MILGROM’S LAW AND Λ’S SHADOW: HOW MASSIVE GRAVITY CONNECTS GALACTIC AND COSMIC DYNAMICS

Journal of The Korean Astronomical Society.
2015.
Jun,
48(3):
191-194

- Received : March 11, 2015
- Published : June 30, 2015

Download

PDF

e-PUB

PubReader

PPT

Export by style

Share

Article

Metrics

Cited by

TagCloud

Massive gravity provides a natural solution for the dark energy problem of cosmology and is also a candidate for resolving the dark matter problem. I demonstrate that, assuming reasonable scaling relations, massive gravity can provide for Milgrom’s law of gravity (or “modified Newtonian dynamics”) which is known to remove the need for particle dark matter from galactic dynamics. Milgrom’s law comes with a characteristic acceleration, Milgrom’s constant, which is observationally constrained to a
_{0}
≈ 1.1 × 10
^{−10}
ms
^{−2}
. In the derivation presented here, this constant arises naturally from the cosmologically required mass of gravitons like
, with Λ,
H
_{0}
, and Ω
_{Λ}
being the cosmological constant, the Hubble constant, and the third cosmological parameter, respectively. My derivation suggests that massive gravity could be the mechanism behind both, dark matter and dark energy.
dark matter
problem and the
dark energy
problem. Canonical ΛCDM cosmology (e.g.,
Bahcall et al. 1999
) requires about 95% (e.g.,
Ade et al. 2014
) of the mass/energy content of the universe to be provided by exotic dark components for which physical counterparts have not been identified. Dark matter and dark energy are commonly assumed to be unrelated: dark matter is identified with as yet undiscovered new exotic elementary particles, whereas dark energy is linked to a
cosmological constant
, Λ, which is inserted into Einstein’s field equations and which triggers an accelerated expansion of the universe on its largest scales.
ΛCDM cosmology is based on the assumption that gravitation is Einsteinian on all scales. Modified theories of gravity might be able to describe the universe without dark components; this idea has initiated a vast number of works exploring multiple models of gravitation (see
Clifton et al. 2012
for an exhaustive review). A quantum-field theoretical modified theory of gravity, first proposed by
Fierz & Pauli (1939)
, is
massive gravity
in which gravitation is mediated by virtual bosons,
gravitons
, that have a very small (compared to all other elementary particles) non-zero mass. Massive gravitons, being virtual exchange particles, have a limited life time governed by Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation for energy and time. If the mass of the graviton is such that its life time is
, the decay of gravity induces an accelerated expansion of the universe like the one actually observed – thus providing an elegant resolution of the dark energy problem (recently, e.g.,
Cardone et al. 2012
;
Clifton et al. 2012
;
Hinterbichler 2012
;
Volkov 2012
;
Tasinato et al. 2013
;
De Felice et al. 2013
;
de Rham 2014
).
On smaller scales, the dynamics of galaxies is in excellent agreement with a modification of Newtonian dynamics (the
MOND paradigm
) in the limit of small acceleration (or gravitational field strength)
g
, expressed in
Milgrom’s law
(Milgrom 1983a) with
g
_{N}
being the Newtonian field strength,
a
_{0}
denoting
Milgrom’s constant
, and
μ
being a transition function with
μ
= 1 for
g
/a
_{0}
≫ 1 and
μ
=
g
/
a
_{0}
for
g
/
a
_{0}
≪ 1. Such a modification implies that the ratio of dynamical and luminous masses of a stellar system, the
mass discrepancy
M
_{dyn}
/
M
_{0}
, exceeds unity and becomes a function of acceleration (or field strength) when assuming Newton’s law of gravity. In the “deep MOND” limit
g
/a
_{0}
≪ 1, the circular speed
v_{c}
of stars in rotation-supported dynamical systems (especially disk galaxies) is
with
G
being Newton’s constant (Milgrom 1983a,b,c); note that
and
g
_{N}
=
GM
_{0}
/
r
^{2}
for circular orbits with radius
r
. For pressure-supported systems (especially elliptical galaxies and galaxy clusters) with 3D velocity dispersion
σ
, the mass–velocity relation takes the form
(
Milgrom 1984
,
1994
). Equations (1, 2, 3), with a
_{0}
≈ 1.1 × 10
^{−10}
ms
^{−2}
, naturally provide for the fundamental scaling laws of galactic kinematics, specifically the baryonic Tully–Fisher, baryonic Faber–Jackson, mass discrepancy–acceleration (MDA), and surface mass density–acceleration relations, plus the asymptotic flattening of rotation curves and the occurrence of “dark rings” in galaxy clusters (
Sanders 1994
,
2010
;
Rhee 2004a
,
b
;
McGaugh 2004
,
2005a
,
b
;
Milgrom & Sanders 2008
;
McGaugh 2011
;
Gentile et al. 2011
;
Cardone et al. 2011
;
Famaey & McGaugh 2012
;
Trippe 2014
;
Walker & Loeb 2014
;
Wu & Kroupa 2015
;
Milgrom 2015
;
Chae & Gong 2015
). Milgrom’s law eliminates particle dark matter from galactic dynamics together with its substantial difficulties (cf., e.g.,
Kroupa 2012
,
2015
).
As pointed out by Trippe (
2013a
,
b
,
c
,
2015
), massive gravity can, at least in principle, provide Milgrom’s law together with an expression for the function
μ
in agreement with observations. Following up on this ansatz, I investigate the link of galactic dynamics to the cosmic expansion history. A physical connection is established by the graviton mass
. Milgrom’s constant is given by
, with
c
, Λ,
H
_{0}
, and Ω
_{Λ}
being the speed of light, the cosmological constant, the (present-day) Hubble constant, and the (present-day) third cosmological parameter, respectively. Accordingly, massive gravity might offer a natural alternative explanation for the phenomena conventionally associated with dark matter and dark energy.
M
_{0}
is the source of a spherical graviton halo with mass density
where
m_{g}
is the graviton mass,
n_{g}
is the graviton particle density,
R
is the radial coordinate, and
η
is a scaling factor. The proportionality
ρ
_{g}
∝
M
_{0}
R
^{−2}
follows from (i) consistency with the classical force law in the Newtonian limit, and (ii) the inverse-square-of-distance law of flux conservation (but see also the discussion in Section 3). For a circular orbit of radius
r
around
M
_{0}
, the total, dynamical mass experienced by a test particle follows from integrating
ρ
_{g}
(
R
) from 0 to
r
,
with
M
_{g}
being the mass contributed by the graviton halo. One can bring this expression into the more intuitive form
where
f
is a dimensionless number,
x
is a mass scale, and
y
is a length scale (with
η
≡
f
/(
xy
)).
With gravitons being virtual exchange particles, their effective mass can be estimated from (cf., e.g.,
Griffiths 2008
) Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation for energy and time,
with
T
_{g}
being the life time of gravitons and
ħ
being the reduced form of Planck’s constant. Consistency with the cosmic expansion history requires
resulting in
According to the standard “cosmic triangle” formalism (e.g.,
Bahcall et al. 1999
),
resulting in
for
H
_{0}
≈ 70 kms
^{−1}
Mpc
^{−1}
and Ω
_{Λ}
≈ 0.7 (e.g.,
Ade et al. 2014
), Λ ≈ 1.1 × 10
^{−35}
s
^{−2}
and thus
m
_{g}
≈ 4 × 10
^{−69}
kg ≈ 2 × 10
^{−33}
eV
c
^{−2}
.
A natural choice for a quantum-physical mass scale,
x
in our case, is the
Planck mass
with
G
being Newton’s constant; combination of Equations (9) and (10) leads to
m
_{g}
/
m
_{P}
≈ 2 × 10
^{−61}
. The choice for the scale
y
is less obvious; for our purpose, we require a scale characteristic for gravitationally bound dynamical systems. A good choice (to be discussed in Section 3) is the magnitude of the gravitational potential,
(cf., also
Baker et al. 2015
). As
є
is dimensionless, we can supply
y
with the unit of a length by multiplying
є
and the
Planck length
so that
y
≡
є
l
_{P}
.
Inserting Equations (8, 10, 11, 12) into Equation (6) leads to
Using the classical expression for gravitational field strength,
g
=
GM
_{dyn}
/
r
^{2}
, one finds
or, using the expression given by Equation (9),
Comparison of Equations (14, 15) to the expression following from the “simple
μ
function” (e.g.,
Famaey & McGaugh 2012
) of MOND,
shows that the expressions are equivalent, with Milgrom’s constant being given by
Matching this expression with the empirical value a
_{0}
≈ 1.1 × 10
^{−10}
ms
^{−2}
requires a (universal) value of
f
≈ 0.0088 (or 4π
f
≈ 1/9). It is straightforward to see that in the limit
g
≪
a
_{0}
, Equation (16) leads to Equation (2).
μ
function”. The transition function given by Equation (16), with
a
_{0}
= (1.06 ± 0.05) × 10
^{−10}
ms
^{−2}
, is in excellent agreement with the observed mass discrepancy–acceleration relation of disk galaxies (
Trippe 2013c
). I thus present a physical mechanism that provides astrophysically meaningful expressions for both
μ
and Milgrom’s constant. My derivation implies that dark matter and dark energy could be understood as phenomena arising from the same effect – the non-zero mass and thus finite life time of gravitons. This mechanism also explains why
a
_{0}
∼
cH
_{0}
as already noted by Milgrom (1983a). I also note that a similar approach has been discussed by
van Putten (2014)
in the specific context of de-Sitter space (but see also
van Putten 2015
).
The result expressed in Equation (14) critically depends on the choice of the scales
x
and
y
. Identifying
x
with the Planck mass is a natural choice. Identification of
y
with the magnitude of the gravitational potential,
є
, (multiplied with the Planck length) is suggested by the properties of gravity on astronomical scales. As pointed out recently by
Baker et al. (2015)
, astrophysical gravitating systems are characterized completely by their location in a two-dimensional plane spanned by (i) the parameter
є
and (ii) the
Kretschmann scalar
which corresponds to the magnitude of the Riemann curvature tensor (thus quantifying the local strength of spacetime curvature in the frame of general relativity) and which takes the form
for spherical systems. However, ξ can be expressed in units of the cosmic curvature, Λ/
c
^{2}
; thus the curvature (or at least a specific value thereof) already appears in Equation (8), which suggests the introduction of
є
(multiplied with the Planck length for dimensional reasons) as a new scaling parameter. Conveniently, my choice of
x
and
y
cancels out the constant
ħ
coming with the graviton mass (Equation 8) because
m
_{P}
l
_{P}
=
ħ
/
c
. The dimensionless factor
f
arises from the need to provide a normalization factor for the graviton halo density in Equation (4) of the form
η
≡
f
/(
xy
); I emphasize that
f
is the only free parameter left in the derivation because neither
m
_{P}
nor
l
_{P}
nor
є
are tunable. For mass density distributions, scaling factors 0 <
f
≤ 1 – in our case,
f
≈ 0.9% – can be interpreted generically as filling or efficiency factors (in the absence of further information, as is the case here). I also note that Equation (4) follows explicitly from the limiting case of Newtonian gravity. Obviously, the inverse-square-of-distance law of gravity does not hold globally in massive gravity but only in the limit
g
≫ a
_{0}
. The choice of Equation (4) is motivated by the need to connect Newtonian and modified Newtonian gravity in the strong field limit.
Even though they are quite intuitive already, the relations presented in Section 2 should eventually follow from, or be included in, a complete theory of massive gravity – which has not been found yet. Especially, it will be necessary to connect the classical derivation of Equation (16) with general relativity and the resulting deviations from Newtonian gravity in the strong-field limit (
g
≫
a
_{0}
). A complete theory should also provide for the basic properties of gravitons, especially the absence of graviton–graviton interactions which is required for the validity of the classical force law (as used in Equation (4); cf.,
Trippe 2013a
– but see also
Vainshtein 1972
;
Babichev & Deffayet 2013
;
Avilez-Lopez et al. 2015
). Last but not least, a complete theory of massive gravity should also comprise non-dynamical effects that are currently unexplained in the frame of general relativity; possible candidates are the “radio flux ratio anomaly” affecting the images of multiply gravitationally lensed quasars (e.g.,
Xu et al. 2015
, and references therein) and the discrepancy between mass estimates based on galactic dynamics and those based on gravitational lensing found recently for filaments of the Virgo cluster of galaxies (
Lee et al. 2015
).
via Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation. Massive gravity also implies that any luminous (“baryonic”) mass is surrounded by a (electromagnetically invisible) halo of gravitons that contributes additional mass (“dark matter”). Assuming reasonable scaling relations for such graviton halos, one recovers Milgrom’s law of gravity and finds that Milgrom’s constant is
with
f
≈ 0.9% (or 4π
f
≈ 1/9).
My derivation suggests that dark matter and dark energy could be interpreted as two effects arising from the same physical mechanism: massive gravity. This would imply a natural connection between the dynamics of galaxies and the dynamics of the universe.

1. INTRODUCTION

Modern standard cosmology suffers from two critical issues: the
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

2. CALCULATIONS

Massive gravity implies (
Trippe 2013a
,
b
,
c
,
2015
) that any luminous (“baryonic”) mass
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

3. DISCUSSION

As demonstrated in Section 2, massive gravity can be used to link the cosmological constant to a specific version of Milgrom’s law, namely the one comprising the “simple
PPT Slide

Lager Image

4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

I explore a possible physical connection between dark matter and dark energy. Assuming that gravitation is mediated by virtual gravitons with non-zero mass (massive gravity), the resulting limited life time of gravitons provides for a decay of gravity on cosmological scales and thus an accelerated expansion of the universe (“dark energy”); the graviton mass follows from the cosmological constant like
PPT Slide

Lager Image

PPT Slide

Lager Image

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Benoit Famaey and Christian Boily (both: Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg) for inspiring discussion, and to an anonymous referee for valuable comments. I acknowledge financial support from the Korean National Research Foundation (NRF) via Basic Research Grant 2012-R1A1A-2041387.

Ade P. A. R.
2014
Results. XVI. Cosmological Parameters
A&A
571
A16 -

Avilez-Lopez A.
,
Padilla A.
,
Saffin P. M.
,
Skordis C.
2015
The Parameterized Post-Newtonian-Vainshteinian Formalism
arXiv:1501.01985

Bahcall N. A.
,
Ostriker J. P.
,
Perlmutter S.
,
Steinhardt P. J.
1999
The Cosmic Triangle: Revealing the State of the Universe
Science
284
1481 -
** DOI : 10.1126/science.284.5419.1481**

Babichev E.
,
Deffay C.
2013
An Introduction to the Vainshtein Mechanism
Class. Quantum Grav.
30
184001 -
** DOI : 10.1088/0264-9381/30/18/184001**

Baker T.
,
Psaltis D.
,
Skordis C.
2015
Linking Tests of Gravity on All Scales: From the Strong-Field Regime to Cosmology
ApJ
802
63 -
** DOI : 10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/63**

Cardone V. F.
,
Angus G.
,
Diaferio A.
2011
The Modified Newtonian Dynamics Fundamental Plane
MNRAS
412
2617 -
** DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18081.x**

Cardone V. F.
,
Radicella N.
,
Parisi L.
2012
Constraining Massive Gravity with Recent Cosmological Data
Phys. Rev. D
85
124005 -
** DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.124005**

Chae K.-H.
,
Gong I.-T.
2015
Testing Modified Newtonian Dynamics through Statistics of Velocity Dispersion Profiles in the Inner Regions of Elliptical Galaxies
arXiv:1505.02936

Clifton T.
,
Ferreira P. G.
,
Padilla A.
,
Skordis C.
2012
Modified Gravity and Cosmology
Phys. Rep.
513
1 -
** DOI : 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001**

De Felice A.
,
G¨umr¨ukc¨uoglu A. E.
,
Lin C.
,
Mukohyama S.
2013
On the Cosmology of Massive Gravity
Class. Quantum Grav.
30
184004 -
** DOI : 10.1088/0264-9381/30/18/184004**

de Rham C.
2014
Massive Gravity
Living Rev. Relativ.
17
7 -

Famaey B.
,
McGaugh S. S.
2012
Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions
Living Rev. Relativ.
15
10 -

Fierz M.
,
Pauli W.
1939
On Relativistic Wave Equations for Arbitrary Spin in an Electromagnetic Field
Proc. R. Soc. London A
173
211 -
** DOI : 10.1098/rspa.1939.0140**

Gentile G.
,
Famaey B.
,
de Blok W. J. G.
2011
THINGS about MOND
A&A
527
A76 -

Griffiths D.
2008
Introduction to Elementary Particles
2nd edn
Wiley-VCH
Weinheim

Hinterbichler K.
2012
Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity
Rev. Mod. Phys.
84
671 -
** DOI : 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.671**

Kroupa P.
2012
The Dark Matter Crisis: Falsification of the Current Standard Model of Cosmology
PASA
29
395 -
** DOI : 10.1071/AS12005**

Kroupa P.
2015
Galaxies as Simple Dynamical Systems: Observational Data Disfavor Dark Matter and Stochastic Star Formation
Can. J. Phys.
93
169 -
** DOI : 10.1139/cjp-2014-0179**

Lee J.
,
Kim S.
,
Rey S.-C.
2015
A New Dynamical Mass Estimate for the Virgo Cluster Using the Radial Velocity Profile of the Filament Galaxies
arXiv:1501.07064

McGaugh S. S.
2004
The Mass Discrepancy–Acceleration Relation: Disk Mass and the Dark Matter Distribution
ApJ
609
652 -
** DOI : 10.1086/421338**

McGaugh S. S.
2005
The Baryonic Tully–Fisher Relation of Galaxies with Extended Rotation Curves and the Stellar Mass of Rotating Galaxies
ApJ
632
859 -
** DOI : 10.1086/432968**

McGaugh S. S.
2005
Balance of Dark and Luminous Mass in Rotating Galaxies
Phys. Rev. Lett.
95
171302 -
** DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.171302**

McGaugh S. S.
2011
Novel Test of Modified Newtonian Dynamics with Gas Rich Galaxies
Phys. Rev. Lett.
106
121303 -
** DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.121303**

Milgrom M.
1983
A Modification of the Newtonian Dynamics as a Possible Alternative to the Hidden Mass Hypothesis
ApJ
270
365 -
** DOI : 10.1086/161130**

Milgrom M.
1983
A Modification of the Newtonian Dynamics: Implications for Galaxies
ApJ
270
371 -
** DOI : 10.1086/161131**

Milgrom M.
1983
A Modification of the Newtonian Dynamics: Implications for Galaxy Systems
ApJ
270
384 -
** DOI : 10.1086/161132**

Milgrom M.
1984
Isothermal Spheres in the Modified Dynamics
ApJ
287
571 -
** DOI : 10.1086/162716**

Milgrom M.
1994
Modified Dynamics Predictions Agree with Observations of the HI Kinematics in Faint Dwarf Galaxies Contrary to the Conclusions of Lo, Sargent, and Young
ApJ
429
540 -
** DOI : 10.1086/174341**

Milgrom M.
2015
MOND Theory
Can. J. Phys.
93
107 -
** DOI : 10.1139/cjp-2014-0211**

Milgrom M.
,
Sanders R. H.
2008
Rings and Shells of “Dark Matter” as MOND Artifacts
ApJ
678
131 -
** DOI : 10.1086/529119**

Rhee M.-H.
2004
On the Physical Basis of the Tully–Fisher Relation
JKAS
37
15 -

Rhee M.-H.
2004
Mass-to-Light Ratio and the Tully– Fisher Relation
JKAS
37
91 -

Sanders R. H.
1994
A Faber–Jackson Relation for Clusters of Galaxies: Implications for Modified Dynamics
A&A
284
L31 -

Sanders R. H.
2010
The Universal Faber–Jackson Relation
MNRAS
407
1128 -
** DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16957.x**

Tasinato G.
,
Koyama K.
,
Niz G.
2013
Exact Solutions in Massive Gravity
Class. Quantum Grav.
30
184002 -
** DOI : 10.1088/0264-9381/30/18/184002**

Trippe S.
2013
A Simplified Treatment of Gravitational Interaction on Galactic Scales
JKAS
46
41 -

Trippe S.
2013
A Derivation of Modified Newtonian Dynamics
JKAS
46
93 -

Trippe S.
2013
Can Massive Gravity Explain the Mass Discrepancy–Acceleration Relation of Disk Galaxies?
JKAS
46
133 -

Trippe S.
2014
The ‘Missing Mass Problem’ in Astronomy and the Need for a Modified Law of Gravity
Z. Naturforsch. A
69
173 -

Trippe S.
2015
The “Graviton Picture”: a Bohr Model for Gravitation on Galactic Scales?
Can. J. Phys.
93
213 -
** DOI : 10.1139/cjp-2014-0158**

Vainshtein A. I.
1972
To the Problem of Non-Vanishing Gravitation Mass
Phys. Lett. B
39
393 -

van Putten M. H. P. M.
2014
Galaxy Rotation Curves in de Sitter Space
arXiv:1411.2665

van Putten M. H. P. M.
2015
Accelerated Expansion from Cosmological Holography
MNRAS
450
L48 -
** DOI : 10.1093/mnrasl/slv038**

Volkov M. S.
2012
Cosmological Solutions with Massive Gravitons in the Bigravity Theory
J. High Energy Phys.
2012
35 -

Walker M. G.
,
Loeb A.
2014
Is the Universe Simpler than ΛCDM?
Contemp. Phys.
55
198 -
** DOI : 10.1080/00107514.2014.919741**

Wu X.
,
Kroupa P.
2015
Galactic Rotation Curves, the Baryon-to-Dark-Halo-Mass Relation and Space-Time Scale Invariance
MNRAS
446
330 -

Xu D.
,
Sluse D.
,
Gao L.
2015
How Well Can Dark-Matter Substructures Account for the Observed Radio Flux-Ratio Anomalies?
MNRAS
447
3189 -
** DOI : 10.1093/mnras/stu2673**

Citing 'MILGROM’S LAW AND Λ’S SHADOW: HOW MASSIVE GRAVITY CONNECTS GALACTIC AND COSMIC DYNAMICS
'

@article{ CMHHBA_2015_v48n3_191}
,title={MILGROM’S LAW AND Λ’S SHADOW: HOW MASSIVE GRAVITY CONNECTS GALACTIC AND COSMIC DYNAMICS}
,volume={3}
, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.5303/JKAS.2015.48.3.191}, DOI={10.5303/JKAS.2015.48.3.191}
, number= {3}
, journal={Journal of The Korean Astronomical Society}
, publisher={The Korean Astronomical Society}
, author={Trippe, Sascha}
, year={2015}
, month={Jun}