Advanced
A Stress Analysis Method for the Rotor Design of an IPMSM Considering Radial Force
A Stress Analysis Method for the Rotor Design of an IPMSM Considering Radial Force
Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology. 2014. May, 9(3): 888-892
Copyright © 2014, The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
  • Received : September 29, 2013
  • Accepted : November 28, 2013
  • Published : May 01, 2014
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Won-Ho Kim
Corresponding Author: Material & Device Research Center, Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Samsung Electronics Co., Korea. (wonho79@nate.com)

Abstract
In the design of the rotor of an interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM), the bridge between the permanent magnets helps prevent the scattering of permanent magnets and pole pieces during high-speed operation. In the design of a motor, if the bridge is too thick, its performance will be largely degraded because of flux leakage. Additionally, if the bridge is too thin, its mechanical safety cannot be guaranteed. Thus, an accurate analysis method is required to determine the thickness of the bridge. Conventional stress analysis methods determine the thickness of the bridge by only considering the centrifugal force of the rotors. In this study, however, a method that additionally considers the radial force generated by the air-gap flux density based on the conventional methods is proposed and reflected in the design of a traction motor for electric vehicles. Finally, the validity of this study is verified through a reliability test related to high-speed operation.
Keywords
1. Introduction
Recently, the interior permanent magnet synchronous motors (IPMSMs) have been frequently used in traction motors for vehicles, and their driving scope has also been extended to high-speed operation at more than 10,000 rpm in order to increase power densities [1 - 2] . For such highspeed motor operation, the accurate stress analysis of rotors is an important factor in the reliability of motors. If the safety factor is not properly calculated because of an inexact stress analysis, it will cause a serious problem in the reliability test at high-speed operation owing to mechanical interference between the rotor and the stator, as presented in Fig. 1 .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Mechanical interference between the rotor and the stator
In this study, a method that considers the additional radial force caused by an electromagnetic phenomenon in addition to the conventional stress analysis method, which usually considers the centrifugal force of the rotors [3] , is proposed for calculating the safety factors more exactly. The motor used in this study is in the 120-kW class used for traction applied to military trucks, and its performance specifications, dimensions, and material information are presented in Table. 1 . Additionally, Fig. 2 shows the shape of this motor.
Specifications of the 120-kW motor
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Specifications of the 120-kW motor
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Model of a 120-kW motor
2. Calculation of the Radial Force
The radial force is not a type of actual force (tangential force) but rather affects the vibration or acoustic performance [4 - 6] . Furthermore, the direction of this force coincides with the scattering direction of the rotors, which is caused by the centrifugal force of the rotors, and is used to produce a more exact result when it is accounted for in the calculation of stresses.
For the calculation of the radial force, the worst condition is a point at which the motor is operated at the maximum speed (10,000rpm) while applying current (with a phase current of 500A peak and a current phase angle of 76.8°) or the coasting speed (12,000rpm) without applying a current at a downward slope.
The radial force can be calculated using Eq. (1), in which the radial flux density in the air gap can be obtained using FEA [7] .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where Bgr is the radial flux density at the air gap, θ is the rotor position, and μ0 is the permeability of free space.
Figs. 3 and Fig. 4 show the radial flux density and flux density distribution plots at two driving points. The flux density distribution at the maximum speed shows a wide magnetic saturation area. However, the condition at the coasting speed exhibits a radial flux density approximately 24 % higher than the condition at the maximum speed according to the comparison of the integration values of Bgr2 , which are proportional to radial force. It is expected that the flux weakening current is generated along the direction of decreasing air-gap flux. Based on this fact, it is revealed that the worst condition of the calculated stress is the coasting speed region that exhibits a large radial force and centrifugal force.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Radial flux density at two driving points
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Flux density distribution plot at two driving points
Fig. 5 shows the spatial distribution of the radial force per unit area at the coasting speed. When comparing this result with the shape of the rotor in Fig. 2 , it is verified that the radial force is symmetrically distributed, and most of the force is focused on the pole piece, which is the front side of the permanent magnet.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Spatial distribution of the radial force at 12,000rpm
3. Stress Analysis Method Considering the Radial Force
In general, the stress analysis considers only the centrifugal force:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where F is the centrifugal force, m is the mass, v is the rotational velocity, and r is the radius of the mass.
The stress analysis shows differences in the results according to the boundary conditions. In this paper, there are no friction conditions on the contact face between the magnet and the pole piece, and a bonding friction condition is only applied to the backside of the magnet. In addition, the calculated radial force is mapped to the thick area on the pole piece in Fig. 6 . The final equivalent stress is calculated using FEA after applying all these conditions at 12,000 rpm.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Boundary conditions and the radial force mapping area
The safety factor can be calculated as:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where σYield is the yield strength, σE is the equivalent stress, and σx , σy , σz , σxy , σyz , and σzx are the direct stress components.
Table 2 shows the equivalent stress, safety factor, torque, and efficiency for various bridge thicknesses by using FEA simulation. In the analysis of the results, the safety factor and torque represent a tradeoff relation and do not affect the efficiency significantly. The motor used in this study is a military type, and its safety factor is conservatively limited by more than 2.4. The bridge thickness of 1mm that satisfies the target safety factor and torque (more than 403Nm) simultaneously is selected for the final model.
Results for various bridge thicknesses
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Results for various bridge thicknesses
To determine the effect of the radial force, the final model is analyzed using the conventional and proposed methods. The results of this comparison are presented in Figs. 7 and Table 3 . Fig. 7 is intended to more reliably confirm that the result was 170 times larger than the actual deformation. It is verified that the stress is usually distributed in the rib and bridge of the rotor in these two cases. However, there is a difference in its equivalent stress of approximately 9MPa when considering the radial force. The difference is equivalent to the safety factor of 0.13 and cannot be neglected in the precise design of the bridge.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Results for various bridge thicknesses
Comparison with the conventional and proposed methods
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Comparison with the conventional and proposed methods
4. Experiment
To verify the validity in the design of the bridge, the final model was fabricated, and tests were performed. Figs. 8 and Fig. 9 represent the fabricated cores, motor, and dynamometer.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Fabricated stator and rotor core
PPT Slide
Lager Image
120-kW IPMSM and test dynamometer
In order to verify the validity of the radial force simulation, the no-load EMF at 3,000 rpm is compared with experimental data and FEA. The results are shown in Fig. 10 and Table 4 , and it was verified that the radial force simulation is valid.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
No-load EMF at 3000rpm
Comparison with the experiment and FEA
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Comparison with the experiment and FEA
The profile of the high-speed cycle durability test is presented in Fig. 11 , where the test had duration of 36,000 cycles for 500 hours. The coasting speed test rotated the fabricated motor compulsorily by operating the test dynamometer at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. Based on the results of these two tests, there were no mechanical problems and no changes in motor performance. Additionally, it was verified that the stress analysis method and bridge design proposed in this study are reasonable.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Profile of the high-speed cycle durability test
5. Conclusion
In this study, a stress analysis method considering the radial force was proposed and applied to the design of a 120-kW IPMSM. Additionally, the validity of this method was verified by fabrication of a model and testing.
The results of this study show that the proposed method is effective for a switched reluctance motor (SRM) with a very large radial force and small air gap [8 - 9] .
BIO
Won-Ho Kim He received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea in 2005, 2007 and 2011 respectively. He is now working in Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology. His research interests include motor design, analysis of motor / generator; and applications of motor drive, such as electric vehicles, home appliances.
References
Sulaiman E. , Kosaka T. , Matsui N. 2011 “High Power Density Design of 6-Slot - 8-Pole Hybrid Excitation Flux Switching Machine for Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on 47 4453 - 4456    DOI : 10.1109/TMAG.2011.2140315
Zhang Lei , Wen Xuhui , Zhang Jian , Wang Youlong 2011 “Research of high power-density permanent magnet synchronous motor and driving system,” Electric Information and Control Engineering (ICEICE) 6052 - 6055
Jung Jae-Woo , Lee Byeong-Hwa , Kim Do-Jin , Hong Jung- Pyo , Kim Jae-Young , Jeon Seong-Min , Song Do- Hoon 2012 “Mechanical Stress Reduction of Rotor Core of Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor,” Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on. 48 911 - 914    DOI : 10.1109/TMAG.2011.2172582
Cameron D.E. , Lang J.H. , Umans S.D. 1992 “The origin and reduction of acoustic noise in doubly salient variable-reluctance motors,” Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on. 28 1250 - 1255    DOI : 10.1109/28.175275
Guandong Jiao , Rahn C.D. 2004 “Field weakening for radial force reduction in brushless permanent-magnet DC motors,” Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on 40 3286 - 3292    DOI : 10.1109/TMAG.2004.832989
Krotsch J. , Ley T. , Piepenbreier B. 2011 “Reduction of torque and radial force fluctuation in permanent magnet synchronous motors by means of multiobjective optimization,” Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC) 40 - 48
Zhu Z.Q. , Xia Z.P. , Wu L.J. , Jewell G.W. 2010 “Analytical Modeling and Finite-Element Computation of Radial Vibration Force in Fractional-Slot Permanent-Magnet Brushless Machines,” Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on. 46 1908 - 1918    DOI : 10.1109/TIA.2010.2058078
Anwar M.N. , Husain O. 2000 “Radial force calculation and acoustic noise prediction in switched reluctance machines,” Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on. 36 1589 - 1597    DOI : 10.1109/28.887210
Lin Feng-Chieh , Yang Sheng-Ming 2006 “Modeling and Control of Radial Force in Switched Reluctance Motor,” Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC) 1 - 7