Advanced
Study on Current Limiting Characteristics of a Flux-locktype SFCL using Series Connected Two Coils with Twice Triggering Operation
Study on Current Limiting Characteristics of a Flux-locktype SFCL using Series Connected Two Coils with Twice Triggering Operation
Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology. 2014. May, 9(3): 777-781
Copyright © 2014, The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
  • Received : April 08, 2013
  • Accepted : February 24, 2014
  • Published : May 01, 2014
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Tae-Hee Han
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Jungwon Univerity, Chungbuk Korea (hantaehee@jwu.ac.kr)
Seok-Cheol Ko
Industry-University Cooperation Foundation, Kongju National University, Chungnam, Korea (suntrac@kongju.ac.kr)
Byongjun Lee
School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Korea (leeb@korea.ac.kr)
Sung-Hun Lim
Corresponding Author: Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Soongsil University, Korea. (superlsh73@ssu.ac.kr)

Abstract
The current limiting characteristics of the flux-lock type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) using series connected two coils with twice triggering operation, which consists of series connected two coils and two superconducting (SC) modules with the inserting resistance, was analyzed. The feature of the suggested SFCL is that it can limit the fault current by triggering either one SC module or two SC modules comprising the SFCL depending on the amplitude of the fault current. To verify the current limiting operation of the suggested SFCL, the short-circuits in the fault location with the different fault currents were tested and its useful operations were described through the analysis on the tested results.
Keywords
1. Introduction
The continuous increment in the power demand and the power generation due to the industrial development and the economic growth has caused the increase of fault currents resulted from the short circuits in a power system. This increase of fault currents has accelerated the excess of the breaking capacity of existing circuit breakers, which could bring about the rise of economic costs resulted from the exchange of the related power equipments with larger capacity. In addition, the occurrence of a short circuit in a power system causes the bus-voltage to be dropped and the stability of the power system to be lower. With the efforts of the researchers to suppress this fault current as the most effective countermeasures, the studies for the application of the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) in a power system have been actively made [1 - 5] .
The one of the advantages of the SFCL is to simultaneously perform two operations to detect and limit the fault current without the help of the additional detecting device. However, it is not easy to limit the fault current effectively according to its amplitude because of its instantaneous limiting characteristics using the quench of the superconducting (SC) modules comprising the SFCL. Among one of the developed SFCLs [4 - 8] , the flux-lock type SFCL has been shown to have the merit to easily adjust the operational current and the limiting impedance of the SFCL by setting both the winding direction and the inductance ratio between two coils [8 - 10] . Recently, the SFCL model with the peak current limiting function using two separated SC modules has been suggested and their effective current limiting characteristics have been described [10 - 12] .
In this paper, the flux-lock type SFCL using series connected two coils with twice triggering operation was suggested and its effective fault-current limiting characteristics were analyzed. For the comparative analysis on the operation of the suggested SFCL, the short-circuit tests in two different fault locations to affect the amplitude of the fault current were conducted and its usefulness of the proposed SFCL was analyzed.
2. Structure and Operational Principle
Fig. 1 shows the circuit configuration of the suggested flux-lock type SFCL using series connected two coils with twice triggering operation. The SFCL consists of two coils wound in series on the iron core and triggering module with two SC modules connected in parallel each other through the inserting resistance (R X ), which is connected in series with one of two SC modules. Two SC modules are contributed to the triggering operation of the SFCL by quench occurrence of one SC module or two SC modules according to the amplitude of the fault current. i 1 and i 2 are the currents of coil 1 and coil 2, respectively. i T1 and i T2 represent the currents in two SC modules, respectively.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Circuit configuration of a flux-lock type SFCL using series connected two coils with twice triggering operation.
The basic operation of the suggested SFCL using series connected two coils with twice triggering operation is the same as the previous flux-lock type SFCL using magnetically coupled two coils except for its twice triggering operation according to the amplitude of the fault current. If the current of the SC 1 module ( i T1 ) exceeds its critical current ( Ic ) immediately after the short-circuit occurs, the resistance of the SC 1 module generates. After that, if the portion of the fault current flowing into the SC 2 ( i T2 ) module is lower, which does not exceed its critical current, the SC 2 module keeps the zero resistance. If the larger portion of the fault current flows into the SC 2 module, on the other hand, the resistance of the SC 2 module generates by its quench occurrence due to the excess of its critical current.
The magnetic flux in the iron core comprising this SFCL, dependent on the resistance of SC module, occurs together with the resistance generation of one SC module or two SC modules, which contributes to the fault current limiting operation of the SFCL with twice triggering operation. In other words, the lower or the higher magnetic flux in the iron core comprising the SFCL can be generated through the resistance generation of one SC module or two SC modules. Therefore, the higher fault current can be limited through the higher magnetic flux by the resistance generation of two SC modules and the lower fault current, on the other hand, can be limited through the lower magnetic flux by the resistance generation of one SC module.
3. Construction of Experimental Circuit
The simulated power distribution system was constructed to test the available operation of the suggested SFCL in case that this SFCL was applied into a real power distribution system. Fig. 2 shows the schematic configuration of the constructed power distribution system together with SFCL. The constructed power distribution system consists of the scaled-down one distribution transformer and two feeders with series connected three impedance lines, designed with consideration for real power distribution lines. Load resistance was designed to be branched from ending part of each impedance line. The SFCL was installed behind the circuit breaker (CB f1 ), which was located in the outgoing point of the fault feeder.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Schematic configuration of a power distribution system with the SFCL where is applied into the outgoing point of the fault feeder.
After the source voltage of 400 [V] (E in ) was applied into the primary side of the distribution transformer, the short-circuits for the higher and the lower fault currents were simulated at two points of the fault feeder (F 1 , F 2 ) as indicated in Fig. 2 with the fault arrows in front of load 1 and load 3 , respectively. The design specifications of the experimental power distribution system with the suggested SFCL as shown in Fig. 2 were listed in Table 1 .
Design specifications of the experimental power distribution system with the SFCL.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Design specifications of the experimental power distribution system with the SFCL.
4. Results and Discussions
Fig. 3 shows the fault current limiting characteristics of the SFCL in case that the fault occurs at F 1 location. As seen in Fig. 3(a) , the current in coil 2 ( i 2 ) can be observed to flow with the reverse direction to the one of coil 1, which is resulted from the winding direction between two coils with additive polarity winding. Together with the currents of the coil 2 and two SC modules, the current in coil 1 ( i 1 ), which is equal to the current of the fault line ( i f1 ) in Fig. 2 , can be also found to be limited once more about two periods after the fault occurrence. For this second limiting operation of this SFCL, it can be described from Fig. 3(b) with the initial larger current ( i T ) flowing into two SC modules immediately after the fault occurrence, which makes the SC 2 module to be fully quenched in succession after the quench in the SC 1 module happens.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Fault current limiting characteristics of a flux-lock type SFCL using series connected two coils with twice triggering operation in case that the fault occurs at F1 location: (a) Current and voltage waveforms of two coils comprising SFCL; (b) Current and voltage waveforms of two SC modules comprising the SFCL.
For about two periods after the fault occurrence as seen in Fig. 3(b) , the quench and the recovery operations of the SC 2 module between the normal conducting state and the superconducting state can be observed as well. However, two periods after the fault occurrence, the SC 2 module is seen to be fully quenched, not to recover into the superconducting state.
The voltages of two coils, which are induced as the negligible lower amplitude before the fault occurrence and, on the other hand, are induced as the large amplitude immediately after the fault occurrence, can be seen to be increased into the larger amplitudes two periods after the fault occurrence due to the quench occurrence of SC 2 module after the quench occurrence of SC 1 module.
In case that the short-circuit occurs in another fault location of the simulated power distribution system, F 2 , which is expected for the lower fault current compared to F 1 location to be generated, the fault current limiting characteristics of the SFCL were shown in Fig. 4.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Fault current limiting characteristics of a flux-lock type SFCL using series connected two coils with twice triggering operation in case that the fault occurs at F2 location: (a) Current and voltage waveforms of two coils comprising SFCL; (b) Current and voltage waveforms of two SC modules comprising the SFCL.
Contrary to F 1 fault location, the fault current in case of the F 2 fault location can be seen to be limited only once immediately after the fault occurrence due to the lower fault current. This lower fault current is observed to have only SC 1 module to be quenched as seen from the voltage waveforms of two SC modules in Fig. 4(b) .
The quench characteristics and the power burdens of two SC modules during the fault period were compared for F 1 and F 2 fault locations and shown in Figs. 5 and 6 , respectively. In case of F 1 fault location, until the SC 2 module is fully quenched, which corresponds to the period before the 2 nd limiting operation of the SFCL starts, the larger amount of the power burden can be analyzed to be generated in the inserting resistance ( p X ) as seen in Fig. 5(b) . On the other hand, since the SC 2 module is fully quenched, the power burden of the inserting resistance abruptly decreases and most of power burden is taken in two SC modules ( p T SC ). In addition, the total power burden comprising the triggering module can be observed to be decreased more than the period before the SC 2 module is fully quenched, which is thought to be favorable operation from the total power burden of the triggering module viewpoint.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Quench characteristics and power burdens of two SC modules during the fault period in case that the fault occurs at F1 location: (a) Voltage and resistance curves of two SC modules; (b) Power waveforms of two SC modules and inserting resistance.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Quench characteristics and power burdens of two SC modules during the fault period in case that the fault occurs at F2 location. (a) Voltage and resistance curves of two SC modules. (b) Power waveforms of two SC modules and inserting resistance.
In case of F 2 fault location as shown in Fig. 6 , the power burden in the inserting resistance can be seen to take most of power burden of the triggering module because the SC 2 module due to the lower fault current is not fully quenched, which agrees with the analyzed result in Fig. 5 .
From above analysis, the effective current limiting operation of the flux-lock type SFCL using series connected two coils through twice triggering operation using two SC modules could be obtained and confirmed to be effectively performed by triggering either one SC module for lower fault current or two SC modules for higher fault current. Especially, the total power burden in the triggering module comprising the SFCL could be analyzed to be more decreased through the quench occurrence in two SC modules in case that the larger fault current occurred.
4. Conclusion
In this paper, the flux-lock type SFCL using series connected two coils with twice triggering operation, which consisted of two coils wound in series on the iron core and triggering module with two SC modules, was suggested. For the verification of the usefulness of the proposed SFCL, two different fault locations to affect the amplitude of the fault current in the simulated power distribution system were selected and the short-circuit tests in two selected fault locations were carried out.
Through the comparative analysis on the short-circuit tests for the fault currents with the different amplitudes, the effective fault current limiting operations of the flux-lock type SFCL using series connected two coils were confirmed to be obtained through twice triggering operation using two SC modules with the decreased power burden.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. 2010-0028509).
BIO
Tae-Hee Han He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from Chonbuk National Univ., Korea in 1991, 1994, and 1999, respectively. Currently, he is a professor in the Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering at Jungwon Univ. Korea.
Seok-Cheol Ko He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from Chonbuk National Univ., Korea in 1996, 2002, and 2005, respectively. Currently, he is a professor in the Industry-University Cooperation Foundation at Kongju National Univ., Korea.
Byongjun Lee He received B.S. degree from Korea University, Seoul, Korea in 1987, M.S. and Ph.D degrees in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State University in 1991 and 1994 respectively. He is currently a professor in the Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Korea University.
Sung-Hun Lim He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from Chonbuk National Univ., Korea in 1996, 1998, and 2003, respectively. Currently, he is a professor in the Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Soongsil Univ. Korea.
References
You I. K. , Lim S. H. , Kim J. C. , Hyun O. B. 2010 “Study on Protection Coordination Between Protective Devices in a Power Distribution System With an SFCL,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercon. 20 (3) 1168 - 1171    DOI : 10.1109/TASC.2010.2040267
Kim J. S. , Lim S. H. , Kim J. C. 2011 “Analysis on fault current limiting and bus-voltage sag suppressing operations of SFCLs using magnetic coupling of two coils according to their application locations in a power distribution system,” Phys. C 471 1358 - 1363    DOI : 10.1016/j.physc.2011.05.194
Lim S.H. , Kim J.C. , Moon J.F. , Rhee S.B. , Kim C.H. , Hyun O.B. 2009 “Quench and Recovery Characteristics of a SFCL Applied Into Neutral Line of a Three- Phase Power System,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercon. 19 (3) 1835 - 1838    DOI : 10.1109/TASC.2009.2017754
Hyun O. B. , Park K. B. , Sim J. W. , Kim H. R. , Yim S. W. , Oh I. S. 2009 “Introduction of a Hybrid SFCL in KEPCO Grid and Local Points at Issues,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercon. 19 (3) 1946 - 1949    DOI : 10.1109/TASC.2009.2018256
Lim S. H. 2007 “Operational characteristics of flux-lock type SFCL with series connection of two coils,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercon. 17 (2) 1895 - 1898    DOI : 10.1109/TASC.2007.899869
Kadoe H. , Ichikawa M. 1997 “Performance of a high-Tc superconducting fault current limiter-design of a 6.6 kV magnetic shielding type superconducting fault current limiter,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercon. 7 (2) 993 - 996    DOI : 10.1109/77.614672
Hara T. , Okuma T. , Yamamoto T. , Ito D. , Tasaki K. , Tsurunaga K. 1993 “Development of a new 6.6 kV/ 1500 A class superconducting fault current limiter for electric power systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 8 (1) 182 - 192    DOI : 10.1109/61.180335
Lim S. H. , Choi H. S. , Han B. S. 2004 “Fault Current Limiting Characteristics due to Winding Direction between Coil 1 and Coil 2 in a flux-lock type SFCL,” Physica C 416 34 - 42    DOI : 10.1016/j.physc.2004.08.019
Lim S. H. , Moon J. F. , Kim J. C. 2009 “Current Limiting and Recovery Characteristics of SFCLs Using Magnetic Coupling of Two Coils,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercon. 19 (3) 1900 - 1903    DOI : 10.1109/TASC.2009.2017710
Lim S. H. , You I. K. , Kim J. C. 2011 “Study on peak current limiting characteristics of a flux-lock type SFCL using its third winding,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercon. 21 (3) 1275 - 1279    DOI : 10.1109/TASC.2010.2093863
Lim S. H. 2011 “Analysis on current limiting characteristics of a flux-lock type SFCL with two triggering current levels,” Physica C 471 1354 - 1357    DOI : 10.1016/j.physc.2011.05.193
Lim S. H. , Ko S. C. , Han T. H. 2013 “Analysis on current limiting characteristics of a transformer type SFCL with two triggering current levels,” Physica C 484 253 - 257    DOI : 10.1016/j.physc.2012.03.011