Advanced
Detection of Mycobacterium kansasii Using DNA-DNA Hybridization with rpoB Probe
Detection of Mycobacterium kansasii Using DNA-DNA Hybridization with rpoB Probe
Journal of information and communication convergence engineering. 2012. Jun, 10(2): 210-214
Copyright ©2012, The Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Engineering
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/li-censes/bync/ 3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Received : April 09, 2012
  • Accepted : May 09, 2012
  • Published : June 30, 2012
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Tae-Dong Kweon
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-749, Korea
Sun-Joon Bai
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-749, Korea
Chang-Shik Choi
Department of Oriental Medicine Resources, Far East University, Eumseong 369-700, Korea
Seong-Karp Hong
Division of Bio and Health Sciences, Mokwon University, Daejeon 302-729, Korea
karp@mokwon.ac.kr

Abstract
A microtiter well plate DNA hybridization method using Mycobacterium kansasii -specific rpoB DNA probe (kanp) were evaluated for the detection of M. kansasii from culture isolates. Among the 201 isolates tested by this method, 27 strains show positive results for M. kansasii , but the other 174 isolates were negative results for M. kansasii . This result was consistent with partial rpoB sequence analysis of M. kansasii and the result of biochemical tests. The negative strains by this DNA-DNA hybridization method were identified as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (159 strains), Mycobacterium avim (5 strains), Mycobacterium intracellulare (8 strains), and Mycobacterium flavescens (2 strain) by rpoB DNA sequence analysis. Due to high sensitivity and specificity of this test result, we suggest that DNA-DNA hybridization method using rpoB DNA probes of M. kansasii could be used for the rapid and convenient detection of M. kansasii .
Keywords
I. INTRODUCTION
Mycobacterium kansasii has been considerably pathogenic mycobacteria causing various human diseases with nontuberculous mycobacteria containing M. avium and M. intracellulare . It is the most common cause of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease in Europe [1 , 2] . Detection and identification of mycobacteria is very important for epidemiological survey of disease and adequate drug use. Conventionally identification methods of mycobacteria are mainly biochemical tests of acid-fast isolates. These methods are not economical in view of time and expense. Lately, many molecular approaches for the identification of mycobacteria have been developed. Among them, The INNO-LiPA MYCOBACTERIA assay (LiPA; Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium) using 16S–23S internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region is very specific and sensitive [3] . However, it is hard to identify some mycobacteria and has not yet been fully evaluated. Besides identification of mycobacteria using 16S rRNA gene, ITS, hsp65, sodA, and are sensitive and specific, but are too expensive [4] .
In this study, novel M. kansasii -specific probe derived from rpoB was used to separately detect M. kansasii from 201 mycobacteria isolates.
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS
- A. Bacteria Strains and DNA Preparations
Clinical isolates used in this study were provided by the Korean Institute of Tuberculosis and Department of Clinical Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital. Mycobacterial DNA samples were prepared by the bead beater-phenol extraction method [5] .
- B. Amplication of DNA
A set of primers, which was previously used to amplify rpoB DNA (351 bp) encompassing the rif r (region associated with rifampin resistance in Mycobacteria ) [5] , was labeled with biotin and designated BioMF (5’biotin- CGACCACTTCGGCAACCG3’) and BioMR (5’biotin- TCGATCGGGCACATCCGG3’). Template DNA (approximately 50 ng) and 20 pmol of each primer (BioMF and BioMR) were added to a PCR mixture tube (Accu- Power PCR PreMix; Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea) containing 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase, 250 μM dNTP, 50 mM Tris– HCl (pH 8.3), 40 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , and gel loading dye; the volume was then adjusted with distilled water to 20 μL. The reaction mixture was subjected to 30 cycles of amplification (5 minutes at 94℃, 1 minute at 95℃, 30 seconds at 68℃, 1 minute and 20 seconds at 72℃), and this was followed by a 10 minutes extension at 72℃.
- C. DNA Hybridization in a Microtiter Well Plate
DNA hybridization was performed as previously described [6] , with minor modification ( Fig. 1 ). Briefly, a oligonucleotide-specific probe, kanp (5’-GCC-AGC-TCTCCC- AGT-TCA-3’) was designed from the known rpoB sequences of M. kansasii [5] .
Five picomoles of the probe DNAs was dissolved in 50 μL of immobilization buffer (1.5 M NaCl, 0.3 M Tris–HCl [pH 8.0], 0.3 M MgCl 2 ) and then dispensed into a microtiter well (NucleoLink Strips; Nunc, Rochester, NY, USA) and incubated over night at 37℃. The probe DNA mixture was then removed from the well and dried at 37℃ for 30 min. Wells were UV irradiated at 254 nm, for 5 minutes using an electronic UV crosslinker CEX-800 (Ultra-Lum, Claremont, CA, USA) and washed three times with 200 μL of washing buffer (1 M NaCl, 0.1 M Tris–HCl [pH 9.3], 2 mM MgCl 2 , 0.1% Tween 20). Probe-coated wells was immediately stored at 4℃ and used for hybridization. One hundred microliters of hybridization solution (5 × SSC, 5 × Denhardt’s, 0.2% SDS, and 200 μg/mL of salmon sperm DNA) was dispensed into a probe-coated micro-titer well. Five microliters of the heat-denatured PCR product was mixed with the hybridization solution and incubated in the well for 30 minutes at 50℃. The mixture was then removed from the well, which was rinsed three times with 200 μL of 2 × SSC. One hundred microliters of alkaline phosphataseconjugated streptavidin solution (Amersham Life Science, Arlington Heights, IL, USA), diluted 1:2000 with incubation solution (0.3 M NaCl, 0.1 M Tris–HCl [pH 7.5] 2 mM MgCl 2 , 0.05% Triton X-100), was then added to the well, and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. After incubation, the well was rinsed three times with 200 μL of incubation solution, then 100 μL of 1 M diethanolamine buffer (pH 9.8) containing 0.5 mM MgCl 2 and 10 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate was added, and the whole solution was kept at room temperature for 60 min. The enzyme reaction was stopped using 5 μL of 10 M NaOH and the optical density at 405 nm (OD 405 ) of each well was read using a micro-titer plate reader (Multiskan Ascent; Labsystems, Grand Rapids, OH, USA). The OD 405 values of triplicated wells were use to draw a bar graph using SigmaPlot 2000 (Ver. 6.00) (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).
PPT Slide
Lager Image
DNA-DNA hybridization method using kanp probe in microtiter well plate.
- D. Nucleotide Sequencing
The nucleotide sequences of the purified PCR products were directly determined as previously described [1] .
For the sequencing reaction, 60 ng of PCR amplified DNAs, which were purified using a QIAEX II gel extraction kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), 5 pmol of either the forward or the reverse primer, and 4 μL of BigDye Terminator v2.0 100 RR mix (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) were mixed, and the contents were adjusted to a final volume of 10 μL with distilled water. The reaction was run for 30 cycles of 10 seconds at 96℃, 5 seconds at 60℃, and 4 minutes at 60℃. Both strands were sequenced as a crosscheck. Determined sequences were compared with those of reference strains in GenBank to compare sequence similarities.
III. RESULTS
This specific oligonucleotide probe, kanp probe, for M. kansasii were designed by basis on M. kansasii specific rpoB nucleotide sequence not found in other species of Mycobacterium. The OD 405 increased, depending on the concentration of coated this probe and its optimal concentration was evaluated at 5 pmol/well ( Fig. 2 ). The average cut-off value of the colorimetric reaction was determined using the amplified rpoB DNAs of M. kansasii , which had been previously identified using culture-based methods.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Determination of concentration of kanp probe in a well by DNA-DNA hybridization.
This probe also was proved to be specific in terms of the amplification of the rpoB DNA of M. kansasii by PCRlinked DNA-DNA hybridization test ( Fig. 3 ).
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Identification of M. kansasii from subtypes (I, II, III, IV, V, and VI) of M. kansasii by DNA-DNA hybridization with kanp probe.
This probe was specific for subtype I, II, IV, and V of M. kansasii . There is no problem for detection and identification of M. kansasii from clinical samples because clinical pathogens are subtype I, and II of M. kansasii .
DNA-DNA hybridization test for detection and identification of M. kansasii , the average OD 405 for positive samples ( n = 30) was 1.25 ± 0.32 and that of negative samples ( n = 152) was 0.03 ± 0.02. Thus, the cut off value for hybridization test using kanp probe were set at 0.2. Reference strains other than members of the M. kansasii did not react with probes coated onto a micro-titer well plate. The DNA-DNA hybridization test was also performed with 201 clinical culture samples. Positive reactions, which mean M. kansasii were clearly identified. When kanp probe was used in DNA-DNA hybridization test, of the 201 strains, 27 strains (13.4%) produced positive results and 174 strains (86.6%) were negative ( Table 1 ).
Comparision of the results obtained by DNA-DNA hybridization method and other methods for identification of M. kansasii
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Comparision of the results obtained by DNA-DNA hybridization method and other methods for identification of M. kansasii
The sensitivity and specificity of this DNA hybridization method performed with culture samples was 100%. The negative strains by this DNA hybridization method were identified as M. tuberculosis (159 strains), M. avium (5 strains), M. intracellulare (8 strains), and M. flavescens (2 strain) by rpoB DNA sequence analysis.
IV. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
There have been developed many diagnostic methods for mycobacterial infections containing conventional culture methods, PCR-based methods, and liquid culturebased mycobacterial detection systems, such the Bactec [7] , MGIT [8] , ESP [9] , and BacT/Alert 3D [10] . There are many PCR-linked methods using 16S rRNA gene [11 - 14] and 16S–23S rRNA spacer region [3 , 14] in mycobacteria. However, despite these efforts, a good standard protocol for detection and identification of M. kansasii has not yet been established because of various subtypes of M. kansasii .
In this study, we suggest that this DNA-DNA hybridization method assay using M. kansasii -specific rpoB DNA prob, kanp probe, could be useful for a rapid and precise detection for M. kansasii .
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011-0014780) and (2011-0024912).
References
Bloch K. C. , Zwerlin L. , Pletcher M. J. , Hahn J. A. , Gerberding J. L. , Ostroff S. M. , Vugia D. J. , Reingold A. L. 1998 “Incidence and clinical implications of isolation of Mycobacterium kansasii: results of a 5-year, population-based study” Annals of Internal Medicine 129 (9) 698 - 704
Evans A. J. , Crisp A. J. , Hubbard R. B. , Colville A. , Evans S. A. , Johnston I. D. 1996 “Pulmonary Mycobacterium kansasii infection: comparison of radiological appearances with pulmonary tuberculosis” Thorax 51 (12) 1243 - 1247
Tortoli E. , Mariottini A. , Mazzarelli G. 2003 “Evaluation of INNOLiPA MYCOBACTERIA v2: improved reverse hybridization multiple DNA probe assay for mycobacterial identification” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 41 (9) 4418 - 4420
Sajduda A. , Martin A. , Portaels F. , Palomino J. C. 2012 “hsp65 PCR-restriction analysis (PRA) with capillary electrophoresis for species identification and differentiation of Mycobacterium kansasii and Mycobacterium chelonae-Mycobacterium abscessus group” International Journal of Infectious Diseases 16 (3) 193 - 197
Kim B. J. , Lee S. H. , Lyu M. A. , Kim S. J. , Bai G. H. , Chae G. T. , Kim E. C. , Cha C. Y. , Kook Y. H. 1999 “Identification of mycobacterial species by comparative sequence analysis of the RNA polymerase gene (rpoB)” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37 (6) 1714 - 1720
Hong S. K. , Kim B. J. , Yun Y. J. , Lee K. H. , Kim E. C. , Park E. M. , Park Y. G. , Bai G. H. , Kook K. H. 2004 “Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by PCR-linked reverse hybridization using specific rpoB oligonucleotide probes” Journal of Microbiological Methods 59 (1) 71 - 79
Hillemann D. , Richter E. , Rusch-Gerdes S. 2006 “Use of the BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube 960 automated system for recovery of Mycobacteria from 9,558 extrapulmonary specimens, including urine samples” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 44 (11) 4014 - 1017
Badak F. Z. , Kiska D. L. , O'Connell M. , Nycz C. M. , Hartley C. , Setterquist S. , Hopfer R. L. 1997 Confirmation of the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other mycobacteria in mycobacterial growth indicator tubes (MGIT) by multiplex strand displacement amplification” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 35 (5) 1239 - 1243
Williams-Bouyer N. , Yorke R. , Lee H. I. , Woods G. L. 2000 “Comparison of the BACTEC MGIT 960 and ESP culture system II for growth and detection of mycobacteria” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 38 (11) 4167 - 4170
Carricajo A. , Fonsale N. , Vautrin A. C. , Aubert G. 2001 “Evaluation of BacT/Alert 3D liquid culture system for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens using sodium dodecyl (lauryl) sulfate-NaOH decontamination” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 39 (10) 3799 - 3800
Tevere V. J. , Hewitt P. L. , Dare A. , Hocknell P. , Keen A. , Spadoro J. P. , Young K. K. 1996 “Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by PCR amplification with pan-Mycobacterium primers and hybridization to an M. tuberculosis-specific probe” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34 (4) 918 - 923
Portaels F. , Agular J. , Fissette K. , Fonteyne P. A. , de Beenhouwer H. , de Rijk P. , Guedenon A. , Lemans R. , Steunou C. , Zinsou C. , Dumonceau J. M. , Meyers W. M. 1997 Journal of Clinical Microbiology 35 (5) 1097 - 1100
Stender H. , Lund K. , Petersen K. H. , Rasmussen O. F. , Hongmanee P. , Miorner H. , Godtfredsen S. E. 1999 “Fluorescence In situ hybridization assay using peptide nucleic acid probes for differentiation between tuberculous and nontuberculous mycobacterium species in smears of mycobacterium cultures” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37 (9) 2760 - 2765
Suffys P. N. , da Silva-Rocha A. , de Oliveira M. , Campos C. E. , Barreto A. M. , Portaels F. , Rigouts L. , Wouters G. , Jannes G. , van Reybroeck G. , Mijs W. , Vanderborght B. 2001 “Rapid identification of Mycobacteria to the species level using INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria, a reverse hybridization assay” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 39 (12) 4477 - 4482