Advanced
Performance Analysis of Amplify and Forward (AF)-based Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks
Performance Analysis of Amplify and Forward (AF)-based Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks
Journal of information and communication convergence engineering. 2013. Dec, 11(4): 223-228
Copyright ©2013, The Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Engineering
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/li-censes/bync/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Received : April 25, 2013
  • Accepted : August 09, 2013
  • Published : December 31, 2013
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Muhammad Sajjad Khan
Insoo Koo
iskoo@ulsan.ac.kr

Abstract
Cognitive radio has been recently considered a promising technology to improve spectrum utilization by enabling secondary access to licensed bands that are not used by primary users temporarily or spatially. A prerequisite to this secondary access is the lack of interference to the primary system. This requirement makes spectrum sensing a key process for cognitive radio. In this study, we consider amplify and forward (AF)-based cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radio networks where multiple relay nodes are utilized to amplify and forward the primary user signal for better spectrum sensing, and maximum ratio combining is used for fusion detection by a cognitive coordinator. Further, the detection probability and the bit error rate of AF-based cooperative spectrum sensing are analyzed in fading multiple cognitive relay channels. The simulation results show that the AF-based cooperative spectrum sensing scheme outperforms the conventional scheme.
Keywords
I. INTRODUCTION
In wireless communication, spectrum utilization plays a vital role. A spectrum is shared by a licensed user (primary user [PU]); however, most of the time the spectrum remains under-utilized, particularly in the case of a television (TV) band.
Cognitive radio provides an excellent solution to this spectrum scarcity problem by utilizing the under-utilized bands, in which unlicensed users (secondary users [SUs]) access and utilize the spectrum when the PU is not present. The key features of a cognitive transceiver are radio environment awareness and spectrum intelligence [1] . Intelligence can be achieved by learning the spectrum environment and adapting the transmission parameters. For instance, SU attempts to detect the activities of PU, and if there are no PU activities, then SU gets access to the spectrum such that dynamic spectrum access can be achieved [2 - 5] .
However, realization of the cognitive radio requires a strong guarantee of no interference to the licensed user. This motivates research on spectrum sensing and related technologies. At present, local spectrum sensing does not meet the requirement of reliable detection of the PU because of its limitations in the fading environment [6] .
Therefore, cooperative spectrum sensing is introduced as a key to reduce the probability of interference to legacy systems [7] . Traditionally, three methods are used for performing spectrum sensing [8] : energy detection (noncoherent detection through received energy), matched filter (coherent detection through maximization of signal-to-noise ratio [SNR]), and cyclostationary feature detection (exploitation of the inherent periodicity of the primary signal). Among them, the energy detector is the most popular method. To improve the spectrum sensing accuracy, cooperative sensing makes use of the information exchange among SUs.
In [9] , a two-user cooperative model is compared with non-cooperative systems. Detection probability is increased while the sensing time is decreased by 35%, which is important for long-term sensing. Further, Atapattu et al. [10] evaluated the performance of the energy detector in a Rayleigh fading channel and demonstrated a reduction of both the detection probability and the false-alarm probability.
In this study, we consider amplify and forward (AF)-based cooperative spectrum sensing in a cognitive radio network where multiple relay nodes are utilized to amplify and forward the primary user signal for better spectrum sensing, and maximal ratio combining is used for fusion detection by a cognitive coordinator. We also analyze the probability of detection and the bit error rate (BER) of the AF-based cooperative spectrum sensing. The simulation results show that the AF-based cooperative spectrum scheme outperforms the conventional scheme.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: In Section II, we describe the proposed system model. In Section III, we analyze the detection probability and the BER of AFbased cooperative spectrum sensing. In Section IV, we present the simulation and numerical results. Finally, we draw conclusions in Section V.
II. SYSTEM MODEL
- A. Channel Model
A wireless network is assumed to cooperate over an independent and not necessarily identically distributed Rayleigh fading channel. Let hpucc be the fading for the PU → CC link; the magnitude of hpucc is calculated using the probability density function (pdf) as follows [11] :
Lager Image
where E (| hpucc )| 2 ) = 1 and E (.) denotes the expectation.
Additive white Gaussian noise, denoted by wpu at node PU, is assumed to be a circulatory symmetric complex Gaussian random variable with a zero mean and variance N0 such that we have wpu ~ CN (0, N0 ).
- B. AF-based Cooperative Spectrum Sensing
In AF-based cooperative spectrum sensing, relays receive information from the PU, and then amplify and forward this information to the cognitive coordinator by using the AF relay protocol. The relay nodes amplify both information and noise. The cognitive coordinator (fusion center) uses the energy detector method to decide the presence or absence of the PU by comparing with the detection threshold value.
Let us consider the model illustrated in Fig. 1 ; it has n cognitive relays, i.e., ( r 1 , r 2 , r 3 , … r n ), where all the relay nodes listen to the PU when the PU starts using the spectrum. Instead of taking the decision about the presence or absence of the PU, the relays just amplify and forward the PU’s signal to the cognitive coordinator. In order to avoid the inter-channel interference, communication between relays and the cognitive coordinator should be orthogonal. For example, the cognitive coordinator may use time division multiple access (TDMA) to receive a signal from the PU and cognitive relays.
The cognitive coordinator combines all signals using maximal ratio combining (MRC), compares the output of the energy detector with the threshold value, and decides on the presence or absence of the PU. In the next subsection, single and multiple cognitive relays are discussed.
- 1) Single Cognitive Relay Communication
Single cognitive relay communication consists of the PU, a cognitive relay node, and a cognitive coordinator. The signal received by the cognitive relay ypur = θxhpur + wr where θ shows the PU action, θ = 1 PU present or θ = 0 PU absent; x denotes the transmitted signal from the PU. hpur denotes the channel gain between the PU and the cognitive relay, and wr represents the noise at the cognitive relay and has a transmission power of Ec . The amplification factor αr denotes the power transmitted for the PU, as follows:
Lager Image
Lager Image
Cooperative network with cognitive relays.
Now, the received power at the cognitive coordinator is
Lager Image
For the energy detector, we use the signal squaring method. The detector at the cognitive coordinator uses a binary hypothesis such that we have
Lager Image
The output of the signal squaring method Y is used for solving the pdf of y as follows [6] :
Lager Image
where Γ(.) denotes the gamma function, In (.) represents the n th -order modified Bessel function of the first type, and u = TW , where T and W are chosen to restrict u to an integer value. The total end-to-end SNR, denoted by γ is calculated as follows [12] :
Lager Image
where
Lager Image
denote the SNR of the link from the PU to the relay node, and from the relay node to the cognitive coordinator, respectively.
- 2) Multiple Cognitive Relay Communication
In multiple cognitive relay communication, there are n cognitive relay nodes, the PU, and the cognitive coordinator, as shown in Fig. 1 .
All the cognitive relay nodes receive the signal from the PU through an independent fading channel.
The amplification factor is calculated as
Lager Image
Each cognitive relay node amplifies the signal and forwards it to the cognitive coordinator. All cognitive relay nodes are orthogonal to each other and forward information to the cognitive coordinator. Further, such an orthogonal channel can be realized by TDMA. The MRC ratio is used at the cognitive coordinator.
The SNR of γ is calculated as follows:
Lager Image
where γpuri and γricc represent the SNR from the PU to the relay nodes, and from the relay nodes to the cognitive coordinator, respectively.
However, the transmission between the PU and the cognitive coordinator can also take place by a direct link. The SNR of the cognitive coordinator and the single relay can be calculated as follows:
Lager Image
Further, the total SNR of the cognitive coordinator and the multiple relays can be calculated as follows:
Lager Image
III. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
In this section, we analyze the performance of AF-based cooperative spectrum sensing in terms of the average detection probability and the BER. To this end, we assume that the energy detection is used at the cognitive coordinator to make a decision regarding whether the PU is active or not, on the basis of the output of the energy detector, Y . The probability of detection ( pd ) and the probability of a false alarm ( pf ) are evaluated by using P ( Y > λ / H 1 ) and P ( Y > λ / H 0 ) , respectively. They further can be evaluated as follows [6] :
Lager Image
Lager Image
where QU (.,.) denotes the generalized Marcum Q-function and Γ(.,.) represents the upper incomplete gamma function, which is defined by the integral form
Lager Image
and Γ( a ,0) = Γ( a ).
- A. Average Detection Probability over a Fading Channel
The probability of a false alarm is independent of γ; thus, the probability of a false alarm over a fading channel can be calculated using Eq. (11). On the other hand, the probability of detection is a function of γ. Thus, the average probability of detection can be calculated by averaging Eq. (12) over the fading channel such that we have
Lager Image
where fY ( γ ) denotes the pdf of the SNR under fading.
For measuring fYAF ( γ ), we calculate the cumulative distribution function (CDF) and the pdf of γmin . Thus, CDF can be calculated as follows:
Lager Image
For calculating pdf, we take a derivative of Eq. (14), and we have
Lager Image
The pdf of γAF is an independent channel and can be expressed as follows [13] :
Lager Image
An alternative representation of the generalized Marcum Q-function can be expressed as follows [11] :
Lager Image
By substituting (16) and (17) in Eq. (13), we can calculate the average probability as follows:
Lager Image
This is the upper bound expression of AF-based cooperative spectrum sensing for average probability detection. When there is no relay cooperation, the average probability of detection for a direct link can be expressed as follows:
Lager Image
In the next section, we describe the BER analysis.
- B. Bit Error Rate Analysis
As the probability of detection increases, the BER at the cognitive coordinator decreases. The BER is calculated with MRC in a Rayleigh fading channel. The instantaneous equivalent end-to-end SNR is given in Eq. (5). The most vital feature of a cooperative relay is CDF. The CDF of the ith relay can be expressed as follows:
Lager Image
F ( γ ) denotes the outage probability evaluated at threshold γ; therefore, under the independent channel assumption of the joint CDF, we can express F ( γ ) as follows:
Lager Image
where F ( γi ) denotes the CDF of the ith path.
The conditional bit error probability for different modulation schemes can be formulated as follows [11] :
Lager Image
where Q (.) denotes the Gaussian Q-function and c represents the constant determined by the modulation scheme. For example, c = 2 in the case of binary phase shift keying. Therefore, the average BER (ABER) is defined as follows:
Lager Image
where p ( γ ) denotes the joint pdf of the instantaneous SNR for the sequence γi , and i = 1, …, M .
Under the independent channel assumption and by using Eq. (21), we can express the joint pdf in terms of the joint CDF as follows:
Lager Image
By substituting (22) in (23), we can express the ABER as follows:
Lager Image
IV. SIMULATION AND NUMERICAL RESULTS
In this section, we describe the simulation of the AF-based cooperative spectrum sensing scheme for the probability of detection and BER. The Rayleigh fading channel and MRC are simulated in MATLAB for calculating the probability of detection and the BER. We have simulated the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for the detection of the probability of AF-based cooperative spectrum sensing with different values of the amplification factor.
From Fig. 2 , it can be observed that the detection probability increases with an increase in the amplification. Figs. 3 and 4 depict the BER analysis with SNR for direct (noncooperative) and cooperative links with different amplification factors. The BER decreases with an increase in the amplification factor. Further, with an increase in the amplification factor, the probability of detection increases.
In the BER analysis, it can be observed from the figures that the BER decreases with an increase in the amplification factor. However, keeping in view the tradeoff between the amplification factor and the power, the amplification factor should not be very high.
Lager Image
Receiver operating characteristic curve of amplify and forwardcooperative spectrum sensing with different values of amplification factor(AF), α.
Lager Image
Bit error rate of non-cooperative link and amplify and forwardrelay when amplification factor (AF) is 2.
Lager Image
Bit error rate of non-cooperative link and amplify and forwardrelay when amplification factor (AF) is 3.
V. CONCLUSION
In this study, the performance of AF-based cooperative spectrum sensing was investigated in terms of the detection probability and the BER. It was observed that the cooperative relay played a vital role in improving the performance of the detection of the PU in an environment with the most interference; this directly affected the BER, which was an important factor for the sensing and transmission.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a National ResearchFoundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Koreangovernment (NRF-2013R1A2A2A05004535 and NRF-2012R1A1A2038831).
References
Haykin S. 2005 “Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 23 (2) 201 - 220    DOI : 10.1109/JSAC.2004.839380
Jiang H. , Lai L. , Fan R. , Poo H. V. 2009 “Optimal selection of channel sensing order in cognitive radio” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 8 (1) 297 - 307    DOI : 10.1109/T-WC.2009.071363
Zhao Q. , Tong L. , Swami A. , Chen Y. 2007 “Decentralizedcognitive MAC for opportunistic spectrum access in ad hocnetworks: a POMDP framework” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 25 (3) 589 - 600    DOI : 10.1109/JSAC.2007.070409
Fan R. , Jiang H. 2009 “Channel sensing-order setting in cognitiveradio networks: a two-user case” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 58 (9) 4997 - 5008    DOI : 10.1109/TVT.2009.2027712
Han Z. , Fan R. , Jiang H. 2009 “Replacement of spectrum sensingin cognitive radio” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 8 (6) 2819 - 2826    DOI : 10.1109/TWC.2009.080603
Digham F. F. , Alouini M. S. , Simon M. K. 2003 “On the energy detection of unknown signals over fading channels” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications Anchorage: AK 3575 - 3579
Chen X. , Bie Z. S. , Wu W. L. 2008 “Detection efficiency of cooperativespectrum sensing in cognitive radio network” Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications 15 (3) 1 - 7    DOI : 10.1016/S1005-8885(08)60098-9
Cabric C. , Mishra S. M. , Brodersen R. W. 2004 “Implementationissues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios” in Conference Record of the 38th Asilomar Conference on Signal, Systems & Computers Pacific Grove: CA 772 - 776
Ganesan G. , Li Y. 2005 “Agility improvement through cooperativediversity in cognitive radio” in Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference St. Louis: MO 2505 - 2509
Atapattu S. , Tellambura C. , Jiang H. 2009 “Relay based cooperativespectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks” in Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference Honolulu: HI 1 - 5
Simon M. K. , Alouini M. S. 2005 Digital Communication overFading Channels 2nd ed Wiley New York, NY
Laneman J. N. , Tse D. N. C. , Wornell G. W. 2004 “Cooperativediversity in wireless networks: efficient protocols and outagebehavior” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 50 (12) 3062 - 3080    DOI : 10.1109/TIT.2004.838089
Papoulis A. , Pillai S. U. 2002 Probability, Random Variables andStochastic Process 4th ed McGraw-Hill New York, NY