Advanced
The Iron loss Estimation of IPMSM According to Current Phase Angle
The Iron loss Estimation of IPMSM According to Current Phase Angle
Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology. 2013. Nov, 8(6): 1345-1351
Copyright © 2013, The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
  • Received : February 25, 2013
  • Accepted : May 27, 2013
  • Published : November 01, 2013
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
TagCloud
About the Authors
Gyu-Won Cho
Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Changwon National University, Korea. ({chogyuwon, dykim}@changwon.ac.kr)
Dong-Yeong Kim
Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Changwon National University, Korea. ({chogyuwon, dykim}@changwon.ac.kr)
Gyu-Tak Kim
Corresponding Author: Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Changwon National University, Korea. (gtkim@changwon.ac.kr)

Abstract
Variable iron loss as function of current phase angle of Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor(IPMSM) was calculated through Curve Fitting Method(CFM). Also, a magnetic flux density distribution of iron core according to current phase angle was analyzed, and an iron loss calculation was performed including harmonic distortion. The experiment was performed by production of non-magnetizing model for the separation of mechanical loss, and the iron loss was calculated by the measurement of input using power analyzer and output power using dynamometer. Some error was generated between experimental results and calculation value, but an iron loss diminution according to current phase angle followed a same pattern. So, errors were generated by measurement, vibration, noise, harmonic distortion loss, etc.
Keywords
1. Introduction
Generally, iron loss is usually known as the no-load loss in electrical machine. But, iron loss was changed due to control strategy as id=0, Maximum Torque Per Ampere (MTPA), maximum efficiency control and maximum power factor according to the current phase angle [1 , 2] . The formula of iron loss depends on magnetic flux density, and d-axis current has an effect on magnetic flux density distribution in iron core [3 , 4] . The iron loss current was increased by increasing iron loss, but total torque decreased. Therefore, the iron loss variation should be considered in d, q-axis equivalent circuit of IPMSM.
In this paper, the iron loss was closely calculated from Finite Elements Method(FEM) according to current phase angle by magnetic flux density. And, the direct measurement of iron loss was very difficult. At measurement of input and output powers, a very small amount of loss was always presented. Therefore, in this paper, the input was measured by power analyzer, and output was measured by dynamometer. And then, output power, copper loss and mechanical loss were left out of the input power. On the assumption that the remaining losses were composited by the iron loss and total error losses. The total error losses were measured error, vibration, noise, harmonic distortion of current and voltage losses, etc.
2. Iron Loss
The iron loss is calculated from iron loss coefficients by Curve Fitting Method(CFM). The estimation on the iron loss coefficients were performed by FEM and magnetic field variation of iron core [5 , 6] .
Fig. 1 shows comparison of analyzed value and experimental value. The numerical formula of iron loss can be obtained by (1).
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where kh is the hysteresis loss coefficient, ke is eddycurrent coefficient, ka is abnormal eddy-current loss, f is operating frequency, Bm is maximum value of magnetic flux density.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The comparison of analyzed value and experimental value at no-load
Fig. 2 shows the result of linkage flux by FEM and iron loss at rated current and rated speed.
The iron loss by current phase angle was slowly decreased from current phase angle 0°. The d-axis current was affected on total linkage flux on the direction of shrinkage. If current phase angle increased, d-axis current also increased. So, an iron loss was decreased by reduction of magnetic flux density of iron core.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The variable linkage flux and calculation of iron loss
3. Iron Loss According to Current Phase Angle
Generally, an iron loss is usually known as the no-load loss in electrical machine. But the iron loss can be change by current in IPMSM. Because, the magnetic flux density of iron core was increased by composition of a permanent magnet flux and a flux by current.
Fig. 3 shows the increased linkage flux at a flow of current. The linkage flux at current phase angle 0° was larger than no-load linkage flux like as Fig. 3(a) . The linkage flux and iron loss have the same magnitude as noload linkage flux at current phase angle 20°. Fig. 3(b) shows linkage flux according to current phase angle. The gap between no-load linkage flux and total linkage flux were increased in 0° to 20° like as A, but it slowly decreased after current phase angle 20° like as B.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Magnitude and phase of linkage flux
Fig. 4 shows separation of teeth by 55 elements for an iron loss calculation. The source of increasing iron loss was analyzed by comprising the magnetic flux density at noload and current flow on circle marks [6] .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Separations of stator teeth
Figs. 5 - 7 shows magnetic flux density of radial direction and tangential direction. The radial and tangential magnetic flux density was increased in point 15 and 33. These points are the rotating magnetic field. Here, β is current phase angle. So, magnitude of magnetic flux density was largely increased than no-load case, because magnitude of magnetic flux density was calculated from summation of square of radial and tangential magnetic flux density [7 , 8] . The point 24 is an alternating field. The phase of magnetic flux density was changed due to current, and it magnitude was increased. As a result, the iron loss was increased, because the iron core magnetic flux density of current phase angle 0° was larger than no-load magnetic flux density [9] .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Flux density pattern of point 15: (a) comparison of flux density components; (b) comparison of flux density magnitude
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Flux density pattern of point 24: (a) comparison of flux density components; (b) comparison of flux density magnitude
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Flux density pattern of point 33: (a) comparison of flux density components; (b) comparison of flux density magnitude
Fig. 8 shows Fast Fourier Transform(FFT) of magnetic flux density in each point. The fundamental component was increased, and the iron loss was calculated from (2) considering of harmonic distortion.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The iron loss was increased, 34.4% in P15, 12.9% in P24 and 30.3% in P33. Obviously, iron loss was changed by magnetic flux density in 55 elements at a flow of current.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
FFT of magnetic flux density
4. Experimental Verification
The iron loss is measured in Fig. 1 , which does not magnetize the permanent magnet, and the mechanical loss is measured at the rated speed. In no-load input of the test motor at the same speed, the iron loss was measured by excluding the mechanical loss.
Fig. 9 shows torque experimental equipment. The torque and speed were measured by dynamometer. The torque was measured at current phase angle 7°, 27°, 47° and 67°.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Experimental equipment
Fig. 10 shows variation of total torque. The torque was decreased by a rising iron loss. Because, q-axis current was decreased by an iron loss current. So, precise estimation of iron loss is very important in torque calculation.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Generated torque in consider of iron loss
Fig. 11 shows experimental result of torque. The torque calculation was performed by voltage equation of IPMSM [10] . The iron loss was calculated by CFM of magnetic flux density in the iron core. The iron loss analysis in the previous study was carried out in advance paper [11] .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Comparison of torque
The torque was changed. Because the q-axis current was decreased by the variation of iron loss. So, the torque estimation was affected by the iron loss calculation. The maximum error was generated 4.5% at current phase angle 67°. The vibration and noise according to rising current phase angle were a cause of error. But, another current phase angle does not have error nearly.
The direct measurement of iron loss was very difficult. At measurement of input and output powers, a very small amount of loss was always presented. Therefore, in this paper, the input was measured by power analyzer, and output was measured by dynamometer. And then, output power, copper loss and mechanical loss were left out of the input power. So, the remaining losses were composited by the iron loss and total error losses [12 , 13] . The total error losses were measured error, vibration, noise, harmonic component loss, etc. The numerical formula of loss composition can be obtained by (3).
PPT Slide
Lager Image
here, WIn is input power, Wout is output power, Wc is the copper loss, Wm is the mechanical loss, Wi is the iron loss, Wer is total error losses.
Fig. 12 shows the measured total error losses and the calculated iron loss. The maximum error was 15(W) between measured total error losses and the calculated iron loss. However it has almost no effect on torque like as torque experimental result.
Most importantly, the maximum and minimum values of the calculated iron loss were reversed at specific current phase angle. Also, the measured total error losses were showed the same pattern. So, measured total error losses include the iron loss.
So, in this paper, the aspect of iron loss variation according to current phase angle was measured by the total error losses.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Measured total error losses and calculated iron loss
5. Conclusion
Generally, an iron loss is usually better known as the noload loss in electrical machine. But an iron loss was changed by current phase angle variation, because a linkage flux was changed by magnetic flux density of iron core.
In iron loss calculation, the iron loss coefficients were calculated by CFM, and magnetic flux density of iron core was calculated by FEM. The iron loss was stepwise decreased according to a rise of d-axis current.
In this paper, the torque including the iron loss was calculated and experimented. So, the torque does not have error nearly. And, the direct measurement of iron loss was very difficult. Therefore, the total error was measured for estimation of the iron loss. As a result, the maximum error was 15(W) between measured total error losses and the calculated iron loss. However it has almost no effect on torque like as torque experimental result.
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by the MEST and NRF through the Human Resource Training Project for Regional Innovation and the Second Stage of Brain Korea21 Projects.
BIO
Gyu-Won Cho He received B.S and M.S degree in electrical engineering from Changwon National University, Korea. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D. degree at Changwon National University. His research interests are electrical machine and FEM analysis.
Dong-Yeong Kim He received M.S degree in electrical engineering from Changwon National University, Korea. His research interests are electrical machine and FEM analysis.
Gyu-Tak Kim He received B.S, M.S and Ph.D degree in electrical engineeering from Hanyang University, Korea. He is presently a Professor of Changwon National University. His research interests are electrical machine and FEM analysis.
References
Morimoto S. , Takeda Y. , Hirasa T. 1990 “Current phase Control Methods for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors” IEEE Trans. on Power Electronics 5 (2) 133 - 139    DOI : 10.1109/63.53150
Kang Gyu-Hong , Hong Jung-Pyo , Kim Gyu-Tak , Park Jung-Woo 2000 “Improved Parameter Modeling of Interior Permenent Magnet Synchronous Motor Based on Finite Element Analysis” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics 36 (4) 1867 - 1870    DOI : 10.1109/20.877809
Domeki H. , Ishihara Y. , Kaido C. , Kawase Y. , Kitamura S. , Shimomura T. , Takahashi N. , Yamada T. , Yamazaki K. 2004 “Investigation of benchmark model for estimating iron loss in rotating machine” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics 40 (2) 794 - 797    DOI : 10.1109/TMAG.2004.825442
Chen Y. , Pillay P. 2002 “An Improved formula for lamination core loss calculations in machines operating with high frequency and high flux density excitation” Industry Application conference 2 13 - 18
Yamazaki Katsumi 2003 “Torque and Efficiency Calculation of an Interior Permanent Magnet Motor Considering Harmonic Iron Losses of Both the Stator and Rotor” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics 39 (3) 1460 - 1463    DOI : 10.1109/TMAG.2003.810515
Boglietti. A , CavagniNo. A , Lazzari. M , Pastorelli M. 2003 “Predicting iron losses in soft magnetic materials with arbitrary voltage supply : an engineering approach” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics 39 (2) 981 - 989    DOI : 10.1109/TMAG.2003.808599
Ha Kyung-Ho , Cha Sang-Yoon , Kim Jae-Kwan , Hong Jung-Pyo 2006 “Analysis of magnetic field behavior and iron loss in stator core of permanent magnet type motor” Trans of the KIEE 55 76 - 82
Lee Ping-Kun , Kuo Kai-Chen , Wu Cheng-Ju , Wong Zuo-Tin , Yen Jia-Yush 2011 “Prediction of iron losses using the modified Steinmetz equation under the sinusoidal waveform” Control Conference (ASCC) 579 - 584
Reinert J. , Brockmeyer A. , De Doncker R. W. A. A. 2002 “Calculation of Losses in Ferro- and Ferrimagnetic Materials Based on the Modified Steinmetz Equation,” IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications 37 (4)
Morimoto. S , Takeda. Y , Hirasa. T , Taniguchi. K 1990 “Expansion of Operating Limits for Permanent Magnet Motor by Current Vector Control Considering Inverter Capacity” IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications 26 (5) 866 - 871    DOI : 10.1109/28.60058
Kang B. H , Kim Y. T , Cho G. W , Lee J. G , jang K. B , Kim G. T 2012 “Estimation Iron Loss Coefficients and Iron Loss Calculation of IPMSM According to Core Material” KIEE Trans. on Electrical Engineers 61 (9) 1269 - 1274    DOI : 10.5370/KIEE.2012.61.9.1269
Steven C. P , John L. O 1985 “A study of system losses in a transistorized inverter-induction motor drive system” IEEE trans. on Ind. App. 21 (1) 248 - 258
Eom Jae-Sun , Lee Sang-Joong , Kim Kern-Jong 2001 “A MW-Mvar investment technique focused on system loss minimization” KIEE Trans. on Electrical Engineers 11 (1) 51 - 54