have its naked lift (as if there was nothing affecting the flow of the hydrofoil). To validate the results, a wing section of NACA6409 was chosen with the ground clearance selected to be
PPT Slide

Lager Image

Lift coefficients obtained for WIG effect and the single case.

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

- Validation with direct BEM and CFD

As a first step, results derived with the boundary element and the Finite Volume Methods (FVM) were compared for a single NACA6409 with an angle of attack of 4° in an unbounded fluid. Due to the absence of the ground effect, direct BEM was used. Obtained lift coefficient values were in good agreement as BEM found 1.1982 while FVM found 1.1857 for the wing.
Fig. 7
shows the negative pressure coefficient distribution derived with BEM and CFD. Except the leading edge region of the suction side, both methods gave compatible results with each other.
To prove the effectiveness of the IBEM, the obtained results are compared with the results obtained with Direct BEM and CFD. This time, the same wing section was solved with ground clearance
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

- Validation with results from the literature

Up to now, results found with IBEM seems to be in good agreement with the other methods. At this part of the paper, the results produced with the iterative method will be compared with the results found in the literature. This will be done in two steps. First, the lift coefficients produced with IBEM will be compared with
Abramowski’s (2007)
work and then the pressure distribution will be compared with the results produced by
Firooz and Gadami (2006)
.
Abramowski (2007)
have investigated the ground effect over a NACA/Munk M15 airfoil. Lift coefficients at different ground clearances have been found. Results found with IBEM is compared with the results in that study and this is given in
Fig. 9
.
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

TIME CONSUMPTIONS

Applicability of the iterative method relies on the results of time consumption. Iterative boundary element method will be preferred in problems containing high number of panels which will give solutions slower. IBEM stores fewer values in the computer’s memory while the direct boundary element uses more computer memory. This difference between the stored values of both methods leads to differences in the acquisition of a solution. IBEM responds more quickly and gives faster results (
Kinaci et al., 2011
).
To fully comprehend the advantage IBEM offers, a test case of a two dimensional NACA6409 wing with 0° AoA in ground effect was solved in different clearances from the ground for various numbers of panels. The results of the test case are given in
Table 2
.
Distances in
Table 2
are dimensionless and given in
Time elapsed in seconds for direct (a) and iterative methods (b). Number of panels is listed vertically while distances are listed horizontally in these tables.

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

GRID DEPENDENCY

Grid dependency is investigated by single precision BEM for a single NACA6409 wing at 4° of AoA. The lift coefficient and the pressure coefficient distribution along the wing is examined for 10, 20, 50, 100 and 250 panels. The lift coefficient vs. number of panels is given in
Fig. 12
.
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

GROUND EFFECT ON A NACA6409 WING

Up to this point, the accuracy and the efficiency of IBEM was proved. The code developed with the theory of IBEM was then used to assess a two dimensional NACA6409 wing-in-ground effect. Extreme ground effect (which is when the wing is
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK

In this paper, an iterative boundary element method for a solution of the flow around a wing-in-ground effect was proposed. Compared to RANSE solutions BEM is quite faster; which only discretizes the body inside the fluid rather than the whole fluid domain. However, as shown in this paper, there are methods to increase the efficiency of BEM. Iterative BEM is faster and has good precision, therefore; it seems to be more efficient than direct BEM. Iterative method shows good prospect in dealing with geometries in ground proximity where a higher number of panels must be used. These may include complex bodies of three dimensions in which case the panels will no longer be represented by lines but surfaces which will increase the calculation time significantly. Quick assessment of the efficiency of a particular type of wing section for WIG crafts can be made with IBEM.
When the wing is in extreme ground effect, the wing will possibly oscillate in the air due to vortex separations from the body. This will create unsteady motions for the wing. Unsteady motions will lead the WIG problem to be solved at each time step increasing the necessity for quicker solutions. It is thought that IBEM will prove its real worth in unsteady cases where the solution time is expected to drop significantly. As a future work, the generated code will be developed for solving unsteady motions to include extreme ground effect cases.
Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by Yildiz Technical University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Department. Project No: 2013-10-01-KAP02. The author feels gratitude towards Prof. Sakir BAL due to his generous aids while developing the code and Prof. Mesut GUNER for supporting the work.

Abramowski T.
2007
Numerical investigation of airfoil in ground proximity
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
45
(2)
425 -
436

Ahmed M.R.
,
Sharma S.D.
2005
An investigation on the aerodynamics of a symmetrical airfoil in ground effect
ExperimentalThermal and Fluid Science
29
(6)
633 -
647

Bal S.
2003
A numerical wave tank model for cavitating hydrofoils
Computational Mechanics
32
(4-6)
259 -
268

Bal S.
2007
A numerical method for the prediction of wave pattern of surface piercing cavitating hydrofoils
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C-Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
221
(12)
1623 -
1633

Bal S.
2008
Prediction of wave pattern and wave resistance of surface piercing bodies by a boundary element method
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
56
(3)
305 -
329

Bal S.
2011
The effect of finite depth on 2D and 3D cavitating hydrofoils
Journal of Marine Science and Technology
16
(2)
129 -
142

Barber T.J.
A study of water surface deformation due to tip vortices of a wing-in-ground effect
Journal of Ship Research
51
(2)
182 -
186

Daichin K.W.
2007
PIV measurements of the near-wake flow of an airfoil above a free surface
Journal of Hydrodynamics
19
(4)
482 -
487

Djavareshkian M.H.
,
Esmaeli A.
,
Parsani A.
2010
Aerodynamics of smart flap under ground effect
Aerospace Scienceand Technology
15
(8)
642 -
652

Firooz A.
,
Gadami M.
2006
Turbulence flow for NACA 4412 in unbounded flow and ground effect with different turbulence models and two ground conditions; fixed and moving ground conditions
BAIL 2006
81 -
84

Halloran M.
,
O’Meara S.
1999
Wing in ground effect craft review. [pdf]
DSTO Aeronautical and MaritimeResearch Laboratory
Melbourne
Available at: < http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA361836 >

Jamei S.
,
Maimun A.
,
Mansor S.
,
Azwadi N.
,
Priyanto A.
2012
Numerical investigation on aerodynamic characteristicsof a compound wing-in-ground effect
Journal of Aircraft
49
(5)
1297 -
1305

Jung K.H.
,
Chun H.H.
,
Kim H.J.
2008
Experimental investigation of wing-in-ground effect with a NACA6409 section
Journal of Marine Science and Technology
13
(4)
317 -
327

Katz J.
,
Plotkin A.
1991
Low speed aerodynamics-from wing theory to panel methods
1st ed.
Mc-Graw Hill Inc.
Singapore

Kim H.J.
,
Chun H.H.
,
Kwang H.J.
2009
Aeronumeric optimal design of a wing-in-ground-effect craft
Journal of Marine Science and Technology
14
(1)
39 -
50

Kinaci O.K.
,
Kukner A.
,
Bal S.
2011
Interactive effects of 2-D bodies in non-lifting flows
INT-NAM 2011
817 -
826

Kinaci O.K.
,
Kukner A.
,
Bal S.
2012
A parametric study on tandem hydrofoil interaction
HYDMAN 2012
145 -
155

Kinaci O.K.
,
Kukner A.
,
Bal S.
2010
Influence of wing configurations on aerodynamic characteristics of wings in ground effect
Journal of Aircraft
47
(3)
1030 -
1040

Lesnic D.
,
Elliott L.
,
Ingham D.B.
1997
An iterative boundary element method for solving numerically the Cauchy problem for the Laplace equation
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
20
(2)
123 -
133

Liang H.
,
Zong Z.
2011
A subsonic lifting surface theory for wing-in-ground effect
Acta Mechanica
219
(3-4)
203 -
217

Liang H.
,
Zhou L.
,
Zong Z.
,
Sun L.
2013
An analytical investigation of two-dimensional and three-dimensional biplanes operating in the vicinity of a free surface
Journal of Marine Science and Technology
18
(1)
12 -
31

Luo S.C.
,
Chen Y.S.
2012
Ground effect on flow past a wing with a NACA0015 cross-section
Experimental Thermaland Fluid Science
40
18 -
28

Ockfen A.E.
,
Matveev K.I.
2009
Aerodynamic characteristics of NACA4412 airfoil section with flap in extreme groundeffect
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
1
(1)
1 -
12

Phillips W.F.
,
Hunsaker D.F.
2013
Liftring-line predictions for induced drag and lift in ground effect
Journal of Aircraft
50
(4)
1226 -
1233

Reeves J.M.L.
1993
The case for surface effect research, platform applications and development opportunities
In: NATOA-GARD fluid mechanics panel (FMP) symposium in long range and long range endurance operation of aircraft

Rozhdestvensky K.V.
2006
Wing-in-ground effect vehicles
Progress in Aerospace Sciences
42
211 -
283

Zhigang T.
,
Wei Y.
2010
Complex flow for wing-in-ground effect craft with power augmented ram engine in cruise
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
23
1 -
8

Zong Z.
,
Liang H.
,
Zhou L.
2012
Lifting line theory for wing-in-ground effect in proximity to a free surface
Journal of Engineering Mathematics
74
143 -
158

Citing 'An iterative boundary element method for a wing-in-ground effect
'

@article{ E1JSE6_2014_v6n2_282}
,title={An iterative boundary element method for a wing-in-ground effect}
,volume={2}
, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0179}, DOI={10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0179}
, number= {2}
, journal={International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering}
, publisher={The Society of Naval Architects of Korea}
, author={Kinaci, Omer Kemal}
, year={2014}
, month={Jun}