Survival Strategies of the Rotifer <italic>Brachionus rotundiformis</italic> for Coexisting with the Copepod <italic>Apocyclops borneoensis</italic> in Laboratory Culture
Survival Strategies of the Rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis for Coexisting with the Copepod Apocyclops borneoensis in Laboratory Culture
Fisheries and aquatic sciences. 2012. Mar, 15(1): 57-62
Copyright ©2012, The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Received : July 07, 2011
  • Accepted : February 02, 2012
  • Published : March 30, 2012
Export by style
Cited by
About the Authors
Min-min Jung
Interspecific relationship between a euryhaline rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis and a cyclopoid copepod Apocyclops borneoen-sis was investigated in the laboratory culture. In a mixed culture of B. rotundiformis and A. borneoensis , population growth of B. rotundiformis was suppressed from day 10, while growth in a monoculture population continuously increased throughout the experimental period. However, the population growth of A. borneoensis in the mixed culture did not markedly differ from that in a monoculture population. Suppression of B. rotundiformis growth coincided with a decrease in the numbers of both non-egg-bearing and egg-bearing females, and increasing resting egg formation. Growth of A. borneoensis was not affected by the presence of the rotifer. However, relative growth index of ovisac bearing females in the mixed culture was 1.62 times higher than that in the monoculture. Presence of the copepod did not greatly reduce the food available to the rotifer population. The rotifer B. rotun-diformis responded in a unique way, to stresses such as physical damage (filtering by A. borneoensis ) with the production of many resting eggs to increase its chances of survival.
Rotifers are some of the most important zooplankton, and are the focus of much attention from aquaculture scientists. Rotifers have been used as a primary live food for the seedling production of many economically important marine animals, because rotifers can be easily cultured at high densities. Stable mass culture of rotifers is needed for successful fish larval rearing. A variety of mass culture methods should be devel-oped to facilitate successful aquatic animal culture through stable live food organism production. However, the instability or sudden crashes of rotifer mass cultures remain problematic. The causes of such culture failures are not fully understood, although it is predicted that one major cause is contamina-tion by other organisms such as protozoa (Takayama, 1979; Reguera, 1984; Chen et al., 1997), copepods (Fukusho et al., 1976) and bacteria (Yu et al., 1990).
Coexing populations of different taxonomic groups depend on the organisms that occur together in space and time, and interact with each other through the processes of mutualism, parasitism, predation and competition (Begon et al., 1990). The relationships between Brachionus rotundiformis and other zooplankton species have been well examined (Gilbert and Stemberger, 1985; Gilbert, 1988; Hagiwara et al., 1995a; Jung et al., 1997), and competitive interference has been re-ported between rotifers and cladocera in fresh water. Under marine culture conditions, there is considerable evidence for interspecific relationships between a rotifer, B. rotundiformis , and two species of copepods, Tigriopus japonicus and Acartia sp. (Jung et al., 1997).
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Experimental two organisms rotifer, Brachionus rotundiformis (A) and copepod, Apocyclops borneoensis (B) and interspecific relationship between B. rotundiformis and A. borneoensis (C).
Copepods and rotifers coexist in estuaries as well as in brackish water fish culture ponds in North Sulawesi, Indone-sia. Of several copepod species collected, the only one that could be adapted to laboratory culture was Apocyclops bor-neoensis . It is unknown which species ( B. rotundiformis or A. borneoensis ) dominates earlier, or which is more susceptible to the rigorous conditions of the ponds. Therefore, it is of in-terest to examine the nature of the relationship between these two species. Such information is useful both for assessing their ecological significance in a brackish water ecosystem, as well as for establishing techniques for mono- and mixed-spe-cies cultures for aquaculture purposes as live food organisms.
Here, I observed, the survival strategies involved in the in-terspecific relationship between B. rotundiformis and A. bor-neoensis under laboratory experimental conditions. I focused on the interspecific interactions of the rotifer and the copepod from a microcosm viewpoint of aquaculture ecology.
Materials and Methods
Copepods and rotifers were collected from a milkfish pond in Bitung, 30 km east of Manado, North Sulawesi, Indonesia. The pond is separated from the adjacent sea by mangroves, but is connected through an inlet during high tide. Throughout the year, salinity of the pond varies from 12 to 25 psu and temperature ranges from 29℃ to 35℃.
The specimens were kept in darkness during a three-day acclimation culture to laboratory conditions before isolation. Various copepods were included in the sample, but only a cyclopoid copepod survived. The species was identified as Apocyclops borneoensis by Dr. H-S. Kim (Research Institute for Basic Science, Cheju National University of Korea). The rotifers were morphologically analyzed by Fu et al. (1991), and evidently belonged to an ultra minute strain of Brachionus rotundiformis (Hagiwara et al., 1995a). We refer this rotifer B. rotundiformis as a Bitung strain.
Experimental design and conditions used were the same as those described by Hagiwara et al. (1995b). Salinity, tempera-ture, and culture volume were 22 psu, 25℃ and 40 mL, re-spectively. The organisms were cultured in total darkness. The initial number of animals in mixed cultures was 20 females of the Bitung rotifer strain of B. rotundiformis and 3 ovisac-bearing females of A. borneoensis . In the monocultures, the numbers of rotifers and copepods were the same as in mixed cultures, but were cultured separately. Mono- and mixed-spe-cies cultures were conducted with three replicates for 16 days. Stereo-microscopic observation was carried out on fresh cul-ture medium including Tetraselmis suecica (7 × 10 5 cells/mL) every two days. Total number of test animals was counted and remaining algal food density was also counted by a haemacy-tometer (Kayagaki Irika Kogyo Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The algal food T. suecica , was grown in modified Erd-Schreiber medium (Hagiwara et al., 1994) and centrifuged. Density of food added was 7 × 10 5 cells/mL, and was readjusted every two days after observation.
For the observation and calculation of the rotifer mixis rate (%), all individual non-egg bearing fe-males, amictic females, unfertilized and fertilized mictic females, males and resting eggs were counted, and the mixis rate was calculated (Hagiwara et al., 1988). The numbers of all individual nauplii, copepodites and egg-bearing females of the copepod A. bor-neoensis were recorded. Relative population growths between monocultures of each species and mixed culture conditions were compared by student's t -test.
Predator-prey interactions were not observed during this experiment between the experimental rotifer B. rotundifor-mis and copepod A. borneoensis ( Fig. 1 A and 1 B). However,
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Densities of remaining food on the every two days in rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis mono culture (A), copepod Apocyclops borneoensis mono culture (B) and two species (rotifer and copepod) mixed culture (C).
distinct correlation interactions between the two experimental organisms were observed ( Fig. 1 C).
The remnant food ( T. suecica ) volumes under rotifer culture conditions significantly decreased with the lapse of experi-mental time compared to those in copepod monoculture con-dition ( P < 0.05) ( Fig. 2 A and 2 C), and almost all microalgae ( T. suecica ) cells were consumed. A remnant food volume of approximately 7 × 10 5 cells/mL was maintained under cope-pod monoculture conditions ( Fig. 2 B).
Population growth of rotifers in the mixed culture was sig-nificantly decreased ( P < 0.05) ( Fig. 3 ). Growth of rotifers was suppressed by the presence of copepods in the culture container. However, the population growth of rotifers in the monospecific culture continually increased ( Fig. 3 ).
In both experimental conditions, inductions of mixis rates (%) were observed. However, the mixis rate (%) of rotifers was notably changed by presence or absence of copepods. The difference between rotifer monoculture and mixed culture
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Population growth of rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis (Bitung strain) in the mono culture (white circles) and mixed culture with copepod Apocyclops borneoensis (black circles).
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Comparison of mixis rates in the rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis (Bitung strain) mono culture (white circles) and mixed culture with copepod Apocyclops borneoensis (black circles).
Comparison of production of rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis resting eggs in the rotifer mono culture and mixed culture with copepod Apocyclops borneoensis
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Comparison of production of rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis resting eggs in the rotifer mono culture and mixed culture with copepod Apocyclops borneoensis
with copepods was particularly notable on the 4th day ( Fig. 4 ). The presence of copepods influenced the mixis rate (%) of co-existing rotifers ( Fig. 4 ), as well as the production numbers of rotifer resting eggs. On day 4 of the observations, the highest values of mixis rates (%) was observed in both experimental conditions ( Fig. 4 ), and the production of rotifer resting eggs was observed from the 6th day. However, there were differ-ences in the numbers of rotifer resting eggs produced. More resting eggs were formed in the copepod mixed culture than in the rotifer monoculture ( P < 0.05) ( Fig. 5 ). A comparison of the production of rotifer resting eggs between rotifer mono-culture and mixed culture with copepods is shown in Table 1 .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Formed numbers of rotifer resting eggs in the rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis (Bitung strain) mono culture (white circles) and mixed culture with copepod Apocyclops borneoensis (black circles).
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Population growth of copepod Apocyclops borneoensis in the mono culture (white circles) and mixed culture with rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis (Bitung strain, black circles).
The production of rotifer resting eggs was 1.56 times higher in the mixed culture than in the rotifer monoculture ( P < 0.05) ( Table 1 ), with 1,327 ± 213 (mean ± SD) resting eggs in mixed cultures, and 853 ± 171 (mean ± SD) in monocultures.
Fig. 6 shows that copepod population growth did not differ between copepod monoculture and mixed culture with roti-fers during the 16 day experimental period. This trend was not changed with the separation of the developmental stages (nauplius, copepodid and egg-carrying females) of the cope-pods ( Fig. 7 ).
Rotifer mass culture tanks comprise intricate relationships among the constituents of the small ecosystem. These small ecosystems are mainly composed of rotifers and contaminant micro-organisms, such as bacteria, microalgae, protozoa and copepods. Many of these contaminant micro-organisms affect rotifer population growth through interactions such as exploit-ative competition for food, conmensalism, ammensalism and physical interference competition (Hagiwara et al., 1995b; Jung et al., 1997).
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Comparison of the numbers of each developmental stages, nauplius, copepodid and egg carrying female of copepod Apocyclops borneoensis in the mono culture (blank circles) and mixed culture with rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis (solid circles).
No predator-prey relationship was observed between the two zooplankton species during the experimental period. However, interference between the two species was observed. It was noted that the copepod used a filter feeding mechanism in which it filtered the slowly swimming rotifers together with algae (food), but immediately rejected the rotifers, which started to swim. Rejected rotifers appeared to be unharmed, but may have suffered some physical damage or injury. The physical damage by copepods may have brought about the de-crease in rotifer population growth.
Microalgae, including Nannochloropsis , Dunaliella , Tetra-selmis and enriched freshwater Chlorella are commonly used foods in the mass culture of rotifers (Witt et al., 1981). Of these, Tetraselmis is well known among aquaculturists as a good food for rotifer and copepod cultures. In this study, in both mono and mixed cultures of rotifers, the density of T. suecica continuously decreased. However, in the monoculture of the copepod A. borneoensis , algal density did not decrease, but maintained a constant level after small amounts were used as food by the copepods, and the added food volume appeared sufficient to maintain algal density. This indicated that A. bor-neoensis may not eat much and/or did not actively feed on T. suecica in monoculture. This suggests that there was not competition for food, and that sufficient amounts of food ( T. suecica ) were supplied for the copepod A. borneoensis under these experimental conditions.
The presence of the rotifer did not influence the popula-tion growth of the copepods, likely because of the large size differential between B. rotundiformis (c. 02 mm) and A. bor-neoensis (c. 0.8 mm). However, the copepod suppressed ro-tifer population growth after 10 days in mixed culture. The population growth of B. rotundiformis in mixed culture was associated with a reduction in the numbers of both non-egg bearing females and egg-bearing females.
An analysis of the population structures revealed that the rotifer population growth decreased due to a 30% reduction in females without eggs and amictic females. In contrast, mictic females in mixed cultures were more abundant than those in monocultures. Thus, the presence of copepods stimulated the sexual reproduction of the rotifer (mixis rate or resting egg formation), which in turn caused decreased rotifer population growth. It is of interest to conduct further research to clarify this mechanism.
The dormant stage of the rotifer (resting egg or cyst) is very resistant to harsh environmental conditions and may be dis-persed over wide areas by wind, water or migrating animals. Sometimes, scientists induce the production of mixis repro-duction (cyst) as an easy method of storing and transport-ing for marine fish larvae culture or aquaculture study. The hatching of rotifer resting eggs is caused by stimulation from light, temperature, salinity and some chemicals (reviewed by Hagiwara, 1996), but there is no known method to artificially produce rotifer cysts.
The high mixis rate (70% or more) in this study could be related to the algal species used as food. Tetraselmis tetrathele as a food source stimulated a high mixis rate (81%), which led to the successful mass production of resting eggs (101 x 10 6 Ind.) of the Hawaiian strain of B. rotundiformis (Hagiwara and Lee, 1991). Another report indicated that bacteria populations in mass cultures regulated the sexual reproduction of rotifers (Hagiwara et al., 1994). Two marine copepod species were successfully cultured when consuming bacteria alone (Rieper, 1978). This mechanism has also been discussed with the ef-fects of bacteria on interspecific relationships between B. ro-tundiformis and the two copepod species, Tigriopus japonicus and Acartia (Hagiwara et al., 1995b; Jung et al., 1997). The present study also highlights the significance of bacterial flora on the population growth of A. borneoensis .
Population growth of A. borneoensis in mixed culture did not differ compared with that in monoculture. However, the number of nauplii decreased to 17% and the number of egg bearing females was 1.62 times higher in mixed culture. The reason for this was not clear, but may be associated with the feeding mechanisms of copepods such as Apocyclops , which may utilize feces more efficiently than they do bacteria in the water column. Various copepod species used as live food or-ganisms utilized bacteria as their food. The common marine copepod species Tigriopus japonicus utilized bacteria (Jung et al., 1998) and rotifer feces (Jung et al., 2000) as food in the early nauplius developmental stages. The individuals in each developmental stage may also have different feeding habitats, due to changes in their mandible structures (Itoh, 1970). The experimental copepod Apocyclops appears to utilize egg sac conservation for the preservation of the species. This may explain the low survival rate of Apocyclops nauplii that was observed in mixed cultures.
I am indebted to Dr. Cheng-Sheng Lee of Center for Tropi-cal and Subtropical Aquaculture, The Oceanic Institute in Ha-waii, USA and Mr. Diegane Ndong of Agence Nationale De L’Aquaculture, Senegal. This study was funded by National Fisheries Research & Development Institute of Korea (NFR-DI, RP-2011-AQ-059).
Begon M , Harper JL , Townsend CR 1990 Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. 2nd ed. Bleckwell Scientific Pub-lishers Boston, MA, US.
Chen SH , Suzaki T , Hino A 1997 Lethality of the heliozoon Ox-nerella maritima on the rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis. Fish Sci 63 543 - 546
Fu Y , Hirayama K , Natsukari Y 1991 Morphological differences between two types of the rotifers Brachionus plicatilis O. F. Mül-ler. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 151 29 - 41
Fukusho K , Hara O , Yoshio J 1976 Records on collection of the copepod Tigriopus japonicus appeared in large scale outdoor tanks for mass culture of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis by yeast. Bull Nagasaki Prefect Inst Fish 2 117 - 121
Gilbert JJ 1988 Susceptibilities of ten rotifer species to interference from Daphnia pulex. Ecology 69 1826 - 1838
Gilbert JJ , Stemberger RS 1985 Control of Keratella populations by interference competition from Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr 30 180 - 188
Hagiwara A 1996 Use of resting eggs for mass preservation of marine rotifers. Saibai Giken 24 109 - 120
Hagiwara A , Lee CS 1991 Resting egg formation of the L- and S-type rotifer Brachionus plicatilis under different water tempera-ture. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 57 1645 - 1650
Hagiwara A , Hino A , Hirano R 1988 Effects of temperature and chlorinity on resting egg formation in the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 54 569 - 575
Hagiwara A , Hamada K , Hori S , Hirayama K 1994 Increased sexu-al reproduction in Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera) with the addition of bacteria and rotifer extracts. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 181 1 - 8
Hagiwara A , Kotani T , Snell TW , Assava-Aree M , Hirayama K 1995a Morphology, reproduction, genetics, and mating behavior of small, tropical marine Brachionus strain (Rotifera). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 194 25 - 37
Hagiwara A , Jung M-M , Sato T , Hirayama K 1995b Interspecific relation between marine rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis and zoo-plankton species contaminating in the rotifer mass culture tank. Fish Sci 61 623 - 627
Itoh K 1970 A consideration on feeding habits of planktonic copepods in relation to the structure of their oral parts. Bull Plankton Soc Jpn 17 1 - 10
Jung M-M , Hagiwara A , Hirayama K 1997 Interspecific interac-tions in the marine rotifer microcosm. Hydrobiologia 358 121 - 126
Jung M-M , Rho S , Kim PY 1998 Feeding of bacteria by copepod, Tigriopus japonicus. J Aquac 11 113 - 118
Jung M-M , Kim H-S , Rho S 2000 Cultivation of Tigriopus japoni-cus by products of rotifer culture tanks. J Aquac 13 63 - 67
Reguera B 1984 The effect of ciliate contamination in mass cultures of the rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis O. F. Müller. Aquaculture 40 103 - 108
Rieper M 1978 Bacteria as food for marine harpacticoid copepods. Mar Biol 45 337 - 345
Takayama H 1979 Observations on Noctiluca scintillans Macartney: feeding behavior. Bull Hiroshima Prefect Inst Fish 10 27 - 34
Witt U , Koske PH , Kuhlmann D , Lenz J , Nellen W 1981 Produc-tion of Nannochloris spec. (Chlorophyceae) in large scale outdoor tanks and its use as a food organism in marine aquaculture. Aqua-culture 23 171 - 181
Yu JP , Hino A , Noguchi T , Wakabayashi H 1990 Toxicity of Vibrio alginolyticus on the survival of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 56 1455 - 1460