Members of the ciliate group of protozoans are often observed in mass cultures of rotifers. In particular,
Euplotes
and
Vorticella
are common contaminating species. In this study, I examined the effect of the ciliates
Euplotes
sp. and
Vorticella
sp. on the growth of the rotifer
Brachionus rotundiformis
by conducting inter-specific and tripartite-specific mixed-culture experiments. The growth of rotifers was suppressed in co-existence with
Euplotes
sp. compared with monocultures of rotifers. However,
Vorticella
sp. promoted rotifer growth. Moreover,
Vorticella
sp. improved the growth of rotifers suppressed by
Euplotes
sp. contaminants. In 5-L semi-mass cultures of rotifers, growth of the contaminating protozoan
Euplotes
sp. was heavily suppressed by
Vorticella
sp. The stable maintenance of the rotifer culture ecosystem can be achieved by manipulating the types of contaminating protozoan species.
Introduction
Rotifers are a small type of zooplankton; however, in the world of aquaculture, rotifers are a very large object of attention by scientists and aquaculturists. The rotifer has been used for the seedling production of many economically important marine organisms, as it can be cultured at high densities. However, a very important unsolved problem remains: these cultures sometimes “crash” as characterized by a rapid and sudden population decrease in mass rotifer culture tanks. The cause of this phenomenon is not well known.
Marine rotifers of the genus
Brachionus
are widely used as live food for rearing early-stage larval marine fish. In mass cultures of rotifers, contamination by various organisms is commonly observed, and many of these contaminants can affect rotifer growth, e.g., copepods, protozoans, and anostracans (Hagiwara et al., 1995; Jung et al., 1997). Maeda and Hino (1991) examined the roles of contaminant protozoan species in rotifer mass-culture tanks. Reguera (1984) reported that a harmful ciliate in isolated rotifer mass-culture tanks reduced the population growth of the rotifer
B. plicatilis
and the alga
Dunaliella
(rotifer food) through food competition. Jung et al. (1997) reported that other protozoan species, with the exception of
Vorticella
sp., also reduced rotifer population growth.
The objectives of the present study were to artificially control the density of the ciliates
Euplotes
sp. and
Vorticella
sp. via competition in rotifer microcosms and to apply this bio-control method to the stable production of the rotifer
Brachionus rotundiformis
by adding
Vorticella
sp. to cultures. By applying tripartite-specific relationships and incorporating
Euplotes
sp. and
Vorticella
sp. into
B. rotundiformis
cultures, I aimed to develop more stable rotifer culturing techniques.
The experimental organisms of rotifer, Brachionus rotundiformis (A; 190 ± 20 μm) and two ciliates, Vorticella sp. (B; 70 ± 13 μm) and Euplotes sp. (C; 82 ± 16 μm).
Materials and Methods
- Experimental organisms
The test rotifer was
B. rotundiformis
of the Koshiki strain (
Fig. 1
A). The two most frequently observed contaminant protozoan species,
Vorticella
sp. (
Fig. 1
B) and
Euplotes
sp. (
Fig. 1
C), were isolated from rotifer mass-culture tanks. After collection, these organisms were maintained as monocultures in the laboratory. Culture conditions were 22 ppt salinity and 25℃ temperature. Food (centrifuged
Nannochloropsis oculata
) for the test organisms was maintained daily at about 7 × 10
5
cells/mL during the experimental period.
N. oculata
was cultured using modified Erd-Schreiber medium in an indoor culture room (Hagiwara et al., 1994). The genus of both test protozoans was identified in pure mono-species cultures (Inoki, 1981).
- Experimental designs
The study design, which focused on either the interspecific relationship between the rotifer and a protozoan (
Euplotes
sp. or
Vorticella
sp.) or the tripartite-specific relationship of the rotifer and both protozoans (
Euplotes
sp. and
Vorticella
sp.) species, was based on the methods of Jung et al. (1997). I examined the status of the coexistence of the two contaminating protozoans as well as on interspecific interactions between the two and the effect thereof on rotifer population growth.
Three treatments were implemented: 1) rotifers in singlespecies culture (SR); 2) two types of two-species mixed cultures (
B. rotundiformis
and
Euplotes
sp., SR + E;
B. rotundiformis
and
Vorticella
sp., SR + V); and 3) two types of tripartite mixed cultures (
Vorticella
sp. added at the start of cultures, SR + E + V;
Vorticella
sp. added 6 days after the start of cultures, SR + E/V).
Culture volumes of the small-scale experiment were 40-mL triplicates in 50-mL glass beakers (Pyrex). All beakers were covered with parafilm (American Can Co., Greenwich, CT, USA). Semi-mass cultures were maintained in 30-L polycarbonate round tanks with 5 L of culture water. Two types of culture water were used in the experiments: sterilized sea water diluted with distilled water for the small-scale experiment and natural sea water diluted with tap water for semi-mass cultures. In the 5-L semi-mass cultures, the formula for natural culture water (natural sea water diluted with tap water) followed the culture methods used in mass culture at sea farming centers.
The initial number of organisms was 20 amictic female
B. rotundiformis
and each five cells of the two protozoans,
Euplotes
sp. and
Vorticella
sp., per 40 mL for both experimental designs (small-scale 40-mL cultures and 5-L semi-mass cultures).
Both experiments were maintained in total darkness, except for observation times. The experimental culture period was 30 days. Every 6 days, the number of test organisms in three, 4-mL sub-samples per culture tank was counted for both experiments. After counting, all zooplankton species were returned to the experimental culture tanks.
- Statistical analysis
Results were analyzed using
t
-tests with a 95% confidence level.
Results
No predator-prey interactions were observed between the rotifer,
B. rotundiformis
(190 ± 20 μm) (
Fig. 1
A) and the two ciliates,
Vorticella
sp. (70 ± 13 μm) (
Fig. 1
B) and
Euplotes
sp. (82 ± 16 μm) (
Fig. 1
C) or between the two experimental ciliates.
In the small-scale 40-mL cultures, the growth of rotifers was clearly suppressed when
Euplotes
sp. was present (SR + E) (
Fig. 2
) compared with the ciliate-free rotifer cultures (SR) (
Fig. 2
). However, the addition of
Vorticella
sp. (SR + V) increased rotifer growth by 2.1 times compared with that observed in the
Euplotes
sp. contaminated cultures (
P
< 0.01) (
Fig. 2
). In two of the three-species tripartite mixed cultures (SR + E/V and SR + E + V), no declines in rotifer population growth were observed relative to the ciliate-free rotifer culture or to the mixed cultures of rotifers and
Euplotes
sp. (
P
< 0.05) (
Fig. 2
).
The population growth of each ciliate,
i.e., Euplotes
sp. and
Vorticella
sp., interfered with that of the other (
Figs. 3
,
4
). The density of
Euplotes
sp. rapidly increased in cultures with only the rotifer compared with conditions of co-existence with
Vorticella
sp. Additionally,
Vorticella
sp. grew quickly in mixed cultures with only the rotifer compared with tripartite mixed cultures including
Euplotes
sp. (
Fig. 4
).
When
Vorticella
sp. was artificially added to the 5-L semimass culture tanks of rotifers, this ciliate heavily suppressed the growth of the contaminating protozoan species (
Euplotes
sp.) by 0.1 times compared with
Vorticella
sp.-free cultures (
P
< 0.01) (
Fig. 5
). In contrast, rotifer population growth was not suppressed and was even marginally increased by 1.1 times the growth observed in ciliate-free rotifer cultures (
Fig. 6
).
Discussion
The present study examined the interspecific relationships between two zooplankton species within microcosms. Moreover, the micro-ecological tripartite-specific relationships of three zooplankton species were also investigated. Previous studies have examined similar multi-species relationships within microcosms. For example, Kawabata et al. (1995) achieved long-term cultures of species-defined microcosms using
Escherichia coli
DH5a as a decomposer bacteria,
Tetrahymena thermophila
B as a consumer protozoa, and
Euglena gracilis
Z as the producer algae under artificial culture medium conditions. This artificial small microcosm was successfully maintained as a stable ecological system in a micro-community (Kawabata et al., 1995).
The present results demonstrate the potential for co-existence of as well as the interspecific relationships between two contaminating protozoan ciliate species (
Euplotes
sp. and
Vorticella
sp.). These interspecific interactions directly or indirectly affected the population growth of a rotifer species,
B. rotundiformis
, within the same culture community. Pace and Orcutt (1981) also examined the function of protozoans in living environmental communities, demonstrating that a population of crustaceans declined but those of protozoans and a rotifer increased when cultured together. Pierce and Turner (1992) documented the importance of marine planktonic ciliates as consumers within a tropical link system and as a vector
Number of rotifer, Brachionus rotundiformis in single, inter- and tripartite specific cultures. Rotifer single species culture as control (○), mixed culture with Euplotes sp. (□), mixed culture with Vorticella sp. (◇), mixed culture of three species, B. rotundiformis, Euplotes sp. and Vorticella sp. with the addition of Vorticella sp. on day 0 (×) and on day 6 (△). Each plot and vertical bars represent mean ± SD of three replicates.
Number of Euplotes sp. in inter- and tripartite specific cultures. Mixed culture of Brachionus rotundiformis and Euplotes sp. (□), mixed culture of three species, B. rotundiformis, Euplotes sp. and Vorticella sp. with the addition of Vorticella sp. on day 0 (×) and on day 6 (△). Each plot and vertical bars represent mean ± SD of three replicates.
Number of Vorticllea sp. in inter- and tripartite specific cultures. Mixed culture of Brachionus rotundiformis and Vorticella sp. (◇), mixed culture of three species, B. rotundiformis, Euplotes sp. and Vorticella sp. with the addition of Vorticella sp. on day 0 (×) and on day 6 (△). Each plot and vertical bars represent mean ± SD of three replicates.
Number of contamination protozoans with Vorticella sp. (■) and without (□) Vorticella sp. in the 5 L semi-mass culture.
of energy flow through pelagic marine ecosystems. Hamilton and Preslan (1969) examined the optimal conditions of ciliate growth in terms of feeding behavior and food (bacteria) concentration.
During the experiments, no predator-prey interactions were observed between the rotifer (190 ± 20 μm) (
Fig. 1
A) and either of the two test ciliates,
Vorticella
sp. (70 ± 13 μm) (
Fig. 1
B) and
Euplotes
sp. (82 ± 16 μm) (
Fig. 1
C). In contrast, Gilbert and Jack (1993) showed that
Synchaeta pectinata
(320 μm),
Brachionus calyciflorus
(280 μm), and
Asplanchna girodi
(491 μm) were effective predators of ciliates (45-60 μm), ingesting up to 50 ciliates rotifer
-1
day
-1
.
The common contaminating ciliate,
Euplotes
sp., always interferes with the stability of rotifer mass cultures in culture tanks (Jung et al., 1997, 2008). Jung et al. (1997) showed that all contaminating ciliates, except for
Vorticella
sp., suppressed rotifer population growth. The present results indicate that one method for suppressing
Euplotes
sp. populations within cultures is to utilize the bacterivorous ciliate
Vorticella
sp. to induce food (bacteria) competition between
Euplotes
sp. and
Vorticella
sp. Generally, ciliate groups feed on bacteria. As a result, rotifer population growth is directly and indirectly improved due to declines in harmful
Euplotes
sp. caused by food (aquatic bacteria) competition with
Vorticella
sp.
Euplotes
sp. competes for the same food (centrifuged and condensed instant microalgae) as the marine
Brachionus
rotifer within the same culture tanks (Jung et al., 2008). Furthermore, an isolated bacteria group (
Flavobacterium
) in
Euplotes
-contaminated rotifer culture tanks can also strongly suppress rotifer growth (Maeda and Hino, 1991). Thus,
Vorticella
may experience rapid growth in
Euplotes
-contaminated tanks by utilizing these bacteria as a food source.
The present study presents a very interesting phase of rotifer
Number of rotifer, Brachionus rotundiformis with Vorticella sp. (■) and without Vorticella sp. (□) in the 5 L semi-mass culture.
microcosms. In the experimental microcosms, intricate relationships between two protozoans, namely inter- and tripartite-specific interactions, caused direct and indirect effects on rotifer population growth. Moreover, the
Vorticella
sp. contaminant was very useful as an aquatic ecosystem control tool. These results demonstrate the value of
Vorticella
sp. for maintaining the stable production of rotifer mass cultures.
Acknowledgements
I am indebted to Dr. Cheng-Sheng Lee (Center for Tropical and Subtropical Aquaculture, The Oceanic Institute in Hawaii, USA) and Mr. Diegane Ndong (Agence Nationale De L’Aquaculture, Senegal). Also I would like to thank to professional translator, Mr. Do Eungbeom for grammar correction of English. This work is also funded by National Fisheries Research & Development Institute of South Korea (NFRDI, RP-2012-AQ-060).
Gilbert JJ
,
Jack JD
1993
Rotifers as predators on small ciliates.
Hydrobiologia
255/256
247 -
253
Hagiwara A
,
Hamada K
,
Hori S
,
Hirayama K
1994
Increased sexual reproduction in Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera) with the addition of bacteria and rotifer extracts.
J Exp Mar Biol Ecol
181
1 -
8
Hagiwara A
,
Jung MM
,
Sato T
,
Hirayama K
1995
Interspecific relations between marine rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis and zooplankton species contaminating in the rotifer mass culture tank.
Fish Sci
61
623 -
627
Hamilton RD
,
Preslan JE
1969
Cultural characteristics of a pelagic marine Hymenostome ciliate, Uronema sp.
J Exp Mar Biol Ecol
4
90 -
99
Inoki S
1981
An Illustrated of the Protozoa.
Kodansha Publishing
Tokyo, JP
Jung MM
,
Hagiwara A
,
Hirayama K
1997
Interspecific interactions in the marine rotifer microcosm.
Hydrobiologia
358
121 -
126
Jung MM
,
Moon TS
,
Kim HS
,
Ji YJ
2008
Role of contaminant a ciliate Euplotes (Ciliate, Protozoa) in the rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis culture tanks.
J Aquac
21
167 -
171
Kawabata Z
,
Matsui K
,
Okazaki K
,
Nasu M
,
Nakano N
,
Sugai T
1995
Synthesis of a species-defined microcosm with protozoa.
J Protozool Res
5
23 -
26
Maeda M
,
Hino A
,
Fulls W
,
Main KL
1991
Environmental management for mass culture of the rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis. Rotifer and microalgae culture systems.
The Oceanic Institute
In: Proceeding of a U.S.-Asia Workshop.
Honolulu, HI, US
125 -
133
Pace ML
,
Orcutt JD
1981
The relative importance of protozoans, rotifers, and crustaceans in a freshwater zooplankton community.
Limnol Oceanogr
26
822 -
830
Pierce RW
,
Turner JT
1992
Ecology of planktonic ciliates in marine food webs.
Rev Aquat Sci
6
139 -
181
Reguera B
1984
The effect of ciliate contamination in mass cultures of the rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis O. F. Müller.
Aquaculture
40
103 -
108